User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Archive 2

Delivered message from my userpage:

If you'll permit me to edit your page (I dunno what the rules are there, but delete this anytime), what is good speculation and what is bad, and who decides? If I speculate that Cartman is French, for example, why shouldn't my speculation go in the article? Where does it stop? It would be chaos. It's basically original research. That's why we have to base things on reliable sources, not on our own opinions. Hopefully a newspaper or DVD commentary will note as you have that Kevin and Esther may be twins, then it can go in wikipedia. 86.44.6.14 (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

It is the encylopedia that matters. And I think over time people have noticed that the encylopedia works best when people focus on the content submitted, not on the editor submitting it. :) You're completely right about how people shouldn't remove personal attacks from your talk page, btw (and wikipedia policy agrees: wp:rpa), even if they're probably just trying to be nice. 86.44.6.14 (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

re: Happy Valentine's Day!

Thanks, hope you have a great day too! --Farosdaughter (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Wilhelmina Will. You have new messages at Jazzeur's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks! Have a great day yourself! - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! The Chronic 06:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Yup, thanks! ;) --LAX 09:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Lol, thanks, same to you. :)  Paul  730 14:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

This is a little late, but I'd just like to add my thanks for the cute Valentine too. :) Keep smiling! - Sestet (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

It did lighten up my day! I hope you're having a good one too! seresin | wasn't he just...? 03:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Valentines

Thanks for the pic, Will! I appreciate your thoughtful gesture. Bluecatcinema (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, surprisingly, it did make my day! :D - Mtmelendez ^(Talk) 15:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

also for the image. Happy day to you too. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

What all the others said. Thanks a lot! 96T (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

My second attack, received (Lucky me!!!)=

YOU AINT GNA GET NO PuSSY IF YOU@RE ON FUCKIN WIKIPEDIA ALL DAY GAYLORD - IM GOING TO OXFORD NOW YEAHHHHHHHHHHH IM THE BEST (The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:81.109.22.41 (Talk) at 23:49, 14 February, 2008.)

...

Here's a Valentine's Day Kiss on the cheek for you, Madam

Thanks! I always wanted a Wiki-Valentine ;u) Anyhow, I hope your <3's Day went swell, too. --Is this fact...? 06:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit at User talk:Negropoppa

Was this directed at me or at User:Negropoppa? Just wondering, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, then that settles that. Thanks for the clarification. One thing I'll add though, as a perfectly non-prejudicial, non-"anti-religious" editor, is be careful not to let your mind open to far. Open mindedness is a good thing, and far less stressful than closemindedness. However, if you let your mind open too far, it is possible that your brain could fall out. Cheers! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

WIGGIN/TATE

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Judy Tate is an American television writer and playwright. She has written for ATWT (Breakdown Writer: 2000-March 26, 2007; Script Writer: March 27, 2007 - October 15, 2007) and Days of Our Lives (Breakdown Writer: November 12, 2007 - January 2008). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Maria Arena Bell

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Rothenberg

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

D.M. Stanley

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

ADER

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

== Why would a discussion allow unofficial material? ==

This is not my decision to have this in the intro either. If you look at the discussion page the consensus was to leave it as is.
I also don't see what you mean by 'official', is the ft not a good enough reference?FFMG (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Randy Robbins/Frank Pacelli

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

5 Writers

Please help us out. Thanks.

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Patti Dizanzo is an American television writer who worked on Guiding Light (1978-1984) and As The World Turns (1984-1996).

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Meredith Post is an American television writer who wrote for ATWT (1983-1997) and DOOL (1997-2001). She received 6 Daytime Emmy nominations and a single WGA Award nod.

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Shelly Moore

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

CORLEY

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Parker/Burdette

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

BRAXTON/PINSKER

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

KUNTZ

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Klein

Kathleen Klein is an American television writer who has worked on All My Children (1986-1993, 1995-2001), Another World (1993-1994), and Guiding Light (1994-1995). She has been nominated for 10 Daytime Emmys and 5 WGA Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

JACK WOOD

This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Wells

This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Kirshenbaum

Susan Kirshenbaum is an American television writer who worked on All My Children (1983-1994) and As The World Turns (1995-2000). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Adolph

No, my name is not Adolph. Thanks for asking, Gwernol 06:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

BcBot

Good heavens! How unusual, and what a pleasant surprise. Somebody posted something polite, pleasant and (wait for it) helpful & useful on a BcBot-related page!!
That deserves a Barnstar!!! What can I find? I know, I can do better than a Barnstar. Here's one of Phaedriel's flowers.

Thank you!

Pdfpdf (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey you!

google sez ur special so i luv u lulz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.156.3 (talk) 08:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Thx

just wanted to say thax for the nice sex 15 minutes ago ciao 69.136.156.3 (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ancestry boxes

Hello Wilhelmina Will! I see that you say you don't know how to put in the boxes for your Dutch, Danish, Prussian, Russian and Portuguese ancestry. Here they are, except for Prussian:

This user is of Dutch ancestry.

This user is of Danish ancestry.

This user is of
Russian ancestry.

This user is of Portuguese ancestry.

Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Found the Prussian one!

This user is of Prussian ancestry.

Bye! The Ogre (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

IP block

Hi WWill,

We don't do permanent blocks of anonymous IP accounts, because it is possible that they could be in use by more than one user. We can, however, give longer and longer blocks if the IP continues vandalizing -- I've seen them up to 6 months. Thanks for your help with this one! NawlinWiki (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Burdette

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nicole Burdette, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.newschool.edu/drama_cms/faculty.aspx?id=9392. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Challenge

Responding to your challenge. There are many pgs in the soap opera categories and WP:AFC that need to be created. They are mostly about notable writers/producers/directors/executives. Try: Ron Lagomarsino —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.43.206 (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

re: Well I like that!

I've replied on my talk page. --Captain Infinity (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete these images?

The images could be used in separate articles on the DVDs or if there was significant commentary on the DVDs in Dante's Cove but they were just decorative, failing WP:NFCC #8 -Nv8200p talk 04:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No commentary. Grouping into a list would not help. -Nv8200p talk 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VeronicaStar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VeronicaStar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy Saint Patrick's Day!

I hope yours is a blessing this year! --Is this fact...? 22:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:WhatYouSaid

Well, I always try to be kind. :u) Anyhow, Happy Good Friday/Easter, too, and good luck with that sock puppet case. --Is this fact...? 22:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BabyPoof.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BabyPoof.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:TimmyTurner.gif

Why are you defending an inferior image of Timmy Turner in the wrong format (GIF, vs. PNG)? According to Wikipedia's fair use policy, we cannot keep duplicate images if one of the images is unused. Also, images on Wikipedia should never be saved as GIF unless animated. On my version, I also removed the interlacing artifacts from the image. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 01:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 11	13 March 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage	Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule"
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration	WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling
Tutorial: Summary of policies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 12	17 March 2008	About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles"	News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at peer review
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones	Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: APK's talk page

Look, he can't be forced to listen to you. He has acknowledged your point, and continues to disagree with you. If you proceed in belaboring the point, you are going to be blocked for harassment and disruption. You are taking what was a small issue that did not concern you, and turning it into a bigger problem for yourself which may get you sanctioned. No one wants this, so please stop... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

For real... let it drop. All of it... Just forget it ever happened, make no further contact with APK, and make no further attempt to make comments ABOUT APK... This all goes away when you stop... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I try. In the future, please try to de-escalate problems rather than escalate them. Getting to the point were admins are involved is always a bad course of action. Sometimes, the best thing to do is to be the "bigger person" and just walk away. Lets consider the whole matter closed. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Attack page deleted

You may not maintain a subpage that is a list of Wiki-enemies, and I have deleted the page as such. Please read WP:ATP, especially the line that reads: a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad that some user ever did" is not constructive or appropriate. . Please stop this. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

And I've redeleted it as Users I don't see eye to eye with. Let the matter go. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wilhelmina Will for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Land Before Time Wiki

Hello! I am Aabicus on the Land Before Time Wiki. Thank you for all the work you've done cleaning up and improving the wiki! Would you like to be made an admin over there?--Ye Olde Luke (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

News from Grieferhate

I noticed that u seem 2 be a South Park fan. I'm looking 4 da episode in which Stan loses his virginity, because I wud rather be the "person dumb enough to look deserving to lose that much of their life." (Quoting Matt Stone's statement in the interview). I couldn't stand the idea of any other fan, especially u, looking dumb and deserving 2 lose as much of their life as Stan did. I don't think that it would be a very flattering mark, and I'm perfectly willing to save people that embarrassment and find them the episode. Do u think I'm doing da right thing or shud I let someone else find it? Thanks for the kindness you've shown me and your support in helping me with my slightly strong "campaign" to stop Kyle Broflovski's age being changed to 8, by da way! U have been a gud wikipedia friend! Grieferhate (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry About That

No doubt you will see that I apparently reverted you and then undid my revert. My apologies that happened. I was going through television articles, saw you, checked your contribs, whereupon I accidentally clicked the rollback. Sorry once again, just wanted to let you know there's no problem: just a stupid twitch of my thumb. :P Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 01:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Weird messages from User:72.200.177.49

Of which he/she replaced my entire page content here with these notes:

Colective. What Can You Lose? preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.177.49, at 01:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Colective. "What Can You Lose?" It's a message to treelo, elaich and dietlimecola.Bitch. preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.177.49, at 17:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Because you are obviouslly his girlfriend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.177.49 (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of User talk:Wilhelmina Will/Is Keira Knightley an Ichthyosaur?. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 17:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

More news from Grieferhate

Oh, hey. Hope ur well. Still looking for that mystery episode. Hoping I can look for it without losing my sanity. Progress is slow and arduous and I'm tiring, but still going strong. U cul? 86.162.29.210 (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Wow. You really are a sockpuppet. When someone accuses you of sockpuppetry, you went all out on them. Also, don't expect God to zap everyone that pisses you off. That doesn't make you religious. If your having such a hard time on Wikipedia, then get off and get a life. dumbass.72.200.177.49 (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Weird messages from User:Colective Fighter Jason

Whom I personally believe may be associated with that other strange user (who is an IP) from further up.

Colective owns this page preceding unsigned comment added by User:Colective Fighter Jason, at 22:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 14	31 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires	Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace"	News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones
Dispatches: Featured content overview	WikiProject Report: Australia
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cosmo and Wanda.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cosmo and Wanda.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:BabyPoof.jpg

Stop removing tags that still apply. --Geniac (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

"It'll get deleted if it's not a redirect." - Yes, that's the point. A better version is now available and so this version of the same image needs to be deleted. If you continue being disruptive in this way, or any other, you will be blocked. You should also know that comments like "Have mercy, damn it! Mercy!!!" and "For shame!" sound childish and are not constructive. You need to give actual, valid reasons for things and use appropriate edit summaries that reflect the edit being made. --Geniac (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Geniac (talk) 04:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|I have work to do elsewhere in Wikipedia, and I cannot get it done with this delay. Furthermore, I have not caused disruption. After your final message to me, Geniac, did I revert you again? No, I did not. I merely attempted to close the discussion by saying why I did what I did, as I do with every discussion. I do not like images being deleted when they could be redirected instead. I do not like anything being deleted when it could be redirected instead. In proposed deletions of articles, the first thing I ever suggest is merely redirecting them. If those with the proper authority choose not to follow this advice, that's their business, not mine. Now I am off, thinking that this whole issue is over, gathering references for an article I am trying to improve, and I come back and find this has happened. Undo this act, please. To add to what I have to say: I'm sorry if I upset you in all this, Geniac, I truly am. But you must understand that I am quick-tempered, and I often lash out before I can stop myself. You might be amazed at how much worse my reaction would have been in January. And it took this sort of house arrest to make me realise where I was going wrong. Even now I've not got a perfect savoir faire, but I'm trying to stay on the road to it. But I should have been calmer, and explained myself more clearly and gently, I know. Especially when you and I have discussed things with each other two or three times before, and actually seemed to get along pretty well. I just don't understand why you won't leave the JPG images as redirects to the PNG images, or why you seem to show no emotion towards them. I hate it when people seem stone cold towards something I am passionate about; especially when I've previously known them to be very nice people, and excellent Wikipedians.}}

Actually, you have not yet unblocked me, Geniac, or there was a malfunction somewhere. I still cannot edit pages. But thank you very much, anyway! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, I am back now. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Weird messages received from User:72.200.176.36

This one here has got to be, by far, the strangest of these messages yet. But I'll betcha ten to one that it's connected to that previous IP user and that account user before... Anyway, I have removed a lot of the spacing so as not to bloat out the talk page too much.

U r startin to piss me off. The Colectives wont stop vandalizing. We can vandalize anywhere and anytime. If you protect your page, we will wait until you un-protect it. You will half to. Fucker.

Colective own this page and this user

Colective.

Colective

Colective.preceding unsigned comment added by User:72.200.176.36, at 21:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TimmyTurner.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:TimmyTurner.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

that's a wierd question

Well comparing to my american friends I'd say it's the same really. Matthieu (talk) 13:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If you say that to a Frenchman he's going to think you love him, I doubt it is the purpose here is it? If you want to show how much you like the French language it's better to say "J'adore la langue française" or something like that so you can avoid ambiguities. Don't hesitate if you have other questions. Matthieu (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The very few (I can think of only one time) I used another wikipedia article as a source (to back something I knew and I had other sources on the topic, just wanted to diversify the sources) I didn't quote the other article but re-used the academic source is used, in this precise case it was Duffy's Mediaval Ireland (I was tired of using Gillingham, Hallam, Aurel and Carpenter as contant sources). In all case, it won't give a lot of weight to the point if you just quote another wiki article, use a recognised source rather (can't say wiki is one) Matthieu (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

alright, here you go, it's not a litteral translation but is largely acceptable: "Quel est la meilleure façon de faire? Citer une source via un article ou se contenter de la laisser comme un lien en bas de page?" Matthieu (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles as a source

Where did you read that other Wikipedia articles can be cited in an article? "[...] open wikis [...] are largely not acceptable." (WP:SPS) and Wikipedia is not a "third-party published source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (WP:SOURCES). You said, "in Chris Griffin's article, there was a statement, which another user removed, asking that they (who put it in) please cite the episode in which it occured". Yes, an episode can be cited, but not an episode's article. --Geniac (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, when an episode is cited, a link to that episode's article would be appropriate. The refs I removed from Randy and Sharon Marsh didn't make it obvious what was being cited; the article or the episode. Using {{cite web}} or {{cite episode}} would make it clearer. BTW, no; see WP:NFCC#1. --Geniac (talk) 04:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I must repaint my house

Correct translation would be: "Je dois repeindre ma maison". Cheers. Matthieu (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

HolywoodChicago.com

I see that you rejected the new article creation for HollywoodChicago.com. How does it not have reliable sources? It has a huge list of reliable sources.

Second attempt at article for HollywoodChicago.com

Per your guidance, I have created a new article. Is this new article better?

Probably the best place to further explain to the author (it took me a second to realize this was via the Articles for Creation process) why that article had problems... I went through those sources... none of them are about HollywoodChicago.com - they are stories about other things that link to stories about those things that happen to be published by HollywoodChicago.com - I am glad the site is seeing success in syndicating its content... but again, no one is talking about the site itself... only Batman and film screening. (And Wilhelmina Will, thanks for taking care of it.)--Marcinjeske (talk) 09:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

On my talk page it said the article is live, but I just checked and the new article for HollywoodChicago.com is all gone and only appears to redirect to the Chicago Film Critics Association. Why is it a redirect and why is the whole article gone? Are you looking for stories that instead write about the publication (like this and this?) --68.72.135.94 (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Wilhelmina Will said in edit summary: You were all for redirecting on the other user's talk page.

No, I was not all for redirecting on User_talk:68.72.135.94. I said there were three paths which could be taken, one of them being keeping the redirect that you created as a way to wait until things cool over. The one I preferred was restoring the article and leaving it Proposed for deletion so that the opinion of another editor would be solicited. However, given that it was obvious that the HC.com people objected to deletion and I presume you object to deletion, I had to follow my third option, which was to bring the article up for a discussion... in going through the prescribed process, the Wikipedia software informed me that this exact article had already been discussed a few month ago, and deleted with overwhelming consensus. the relevant discussions are:

• [[17]]
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Fendelman
• Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/AdamFendelman
• [18]

He has been wasting all of our time and the time of editors before us... by repeatedly submitting the same promotional content. I read the third party article cited, I listened to the whole darn radio interview... there is nothing there except to substantiate that HC.com exists. What he says in an interview are his own words... you cannot be a third-party source for yourself. I hope you understand I am not drawing this line because of some spite... but Wikipedia is so awash in self-promotion that every piece we can keep out is vital. --Marcinjeske (talk) 21:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I see that you have removed my speedy deletion and restored the redirect. If I interpret WP:CSD correctly, you are the creator of the page:

Any editor who is not the creator of a page may remove a speedy tag from it.
The creator may not do this. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion
should instead add hangon to the page, and explain the rationale on the page's discussion page.

Assuming your redirect was intended to disagrees with my speedy deletion request, I am restoring the page, placing the hangon on your behalf, and copying the substance of discussion from User_talk:68.72.135.94 on the HC.com discussion page. --Marcinjeske (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Inga Liepa and reliable sources

www.integracija.gov.lv You have declined creating article about Inga Liepa - the most senior civil servant in the Republic of Latvia. There is only sixteen (16) so high top officials in Latvia. She is secretary of State. Article was provided with the source - official government home page of ministry, with her official curriculum vitae (http://www.integracija.gov.lv/?id=308&top=46&sa=62&doc=1248). Can you, please, explain me - what can be more reputable source than government offical information on top official - Secretary of State? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.199.125.107 (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

HollywoodChicago.com

A tag has been placed on HollywoodChicago.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a user page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a regular Wikipedia article rather than a user page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Geniac (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Wilhelmina_Will, I am really disappointed that after three admins have deleted HollywoodChicago.com and at least two other editors (not to mention all the editors in the previous debates and all the editors who have to delete the link spam pointing to HC.com to the various film pages) have objected to the creation of the article, you insist on recreating it. I think it is a good thing that you help out new users create articles, but in this case you are not following the spirit or the letter of Wikipedia's guidelines. I do not understand your belief that an inappropriate article can somehow be ok if you redirect it somewhere else for a while. The people who run HC.com have been repeatedly to spam Wikipedia every few months, and you are only letting them use you to continue the blatant promotion of this commercial website. --Marcinjeske (talk) 10:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

None of my business and all of that, and I have no idea regarding the notability of the website, but.. regarding HC spamming us, that really shouldn't impact our creation or deletion of an article for them. Like WP:SELF says, when it comes to those things, we should approach the situation as if we were not Wikipedia. -- Ned Scott 10:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Please, do make it your business... because although I am pretty sure about my stance... I have done all I can in terms of editing the actual page... I should have been more clear... when I say spam... I mean trying to create that article... HollywoodChicago.com has been created and subsequently deleted every few months. (see the article's talk page for more details). So no, I am not suggesting that spam in other parts of Wikipedia is grounds for an article to be included... but repeatedly trying to create the same self-promotional article when nothing about it's notability has changed and no reliable third-party sources have appeared is spam.

There is the separate issue of links to HC.com being placed in other articles in a clearly self-promotional way... but that is not the issue I complained about above. Sorry to not have been clearer. --Marcinjeske (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ok, that does make more sense then. -- Ned Scott 10:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 15	7 April 2008	About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins	WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges"
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 16	14 April 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles	Image placeholders debated
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk"	News and notes: Board meeting, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Featured article milestone
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

He's back

Thought I'd let you know TTN is back, since you were seeking his help.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 17	21 April 2008	About the Signpost

BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD	Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested
Global login, blocking features developed	WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology"
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes	WikiProject Report: The Simpsons
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Message from 72.200.176.36

Note: Product ride time can be reduced any where from 10-20 minutes, on a fully charged battery, depending on riders weight; various riding conditions and/or if product has been properly maintained. Battery shows fully charged, but goes low after 10-15 minutes of use and/or unit run (very) slow. Try the following:

Check riders weight & riding conditions, do not exceed the weight limit, go up a steep hill or attempt to tow objects. It is best to avoid these conditions at all times. Check air pressure in front and rear tires, if pressure is low, inflate tires to recommended PSI (located on tire sidewall) Check chain tension. If chain is too tight, refer to pg 6 in owner's manual. Check front brake pads for signs that they are rubbing against the front tire (rim). If the brake pads are rubbing, readjust the brakes (Refer to pg 4 in Owner's Manual) Make sure charger is plugged into charger port correctly & indicator lights are working properly. If the charger is not plugged into the charger port correctly, then make sure to plug charger into charger port correctly and charger for 8 hours (refer to page 3 in the Owner's Manual.) Secure unit; turn power on & with NO weight on the unit, lift back end up & apply the throttle, if the rear wheel spins freely, then replace the battery.

Rear wheel barely moves. Try the following:

Lift rear end up and manually spin rear wheel forward. Should spin 3-4 times with no resistance. If the wheel does not spin freely, replace rear wheel.

Details +/− ProductsElectric

E300/300s
E200/200s
 Users who viewed this answer have also viewed

Battery won't take a charge Battery maintenance & storage Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - E100/125/150 Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - MX350/500/650 Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - Pocket Mod/Sport Mod Previously Viewed Answers Short ride time, runs slow, NOT holding a charge - E100/125/150 Print Answer Email Answer

Close Window About Razor® the Colective is back USA | Razor® Products | Replacement Parts | Service & Repair | Help & Support | Contact | RipStik® Caster Board Copyright © 2003-2007 Razor USA LLC. All rights reserved. Razor®, RipStik®, Scream Machine®, Ground Force®, the A Logo Design and the Razor Logo Design are registered trademarks of Razor USA LLC and/or its affiliated companies in the United States and/or select foreign countries. Pocket Mod™, Sport Mod™, Dirt Rocket™, Rebellion™, Punk Rail™, Kiddie Kick™, Cruiser™, Bumper Buggie™, Pocket Rocket™, and Scuttle Bug™ are trademarks of Razor USA LLC.

Privacy

You're welcome, WW!

I'm honestly flattered by all your thanks :u) I appreciate you gratitude. I felt it was only right, seeing the obvious holes in the case against you. Congrats on making it out, alive! --Is this fact...? 22:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

By the Way

I'm not going to be editing any Wikipedia articles from now on -- I'm cutting the addiction. I'm still going to check my talk page messages, though, so feel free to keep writing me if you land in another pickle. I'll be glad to help :u)

Is this fact...? has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend and remember :"All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them." Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Is this fact...? has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Is this fact...? 09:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: A Pistol for Ringo

Please read the entire decline reason. It clearly says the article was declined out of a concern for the internal footnotes having absolutely no relevance to the items they cite. Redfarmer (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for the cookies! Funny what can happen to your user pages when you're not even around ... That particular vandal has been making sockpuppets to add goofy stuff to the Liberace article. I don't quite get his point, but then there may not be one. Happy editing!  :) Antandrus (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Block for 48 hours

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. You appear to have vandalized France. If this has been done in error, please contact me, or another admin at WP:AN. Bearian (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Lol, this is incorrect for two reasons. One, France hasn't even been edited since the fifth of May, at this point. 2. I would never vandalize a Wikipedia page; I always edit in good faith. And actually three: I love France, and any article relating to it is especially dear to me. So, using logic, this must be an incorrect accusation. But everyone makes mistakes. Have a good day!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 01:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

There is also a fourth reason: I myself haven't edited the article since the seventh of April: [19], and this edit was in compliance with a discussion that the gallery section be abandoned. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 01:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Crossposted from the blocking admins talk page: I am not sure I understand the reason for the block. Whatever else I could say, there does not appear to be any vandalism from looking at his contrib log to France or any other articles. The user actually reverted vandalism here and a not useful edit here. Earlier fix was for Nice. Is there a chance you confused this user with the vandals WW was reverting. --Marcinjeske (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

His? Tsk tsk. No, this user is a she. Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 04:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Bearian undid himself right away He musta screwed up something. Not sure what, but everyone makes innocent mistakes, and he self corrected it. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it was an innocent mistake, a royal screw-up, and I corrected it myself immediately, erasing what I thought would be embarrassing for all. I am very sorry for the mistake. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

5/8 DYK

On 8 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Davenport, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 01:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)