Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2016: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 158: Line 158:


===[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology|Scientology]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology|Scientology]]===
*{{u|Sfarney}} prohibited from (i) from editing articles related to Scientology or Scientologists, broadly defined, as well as the respective article talk pages and (ii) from participating in any Wikipedia process relating to those articles, including as examples but not limited to, [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]], [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]], [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]] and so forth, for a period of one year under Remedy 5.1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sfarney&diff=723029755&oldid=722934592] <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-size:3">[[User:The Wordsmith|'''The Wordsmith''']]</span><sup>[[User talk:The Wordsmith|Talk to me]]</sup> 15:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)



===[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku_Islands|Senkaku Islands]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku_Islands|Senkaku Islands]]===

Revision as of 15:34, 31 May 2016

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2016 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2016.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).


Yearly Logs (Full Log)
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

2016

Abortion

American politics 2

Ancient Egyptian race controversy

Armenia-Azerbaijan 2

Austrian economics

Article titles and capitalisation

  • Darkfrog24 is indefinitely topic banned from articles, discussions, and guidelines, explicitly including the manual of style, related to quotation marks and quotation styles, broadly interpreted. They may use quotes and quotation marks, and edit pages that include them, subject to normal editing rules (e.g. regarding edit warring). This ban may be appealed no sooner than 6 months after it is placed. Thryduulf (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • That topic ban replaced with: Darkfrog24 is indefinitely topic banned from the manual of style, and manual of style-related topics, specifically including quotation marks and quotation styles. This applies on all pages, including his and other's user talk pages. This may be appealed no sooner than 12 months from today (4 February 2016). Thryduulf (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Institited an indefinate ban as Darkfrog24 appears to be incapable of understanding the terms of the TBAN. See discussion at Arbitration Enforcement. No object to an unblock in a couple of weeks if Darkfrog24 confirms they now get it and will stop relitigating their case through TBAN clarifications. Spartaz Humbug! 23:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88

Climate change

HughD (talk · contribs) topic banned from climate change, broadly construed. AE discussion: [3] Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complementary and Alternative Medicine - Acupuncture

Electronic Cigarettes

Eastern Europe

Editing of Biographies of Living Persons

Falun Gong

An appeal to this sanction was declined at WP:AE per this discussion. Dennis Brown - 10:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GamerGate

MarkBernstein was blocked for 1 week for violating the discretionary sanction. Mike VTalk 00:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for 6 weeks for another breech of that topic ban. Courcelles (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinitely blocked after obviously intentional breach of sanctions. Acroterion (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Page-level sanctions
  • Brianna Wu: 500/30 restriction- editing prohibited to accounts newer than 30 days and/or with less than 500 edits. Gamaliel (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anita Sarkeesian: 500/30 restriction- editing prohibited to accounts newer than 30 days and/or with less than 500 edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genetically modified organisms

Gun control

India-Pakistan

  • Sigmabaroda blocked indefinitely 11 Jan 2016 for disruptive editing on Indian articles.[5]. Bishonen | talk 03:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC) (belated logging).[reply]
  • MBlaze LightningWP:1RR for 1 month within area; repeated edit warring --slakrtalk / 02:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • FreeatlastChitchatWP:1RR for 1 month within area; repeated edit warring. --slakrtalk / 02:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • TalhaZubairButtWP:1RR for 1 month within area; repeated edit warring. --slakrtalk / 02:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Truth should trump indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions relating to castes.[6] Bishonen | talk 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • MBlaze Lightning blocked 72 hours due to personal WP:1RR-restriction violation @ Research and Analysis Wing --slakrtalk / 04:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kashmir conflict and all articles related to the India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir (initially posted here):
    A 1 RR restriction. Any attempt, even if made in good faith, to do more than one revert in a 24 hour period will lead to an immediate block.
    A revert without discussion restriction. Any revert of any edit, however minor, that is done without an explanation on the talk page will lead to an immediate block.
    A civility restriction. Any suggestion that any editor is not editing in good faith will lead to an immediate block.
    An ethnicity claim restriction Any attempt to bring the purported or deduced or imagined ethnic or nationality identities of any users will lead to an immediate block. This includes an editor's own stated ethnic identity or nationality. Wikipedia uses reliable sources and the weighting of those sources to decide what to include, what not to include, and how the content should be stated in an article. Please stick to arguments based on those factors.
    --regentspark (comment) 13:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Towns Hill (talk · contribs) (formerly User:TalhaZubairButt) – Banned from the topic of conflicts between India and Pakistan and from anything to do with Bangladesh. Notified here. EdJohnston (talk) 15:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • FreeatlastChitchat indefinitely prohibited from all edits and pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed. The WordsmithTalk to me 14:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Axtramedium is indefinitely topic banned from Gurjara-Pratihara and related pages.[7] Bishonen | talk 14:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Interactions at GGTF

Landmark Worldwide

Liancourt Rocks

Longevity

Macedonia

Muhammad images

Palestine-Israel articles

Pseudoscience

Prem Rawat

Race and intelligence

Scientology

Senkaku Islands

September 11 conspiracy theories

Sexology

Shakespeare authorship question

Tea Party movement

The Troubles

Transcendental Meditation movement

Waldorf education