User talk:Cinadon36
Completion of the inital Socrates review
I've completed my initial review of Socrates. My assessment was "on hold". Most problems are simply about wording. For my reasoning on each point see the review. If you want sentence by sentence grammatical and Manual of Style suggestions, just notify me. Thank you! Ardenter (talk) 07:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Your GA nomination of Ad hominem
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ad hominem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComplexRational -- ComplexRational (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Albert Camus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Albert Camus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ad hominem
The article Ad hominem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ad hominem for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComplexRational -- ComplexRational (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Albert Camus
The article Albert Camus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Albert Camus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Bravo! czar 02:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Czar, coming from you means a lot. :) Cinadon36 08:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nominations
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Camus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Ad hominem at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info bot, I 'll see what I can do to fix it. Cinadon36 10:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ad hominem
Hello! Your submission of Ad hominem at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks @Alessandro57:, I 'll have a look as soon as I can. Cinadon36 18:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
GA nomination of Anarchism
Hi – the article is has been a good article for 10 years, I'm assuming it was a mistaken nomination and I will delist. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 08:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I see what has happened now from the comments on the talk page, I've responded there, Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input, @Goldsztajn:. Cinadon36 11:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Ad hominem
On 16 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ad hominem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the fallacy of using ad hominem arguments was first discussed by Aristotle in his Sophistical Refutations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ad hominem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ad hominem), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for creating anatomy of the human heart! buidhe 22:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks Buidhe, it 's my fav desert, but I 'll have to run an extra mile to burn the calories! :) Cinadon36 06:57, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
![]() |
Hi I’ve just reviewed Révolte dans les Asturies. Thanks for creating this article, and happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 04:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks Mccapra! I 'll make some yogurt ice cream out of them! Yummi! [1] Cinadon36 07:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Zhu 2015 is missing its full ref. Would you mind adding it? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, will do. Cinadon36 16:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Albert Camus
On 23 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albert Camus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Albert Camus's novel The Plague is based on an epidemic in Oran, Algeria, and examines how a government could turn tyrannical? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Camus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Albert Camus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Million Awards
![]() |
The Three-Quarter Million Award |
For your contributions to bring Albert Camus (estimated annual readership: 880,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Three-Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Half Million Award |
For your contributions to bring Ad hominem (estimated annual readership: 670,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
- Oh! Many thanks Reidgreg. Cinadon36 09:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Instantly restoring cn tagged part
I wonder why you restore this -since 2019- cn tagged part [[2]] without addressing the issue on the cn template. If you can address the issue that's already raised it would be fine but otherwise I'm afraid this part will go per wp:OR.Alexikoua (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for discussing the issue. Maybe Talk page of the article would be a more suitable place to discuss it. Anyway, I will address the issue, but I need some time- a week or so. If I wont, please feek free to remove it. Thanks, Cinadon36 04:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Ad Hominem article
@Cinadon36: Greetings! I saw that you got Ad Hominem to good article standard. I'm sure you're aware that, unfortunately, articles usually lose quality standards because many editors add or remove what they want to articles, especially highly viewed ones. If you could get a quick glance there are edit what should and shouldn't be there that would be great. Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @Wretchskull: for letting me know. I will have a look. Cinadon36 13:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cinadon36: You will probably have to look at it occasionaly because people add things without any consensus, and usually add content that has MOS errors or just poorly sourced (or sourced with unreliable refs). Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- I get your point. Cinadon36 05:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Cinadon36: You will probably have to look at it occasionaly because people add things without any consensus, and usually add content that has MOS errors or just poorly sourced (or sourced with unreliable refs). Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Help pls
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
At Pre-Socratic philosophy#History, I d like to place the wikitable to the right of the text. Cinadon36 13:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Done see Special:Diff/1021576585 - You needed to add floatright on the table class - RichT|C|E-Mail 13:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks @Rich Smith:. :) Cinadon36 13:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pre-Socratic philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melissus.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pre-Socratic philosophy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pre-Socratic philosophy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
André Laks moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, André Laks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 18:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Discospinster:, it seems Andre Laks lacks notability. I created the article since I saw articles about him at french and german wikis, but I am not sure if he is notable enough. Mind, I am not familiar with french or german language. Cinadon36 09:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- References don't have to be in English, you can use Google Translate to see if they are appropriate. ... discospinster talk 13:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: Have a look at those to articles. DE, FR. Refs dont look like article from RS. Cinadon36 17:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The references are to works by him, not about him. That does not in itself show that he is notable. ... discospinster talk 20:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: Have a look at those to articles. DE, FR. Refs dont look like article from RS. Cinadon36 17:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pre-Socratic philosophy
The article Pre-Socratic philosophy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pre-Socratic philosophy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pre-Socratic philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pre-Socratic philosophy
The article Pre-Socratic philosophy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pre-Socratic philosophy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Pre-Socratic philosophy
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pre-Socratic philosophy has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Congratulations on taking it to GA status.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you @Twofingered Typist:, I much appreciate it, your work has been great, as always! :) Cinadon36 04:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-Socratic philosophy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pre-Socratic philosophy
Hello! Your submission of Pre-Socratic philosophy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Nizolan (talk · c.) 20:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Pre-Socratic philosophy
On 12 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pre-Socratic philosophy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that pre-Socratic philosophy included some of the earliest attempts to explain the cosmos as an ordered system without reference to the gods? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-Socratic philosophy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pre-Socratic philosophy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Humanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helvetius.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks bot, will take care. Cinadon36 06:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Socrates you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ardenter -- Ardenter (talk) 07:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)