User talk:Majash2020

Da best director has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appétit!†

Thanks for the welcome chart! You will always be my sweet nectrine pie. Spread WikiLove (and mine too).

Adam Lowe

Hi, you rejected this (Draft:Adam Lowe) for inline citations issues. I think I've fixed these. Can you take a look? MHdabbler (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Ranjani Ramachandran

Hi. You rejected Draft:Ranjani Ramachandran saying "Inline citations need to be fixed". The page has plenty of inline citations, and I don't understand what's wrong with them. I've checked the minimum standards page and believe the citations exceed the specs there. The citations are appropriately footnoted and all the links in the footnotes work. Can you elaborate? Without details, your comment is less than helpful. Psurajit (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Majash2020! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Peter Cooper - Concert PianistRozarella (talk) 23:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there,

I submitted the Peter Cooper article on behalf of my father who was a lose friend. He has asked me to send you the following:

There are numerous entries to Peter in Google they should look at. I ought to have mentioned that he is the author of a book entitled 'Style in Piano Playing' (ISBN 0 7145 3512 5) published by John Calder in 1975. That edition was in hardback and is out of print but the paperback is still available I believe. I don't have its ISBN but could get hold of it if Wikipedia insist. I have a few concert programmes and could supply photocopies as I am not keen to let them have originals and also a recording of a 60 minute radio programme on Peter's life and work transmitted by N.Z. Radio several years ago. Incidentally, it includes my dulcet tones!

I hope this helps.

Kind Regards

Ros Coward

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

• 154 Featured Articles
• 53 Featured Lists
• 7 Featured Topics
• 5 Featured Pictures

• 43 A-Class Articles
• 589 Good Articles
• 9 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Feature: "A-class: Is It Worth It?"
• Interview: Teancum

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
638		Beerbongs & Bentleys (talk)	Add sources
42		Hot Shot (Shaggy album) (talk)	Add sources
499		Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (talk)	Add sources
12		Willetton Senior High School (talk)	Add sources
217		Staying at Tamara's (talk)	Add sources
5		Live: Manchester and Dublin (talk)	Add sources
46		Shawn Everett (talk)	Cleanup
50		Pop TV (talk)	Cleanup
494		Youngblood (5 Seconds of Summer album) (talk)	Cleanup
138		Hit n Run Phase One (talk)	Expand
312		Carousell (company) (talk)	Expand
4		Fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator (talk)	Expand
3,009		Tony Robbins (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54		Actuality film (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
175		Looney Tunes Golden Collection (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
435		Cash flow (talk)	Merge
111		Debasree Chaudhuri (talk)	Merge
771		Mandarin orange (talk)	Merge
4		Tribunal (TV series) (talk)	Wikify
13		Practice pad (talk)	Wikify
103		Jagjaguwar (talk)	Wikify
20		Interactions Corporation (talk)	Orphan
22		MarketInvoice (talk)	Orphan
20		CloudBoost (talk)	Orphan
15		Area 52 (album) (talk)	Stub
3		Sam McMaster (talk)	Stub
37		Rodrigo y Gabriela (album) (talk)	Stub
4,357		Western Stars (talk)	Stub
34		Gorilla Manor (talk)	Stub
63		Johny Antony (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing Amir Marashi. E-Stylus (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Mjs1991. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 03:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to New Page Patrol!

Welcome, Mjs1991 to the New Page Patrol team. Congratulations on receiving the New Page Patrol user permission and on becoming a part of the patroller community. Our mission is to accurately, rather than quickly, handle the new articles which are created. As you begin to patrol it's natural to have lots of questions. Feel free to ask on my talk page or ask for thoughts in the New Page Patroller IRC channel #wikimedia-npp connect or on our Discord server (invite link). We also regularly discuss issues and topics surrounding New Page Patrolling at the NPP discussion page and I would invite you to join us there. I hope you find NPP as rewarding as I do and, again, welcome to the community. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Majash2020,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Misformatting references and track listing and inserting multiple irrelevant references...

Why would you do this? Please use {{ping}} if you respond here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@Koavf:, first of all, the references don't belong in the references section, they need to be added as inline citations, hence why the {{reflist}} table so inline citations can be added there rather than having all the references in the section, see WP:INCITE. Secondly, Metacritic score needed to be updated and i added in the ratings table to make it look more appropriate. And the addition of a tracklist looks better too. If this is an issue, please let me know. --Mjs1991 (talk) 22:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

References are to be included at the end, hence {{Use list-defined references}} is one of the first things in the article. Why do you think that doesn't apply to you and your edits? Secondly, I do not believe that {{track listing}} looks better--I think it's much worse. Thank you for updating the Metacritic score. If you want to reinsert {{Album ratings}} but exclude reviews of unrelated albums, that would be a welcome addition as well. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
554		Calexico (band) (talk)	Add sources
43		Noonday Dream (talk)	Add sources
4		Standing in the Line of Fire (talk)	Add sources
118		Warsaw 44 (talk)	Add sources
57		Boris Pahor (talk)	Add sources
11		Emily Nokes (talk)	Add sources
234		History of sound recording (talk)	Cleanup
24		Nzingha Stewart (talk)	Cleanup
422		Lil Bibby (talk)	Cleanup
89		Clap Your Hands Say Yeah (talk)	Expand
25		L7 (band) discography (talk)	Expand
486		Eight-hour day (talk)	Expand
46		Jersey Shore sound (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
628		The Script (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
680		Silvio Dante (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
101		Trump Tower Moscow (talk)	Merge
291		PAX (event) (talk)	Merge
169		Christ's Hospital (talk)	Merge
16		Positive (photography) (talk)	Wikify
11		The Launderettes (talk)	Wikify
83		Grey's Anatomy (soundtrack) (talk)	Wikify
7		Robert E. Michler (talk)	Orphan
2		Edward DeGroff (talk)	Orphan
2		Sotirios Prapas (talk)	Orphan
508		Zuu (talk)	Stub
26		11:11 (Rodrigo y Gabriela album) (talk)	Stub
96		Wildness (album) (talk)	Stub
2,005		Tim (Avicii album) (talk)	Stub
7		Sarah Price (filmmaker) (talk)	Stub
29		Swiss Cheese Union (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Nicolas Chaillan's page

Sir, Thank you for your comments regarding my draft page for Nicolas Chaillan, the Chief Software Officer for the Air Force. I believe I've addressed your concerns. Deleted 404 citations which don't exist anymore. Added new Air Force and DoD citations. Fixed the existing citations... his role as Chief Software Officer for the Air Force should be enough to demonstrate that he is notable. He also founded 12 companies, was Chief Architect at DHS and Lead DevSecOps for all of DoD. I have refs for all of these, all mention him by name. Several dedicated articles on him as well.

There are now a dozen or so articles that talk about him as the Chief Software Officer for the Air Force and the Co-Lead for DevSecOps for the Department of Defense. Same for his role at Qualys as CTO!

Since he is an entrepreneur and for the company's references, it is quite common that articles talk about the company AND him so I'm hoping this is enough... He is always mentioned as a reference to demonstrate his involvement. My goal was to prove he was part of those companies.

Page is here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nicolas_M._Chaillan

Thank you sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanbernard2019 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

‪Anatomy Act of Quebec‬

Apart from improving articles, my page creations were mostly shortcuts or project/template-space pages (apart from many user talk pages when patrolling). This may very well be my first actual article, at least that I remember. Thanks for patrolling new pages, —PaleoNeonate – 11:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @PaleoNeonate:, it was my pleasure. Good luck with your future creations.--Mjs1991 (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Devoe nomination & declination

Hello Mjs1991, I have a quick question for you about this edit that you made to Draft:Paul Devoe nominating it for deletion under CSD criterion WP:G4. What makes you believe that it falls under G4? I am genuinely curious if I missed something. --Regards, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @TheSandDoctor:, unfortunately i misread the G4 criteria, and put it up for deletion based on the fact that it has been up for deletion discussion. I wasn't aware that this article has more content than the previous article as I can't see that previous one.

But shouldn't the article still be up for a deletion, as the individual is only notable for the murders and nothing else, as per WP:BLP1E?--Mjs1991 (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

We all make mistakes . As for WP:BLP1E: you may be correct, but drafts tend to not be reviewed against notability guidelines in the same way that articles are/as strictly (eg "notability" is generally not an accepted sole reason for a draft to be deleted since drafts are intended as a work-in-progress). You are more than welcome to nominate it at MfD, but just be prepared for possible opposition if notability is the sole reason for nomination. What I will have to ask though is that you please either change your decline rationale of the draft from WP:G4 to something relevant or rescind and leave the review open for someone else to take a look at as the decline rationale is currently invalid. If you ever have any questions, do feel free to reach out! --Regards, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for letting me know @TheSandDoctor: --Mjs1991 (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome! Could you please rescind your AfC declination (on the draft) per my request (by removing it)? (Given that you have nominated it for deletion, I do not see the need to re-instate the submission template unless the outcome is "keep".) --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Notability

Please see my note to you at Draft:Jill Fisch. --2604:2000:E010:1100:4D9F:AEE9:85C7:8566 (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
681		4:13 Dream (talk)	Add sources
1,248		Death Grips (talk)	Add sources
16		This Time It's for Real (talk)	Add sources
145		Milosh (talk)	Add sources
56		Pinewood Smile (talk)	Add sources
835		Doin' Time (talk)	Add sources
1,638		Jungle (band) (talk)	Cleanup
303		Modern Baseball (talk)	Cleanup
75		Catholic Church sexual abuse cases in Europe (talk)	Cleanup
5,281		Red Dead Redemption 2 (talk)	Expand
43		Microphone Champion (talk)	Expand
22		Pretty Saro (talk)	Expand
2,869		Rapping (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6,076		Autonomous sensory meridian response (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Douglas Arthur Teed (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
29		Falsity (talk)	Merge
1,334		Big Pun (talk)	Merge
69		St. Teresa's College (talk)	Merge
1,432		Jackson Avery (talk)	Wikify
31		Portuguese language in Goa (talk)	Wikify
7		Curial response to Catholic sexual abuse cases (talk)	Wikify
4		Robert S. Poston (talk)	Orphan
4		Christoph Huber (talk)	Orphan
2		Katie Taft (talk)	Orphan
17		Joe Perry (album) (talk)	Stub
16		I've Got the Rock'n'Rolls Again (talk)	Stub
185		Seven Days Walking (talk)	Stub
83		Springsteen on Broadway (album) (talk)	Stub
1,505		Happiness Begins (talk)	Stub
15		Expo 86 (album) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:23, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Request on 20:00:57, 16 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Emilythornberg

• Emilythornberg (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jordan Reyes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I am having trouble understanding why this page isn't getting approved. I've edited it a few times and put reliable sources where Jordan is mentioned on multiple records and personal albums. Could you please explain more thoroughly why I can't get approval here? Thank you!

Emilythornberg (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Emilythornberg:. the only sources on the page are from AllMusic, there needs to be more secondary sources from news articles, journal, ect. Please read WP:THREE, it might give you an insight on what you need to do. Thanks --Mjs1991 (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your changes to chart peaks

What is with this edit and the one before it? You didn't "update" the Australian and UK peaks, you changed them to an incorrect peak position—the album peaked at number 7 in Australia and number 4 in the UK, not 28 and 11. Please be careful in future. Edit: Oh right, I remember you asking now if we keep the peak or update to the latest chart position... it's always peak positions on discographies and in chart tables on articles. A lower/more current position has never been significant. Ss112 08:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry @Ss112:, I had done those edits a bit before messaging you for your help, when I started to realise I may have been wrong. I probably should have gone back and fixed up those edits.--Mjs1991 (talk) 09:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Mary Smith

Hello! My draft was rejected for lack of reliable sources and for using its own site as a source. Please look at [page], which has fewer sources and includes two sources linked to its page, yet is approved. I would really appreciate some feedback/guidance on this. Thank you! MarySmith1099 (talk) 13:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Disregard - I just saw some additional editor comments and made some additional changes. Thanks!MarySmith1099 (talk) 13:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

... for creating album articles that are well written and properly sourced with reviews and chart placings... I'm sure you're well aware that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of album stub articles on Wikipedia that are poorly-written garbage that need time and effort to be worked on, and it's such a relief to come across one of your articles and know even before looking at it that it won't need anything more than perhaps a WikiProject tag added on the talk page. Thank you for the great work. Richard3120 (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @Richard3120: for the acknowledgement. Which article was it that you came across?--Mjs1991 (talk) 00:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

All of them! I regularly go through the list of new articles created at User:AlexNewArtBot/AlbumSearchResult to see if they need work, redirecting, etc. and your articles crop up there all the time. Richard3120 (talk) 00:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Stewart Vaughan - speedy delete

I am astonished to see this notice.

I did an online course in 2017 with wikiMOOC, so I have not approached this as a novice.

I discovered that the French wikipedia page about the Théâtre de la Michodière, (about which, living in Paris, I know a lot,) had been translated into English. Indeed, following this, I made some clarifying contributions. Stewart Vaughan's name appears many times on this page, as the coadapter of major works by major UK authors such as Ray Cooney. He is a member of the French SACD (Society des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques)with the highest of the three statuses (Adhérent, Sociétaire adjoint, Sociétaire).

As further French personalities appear on English wikipedia, where relevant I have provided a link to Stewart Vaughan For example, see the page for Delphine Depardieu. Referring again to this page, you will see a link to Jacques Decombe. His page on English wikipedia is practically empty but I see no call for deletion.

I have provided references to web sites and publications which provided authentifying proof. I have not clicked on the "contest this speedy deletion" until I have a response from you.

You state "the article... does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant" I would argue: The proportion of SACD "adhérents" who reach the status of "Sociétaire" is fairly limited. Someone who has adapted major British playwrights and seen their work performed in major Parisian commercial theatres, as well as Brussels major commercial theatre is not insignificant. Someone whose work as an adaptor has been published by France's major theatrical publishing house is not insignificant. Someone whose work has been performed by stars such as Gerard Jugnot, Francis Perrin, Roland Giraud, Alexandre Brasseur, Stéphane de Groodt, is not insignificant.

I look forward to hearing from you. Fuhndhu (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2019 (UTC)