Click here to start a new discussion Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive title==.
Hey LAX, before Backlash gets reviewed, I suggest you replace all of the 411mania.com references, as it was proven un-reliable, and may come up in the GA review. Good luck with the nomination. Also, you should archive your talk page. lol.-- iMatthewT.C.01:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG, I forgot how to write a PPV. :( Hey, does this ---> "Following the Great American Bash, a rematch between King Booker and Rey Mysterio for the World Heavyweight Championship took place. The match saw King Booker retain, after interference from Chavo Guerrero", make sense? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, because I tried and couldn't get it to work right, though I didn't know what I was doing. It would help because the Templates don't really do anything just sitting around. It would be better if the PPV templates worked with the main one.--WillC01:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SummerSlams
Hey LAX, long time not talk man. I hope you can convert the in-universe style into out-of-universe style of writing for SummerSlam (2007). I would like to do the same with SummerSlam (2003), because I think it is written sort of similarly to SS'07. Hopefully we can get these to FA standards. Another thing that we can add is the reception, so I was thinking doing the reception similar to the reception done in video game articles like it is done here and here, what you think?--SRX22:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now that's what I call "Out-of-universe", I think its also best to explain before the feuds in the lead about the brands, and how they are "brands of wrestling" for WWE to better get an out of universe explanation of what "brands" mean. Also, do you think we should explain that "pinfall" is one of the ways to win?SRX23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about, via pinfall, a victory condition that is met by holding an opponent's shoulders on the wrestling mat for a prescribed period of time. or something like that.SRX00:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That looks great. But where are you going to put it? Also, that should go into the MoS for WP:PW.SRX01:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! Me 2, I can't stop using that. That's gonna come up at FAC, about repetition. The event is especially hard 2.--SRX01:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question for you, I believe I'm suppose to ask a administrator about getting rollback rights if I'm right. If that is true do I qualify for getting them?--WillC03:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I probably have every PPV article and almost everyone of the wrestler articles that are in TNA and WWE in my watchlist so I usually know about almost every bit of vandalism that goes on. I was afraid to ask since the other day I got blocked for moving back an article to its original name without consensus and I thought the block would play a factor it the decision.--WillC05:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually to tell you the truth I was told by a few users that I was right in moving it back. It was me, 1362, and Gavyn Sykes trying to get a guy who kept moving Matt Sydal to his real name without a consensus. I was just helping out them two.--WillC05:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not joking, actually. She was featured on-screen just as much as Long and Coach. All of the three had few lines and really didn't serve any (out-of-kayfabe) purpose besides comedy. I feel that if one isn't notable, the other two aren't either. Just my opinion. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey
Hey, I just got home from my vacation. I don't think I should be a Wikipedian anymore because no-one on Wikipedia likes me. IMatthew, ThinkBlue and everybody else doesnt like me. I'll have a think tonight if I should still be a Wikipedian. One other thing, what have you been up to lately. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:14, 20 July (UTC)
I know you are working on a few articles right now but can you work on an article with me?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:17, 21 July (UTC)
As the title says, something is going on. The rv you did to SummerSlam (2007), the same guy has been used by many IPs to vandalize for the past hour. I believe someone has a product that allows them to change their IP.--WillC02:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I notice you are yet to update your score in the WikiCup. Please update your point totals with the number of FCs, GAs or DYKs you have obtained over the past month, and someone will update your tally at the end of this month. If you do not, only your edit count and unique pages will be considered. Thank you.
Hey, I have a request. During Lockdown's GA Review I have been asked to get someone to copyedit the event section. Would you mind to do that for me?--WillC18:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've tried to copyedit the event for Lockdown as much as I can to a point that I'm not sure what to do. I've read it so many times I can't tell what is good and what is wrong. Hopefully you don't find any problems.--WillC21:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whenever you can get to it, take your time. I'm not in a big rush. IMatthew hasn't given me anymore problems with it lately.--WillC04:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They still find jargon, even though it is explained. They also find the lead to big and should only have the main points of the events and should explain that the event is scripted. Also, there is still grammatical problems like apart--->a part. There are also other problems too, when you want to read it (lol) you should, as it could help SummerSlam 2007.--SRX15:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Sigh. I find this almost impossible, and I am so tired of working on the article by myself, I am so stressed about it.--SRX15:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That was so lame. ;) Do what you gotta do. Question: Are those "quotes" really necessary for the Background? Hey, are you gonna help out with the lead for TT '04? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)02:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I was trying to humor you. ;) I meant no harm. Well, SS'07 has it, but is just that almost every feud in the Bash have the quote. I'm just asking for a second opinion. Well, I was having trouble with writing the aftermath in the lead, since new "feuds" emerged, but I would appreciate it if you can add that little detail in the article. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)02:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On 30 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article No Mercy (2005) , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
I'm close to nominating SS'03 man. Check out the improvements to it. Not all FA reviewers are the same: some are saying it has a chance, others say it will get "shredded."--SRX02:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is a difference between harassing and making the truth known, and the sad truth is that Wikipedia is a pro-American website. I never called you racist, I merely stated that due to the pro-American bias this site tends to show, I do not expect to be successful. Killswitch Engage (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You should make the ratings in number form rather than spell them out, other than that it looks good. You plan on nominating it for GA only right?--SRX18:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, but very wrestling related, lets see if they accept it. Don't feel like doing it but is 200 character or under long?--SRX19:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Armageddon (2003)
On 11 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Armageddon (2003), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
No problem no one else seems to care. And Don't apologize, I'm the one that needs to but we can talk about that in private. <font-family:"Tahoma">ZACH15:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I replied to your last message. <font-family:"Tahoma">ZACH
There are currently 4,675 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 141 unreviewed articles. Out of 186 total nominations, 28 are on hold, 14 are under review, and 3 are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film, and drama (28 articles), Sports and recreation (27 articles), Music (22 articles), Transport (18 articles), and War and military (13 articles).
There are currently 4 articles up for re-review at Good Article Reassessment. Congratulations! There really is no "backlog" here! :-)
GA Sweeps is Recruiting Reviewers
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
GAN Reviewer of the Month
ThinkBlue (talk·contribs) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for July, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. ThinkBlue had a whopping 49 reviews during the month of July! ThinkBlue was also one of our two reviewers of the month from June, and has been editing Wikipedia since December 1, 2006, and is interested in articles dealing with Friends, Will and Grace, CSI:Miami, Monday Night Raw, Coldplay.
Congratulations to Giggy (talk·contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of July include:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
GA Sweeps Process
The GA Sweeps process has recently reached its first year anniversary. If you are unaware of what GA Sweeps is, it is a process put in place to help ensure the integrity of the ever-growing number of GAs, by determining if the articles still meet the GA criteria. Experienced reviewers check each article, improving articles as they review them, and delisting those that no longer meet the criteria. Reviewers work on a specific category of GAs, and there are still many categories that need to be swept. In order to properly keep track of reviews, a set date was used to determine what articles needed to be reviewed (since any future GAs would be passed according to the most recent GA criteria).
The number of GAs that were to be reviewed totals 2,808. Since the beginning of Sweeps, the progress has reviewed 981 by the end of July 2008 (or exempted them). For a table and chart breakdown of the current progress, see here.
With more than twenty editors reviewing the articles, progress is currently a third of the way done. At this rate, it will take another two years to complete the Sweeps, and active involvement is imperative to completing on time. We are always looking for new reviewers, and if you are interested in helping in speeding up the Sweeps process and improving your reviewing skills, please contact OhanaUnited.
Did You Know...
... that the goal of GA Sweeps is to reviewed all articles listed before 26 August2007?
... that the entire category of, "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" has been swept?
... that of all subcategories, "Recordings, compositions and performances" in the Music category has the most articles (240 articles in total)?
User: Kelvinthekiller (Talk | contribs) has broke the 3RR on the WWE Roster page about 15 times I suggest a 24 hour block. What do you think? SteelersFan9420:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to come in, but this user cannot be blocked at this time, as no warning was ever given to him. Give him a warning on his talk page, and if he continues to edit war, then block. -- iMatthewT.C.22:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
..time before I quit again, BC, I dont have any time on the computer since my service is out in my home, god knows when I get it back..P.S. I use the library computer.. RkOrToN22:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I went to the Madison Square Garden RAW House Show on Aug. 24, and John Cena was FINE. He was in a tag team match with Batista, perfectly fine. SomeTimes I hate when WWE has to be such a ***** sometimes (I don't really like Cena, but this is just stupid, they should say he's taking a break or something.) RkOrToN02:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Before nominating it, I strongly suggest opening a peer review for it and look for FA reviewers to comment on it as that is what helped SummerSlam 2003 pass. Just take it as my last advice I give you :)--SRX01:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know. Yeah, its written well. One thing does stand out, "Randy [Randal]", basically the same thing. But, that's just me, probably not that important. I got faith it will be FA. ;) Question: "Canadian Online Explorer" is not suppose to be italicized, right? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)23:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's the only suggestion that I came up with. Yeah, that's what I thought on CANOE not needed to be italicized, the only reason I ask is cause it was mentioned at Bad Blood's GA review and I wanted an opinion on it. After NM, are you gonna work on SummerSlam '07? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)18:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you seem a bit over confident, but alright. Not that I don't have faith in it to pass, but it would have benefited from a good peer review. In that way at the FAC, users will not oppose it due to the way the article is written. Not every FAC reviewer is the same, and not all will give a list of what to work on for their support. But I wish you luck, and if you need help you can always contact me.SRX20:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well Ealdgyth didn't say anything about it. And they notice every ref. So I'm not sure, also because its something minor.--SRX01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey LAX it's me Steelerfan-94, hey is it possible for you to let me get the userboxes of my userpage and for you to let me get my friend list? Thanks. RKO 4 Life (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BFG
Can't the Bound for Glory IV logo be left in the article so that it may be used in a production section to show how TNA hyped the event, or is that also against the rule.--WillC00:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was just wondering because I left it in there so after the event I can use it in a production section. I plan on making BFG IV an FA so I want it to be the best article from the project, that is why I'll be working on it in a sandbox. I feel that logo will help in a production section.--WillC00:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To show how TNA began to hype it. maybe by stating, "The build for Bound for Glory began in earlier July, with TNA announcing that it would take place in Chicago, Illinois. Their first real production of the event came when TNA introduced a new logo for the event. Unlike previous Bound for Glory events, this one was referred to in roman numerals, this was also the first pay-per-view event held by TNA to be referred to in roman numerals. (logo on the side to show the change in events)". Something like that.--WillC01:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:2007SummerSlam.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:2007SummerSlam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know what you're saying regarding the managers and whatnot, but they were indeed there at ringside in the corner of a certain wrestler, and I believe putting in "managed by" avoids any possible confusion to the non-wrestling fan. "Manage" doesn't necessarily imply that the talent are managers; it simply lets the reader know that they served as such, whether it was temporary or not for the given night. "With" could lead to a non-wrestling fan thinking that they were in the match themselves and besides, "managed by" is present within the results table for the FA The Great American Bash (2005), so I see no harm in making it a standard within all PPV articles. Superslammin (talk) 13:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just looked at the edit - I see what you're saying now (didn't know that there was a "manager" page). That aside, I don't see any reason why we couldn't incorporate a sentence regarding Amazon in the reception section. Superslammin (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:No Way Out 2003 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:No Way Out 2003 logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Penubag has been hard at work developing awards for this project. He has completed a very professional looking medal, and is almost done with a trophy that is truly awesome - both of these awards are visually stunning.
I and a few others have been working steadily on the country outlines that will be the focus of the contest - an outline for every country of the world! They're shaping up nicely. So far, 28 of them have been moved to article space - these aren't complete, but they are complete enough to be made available for readers to benefit from them. The rest of the set still includes temporary data that was generated by template (because it matched most but not all of the countries), and before those lists can be moved to article space, all the temporary data needs to be checked for accuracy, and if incorrect it needs to be replaced with correct information.
The effort on the lists has been on 3 fronts:
Working on the lists in article space to complete them so they will be good examples for editors working on the rest of the set (during the contest).
Adding or correcting other data (fixing redlinks, filling in blanks, etc.). The main type of work participants in the contest will be doing. The reason we're doing this is to get a feel for it, to develop the fastest methods for each type of task, etc.
Improving the overall design and implenting changes on all 247 pages, whether in article space or not.
There has been some opposition to us running the contest based on edit counts or iterations. The concern is that we should reward quality work and not quantity, for fear of crappy edits done quickly without thought just to earn an award. I pointed out that the collection of pages are drafts in the Wikipedia namespace (therefore posing no danger to article space) and that most of the work needs to be done with power tools like AWB and Linky (which are specifically designed for repetitive volumnous work), but the reply was that we shouldn't set the precedent of rewarding barnstars for numerically-based tasks, and implied the threat of continuously MfD'ing the contest if we attempted to do so (like they did with the Awards Center - I was very surprised and disappointed that participants didn't step up to defend it). So we need to be careful in determining what exactly the awards will represent, and how they will be awarded.
Since rewarding iterations (passes with AWB on all of the pages in the set) are out, we really don't need the globe-in-stand (award we were working on) anymore. Two awards should suffice.
Once we get started with the contest, I'd like to kick the whole thing off with a round of medals for those dedicated few who have worked hard on the project so far.
Image copyright problem with Image:Unforgiven 1998.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Unforgiven 1998.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Image copyright problem with Image:WWEarmageddon06.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WWEarmageddon06.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Why can gays use the term Homophobic but Christians can't use the term Christaphobic?????????? whay do you ban me from using the word?
Also why can gays call a NAZI group a HATE GROUP but when I add that Bash Back who attacks christian churches a hate group you say it is trashing the site & you will ban me. BE FAIR OR ADMIT THAT YOU ARE A BIGOT who backs GAY SPEECH & bans Christian Speech. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.209.136 (talk) 01:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
wikipedia's censorship
I looked up Bash Back (The sodomite terrorist group that attacked the Church in Michigan) on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bash_Back) just to see what liberal bias they would have. Under the section "Antifascist action at 2008 Milwaukee Pridefest" Wakopedia says "In response, Bash Back! Milwaukee planned a confrontation of the hate group." the "hate group they are talking about is the NAZIs but then if the NAZIs are a hate group then Bash back must also be a hate group so I edited it to say "In response, The hate group Bash Back! Milwaukee planned a confrontation of the hate group."
Since they also didn't have any topic for the new terrorist attack on the church I added a few lines & was attacked by the Admins. So they added the following paragraph
2008 Disruption at Mt. Hope Church in Lansing, MI
Bash Back! members disrupted a Sunday sermon at Mt. Hope Church in Lansing, Michigan on November 9th, 2008. They dropped a banner in the church, threw thousands of fliers, made out in front of the congregation, yelled "Jesus was a Homo", pulled the fire alarm and initiated pro-gay chants. Mt. Hope is an Assemblies of God church which holds and promotes "ex-gay" events and preaches that homosexuality is a sin.
I edited the first line of the paragraph to read "Christaphobic Bash Back! members disrupted.... & added the following footnote
"Christphobia (from Greek Christós: Messiah; phóbos: fear, phobia) is an irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Christianity."
I took the defanition word for wors from Wakopedia's definition for Homophobia & just changed the Homo/Christos & Homo/ Christian parts.
For this I received the following note from the admin
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Bash Back. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Please maintain a neutral point of view. ukexpat (talk) 01:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:PokemonRubyEUBoxart.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PokemonRubyEUBoxart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:PokemonSapphireEUBoxart.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PokemonSapphireEUBoxart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Library
I looked at the project's library and noticed you own alot of TNA ppv dvds. Did you buy the hard justice special from last year, because that is a big collection? I also wonder why you haven't expanded none of the ppvs you own?--WillC08:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}