Jump to content

User talk:Aoi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 935376630 by 2600:387:B:982:0:0:0:1 (talk)
(edit summary removed)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
== Banned indefinitely. ==

You have been [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]] indefinitely per community consensus for [[WP:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]. <!-- Template:banned-indef -->

__NOEDITSECTION__

<!--{{wikibreak|back=on or around December 3, 2019.}}-->
<!--{{wikibreak|back=on or around December 3, 2019.}}-->
<!--{{busy|reason=work deadlines and other obligations}}-->
<!--{{busy|reason=work deadlines and other obligations}}-->

Revision as of 05:24, 12 January 2020

Banned indefinitely.

You have been banned indefinitely per community consensus for abuse of editing privileges.



21st Century Fox & Fox (company) pages

Aoi, visit my talk page section of the same name to express your opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.165.180.110 (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@24.165.180.110: Hi, I'm not sure exactly what subject in relation to these articles you wanted to discuss. In any case, if the discussion deals with these two articles, it might be better to open a discussion on the article's talk page so others following the article may participate. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Closures

Thanks. I don't do that very often. Deb (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added EnterpriseyJJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

Attacking you because I stated the obvious truth? Reviewing the history page of that Dexter article, you claimed my edits didn't make sense and you was completely vague (in other words, subtle) about it. Explain why and then maybe I'll understand and stop. Simple. Why is that sooooo hard for you registered users? 68.197.237.168 (talk) 02:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP, calling another editor an idiot in an edit summary is a personal attack. If you genuinely don't understand that, perhaps we should just go ahead and block you now. General Ization Talk 02:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And no, as Aoi advised you the phrase "with drastic changes to the art and background style instead of neither the previous seasons' cel animation nor original art and background style" does not make sense. "instead of neither ... nor..." is not a construction you will find in any book on English grammar, any more than you will find "you was completely vague" (also grammatically incorrect). Familiarity with correct English grammar is actually a requirement to edit articles here. General Ization Talk 02:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do not mimic me by quoting something I stated. And then you had the nerve to talk about me personally attacking people. Oh please. 68.197.237.168 (talk) 02:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:BATTLEGROUND. Unless you start editing collaboratively and treating other editors civilly, we can arrange for some time off for you. This time, it will be longer than a month. General Ization Talk 02:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you do that, then I'll simply change IPs or create a registered account and hide under it. Simple. Makes no difference to me, son. 68.197.237.168 (talk) 02:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it will be easy to recognize you if you return. In the mean time, thank you for self-reverting. Now why don't we all go do something more productive? General Ization Talk 02:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever my guy. Sheesh. >:-( 68.197.237.168 (talk) 02:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you revert my edits to that article without explanation? How dare you?!?! 68.197.237.168 (talk) 02:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading AIV report

Refrain from making misleading AIV reports such as this. Sure I made an edit in error but not repeatedly and never had a warning contrary to the report you filed. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you blanked the majority of a high visibility page on my watchlist, and seeing as your talk page included a number of warnings, including a final warning about removing or blanking page content on January 5, 2019, I would not call the AIV report misleading. In any case, I am glad to see you have been unblocked. Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RFC Request

Dear Fellow Wikipedian


I would like to invite you to my RFC request on  the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.


Kind Regards

Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous


About Warner Bros. Family Entertainment

Hey Aoi. Can I ask you something?

So, About Warner Bros. Family Entertainment.

Can you tell me what are your favorite shows, movies, specials and companies related to and distributed by Warner Bros. Family Entertainment, PLEASE? Thank you. JordanBatista (talk) 16:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JordanBatista: Sorry, I actually don't really have any favorites. Thank you for asking though. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accusation of sockpuppetry

Hey Aoi, I want to ask you why did you undone my edit on Sweetener (album) page and why are you accusing me of sockpuppetry. SUPERSNAKE66 11 March 2019

@SUPERSNAKE66: I believe the fact that you were just blocked as a sockpuppet should speak for itself. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 21CF

For all intents and purposes, it is effectively defunct today, as Fox Corporation has begun trading.

Do we really have to wait for the clock to strike 12 and the ball to drop before we change "is" to "was"? Many of the statements now allude to properties that, as of today, are no longer part of 21CF. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ViperSnake151: On the same token, does it really hurt to wait just another five hours and fifty minutes when the transaction becomes finalized? To say that 21st Century Fox no longer exists as a corporate entity at this particular moment is simply not true. However, I don't have extremely strong feelings about this so if you want to change the statements from present tense to past tense, I will not revert you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I do greatly appreciate you bringing this to my talk page instead of reverting, like many of the editors that are rather blindly editing with Fox/Disney-related articles. Much thanks. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skai

Hey aoi i'm sakhe123 i don't think i made a mistake with editing skai jackson's page Sakhe123 (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakhe123: hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I don't think you necessarily made any mistakes when editing Skai Jackson's page. However, when you make edits to articles about living people, Wikipedia requires the edits to be backed up with reliable sources. In this case, you made claims about Jackson's height, residence, mother's name, and other details, but you didn't back any of them up with reliable sources. For biographies of living people, these types of details must be backed up with reliable sources. If you need help citing sources, please see Wikipedia:Citing sources, or you can ask me or another editor. Please feel free to insert the information back in the article as long as you cite a reliable source when doing so. Much thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skai

@Aoi may i ask how do i back up my editsSakhe123 (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakhe123: just gotta follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Citing sources. In short, probably the easiest way to cite something if you're not using the Visual Editor is to use the the Ref Toolbar. When you're editing a page, right above the edit area is a small menu that looks like this:
You see on the top of the box there's the word "cite"? Just click on that, then click on "Templates" and select the template for the source you're using. If you're using a website, for example, just hit "Templates" and then click "cite web".
A new dialog will pop up that looks similar to the one above. Just fill in the web address for the source you are citing (and other relevant information like the website title, etc.), and hit "insert" and the tool will do the rest for you.
Just remember that you should use reliable sources -- so nothing self-published (no blogs, no Wikia, etc.), and it should preferably be an independent secondary source (for example, a news article from a reputable news source). Hope that helps! Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

This can NOT be happening

This isn't fair. I am good editor to Wikipedia. I put stuff on articles that are true and remove vandalism[1] (not the only page see contribs). Like seriously, Last warning? Come on! I am against this. You can't do this to me. Thanks, HappyINC at 3 April 2019, at 10:48.

References

  1. ^ "Changes - Wikipedia". en.m.wikipedia.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Aoi,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous


St. Louis Blues

You have made the page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis_Blues factually incorrect by undoing the edits of 206.75.145.84 on 13-June-2019. The longest playoff streak in North American Professional sports history is the 34 year 1972-2005 streak of the Edmonton Eskimos of the CFL You can verify this for yourself, and should probably link to it. If you wanted to edit this to be the longest streak among the NFL, MLB, NBA, and NHL teams, that would be factual, but what you have reverted to is not.

You have also undone the edit regarding the scandal of the 1998 Stanley Cup final. The goal was not controversial -- it was not a goal. Replay clearly showed that. You could create a link to these facts. Instead you have chosen to bury the facts. Sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.75.145.84 (talk) 00:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your talk. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:05, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your response, but you have not acknowledged your factual errors and have made the entry incorrect by your edits, and made it conflict with the following page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton_Eskimos Please undo your reversion I have seen your comment that my expansion of 'controversial' is not neutral. It should not BE neutral. What happened was a verifiable scandal and should be noted with disgust. This page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_NFC_Championship_Game is also unacceptable sanitization of factual events, but at least there is more detail given about the egregious error made there--and it was an error. Bettman's actions in awarding Dallas a Stanley Cup were not an error, but purposeful and excreable. 206.75.145.84 (talk) 23:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas & Friends

Thank you for fixing the episode list. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 (talk) 13:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @69.112.141.200: thank you for the note! Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waikiki Trolley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diamond Head, Punchbowl and Sandy Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My kids love it, though they agreed that the Camel episode suffered from cultural appropriation. Drmies (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: The show looks very cute, though I have never actually seen the show myself. (I gotta find out what kinds of things my godchildren are watching.) Your kids sound very smart! Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Curious as to why this gets flagged but a Reference in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pele%27s_hair citation #6 does not get flagged for similar tags, additions of links?? Brian.balderrama (talk)

I flagged your edits because the edits consisted solely of the addition of links that went against policy. If you didn't know that was against policy, that's fine, just please refrain from doing it in the future and you'll be fine. I removed the other link you referenced. Best regards, Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Changes

Aoi, why are you changing things that after I fixed them that we wanted them to be real? (talk) 6:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

a comment

"Join the love cabal" don't need to "join" any clique!

"Spread the wikilove" don't have to "spread"!

that's not "love" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8476:7E00:5CEA:2370:6D89:E148 (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 30 September 2019

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.

Things That I Want To Exist For Real

Here are some things that I want to exist for real:

Bob the Builder: Season 22 (2020)

Bob the Builder Returning To Nick Jr For A 22nd Season

Nature Cat On TVOKids (Even Though I Hate Nature Cat)

Nature Cat On Knowledge: Kids (Even Though I Hate Nature Cat)

Nature Cat On CBBC (Even Though I Hate Nature Cat)

Nature Cat On ABC ME (Even Though I Hate Nature Cat)

Sadie's Big World (Real TV Show)

Let's Go Luna! On ABC Kids

Let's Go Luna! On Milkshake! On Channel 5

Let's Go Luna! On Cartoonito (UK & Ireland)

Esme & Roy On ABC Kids

Esme & Roy On Cartoonito (UK & Ireland)

Here are the links to Bob the Builder: Season 22 (2020), Sadie's Big World, and List of programs broadcast by ABC Kids (Australia):

https://ideas.fandom.com/wiki/Bob_the_Builder%3A_Season_22_(2020)

https://ideas.fandom.com/wiki/Sadie's_Big_World

https://ideas.fandom.com/wiki/List_Of_Programs_Broadcast_By_Nick_Jr.

https://abc-kids-australia.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ABC_Kids_(Australia)

I hope you will listen to me. 2601:C2:46E0:E985:95B1:E657:F8CB (talk) 04:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C2:4100:46E0:C022:D6B9:A227:C9D5 (talk) [reply]

The Bob The Builder Franchise Is Still In Production

The Bob the Builder franchise is still in production. Go to the WildBrain website and go to studios. It is still in production. It will renew for a 22nd season. 2601:C2:46E0:E985:95B1:E657:F8CB (talk) 06:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C2:4100:46E0:C022:D6B9:A227:C9D5 (talk) [reply]

Reasons Why Bob the Builder (2015 TV series) Is Still Currently In Production

Here are the reasons why Bob the Builder (2015 TV series) is still currently in production.

1. The WildBrain website says that Bob the Builder is on the in production on studios.

2. It was going to renew for a 4th season of the reboot series.

3. It is still making more new episodes and specials.

4. It was supposed to air on Nick Jr. in the US soon with the reboot series.

5. The 2015 reboot of Bob the Builder is still currently in production.

I wanted to tell you all of this. Spencer M. Collins (talk) 17:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spencer M. Collins: Aside from the fact that you are evading a block, please note that items posted on Wikipedia must be verifiable. From the relevant policy, that basically means that "[R]eaders must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations." You need to provide a source that shows that the show has been renewed for a fourth season, or that Nick Jr. was going to air the series. The link showing that Bob the Builder is listed as "in production" on the website might work, but speculating that this means that there is a fourth season or that there are new episodes and specials or that Nick Jr. will air these shows is not verifiable using that source. But in either case, you're currently evading a block and shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. You need to log into your original account and request to be unblocked there. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration


New WW1 montage

Hi, can I get your opinion on the new montage proposal on the WW1 talkpage? Roddy the roadkill (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:United Artists

Any idea who the master is who keeps editing with IPs at Talk:United Artists? I can't find a name in the edit history, though I certainly see the pattern of behaviour. —C.Fred (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: I am very confident that this is Nate Speed, given the style of the edit summaries. Aoi (青い) (talk) 16:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Matches the pattern enough for me. I will start blocking IPs on sight and will protect the talk page again if this continues too much longer. —C.Fred (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred: Thank you for your help with this. Hope you have a great Thanksgiving if you celebrate it! Aoi (青い) (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFirToBeFree
removed AkhilleusAthaenaraJohn VandenbergMelchoirMichaelQSchmidtNeilNYoungamerican😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Aoi, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,

★Trekker (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous