Jump to content

Gentrification of Chicago

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Isvcu2 (talk | contribs) at 06:33, 21 July 2018 (→Factors that are positively associated with gentrification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Gentrification of Chicago is a process that has altered the demographic composition of some neighborhoods in Chicago usually by decreasing the percentage of low-income minority residents and increasing the percentage of typically white, higher-income residents.[1] Gentrification has been an issue between the residents of minority neighborhoods in Chicago who believe the influx of new residents destabilizes their communities, and the gentrifiers who see it as a process that economically improves a neighborhood.[2] Researchers have debated the significance of its effects on the neighborhoods and whether or not it leads to the displacement of residents.[2] There are some researchers who claim that the loss of affordable housing mainly impacts the poorer minority residents and causes them to have to move out of their neighborhoods which destabilizes their cultural communities.[2] However, critics say that since gentrification often excludes highly black neighborhoods, those residents are prevented from benefiting from any of the positive effects such as redevelopment and neighborhood investment.[3] Factors associated with and used to measure gentrification in Chicago are changes in the number of residents with bachelor's degrees, median household income, racial composition, visual observations, and the presence of coffee shops.[4][1][5] Historically, the emergence of urban black and Latino neighborhoods in Chicago during the 1950s through the 1970s were made possible because of the waves of white residents moving out into more suburban neighborhoods.[2] There have been phases of gentrification in Chicago of various neighborhoods, some of which were in 1990s and in 2007-2009.[4][5] Gentrification debates in Chicago have been mostly focused around the gentrification of Chicago's historically Latino or black neighborhoods.[2][5] Generally, these neighborhoods are located near the central urban downtown areas and along the east side of the city.[6][5][7]

Gentrification debate

Generally, the two views held by researchers on gentrification are that it is a process which either negatively affects local residents and their community or that it is a process that positively affects the local economy and revitalizes a neighborhood.[2] Some researchers claim that the negative effect of gentrification is that it leads to displacement of poorer residents by wealthier residents.[2] They argue that the increase in property values and rents forces poor residents out of the neighborhood.[8][9] On the other hand, other researchers claim that the revitalization and increased economic growth of a neighborhood outweigh the adverse effects.[2] Proponents of gentrification also claim that the displacement is actually a sign that people are moving because they freely choose to.[2] However, Boyd (2008) and Perez (2002) state in their studies that current residents of the gentrified neighborhood feel threatened by the arrival of white gentrifiers.[9][8]

In 2015 Governing published an article on their website in which they calculated Chicago's gentrification rate at 16.8%.[10] The article also counted gentrification happening in 51 tracks within Chicago.[10] Another study calculated Chicago's probability of gentrification at 26.2% by taking into account immigration rates into the city.[6] Overall, the data suggests that gentrification of Chicago is happening in relatively few neighborhoods.[7] Some critics of anti-gentrification propose that gentrification is not major issue for low-income communities because it is a localized process that is rare and typically does not affect displacement rates.[3] There is evidence in the research to support these critics claims that gentrification does harm nearby neighborhoods that were not gentrified because they miss out on investment opportunities.[3] Hwang and Sampson's (2014) claimed in their study that positive effects of gentrification associated with urban renewal did not come to benefit poorer black minority neighborhoods because it led to more disinvestment.[5] Because of the ethnographic trends associated with gentrification, for example one study found that communities that are 90% black are less likely to be gentrified, and these neighborhoods are unable to benefit from urban renewal or investment.[7][3] Those in favor of gentrification view it as a process that can help increase proportion of middle class residents in a neighborhood.[2]

Types of gentrification

Sociologist and other researchers at times specify the specific type of gentrification by using terms such as: white gentrification, black gentrification, or Latino gentrification.[11][7] The agents of gentrification can be wealthier white residents moving in as well as wealthier black and Hispanic residents. Researchers have noted that different gentrifiers affect the ways in which local communities react to gentrification and how they see the invasion of space.[7]

Factors that impact gentrification

Factors that are positively associated with gentrification

Researchers study census records, surveys, and information derived from other public records like building permits filed with the city to understand the factors associated with gentrification.[7][12] These factors will vary from city to city as well as their effects on gentrification.[13] In Chicago, researchers have found several characteristics that were common among gentrified tracks such as the proximity to the city center, central business district, the ethnographic and racial composition, and the availability of older housing stock.[13][7] In the past, wealthier residents of a city have resided outside the city center, but in the past two decades there has been an influx of higher income residents to urban neighborhoods, which some researchers claim are agents of gentrification.[13][12] Many gentrifiers are attracted to neighborhoods that a have relatively high minority composition, and researchers say that it is because the idea of living in a diverse neighborhood is appealing to gentrifiers.[7][12] One study used GIS, addresses, and statistical analysis to determine that gentrifiers were also attracted to access to public transportation since there was an association between proximity to Chicago's "L" stations and neighborhoods that were gentrified.[12]

Deterrents to gentrification

Researchers have noted that neighborhoods with higher concentrations of black residents and lower public perceptions have not been gentrified.[5][12][7] One study concluded that if a neighborhood has a concentration of black residents higher than 40% then it was less likely to be gentrified, which was associated with less investment and resources for black residents.[5] This "neighborhood selection" was connected by researchers as being a contributing factor increased inequality for urban blacks in Chicago.[5] Proximity to interstates or highways was associated with a decreased likelihood that the neighborhood would gentrify because they are not heavily used by most typical gentrifiers.[12]

Impact on crime rates, schools, and housing

Crime rates and schools

Papachristos et al. (2011) related the number of coffee shops, a marker of gentrification, to the decrease in crime rates in neighborhoods in Chicago between 1991 and 2005.[1] However, the study found that gentrification was associated with increased crime rates in black neighborhoods.[1] Chaskin and Joseph's (2013) research provided another perspective on how residents perceive crime in that part of their perception is colored by behavior that is technically noncriminal, but deviates from their preferred social norms.[14] With regard to schools, the current research does not indicate that schools are being negatively impacted.[4]

Housing

Research has associated demolition of public housing and low income housing options with gentrification, and it has affected black residents in cities like Chicago.[11] Some research specify that the problem occurs when developers and policy makers neglect to create affordable housing and focus their efforts on increasing property values and on building housing for new more affluent residents.[9] There are efforts being made to integrate the local community in the gentrification process to minimize adverse effects for low-income minority residents, "positive gentrification".[14] Still, others say that gentrification's lasting effects on communities lead to instability within neighborhoods, particularly Latino and black neighborhoods.[2] While the city does offer Housing Choice Vouchers, Holloway's (2015) research provides evidence that suggests that these voucher programs have contributed to increased segregation of low-income black residents and not helped black residents move to redeveloped housing.[15]

History of gentrification of Chicago

Each community area and neighborhood have a unique story regarding their current demographic composition and cultural narrative.[13][9][2] Some neighborhoods began growing as Eastern European immigrant communities, which then evolved to consist of a different minority immigrant population.[2] After whites left Chicago's urban neighborhoods in the 1950s, a process known as white flight, Latinos, blacks, and other minorities moved into urban neighborhoods and established their own communities.[2] Their communities have faced challenges by the process of urban renewal and redevelopment.[2][16] Developers built new homes in Lincoln Park and Old Park in the 1980s and by the 1990s other neighborhoods were also gentrified, such as Wicker Park and Humboldt Park.[17] Helms (2003) described whites' relocation to neighborhoods closer to downtown as part of a "back-to-the-city" phenomenon as one of the driving forces behind the gentrification of urban neighborhoods in Chicago that has been happening throughout the 20th century and into the 21st century.[12] Then because of Chicago's history of being a "hyper segregated" city (Massey and Denton 1993), many of its black neighborhoods are wary of outside interventions as they have in the past face policies that perpetuate housing segregation and the disinvestment associated with it.[2][9][7][18] Researchers characterize the gentrification in Chicago to have racial order undertones because of historic segregation practices against black, Hispanic, and other minority groups.[7][9][19] The city government has begun to take an active role in creating neighborhood stability by preserving bungalow neighborhoods to help minimize the negative effects of gentrification beginning in 2000.[16]

Analysis by neighborhood

Map depicting Chicago's neighborhoods. Humboldt Park is located in the center of the city and Bronzeville within Douglas.
Chicago community areas map: Pilsen is located in Lower West Side, Bronzeville is located in South Side

Humboldt Park

Humboldt Park, Chicago has one the largest Puerto Rican-American communities in the United States.[17] Reinvestment and upgrade in homes in the 1990s has led to gentrification.[17] Researchers, Wilson and Grammenos (2005) described how proponents of redeveloping real estate in Humboldt Park saw it as "benevolent gentrification" as it would help increase property values, and some used the image of a stereotyped version of the neighborhoods Puerto Rican youth to portray Humboldt Park as a dangerous ghetto like space in need of redevelopment.[17] Another strategy that gentrifiers employ is to not use the name Humboldt Park and instead use the name West Bucktown in describing the location of housing in advertisements.[8] The Puerto Rican residents of Humboldt Park view redevelopment and gentrification efforts as an incursion on their cultural identity because of the history of radicalized policies and rhetoric that have been used by gentrifiers.[19]

Resistance to gentrification in Humboldt Park

Puerto Rican residents within the community have felt threatened by the changes in their neighborhood because they fear gentrification will destabilize their community and voiced their concerns.[17] Individual Puetro Rican residents have led the effort to resist gentrification and promote strategies that in their eyes will protect their Puerto Rican community.[17] For anti-gentrification activists change in their neighborhood is especially personal because they see it as detrimental to their cultural identity.[17]

Bronzeville

Chicago's Bronzeville neighborhood is located in the South Side community area and celebrates its recognition as a historically black neighborhood.[7][11] It is predominantly composed of lower-income black and African-American residents and is an example site of black gentrification.[11] Goetz (2010) published a study that supported the claim that gentrification led to the scarcity of public housing, which disproportionately affected residents that rely on the availability of public housing.[11] According to Boyd (2008) gentrification has occurred due to city officials, incoming wealthier white residents, and black elites who have not made it their primary concern to maintain the availability of affordable housing and instead focused on upgrading the neighborhood.[9]

Resistance to gentrification in Bronzeville

Boyd's (2008) ethnographic study used the term defense development to describe how South Sides black elites were attempting to maintain a sense of control within their community through public and economic policy as a result of feeling that gentrifiers were encroaching on their space and disrupting their community network.[9] However, Boyd (2008) states that their efforts to limit the influence of outside gentrifiers has had the undesired effects of increasing the rate of gentrification overall and disproportionally affecting lower income residents.[9]

Pilsen

The demographics Pilsen, Chicago changed from being composed primarily of residents of European ancestry to those of Latino ancestry in the 1960s.[2] According to a study published in 2016 between the years of 2000-2013 Pilsen has been experiencing gentrification as coffee shops, artisan bakeries, and upscale restaurants open up on or near 18th Street.[20] In 2000, Pilsen was 89% Hispanic, and by 2013 the neighborhood was 81.6% Hispanic.[21] During that time, white residents increased from around 8% to around 12% of the total population.[21] The increase of traffic from tourist and changes in the demographic composition has worried some local residents, while recognizing that the neighborhood has benefited from the economic growth.[22]

Resistance to gentrification in Pilsen

Thalia Hall was purchased and renovated in 2013 for public use as a community and business center.[23][24] Mexican-American residents were concerned with the new redevelopment and the influx of higher income residents into the neighborhood that would negatively impact their Hispanic cultural community.[25]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Papachristos, Andrew V.; Smith, Chris M.; Scherer, Mary L.; Fugiero, Melissa A. (September 2011). "More Coffee, Less Crime? The Relationship between Gentrification and Neighborhood Crime Rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005". City & Community. 10 (3): 215–240. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01371.x.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Betancur, John (29 June 2010). "Gentrification and Community Fabric in Chicago". Urban Studies. 48 (2): 383–406. doi:10.1177/0042098009360680.
  3. ^ a b c d Buntin, John (2015-01-14). "The Myth of Gentrification". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 2017-11-27.
  4. ^ a b c Keels, Micere; Burdick-Will, Julia; Keene, Sara (September 2013). "The Effects of Gentrification on Neighborhood Public Schools". City & Community. 12 (3): 238–259. doi:10.1111/cico.12027.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Hwang, Jackelyn; Sampson, Robert J. (12 June 2014). "Divergent Pathways of Gentrification". American Sociological Review. 79 (4): 726–751. doi:10.1177/0003122414535774.
  6. ^ a b Lee, Barrett A.; Firebaugh, Glenn; Iceland, John; Matthews, Stephen A.; Hwang, Jackelyn (9 June 2015). "Gentrification in Changing Cities". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 660 (1): 319–340. doi:10.1177/0002716215579823.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Timberlake, Jeffrey M.; Johns-Wolfe, Elaina (3 August 2016). "Neighborhood Ethnoracial Composition and Gentrification in Chicago and New York, 1980 to 2010". Urban Affairs Review. 53 (2): 236–272. doi:10.1177/1078087416636483.
  8. ^ a b c Pérez, Gina M. (2002). "The Other "Real World": Gentrification And The Social Construction Of Place In Chicago". Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development. 31 (1): 37–68. doi:10.2307/40553556. JSTOR 40553556.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i Boyd, Michelle (July 2008). "Defensive Development". Urban Affairs Review. 43 (6): 751–776. doi:10.1177/1078087407313581.
  10. ^ a b "Gentrification in America Report". www.governing.com. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  11. ^ a b c d e Goetz, Edward (12 November 2010). "Gentrification in Black and White". Urban Studies. 48 (8): 1581–1604. doi:10.1177/0042098010375323.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g Helms, Andrew C. (November 2003). "Understanding gentrification: an empirical analysis of the determinants of urban housing renovation". Journal of Urban Economics. 54 (3): 474–498. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00081-0.
  13. ^ a b c d Kolko, Jed (December 2007). "The Determinants of Gentrification". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. ^ a b Chaskin, Robert J.; Joseph, Mark L. (March 2013). "'Positive' Gentrification, Social Control and the 'Right to the City' in Mixed-Income Communities: Uses and Expectations of Space and Place". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 37 (2): 480–502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01158.x.
  15. ^ M., Holloway, Adrienne (2015-04-01). "Are Low-Income African American Households Accessing Redeveloped Neighborhoods? A Case Study of Four Chicago Neighborhoods". The Journal of Race & Policy. 11 (1). ISSN 1540-8450.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ a b Karamanski, Theodore J. (2010). "History, Memory, and Historic Districts in Chicago". The Public Historian. 32 (4): 33–41. doi:10.1525/tph.2010.32.4.33. JSTOR 10.1525/tph.2010.32.4.33.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Wilson, David; Grammenos, Dennis (29 November 2016). "Gentrification, Discourse, and the Body: Chicago's Humboldt Park". Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 23 (2): 295–312. doi:10.1068/d0203.
  18. ^ Massey, Douglas S.; Denton, Nancy A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674018211.
  19. ^ a b Jesse, Mumm, (2016-10-01). "Gentrification in Color and Time: White and Puerto Rican Racial Histories at Work in Humboldt Park". Centro Journal. 28 (2).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Betancur, John J; Kim, Youngjun (2016). "The Trajectory and Impact of Ongoing Gentrification in Pilsen". Nathalie P. Voorhees Center.
  21. ^ a b Pilsen Gets Whiter As 10,000 Hispanics, Families Move Out, Study Finds Stephanie Lulay, DNAinfo, April 13, 2016
  22. ^ "In Chicago's Pilsen neighborhood, the face is changing". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 2017-11-27.
  23. ^ "A Hall Reborn, a Neighborhood Altered – South Side Weekly". southsideweekly.com. Retrieved 2017-11-27.
  24. ^ "Trendy nightclub owner eyes historic Thalia Hall in Pilsen". Crain's Chicago Business. Retrieved 2017-11-27.
  25. ^ (http://7interactive.cz/), 7interactive s.r.o. "Divus | IT IS FUN TO BE BOHEMIAN - A video-documentary project about the Pilsen quarter in Chicago". divus.cc. Retrieved 2017-11-27. {{cite web}}: External link in |last= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gentrification_of_Chicago&oldid=851277220"