Jump to content

Bofors scandal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk | contribs) at 10:18, 16 January 2021 (Restored revision 1000715888 by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (Restorer)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Haubits FH77 howitzer, of the type around which the Bofors scandal centered.

The Bofors scandal was a major weapons-contract political scandal that occurred between India and Sweden during the 1980s and 1990s, initiated by Indian National Congress politicians and implicating the Indian prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi, and several other members of the Indian and Swedish governments who were accused of receiving kickbacks from Bofors AB, a bank principally financed by the Wallenberg family's Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken,[1] for winning a bid to supply to India their 155 mm field howitzer.[2] The scandal relates to illegal kickbacks paid in a US$1.4-billion deal between the Swedish arms manufacturer Bofors with the government of India for the sale of 410 field howitzer guns, and a supply contract almost twice that amount. It was the biggest arms deal ever in Sweden, and money marked for development projects was diverted to secure this contract at any cost. The investigations revealed flouting of rules and bypassing of institutions.[3]

On 16 April 1987, a Swedish radio station broke out a story based on a whistleblower in the Swedish police, alleging that the reputed Swedish artillery manufacturer Bofors had paid kickbacks to people in several countries, including Sweden and India, to secure a ₹15 billion (equivalent to ₹200 billion or US$2.4 billion in 2023) contract. This had been done the previous year for a deal to supply 410 155 mm calibre howitzer guns for the Indian army.[4] However, none of the newspapers in India were aware of this. In May 1987, a broadcast by a Swedish radio station revealed that bribes of ₹600 million (equivalent to ₹8.2 billion or US$98 million in 2023) had been paid by Bofors to Indian politicians, members of the Congress party and bureaucrats. This was picked up by a young journalist from The Hindu, Chitra Subramaniam, who happened to be in Sweden at that time, covering another story. The scale of the corruption was far worse than any that Sweden and India had seen before and directly led to the defeat of Gandhi's ruling Indian National Congress party in the November 1989 general elections.[5] The Swedish company paid ₹640 million (US$7.7 million) in kickbacks to top Indian politicians and key defence officials.[6]

The case came into light during Vishwanath Pratap Singh's tenure as defence minister, and was revealed through investigative journalism tipped off by a Reuters news revelation on Swedish radio, followed up by a team led by N. Ram of the newspaper The Hindu.[7] The journalist who secured the over 350 documents that detailed the payoffs was Chitra Subramaniam reporting for The Hindu. Later the articles were published in The Indian Express and The Statesman when The Hindu stopped publishing stories about the Bofors scandal under immense government pressure and Chitra Subramaniam moved to the two newspapers. In an interview with her, published in The Hoot in April 2012 on the 25th anniversary of the revelations,[8] Sten Lindstrom, former chief of Swedish police, discussed why he leaked the documents to her and the role of whistle-blowers in a democracy.[2]

Chronology of events and investigation

On 24 March 1986, a $285 million contract between the Government of India and Swedish arms company Bofors was signed for supply of 410 155 mm Howitzer field guns.[9] About a year later, on 16 April 1987, Swedish Radio alleged that Bofors paid kickbacks to people from a number of countries including top Swedish[10] and Indian politicians and key defence officials to seal the deal.[9][11] As a result of the revelations, the Indian government blacklisted Bofors in 1987, preventing the company from doing business in India.[12]

The middleman associated with the scandal was Ottavio Quattrocchi, an Italian businessman who represented the petrochemicals firm Snamprogetti.[2] Quattrocchi was reportedly close to the family of Rajiv Gandhi and emerged as a powerful broker in the 1980s between big businesses and the Indian government.[2] While the case was being investigated, Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated for unrelated reasons by the LTTE.[2] In 1997, the Swiss banks released some 500 documents after years of legal battle.

In 1999, the Indian government lifted its blacklist on Bofors. The lifting of the ban came during the Kargil War, when the Bofors guns proved to be efficient but were crippled by a shortage of spare parts.[12]

On 22 October 1999 (when National Democratic Alliance government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party was in power) the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed the first chargesheet against Quattrocchi, Win Chadha, Rajiv Gandhi, the defence secretary S. K. Bhatnagar and a number of others.[13] In second half of 2001, Win Chadha and S. K. Bhatnagar died.[14]

On 10 June 2002, Delhi High Court quashed all proceedings in the case so far. However, this was reversed by Supreme Court of India on 7 July 2003.[15]

Meanwhile, the central government changed and Indian National Congress came to power after 2004 Lok Sabha elections. On 5 February 2004 even before Indian National Congress came to power in India, the Delhi High Court quashed the charges of bribery against Rajiv Gandhi and others,[16] On 31 May 2005, the Delhi High Court dismissed the allegations against the British business brothers, Srichand, Gopichand and Prakash Hinduja, but charges against others remain.[17] In December 2005, Mr B. Daat, the Additional Solicitor General of India, acting on behalf of the Indian Government and the CBI, requested the British Government that two British bank accounts of Quattrocchi be unfrozen on the grounds of insufficient evidence to link these accounts to the Bofors payoff. The two accounts, containing €3 million and $1 million, had been frozen. On 16 January, the Indian Supreme Court directed the Indian government to ensure that Ottavio Quattrocchi did not withdraw money from the two bank accounts in London. The CBI, the Indian federal law enforcement agency, on 23 January 2006 admitted that roughly ₹210 million, about US$4.6 million, in the two accounts have already been withdrawn by the accused. The British government released the funds later.[13]

However, on 16 January 2006, CBI claimed in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court that they were still pursuing extradition orders for Quattrocchi. The Interpol, at the request of the CBI, has a long-standing red corner notice to arrest Quattrocchi.[18] Quattrocchi was detained in Argentina on 6 February 2007, but the news of his detention was released by the CBI only on 23 February. Quattrocchi was released by Argentinian police. However, his passport was impounded and he was not allowed to leave the country.[19]

As there was no extradition treaty between India and Argentina, the case was presented in the Argentine Supreme Court. The government of India lost the extradition case as the government of India did not provide a key court order which was the basis of Quattrocchi's arrest. In the aftermath, the government did not appeal this decision because of delays in securing an official English translation of the court's decision.[20]

A Delhi court provided temporary relief for Quattrocchi from the case, for lack of sufficient evidence against him, on 4 March 2011.[21] However the case is still going on.

On 12 July 2013, Quattrochi died of a heart attack in Milan.[22]

Despite the controversy, the Bofors gun was used extensively as the primary field artillery during the Kargil War with Pakistan and gave India 'an edge' against Pakistan according to battlefield commanders.[23]

In his book, Unknown Facets of Rajiv Gandhi, Jyoti Basu and Indrajit Gupta, released in November 2013, former CBI director Dr A P Mukherjee wrote that Rajiv Gandhi wanted commission paid by defence suppliers to be used exclusively for the purpose of meeting expenses of running the Congress party.[24] Mukherjee said Gandhi explained his position in a meeting on 19 June 1989, during a meeting between the two at the Prime Minister's residence.[25] However, as per Sten Lindstrom, the former head of Swedish police, who led the investigations, they did not find anything to suggest that payments had been received by Rajiv Gandhi. He was, however, guilty of knowing about the kickbacks and not taking action on them.[26]

Michael Hershman of the Fairfax Group, who made one of the earliest discoveries about the Bofors Scam, in an interview with a News Channel in October 2017, spoke about the arms deal and related irregularities.[27]

Political effects

The Bofors scandal was a major issue that was highlighted in subsequent elections, which led to the Congress losing power. Though it was widely believed that V. P. Singh resigned from Rajiv Gandhi's cabinet due to the Bofors scandal, Singh clarified that he had resigned due to differences in the cabinet in commissions taken by Indian agents in the HDW submarine deal (Shishumar class)[28]

Middlemen in Indian arms deals

Middlemen were employed in arms deals in India, both during the British Raj as well as in independent India, and commissions were paid to them under various headings and guises.[29] Some of these were paid as personal bribes while others were paid as contributions to political parties.[30] This led to high levels of corruption, and payments being made to politicians, bureaucrats and defence personnel to influence decisions. This practice was made illegal by Rajiv Gandhi in 1985 as it led to large kickbacks being paid in defence deals, especially those related to aircraft and ships.[31][32]

In 2015, the Government of India under the Narendra Modi government made the use of middlemen in arms deals legal, if they called themselves "company representatives".[33] The then defence minister Manohar Parrikar announced that in such cases, middlemen would be paid by the government for fixing arms deals under the name of "legal fees".[34]

Allegations against CBI

CBI has been criticised by experts, social workers, political parties and people at large for the manner in which it has handled this case. Some points to be noted:

  • Delay in lodging an FIR
  • Delay in sending letter rogatories
  • Not appealing against the judgement of the Delhi High Court in 2004
  • De-freezing of Quattrocchi's bank account in London by saying to the Crown Prosecutor that there is no case against Quattrocchi[35]
  • Putting up a very weak case for Quattrocchi's extradition from Argentina. Subsequently, no appeal against lower court's verdict[36]
  • The withdrawal of the Interpol Red Corner notice[37]
  • Finally, withdrawal of its case against Quattrocchi. Reacting to this, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vinod Yadav said that, "I agree that there are certain malafide intentions in the case and there is no doubt in that"[38]

See also

References

  1. ^ Whiteside, R. M.; Wilson, A.; Blackburn, S.; Hörnig, S. E. (2012). Major Companies of Europe 1990/91 Volume 3: Major Companies of Western Europe outside the European Economic Community. p. 185. ISBN 9789400908017.
  2. ^ a b c d e "What the Bofors scandal is all about". IBN Live. Archived from the original on 28 August 2012.
  3. ^ "The Bofors story, 25 years after : Interview with Sten Lindstrom". The Hoot. 24 April 2012. Archived from the original on 18 June 2012. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  4. ^ Joseph, Josy. "Arms and the Middlemen". www.indialegallive.com. India Legal. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  5. ^ Joseph, Josy (3 May 2016). "Arms and the middleman". The Hindu. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  6. ^ "Key players in Bofors scandal : Latest Headlines, News - India Today". 'Indiatoday.intoday.in. 28 April 2009. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  7. ^ "Rediff on the NeT: Vir Sanghvi looks back at the Bofors scandal". Rediff.com. 23 September 1999.
  8. ^ "The Bofors story, 25 years after". Thehoot.org. 16 April 1987. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014.
  9. ^ a b "25 years of India's 'Watergate': The Bofors scandal". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016.
  10. ^ "The Bofors story, 25 years after : An Interview with Sten Lindstrom". The Hoot. 24 April 2012. Archived from the original on 18 June 2012. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  11. ^ "Interview with Chitra Subramaniam and Madhu Trehan". Chitra : The story behind Bofors. News Laundry. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  12. ^ a b Past still haunts defence ministry
  13. ^ a b "Chronology of the Bofors scandal". Daily News and Analysis.
  14. ^ "Win Chadha's death, a setback to Bofors case". The Hindu. 25 October 2001. Archived from the original on 20 June 2006. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
  15. ^ "SC court reverses Delhi HC decision to quash all proceeding in Bofors scam". indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  16. ^ "Rajiv Gandhi cleared over bribery". BBC News. 4 February 2004.
  17. ^ "Welcome to Frontline : Vol. 30 :: No. 05". Hinduonnet.com. Archived from the original on 17 December 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
  18. ^ "CBI seeks time to mull on Quattrocchi's case". Zeenews.com. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  19. ^ "The Q Deja Vu, Outlook Feb 26, 2007". Outlook. Archived from the original on 5 March 2007.
  20. ^ "Welcome to Frontline : Vol. 30 :: No. 05". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 17 April 2008.
  21. ^ "Bofors case: 'Petitioner interested in cheap publicity'". The Times of India. 5 March 2011.
  22. ^ + val.created_at + (13 July 2013). "Bofors scam: Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi dies". NDTV.com. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  23. ^ "Bofors gun helped India win against Pak". Rediff.com. 8 July 2009.
  24. ^ "Rajiv Gandhi told me to use arms deal payoffs for party funds: Ex-CBI chief". Indian Express. 13 November 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  25. ^ "Rajiv Gandhi wanted Bofors money to run Congress: Ex-CBI chief". The Times of India. 14 November 2013.
  26. ^ Subramaniam, Chitra (24 April 2012). "The bofors story : 25 years after - an interview with Sten Lindstrom". The Hoot. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  27. ^ "Michael Hershman speaks on Bofors". Republic World. 17 October 2017.
  28. ^ Gupta, Shekhar (1 July 2005). "Walk the talk - an interview with V.P.Singh". NDTV. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  29. ^ "Arms and the Middlemen - 7 September 2016". India Legal. India legal. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  30. ^ Joseph, Josy (15 July 2016). A Feast of Vultures: The Hidden Business of Democracy in India. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-9350297513. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  31. ^ "India Puts New Arms Deals With Finmeccanica On Hold". Defence world net. 6 August 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  32. ^ Joseph, Josy (3 May 2016). "Arms and the middleman". The Hindu. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  33. ^ "Modi govt to legalise middlemen in arms deals?". Rediff News. 13 December 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  34. ^ Doval, Nikita (13 January 2015). "The debate over defence middlemen". Live Mint. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  35. ^ "Farewell Gift to the Nation- In-Law". 28 April 2009. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  36. ^ "CBI lets "Q" Off the hook". Archived from the original on 11 December 2007. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  37. ^ "Bofors case: Court to hold fresh proceedings in Quattrocchi's case". The Times of India. 28 August 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  38. ^ "Bofors: Court Pulls up CBI's 'Malafide Intentions'". Archived from the original on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 27 April 2012.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bofors_scandal&oldid=1000716140"