Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DocterCox (talk | contribs) at 23:42, 29 July 2014 (→‎Heaven Sent Gaming: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Copy of User:Leisure Pirate

Hello, I am requesting a copy of my recently-deleted user page as it went against Wikipedia's No Web Host rules. I simply want to copy the content I posted there- a dozen or so infoboxes I made for personal use, and put them elsewhere as required, probably my Sandbox. I'd be grateful for any assistance given, and I apologize for not abiding by one of the site's rules.

Many Thanks. -Leisure Pirate (talk) 23:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Sorry, but I can't see what purpose restoring this would serve. Not only that, but a look at the information in the data boxes also shows that aside from the WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns, there's also a bit of vandalism there. I can't see what possible positive use it would be when you link the Adriatic Pact to cumshot. The only possible use I can see is for vandalism purposes and not only is that not allowable on Wikipedia, but it can actually lead to your account getting permanently blocked from editing. Your best bet here is to just accept that the material has been deleted and edit in a beneficial manner from here on out. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even if this was going to be posted on an outside source, it is still inappropriate for you to create hoax/vandalism infoboxes in any context. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tokyogirl79: I wouldn't be so harsh. The user's edit history does not show any sign of such vandalism, and the page itself really looks playful more than harmful from what I remember. Imagining virtual polities with different political regimes than historical ones is really a benign game, as is playing with wiki syntax. I'm the one who first notified the user that this did not fit user pages policies, and they acknowledged it immediately. I'd say let the kid have his toy back and play elsewhere, as he politely requested. All signs show this could be a future constructive contributor to Wikipedia, there's no use being too iron-handed here imho. Place Clichy (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I for one can't see why it was deleted in the first place. I see that some of the templates included the user page into mainspace categories and that's how another user noticed the page itself, but other than that annoyance what's the problem? That a userpage has some templates and what-not which would've otherwise gone unnoticed until the end of time? @Leisure Pirate, to you have email enabled? If so, I'll just email you a copy of the page. The better path for all involved would've been to fix the transclusion/category issue and ignore the page. And @Tokyogirl79, don't you think "Your best bet here is to just accept that the material has been deleted and edit in a beneficial manner from here on out" is a bit extreme given the situation? They futzed around with their user page, they weren't generating hoaxes or vandalizing articles. Is this how we treat people who break a rule (under a broad interpretation, IMO) they probably didn't know existed? Protonk (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, but I can see no good reason for someone to have a userbox created in that manner. The problem is that it's not that they did this once, but several times in the infoboxes. The infobox would show up as linking to various historical events, but would actually be linking to things such as the following: "fail, cumshot, anus, bum, cock, poo, willy" and so on. Why create that? Why create it at all? By most standards that'd be seen as vandalism. I didn't block him because there wasn't really a history of vandalism, but I can't see where he'd really be able to use that in any beneficial manner anywhere on Wikipedia or elsewhere. Maybe he didn't outright state that he was going to try to insert it into one of the articles here on Wikipedia, but it's hard to imagine that this would be used for anything other than vandalism somewhere. We've deleted stuff like this as vandalism and declined to restore them for less than this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm aware of the content of the page. I'm also aware it's a user page, literally the least important and least restricted set of pages on the wiki. And apart from a relatively narrow set of restrictions (which the page didn't really violate, if it was User:Leisure Pirate/Template testing nobody would've batted an eye), we shouldn't waste time policing userspace for venial sins. I wasn't convinced it violated NOTWEB and I'm even less convinced that the user is guilty of vandalism pre-crime. Obviously there's room for disagreement, but imagine that Leisure Pirate just wanted to play with templates. Someone came by and deleted their user page and in asking to have the content restored they were treated like a petulant child who broke a rule and needed to know why they were bad instead of an adult who didn't know we had these rules. If we assume LP is editing in good faith, that's a pretty awful introduction into the community. Protonk (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • More to the point, if you're right and LP was building up these templates in preparation for a spree of hoax edits to european countries, we can just revert the eventual edits to mainspace and block the account. Nothing is really lost by restoring the content and nothing is gained by keeping it deleted (with 570 some edits to infoboxes I bet they've got the hang of it). If they're merely experimenting with templates and linking to fail/cumshot/etc. because it's more fun than not, then all we've accomplished by asserting they're a vandal in training is piss off a member of the community. In the future when someone brings up Wikipedia in conversation, their experience will be "I broke some obscure rule, then got yelled at for making a contrite request to have my page restored." Protonk (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • I agree. If @Tokyogirl79: does not object, I will restore the content to a sub-page of the user's space. I will refrain from trouting, much as I am tempted. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you promise to watch it like a hawk, go ahead. I just see it as something that'd be inevitably used for trolling. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rodolph (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC) copyright is ok Photograph is in a family album. I made a digital photograph copy of the 1929 image and gave it to Wikipedia. The house belonged to my great-grandfather. My father was the only son of his eldest surviving son. [Rodolph de Salis] (appointed representative of what was the Dawley estate/exors. of Cecil Fane de Salis, etc.)] [07 July 2014][reply]

  •  Not done the photographer is still unknown, also since Wikipedia is the first publication, a suitable license will have to be granted. You could do it CC-0 or attempt to release all rights in the US (public domain) but as per the deletion discussion it does not qualify by itself to be public domain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
it was published, public published, made public, in 1929, so Wikipedia is not the first publication.Rodolph2 (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
anonymous, unknown, enough years have passed for an unknown work to become public. Anyway there is a high chance that it was taken, made, published, by my great-grandparents, ergo rights, estate photo rights, passed dwon and released.00:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Where was it published in 1929? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black_Heart,_photo_from_CoS,_Sep_2013.jpg

I, Skylar3214, request undeletion for the file I uploaded for Black Heart (Stone Temple Pilots song) of the Articles for Creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please note that I uploaded a file for "Black Heart" by Stone Temple Pilots, and it also came from a source that was posted on the CoS website by Michael Roffman. I've worked on the article just until at 23:41, 21 July 2014. Skylar3214 7:29, 21 July 2014

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. The file is nominated for deletion and is an issue for multiple reasons. 1) The CD cover's copyright has not been released by its owner into the public domain. If it has been release, (which would be one of the first times in the music industry) we have no evidence. 2) The file could be kept as fair-use, but it has no fair-use rationale nor the appropriate copyright tag. And the file would need to be reduced in resolution. To be kept, these things will have to be done to the file. (Basically, the file description page should look like File:Out of Time, photo from Google Play, July 2014.jpg, the file you uploaded just before. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now I saw where you were at with this. I've done the same thing, like I did for the last one I uploaded for Out of Time (Stone Temple Pilots song). Skylar3214 9:37, 21 July 2014
Good job @Skylar3214:, everything looks good now! TLSuda (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bodybagstyle Productions

The article wasn't completed yet, I saved the article so I wouldn't lose its content. It was deleted because of notable significance. Bodybagstle Productions is using technology infused in their music to create a binaural audio effect. More research is being done, but the page was deleted before it was complete. If there is any way I can keep that page while it is being edited, I can prove why it is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D420world (talk • contribs)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. That said, admins could probably move it into a userspace draft for you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dwight Shellman

I, Sharrson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. skh 04:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Powermaster

I, Sheerine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sheerine (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC) , ==[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World Class Arena

World Class Arena is an initiative devised by British Government Department of Education in 2000. It aim to assess gifted and talented children among 8-11 year olds.

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Class Tests

I, 103.26.123.222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World Class Tests

The article is useful for public -103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heiko Bleher

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -93.147.180.185 (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Dear Sirs,[reply]

I always supported, respected and used Wikipedia to inform our many contributors to your site, also on our www.aquapress-bleher.com and www.aqua-aquapress.com websites, but I just came aware that some one, for no reason I can see – WHATSOEVER – has deleted my profile page HEIKO BLEHER (there is only one in the world with this name) completely.

You state that there it has been deleted because of a copyright infringement, which is impossible, as there is none. This texts were inserted by someone who knows my life and what I have done 100% and I never saw any infringement whatsoever. Everything stated was 100% correct and in no case any violation to any copyright. You can also see this on the websites above mentioned and elsewhere on the www (ir Goggle).

I expect a immediate answer how such a thing could happen. I can only imagine, that some jealous people (jealous of my life-time work) have eliminated it, as there is nothing of an copyright infringement on my site.

Thank you in advance and see foreword to you soon answer and re-in-statement of that page,

Sincerely Heiko Bleher President of Aquapress Publishers Italy

New Jagannath Sadak

Its not a promotion page , its a map page giving information on the road and then click the "Save page" button below -Newjagannathsadak (talk) 10:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done I have restored this to Draft:New Jagannath Sadak and removed the promotional facebook bit. Facebook is not a suitable source. By having a username the same as the page you were writing makes it also sound promotional. Anyway work on the draft, find the additional citations, and please consult me or User talk: Seraphimblade before moving this back as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tam Goossen

No reason for the page to be deleted -she is a prominent community member in Toronto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.113.230.3 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The reason (no importance asserted) was valid, although of course the subject might meet the notability guidelines. That said, the deletion was in 2006 and the article was completely unsourced, so either way it would qualify for a deletion as an unsourced biography. I'd recommend just recreating it, again if they meet the notability guidelines. If you are associated with the subject in any way this is required reading as well. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Shaoolian

I, 24.189.138.232, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.189.138.232 (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Socks

I, Ilea79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I need the text I created in order to change it! And I also need the info I had added for a diffrent purpose within our company.Ilea79 (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilea79: When you say within our company, are you associated with Happy Socks? If so, have you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest?--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick:Not within Happy Socks, within the company I work for.

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Ilea79: --S Philbrick(Talk) 17:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The PyppöMærdah

The PyppöMærdah is an experimental music band active from 2009 to 2012 in Sardinia. We have tracks on Youtube to prove it -Bandos11 (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orthotropics®

Dear admins, I am writing regarding the undeletion of our wikipedia page about Orthotropics®. Orthotropics® is a treatment developed over 40 years ago by Prof. John Mew. (http://orthotropics.org/Education_and_Events/indexf.php?ACT=History_of_Orthotropics_Education )This treatment basically aims to correct the facial development and teeth alignment together with improving the facial growth (http://www.facefocused.com/bioorthotrop.html) This treatment prevents unnecessary dental extraction and major surgeries (http://www.lsfo.co.uk/orthotropics) There are three Orthotropics organizations including International Association - http://www.orthotropics.com,North American Association - http://www.orthotropics-na.org and Asian association- http://www.orthotropicsasia.com and over 100 Orthotropics Practitioners worldwide http://www.orthotropics.org/Discover_Orthotropics/find-an-orthotropist & http://www.orthotropics-na.org/public/NAAFO_Find_A_Member_Map.cfm , There are also a number of published articles in the peer reviewed Dental and Orthodontic journals about Orthotropics treatment including: 1. Mew JRC. 1999. A New form of Orthodontic Treatment Tested on Identical Twins. European Journal of Orthodontics. 21: 605. 2. Mew, J.R.C. “Facial form, head posture, and the protection of the pharyngeal space” The clinical alteration of the growing face. J.A.Macnamara, K.Ribbens, R.P.Howe. Eds. Monograph 14. Crainiofacial Growth Series. Center of Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor. Michigan. 1983. (see also papers published by John Mew)

3. Mew, J.R.C. “Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopedics. 104: 105-120. 1993Faces 1993. (see also papers published by John Mew)

4. Mew J R C. 2004. The Postural Basis of Malocclusion: A philosophical Overview. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. In press July or August. Finally I would like to request undeletion of this page as a it is a helpful reference for parents and practitioners considering an alternative non-extraction treatment.

Kind regards, Kian Morteza Fazeli Niaki, DMD, MClin Pros - Academic director of London School of Facial Orthotropics -86.149.175.233 (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. First, let me make clear that, although originally written by Prof Mew, this was not your article, it was Wikipedia's article. Wikipedia is not a "notice-board" site like Facebook for people to tell the world about their own concerns or inventions, and is extremely resistant to being used for any kind of promotion. As you are concerned with "Orthrotropics", you should read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
The article was the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orthotropics®, although that was cut short when it was speedily deleted as an advertisement. If you disagree, you should first apprach the deleting administrator, user Orangemike (talk); then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can make a request at WP:Deletion review.
Most, if not all, of the references you cite seem to be by Prof Mew, or from sources connected with the Orthotropics movement. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, known as WP:Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NiCE IT Management Solutions

Enter your reasoning here Hi I would like to contest the deletion of the NiCE IT Management Solutions page because Wikipedia already has many company profiles and this company profile is no different. It was written in the same way that the Coca-Cola or Accenture pages were written for example, where they talk about the history of the company and the products/services that it offers. The NiCE IT Management Solutions page is no different. It's just a smaller company but the content therein is similar. Why not delete the Coca-Cola and Accenture pages too then? -Nonthando (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done I was going to leave the standard response regarding non-notable businesses, but your wording shows that you have some fundamental misunderstandings. First, there is no such thing as a "company profile" on Wikipedia - we have encyclopedia articles about notable topics. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it is instead an encyclopedia that includes only notable businesses. Surely you're not compating NiCE IT to Coca-Cola or Accenture in terms of notability? There are billions of businesses in the world, but less than 1% of them will ever meet the notability requirements, and that's intentional. the panda ₯’ 09:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Green coast

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gimicom (talk) 12:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) green coast is a seaside coast in the south of Albania, in the Palasa village. it is not a company. it is a geographic position. in Albanian is Bregu i Gjelbert (like cape verde).[reply]

Green coast is not an company. green coast is called the beach near palasa beach in Albania. green coast in Albanian is bregu i gjelbert and is one of the most beautiful beaches in the Albanian riviera. what is here wrong that should be deleted? at leas some information why someone deleted it? sounds very strange to me. please undelete this article so I can work on it with the references. -Gimicom (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This article would need a complete re-write, because it was written in wildly promotional language: "an oasis of calm... offers a host of activities... a land to be loved... warm hospitality... clean and pristine beaches, spectacular mountains, scenic river valleys... a truly unique blend of Mediterranean flavors... " etc, etc. That is not an encyclopedia article, it is a tourist-office brochure, full of "peacock terms" and written to "sell" the area and encourage visitors. Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. We require a neutral point of view, no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts, neutrally stated and backed up by reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your statement but I think it is a bit immature to delete it and not giving some time for editions. it was canceled in just a second right after the publishing. give to people some time to improve. Unedelete it so I can work on it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.71.201 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried creating a draft in WP:Articles for creation yet? An AfC draft is generally safe from most forms of speedy deletion compared to just putting it in mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's good advice, with the proviso that anything as promotional as what you wrote will be speedily-deleted at sight even in draft or AfC space. For that reason, I will not restore the article - you need to start from a clean sheet and a completely different point of view. Think of yourself not as a tourist-office copywriter trying to attract customers, or an enthusiast encouraging other people to come and share your passion, but as a geographer or an intelligence officer reporting on the area. The reader should have no idea whether you personally think the Green Coast is good or bad. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and then use the WP:Article Wizard to help you. JohnCD (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Don M. Winn

I, Sylviamerrick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sylviamerrick (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Armchair Committee

I, Matthewreading, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Matthewreading (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthewreading: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NetBrain Technologies, Inc

I submitted article for review and it mentioned 916 articles were ahead of me, it would seem quite impossible that on the same day after submitting my hard work would be deleted so promptly, when after submitting it mentioned that it would take over a week or more for review...please put article back into sandbox. I thought submitting an article would also mean getting help to correct any issues 'wiki' has, not tigger happy moderators waiting to delete people's hard work. Very unprofessional! thank you very much. -Turner Paige (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Turner Paige: Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Turner Paige/NetBrain Technologies, Inc. There is some misunderstanding. Any article part of the Articles for Creation (AfC) process should not be deleted immediately (except for copyright violation and some other rare situations), but I do not see that this was developed through the AfC process. It was developed in Main space, and articles in that space can be speedily deleted. I glanced at it and it is not close to ready, but I have userfied it so you can work on it and submit it for review.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Joseph Collins

I, 74.138.110.114, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.138.110.114 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @74.138.110.114: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech

I, Jayccooper, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jayccooper (talk) 20:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayccooper (talk • contribs) 21:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (already done, just noting it here) --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bheems Ceciroleo

please do not delete this article he is new music director and i am still adding info and giving reference too -Chandooo (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelsey Lee

I have always refered information to reliable sources and will do so again. I added a reference to watchxhit.com, and, originally, Lee's pages (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter). I know YT, FB, and Twitter aren't reliable sources, but I only included those as Lee's pages. XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC) -XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shreekumar Vakkiyil

I, NitashaPinjani, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NitashaPinjani (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @NitashaPinjani: --S Philbrick(Talk) 17:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Kojack Kojackton

Before deleting my page you should tell where to correct myself instead of just deleting it. Let me know where I went wrong so that I can make corrections. Wikipedia should be able to give me a guideline how to make things right. Since I have not offended anyone or made any bad remarks you should be able to guide me.

I wait for your guidance!

Kind regards,

Andrew Kojack Kojackton -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.202.240.12 (talk) 05:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. It is definitely our standard practice to provide an explanation, so if that did not happen, I want to see why. However, I cannot find the article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've found it - it was a user page, User:ANDREW KOJACK KOJACKTON, and you were notified on your talk page here.
Mr Kojackton, I'm sorry that we don't make this clearer to new users at sign-up time, but Wikipedia is not another site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to tell the world about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, and user pages are for the users, who are here to help build the encyclopedia, to say something about themselves and their Wikipedia work, to assist communication within the project. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haden Freeman

The page was created by the company Haden Freeman and was not meant to be an advertisement. The text was copied from the website to ensure everything followed the house style. Instead, we will give a summary of the company and will list the awards and memberships the company holds as well as a brief history. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.199.228.194 (talk) 08:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done There are two issues: number one, this is an encyclopedia, not a business directory - the company you wrote about does not meet the strict notability requirements for an article. Second, copy/paste from a website is a WP:COPYRIGHT violation, and can never be accepted, let alone undeleted. the panda ₯’ 08:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Phoniker/Frido Ruth

I, Phoniker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phoniker (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Phoniker:Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khaleel Abdul-Jaleel

I, Broadus-YRR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Broadus-YRR (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Broadus-YRR:Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Customer_Service_System

The administrator deleted this citing several poor reasons such as "try listing on Craigslist instead". The administrator is now no longer part of Wikipedia. This article gave good information about BT CSS, a mainframe system that runs BT Wholesales infrastructure. It is a good example of a computer mainframe system that was important for business. Instead it was deleted for being a "blatant advert". -195.95.131.65 (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@195.95.131.65: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It is a blatant advert, but you are welcome to make it acceptable.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Corner

It is a new article being translated and the game is popular in most regions of China. -杨肇峰 (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: A similar article, with the same illustration, was deleted (or rather, turned into a redirect) in 2009 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Corner. I have not time tonight to compare the articles in detail. I will do that tomorrow (unless any other admin likes to decide what to do). JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The article is sufficiently changed from the earlier one that I think the best course is to restore it and re-nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion to let the community decide. I will wait a week before I do that, to give you some time to improve it. In particular, you need better references to establish WP:Notability, and you need to update the dead links. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International Spiritist Council

The reason listed for deletion was: "Notability of this organization is not established. Apparent COI edits by User:Ssbaltimore". The International Spiritist Council exists: http://cei.spirite.org/ . It's site is mainly in portuguese. -177.135.231.5 (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. It does not matter that the website is in Portuguese, but for a Wikipedia article it is not enough that the organization exists and has a website: the test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter W. Marty

I, 65.101.95.64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.101.95.64 (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @65.101.95.64: --S Philbrick(Talk) 19:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emerge Financial Wellness

I, 173.14.111.110, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.14.111.110 (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mato Homola

I, OndrejC2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dear Wiki admins, I have completely forgot to finish this article, it would be great if you could retrieve it for me. Thanks a lot. Ondrej OndrejC2 (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arman Mkrtchyan

I, Aaaaa2300, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aaaaa2300 (talk) 00:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Aaaaa2300: --S Philbrick(Talk) 01:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glass Wave

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Arms & Hearts: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I would agree with the IP's proposed deletion rationale, so I hope you fix the article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Panther (watercar)

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. @Arms & Hearts: It needs a lot of work and probably qualifies as a speedy deletion at the moment, Consider requesting that it be moved to a user subpage or the Draft user space.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mount of Delta

Mount of Delta is Owned by Prince Ned Munir Nwoko, He added the name Munir recently when he got converted from Christianity to Islam. His name was mentioned on Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi's page here on Wiki because he lost to Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi in Delta State Nigeria. I am not related to him. I went to visit the mount and loved it, i felt i should let the world know too. I'm new to wiki and i am ready to learn -Listen2star (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:. @Listen2star:, this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Mount of Delta, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Your first article first. JohnCD (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cab 20

Enter your I don't understand why this page was suddenly deleted. I was simply providing information on a band that recently became known. The significance of the group was many things from the appearing on the show shark tank, their style, and indie sound. The page was also said to have been deleted because of advertising reasons, when all of the articles were unbiased. The page may have been missing references and citations but this is my first shot at creating a wikipedia page and i was learning as i was creating the page. I chose the smaller band of Cab 20 as my first article to work on to introduce myself to the Wikipedia because they are not globally known or massivly critically acclaimed, so it was not like i was messing with George WAshington's page. They are known which is the reason for them having an article but the are small enough that it is approachable for a first time user to edit the articles and add information. I did make sure to check all information provided such as names, times, locations, titles, and people involved. I do have all of their albums and have read numerous interviews before adding information. Please let me know if the reason's above are not reasons for adding to the wiki and if new users are even really allowed the ability to add new pages. here and then click the "Save page" button below -BlakeInDisguise (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G11. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We also can't restore A7s on request for similar reasons. Have you tried going through WP:Articles for creation as opposed to just writing an article from scratch in mainspace? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nizar typeface

Article contains general information and why they were deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sultanmaqtari (talk • contribs) 04:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. @Sultanmaqtari: Wikipedia is not the place to tell the world about your newly-designed typeface - see WP:No original research and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You may find some ideas at WP:Alternative outlets. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/euRathlon

I, 164.11.203.58, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 164.11.203.58 (talk) 09:44, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • {{ping|164.11.203.58} Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Fazio Sr.

I, Brianchristner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brianchristner (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Brianchristner: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:30, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Fazio Sr.

More Published articles about Jim Fazio Sr. are available to document his career as one of the top golf course designers in the world -Brianchristner (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. (but see section above) --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:30, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ulterius Technologies

It's a very neutral company bio, just brief and reserving the page to add more later. -Memally (talk) 14:42, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I will give it another shot that better respects the guidelines as set by the Wikipedia community sometime over the next two weeks. If you have any added advice, I welcome it. Right now we are referenced on journals externally, and patents, charter etc.

sayaka katsuki

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -90.148.254.251 (talk) 15:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you try all reasonable forms of capitalisation (incl. allcaps)? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done - it was Sayaka Katsuke (link above updated), and was deleted as a copyright violation, and also as promotional. Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted text, even temporarily, unless a formal copyright release is made, and that is seldom worth doing because copying from a Facebook page is unlikely to make a satisfactory encyclopedia article. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lynda Elimon

I, Naight, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Naight (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The submission was deleted because I didn't work on it for 6 months. Now, Ms Elimon who has agreed to edit the submission herself; if it can be restored, she will provide information I didn't have when I tried to do the article. -Naight (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment @Naight: Per WP:Auto she should not be editing it. If that is the only reason for the request, it should not be done. If you plan on working on it yourself, it can be done.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Appy Pie Inc

I, Cxs107, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cxs107 (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Cxs107: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 19:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Athili Venkata Koteshwara Prasanth Babu

I wish to have the article undeleted because he is the person who is responsible for a company as a Chairman and making a debut film with an experience in film making. I am trying to improve the quality of information by collecting as much as possible with references. I can let you know the reasons if any specific questions raised in favor of deletion. If my reasons are not satisfiable then you have your freedom to delete the page. -Cravihere (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fascination_location_2014.jpg

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wizzywikky (talk) 22:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo. Please undelete it.

@Wizzywikky: We need to know what license you release the image under. See WP:ICTIC. Many editors go with CC-by-SA-3.0 or PD-self, but as the work is yours, you choose the license to release it under. Once you give us a license, we can restore the image with the license you choose. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for replying @TLSuda:. I'll go with CC thanks. (I'm not really bothered though.)

januarytonight

I'm not sure if it is my laptop's fault or not, but I am new to Wikipedia and after editing a few pages I have found that I can no longer access my account, which is titled "januarytonight." I was notified after my third edit that one of my edits was deleted, but I was confused as to why. My first and fourth edits are still in place, but whenever I click on my account at the top it tells me the page "Januarytonight" does not exist. I am worried I sourced my fourth edit wrong (I left the source as a single link) and that is what triggered the deletion of my account. At least I believe it has been deleted. I'm truly sorry for immediately editing material without reading into the guidelines, and I will do so promptly. Is there any way my account can be undeleted, if it has been deleted in the first place? -Januarytonight (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Januarytonight: don't worry, your account has not been deleted. Your user page User:Januarytonight doesn't exist, only because you haven't yet put anything there. That page is available for you to say something about yourself and your Wikipedia activities, if you choose, to help communication within the project, but it's up to you. See WP:User pages for more detail. Some more advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/hoccomocco pictures

I, WilliamPollock, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WilliamPollock (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @WilliamPollock: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 11:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Slugga

I, MariuszWolfe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MariuszWolfe (talk) 05:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MariuszWolfe: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:MUSICBIO for the relevant WP:Notability standard. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Encho Jude Ejob

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Encho Brown (talk) 10:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. You are not an international footballer - this was a silly hoax, copied from Neymar with the names changed. In any case, Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catherine Miller

I, Katkins indiana, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Katkins indiana (talk) 15:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Katkins indiana: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sporadic late onset nemaline myopathy

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) EdirolUA25 (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Arkansas

The Southwest area of Arkansas is referenced in many existing Wikipedia articles. Outside Wiki, it is referenced by various government agencies and private organizations. -PGWatson (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? Also, please do not wikkilink the article name inside the template; the template does that by default. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - no, I can't find any trace of such an article either, in AfC space, draft space, anywhere. You will have to tell us the exact title of the deleted page you mean, or the name of the account that created it. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WCWC Legacy Championship

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JeffAkin (talk) 02:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was deleted under A&, belief it was about an event, etc. It is about a championship that is tied to s msjor, independent wrestling promotion. Not an event, but part of a regionally televised program.

 Not done - this does not seem to be notable enough (see WP:Notability (summary)0 to warrant a stand-alons article. It has been redirected to the main West Coast Wrestling Connection where it can be described. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Red Door Casino Online

Could you please explain why the page was deleted I provided content and references as I was building page and recieved first notice before it was finished then I finished page page and now I cannot find the info I provided or coould even save to update all that coding is now gone -Mar Vance (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because it fails our notability requirements for businesses, and is thus ineligible to be in an encyclopedia the panda ₯’ 00:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Mar Vance: Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mar Vance/The Red Door Casino Online. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Bbb23 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Special K Software

I, 72.37.171.196, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 72.37.171.196 (talk) 00:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This was restored last December after a similar request, but was then left untouched. I will restore it again only if you give a definite assurance that this time you do actually intend to work on it. JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nanowar of Steel

I can understand why this article was deleted in 2008. But six years later, the band has 3 albums. They have gained a fair amount of notability worldwide among metal fans. The article has 8 interwikis, each having a few references in their own language. Here are some references.

@Dodoïste: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please update it with references to show how they now meet WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ! I'll do my best (I'm not a native english speaker and I'm usually editing fr.wiki). Dodoïste (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

groot drakenstein games club

Groot Drakenstein may be a games club, but it has a significant history as a club, having the oldest turf wicket in South Africa. It was a club started by the expats of England for the local farmers to play against touring teams. This club has a strong and rich tradition and history, and while still being a sports club, it has had some of the greatest cricketers touring South Africa come and play there. As well as play a pivitol role in the social welfare of the area by starting projects to help previously disadvanteged children in the sport of cricket. Over and above that, Nelson Mandela, when let out of Victor Verster Prison asked to be driven past the ground specifically because he had heard of its rich tradition and history. -196.212.25.98 (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beer in Edinburgh

I, Jimmy jamesk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jimmy jamesk (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Can i have the Beer in Edinburgh undeleted please? I want to fix it to get it onto wikipedia. Thanks Jimmy

  • @Jimmy jamesk: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute

I, 129.93.64.8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 129.93.64.8 (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Emmet Yngson

I,JeanGan , request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. I don't understand.. it says FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA.. why are you need to delete it? this wikipedia is only for an actor or some kind of famous people? please give me a reason so that i can understand.. -JeanGan (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's ONLY for articles about notable people. the panda ₯’ 18:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Popi Marden: Abstract Artist

I am collecting contributors before re-submission and they are very slow with their contributions but this is a great man worth the time to create a great article of historical proportions... please have 6 months more of patience for Bruce "Popi" Marden... thank you -209.179.72.54 (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nanowar of steel.jpg

Following the restoration of the article Nanowar of Steel this monday morning, I request the restoration of its unfree logo. Thanks, Dodoïste (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC) -Dodoïste (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Newbrough

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Friedamay91 (talk) 05:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Ashley Newbrough is a working actress. In 2013- 2014 Ashley recurred on ABC's summer guilty pleasure Mistresses as Kyra, Harry's (Brett Tucker ) fun loving young girlfriend. Ashley was a leading actress, Sage Baker, in the critically acclaimed CW Privileged with her costars Lucy Hale and Joanna Garcia.[reply]

Lulahiinthesky is her Instagam/twitter

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abhaya_Kshethram

I need this article back to live. Since article is about a famous NGO in india, which also got awards from APJ Abdul Kalam, Former President of India -Heykarthikwithu (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Yunshui (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. GB fan 13:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SHIM

I, Matanys, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Matanys (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. GB fan 12:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

numeer nabi

article has notability sources and has enough refrences and plus addition of improvement tag has been added "Save page" button below -Artistcare12 (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. It was proposed for deletion, but you removed the PROD template, as you were quite entitled to do. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: That "article" is in extremely poor shape, and should not be in live articlespace until extensive editing to bring it to even the most basic standards. It's not delete yet (it's a BLPPROD) so there's nothing to undelete, and your "attempt" to make it compliant by adding imdb as a source is unfortunately incorrect. I'd be willing to move it to your userspace or to articles for creation before it does get deleted. the panda ₯’ 13:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Holt

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ianholtwriter (talk) 15:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done What little content there was there is inappropriate for a biography. If you wish to write an article about yourself, please use Articles for creation. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esmond Shahonya

this article is authentic bio of esmond shahonya -Karlmarx776 (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmond Shahonya, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Afro-Eurasia-America

This article should be I deleted to discuss information on Afro-Eurasia before the Bering Strait disappeared. as such I recommend the resurrection of this fine article in order to achieve this, for such to happen in the year of our lord two thousand and fourteen. May Christ be with you -Pablothepenguin (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The article was deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afro-Eurasia-America. Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and is not not the place to try to publish theories or original research. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Juan Rosa Blanco-Cartagena

I, Alcapurrias, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alcapurrias (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Alcapurrias: You will need a lot more sourcing than what you have there. Personal recollections are not sufficient for verification purposes. Also see WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BIO. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Federation of Writers (Scotland)

I, 86.149.226.166, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.149.226.166 (talk) 19:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done There is nothing to restore really, it's a paragraph and then a "see also" link to the organization's website. Which is obviously not enough for an article. You're better off just starting from scratch. Please review the notability guidelines before you do. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean G. Smith

I, Secretphilosophy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Secretphilosophy (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven Sent Gaming

The page was apparently deleted due to overref, advertisement, passing mention references, and notability issues, I did not take part in the original deletion discussions, but I would like to salvage the content of the article. I would like it restored and moved to my user-space so it can be fixed. I would also like to know what steps I would need to go through, after the article is up to code. Do I go to DRV afterward, for them to see when its ready? -DocterCox (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=619047509"