Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Boby3362 (talk | contribs)
16 edits
Boby3362 (talk | contribs)
16 edits
Line 591: Line 591:
== Eyeden ==
== Eyeden ==


*{{revisions|Eyeden (Musician)}}
*{{revisions|Eyeden (Singer)}}
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —[[User:Boby3362|Boby3362]] ([[User talk:Boby3362|talk]]) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —[[User:Boby3362|Boby3362]] ([[User talk:Boby3362|talk]]) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Eyeden was created by me I had all the reliable sources and reasons creating this article but user [[User:C.fred]] has deleted this article for giving me no reason what so ever and was keep making different excuses I suppose this Wikipedia user was reported by other users as well, he was being very offensive to my created article and I was putting so much hard work into it very disappointed I need it back.
Eyeden was created by me I had all the reliable sources and reasons creating this article but user [[User:C.fred]] has deleted this article for giving me no reason what so ever and was keep making different excuses I suppose this Wikipedia user was reported by other users as well, he was being very offensive to my created article and I was putting so much hard work into it very disappointed I need it back.

Revision as of 12:07, 19 February 2017


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:FreeFlyer_GUI_Screenshot.jpg

I submitted this for undeletion a couple of weeks ago, but it was archived before I received a response. The above image was deleted back in September due to "F6: Non-free media file with no non-free use rationale (TW)". I'm in a position at the software's owning company to provide such fair-use for screenshots of the tool, and I'd like a screenshot to exist on the page to improve its quality. Can this be undeleted or can I just upload another one without issue? 38.103.29.194 (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You can also upload a non free file, as long as it satisfies the WP:NFCC including that it is used. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for the direction. I'll follow those instructions and upload a new, appropriate image. B.cody.thompson (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Akbar

Good well-written article only deleted because it was created by a banned user —UserNumber (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@UserNumber: I restored it. That article wasn't eligible for deletion by G5. It was created by a sockpuppet, but not in violation of any block or ban, as far as I can tell from the block log of the sockmaster. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: Someone deleted it again. UserNumber (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems my assessment of the original WP:CSD#G5 deletion was incorrect; it did qualify. You would have to contact one of the deleting admins to request reconsideration, perhaps move the article to draft space so that it can be improved. If anyone makes a significant contribution to it, it would not be eligible for G5 deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: Can you give me the source of the page on my talk page? UserNumber (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@UserNumber: It might be better if you asked the deleting admin, DGG to userfy it for you, so you can work on improving it. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
From the contents I do not think there is any likelihood of notability. If you have references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements it would be better to start over DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bubblefett

my reason is that it states in the wikipedia guidelines that a user may put whatever they want in thier talkpage/homepage, bu it can not be mall intented, my page had a few illuminati mentions, but i was on my way to clean it up after deciding someone may bann me for it, when my page got flagged. And mypage specifically doent promote lluminati or its ideals or iffiliates, i dont praise it whatso ever, and my unhelpfull edits o cabildo counsel and others, i was already punished for majorly, and i learned. so it is in goodwill that i nicely ask that the wise wikipedia admin please correct the flagging of my page. i worke for 4 hours straight hours so please consider a lesser punishment. like a 5 day user page ban at MAX. I really just want to inform people like other wikipedia users, and when i get to my page ill remove all disrespectfull content. —Bubblefett (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bubblefett:  Not done. Not one single sentence on that page was appropriate for Wikipedia. You may not use Wikipedia as a web host, a social media platform, a means to promote your off-Wiki activities, an outlet for editorial commentary, and a number of other things. It isn't your personal web space. See Wikipedia:User pages for guidance.
The page isn't protected in any way, and you are not blocked, so there is nothing preventing you from creating your page again from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@bubblefett: it doent matter its my page and that took a lot of work for the cript, i mean i needed it its nt a social media platform at all, i dont even have socia media, im 13, so im holding you responsible for my reconstruction of my page and it shall be held up by wikpedia law!!! at least give me suggestin on what to wirte about nuka-cola, and dont say dont put innpropriate things on it, give me real advice. im trying not to get mad at you DELETING all my work, and there were 4 innaprpriate MENTIONS of illuminati, im not praisinf it, just making a joke, and fun game cartoon characters are not "innapropriate for wikipedia" and they user bio is a place of FREE WRITING. it says in the rules, ther was no rasism,sexism,promogity,nudity,or any other sots of innapropriate behavior. so help me by giving e tips on how to make a wiki user page on nuka-cola, and i wont ever bother or do "inapropriate things" again. deal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 14:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@Bubblefett: are you talking about the fictional beverage from Fallout 4? Normally we do not need detailed articles covering in-universe item descriptions. The place for that could be http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Nuka-Cola . To see an article that we do have like this see Duff Beer. A good place for you to write on the topic would be at Draft:Nuka-Cola. Remember this is a serious place, so it is not for jokes and entertainment. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@bubblefett:if a user wishes to find a certain item from a certain game, and hears that an element was in it, they may not know the name of the item, but may know its elements, so by using the vast Wikipedia website.com. they can acsess it, then find a link in the article, and find their misssing game item.etc. now im sure Wikipedia is serious, and if seriousness is your priority then check out another highly esteemed editor that has a ,"pun generator", or pictures of kittens saying, we see all you do. so im sure that if they are able to "inform the public" about silly things such as that, then i can do the same as well. all im asking is to have a link that goes to nuka-cola-quantum that reads, "you may be searching for, nuka-quantum". and you will never hear from me again, nor shall i bother you with oh so such "silly nonsense"(sarcasm included!) and my link can be all the way at the bottom. not even at the top.Irest my case, and dont try to pull Wikipedia law over my eyes, because you...will...lose....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 00:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bubblefett: As stated before, your user page is not protected, and you are not blocked, so there is nothing preventing you from putting whatever you want on that page, within reason. If you want to add a link, put it in. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@bubblefett: well my page was DELETED AFTER 4 HOURS OF WORK AND SACRIFICE WENT INTO IT!!!! then i have to start again, all i want is a link put in there what is so wrong about.......ooohhhhhhhhh, i get it, if i put a game thing in it, it would not be fair to not put another one ino it and it would beome a junk article, got it, no i need help on how to put links in and to get barnstars, im ready to change my ways!!!1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblefett (talk • contribs) 01:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enough. I've blocked this user indefinitely per WP:NOTHERE. I am sure that Bubblefett will find Wikia to be a better place to write their content on. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:The Empire of History/16

I have already posted an earlier request on this page. I would like for the last revised versions of these pages to be sent to my personal e-mail address, as attached to this Wikipedia account. I intend to transfer these pages to fiction.wikia.com. A response would be greatly appreciated. —The Empire of History (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to ask twice, this is the right spot to ask. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I know that is is, but I would like for a response to my inquiry. I've waited for weeks now. --The Empire of History (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your previous request was 1 day ago. Your request doesn't really have anything to do with improving the Wikipedia project. If someone can find the time to download all those pages and bundle them up into an email, it will happen, but please understand that this won't be a high priority for any admin. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But I was told by another administrator that here would be the place I could ask. Moreover, I had made a much earlier request back in December, related to one of the pages, but it had not received any response. And the reason I would like the pages is because they are necessary for work on wikia.com. Why is a simple request like this a big deal? It's my content, I spent months on it, and it was deleted without warning. I just would like it back to take to a website appropriate for it. --The Empire of History (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is the place to ask. You're asking a favor of an admin. A favor that will consume probably a half hour of an admin's valuable time, and that time wouldn't be spent in a way that benefits the Wikipedia project. It isn't our fault that you chose to spend months of time on pages that weren't suitable for Wikipedia, in violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST (I looked at one of them, quite impressive I must say). Please be patient. All I've had time for this weekend is to check in for a few minutes now and then. I have a backlog of real-life work to do before Monday, and then I'm looking at a 18 hour workday ahead of me. When I take a break to do something here, I want my efforts to make a difference to the project. Believe me, if I have a block of time, I'm happy to help you, but if you need this urgently, I'm sorry but you have to wait. There are no deadlines on Wikipedia.
You might also try asking the deleting admin ESkog. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did ask the deleting administrator, but he referred me to here in the first place! Why do people have to be so uncooperative? Finding time for other people's requests, all the requests listed below and above this one, but they won't for me!! And who cares if it benefits the Wikipedia project! This is a request that I made, and I thought the requests were supposed to be fulfilled in due and prompt order...But well, I can't control the behavior of other people who rip into me and denigrate me for everything that I do! I'm done with this request! GOODBYE! --The Empire of History (talk) 03:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Withdrawn. Lectonar (talk) 12:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Kerr (Chinese art)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Nephets213 (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a number of amendments to the entry

1, references to published works by Rose Kerr have been cited , and explained

2. Disambiguation of the art historian from the founder of the Girl Guides, who has the same name

As this is the first time I have ever attempted to create a wikipedia page, I have found the process difficult to understand. Many of the comments received were expressed in very technical terms which again, was not easy for a layperson like myself

Done Has been draftified. Lectonar (talk) 13:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yaroslava Darkina

Important information which should not have been deleted —POTKC (talk) 06:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhu Tomari

File:Battle of Naseby monument.jpg

Request temporary undeletion to retrieve authorship info - it was copied to Commons without a source. —Kelly hi! 01:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image information page said "Close up view of the Cromwell Monument at the site of the Battle of Naseby. The mounument is located near the site of the Parlimentarian positions.". The uploader was User:JamesRM, and it was uploaded on 20:07, 16 August 2005. There is no explicit source mentioned. The GFDL licence was included. Edit summaries say the same thing. In these early days of image uploads we just assumed that the uploader was the photographer. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've deleted it from Commons as missing source/permission. Kelly hi! 06:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JAS Worldwide

I wish to request a copy of the deleted page to use as a guide to redo please. and then click the "Save page" button below —Cmroberson06 (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmroberson06: Please ask the deleting administrator Premeditated Chaos to consider restoring the article to your user space or draft space. Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11 it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sky Q

The new premium service from Sky UK —Spike18 06 (talk) 11:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spike18 06: So? Nothing prevents you from creating that article. The original deleted article had just one unsourced sentence in it, not worth restoring, and would be speedily deleted if restored. I suggest working on it in your sandbox and then moving it to main space (or submit via WP:AFC if you are associated with Sky Q), when it's fully fleshed out and in compliance with WP:CORP. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kf4wvk/sandbox

I, Kf4wvk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kf4wvk (talk) 16:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to continue to improve the details and citations. —Kf4wvk (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kf4wvk: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Mahabaleshwar Morje

Looking for relevant references Intend to continue editing the page Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below}} Pradnyam (talk) 18:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gary Loyd Stewart

Ambernarro (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Lachrymist

I, TheLachrymistFilm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheLachrymistFilm (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why Wikipedia Sucks

Per discussion at User talk:Legoktm, the page should be restored as redirect to Criticism of Wikipedia. Then-admin deleted the page based on the older, 2006 discussion but was unaware of the more recent, 2008 discussion. Currently former admin says go ahead and undelete the revisions before the "vandalism" one. —George Ho (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Paint (musical group)

I, Jeepster33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeepster33 (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jeepster33: This was restored last year without any improvements on the page. What do you plan to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have a revised version to post  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepster33 (talk • contribs) 11:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The role of clowns in modern society

I would like to improve the page, making the notability clear. I would like the page userfied. —Riceissa (talk) 02:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stratifyd

I, Mirrorsbyjt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mirrorsbyjt (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to work on it again after not touching it for a while, but it was deleted beforehand. —Mirrorsbyjt (talk) 02:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation: Wirtgen GmbH

I, 82.210.232.252, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 82.210.232.252 (talk) 06:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We didn't know about the six months deadline. We will edit the page according to the rules. —82.210.232.252 (talk) 06:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft:Wirtgen GmbH restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:U.S. Alliance to End the Hitting of Children

I, Smith55555, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smith55555 (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JCITA

The reason for deletion was "The subject of this article does not appear to exist" while it exists under a slightly different whole name —Apokrif (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Apokrif: Well, the deleted article has only a single sentence in it: The Joint Counter Intelligence Agency is a school comprised of several intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA, DIA) charged with training operatives in interrogation of individuals of specific interest to the national security of the United States. Nothing else, no citations, no links, totally unverifiable.
That article was deleted over 10 years ago. I'd say if it were created anew, it should be under the full name, with JCITA being a redirect to it. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Gryphons Ice Hockey Club

The Leeds Gryphons Ice Hockey Club is a notable club competing in two British Universities Ice Hockey Association leagues and was the play-off champion of division 2 non-checking in the 2015-2016 season. The club is still very active and would like to maintain the Wikipedia page —194.80.232.16 (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paul Castro Jr

I, Lunasasukeaeris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lunasasukeaeris (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New material available for credible sources. —Lunasasukeaeris (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yujian Zheng

I either created or substantially enlarged this article on a respected academic, and do not remember receiving notification that he might be considered non-notable; if it is a problem with lack of referencing, I can try to find some citations Objectivesea (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC) —Objectivesea (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • To prove notability we need writing by independent people about the topic. see WP:PROF (not just the university they work for). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Midas King

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Objectivoo (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Midas King is an upcoming artist that was recently signed by SONY/MPRE, we noticed that you blocked the articles about him, I will like to apologize on behalf of Midas King because the previous writer was inexperienced. Please kindly remove the ban so that Midas King can join the Wikipedia community. Kindly check the latest post and stop the deletion because it has references and sources this time. Thanks for your understanding .[reply]

  • First, the article was deleted as clear advertising and a mere "upcoming" is not what satisfies our standards, and that actually suggests he's not notable since there would be no need for advertising if he satisfied our standards; next, you'll have to show exactly how our standards and policies can now be satisfied and what you plan to use in it. No one gets an automatic inheritance for an article here, and please note WP:What Wikipedia is not as it's our main policy. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly. You don't merit a Wikipedia article if you're up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. If Midas King cannot meet any criteria in WP:MUSICBIO then he cannot have a Wikipedia article. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hemovanadin

Per http://boingboing.net/2017/02/14/watching-wikipedias-extincti.html - article was created as a stub with sources, but after being overwritten with a copypaste copyvio it was G12'd. Requesting that the article be restored to its earlier state, minus the copyrighted revisions. —McGeddon (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. The copyvio material was from a couple of recent anon edits. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sivop

I don't know why the page was deleted... —Jaberahmad (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion log says it was deleted in accordance with WP:A7 (no credible assertion of significance) and WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion). For either of those reasons it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You would have to contact the deleting admin Iridescent, who may be willing to consider restoring it for userfication or moving to draft space for improvement, before publishing the article in main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jaberahmad, I've restored it temporarily for you to work on at Draft:Sivop; please do not move it back to article space unless and until it complies with Wikipedia's rules on sourcing and formatting. Please also read—and comply with—the notifications at Managing a conflict of interest and Obligation de transparence en matière de contributions rémunérées; Wikipedia takes a very dim view of people who attempt to use the site for advertising. ‑ Iridescent 08:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rising Phoenix World Championships

I object to this article being deleted via proposed deletion. —Edgeweyes (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now? Well, in that case:
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doorpk Pakistan

article i written with sources, but after being overwritten with a copypaste or upload images its show me error i don't know why error display me again and againg i am trying to create my article last month but its show me again and again error. Requesting that the article be restored to its earlier state, minus the copyrighted revisions. thanks in advance —MirzaAnas (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Article is not deleted, but currently tagged for A7 speedy deletion, which IMO is the correct assessment in its current state. Request text here based on copypaste from "Hemovanadin" section above. --Finngall talk

Henryk (Henk/Hank) Targowski

Hank passed away two weeks ago. He has left a remarkable impact on musical scene and Portobello Market. https://www.discogs.com/artist/2239346-Henry-Hank-Targowski We would love to keep documenting his life on Wikipedia. —81.187.185.117 (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:NOTMEMORIAL? Memorializing someone isn't what Wikipedia is for.
Also I am unable to find any deleted article starting with Henryk, Henk, or Hank in main, draft, or AFC space, having the last name Targowski. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kickboxing at the World Games 2017

{{subst:refund|1= Kickboxing at the World Games 2017 |2= I request the undeletion of this article because there is a similar article titled "Korfball at the World Games 2017" and I used enough references. It might have been deleted by mistake.Kickboxer2017 (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Identify Fusion

A draft was created as part of Articles For Creation in 2014, rejected on the grounds that the term is a neologism only used by one group of researchers, and moved to draft space, where it was eventually (Jan 2105) deleted as abandoned. Since then, the term has become more common and is used in a wider range of research. Wikipedia needs an article on this topic, and I would like to help the author improve this draft to be suitable for namespace. MartinPoulter (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC) —MartinPoulter (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apprise Software, Inc.

I, Superasperatus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Superasperatus (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Superasperatus: The requested title is actually a deleted redirect to Apprise Software · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. That wasn't deleted as G13. It was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion), so it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You can ask the deleting admin Fastily to consider restoring it to draft space or your user space for improvement, prior to submitting the article for review at WP:AFC, prior to re-publishing it in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Watermill Center

I, 0wl464, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 0wl464 (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ac.kimjongnam.jpg

Reason: this image was deleted in 2005 under CSD I4 (now known as F4)- no licensing information. Kim Jong-nam is now dead, so I believe a non-free image of him can now be used on Wikipedia for fair use reasons, as there is no free alternative. —Chessrat (talk, contributions) 14:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hatteras Yachts

I, 24.61.220.85, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.61.220.85 (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Attachment fostering

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) MattLewis48 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Attachment_fostering&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Attachment_fostering&action=edit&redlink=1

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —MattLewis48 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death

Plan to redirect this to List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by age, but I would like the former contents restored per {{R with history}}. —--Nevé–selbert 21:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have just created a redirect for you, but you could have done that too. Since the page was contributed by a sock of some-other blocked user, we wish to avoid having unneeded contributions from them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Graeme Bartlett: Would it really be bad form to restore the edit history, though? It's just that I'm just really interested in prime ministerial trivia, and I wanted to read some it from the history in my spare time. Well, thanks anyway.--Nevé–selbert 16:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Target Open House

I, Daylen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I would like to update the intro section and merge it into the Target (company) article. Daylen (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sentinel Capital Partners

I kindly object to this article being deleted via PROD and amicably request the restoration of this article so that it may be improved. This article was a stub that relied too heavily on the company's website. However, this article could easily be improved with verifiable, objective information. A cursory Google search will show ample articles written about the topic. The page was initially made in serve of WikiProject Private Equity, the Private Equity WikiProject Task Force. This article was recently deleted through an expired PROD. The subject is worth inclusion in Wikipedia and I'd be happy to do the legwork to substantially improve the article from the stub and source it heavily. Thank you. —Southrunner10 (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geometric_(company) page deleted

Some one deleted my company page —203.199.148.151 (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geometric (company), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lalita Sharma

I, Wolfdane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wolfdane (talk) 11:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfdane: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geometric (company)

I, 203.199.148.151, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 203.199.148.151 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harris Publishing Inc.

This was my first attempt at a Wikipedia page, and though not perfect, I see no reason for a speedy deletion to have occurred. I am requestiong this undeletion in hopes of having the opportunity to see what was wrong and improve it so that this article (and others in the future) might add to the community. —Ajrupp (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • In this case you should ask the deleting admin User talk:Vanamonde93. I think there was a claim of importance, in the number of magazines published. But half the article seemed to be an advert promoting David Harris. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Euphorium Bakery

I, Christian139, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Christian139 (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to continue to edit the submission —Christian139 (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan

This page was deleted for SPAM, but this is not the case. Can it please be restored? —Mktgtechnews (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KDDL Limited

The subject is notable (per WP:LISTED and and the content could plausibly be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view. "Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." Please return the article to draft space and I will request an edit from a voluntary editor as required by WP:COI. I, now, understand how to properly create an article through this process. ——አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Janweh64: Already restored to Draft:KDDL Limited. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: The accompanying talk page which include my declaration of COI are missing. This also applies to the two other undeletion requests below.—አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collins Wisdom

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Nick2641 (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Repeatedly created hoax under Wisdom Collins. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legs4Africa

The subject is notable per WP:NCORP as shown by references: the Guadian 1, the Guardian 2, BBC News 2, BBC 2, Sunderland Echo more here... ——አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Tara

Per WP:MUSICBIO subject is notable per criterion #2 ——አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's already been restored to Draft:Miss Tara. Please work on it there. Without improvements, it would be deleted again from main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel J. Arbess

Page was basically accurate, accurately sourced and cited. I did not create it myself, but it was factual and apparently relevant to some. respectfully, Daniel Arbess — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.13.150 (talk) 21:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ao far from being factual, it is from the beginning on full of poorly supported praise. The first sentence has " recognized for his prescient calls" referenced to a mere mention and his own essay (not listed as such in the reference). The majority of the references are in fact his own essays. Some are specified as his; some have the authorship information information not shown. Most of the others report his own views at a variety of conferences. The subject of an article is generally not a good person to judge its objectivity. DGG ( talk ) 02:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decision-making software

Undo its merge into the Decision support system article as discussed on the Decision support system Talk page —Franzo (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It isn't clear that anything needs to be undeleted, or even requires administrator attention. Splitting out the content of one article into another can be done by any editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anachronist, the Decision-making software article requires undeletion because some content was lost during its merge into Decision support systems. If you would be so kind... Franzo (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Franzo: Neither article has been deleted, and neither article has any contribution history that has been deleted. It is all there in the history for any editor to access. Again, there is nothing to do here, nothing to undelete, because nothing has been deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Axlfolie

This page was correctly edited and formatted to show Axlfolie significance and importance to music production. The page did not display any bias opinion or any sort of advertising for the artist. It had a general biography and background information that could be added to and expanded by other Wikipedia users. There was not any copyright infringement as it had when deleted previously. Information in the article was cited properly as needed with sources to avoid any sort or plagiarism or copyright infringement. —Chrisasanchez8 (talk) 23:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Restored as an expired PROD, and sent to AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Wan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Gracewan2016 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC) I am real person and want to try Wikipedia for the first time.[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a social media platform, it's an encyclopædia project. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Article was A7-speedied twice today and another iteration is currently at AfD. --Finngall talk 04:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Creating Draft:Corrine Sandler

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jenny Tripp (talk) 10:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Creating Draft:Corrine Sandler[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:T.N. Ananthakrishnan

Draft:T.N. Ananthakrishnan

Would like to resume work on this draft and then click the "Save page" button below —Ramnwiki (talk) 13:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deskera

Deskera Inc- Hi there, we noticed our company does not have a wikipedia page. A quick check of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deskera_(2nd_nomination) showed us that in the past, we had one.

We are not sure what content was on the previous wikipedia page, or who was responsible for writing it. We're a totally new team based out of San Francisco and we'd like the opportunity to rewrite an objective article and submit it to wikipedia. Let us know what we can do. Thanks!

Pallavi Sud & Rebecca Neufeld

  • Hi! You stated that you're a new team out of San Francisco, but the deleted article looks like it was about a company in Singapore. Is this the same company and if it is, you need to state what your relation is to that company. One of the past issues with the page was that it appeared that the company had paid someone to create an article for them and this status was never disclosed, which is required by WP:COI guidelines. You've disclosed here that you work with the company, but we'd need a little clarification here.
Now if this is the Singapore company, we can't restore the article here but you can ask Jo-Jo Eumerus if they will send you a copy of the page. I would really recommend that you check in with the WP:TEAHOUSE for help constructing the page and honestly, I'd check there first before really moving forward with any page creation. Something to be careful about is that most companies don't pass WP:NCORP regardless of how successful they are - we actually have million and sometimes billion dollar companies that fail notability guidelines on here because of the lack of non routine and non-PR coverage. New companies rarely get this type of coverage. The Teahouse would be great at helping with this. I would also recommend making any potential article through WP:AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stephanie_Sandler

Used as historical reference for gymnasts in the local province. Request draft to be reinstated as wikipedia article. —IsadoraDS (talk) 21:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Johnny Symons

Dchein (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined. Start it over from scratch. The deleted history includes a copyright violation of http://itvs.org/films/ask-not/filmmaker and a revision that is so promotional in tone that it would need to be rewritten. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Đồng Hồ Tissot

I am a person with a passion for clocks, watches, as a collector, I can learn a lot about watches on Wikipedia, but all the information is in English, this causing many difficulties for those who want to find information about watches like me, so I wanted to translate the information to Vietnamese people Vietnam are readable, so I have to translate all Tissot Tissot Watches Vietnamese is, please do not delete my post to all of them could read . (Tôi là một người có niềm đam mê với đồng hồ, đồng hồ đeo tay, như là một nhà sưu tập, tôi có tìm hiểu rất nhiều thông tin về đồng hồ trên Wikipedia, nhưng tất cả đều là thông tin tiếng Anh, điều này gây ra rất nhiều khó khăn cho những người muốn tìm kiếm thông tin về đồng hồ giống như tôi, vì thế tôi muốn dịch ra thông tin tiếng Việt để mọi người Việt Nam đều có thể đọc được, vì thế tôi đã dịch bài Tissot sang tiếng Việt là Đồng Hồ Tissot, xin vui lòng đừng xóa bài viết của tôi để tất cả mọi người đều có thể đọc được.) —Vanduonghaitrieu10 (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • None of this shows how it will satisfy our main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not. "passion" is never what gets an article here because it's never a convincing claim.

List of UEFA European Championship hat-tricks

I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —S.A. Julio (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@S.A. Julio: I restored it to main space. Feel free to userfy it yourself if you want, but this did not look like a valid G5 deletion to me. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of UEFA European Championship own goals

I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —S.A. Julio (talk) 02:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@S.A. Julio: I restored this to User:S.A. Julio/List of UEFA European Championship own goals. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaj Eroc

someone on twitter purposely deleted my account —Jcakamril (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That page isn't an account, it's a deleted article about a non-notable musician. It's been created so many times in violation of Wikipedia inclusion criteria that it has now been protected from re-creation.
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramaj Eroc, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Amakuru (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it was Ymblanter who closed the original deletion discussion (3.5 years ago). I just deleted the most recent creation of the article, and salted it per the decision of the original AfD, and the fact that it has been recreated at least twice since. Other than that, the above advice sounds good. Thanks!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eerste Pastorie Winburg

I, Elefant222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Elefant222 (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Alwin Harris

Can you please restore the previously deleted article to my userspace so that I can compare and improve the article. Thanks. "Save page" button below —Gieenet (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gieenet: I have restored the article and all the deleted contribution history to Draft:Colin Alwin Harris rather than userfying it. Due to the conflict of interest concerns evident in the AFD discussion, I have protected the main space article from being re-created. This should go through review before publishing it in main space, so please submit it for review when you are finished. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We need trees association

Is there anything more important than trees and nature and saving them? —Alishahryari (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alishahryari: What's that got to do with Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion?
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Howard Sachs

Csvane (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Artists Records

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Lynnanchio (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to find out why a page was deleted, and your site is very very confusing.

Northamerica 1000 deleted this page, I can find no explanation as to why: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Artists_Records&oldid=765045322

How do I get it undeleted? It should not have been deleted

This is what needs to be UNDONE:

10:43, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-66)‎ . . International Artists ‎ (→‎top: -

For the classical record label, see International Artists Records.

. Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records) (current)

10:43, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-36)‎ . . List of record labels: I–Q ‎ (- * International Artists Records. Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-8)‎ . . Draft:Crescendo! ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-4)‎ . . Handbell ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-68)‎ . . God Bless the Red Krayola and All Who Sail With It ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-4)‎ . . Daniels Recital Hall ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:41, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+1,613)‎ . . Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records ‎ (Closing debate, result was delete) (current)


Lynn Andersen International Artists Records

@Lynnanchio: No explanation? The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records isn't sufficient? You had ample opportunity to participate there. The notice was on the article for at least a week.
Furthermore, it seems that you haven't read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Do so now, because you clearly have a conflict of interest here. Be aware that you should not make substantive changes to any article with which you have a conflict of interest. You should propose your changes on the talk page instead. Wikipedia is not a publicity medium and should never be used that way.
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MAKE award

To put the old content in draftspace, for improvement or final deletion —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel J. Arbess (2)

|1= Daniel J. Arbess |2= I didn't create the page, but I would often use it when searching for some of Mr. Arbess' articles and would refer people to the page. He is an investor/commentator with interesting viewpoints and is often on tv. It would be very helpful if you would restore the page. Thank you.

Woven Words Publishers (OPC) Private Limited

This was the first article I wrote and I see it was deleted by someone but I would request the administrator not to delete it because it was not meant for any promotion or advertisement. Where it costs a lot to self publish books, they publish books for free and according to some local body they are about to open libraries where people can read books for free. There are similar pages that exist on wikipedia. The reference link that takes to an article published by The FreePress Journal newspaper Mumbai edition proves the authenticity of the publishing house. Hoping to hear from you soon. —Aqeeq Ahmed (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eyeden

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Boby3362 (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Eyeden was created by me I had all the reliable sources and reasons creating this article but user User:C.fred has deleted this article for giving me no reason what so ever and was keep making different excuses I suppose this Wikipedia user was reported by other users as well, he was being very offensive to my created article and I was putting so much hard work into it very disappointed I need it back.[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=766300142"