Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
JohnCD (talk | contribs)
130,355 edits
Line 623: Line 623:
*{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics}}
*{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics}}
<i></i>I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. [[User:Aberleant|Aberleant]] ([[User talk:Aberleant|talk]]) 15:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
<i></i>I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. [[User:Aberleant|Aberleant]] ([[User talk:Aberleant|talk]]) 15:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

== User talk:200.104.240.11/Harassment ==

*{{revisions|User talk:200.104.240.11/Harassment}}
Deleted with the false claim that it was an attack page. In fact, it was a record of a sustained campaign of harassment against me. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner. [[Special:Contributions/200.83.101.225|200.83.101.225]] ([[User talk:200.83.101.225|talk]]) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC) -[[Special:Contributions/200.83.101.225|200.83.101.225]] ([[User talk:200.83.101.225|talk]]) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:39, 6 January 2015


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

McCall College

Article was deleted before I could return to edit. I do not have a copy of all my work and would appreciate the recovery of the work so that the article can be modified. -DrLBWilliams (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darick Robertson

I own the photo and copyright to the photo and have provided reference to said image already -Darick Robertson (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC);[reply]

  • The image was clearly labelled as by Aaron Munter. Who owns the rights? You or him? In any case you need to email OTRS to formally confirm the license and release before we can act. We almost certainly need to hear from Aaron too. you probably should read Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials too. Spartaz Humbug! 09:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Techmoan

Because it took me a long time to write the page and I would at least like the content back if the page cant be restored on wiki. Or could it please be returned to the draft stage so I can work on it and meet the requirements before republishing it? I do understand it my need to be rewritten for wikipedia but I would like my writing just for my own use as well, and as a starting point to re write the page. Thanks. -The barbarian of Trevor (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have userfied it to User:The barbarian of Trevor/Techmoan. Work on it or take whatever content you want to go somewhere other than Wikipedia. As far as I can tell this is simply not an appropriate topic or an article, and cannot be until Techmoan gains the type of independent coverage in reliable secondary sources that are needed to show notability and allow verification of content. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harden Askenasy

I, Mdujovny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mdujovny (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Clue: To show notabiliity we need what others have written about him, rather than his own writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

talk:Articles for creation/Bertheau's law

I, The vertigo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The vertigo (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)

I, 88.203.164.1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 88.203.164.1 (talk) 09:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Welsh Local Elections 2012

I, 94.5.187.3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 94.5.187.3 (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

101 Ranch Oil Company

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jcmcapital (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Page Name: 101 Ranch Oil Company This is a significant article about CONOCO's first oil well and CONOCO's founders, with much of the information already provided to the CONOCO museum, Ponca City. At some point someone deleted the footnotes, and I have no idea how to restore them. I could use your help. Jim Murray (McCaskey's youngest living grandson).[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bob Wingo

I, DonegalWinner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DonegalWinner (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 15:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin_Atlantic_Flight_43

Virgin Flight 43 Emergency Landing is an ongoing current event. Speedy deleting it under A7 makes no sense, please reinstate the article. People look to wikipedia for unbiased just-the-facts content for current events around the world. This is one. As time passes it's likely that this article will grow to include links to the AAIB report for the incident. Speedy Deleting it while the event is ongoing and people are looking for information about relatives etc is very unhelpful. Does popularity (views) not get considered when speedy deleting an article?

 Not done. Please read WP:NOT#NEWSPAPER. It seems very unlikely that this incident will be notable enough for an encyclopedia article - see also WP:EVENT. I do not think it even meets the lower standard of WP:AIRCRASH for mention in an airport, airline or aircraft article. You can discuss this with the deleting administrator, NawlinWiki, and if he does not agree you can go to WP:Deletion review, but my advice is that you will be wasting your time, unless this story turns out to be more than "airliner makes emergency landing with undercarriage problem, nobody hurt". JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Marxism

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -207.180.139.66 (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted and redirected to Frankfurt School after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Samwalton9 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phyllis McCrady

To continue editting Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Cgoodale1 (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Productions (US)

I, Bcsheehan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bcsheehan (talk) 19:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roy Oppenheim

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sociallyfein (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Monroe County, Indiana

This page was deleted as an empty category, but it is no longer empty. -—Granger (talk · contribs) 21:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bagillt heritage society

Article needs further editing to improve relevance and show citations -Chrisowensbagillt (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:25, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Chrisowensbagillt:  Not done. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary). Not many local organizations like this can pass that test. If you think you can provide independent references to show notability, reply below here and I will "userfy" the article - move it into a sub-page in your "user space" where you can work on it; but if not, it would be a waste of your time. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derwin Pereira

I would like to request an undeletion of this entry, since the entry's subject is a well-known public figure in Southeast Asia, and heavily involved in US and Indonesia's relations. The deletion was originally made because the entry was written by a banned user: I'd like to write/edit the entry from scratch, so could you please remove the ban? -10:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Mollmichaella (talk)

  • I'm somewhat leery of doing this since the sockpuppet in question (User:Mamadoutadioukone) is someone who frequently made up new ones. You're a brand new user and I'll be painfully honest: the first question on everyone's mind is whether or not you are a new sockpuppet of Mamadoutadioukone. I'm actually mildly tempted to run you through SPI just to make sure that you aren't related to this person because the socking has been fairly persistent. If you're not related then this SPI will clear you of that concern. If you are, then this would result in the new account getting blocked as a sockpuppet. What is kind of pushing me to do this is that you've created a new article (Lazada Indonesia) that is fairly promotional in how it was written. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mollmichaella: I agree with Tokyogirl and, unless she gets there first, will add your account who has added your account to be checked as part of the SPI (sockpuppet investigation). If you are not connected with the Mamadoutadioukone ring of paid editors, you have nothing to fear. In any case, the existing article will not be undeleted: what you should do is, prepare a draft at Draft:Derwin Pereira and, if it is accepted, ask MER-C, the administrator who protected the title, to unprotect it so that the draft can be moved to the main encyclopedia. I am sorry if this all seems unwelcoming, but Wikipedia suffers greatly from paid promotional editing, and will become just another internet advertising site unless we can control it. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. I understand that you need to look into this, and I absolutely don't mind. I have no connection to the banned user, and I'd be more than happy to upload the draft as suggested. As for Lazada Indonesia, I was just writing about it as part of my interest in Indonesia, and it seemed appropriate, following many mentions of the website in the press around the festive shopping season. If you all agree it's not a suitable entry, I can start a conversation in the Talk Page regarding suggested edits.Mollmichaella (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:File-Tej_Narayan_Pandey.jpg

I have taken this photo from my personal camera.so i would like to request you please do not delete "Save page" button below -Ankit Tiwari (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Sessions - Would like to remove the issue and resubmit

My article was deleted for 2 reasons. First, for a reference to IMDB about a movie that Angel was in, however on the page was her bio. That was the problem. The other issue as to do with information in the "infobox" namely Singer/Songwriter. I can remove that, however I see many other article with the exact same title. Why is it an issue on my article. Angel is a Singer/Songwriter. Can I re-paste the code and start over or do I have to wait for you to undelete my article first. Thanks. Demetrius Guidry -16:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)108.251.108.176 (talk)

@Demetrius Guidry:.  Not done. The page Draft:Angel Sessions was deleted because it was a copyright violation, copied from IMDb. I know that IMDB article has your name on it, but copyright has serious legal implications, and it is not enough that someone on the end of a wire says he wrote it. We have to be certain that the actual copyright owner understands and agrees to the terms of Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license, which allows any reader to copy, modify and re-use for any purpose including commercial. If you want to release this material for use in Wikipedia, the way to do that is explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. JohnCD (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CAMP: A FASD Community

CAMP: A FASD Community is an up an coming nonprofit organization affiliated with DePaul University, Northwestern University, and the American Camp Association. The sole and explicit intent of the article is to organize and concise the over 100 pages of our operations manual, and to make this information available to public. No advertising is needed given the clientele and the organizations we are partnering with. The operations manual for our organizations can be provided to entities seeking validity. -Nicholastassone (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicholastassone: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about organizations and companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning organizations or companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause.
I am afraid you have not understood what Wikipedia is about - not your fault, we do not explain it as well as we should to new users. It is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board site for up-and-coming organizations to tell the world about themselves. As the organization's CEO, you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and should not be writing about it here, see also the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Sessions

I am the owner of the IMDB page. I am the person who wrote that article. Do not copy someone else's material and put it in Wiki. To prevent any controversy I will remove the reference to IMDB completely. Also how do I fix the Singer/Songwriter issue. Thanks again. Demetrius Guidry 108.251.108.176 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC) -108.251.108.176 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a case of removing a reference to IMDb: you must either make a copyright release or write the material in different words, without copying sentences or even WP:Close paraphrasing. I don't see any "singer/songwriter issue" except that an early version which was speedy-deleted was titled "Singer/songwriter Angel Sessions." That wasn't the reason for deletion, but in fact we don't put occupations in article titles like that, the right title for an article about a person is just their name, unless something needs to be added to distinguish them from others with the same name. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do kind of have to warn you that there's really no true ownership of stuff on IMDb, as Huong Hoang learned to her dismay when they posted her age on her profile. Yes, they do try to make the person or company happy, but ultimately the only people who own an IMDb page... is IMDb. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Burt C. Hopkins draft

I, Brittany9476, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brittany9476 (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Brittany9476: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Fandel

I, Reinkefj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. john (talk) 23:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dhansheel Kumar

This page is created by myself and does not harms anyone and it is not illegal and purily created by me, so kindly restore my page -Dhansheel kumar (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was deleted via AfD, where it was decided that Kumar (yourself, I presume) did not pass notability guidelines. You've already been warned about re-creating an article for the film Be Quiet (which was also deleted at AfD for notability reasons), so please be aware that continually re-adding pages can lead to you being blocked. Repeatedly re-adding pages deleted at AfD and not going through the proper channels for re-creation (deletion review) can be seen as disruptive and since you appear to be editing to try to add yourself and your films to Wikipedia, it can also be seen as very promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually... it looks like this is all you're trying to do, as you also appear to be trying to get around the salting and deletions at Shubham Prakash by re-creating the article at User:Gautam7jan. I hate to sound like the mean editor, but I don't see where you're here to edit about anything other than yourself, so I'm going to ask for you to be blocked. Since I started one of the AfDs I'm technically involved, but if anyone else here admin-wise wants to do it, I'd be much obliged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done I'm going to save others the time- the article was deleted and the editor has been blocked, so restoration in any way is pretty unlikely. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dhansheel Kumar

This is my page created by myself only and i am the administrator for the wikipedia page named Dhansheel kaumar. so, kindly restore my page as soon as possible. it's a humble request from my side -182.66.18.168 (talk) 10:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done and will not be done This won't be done. It's extremely unlikely that it will be restored anytime soon and even besides that, you've been blocked for re-creating the various pages so many times. Trying to request the page get restored by posting under an IP can be seen as WP:BLOCK EVASION. I'll admit that it's extremely unlikely that you will be unblocked, but if you want to be unblocked then you need to sign back into your account and ask SuperMarioMan to unblock you, although I will warn you that any unblocking will hinge upon you not re-creating any of these pages. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What you have not understood is that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves - see WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also forgot to mention that there is no ownership of pages on Wikipedia and that you are not the administrator of the page even if you are the individual or one of his representatives. All pages must pass notability guidelines in some form or fashion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

glee programming language

I am the author of this programming language and use it every day. The language is available through my website "WithGLEE.com" as a free download and has been since about 2001. I did not create the original article or contribute to it in any way. However, I did read it once and found it correct, informative, and useful to anyone making an inquiry about the language. It has recently been called to my attention that the article no longer exists (and I have confirmed that). I think the article should exist and would like to know 1) Why it was removed?; 2) What it would take to reinstate it?

GLEE is "not" a commercial venture though that should not matter (there is article about Ford I am sure). It "is" a very useful language. Since I didn't create the article (nor do I know who did) I don't think it should be considered some kind of "vanity" page. Nowhere in the article I remember reading do I remember my name mentioned and it is nowhere mentioned at WithGLEE.com.

I do believe it is a useful and important work. While development has been latent for some time, it is still in development and it has always been usable and accessible in the form described.

Your respectful attention to this inquiry is warmly requested.

Thanks .... Todd B. Marshall Creator of the GLEE programming language -WithGLEE (talk) 12:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WithGLEE: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glee (programming language), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mailer diablo (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
The criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tommy Sotomayor

I, Freddiestoner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Freddiestoner (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mat Gleason

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Empress-of-angels (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Empress-of-angels: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HegedusAndras.jpg

File was deleted as "Unused non-free media" that was only unused as removed by now blocked user. File was used on András Hegedüs and has been reinstated on article by JamesBWatson reversion here -KylieTastic (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The_Bloody_Alboz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -TheBloodyAlboz05 (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. We will not restore A7 deletions here, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've left a message on their talk page about the potential COI username and basic notability for bands/performers. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:QTOBR

I, Pstaylor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pstaylor (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC) I have been collecting more source material to complete this article. Please let me have what I have already written. -Pstaylor (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council

I am a member of Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council. Its been 6 years we have established it. We have already our facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/teambbsc/ . And a page https://www.facebook.com/teambbsc . we already stepped to create our own website. It needs some time. So I/We wanted to create an article of our organization 'Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council' on Wikipedia. i was going to add our logo and events details on this morning. But i got that its been deleted. Please inform me what i need to add in this article to be on Wiki -কথন (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The issue is that ultimately there was nothing there to show how your group is ultimately notable enough to warrant an entry on Wikipedia. Just existing as a student council is not enough to pass notability guidelines- the group would have to have received coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) that are independent of your group and in places that would be considered reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines. This usually means that your group has received in-depth coverage in newspapers and other media outlets that are not affiliated with your group or school. There was also an issue with promotion since you listed the group's goals and objectives in a manner that came across as you trying to promote the group. This may have been unintentional, but that's part of the reason why Wikipedia typically tends to recommend that people with a conflict of interest (WP:COI) not create their own page since it's so easy to make something seem promotional when that wasn't the intent. Offhand I don't know that the group would pass notability guidelines because the notability requirements on here are fairly strict (WP:ORG) and a quick search did not really bring up anything to show that the Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council has received enough news and media coverage to prove otherwise. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Knowledge Steez

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.167.107.11 (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.167.107.11 (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my understanding, the page was deleted for wrong reasons. The page depicts the information about a portal that has gained huge popularity in India and is serving as an educational portal too. The page also mentiones its achievements as a non for profit organizations and the different initiatives it has taken to make people aware of their rights in ots best possible capacity. If even this statement of pacts turns out to be advertisement, I believe advertisement and statement of facts would be synonymous then. Kindly make a review and undelete the page. I will be highly grateful for this kindness of yours.

  • Not done Advertisement and statements of facts are not synonymous on Wikipedia. They are very, very different. This is where Wikipedia differs from other sites that would be considered routine database websites where you can be promotional and it's accepted, even encouraged by the webmasters. The long and short is that the page was still promotional and even then, I don't see where the organization passes notability guidelines. It doesn't matter how good their work is (WP:NOTSOAPBOX), if they haven't received coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the group and are in depth, they don't pass the notability guidelines and cannot have an article on Wikipedia. Notability is decided on coverage, not merit. Doing good things can make it more likely that someone or something will gain coverage, but sadly it is not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, WP:A7 articles in general are not restored through here. You can ask the deleting admins, but I think that it would be unlikely that they would restore the page given that it had promotional overtones throughout the article and would (at best) require a complete re-write to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. You could also try going through deletion review (WP:DRV) but I think that they'd probably agree that right now the organization does not appear to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kusumrai Anjaria

I, Rupen.anjaria, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rupen.anjaria (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Knowledge Steez (2nd request)

In my understanding, the page was deleted for wrong reasons. The page depicts the information about a portal that has gained huge popularity in India and is serving as an educational portal too. The page also mentiones its achievements as a non for profit organizations and the different initiatives it has taken to make people aware of their rights in ots best possible capacity. If even this statement of pacts turns out to be advertisement, I believe advertisement and statement of facts would be synonymous then. Kindly make a review and undelete the page. I will be highly grateful for this kindness of yours. -Tej049 (talk) 11:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The page was deleted as being an advertisement. If you cannot see a way to write this without promoting the topic, then I suggest that you leave the topic for someone else to write about. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ramdas Palsule

Pandit Ramdas Palsule is a very familiar name to the worshippers of Hindustani music, being an accomplished soloist as well as a versatile accompanist. Pandit Ramdas Palsule is a very familiar name to the worshippers of Hindustani music as an intellectual Tabla Player who has carved a niche for himself at a very young age. Ramdas has been recognized as one of the senior most disciples of the famous tabla maestro Pandit Suresh Talwalkar. Ramdas-ji being an accomplished soloist as well as a versatile accompanist has performed widely in all the eminent music festivals of India. Outside India, he has performed all over the world including countries like U.S.A., Canada, Germany, Australia, Africa and the Gulf Countries. His Tabla accompaniment ranges from distinguished vocalists to prominent instrumentalists and also to renowned Kathak dancers of the country. He has accompanied many artists, which includes Late Pandit Jeetendra Abhisheki, Pandit Jasraj, Pandit Shivkumar Sharma, Pandit Ulhas Kashalkar, Ustad Shahid Parvez, Ustad Sulatan Khan, Pandit Vishwamohan Bhatt, Pandit Tarun Bhattacharya, Dr. N. Rajam, Pandit Ronu Majoomdar, Mrs. Malini Rajurkar, Mrs. Veena Sahastrbuddhe, Mrs. Rohini Bhate, Mrs. Shama Bhate, and Smt. Shashwati Sen.

I was just adding good information in the article with right references and suddenly the article got deleted. Please Undo the page deletion....I, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted article. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Coolgama (talk) I have been collecting more source material to complete this article. Please let me have what I have already written. Thanks -Coolgama (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate Graeme Bartlett. I would put my best efforts to improve the article.... Coolgama (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terradise

I, Djhaldeman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djhaldeman (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Djhaldeman: I guess you missed my reply here to your request on 9 December, which said that the article has been accepted and is now at Terradise where you are welcome to continue to develop it. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terradise

Still Researching and editing -Djhaldeman (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See above - the article Terradise has not been deleted and is not proposed for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makara vyuha

the reason specified for the page deletion is imaginary and the concept is discussed only in mahabaharata but isnt every religion we know about based on some or other fact that we may tag to be imaginary but that dosent mean the the thing is real or not these vyuhs discussed in mahabaharata are something that we may want to know about just because the formation was discussed only in mahabaharata dosent mean that it is imaginary and we have every right to know it if it is stated in a text as old as mahabaharata -103.226.7.190 (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: - please give the exact title of the deleted page you mean. We have never had an article Makara vyuha, or Makara Vyuha, or any of the variations I have tried. If you don't know the exact title, give the username of the account that created the page. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously guessing is not our job but I always take it as a fun challenge to try to track down what a user might have meant in a cryptic post like this. My stretched guess is Shakatavyuha(Cart Formation) which has "vyuha" as part of it's name, was recently deleted, and mentions mahabaharata in its text.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so, because at Bhishma#Strategic Formations: the Vyuha there are eight vyuhas listed, and that's a different one. I agree, it's a challenge, and that list gives new ideas for searches like Makara vyuha (crocodile formation), but I haven't found anything on those lines, either. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shook (musician)

I, Marcusmiller92, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marcusmiller92 (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcusmiller92: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tracey Whitney

I, TraceyWhitney, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TraceyWhitney (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to read WP:Autobiography before continuing. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@TraceyWhitney: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As Jeremy says, you should read WP:Autobiography, and also WP:MUSICBIO and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lois Weiss

I, Firefly51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Firefly51 (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly51: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:WebPositive

A draft of changes that was created collaboratively for a pre-existing article was deleted by an admin as a duplicate. The deleted draft is requested to be undeleted or preferably merged into the master article (WebPositive). Admin is active on wikipedia, but is not responding to communication -Dlpkbr (talk) 01:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I was going to attend to this myself, but it appears Fuhghettaboutit has already taken care of it. The histories have been merged. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(e/c) Done A history merge has been performed. In the future just make edits directly. This draft was technically a copyright violation by the way (though not the type we nuke on sight). You must provide proper copyright attribution when you copy an existing page (or content from one article into another). See WP:PATT for how to provide attribution. It's much better to make such edits directly. In this case a history merge was not a problem because there was no overlapping edits but when there are, it is a problem, and then we have to just do a merge (which is different than a history merge) and messily requires the merge-from page to remain permanently somewhere because it's history is the source of the merged content (to be clear one person can copy a page to a draft, work on its there, and then if that same person makes their drafted changes to the existing article, and the draft incorporates no changes from other people, there is no copyright issue and no merge is needed).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavna Limbachia

This page is NOT about myself it is about a UK Actress who starts in the UK BBC Comedy Citizen Khan I understand the rules of Wikipedia and have not created a page about myself. I would like to know how you came to this? -Limbachia (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Limbachia: this page is only for requesting restoration of articles that have been deleted, and Bhavna Limbachia has not. To answer your question: all new pages are looked at by volunteer New Page Patrollers in order to filter out advertisements, attack pages, copyright violations etc, and to flag articles that need attention. Your user name naturally suggests that you are the subject of the article, or are related to her. I suggest that you read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and explain on the article talk page what connection you have with the subject, if any. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done The page has since been deleted as a G7 (after you posted this here), but I do note that it was also at AfD so if you do re-create this then you will need to show coverage in reliable sources to prove notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FailCoin

I, 2.222.48.169, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.222.48.169 (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done The draft was a blatant copyright infringement, copying and pasting the text from Failcoin's website (it was also highly inappropriate content for an encyclopedia article).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saccharo

Pearsonbrothers (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Wikipedia has an inclusion criterion called Wikipedia:Notabilitywhich is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary).
I presume that you are Pearson Brothers Winery and this is your new product. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and understand that Wikipedia is not for promotion of any kind.
You will need to ask for a change of username - see note on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volatility Guard undeletion

Discussions ended at a point when the original proposers for article deletion had expressed satisfaction with the edition and direction of the article. -118.209.125.32 (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volatility Guard, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Oakman

unjustifiably deleted. Admin decided to take it into his/her own hands to decide who's notable or not. There were numerous sources provided in the article, that suggest an AFD would be the more logical move than to just flat out delete.-Yankees10 01:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the deleting admin, let me note that Yankees has repeatedly resisted my explanation and reminder that this article didn't have any secondary sources; all he's done is insist that the guy passed WP:BIO, despite providing no evidence for such a statement, let alone evidence of the significance that would ward off an A7 speedy. Note that administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media in a few situations, and this is one of those situations. Nyttend (talk) 01:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yankees10: The page is ineligible for restoration by request because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Because the deleting administrator has already stated the rationale for deleting the page, you may bypass the step required in Wikipedia:Deletion review to contact the deleting administrator, and open a case there. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Titomirov

it is my personal page, I would like to keep it safe"Save page" button below -217.42.228.17 (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia isn't a free web host for personal pages. Also the page was promotional and a copyright violation, and we absolutely will not restore copyvio material. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greek Orthodox Folk Dance & Choral Festival

I, Nhendrickson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nhendrickson (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nhendrickson: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Male' Water and Sewerage Company Pvt. Ltd

I, Naufalu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. To edit the article to resubmit -Naufalu (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Naufalu: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

genodynamics

i think this is a very important topic and this page should not be deleted under the course of speedy deletion if this page needs some change then i will do the changes but should not be deleted altogether -Dr biswas (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The standard for all Wikipedia articles is multiple reliable sources that talk about it and have no connection to the subject or whomever came up with it. We don't regard one person thinking it's important as grounds for inclusion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr biswas:  Not done. As Jeremy says, an encyclopedia is not a place for announcing new ideas. See the fundamental policy Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery." JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California Coalition for Families and Children Family Court Racketeering Litigation

I, Californiacoalition, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Californiacoalition (talk) 07:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to continue development of the page for future submission for approval -Californiacoalition (talk) 07:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia doesn't allow shared accounts or usernames that imply same. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined. @Californiacoalition: Who is "we"? Organizations aren't permitted to have Wikipedia accounts, only individual people can have accounts here. Go to WP:CHU/Simple to request a change of username that complies with Wikipedia:Username policy, and I'll reconsider this request. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hanam Jungwon

I, Pine108, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pine108 (talk) 07:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pine108: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Confused and uninformative title removed)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 172.56.39.64 (talk) 13:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: - IP user, what is the title of the page you want restored? Reply below here. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

REWORK (book)

This article should have been given enough time to be expanded before being considered for deletion. It was treated more like a malicious topic of which it is an important title that should have a page on here. -Sidewinder message me! 15:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sidewinder: checkY Userfied to User:Sidewinder/REWORK (book), though with only two sentences it was hardly worth userfying. We are rather more picky these days about obviously incomplete articles in the mainspace: people are encouraged to use the new Draft namespace or a Userspace draft to develop new articles before posting them. Check out WP:Notability (books), and please check with the deleting adminstrator, RHaworth (talk), before restoring this to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vopop/sandbox

I, Vopop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vopop (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vopop: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Urban Interaction Design

I, Brynskov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hi, the draft is actually still in preparation. Sorry for being slow. It was never submitted, and, thus, never declined. Cheers, Brynskov (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brynskov: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Astro Black

This page was deleted before we were able to add any articles and write up that illustrates Astro's contribution to music and to young marginalized people. Astro does a lot of important work internationally and at home. We would like to be able to let others know about this work. -Wysinger Birds (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Wysinger Birds: Not done Hi Wysinger Birds. None of the issues you mention has any bearing whatever on the reason for the deletion. It is true that we require citations to reliable sources but the lack thereof did not contribute to the deletion basis, which was blatant promotion under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. What you wrote was a commercial – a transparent piece of advocacy, crowing the greatness and virtue of the subject. Writing like that has no place here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mike Knight (boxer)

I, Undefeated123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Undefeated123 (talk) 08:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Undefeated123: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manav Mahapatra

He is A Dubbing Director click the "Save page" button below -siddiqpatel (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddiqpatel: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people - see, in particular, WP:CREATIVE. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwill

its is not promotion or advertising also GREENWILL is a non-profit, global environmental initiative with members in over 60 countries. It provides free Green Policies and Green Guidelines to its members. "Save page" button below -80.98.71.86 (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. One can still promote an initiative, as you're doing above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Meed

I, Johnmeed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Johnmeed (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnmeed: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mario Camilleri (Senior)

I, CharlieTheCabbie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore and move this page to my userspace please, I do intend to work on it but other things have simply taken over on WP. Thanks :) CharlieTheCabbie|paġna utenti|diskussjoni 11:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Orbital

The Orbital is the student publication for Royal Holloway, University of London. The Wikipedia page contained a significant amount of historical information about the publication that's been in existence since 1989. This information is not contained or stored in another central location. For that reason its deletion is a disservice to the philosophy of Wikipedia. Your help restoring this page would be very much appreciated. -194.60.38.25 (talk) 14:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbital, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • On a side note, an organization's existence does not automatically mean that it is notable. Longevity does make it more likely that there will be coverage in reliable sources, but it is not a guarantee. Also, the usefulness of an entry (WP:ITSUSEFUL) is not a reason to keep a page in and of itself. If you do ask for its restoration on the admin's page or on DRV, you will need to provide sources to prove notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LONDON Advertising

I, 31.221.85.250, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. article was declined due to lack of notability and the sources used being unreliable, I would like to restore the article so I can edit it in order to make the article fit the required criteria 31.221.85.250 (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lewis Romano

I, Tee nme, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I wasn't involved with the creation of this article so don't know why it was rejected. Because I have successfully edited a related article (SpotJobs.com) I have been asked to re-write/edit this article. Thank you. Tee (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tee nme: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Roast Records

hi, our image was deleted in June because I did not properly label it but we do indeed own the copyright to the artwork - it would be great if it could be added. I will check to add the proper copyright if it can be readded. Thanks! -Elmurphy9 (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Elmurphy9: Done File:LudwigLogo.jpg has been restored.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bioasis Technologies Inc

I, 142.103.207.10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 142.103.207.10 (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of this and this and this and others. It was also so brazenly promotional that even as a draft, where we usually give some more leeway, it would properly have been deleted on sight.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/CFE_Federal_Credit_Union

I, 208.95.168.50, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 208.95.168.50 (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of this and this if not others (it was also brazenly promotional).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Schwalb

Page, entirely verified via major publications (NY Times, Sports Illustrated, Wall Street Journal) has existed for at least 6 years and was deleted by antagonist with a "personal issue" without bona fide reason -24.227.126.2 (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article has a long history with copyright violations, which is why it was deleted for the third time. In fact I've permanently salted it to prevent that from happening again. If the subject is truly notable then please create a draft via Articles for Creation so it can be checked before going live. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Princess Clark-Wendel

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -71.62.105.84 (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bicycle Alliance of Washington

I, BarbChamberlain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BarbChamberlain (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BarbChamberlain: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very Extreme Hacking

This article will be usefull to people and its not like promotional So Please restore my content i need to work on it -Jason Springfield (talk) 05:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Even if the promotional concerns are resolved I can't see where this particular term would ultimately pass notability guidelines. Being useful isn't a reason to keep/have an article on Wikipedia (WP:ITSUSEFUL) and you'd have to show where this term and the linked website would pass notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Carsten K. Rath

I, 37.34.74.173, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 37.34.74.173 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Southhindimovies:Manav Mahapatra

I, Southhindimovies, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -siddiqpatel (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) siddiqpatel (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would also like to warn you that your username implies that you are involved with the person or a specific corporation. It's not so bad that I'll block you, but I would recommend a username change. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marcus de Maria

I, Willr21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Willr21 (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ebin George

I, Rajeevsujas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rajeevsujas (talk) 10:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) I want to modify the article as this person has more notability now -Rajeevsujas (talk) 10:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done I was going to restore this, but the issue I have is that there are several areas that are written in such a non-neutral point of view that they come across as promotional. I'd recommend against having an entire section talking about George's spirituality and how he wants to serve God, as something like that should only be a brief mention unless George's spirituality has been extensively covered in reliable sources independent of George. The same thing goes for the long sections about his personal background and upbringing: stuff like that should be summarized and really only covered in any depth if it is extensively covered in independent reliable sources (WP:RS). I'd also recommend avoiding headings like "NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE - Performance for the World Record" because those also come across as promotional in tone. Even if you do add more sources to show notability the article would still require a complete and total re-write to fit Wikipedia's WP:NPOV guidelines. I'd also like to give a slight warning: world records don't always grant complete notability- sometimes they can if they are widely covered enough or recognized by an organization that is trusted by Wikipedia, but the whole reliability thing is key- there are sadly a lot of places that will claim to recognize you for a world record but it's really just about putting money in their pocket. (The Guinness Book of World Records has come under fire for this as of late.) I also have to say that I'm somewhat concerned about his notability as a whole since I don't really see any true coverage in a quick search, but I have no problem with you trying to create a new AfC entry. I'm just skeptical that the guy would ultimately pass the admittedly very strict notability guidelines on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cultivated Indian English

I do not want it to be deleted because some Indians do use this way of speech -202.142.115.70 (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has not been deleted: deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Cultivated Indian English and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The article cites no references: these are necessary (a) because of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) because Wikipedia has an inclusion test called Wikipedia:Notability which looks for evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Animesh Tarodia

The page is on a great personality of Badnagar so I request you to undelete it.Please restore my page I want to work on it-Tarodiaa (talk) 12:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Hi Tarodiaa. This will not be restored. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Your profile does not belong on Wikipedia at all, just like mine doesn't. Wikipedia only has articles on topics the world has written about. Since you aren't the subject of newspaper articles and sources like that, this page had no place here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paraytec

I, 217.40.44.169, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 217.40.44.169 (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Animesh Tarodia

This page should be restored because Animesh Tarodia is a great personality of Badnagar,Madhya Pradesh,India.And one more thing I had to work on it.. -Tarodiaa (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarodiaa: Not done and will not be done - see above. You wrote that you "can be founded in every social networking site", but Wikipedia isn't a social networking site, it's an encyclopedia, and that's why it's not a place for you to write about yourself. You should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa Psi Epsilon

In addressing the reasons stated for deletion, the significance of the organization Kappa Psi Epsilon is it's standing on the Rutgers University Newark Campus as the oldest, still recognized, sorority on campus. Technically speaking, because the other two Rutgers campuses don't have recognized local sororities, it is the only remanding local sorority in the Rutgers University community. This can be verified through the 'Greek Life' pages of all three campuses. In addition, other Universities have their local organizations listed, with less significance such as Sigma Delta from Darthmoth College. It can also be reworded to address the issues of seeming "promotional." -Aissalated (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irving Wohlfarth

212.194.190.114 (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics

I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aberleant (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics

I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aberleant (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:200.104.240.11/Harassment

Deleted with the false claim that it was an attack page. In fact, it was a record of a sustained campaign of harassment against me. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC) -200.83.101.225 (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=641254642"