Four Noble Truths: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
POV tag - Bias towards western academics - Gombrich etc - to detriment of recognized and well-regarded Buddhist authors Walpola Rahula, Dalai Lama, etc. No details on view of authenticity of sutras. Rewrite of four truths in lede is WP:SYNTHESIS
Line 1: Line 1:
{{POV|talk=Short summary of the issues with this article|date=April 2017}}
[[File:Astasahasrika Prajnaparamita Dharmacakra Discourse.jpeg|thumb|right|240px|The Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths. [[Sanskrit]] manuscript. [[Nalanda|Nālandā]], [[Bihar]], [[India]].]]
[[File:Astasahasrika Prajnaparamita Dharmacakra Discourse.jpeg|thumb|right|240px|The Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths. [[Sanskrit]] manuscript. [[Nalanda|Nālandā]], [[Bihar]], [[India]].]]
{{Buddhist term
{{Buddhist term

Revision as of 20:52, 20 April 2017

The Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths. Sanskrit manuscript. Nālandā, Bihar, India.
Translations of
Four Noble Truths
Paliचत्तारि अरियसच्चानि
(cattāri ariyasaccāni)
Bengali[চতুরার্য সত্য
chôturarjô sôtyô] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help)
Burmeseသစ္စာလေးပါး
(MLCTS: θɪʔsà lé bá)
Chinese四聖諦(T) / 四圣谛(S)
(Pinyin: sìshèngdì)
Japanese四諦
(Rōmaji: shitai)
Korean사성제(四聖諦)
(sa-seong-je)
MongolianХутагт дөрвөн үнэн
(Khutagt durvun unen)
Sinhalaචතුරාර්ය සත්ය
Tibetanའཕགས་པའི་བདེན་པ་བཞི་
(Wylie: 'phags pa'i bden pa bzhi
THL: pakpé denpa shyi
)
Thaiอริยสัจสี่
(ariyasaj sii)
VietnameseTứ Diệu Đế( 四妙諦)
Glossary of Buddhism

The Four Noble Truths (Sanskrit: catvāri āryasatyāni; Pali: cattāri ariyasaccāni) are "the truths of the Noble Ones,"[1] the truths or realities which are understood by the "worthy ones"[web 1] who have attained Nirvana.[2][web 1] The truths are dukkha, the arising of dukkha, the cessation of dukkha, and the path leading to the cessation of dukkha.

In the Pali canon, the four truths appear in a "network of teachings,"[3] as part of "the entire dhamma matrix,"[4] which have to be taken together.[3] The four truths defy an exact definition, but refer to and express the basic orientation of Buddhism:[note 1] we crave and cling to impermanent states and things, which is dukkha,[5] "incapable of satisfying"[web 2] and painful.[6][7] This craving keeps us caught in samsara, the endless cycle of repeated rebirth and dying again, and the dukkha that comes with it. [note 2] But there is a way to end this cycle and reach real happiness,[13] [note 3] namely by letting of this craving, which can be accomplished by following the eightfold path.[note 1] The four truths refer to and express this basic orientation in a formulaic expression:[14][15][web 4]

  1. Dukkha, "incapable of satisfying,"[web 2] painful.[6][7] Life in this "mundane world,"[web 4] with its craving and clinging to impermanent states and things,[6] is dukkha,[5] unsatisfactory and painful;[web 2][6][7][8][16][web 4]
  2. Samudaya, the origination or arising of dukkha. Repeated life in this world, and its associated dukkha, arises with taṇhā, "thirst," craving for and clinging to these impermanent states and things. This craving and clinging produces karma which leads to renewed becoming, keeping us trapped in rebirth and renewed dissatisfaction;[note 4]
  3. Nirodha, the cessation of dukkha. By stopping this craving and clinging nirvana is attained,[19] no more karma is produced, and rebirth and dissatisfaction will no longer arise again;[note 5]
  4. Magga, the path to the cessation of, or liberation from dukkha. By following the Noble Eightfold Path, restraining oneself, cultivating discipline, and practicing mindfulness and meditation, craving and clinging will be stopped, and rebirth and dissatisfaction are ended.[20][21]

The four truths provide a conceptual framework for introducing and explaining Buddhist thought, which has to be personally understood or "experienced."[22][23] The formulation of the four truths, and their importance, developed over time, when prajna, or "liberating insight," came to be regarded as liberating in itself,[24][23] instead of the practice of dhyana.[24]

In the sutras, the four truths have both a symbolic and a propositional function.[25] They represent the awakening and liberation of the Buddha, but also the possibility of liberation for all sentient beings, describing how release from craving is to be reached.[26]

The position of the four truths in the Pali tradition developed throughout time.[27] The four truths became of central importance in the Theravada tradition,[28][29] which holds to the idea that insight into the four truths is liberating in itself.[30] They are less prominent in the Mahayana tradition, which emphasizes the higher aim of insight into sunyata and the Bodhisattva-path as a central elements in their teachings.[31] The Mahayana tradition reinterpreted the four truths to explain how a liberated being can still be "pervasively operative in this world."[32] Beginning with the exploration of Buddhism by western colonialists in the 19th century and the development of Buddhist modernism, they came to be often presented in the west as the central teaching of Buddhism.[33][34]

The four truths

The four truths are best known from their presentation in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, which contains two sets of the four truths,[35][14] while various other sets can be found in the Pali Canon.[23]

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta

According to the Buddhist tradition, the Buddha first taught the four noble truths in the very first teaching he gave after attaining enlightenment, as recorded in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta ("The Discourse That Sets Turning the Wheel of Truth").[web 5] Within this discourse, there are four key verses which present the four noble truths:

Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of suffering: birth is suffering, aging is suffering, illness is suffering, death is suffering; union with what is displeasing is suffering; separation from what is pleasing is suffering; not to get what one wants is suffering; in brief, the five aggregates subject to clinging are suffering.

Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the origin of suffering: it is this craving which leads to re-becoming, accompanied by delight and lust, seeking delight here and there; that is, craving for sensual pleasures, craving for becoming, craving for disbecoming.

Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the cessation of suffering: it is the remainderless fading away and cessation of that same craving, the giving up and relinquishing of it, freedom from it, non-reliance on it.

Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the way leading to the cessation of suffering: it is this noble eightfold path; that is, right view, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration.[web 6]

Basic set

According to Norman, the Pali canon contains various shortened forms of the four truths, the "mnemonic set," which were "intended to remind the hearer of the full form of the NTs."[36] The earliest form of the mnemonic set was "dukkham samudayo nirodho magga," without the reference to sacca[37] or arya,[38] which were later added to the formula.[38] This full set contains grammatical errors, but were considered correct by the Pali tradition, which didn't correct them.[38] According to K.R. Norman, the basic set is as follows:[39]

  • idam dukkham, "this is pain"
  • ayam dukkha-samudayo, "this is the origin of pain"
  • ayam dukkha-nirodha, "this is the cessation of pain"
  • ayam dukkha-nirodha-gamini patipada, "this is the path leading to the cessation of pain"

Etymology of the basic set

The four basic terms can be translated as follows:

  1. Dukkha - "incapable of satisfying,"[web 2] "the unsatisfactory nature and the general insecurity of all conditioned phenomena"; "painful."[6][7] Dukkha is most commonly translated as "suffering," which is an incorrect translation, since it refers to the ultimately unsatisfactory nature of temporary states and things, including pleasant but temporary experiences.[40] As opposite to sukha, "pleasure," it is better translated as "pain."[7]
  2. Samudaya - "origin", "source", "arising", "coming to existence";[web 7] "aggregate of the constituent elements or factors of any being or existence", "cluster", "coming together", "combination", "producing cause", "combination", "rising"[web 8]
  3. Nirodha - cessation; release; to confine;[41] "prevention, suppression, enclosing, restraint"[web 9]
  4. Magga - "path."[web 10] The key terms in the longer version of this expression, dukkha-nirodha-gamini Patipada, can be translated as follows:
    1. Gamini: leading to, making for[web 11]
    2. Patipada: road, path, way; the means of reaching a goal or destination[web 12]

Alternative formulations

L.S. Cousins notes that the four truths are not restricted to the well-known form where dukkha is the subject. Other forms take "the world, the arising of the world" or "the āsavas, the arising of the āsavas" as their subject. According to Cousins, "the well-known form is simply shorthand for all of the forms."[42] "The world" refers to the saṅkhāras, that is, all compounded things,[web 13] or to the six sense spheres.[43]

Truths for the noble ones

The Pali terms ariya sacca (Sanskrit: arya satya) are commonly translated as "noble truths". This translation is a convention started by the earliest translators of Buddhist texts into English. According to K.R. Norman, this is just one of several possible translations.[1] According to Paul Williams,[1]

[T]here is no particular reason why the Pali expression ariyasaccani should be translated as 'noble truths'. It could equally be translated as 'the nobles' truths', or 'the truths for nobles', or 'the nobilising truths', or 'the truths of, possessed by, the noble ones' [...] In fact the Pali expression (and its Sanskrit equivalent) can mean all of these, although the Pali commentators place 'the noble truths' as the least important in their understanding.[1]

The term "arya" was later added to the four truths.[38][23] The term ariya (Sanskrit: arya) can be translated as "noble", "not ordinary", "valuable", "precious".[note 6] "pure",[45] Paul Williams states:

The Aryas are the noble ones, the saints, those who have attained 'the fruits of the path', 'that middle path the Tathagata has comprehended which promotes sight and knowledge, and which tends to peace, higher wisdom, enlightenment, and Nibbana' (Narada 1980: 50 ).[46][note 7]

The term sacca (Sanskrit: satya) is a central term in Indian thought and religion. It is typically translated as "truth"; but it also means "that which is in accord with reality", or "reality". The four noble truths are not asserted as propositional truths or creeds; rather, they are understood as "true things" or "realities" that function as a convenient conceptual framework for making sense of Buddhist thought:.[48]

The word satya (Pali sacca) can certainly mean truth, but it might equally be rendered as ‘real’ or ‘actual thing’. That is, we are not dealing here with propositional truths with which we must either agree or disagree, but with four ‘true things’ or ‘realities’ whose nature, we are told, the Buddha finally understood on the night of his awakening.[48][note 8]

According to K.R. Norman, probably the best translation is "the truth[s] of the noble one (the Buddha)."[1] It is a statement of how things are seen by a Buddha, how things really are when seen correctly. It is the truthful way of seeing,[note 9] Through not seeing things this way, and behaving accordingly, we suffer.[1][note 10]

Dukkha and its ending

The Dharmacakra, often used to represent the Noble Eightfold Path

According to Anderson, a long recognized feature of the Theravada canon is that it lacks an "overarching and comprehensive structure of the path to nibbana."[50] The sutras form a network or matrix, and the four truths appear within this "network of teachings," which have to be taken together.[3] Within this network, "the four noble truths are one doctrine among others and are not particularly central,"[3] but are a part of "the entire dhamma matrix."[4] The four noble truths are be set and learnt in that network, learning "how the various teachings intersect with each other,"[51] and refer to the various Buddhist techniques, which are all explicitly and implicitly part of the passages which refer to the four truths.[52] According to Anderson,

There is no single way of understanding the teachings: one teaching may be used to explain another in one passage; the relationship may be reversed or altered in other talks.[4]

The four truths defy an exact definition, but refer to and express the basic orientation of Buddhism: clinging and craving to temporary states and things is ultimately unsatisfactory and painful, dukkha,[13] and leads to repeated rebirth and "redeath."[note 11] By following the Buddhist path, craving and clinging can be confined, peace of mind can be attained, and the resulting cycle of repeated rebirth and "redeath." will be stopped.[note 1]

The truth of dukkha, "incapable of satisfying,"[web 2] "painful,"[6][7][note 12] is the basic insight that life in this "mundane world," with its clinging and craving to impermanent states and things"[6] is dukkha, and unsatisfactory.[8][16][web 4] We expect happiness from states and things which are impermanent, and therefore cannot attain real happiness.

Dukkha arises when we crave (Pali: tanha) and cling to these changing phenomena. The clinging and craving produces karma, which ties us to samsara, the round of death and rebirth.[64][web 18][note 13] Craving includes kama-tanha, craving for sense-pleasures; bhava-tanha, craving to continue the cycle of life and death, including rebirth; and vibhava-tanha, craving to not experience the world and painful feelings.[64][67][68]

Dukkha ceases, or can be confined,[41] when craving and clinging cease or are confined. This also means that no more karma is being produced, and rebirth ends.[note 5] Cessation is nirvana, "blowing out," and peace of mind.[70][71][72] Joseph Goldstein explains:

Ajahn Buddhadasa, a well-known Thai master of the last century, said that when village people in India were cooking rice and waiting for it to cool, they might remark, "Wait a little for the rice to become nibbana". So here, nibbana means the cool state of mind, free from the fires of the defilements. As Ajahn Buddhadasa remarked, "The cooler the mind, the more Nibbana in that moment". We can notice for ourselves relative states of coolness in our own minds as we go through the day.[72]

By following the Buddhist path to moksha, liberation,[55] one starts to disengage from craving and clinging to impermanent states and things. The term "path" is usually taken to mean the Noble Eightfold Path, but other versions of "the path" can also be found in the Nikayas.[73] The Theravada tradition regards insight into the four truths as liberating in itself.[30]

The well-known eightfold path consists of the understanding that this world is floating and unsatisfying, and how craving keeps us tied to this floating world; a friendly and compassionate attitude to others; a correct way of behaving; mind-control, which means not feeding on negative thoughts, and nurturing positive thoughts; constant awareness of the feelings and responses which arise; and the practice of dhyana, meditation.[73] The tenfold path adds the right (liberating) insight, and liberation from rebirth.[73][note 14]

The four truths are to be internalised, and understood or "experienced" personally, to turn them into a lived reality.[22][23]

Ending rebirth

Tibetan Bhavacakra or "Wheel of Life."

The four truths describe dukkha and its ending as a means to reach peace of mind in this life, but also as a means to end rebirth. Some contemporary teachers tend to explain the four truths psychologically, by taking dukkha to mean mental anquish in addition to the physical pain of life,[74][75] and interpreting the four truths as a means to attain happiness in this life.[76] Yet, though happiness is part of the way, it is not the goal.[web 19][note 15] Spiro notes that "the Buddhist message is not simply a psychological message," but an eschatological message.[18]

As Geoffrey Samuel notes, "the Four Noble Truths [...] describe the knowledge needed to set out on the path to liberation from rebirth."[55] By understanding the four truths, one can stop this clinging and craving, attain a pacified mind, and be freed from this cycle of rebirth and redeath.[web 4][8][note 1] Patrick Olivelle explains that moksha is a central concept in Indian religions, and "literally means freedom from samsara."[web 17][note 16] Melvin E. Spiro further explains that "desire is the cause of suffering because desire is the cause of rebirth."[18] When desire ceases, rebirth and its accompanying suffering ceases.[18][note 17] Peter Harvey explains:

Once birth has arisen, ‘ageing and death’, and various other dukkha states follow. While saying that birth is the cause of death may sound rather simplistic, in Buddhism it is a very significant statement; for there is an alternative to being born. This is to attain Nirvāna, so bringing an end to the process of rebirth and redeath. Nirvāna is not subject to time and change, and so is known as the ‘unborn’; as it is not born it cannot die, and so it is also known as the ‘deathless’. To attain this state, all phenomena subject to birth – the khandhas and nidānas – must be transcended by means of non-attachment.[77]

The last sermon, the Maha-parinibbana Sutta (Last Days of the Buddha, Digha Nikaya 16)", states it as follows:

[...] it is through not realizing, through not penetrating the Four Noble Truths that this long course of birth and death has been passed through and undergone by me as well as by you [...] But now, bhikkhus, that these have been realized and penetrated, cut off is the craving for existence, destroyed is that which leads to renewed becoming, and there is no fresh becoming.[web 20]

Medical analogy

The model of the four truths may be an analogy with classical Indian medicine, in which the four truths function as a medical diagnosis, and the Buddha is presented as a physician:[78][79][80]

  1. The truth of dukkha: identifying the illness and the nature of the illness (the diagnosis)
  2. The truth of origin: identifying the causes of the illness
  3. The truth of cessation: identifying a cure for the illness (the prognosis)
  4. The truth of the path: recommending a treatment for the illness that can bring about a cure (the prescription)

This analogy is said to emphasize the compassion of the Buddha—that he was motivated by the desire to relieve the suffering of beings.[81]

Historical development

Symbolic and propositional function

According to Anderson, the four truths have both a symbolic and a propositional function. As a symbol, they refer to the possibility of awakening, as represented by the Buddha:

[W]hen the four noble truths are regarded in the canon as the first teaching of the Buddha, they function as a view or doctrine that assumes a symbolic function. Where the four noble truths appear in the guise of a religious symbol in the Sutta-pitaka and the Vinaya-pitaka of the Pali canon, they represent the enlightenment experience of the Buddha and the possibility of enlightenment for all Buddhists within the cosmos.[82]

As a proposition, they describe how release from craving is to be reached:[29]

... the four noble truths are truly set apart within the body of the Buddha's teachings, not because they are by definition sacred, but because they are both a symbol and a doctrine and transformative within the sphere of right view. As one doctrine among others, the four noble truths make explicit the structure within which one should seek enlightenment; as a symbol, the four noble truths evoke the possibility of enlightenment. As both, they occupy not only a central but a singular position within the Theravada canon and tradition.[29]

Development

Anderson notes that "the four truths are recognized as perhaps the most important teaching of the Buddha."[82] Yet, she also notes that as early as 1935 Carolyn Augusta Foley noted that for a teaching so central to Theravada Buddhism, it was missing from critical passages in the Pali canon.[83]

Growing importance

According to Bronkhorst, the four truths may already have been formulated in earliest Buddhism, but did not have the central place they acquired in later buddhism.[27] According to Anderson, only by the time of the commentaries, in the fifth century CE, did the four truths come to be identified in the Theravada tradition as the central teaching of the Buddha.[28][note 18] According to Anderson,

... the four noble truths were probably not part of the earliest strata of what came to be recognized as Buddhism, but that they emerged as a central teaching in a slightly later period that still preceded the final redactions of the various Buddhist canons.[84]

Stephen Batchelor notes that the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta contains incongruities, and states that

The First Discourse cannot be treated as a verbatim transcript of what the Buddha taught in the Deer Park, but as a document that has evolved over an unspecified period of time until it reached the form in which it is found today in the canons of the different Buddhist schools.[85]

According to Feer and Anderson, the four truths probably entered the Sutta Pitaka from the Vinaya, the rules for monastic order.[86][note 19] They were first added to enlightenment-stories which contain the Four Jhanas, replacing terms for "liberating insight".[89][note 20] From there they were added to the biographical stories of the Buddha:[92][note 21]

Substituting "liberating insight"

Information of the oldest teachings of Buddhism, such as on the Four Noble Truths, has been obtained by analysis of the oldest texts, but is a matter of dispute.[22][91][90][94] According to Schmithausen, three positions held by scholars of Buddhism can be distinguished:[95]

  1. "Stress on the fundamental homogeneity and substantial authenticity of at least a considerable part of the Nikayic materials;"[note 22]
  2. "Scepticism with regard to the possibility of retrieving the doctrine of earliest Buddhism;"[note 23]
  3. "Cautious optimism in this respect."[note 24]

Inconsistencies in the oldest texts may reveal developments in the oldest teachings.[101] Scholars have noted such inconsistencies in the presentations of the Buddha's enlightenment, and the Buddhist path to liberation, in the oldest sutras. These inconsistencies show that the Buddhist teachings evolved, either during the lifetime of the Buddha, or there-after.[note 25] According to the Japanese scholar Ui, the four truths are not the earliest representation of the Buddha's enlightenment. Instead, they are a rather late theory on the content of the Buddha's enlightenment.[102] According to Vetter and Bronkhorst, the earliest Buddhist path consisted of a set of practices which culminate in the practice of dhyana, leading to a calm of mind which according to Vetter is the liberation which is being sought.[103][104]

Later on, "liberating insight," as exemplified by prajna, or the insight in the "four truths," came to be regarded as equally liberating.[105][104] According to Vetter and Bronkhorst, this happened in response to other religious groups in India who held that a liberating insight was indispensable for liberation from rebirth (moksha).[106][107][note 26] According to Bronkhorst,

...the accounts which include the Four Noble Truths had a completely different conception of the process of liberation than the one which includes the Four Dhyanas and the destruction of the intoxicants.[109]

The ideas on what exactly constituted this "liberating insight" was not fixed but developed over time.[103][110] In the Nikayas the four truths are given as the "liberating insight" which constituted the awakening, or "enlightenment" of the Buddha. When he understood these truths he was "enlightened" and liberated,[note 27] as reflected in Majjhima Nikaya 26:42: "his taints are destroyed by his seeing with wisdom."[114] Typically the four truths refer here to the eightfold path as the means to gain liberation while the attainment of insight into the four truths is portrayed as liberating in itself.[22]

According to Bronkhorst, in earliest Buddhism the four truths did not serve as a description of "liberating insight".[27] Initially the term prajna served to denote this "liberating insight." Later on, prajna was replaced in the suttas by the "four truths."[24][23] This happened in those texts where "liberating insight" was preceded by the four jhanas, and where this practice of the four jhanas then culminates in "liberating insight."[115] Bronkhorst also notices that the conception of what exactly this "liberating insight" was developed throughout time. Whereas originally it may not have been specified, later on the four truths served as such, to be superseded by pratityasamutpada, and still later, in the Hinayana schools, by the doctrine of the non-existence of a substantial self or person.[116] And Schmithausen states that still other descriptions of this "liberating insight" exist in the Buddhist canon:

"that the five Skandhas are impermanent, disagreeable, and neither the Self nor belonging to oneself";[note 28] "the contemplation of the arising and disappearance (udayabbaya) of the five Skandhas";[note 29] "the realisation of the Skandhas as empty (rittaka), vain (tucchaka) and without any pith or substance (asaraka).[note 30][117]

An example of this substitution, and its consequences, is Majjhima Nikaya 36:42-43, which gives an account of the awakening of the Buddha.[118]

Popularisation in the west

Anderson notes that there is a strong tendency within scholarship to present the four truths as the most essential teaching of Buddhism.[34] According to Anderson, the four truths have been simplified and popularized in western writings, due to "the colonial project of gaining control over Buddhism."[119][120] According to Crosby, the Buddhist teachings are reduced to a "simple, single rationalized account," which has parallels in the reinterpretation of the Buddha in western literature.[119]

The presentation of the four truths as one of the most important teachings of the Buddha "has been [done] to reduce the four noble truths to a teaching that is accessible, pliable, and therefore readily appropriated by non-Buddhists."[121] There is a great variety of teachings in the Buddhist literature, which may be bewildering for those who are unaware of this variety.[34] The four truths are easily accessible in this regard, and are "readily [understood] by those outside the Buddhist traditions."[122] For example Walpola Rahula's What the Buddha Taught, a widely used introductory text for non-Buddhists, uses the four truths as a framework to present an overview of the Buddhist teachings.[121]

According to Harris, the British in the 19th century crafted new representations of Buddhism and the Buddha.[123] 19th century missionaries studied Buddhism, to be more effective in their missionary efforts.[124] The Buddha was de-mystified, and reduced from a "superhuman" to a "compassionate, heroic human," serving "western historical method and the missionary agenda of situating the Buddha firmly below the divine."[123] The four truths were discovered by the British by reading the Buddhist texts, and were not immediately granted the central position they later received.[123]

The writings of British missionaries show a growing emphasis on the four truths as being central to Buddhism, with somewhat different presentations of them.[33][note 31] This colonial project had a strong influence on some strands of Buddhism, culminating in socalled Protestant Buddhism, which incorporated several essentially Protestant attitudes regarding religion, such as the emphasis on written texts.[125][126][note 32] According to Gimello, Rahula's book is an example of this Protestant Budhism, and "was created in an accommodating response to western expectations, and in nearly diametrical opposition to Buddhism as it had actually been practised in traditional Theravada."[note 33]

According to Anderson, those scholars who did not place the four truths at the center of Buddhism, either "located the four truths in a fuller reading of the Theravada canon and the larger context of South Asian literature," or "located the teaching within an experience of Buddhism as practiced in a contemporary setting."[128] According to Anderson, "these autors suggest a more complex reading of the four noble truths than those who locate the teaching as the key to or as a crucial element within the grand scheme of Buddhism."[128]

Appearance within the discourses

The developing Buddhist tradition inserted the four truths, using various formulations, at various sutras.[23] They are being used both as a symbol of all dhammas and the Buddha's awakening, and as a set of propositions which function within a matrix of teachings.[129] According to Anderson, there is no single way to understand the teachings; one teaching may be used to explain another teaching, and vice versa. The teachings form a network, which should be apprehended as such to understand how the various teachings intersect with each other.[130]

Symbolic function

Mahasaccaka Sutta

The Mahasaccaka Sutta ("The Greater Discourse to Saccaka", Majjhima Nikaya 36) gives one of several versions of the Buddha's way to liberation.[note 34] He attains the three knowledges, namely knowledge of his former lifes, knowledge of death and rebirh, and knowledge of the destruction of the taints,[note 35] the Four Noble Truths.[131] After going through the four dhyanas, and gaining the first two knowledges, the story proceeds:

I directed my mind to the knowledge of the destruction of the intoxicants [suffering ... origin ... cessation ... path] [intoxicants (asava) ... origin ... cessation ... path] My mind was liberated [...] the knowledge arose that it was liberated.[118]

Bronkhorst dismisses the first two knowledges as later additions, and proceeds to notice that the recognition of the intoxicants is modelled on the four truths. According to Bronkhorst, those are added the bridge the original sequence of "I directed my mind to the knowledge of the destruction of the intoxicants. My mind was liberated", which was interrupted by the addition of the four truths. Bronkhorst points out that those do not fit here, since the four truths culminate in the knowledge of the path to be followed, while the Buddha himself is already liberated at that point.[132]

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
A relief depicting the first discourse of the Buddha, from the 2nd century (Kushan).[web 21] The Walters Art Museum. The Buddha's hand can be seen at right.

According to the Buddhist tradition, the first talk of Gautama Buddha after he attained enlightenment is recorded in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta ("Setting in Motion the Wheel of Dhamma", Samyutta Nikaya 56.11). According to Anderson, following Norman, the four truths originally were not part of this sutta, and were later added in some versions.[133]

Bronkhorst notes that this "first sermon" is recorded in several sutras, with important variations.[109] In the Vinaya texts, and in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta which was influenced by the Vinaya texts, the four truths are included, and Kondañña is enlightened[109][134] when the "vision of Dhamma"[135] arises in him: "whatever is subject to origination is all subject to cessation."[note 36] Yet, in the Ariyapariyesanā Sutta ("The Noble Search", Majjhima Nikaya 26) the four truths are not included,[note 37] and the Buddha gives the five ascetics personal instructions in turn, two or three of them, while the others go out begging for food. The versions of the "first sermon" which include the four truths, such as the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, omit this instruction, showing that

...the accounts which include the Four Noble Truths had a completely different conception of the process of liberation than the one which includes the Four Dhyanas and the subsequent destruction of the intoxicants.[109]

According to Bronkhorst, this too indicates that the four truths were later added to earlier descriptions of liberation by practicing the four dhyanas, which originally was thought to be sufficient for the destruction of the arsavas.[109]

The Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta provides details on three stages in the understanding of each truth, for a total of twelve insights. According to Bronkhorst, they are probably also a later addition, born out of unease with the substitution of the general term "prajna" for the more specific "four truths".[139] The three stages for understanding each truth are:[140][141][142][143][144]

  1. sacca-ñāṇa - knowing the nature of the truth (e.g., acknowledgement, view, reflection)
  2. kicca-ñāṇa - knowing what needs to be done in connection with that truth (e.g., practice; motivation; directly experiencing)
  3. kata-ñāṇa - accomplishing what needs to be done (e.g., result, full understanding, knowing)

These three stages of understanding are emphasized particularly in the Theravada tradition, but they are also recognized by some contemporary Mahayana teachers.[144][145]

Maha-parinibbana Sutta

According to the Buddhist tradition, the Maha-parinibbana Sutta (Last Days of the Buddha, Digha Nikaya 16) was given near the end of the Buddha's life. This sutta "gives a good general idea of the Buddha's Teaching:"[web 16]

And the Blessed One addressed the bhikkhus, saying: "Bhikkhus, it is through not realizing, through not penetrating the Four Noble Truths that this long course of birth and death has been passed through and undergone by me as well as by you. What are these four? They are the noble truth of suffering; the noble truth of the origin of suffering; the noble truth of the cessation of suffering; and the noble truth of the way to the cessation of suffering. But now, bhikkhus, that these have been realized and penetrated, cut off is the craving for existence, destroyed is that which leads to renewed becoming, and there is no fresh becoming."

Thus it was said by the Blessed One. And the Happy One, the Master, further said:

Through not seeing the Four Noble Truths,
Long was the weary path from birth to birth.
When these are known, removed is rebirth's cause,
The root of sorrow plucked; then ends rebirth.

Propositional function

Majjhima Nikaya 149:3 plus 149:9 give an alternative presentation of the four truths:

When one abides inflamed by lust, fettered, infatuated, contemplating gratification, [...] [o]ne's bodily and mental troubles increase, one's bodily and mental torments increase, one's bodily and mental fevers increase, and one experiences bodily and mental suffering.

...when one does not know and see as it actually is [the feeling] felt as pleasant or painful or neither painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact as condition, then one is inflamed by lust for the eye, for forms, for eye-consciousness, for eye-contact, for [the feeling] felt as pleasant or painful or neither painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact as condition [repeated for the nose, tongue, body, mind].

When one abides uninflamed by lust, unfettered, uninfatuated, contemplating danger [...] one's craving [...] is abandoned. One's bodily and mental troubles are abandoned, one's bodily and mental torments are abandoned, one's bodily and mental fevers are abandoned, and one experiences bodily and mental pleasure.

...when one knows and see as it actually is [the feeling] felt as pleasant or painful or neither painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact as condition, then one is not inflamed by lust for the eye, for forms, for eye-consciousness, for eye-contact, for [the feeling] felt as pleasant or painful or neither painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact as condition [repeated for the nose, tongue, body, mind].[146]

Emphasis within different traditions

Early Indian Buddhism

The Ekavyāvahārika sect emphasized the transcendence of the Buddha, asserting that he was eternally enlightened and essentially non-physical. According to the Ekavyāvahārika, the words of the Buddha were spoken with one transcendent meaning, and the Four Noble Truths are to be understood simultaneously in one moment of insight.[147] According to the Mahīśāsaka sect, the Four Noble Truths should be meditated upon simultaneously.[148]

Theravada

According to Carol Anderson, the four truths have "a singular position within the Theravada canon and tradition."[29] The Theravada tradition regards insight in the four truths as liberating in itself. This liberation can be attained in one single moment, when the four truths are understood together.[30] Within the Theravada tradition, great emphasis is placed upon reading and contemplating The Discourse That Sets Turning the Wheel of Truth, and other suttas, as a means to study the four noble truths and put them into practice.[149] For example, Ajahn Sumedho states:

The Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, the Buddha's teaching on the Four Noble Truths, has been the main reference that I have used for my practice over the years. It is the teaching we used in our monastery in Thailand. The Theravada school of Buddhism regards this sutta as the quintessence of the teachings of the Buddha. This one sutta contains all that is necessary for understanding the Dhamma and for enlightenment."[150]

According to Walpola Rahula, the cessation of dukkha is nirvana, the summum bonum of Buddhism.[web 22] According to Bikkhu Bodhi, the "elimination of craving culminates not only in the extinction of sorrow, anguish and distress, but in the unconditioned freedom of nibbana, which is won with the ending of reapeated rebirth."[151] Hicks notes that there are two Theravada schools of thought on the nature of nirvana and the question what happens with the Arhat after death. According to the "minimal Theravada interpretation", nirvana is a psychological state, which ends with the dissolution of the body and the total extinction of existence.[152][153] According to the "orthodox Theravada interpretation," nirvana is a transcendent reality, with which the self unites.[153] According to Walpola Rahula, nirvana is "Absolute Truth," which simply is,[web 22][note 38] while Jayatilleke also speaks of "the attainment of an ultimate reality."[155]

Spiro notes that most (lay) Theravada Buddhists do not aspire for nirvana and total extinction, but for a pleasurable rebirth in heaven.[157] Spiro notes that this presents a "serious conflict," since the Buddhist texts and teaching "describe life as suffering and hold up nirvana as the summum bonum."[158] In response to this deviation, "monks and others emphasize that the hope for nirvana is the only legitimate action for Buddhist action."[158] Walpola Rahula, for example, states that Buddhism "shows you the way to perfect freedom, peace, tranquility and happiness,"[web 24] which is nirvana.[web 22] Nevertheless, Spiro notes that most Burmese lay Buddhists do not aspire for the extinction of existence which is nirvana.[158]

According to B.R. Ambedkar, the Indian Buddhist Dalit leader, the four truths were not part of the original teachings of the Buddha, but a later aggregation, due to Hindu influences.[159] According to Ambedkar, total cessation of suffering is an illusion; yet, the Buddhist Middle Path aims at the reduction of suffering and the maximalisation of happiness, balancing both sorrow and happiness.[160]

Mahayana

The four truths are less prominent in the Mahayana traditions, which emphasize insight into sunyata and the Bodhisattva-path as a central elements in their teachings.[31] If the sutras in general are studied at all, it is through various Mahayana commentaries.[161]

Makransky notes that the Mahayana Bodhisattva ideal created tensions in the explanation of the four truths.[162] In the Mahayana view, a fully enligtened Buddha does not leave samsara, but remains in the world out of compassion with all sentient beings.[163] The four truths, which aim at ending samsara, do not provide a doctrinal basis for this view, and had to be reinterpreted.[163] In the old view, klesas and karma are the cause of prolonged existence. According to Makransky, "[t]o remove those causes was, at physical death, to extinquish one's conditioned existence, hence to end forever one's participation in the world (Third Truth)."[163] According to Makransky, the question how a liberated being can stiil be "pervasively operative in this world" has been "a seminal source of ongoing doctrinal tension over Buddhahood trhoughout the history of the Mahayana in India and Tibet."[32]

Tibetan Buddhism

Atisha, in his Bodhipathapradīpa ("A Lamp for the Path to Awakening"), which forms the basis for the Lamrim tradition, discerns three levels of motivation for Buddhist practitioners.[164] At the beginning level of motivation, one strives toward a better life in samsara.[164] At the intermediate level, one strives to a liberation from existence in samsara and the end of all suffering.[165] At the highest level of motivation, one strives after the liberation of all living beings.[164] In his commentary on the text, Tsenshap Serkong Rinpochee explains that the four truths are to be meditated upon as a means of practice for the intermediate level.[166]

According to Geshe Tashi Tsering, within Tibetan Buddhism, the four noble truths are studied as part of the Bodhisattva path. They are explained in Mahayana commentaries such as the Abhisamayalamkara, a summary of and commentary on the Prajna Paramitra sutras, where they form part of the lower Hinayana teachings. The truth of the path (the fourth truth) is traditionally presented according to a progressive formula of five paths, rather than as the eightfold path presented in Theravada.[167] According to Tsering, the study of the four truths is combined with the study of the sixteen characteristics of the four noble truths.[168]

Some contemporary Tibetan Buddhist teachers have provided commentary on the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta and the noble eightfold path when presenting the dharma to Western students.[169][170][171]

Nichiren Buddhism

Nichiren Buddhism is based on the teaching of the Japanese priest and teacher Nichiren, who believed that the Lotus Sūtra contained the essence of all of Gautama Buddha's teachings.[web 25] The third chapter of the Lotus Sutra states that the Four Noble Truths was the early teaching of the Buddha, while the Dharma of the Lotus is the "most wonderful, unsurpassed great Dharma."[web 26] The teachings on the four noble truths are a provisional teaching, which Shakyamuni Buddha taught according to the people’s capacity, while the Lotus Sutra is a direct statement of Shakyamuni’s own enlightenment.[web 27]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d Graham Harvey: "Siddhartha Gautama found an end to rebirth in this world of suffering. His teachings, known as the dharma in Buddhism, can be summarized in the Four Noble truths."[54] Geoffrey Samuel (2008): "The Four Noble Truths [...] describe the knowledge needed to set out on the path to liberation from rebirth."[55] See also [18][56][15][8][57][16][54][58][web 4][web 14]

    The Theravada tradition holds that insight into these four truths is liberating in itself.[30] This is reflected in the Pali canon.[59] According to Donald Lopez, "The Buddha stated in his first sermon that when he gained absolute and intuitive knowledge of the four truths, he achieved complete enlightenment and freedom from future rebirth."[web 4]

    The Maha-parinibbana Sutta also refers to this liberation.[web 15] Carol Anderson: "The second passage where the four truths appear in the Vinaya-pitaka is also found in the Mahaparinibbana-sutta (D II 90-91). Here, the Buddha explains that it is by not understanding the four truths that rebirth continues."[60] Mahaparinibbana-sutta:

    Through not seeing the Four Noble Truths,
    Long was the weary path from birth to birth.
    When these are known, removed is rebirth's cause,
    The root of sorrow plucked; then ends rebirth.[web 16]

    On the meaning of moksha as liberation from rebirth, see Patrick Olivelle in the Encyclopædia Britannica.[web 17]
  2. ^ On samsara, rebirth and redeath:

    * accesstoisight.org: "Because of our ignorance (avijja) of these Noble Truths, because of our inexperience in framing the world in their terms, we remain bound to samsara, the wearisome cycle of birth, aging, illness, death, and rebirth."[web 3]

    * Paul Williams: "All rebirth is due to karma and is impermanent. Short of attaining enlightenment, in each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with the completely impersonal causal nature of one's own karma. The endless cycle of birth, rebirth, and redeath, is samsara."[8]

    * Buswell and Lopez on "rebirth": "An English term that does not have an exact correlate in Buddhist languages, rendered instead by a range of technical terms, such as the Sanskrit PUNARJANMAN (lit. "birth again") and PUNABHAVAN (lit. "re-becoming"), and, less commonly, the related PUNARMRTYU (lit. "redeath")."[9]

    See also Perry Schmidt-Leukel (2006) pages 32-34,[10] John J. Makransky (1997) p.27.[11] for the use of the term "redeath." The term Agatigati or Agati gati (plus a few other terms) is generally translated as 'rebirth, redeath'; see any Pali-English dictionary; e.g. pages 94-95 of Rhys Davids & William Stede, where they list five Sutta examples with rebirth and re-death sense.[12]
  3. ^ Warder refers to Majjhima Nikaya 75: "I gave up the desire for pleasure [...] I did not long for them [...] Now what was the cause? That delight, Māgandiya, which is apart from pleasures, apart, from bad principles, which even stands completely surpassing divine happiness, enjoying that delight I did not long for inferior ones, did not take pleasure in them."[13]
  4. ^ Perry Schmidt-Leukel: "Thirst can be temporarily quenched but never brought to final stillness. It is in this sense that thirst is the cause of suffering, duhkha. And because of this thirst, the sentient beings remain bound to samsara, the cycle of constant rebirth and redeath: it is this craving which leads to renewed existence as the Second Noble Truth."[10]
    See also Williams & Wynne,[17] Spiro.[18]
  5. ^ a b Ending rebirth:
    * Graham Harvey: "The Third Noble Truth is nirvana. The Buddha tells us that an end to suffering is possible, and it is nirvana. Nirvana is a "blowing out," just as a candle flame is extinguished in the wind, from our lives in samsara. It connotes an end to rebirth"[54]
    * Spiro: "The Buddhist message then, as I have said, is not simply a psychological message, i.e. that desire is the cause of suffering because unsatisfied desire produces frustration. It does contain such a message to be sure; but more importantly it is an eschatological message. Desire is the cause of suffering because desire is the cause of rebirth; and the extinction of desire leads to deliverance from suffering because it signals release from the Wheel of Rebirth."[18]
    * John J. Makransky: "The third noble truth, cessation (nirodha) or nirvana, represented the ultimate aim of Buddhist practice in the Abhidharma traditions: the state free from the conditions that created samsara. Nirvana was the ultimate and final state attained when the supramundane yogic path had been completed. It represented salvation from samsara precisely because it was understood to comprise a state of complete freedom from the chain of samsaric causes and conditions, i.e., precisely because it was unconditioned (asamskrta)."[15]
    * Walpola Rahula: "Let us consider a few definitions and descriptions of Nirvana as found in the original Pali texts [...] 'It is the complete cessation of that very thirst (tanha), giving it up, renouncing it, emancipation from it, detachment from it.' [...] 'The abandoning and destruction of craving for these Five Aggregates of Attachment: that is the cessation of dukkha. [...] 'The Cessation of Continuity and becoming (Bhavanirodha) is Nibbana.'"[69]
  6. ^ Ajahn Sucitto states: "So the four truths (ariya sacca) are generally called “noble” truths, although one might also translate ariya as “precious.” "[44]
  7. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering: "The modifier noble means truth as perceived by arya beings, those beings who have had a direct realization of emptiness or selflessness. Noble means something seen by arya beings as it really is, and in this case it is four recognitions—suffering, origin, cessation, and path. Arya beings see all types of suffering—physical and mental, gross and subtle—exactly as they are, as suffering. For people like us, who do not have the direct realization of emptiness, although we may understand certain levels of physical and mental experiences as suffering, it is impossible for us to see all the levels of suffering for what they are. Instead we may see some things as desirable when in truth they are suffering.[47]
  8. ^ Gethin states: The word satya (Pali sacca) can certainly mean truth, but it might equally be rendered as 'real' or 'actual thing'. That is, we are not dealing here with propositional truths with which we must either agree or disagree, but with four 'true things' or 'realities' whose nature, we are told, the Buddha finally understood on the night of his awakening. [...] This is not to say that the Buddha's discourses do not contain theoretical statements of the nature of suffering, its cause, its cessation, and the path to its cessation, but these descriptions function not so much as dogmas of the Buddhist faith as a convenient conceptual framework for making sense of Buddhist thought.[48]
  9. ^ '"Truth", satya (Sanskrit), sacca (Pali), derived from sat, being, how it is.[1]
  10. ^ Contemporary Buddhist teacher Mingyur Rinpoche describes the four arya satya as "Four Pure Insights into the Way Things Are".[45] Contemporary scholar Peter Harvey translates arya satya as "True Realities for the Spiritually Ennobled".[49]
  11. ^ Mahasatipatthana-sutta: "And what, bhkkhus, is the noble truth that is the arising of pain? This is craving that leads to rebirth."[53] See also punarmrityu
  12. ^ Dukkha is most commonly translated as "suffering," which is an incorrect translation, since it refers to the ultimately unsatisfactory nature of temporary states and things, including pleasant but temporary experiences.[40] As opposite to sukha, "pleasure," it is better translated as "pain."[7] See also:
    • Malcolm Huxter: "dukkha (unsatisfactoriness or suffering)..."[61]
    • Carole Anderson: "(...) the three characteristics of samsara/sankhara (the realm of rebirth): anicca (impermance), dukkha (pain) and anatta (no-self)."[[#cite_note-FOOTNOTEAnderson20131,_22_with_note_4_*_Harvey_(2015)'"`UNIQ--ref-000000A6-QINU`"'-91|[63]]]
  13. ^ This explanation is more common in commentaries on the Four Noble Truths within the Theravada tradition: e.g. Ajahn Sucitta (2010); Ajahn Sumedho (ebook); Rahula (1974).

    Schmitthausen, as cited by James egge,[65] notes that the four truths do not mention karma, but solely declare craving to be the cause of misery and rebirth.[66]
  14. ^ Another variant, which may be condensed to the eightfold or tenfold path, starts with a Tathagatha entering this world. A layman hears his teachings, decides to leave the life of a householder, starts living according to the moral precepts, guards his sense-doors, practices mindfulness and the four jhanas, gains the three knowledges, understands the Four Noble Truths and destroys the taints, and perceives that he's liberated.[73]
  15. ^ Fake Buddha Quotes: "Now you might think that since suffering is what we’re trying to get away from, the goal we’re heading toward must be happiness. But in Buddhism that’s not the case. Happiness (sukha) is not the goal. The goal of Buddhism is something more like “peace” (santi), which is something more profound and worthy than happiness. The Buddha recognized that a certain kind of suffering (dukkha-dukkhata) is unavoidable, and that what we really need is to develop the quality of equanimity, which allows us to experience suffering and happiness without lamentation or elation. Happiness is important on the path, though. Many formulations of the path include sukha (happiness, or bliss). For example in the 12-fold series of transcendental dependent origination, we move through the following experiences [...] happiness, sukha, sits right at the middle of this list. It’s clearly not the goal, although it is vitally important that we learn how to be happy.[web 19]
  16. ^ Patrick Olivelle: "Moksha, also spelled mokṣa, also called mukti, in Indian philosophy and religion, liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth (samsara). Derived from the Sanskrit word muc ("to free"), the term moksha literally means freedom from samsara. This concept of liberation or release is shared by a wide spectrum of religious traditions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.[web 17]
  17. ^ Melvin E. Spiro: "Desire is the cause of suffering because desire is the cause of rebirth; and the extinction of desire leads to deliverance from suffering because it signals release from the Wheel of Rebirth."[18]
  18. ^ Anderson: "However, the four noble truths do not always appear in stories of the Buddha's enlightenment where we might expect to find them. This feature may indicate that the four noble truths emerged into the canonical tradition at a particular point and slowly became recognized as the first teaching of the Buddha. Speculations about early and late teachings must be made relative to other passages in the Pali canon because of a lack of supporting extratextual evidence. Nonetheless, it is still possible to suggest a certain historical development of the four noble truths within the Pali canon. What we will find is a doctrine that came to be identified as the central teaching of the Buddha by the time of the commentaries in the fifth century C.E."[28]
  19. ^ Anderson refers to Léon Feer, who already in 1870 "suggested the possibility that the four noble truths emerged into Buddhist literature through vinaya collections."[87] She also refers to Bareau, who noticed the consistency between the two versions in the Mahavagga, part of the Vinaya, and the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta of the Buddha's enlightenment: "As Bareau noted, the consistency between these two versions of the Buddha's enlightenment is an indication that the redactors of the Theravada canon probably brought the two accounts into agreement with each other at a relatively late point in the formation of the canon.
    Leon Feer had already suggested in 1870 that the versions of the four noble truths found in the sutras and suttas were derived from the vinaya rescensions in the larger body of Buddhist literature; Bareau's conclusion builds on this claim."[88]
  20. ^ Schmithausen, in his often-cited article On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism, notes that the mention of the four noble truths as constituting "liberating insight", which is attained after mastering the Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya 36.[90][22][91]
  21. ^ Anderson refers to reseacrh by K.R. Norman, Bareau, Skilling, Schmithausen and Bronkhorst.[93]
  22. ^ Well-known proponents of the first position are:
    * A.K. Warder. According to A.K. Warder, in his 1970 publication "Indian Buddhism", from the oldest extant texts a common kernel can be drawn out.[96] According to Warder, c.q. his publisher: "This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism of the period before the great schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of the Buddha himself, although this cannot be proved: at any rate it is a Buddhism presupposed by the schools as existing about a hundred years after the parinirvana of the Buddha, and there is no evidence to suggest that it was formulated by anyone else than the Buddha and his immediate followers."[96]
    * Richard Gombrich: "I have the greatest difficulty in accepting that the main edifice is not the work of a single genius. By "the main edifice" I mean the collections of the main body of sermons, the four Nikāyas, and of the main body of monastic rules."[94]
  23. ^ A proponent of the second position is Ronald Davidson: "While most scholars agree that there was a rough body of sacred literature (disputed)(sic) that a relatively early community (disputed)(sic) maintained and transmitted, we have little confidence that much, if any, of surviving Buddhist scripture is actually the word of the historic Buddha."[97]
  24. ^ Well-known proponent of the third position are:
    * J.W. de Jong: "It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism [...] the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas."[98]
    * Johannes Bronkhorst: "This position is to be preferred to (ii) for purely methodological reasons: only those who seek may find, even if no success is guaranteed."[99]
    * Donald Lopez: "The original teachings of the historical Buddha are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recover or reconstruct."[100]
  25. ^ See:
    • La Vallee Possin (1937), Musila et Narada; reprinted in Gombrich (2006), How Buddhism Began, appendix
    • Erich Frauwallner (1953), Geschichte der indischen Philosophie, Band Der Buddha und der Jina (pp. 147-272)
    • Andre Bareau (1963), Recherches sur la biographiedu Buddha dans les Sutrapitaka et les Vinayapitaka anciens, Ecole Francaise d'Extreme-Orient
    • Schmithausen, On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism. In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden 1981, 199-250.
    • Griffiths, Paul (1981), "Concentration or Insight; The Problematic of Theravada Buddhist Meditation-theory", The Journal of the American Academy of Religion
    • K.R. Norman, Four Noble Truths
    • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993) [1986], The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, chapter 8
    • Tilman Vetter (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, by Tilmann Vetter
    • Richard F. Gombrich (2006) [1996]. How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-19639-5., chapter four
    • Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
    • Alexander Wynne (2007), The Origin of Buddhist Meditation, Routledge
  26. ^ Tillmann Vetter: "Very likely the cause was the growing influence of a non-Buddhist spiritual environment·which claimed that one can be released only by some truth or higher knowledge. In addition the alternative (and perhaps sometimes competing) method of discriminating insight (fully established after the introduction of the four noble truths) seemed to conform so well to this claim."[108]

    According to Bronkhorst, this happened under influence of the "mainstream of meditation," that is, Vedic-Brahmanical oriented groups, which believed that the cessation of action could not be liberating, since action can never be fully stopped. Their solution was to postulate a fundamental difference between the inner soul or self and the body. The inner self is unchangeable, and unaffected by actions. By insight into this difference, one was liberated. To equal this emphasis on insight, Buddhists presented insight into their most essential teaching as equally liberating. What exactly was regarded as the central insight "varied along with what was considered most central to the teaching of the Buddha."[107]
  27. ^ "Enlightenment" is a typical western term, which bears its own, specific western connotations, meanings and interpretations.[111][112][113]
  28. ^ Majjhima Nikaya 26
  29. ^ Anguttara Nikaya II.45 (PTS)
  30. ^ Samyutta Nikaya III.140-142 (PTS)
  31. ^ Whereas Gogerly wrote in 1861 "That sorrow is connected with existence in all its forms [and] [t]hat its continuance results from a continued desire of existence," Spencer Hardy wrote in 1866 that "there is sorrow connected with every mode of existence; that the cause of sorrow is desire."[33] Childers, drawing on Gogerly and Hardy, writes that "existence is suffering; human passion (tanhã - desire) is the cause of continued existence."[124]
  32. ^ See David Chapman, Protestant Buddhism, A new World Religion and Problems with scripture.
  33. ^ Gimello (2004), as quoted in Taylor (2007).[127]
  34. ^ Majjhima Nikaya 26, "The Noble Search," also gives an account, which is markedly different, omitting the ascetic practices and the four truths.
  35. ^ Which keep one trapped in samsara.
  36. ^ Translation Bhikkhu Bodhi (2000), Samyutta Nikaya, SN 56.11, p.1846. See also Anderson (2001), Pain and its Ending, p.69.
  37. ^ MN 26.17 merely says "[']This will serve for the striving of a clansman intent on striving.' And I sat down there thinking: 'This will serve for striving.'[136] Bhikkhu Bodhi notes that Majjhima Nikaya 36 then continuous with the extreme ascetic practices, which are omitted in MN 26.[137] In verse 18, the Buddha has attained Nirvana, being secured from bondage by birth, ageing, sickness and death, referring to the truths of dependent origination and "the stilling of all formations, the relinquishing of all attachments, the destruction of craving, dispassion, cessation."[138]
  38. ^ According to Rahula, in What the Buddha Taught,

    ... if Nirvāṇa is to be expressed and explained in positive terms, we are likely immediately to grasp an idea associated with those terms, which may be quite the contrary. Therefore it is generally expressed in negative terms."[web 22][subnote 1]

    Rahula gives an overview of negative statements of nirvana, whereafter he states:

    Because Nirvana is thus expressed in negative terms, there are many who have got a wrong notion that it is negative, and expresses self-annihilation. Nirvāṇa is definitely no annihilation of self, because there is no self no annihilate. If at all, it is the annihilation of the illusion, of the false idea of self.

    It is incorrect to say that Nirvāṇa is negative or positive. The ideas of ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ are relative, and are within the realm of duality. These terms cannot be applied to Nirvāṇa, Absolute Truth, which is beyond duality and relativity [...]

    Nirvāṇa is neither cause nor effect. It is beyond cause and effect. Truth is not a result nor an effect. It is not produced like a mystic, spiritual, mental state, such as dhyāna or samādhi. TRUTH IS. NIRVĀṆA IS.[web 22]

    Rahula refers to the Dhātuvibhaṅga-sutta (the Majjhima-nikāya 140) for his interpretation of "Nirvāṇa as Absolute Truth," which, according to Rahula, says:

    O bhikkhu, that which is unreality (mosadhamma) is false; that which is reality (amosadhamma), Nibbāna, is Truth (Sacca). Therefore, O bhikkhu, a person so endowed is endowed with this Absolute Truth. For, the Absolute Noble Truth (paramaṃ ariyasaccaṃ) is Nibbāna, which is Reality.’[web 22]

    While Jayatilleke translates amosadhamma as "ineffable,"[155] Thanissaro Bhikkhu gives a somewhat different translation:

    His release, being founded on truth, does not fluctuate, for whatever is deceptive is false; Unbinding — the undeceptive — is true. Thus a monk so endowed is endowed with the highest determination for truth, for this — Unbinding, the undeceptive — is the highest noble truth.[web 23]

    In response to Rahula, Richard Gombrich states that Rahula's book would more aptly be titled What Buddhagosa Taught, and further states that:

    In proclaiming (in block capitals) that 'Truth is', Rahula has for a moment fallen into Upanisadic mode. Since truth can only be a property of propositions, which have subjects and predicates, and nirvana is not a proposition, it makes no sense in English to say that nirvana is truth. The confusion arises, perhaps, because the Sanskrit word satyam and the corresponding Pali word saccam can indeed mean either 'truth' or 'reality'. But in our language this will not work.[156]

Subnotes
  1. ^ Gombrich notes that this distinction between apophatic and cataphatic aproaches can be found in all religions.[154]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Williams 2002, p. 41.
  2. ^ Warder 1999, p. 67.
  3. ^ a b c d Anderson 2001, p. 85.
  4. ^ a b c Anderson 2001, p. 86.
  5. ^ a b Khantipalo 2003, p. 41.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Nyanatiloka 1980, p. 65.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Emmanuel 2015, p. 30.
  8. ^ a b c d e Williams 2002, p. 74-75.
  9. ^ Buswell & Lopez 2003, p. 708.
  10. ^ a b Schmidt-Leukel 2006, p. 32-34.
  11. ^ Makransky 1997, p. 27.
  12. ^ Rhys Davids & William Stede
  13. ^ a b c Warder 2000, p. 45-46.
  14. ^ a b Norman 2003.
  15. ^ a b c Makransky 1997, p. 27-28.
  16. ^ a b c Lopez 2009, p. 147.
  17. ^ Paul Williams, Anthony Tribe & Alexander Wynne 2012, pp. 32–34.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Spiro 1982, p. 42.
  19. ^ Buswell & Lopez 2003, p. 304.
  20. ^ Raju 1985, p. 147–151.
  21. ^ Eliot 2014, p. 39–41.
  22. ^ a b c d e Bronkhorst 1993. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  23. ^ a b c d e f g Anderson 1999. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  24. ^ a b c Bronkhorst 1993, p. 99-100, 102-111. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  25. ^ Anderson 1999, pp. 223–231. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  26. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 56. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  27. ^ a b c Bronkhorst 1993, p. 107. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  28. ^ a b c Anderson 1999, p. 55-56. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  29. ^ a b c d Anderson 1999, p. 230-231. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  30. ^ a b c d Carter 1987, p. 3179.
  31. ^ a b Carter 1987, p. 3179-3180.
  32. ^ a b Makransky 1997, p. 346-347.
  33. ^ a b c Harris 2006, p. 72-73.
  34. ^ a b c Anderson 2001, p. 196.
  35. ^ Anderson 2003, p. 295.
  36. ^ Norman 2003, p. 213.
  37. ^ Norman 2003, p. 219.
  38. ^ a b c d Norman 2003, p. 220.
  39. ^ Norman 2003, p. 219, 222.
  40. ^ a b Khantipalo 2003, p. 46.
  41. ^ a b Brazier 2001.
  42. ^ Cousins 2001, p. 36.
  43. ^ Choong 2000, p. 84.
  44. ^ Ajahn Sucitto 2010, Kindle Location 122.
  45. ^ a b Mingyur Rinpoche 2007, p. 70.
  46. ^ Williams 2002, p. 52.
  47. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, p. 349-350.
  48. ^ a b c Gethin 1998, p. 60.
  49. ^ Harvey 2013, p. 52.
  50. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 131.
  51. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 86-87.
  52. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 132.
  53. ^ Anderson 2011, p. 91.
  54. ^ a b c Harvey 2016.
  55. ^ a b c Samuel 2008, p. 136.
  56. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxi, xxxi-xxxii. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  57. ^ Idema 2004, p. 17.
  58. ^ Kingsland 2016, p. 286.
  59. ^ Anderson 2013.
  60. ^ Anderson 2013, p. 162 with note 38, for context see pages 1-3.
  61. ^ Huxter 2016, p. 10.
  62. ^ Harvey 2015, p. 26–31.
  63. [[#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEAnderson20131,_22_with_note_4_*_Harvey_(2015)'"`UNIQ--ref-000000A6-QINU`"'_91-0|^]] Anderson 2013, p. 1, 22 with note 4 * Harvey (2015)[62].
  64. ^ a b Walpola Rahula 2007, loc. 791-809.
  65. ^ Egge 2013, p. 124, note 37.
  66. ^ Schmithausen 1986, p. 205.
  67. ^ Gethin 1998, p. 70.
  68. ^ Ajahn Sucitto 2010, Kindle loc. 943-946.
  69. ^ Rahula 2007.
  70. ^ Walpola Rahula 2007, loc. 904-923.
  71. ^ Gethin 1998, p. 75.
  72. ^ a b Goldstein 2002, p. 158.
  73. ^ a b c d Bucknell 1984.
  74. ^ Batchelor 2012, p. 94.
  75. ^ Bhikkhu Bodhi 2016, p. 10.
  76. ^ Kingsland 2016, p. 280.
  77. ^ Harvey 2013, p. 71-72.
  78. ^ Keown 2000, Kindle Locations 909-911.
  79. ^ Lopez 2001, p. 52.
  80. ^ Williams 2002, p. 42.
  81. ^ Gethin 1998, pp. 63–64.
  82. ^ a b Anderson 1999, p. 55. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  83. ^ Anderson 1999, p. ix. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  84. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 21. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  85. ^ Batchelor 2012, p. 91.
  86. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 74, 77. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  87. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 183.
  88. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 74. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  89. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 148. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  90. ^ a b Schmithausen 1981.
  91. ^ a b Vetter 1988. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  92. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 17. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  93. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 19-20. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  94. ^ a b Gombrich 1997.
  95. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. vii. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  96. ^ a b Warder 1999, inside flap.
  97. ^ Davidson 2003, p. 147.
  98. ^ Jong 1993, p. 25.
  99. ^ Bronkhorst 1997, p. vii.
  100. ^ Lopez 1995, p. 4.
  101. ^ Vetter 1988, p. ix. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  102. ^ Hirakawa 1990, p. 28.
  103. ^ a b Vetter 1988, p. xxi-xxxvii. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  104. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1993, p. 93-111. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  105. ^ Gombrich 1997, p. 99-102.
  106. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxxii, xxxiii. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  107. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1993, p. 54-55, 96, 99. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  108. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxxiii. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVetter1988 (help)
  109. ^ a b c d e Bronkhorst 1993, p. 110. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  110. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. chpter 7. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  111. ^ Cohen 2006.
  112. ^ Sharf 1995.
  113. ^ Sharf 2000.
  114. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli (translator) 1995, p. 268.
  115. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 108. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  116. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 100-101. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  117. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 101. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  118. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1993, p. 102-103. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  119. ^ a b Crosby 2013.
  120. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 197. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  121. ^ a b Anderson 2001, p. 197.
  122. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 196-197.
  123. ^ a b c Harris 2006, p. 169.
  124. ^ a b Harris 2006, p. 120.
  125. ^ Gombrich & Obeyesekere 1988.
  126. ^ McMahan 2008.
  127. ^ Taylor 2007, p. 361.
  128. ^ a b Anderson 2001, p. 198.
  129. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 86. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  130. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 86-87. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  131. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli (translator) 1995.
  132. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 103-104. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  133. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 68. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAnderson1999 (help)
  134. ^ Anderson 2001, p. 69.
  135. ^ Bhikkhu Bodhi 2000, p. 1846.
  136. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 259.
  137. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 1216, note 403.
  138. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 259-260.
  139. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 106. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFBronkhorst1993 (help)
  140. ^ Walpola Rahula 2007, Kindle loc. 3935-3939.
  141. ^ Ajahn Succito 2010, pp. 99-100.
  142. ^ Ajahn Sumedho 2002, p. 9.
  143. ^ Phillip Moffitt 2002, Kindle loc. 225-226.
  144. ^ a b Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, Kindle Locations 303-306.
  145. ^ Thich Nhat Hahn 1999, pp. 28–46.
  146. ^ Bhikkhu Nanamoli (translator) 1995, p. 1137.
  147. ^ Rockhill 1884, pp. 187–188.
  148. ^ Potter 2004, p. 106.
  149. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, Kindle Locations 275-280.
  150. ^ Ajahn Sumedho 2002, p. 5.
  151. ^ Bikkhu Bodhi 2010, p. 10.
  152. ^ Hick 1994, p. 436.
  153. ^ a b Geisler & Amano 2004, p. 32.
  154. ^ Gombrich 2009, p. 150-152.
  155. ^ a b Jayatilleke 2009, p. 306.
  156. ^ Gombrich 2009, p. 156-157.
  157. ^ Spiro 1982, p. 76-77.
  158. ^ a b c Spiro 1982, p. 78.
  159. ^ Karunyakara 2002, p. 67.
  160. ^ Karunyakara 2002, p. 67-68.
  161. ^ Williams, Paul. Mahayana Buddhism. 1989. p. 103
  162. ^ Makransky 1997, p. 345.
  163. ^ a b c Makransky 1997, p. 346.
  164. ^ a b c Tsenshap Serkong Rinpochee 1996, p. 17.
  165. ^ Tsenshap Serkong Rinpochee 1996, p. 17, 66-67.
  166. ^ Tsenshap Serkong Rinpochee 1996, p. 66-67.
  167. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, Kindle Locations 2187-2190.
  168. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, Kindle Locations 741-743.
  169. ^ Geshe Tashi Tsering 2005, Kindle Locations 241.
  170. ^ Ringu Tulku 2005, pp. 36–54.
  171. ^ Lama Surya Das 1997.

Sources

Printed sources

  • Ajahn Sumedho (2002), The Four Noble Truths, Amaravati Publications
  • Ajahn Sucitto (2010), Turning the Wheel of Truth: Commentary on the Buddha's First Teaching, Shambhala
  • Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
  • Anderson, Carol (2001), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Motilall Banarsidas
  • Anderson, Carol (2003), "Four Noble Truths", in Buswell, Robert E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan Reference Books, ISBN 978-0-02-865718-9
  • Anderson, Carol (2013), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
  • Barber, Anthony W. (2008), Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley
  • Batchelor, Stephen (2012), "A Secular Buddhism", Journal of Global Buddhism, 13: 87–107
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (translator) (2000), The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya, Boston: Wisdom Publications, ISBN 0-86171-331-1 {{citation}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (2011), The Noble Eightfold Path: Way to the End of Suffering (Kindle ed.), Independent Publishers Group
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (2016), "The Transformations of Mindfulness", in Purser, Ronald E.; Forbes, David; Burke, Adam (eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness: Culture, Context, and Social Engagement, Springer
  • Bhikkhu Nanamoli (translator) (1995), The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya, Boston: Wisdom Publications, ISBN 0-86171-072-X {{citation}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  • Bhikkhu Thanissaro (translator) (1997), Tittha Sutta: Sectarians (AN 3.61), retrieved 12 November 2007 {{citation}}: |last= has generic name (help) (See also Anguttara Nikaya)
  • Brazier, David (2001), The Feeling Buddha, Robinson Publishing
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
  • Bucknell, Rod (1984), "The Buddhist to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages", The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7 (2)
  • Buswell, Robert E. JR; Gimello, Robert M. (editors) (1994), Paths to Liberation. The Marga and its Transformations in Buddhist Thought, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers {{citation}}: |first2= has generic name (help)
  • Buswell, Robert E. Jr.; Lopez, Donald Jr. (2003), The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton University Press
  • Carter, John Ross (1987), "Four Noble Truths", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, MacMillan
  • Chogyam Trungpa (2009), Leif, Judy (ed.), The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation, Shambhala
  • Choong, Mun-keat (2000), The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism: A Comparative Study Based on the Sutranga Portion of the Pali Samyutta-Nikaya and the Chinese Samyuktagama, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag
  • Cohen, Robert S. (2006), Beyond Enlightenment: Buddhism, Religion, Modernity, Routledge
  • Cousins, L.S. (2001), "Review of "Pain and its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon" (PDF), Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 8: 36–41
  • Crosby, Kate (2013), Theravada Buddhism: Continuity, Diversity, and Identity, John Wiley & Sons
  • Dalai Lama (1992), The Meaning of Life: Buddhist Perspectives on Cause and Effect, Translated and edited by Jeffrey Hopkins, Wisdom
  • Dalai Lama (1998), The Four Noble Truths, Thorsons
  • Davidson, Ronald M. (2003), Indian Esoteric Buddhism, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-12618-2
  • Dhamma, Ven. Dr. Rewata (1997), The First Discourse of the Buddha, Wisdom, ISBN 0-86171-104-1
  • Duff, Tony (2008), Contemplation by way of the Twelve Interdependent Arisings, Padma Karpo Translation Committee, archived from the original on 23 January 2008, retrieved 19 August 2008
  • Egge, James (2013), Religious Giving and the Invention of Karma in Theravada Buddhism, Routledge
  • Eliot, Charles (2014), Japanese Buddhism, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-317-79274-1
  • Emmanuel, Steven M. (2015), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons
  • Epstein, Mark (2004), Thoughts Without A Thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist Perspective (Kindle ed.), Basic Books
  • Feer, Leon (editor) (1976), The Samyutta Nikaya, vol. 5, London: Pali Text Society {{citation}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  • Fronsdal, Gil (2001), The Issue at Hand (Kindle ed.), self-published
  • Geisler, Norman; Amano, J. Yutaka (2004), The Reincarnation Sensation, Wipf and Stock Publishers
  • Geshe Tashi Tsering (2005), The Four Noble Truths: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume I (Kindle ed.), Wisdom
  • Geshe Tashi Tsering (2006), Buddhist Psychology: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume III (Kindle ed.), Perseus Books Group
  • Gethin, Rupert (1998), Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press
  • Goenka, S.N. (2000), The Discourse Summaries, Pariyatti
  • Goldstein, Joseph (2002), One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism, HarperCollins
  • Goldstein, Joseph (2013), Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to Awakening (Kindle ed.), Sounds True
  • Gombrich, Richard; Obeyesekere, Ganan (1988), Buddhism Transformed: Religious Change in Sri Lanka, Motilall Banarsidass
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1997). How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-19639-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Gombrich, Richard (2009), What the Buddha Thought, Equinox
  • Harris, Elizabeth (2006), Theravada Buddhism and the British Encounter: Religious, Missionary and Colonial Experience in Nineteenth Century Sri Lanka, Routledge
  • Harvey, Graham (2016), Religions in Focus: New Approaches to Tradition and Contemporary Practices, Routledge
  • Harvey, Peter (2013), An Introduction to Buddhism, Cambridge University Press
  • Harvey, Peter (2015), Emmanuel, Steven M. (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3
  • Hick, John (1994), Death and Eternal Life, Westminster John Knox Press
  • Hirakawa, Akira (1990), A History of Indian Buddhism. From Sakyamuni to Early Mahayana, University of Hawai'i Press
  • Huxter, Malcolm (2016), Healing the Heart and Mind with Mindfulness: Ancient Path, Present Moment, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-317-50540-2
  • Jayatilleke, K.N. (2009), Facets of Buddhist Thought: Collected Essays, Buddhist Publication Society
  • Kalupahana, David J. (1992), A history of Buddhist philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • Karunyakara, Lella (2002), Modernisation of Buddhism: Contributions of Ambedkar and Dalai Lama XIV, Gyan Books
  • Keown, Damien (2000), Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction (Kindle ed.), Oxford University Press
  • Khantipalo, Bhikkhu Phra (2003), Calm and Insight: A Buddhist Manual for Meditators, Routledge
  • Khunu Rinpoche (2012), Vast as the Heavens, Deep as the Sea: Verses in Praise of Bodhicitta, Translated by Thubten Thardo (Gareth Sparham) (Kindle ed.), Wisdom
  • Kingsland, James (2016), Siddhartha's Brain: Unlocking the Ancient Science of Enlightenment, HarperCollins
  • Lama Surya Das (1997), Awakening the Buddha Within (Kindle ed.), Broadway Books
  • Leifer, Ron (1997), The Happiness Project, Snow Lion
  • Lopez, Donald S (1995), Buddhism in Practice (PDF), Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-04442-2
  • Lopez, Donald S. (2001), The Story of Buddhism, HarperCollins
  • Lopez, Donald, jr. (2009), Buddhism and Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, University of Chicago Press{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Makransky, John J. (1997), Buddhahood Embodied: Sources of Controversy in India and Tibet, SUNY
  • McDermott, James Paul (1975), "The Kathāvatthu Kamma Debates", Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 95, no. 3
  • McMahan, David L. (2008), The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195183276
  • Mingyur Rinpoche (2007), The Joy of Living: Unlocking the Secret and Science of Happiness (Kindle ed.), Harmony
  • Moffitt, Philip (2008), Dancing with Life: Buddhist Insights for Finding Meaning and Joy in the Face of Suffering (Kindle ed.), Rodale
  • Monier-Williams (1899, 1964), A Sanskrit-English Dictionary (PDF), London: Oxford University Press, retrieved 27 December 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  • Norman, K.R. (2003), "The Four Noble Truths", K.R. Norman Collected Papers II (PDF)
  • Nyanatiloka (1980), Buddhist Dictionary, Buddhist Publication Society
  • Pema Chodron (2010), Comfortable with Uncertainty: 108 Teachings on Cultivating Fearlessness and Compassion, Shambhala
  • Potter, Karl (2004), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Vol. IX: Buddhist philosophy from 350 to 600 AD
  • Rahula, Walpola (2007), What the Buddha Taught, Grove Press
  • Raju, P. T. (1985), Structural Depths of Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-88706-139-4
  • Ringu Tulku (2005), Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism, Snow Lion
  • Rockhill, William Woodville, transl. (1884), The life of the Buddha and the early history of his order, derived from Tibetan works in the Bkah-Hgyur and Bstan-Hgyur, followed by notices on the early history of Tibet and Khoten, London: Trübner{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Samuel, Geoffrey (2008), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra: Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press
  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (2006), Understanding Buddhism, Dunedin Academic Press, ISBN 978-1-903765-18-0
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1981), On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism". In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1986), "Critical response", in Neufeldt, Ronald W. (ed.), Karma and rebirth: Post-Classical Developments, State University of New York
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1995), "Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience" (PDF), NUMEN, 42
  • Sharf, Robert H. (2000), "The Rhetoric of Experience and the Study of Religion" (PDF), Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7 (11–12): 267–87
  • Smith, Huston; Novak, Philip (2009), Buddhism: A Concise Introduction (Kindle ed.), HarperOne
  • Snelling, John (1987), The Buddhist handbook. A Complete Guide to Buddhist Teaching and Practice, London: Century Paperbacks
  • Spiro, Melford E. (1982), Buddhism and Society: A Great Tradition and Its Burmese Vicissitudes, University of California Press
  • Taylor, Philip (2007), Modernity and Re-enchantment: Religion in Post-revolutionary Vietnam, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  • Thich Nhat Hanh (1991), Old Path White Clouds, Parallax Press
  • Thich Nhat Hanh (1999), The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching, Three River Press
  • Traleg Kyabgon (2001), The Essence of Buddhism, Shambhala
  • Tsenshap Serkong Rinpoche (1996), Een Lamp voor het Pad naar Verlichting, Uitgeverij Maitreya
  • Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL
  • Walpola Rahula (2007), What the Buddha Taught (Kindle ed.), Grove Press
  • Walsh, Maurice (1995), The Long Discourses of the Buddha. A Translation of the Dīgha Nikāya, Wisdom Publications
  • Warder, A.K. (1999), Indian Buddhism, Delhi{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Watson, Burton (1993), The Lotus Sutra, Columbia University Press
  • Williams, Paul (2002), Buddhist Thought (Kindle ed.), Taylor & Francis
  • Williams, Paul (2008), Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Routledge
  • Paul Williams; Anthony Tribe; Alexander Wynne (2012), Buddhist Thought, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-136-52088-4

Web-sources

  1. ^ a b Encyclopædia Britannica, Arhat (Buddhism)
  2. ^ a b c d e Ajahn Sumedho, The First Noble Truth (nb: links to index-page; click "The First Noble Truth" for correct page.
  3. ^ accestoinsight.org, What is Theravada Buddhism?
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Donald Lopez, Four Noble Truths, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  5. ^ Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta: Setting the Wheel of Dhamma in Motion - Majjhima Nikaya 56.11
  6. ^ Bikkhu Bodhi (translator), Dhammacakkapavattana Sutta. Samyutta Nikaya LVI, 11. "Setting in Motion the Wheel of the Dhamma."
  7. ^ Digital Library & Museum of Buddhist Studies, College of liberal Arts, Taiwan University: Samudaya
  8. ^ Sanskrit Dictionary for spoken Sanskrit, samudaya
  9. ^ spokensanskrit.de, nirodha
  10. ^ Access to Insight Glossary - m
  11. ^ Pali Text Society Dictionary
  12. ^ Access to Insight Glossary - pq
  13. ^ The Dharmafarers, Rhitassa Sutra (Samyutta Nikaya 2.26)
  14. ^ Thanissaro Bhikkhu, The Truth of Rebirth And Why it Matters for Buddhist Practice
  15. ^ Maha-parinibbana Sutta: Last Days of the Buddha, translated by Sister Vajira & Francis Story
  16. ^ a b Maha-parinibbana Sutta: Last Days of the Buddha, translated by Sister Vajira & Francis Story
  17. ^ a b c Patrick Olivelle (2012), Encyclopædia Britannica, Moksha (Indian religions)
  18. ^ The Four Noble Truths - By Bhikkhu Bodhi
  19. ^ a b Fake Buddha Quotes, "There is no path to happiness. Happiness is the path."
  20. ^ Maha-parinibbana Sutta: Last Days of the Buddha, translated by Sister Vajira & Francis Story
  21. ^ Expounding the Law, The Walters Art Museum
  22. ^ a b c d e f Walpola Rahula, What the Buddha Taught, chapter four: Nirodha
  23. ^ Dhatu-vibhanga Sutta: An Analysis of the Properties
  24. ^ Walpola Rahula, What the Buddha Taught. Chapter 2. Dukkha
  25. ^ http://www.nichiren-shu.org.uk/septoctnewsletter.html
  26. ^ Quote from Watson (1993), The Lotus Sutra
  27. ^ Four Noble truths for Voice Hearers, see "Background" section

Further reading

Historical background and development

  • Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, chapter 8
  • Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge

Theravada commentaries

Tibetan Buddhism

  • Chögyam Trungpa (2009), The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation, Shambhala.
  • Dalai Lama (1998), The Four Noble Truths, Thorsons.
  • Geshe Tashi Tsering (2005), The Four Noble Truths: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume I, Wisdom, Kindle Edition
  • Ringu Tulku (2005), Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism, Snow Lion. (Part 1 of 3 is a commentary on the four truths)

Modern interpretations

  • Epstein, Mark (2004), Thoughts Without A Thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist Perspective. Basic Books. Kindle Edition. (Part 1 examines the four truths from a Western psychological perspective)
  • Moffitt, Phillip (2008), Dancing with Life: Buddhist Insights for Finding Meaning and Joy in the Face of Suffering, Rodale, Kindle Edition. (An explanation of how to apply the Four Noble Truths to daily life)
  • Thich Nhat Hanh (1999), The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching, Three Rivers Press

Other commentaries

  • Gethin, Rupert (1998), Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press, (Chapter 3 is a commentary of about 25 pages.)
  • Lopez, Donald S. (2001), The Story of Buddhism, HarperCollins. (pp. 42–54)
  • Walpola Rahula (1974), What the Buddha Taught, Grove Press