Jump to content

Positive psychology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Positive Psychology)

Positive psychology is a field of psychological theory and research of optimal human functioning of people, groups, and institutions.[1][2] It studies "positive subjective experience, positive individual traits, and positive institutions... it aims to improve quality of life."[3]

Positive psychology began as a new domain of psychology in 1998 when Martin Seligman chose it as the theme for his term as president of the American Psychological Association.[4][5] It is a reaction against past practices which tended to focus on mental illness and which emphasized maladaptive behavior and negative thinking. It builds on the humanistic movement of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers, which encourages an emphasis on happiness, well-being, and purpose.[5][6]

Positive psychology largely relies on concepts from the Western philosophical tradition, such as the Aristotelian concept of eudaimonia,[7] which is typically rendered in English with the terms "flourishing", "the good life" or "happiness".[8] Positive psychologists study empirically the conditions and processes that contribute to flourishing, subjective well-being, and happiness,[2] often using these terms interchangeably.

Positive psychologists suggest a number of factors that may contribute to happiness and subjective well-being, for example: social ties with a spouse, family, friends, colleagues, and wider networks; membership in clubs or social organizations; physical exercise; and the practice of meditation.[9] Spiritual practice and religious commitment is another possible source for increased well-being.[10] Happiness may rise with increasing income, though it may plateau or even fall when no further gains are made or after a certain cut-off amount.[11]

Definition and basic assumptions




Martin Seligman and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi define positive psychology as "the scientific study of positive human functioning and flourishing on multiple levels that include the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life."[12]

Basic concepts


Positive psychology concerns eudaimonia, a word that means human thriving or flourishing.[13][page needed] A "good life" is defined by psychologists and philosophers as consisting of authentic expression of self, a sense of well-being, and active engagement in life.[14]

Positive psychology aims to complement and extend traditional problem-focused psychology. It concerns positive states (e.g. happiness), positive traits (e.g. talents, interests, strengths of character), positive relationships, and positive institutions and how these apply to physical health.[15]

Seligman proposes that a person can best promote their well-being by nurturing their character strengths.[16] Seligman identifies other possible goals of positive psychology: families and schools that allow children to grow, workplaces that aim for satisfaction and high productivity, and teaching others about positive psychology.[17]

A basic premise of positive psychology is that human actions arise from our anticipations about the future; these anticipations are informed by our past experiences.[18]

Those who practice positive psychology attempt psychological interventions that foster positive attitudes toward one's subjective experiences, individual traits, and life events.[12] The goal is to minimize pathological thoughts that may arise in a hopeless mindset and to develop a sense of optimism toward life.[12] Positive psychologists seek to encourage acceptance of one's past, excitement and optimism about one's future, and a sense of contentment and well-being in the present.[19]



Happiness can be defined in two general ways: an enjoyable state of mind, and the living of an enjoyable life.[20]

Quality of life


Quality of life is how well you are living and functioning in life. It encompasses more than just physical and mental well-being; it can also include socioeconomic factors. This term can be perceived differently in different cultures and regions around the world.[21]

Research topics


According to Seligman and Christopher Peterson, positive psychology addresses three issues: positive emotions,[22] positive individual traits,[23] and positive institutions.[24] Positive emotions concern being content with one's past, being happy in the present, and having hope for the future.[24][25] Positive individual traits are one's strengths and virtues. Positive institutions are strengths to better a community of people.[clarification needed][17]

According to Peterson, positive psychologists are concerned with four topics: positive experiences, enduring psychological traits, positive relationships, and positive institutions.[26] He also states that topics of interest to researchers in the field are states of pleasure or flow, values, strengths, virtues, talents, as well as the ways that these can be promoted by social systems and institutions.[27]



The positive psychology movement was first founded in 1998 by Martin Seligman. He was concerned about the fact that mainstream psychology was too focused on disease, disorders, and disabilities rather than wellbeing, resilience, and recovery. His goal was to apply the methodological, scientific, scholarly and organizational strengths of mainstream psychology to facilitate well-being rather than illness and disease.[28]

The field has been influenced by humanistic as well as psychodynamic approaches to treatment. Predating the use of the term "positive psychology", researchers within the field of psychology had focused on topics that would now be included under this new denomination.[29]

The term "positive psychology" dates at least to 1954, when Abraham Maslow's Motivation and Personality was published with a final chapter titled "Toward a Positive Psychology."[30] In the second edition published in 1970, he removed that chapter, saying in the preface that "a positive psychology is at least available today though not very widely."[31] There have been indications that psychologists since the 1950s have increasingly focused on promoting mental health rather than merely treating mental illness.[32] From the beginning of psychology, the field addressed the human experience using the "Disease model," studying and identifying the dysfunction of a person.

To Seligman, psychology (particularly its positive branch) can investigate and promote realistic ways of fostering more well-being in people and communities.

In the opening sentence of his book Authentic Happiness, Seligman claimed: "for the last half century psychology has been consumed with a single topic only—mental illness,"[33]: xi  expanding on Maslow's comments.[34] He urged psychologists to continue the earlier missions of psychology of nurturing talent and improving normal life.[35]: 1–22 



The first positive psychology summit took place in 1999. The First International Conference on Positive Psychology took place in 2002.[35]: 1–22  In September 2005, the first master's program in applied positive psychology (MAPP) was launched at the University of Pennsylvania.[36] In 2006, a course on positive psychology at Harvard University was one of the most popular courses on offer.[37] In June 2009, the First World Congress on Positive Psychology took place in Philadelphia.[38]

The field of positive psychology today is most advanced in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, and Australia.[39][page needed]



Several humanistic psychologists, most notably Maslow, Carl Rogers, and Erich Fromm, developed theories and practices pertaining to human happiness and flourishing. More recently, positive psychologists have found empirical support for the humanistic theories of flourishing.

In 1984, psychologist Ed Diener published his tripartite model of subjective well-being,[40] which posited "three distinct but often related components of wellbeing: frequent positive affect, infrequent negative affect, and cognitive evaluations such as life satisfaction."[41] In this model, cognitive, affective, and contextual factors contribute to subjective well-being.[42] According to Diener and Suh, subjective well-being is "based on the idea that how each person thinks and feels about his or her life is important."[43]

Carol Ryff's six-factor model of psychological well-being was first published in 1989. It postulates that self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, autonomy, and positive relations with others are key to well-being.[44]

According to Corey Keyes, who collaborated with Carol Ryff and uses the term flourishing as a central concept, mental well-being has three components: hedonic (i.e. subjective or emotional[45]), psychological, and social well-being.[46] Hedonic well-being concerns emotional aspects of well-being, whereas psychological and social well-being, e.g. eudaimonic well-being, concerns skills, abilities, and optimal functioning.[47] This tripartite model of mental well-being has received cross-cultural empirical support.[45][47][48]

Influences in ancient history

The works of Aristotle include elements of what is now called positive psychology

Before the use of the term "positive psychology" there were researchers who focused on topics that would now be included under the umbrella of positive psychology.[29] Some view positive psychology as a meeting of Eastern thought, such as Buddhism, and Western psychodynamic approaches.[49]

The historical roots of positive psychology are found in the teachings of Aristotle, whose Nicomachean Ethics is a description of the theory and practice of human flourishing—which he referred to as eudaimonia—of the tutelage necessary to achieve it, and of the psychological obstacles to its practice.[50] It teaches the cultivation of virtues as the means of attaining happiness and well-being.[51]

Core theory and methods


There is no accepted "gold standard" theory in positive psychology. The work of Seligman is regularly quoted,[52] as is the work of Csikszentmihalyi, and older models of well-being, such as Ryff's six-factor model of psychological well-being and Diener's tripartite model of subjective well-being.

Later, Paul Wong introduced the concept of second-wave positive psychology.

Initial theory: three paths to happiness


In Authentic Happiness (2002) Seligman proposed three kinds of a happy life that can be investigated:[33]: 275 [52]

  1. Pleasant life: research into the pleasant life, or the "life of enjoyment", examines how people optimally experience, forecast, and savor the positive feelings and emotions that are part of normal and healthy living (e.g., relationships, hobbies, interests, entertainment, etc.). Seligman says this most transient element of happiness may be the least important.[53]
  2. Good Life: investigation of the beneficial effects of immersion, absorption, and flow felt by people when optimally engaged with their primary activities, is the study of the Good Life, or the "life of engagement". Flow is experienced when there is a match between a person's strengths and their current task, i.e., when one feels confident of accomplishing a chosen or assigned task. Related concepts include self-efficacy and play.
  3. Meaningful Life: inquiry into the meaningful life, or "life of affiliation", questions how people derive a positive sense of well-being, belonging, meaning, and purpose from being part of and contributing back to something larger and more enduring than themselves (e.g., nature, social groups, organizations, movements, traditions, belief systems).[54]


PERMA: Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning and purpose, and Accomplishments.
PERMA model

In Flourish (2011), Seligman argued that the last category of his proposed three kinds of a happy life, "meaningful life", can be considered as three different categories. The resulting summary for this theory is the mnemonic acronym PERMA: Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning and purpose, and Accomplishments.[52][55]

Positive emotions
include a wide range of feelings, not just happiness and joy,[56]: ch. 1  but excitement, satisfaction, pride, and awe, amongst others. These are connected to positive outcomes, such as longer life and healthier social relationships.[25]
refers to involvement in activities that draw and build upon one's interests. Csikszentmihalyi explains true engagement as flow, a state of deep effortless involvement,[52] a feeling of intensity that leads to a sense of ecstasy and clarity.[57] The task being done must call upon a particular skill and it should be possible while being a little bit challenging. Engagement involves passion for and concentration on the task at hand—complete absorption and loss of self-consciousness.[56]: ch. 1 
are essential in fueling positive emotions,[28]whether they are work-related, familial, romantic, or platonic. As Peterson puts it, "other people matter."[58] Humans receive, share, and spread positivity to others through relationships. Relationships are important in bad times and good times. Relationships can be strengthened by reacting to one another positively. Typically positive things take place in the presence of other people.[59]
is also known as purpose, and answers the question of "why?" Discovering a clear "why" puts everything into context from work to relationships to other parts of life.[28] Finding meaning is learning that there is something greater than oneself. Working with meaning drives people to continue striving for a desirable goal.
are the pursuit of success and mastery.[56]: ch. 1  Unlike the other parts of PERMA, they are sometimes pursued even when accomplishments do not result in positive emotions, meaning, or relationships. Accomplishments can activate other elements of PERMA, such as pride, under positive emotion.[60] Accomplishments can be individual or community-based, fun-based, or work-based.

Each of the five PERMA elements was selected according to three criteria:

  1. It contributes to well-being.
  2. It is pursued for its own sake.
  3. It is defined and measured independently of the other elements.

Character Strengths and Virtues


The Character Strengths and Virtues (CSV) handbook (2004) was the first attempt by Seligman and Peterson to identify and classify positive psychological traits of human beings. Much like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of general psychology, the CSV provided a theoretical framework to assist in understanding strengths and virtues and for developing practical applications for positive psychology. It identified six classes of virtues (i.e., "core virtues"), underlying 24 measurable character strengths.[61]

The CSV suggested these six virtues have a historical basis in the vast majority of cultures and that they can lead to increased happiness when built upon. Notwithstanding numerous cautions and caveats, this suggestion of universality leads to three theories:[61]: 51 

  1. The study of positive human qualities broadens the scope of psychological research to include mental wellness.
  2. The leaders of the positive psychology movement challenge moral relativism by suggesting people are "evolutionarily predisposed" toward certain virtues.
  3. Virtue has a biological basis.

The organization of the six virtues and 24 strengths is as follows:

  1. Wisdom and knowledge: creativity, curiosity, open-mindedness, love of learning, perspective, innovation, prudence
  2. Courage: bravery, persistence, vitality, zest
  3. Humanity: love, kindness, social intelligence
  4. Justice: citizenship, fairness, leadership, integrity, excellence
  5. Temperance: forgiveness and mercy, humility, self-control
  6. Transcendence: appreciation of beauty, gratitude, hope, humor, spirituality

Subsequent research challenged the need for six virtues. Instead, researchers suggested the 24 strengths are more accurately grouped into just three or four categories: Intellectual Strengths, Interpersonal Strengths, and Temperance Strengths,[62] or alternatively, Interpersonal Strengths, Fortitude, Vitality, and Cautiousness.[63] These strengths, and their classifications, have emerged independently elsewhere in literature on values. Paul Thagard described some examples.[64]


A graph shows mental state in terms of challenge level and skill level, according to Csikszentmihalyi's flow model.
Mental state in terms of challenge level and skill level, according to Csikszentmihalyi's flow model.

In the 1970s, Csikszentmihalyi began studying flow, a state of absorption in which one's abilities are well-matched to the demands at-hand. He often refers to it as "optimal experience".[65] Flow is characterized by intense concentration, loss of self-awareness, a feeling of being perfectly challenged (neither bored nor overwhelmed), and a sense that "time is flying." Flow is intrinsically rewarding; it can also assist in the achievement of goals (e.g., winning a game) or improving skills (e.g., becoming a better chess player).[66] Anyone can experience flow and it can be felt in different domains, such as play, creativity, and work.

Flow is achieved when the challenge of the situation meets one's personal abilities. A mismatch of challenge for someone of low skills results in a state of anxiety and feeling overwhelmed; insufficient challenge for someone highly skilled results in boredom.[66] A good example of this would be an adult reading a children's book. They would not feel challenged enough to be engaged or motivated in the reading. Csikszentmihalyi explained this using various combinations of challenge and skills to predict psychological states. These four states included the following:[67]

low challenge and low skill(s)
low challenge and high skill(s)
high challenge and low skill(s)
high challenge and high skill(s)

Accordingly, an adult reading a children's book would most likely be in the relaxation state. The adult has no need to worry that the task will be more than they can handle. Challenge is a well-founded explanation for how one enters the flow state and employs intense concentration. However, other factors contribute. For example, one must be intrinsically motivated to participate in the activity/challenge. If the person is not interested in the task, then there is no possibility of their being absorbed into the flow state.[68]



Flow can help in parenting children. When flow is enhanced between[clarification needed] parents and children, the parents can better thrive in their roles as a parents. A parenting style that is positively oriented[definition needed] results in children who experience lower levels of stress and improved well-being.[69]

Flow also has benefits in a school setting. When students are in a state of flow they are fully engaged, leading to better retention of information.[70] Students who experience flow have a more enjoyable and rewarding experience.[71] This state can also reduce stress, which helps with students' mental health and well-being.[72] This increases resilience and helps students to overcome challenges or setbacks by teaching them a growth mindset.[73]

Most teachers and parents want students become more engaged and interested in the classroom. The design of the education system was not able to account for such needs.[74] One school implemented a program called PASS. They acknowledged that students needed more challenge and individual advancement; they referred to this as sport culture. This PASS program integrated an elective class into which students could immerse themselves. Such activities included self-paced learning, mastery-based learning, performance learning, and so on.[75]

Flow benefits general well-being. It is a positive and intrinsically motivating experience. It is known to "produce intense feelings of enjoyment".[68] It can improve our lives by making them happier and more meaningful. Csikszentmihalyi discovered that our personal growth and development generates happiness. Flow is positive experience because it promotes that opportunity for personal development.[76]



While flow can be beneficial to students, students who experience flow can become overly focused on a particular task. This can lead to students neglecting other important aspects of their learning.[77]

In positive psychology there can be misunderstandings on what clinicians and people define as positive. In certain instances, positive qualities, such as optimism, can be detrimental to health, and therefore appear as a negative quality.[78] Alternatively, negative processes, such as anxiety, can be conducive to health and stability and thus would appear as positive qualities.[78] A second wave of positive psychology has further identified and characterized "positive" and "negative" complexes through the use of critical and dialectical thinking.[78] Researchers in 2016 chose to identify these characteristics via two complexes: post-traumatic growth and love as well as optimism vs. pessimism.[78]

Second-wave positive psychology


Paul Wong introduced the idea of a second wave of positive psychology, focused on the pursuit of meaning in life, which he contrasted with the pursuit of happiness in life.[79] Ivtzan, Lomas, Hefferon, and Worth have recast positive psychology as being about positive outcome or positive mental health, and have explored the positive outcomes of embracing negative emotions and pessimism.[80] Second-wave positive psychology proposes that it is better to accept and transform the meaning of suffering than it is to avoid suffering.[81]

In 2016, Lomas and Itzvan proposed that human flourishing (their goal for positive psychology) is about embracing dialectic interplay of positive and negative.[78] Phenomena cannot be determined to be positive or negative independent of context. Some of their examples included:

the dialectic of optimism and pessimism
Optimism is associated with longevity, but strategic pessimism can lead to more effective planning and decision making.
the dialectic of self-esteem and humility
Self-esteem is related to well-being, but pursuit of self-esteem can increase depression. Humility can be either low self-opinion or it can lead to prosocial action.
the dialectic of forgiveness and anger
Forgiveness has been associated with well-being, but people who are more forgiving of abuse may suffer prolonged abuse. While anger has been presented as a destructive emotion, it can also be a moral emotion and drawn upon to confront injustices.

In 2019, Wong proposed four principles of second-wave positive psychology:[81]

  1. accepting and confronting with courage the reality that life is full of evil and suffering
  2. sustainable wellbeing can only be achieved through overcoming suffering and the dark side of life
  3. recognizing that everything in life comes in polarities and the importance of achieving an adaptive balance through dialectics
  4. learning from indigenous psychology, such as the ancient wisdom of finding deep joy in bad situations

Second-wave positive psychology is sometimes abbreviated as PP 2.0.

Third-wave positive psychology


The third wave of positive psychology emphasizes going beyond the individual to take a deeper look at the groups and systems in which we live. It also promotes becoming more interdisciplinary and multicultural and incorporates more methodologies.[82]

In broadening the scope and exploring the systemic and socio-cultural dimensions of people's lived realities, there are four specific things to focus on:[78]

  1. The focus of enquiry: becoming more interested in emergent paradigms like "systems-informed positive psychology" which incorporates principles and concepts from the systems sciences to optimize human social systems and the individuals within them.[83]
  2. Disciplines: becoming more multi- and interdisciplinary, as reflected in hybrid formulations like positive education, which combines traditional education and research based ways of increasing happiness and overall well-being.[84]
  3. Cultural contexts: becoming more multicultural and global
  4. Methodologies: embracing other paradigms and ways of knowing, such as qualitative and mixed methods approaches rather than relying solely on quantitative research.

Research advances and applications


Subject-matter and methodology development expanded the field of positive psychology beyond its core theories and methods. Positive psychology is now a global area of study, with various national indices tracking citizens' happiness ratings.

Research findings


Research in positive psychology, well-being, eudaimonia and happiness, and the theories of Diener, Ryff, Keyes, and Seligman cover a broad range of topics including "the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life."[12]

A meta-analysis of 49 studies showed that Positive Psychology Interventions (PPI) produced improvements in well-being and lower depression levels; the PPIs studied included writing gratitude letters, learning optimistic thinking, replaying positive life experiences, and socializing with others.[85] In a later meta-analysis of 39 studies with 6,139 participants, the outcomes were positive.[86] Three to six months after a PPI the effects on subjective well-being and psychological well-being were still significant. However the positive effect was weaker than in the earlier meta-analysis; the authors concluded that this was because they only used higher-quality studies. The PPIs they considered included counting blessings, kindness practices, making personal goals, showing gratitude, and focusing on personal strengths. Another review of PPIs found that over 78% of intervention studies were conducted in Western countries.[87]

In the textbook Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness, authors Compton and Hoffman give the "Top Down Predictors" of well-being as high self esteem, optimism, self efficacy, a sense of meaning in life, and positive relationships with others.[88] The personality traits most associated with well-being are extraversion, agreeability, and low levels of neuroticism.

In a study published in 2020, students were enrolled in a positive psychology course that focused on improving happiness and well-being through teaching about positive psychology.[89] The participants answered questions pertaining to the five PERMA categories. At the end of the semester those same students reported significantly higher scores in all categories (p<.001) except for engagement which was significant at p<.05. The authors stated, “Not only do students learn and get credit, there is also a good chance that many will reap the benefits in what is most important to them—their health, happiness, and well-being.”[89]

Academic methods




Quantitative methods in positive psychology include p-technique factor analysis, dynamic factor analysis, interindividual differences and structural equation modeling, spectral analysis and item response models, dynamic systems analysis, latent growth analysis, latent-class models, hierarchical linear modeling, measurement invariance, experimental methods, behavior genetics, and integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches.[90]



Grant J. Rich explored the use of qualitative methodology to study positive psychology.[91] Rich addresses the popularity of quantitative methods in studying the empirical questions that positive psychology presents. He argues that there is an "overemphasis" on quantitative methods and suggests implementing qualitative methods, such as semi-structured interviews, observations, fieldwork, creative artwork, and focus groups. Rich states that qualitative approaches will further promote the "flourishing of positive psychology" and encourages such practice.[91]

Behavioral interventions


Changing happiness levels through interventions is a further methodological advancement in the study of positive psychology, and has been the focus of various academic and scientific psychological publications. Happiness-enhancing interventions include expressing kindness, gratitude, optimism, humility, awe, and mindfulness.

One behavioral experiment used two six-week interventions:[92] one involving the performance of acts of kindness, and one focused on gratitude which emphasized the counting of one's blessings. The study participants who went through the behavioral interventions reported higher levels of happiness and well-being than those who did not participate in either intervention.

Another study found that the interventions of expressing optimism and expressing gratitude enhanced subjective well-being in participants who took part in the intervention for eight months.[93] The researchers concluded that interventions are "most successful when participants know about, endorse, and commit to the intervention."[93] The article provides support that when people enthusiastically take part in behavioral interventions, such as expression of optimism and gratitude, they may increase happiness and subjective well-being.

Another study examined the interaction effects between gratitude and humility through behavior interventions.[94] The interventions were writing a gratitude letter and writing a 14-day diary. In both interventions, the researchers found that gratitude and humility are connected and are "mutually reinforcing."[94] The study also discusses how gratitude, and its associated humility, may lead to more positive emotional states and subjective well-being.

A series of experiments showed a positive effect of awe on subjective well-being.[95] People who felt awe also reported feeling they had more time, more preference for experiential expenditures than material expenditures, and greater life satisfaction. Experiences that heighten awe may lead to higher levels of life satisfaction and, in turn, higher levels of happiness and subjective well-being.

Mindfulness interventions may also increase subjective well-being in people who mindfully meditate.[96] Being mindful in meditation includes awareness and observation of one's meditation practice, with non-reactive and non-judgmental sentiments during meditation.

National indices of happiness


The creation of various national indices of happiness have expanded the field of positive psychology to a global scale.

In a January 2000 article in American Psychologist, psychologist Ed Diener argued for the creation of a national happiness index in the United States.[97] Such an index could provide measurements of happiness, or subjective well-being, within the United States and across many other countries in the world. Diener argued that national indices would be helpful markers or indicators of population happiness, providing a sense of current ratings and a tracker of happiness across time. Diener proposed that the national index include various sub-measurements of subjective well-being, including "pleasant affect, unpleasant affect, life satisfaction, fulfillment, and more specific states such as stress, affection, trust, and joy."[97]

The first World Happiness Report was initiated by the UN General Assembly in June 2011.

In 2012, the first World Happiness Report was published. The World Happiness Report was initiated by the UN General Assembly in June 2011, when it passed the Bhutanese Resolution.[98] The Bhutanese Resolution called for nations across the world to "give more importance to happiness and well-being in determining how to achieve and measure social and economic development."[98] The data for the World Happiness Reports is collected in partnership with the Gallup World Poll's life evaluations and annual happiness rankings. The World Happiness Report bases its national rankings on how happy constituents believe themselves to be.

The first World Happiness Report, published in 2012, detailed the state of world happiness, the causes of happiness and misery, policy implications from happiness reports, and three case studies of subjective well-being for 1) Bhutan and its Gross National Happiness index, 2) the U.K. Office for National Statistics Experience, and 3) happiness in the member countries within the OECD.[99]

The 2020 World Happiness Report, the eighth in the series of reports, was the first to include happiness rankings of cities across the world, in addition to rankings of 156 countries. The city of Helsinki, Finland was reported as the city with the highest subjective well-being ranking,[100] and the country of Finland was reported as the country with the highest subjective well-being ranking.[101] The 2020 report provided insights on happiness based on environmental conditions, social conditions, urban-rural happiness differentials, and sustainable development.[98] It also provided possible explanations for why Nordic countries have consistently ranked in the top ten happiest countries in the World Happiness Report, such as Nordic countries' high-quality government benefits and protections to its citizens, including welfare benefits and well-operated democratic institutions, as well as social connections, bonding, and trust.[102]

Additional national well-being indices and reported statistics include the Gallup Global Emotions Report,[103] Sharecare Community Well-Being Index,[104] Global Happiness Council's Global Happiness and Well-being Policy Report,[105] Happy Planet Index,[106] OECD Better Life Index,[107] and UN Human Development Reports.[108]

Influences on other academic fields


Positive psychology influenced other academic fields of study and scholarship, notably organizational behavior, education, and psychiatry.

Positive organizational scholarship


Positive organizational scholarship (POS), also referred to as positive organizational behavior (POB), began as an application of positive psychology to the field of organizational behavior. An early use of the term was in Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (2003), edited by Ross School of Business professors Kim S. Cameron, Jane E. Dutton, and Robert E. Quinn.[109] The editors promote "the best of the human condition", such as goodness, compassion, resilience, and positive human potential, as an organizational goal as important as financial success.[109] The goal of POS is to study the factors that create positive work experiences and successful, people-oriented outcomes.

The 2011 volume The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, covers such topics as positive human resource practices, positive organizational practices, and positive leadership and change. It applies positive psychology to the workplace context, covering areas such as positive individual attributes, positive emotions, strengths and virtues, and positive relationships.[110] The editors of that volume define POS this way:

Positive organizational scholarship rigorously seeks to understand what represents the best of the human condition based on scholarly research and theory. Just as positive psychology focuses on exploring optimal individual psychological states rather than pathological ones, organizational scholarship focuses attention on the generative dynamics in organizations that lead to the development of human strength, foster resiliency in employees, enable healing and restoration, and cultivate extraordinary individual and organizational performance. POS emphasizes what elevates individuals and organizations (in addition to what challenges them), what goes right in organizations (in addition to what goes wrong), what is life-giving (in addition to what is problematic or life-depleting), what is experienced as good (in addition to what is objectionable), and what is inspiring (in addition to what is difficult or arduous).[111]



Positive psychology influenced psychiatry and led to more widespread promotion of practices including well-being therapy, positive psychotherapy, and an integration of positive psychology in therapeutic practice.[112]

Benefits of positive influences can be seen in practices like positive psychological interventions (PPIs). It is an intervention designed to promote positive outcomes by implying positive activities such as imposing adaptive personality traits to be praised and encouraged. Research has found that PPIs has the potential to improve medical and psychiatric disorders of individuals with depression[113][114] and suicidal levels.[115] Department of Developmental Services (DDS) did a research on a 52-year-old single gay man with bipolar II disorder and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) with low self-esteem. In addition, there were other focuses of this research: promoting kindness behavior, identifying, and encouraging internal strengths to reach a fulfilling life.[116] PPIs increases the individuality's purpose with constant strengthen on personality traits and behavior positivity.

Psychoanalysis can be used to treat mental illnesses such as depression as it focuses on identifying the conscious and unconscious motivations and behaviors affecting one's life. Treatment using psychoanalysis runs in a longer duration by practicing free association to promote personal growth.[117] Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a common type of psychotherapy in America, focuses on both psychoanalysis and behavioral analysis: psychoanalysts focusing on conscious and unconscious motivations, behaviorists focusing on objectively measured behaviors. Therapy such as exposure therapy helps people with specific aspects of depression, or more specific cases like social phobia.[117]

Positive psychology may assist those recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI).[118] TBI rehabilitation practices rely on bettering the patient's life by getting them to engage (or re-engage) in normal everyday practices, an idea which is related to tenets of positive psychology. While the empirical evidence for positive psychology is limited, positive psychology's focus on small successes, optimism, and prosocial behavior promises to improve the social and emotional well-being of TBI patients.


Positive psychology is a subject of popular books and films, and influences the wellness industry.



Several popular psychology books have been written for a general audience.

Ilona Boniwell's Positive Psychology in a Nutshell provided a summary of the research. According to Boniwell, well-being is related to optimism, extraversion, social connections (i.e., close friendships), being married, having engaging work, religion or spirituality, leisure, good sleep and exercise, social class (through lifestyle differences and better coping methods), and subjective health (what you think about your health).[119] Boniwell writes that well-being is not related to age, physical attractiveness, money (once basic needs are met), gender (women are more often depressed but also more often joyful), educational level, having children, moving to a sunnier climate, crime prevention, housing, and objective health (what doctors say).

Sonja Lyubomirsky's The How of Happiness provides advice on how to improve happiness. According to this book, people should create new habits, seek out new emotions, use variety and timing to prevent hedonic adaptation, and enlist others to support the creation of those new habits.[120] Lyubomirsky recommends twelve happiness activities, including savoring life, learning to forgive, and living in the present.

Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert shares positive psychology research suggesting that people are often poor at predicting what will make them happy and that people are prone to misevaluating the causes of their happiness.[121] He notes that the subjectivity of well-being and happiness often is the most difficult challenge to overcome in predicting future happiness, as our future selves may have different perspectives on life than our current selves.



The film industry noticed positive psychology, and films have spurred new research within positive psychology.

Happy is a full-length documentary film covering positive psychology and neuroscience. It highlights case studies on happiness across diverse cultures and geographies. The film features interviews with notable positive psychologists and scholars, including Gilbert, Diener, Lyubomirsky, and Csikszentmihalyi.[122]

For several years, the Positive Psychology News website included a section on Positive Psychology Movie Awards that highlighted feature films that featured messages of positive psychology.[123]

The VIA Institute has researched positive psychology as represented in feature films. Contemporary and popular films that promote or represent character strengths are the basis for various academic articles.[124]

Wellness industry


The growing popularity and attention given to positive psychology research has influenced industry growth, development, and consumption of products and services meant to cater to wellness and well-being.

According to the Global Wellness Institute, as of 2020, the global wellness economy is valued at US$4.4 trillion;[125] the key sectors of the industry included Nutrition, Personal Care and Beauty, and Physical activity, while the Mental wellness and Public health sectors made up over US$0.5 billion.

Companies highlight happiness and well-being in their marketing strategies. Food and beverage companies such as Coca-Cola[126] and Pocky—whose motto is "Share happiness!"[127]—emphasize happiness in their commercials, branding, and descriptions. CEOs at retail companies such as Zappos have profited by publishing books detailing how they deliver happiness,[128] while Amazon's logo features a dimpled smile.[129]



Many aspects of positive psychology have been criticized.

Reality distortion


In 1988, psychologists Shelley E. Taylor and Jonathan D. Brown co-authored a Psychological Bulletin article that coined the phrase positive illusions.[130] Positive illusions are the cognitive processes people engage in when they self-aggrandize or self-enhance. They are unrealistically positive or self-affirming attitudes that individuals hold about themselves, their position, or their environment. They are attitudes of extreme optimism that endure in the face of facts and real conditions.

Taylor and Brown suggest that positive illusions protect people from negative feedback that they might receive, and this, in turn, preserves their psychological adaptation and subjective well-being. However, later research found that positive illusions and related attitudes lead to psychological maladaptive conditions such as poorer social relationships, expressions of narcissism, and negative workplace outcomes,[131] thus reducing the positive effects that positive illusions have on subjective well-being, overall happiness, and life satisfaction.

Kirk Schneider, editor of the Journal of Humanistic Psychology, pointed to research showing high positivity correlates with positive illusion, which distorts reality. High positivity or flourishing could make one incapable of psychological growth, unable to self-reflect, and prone to holding racial biases. By contrast, negativity, sometimes evidenced in mild to moderate depression, is correlated with less distortion of reality. Therefore, Schneider argues, negativity might play an important role: engaging in conflict and acknowledging appropriate negativity, including certain negative emotions like guilt, might better promote flourishing. Schneider wrote: "perhaps genuine happiness is not something you aim at, but is... a by-product of a life well lived—and a life well lived does not settle on the programmed or neatly calibrated."[132]

Narrow focus


In 2003, Ian Sample noted that "Positive psychologists also stand accused of burying their heads in the sand and ignoring that depressed, even merely unhappy people, have real problems that need dealing with."[133] He quoted Steven Wolin, a clinical psychiatrist at George Washington University, as saying that the study of positive psychology is just a reiteration of older ways of thinking, and that there is not much scientific research to support the efficacy of this method.

Psychological researcher Shelly Gable retorts that positive psychology is just bringing a balance to a side of psychology that is glaringly understudied. She points to imbalances favoring research into negative psychological well-being in cognitive psychology, health psychology, and social psychology.[133]

Psychologist Jack Martin maintains that positive psychology is not unique in its optimistic approach to emotional well-being, stating that other forms of psychology, such as counseling and educational psychology, are also interested in positive human fulfillment.[134] He says while positive psychology pushes for schools to be more student-centered and able to foster positive self-images in children, a lack of focus on self-control may prevent children from making full contributions to society. If positive psychology is not implemented correctly, it can cause more harm than good. This is the case, for example, when interventions in school are coercive (in the sense of being imposed on everyone without regard for the child's reason for negativity) and fail to take each student's context into account.[135]

Role of negativity


Barbara S. Held, a professor at Bowdoin College, argues that positive psychology has faults: negative side effects, negativity within the positive psychology movement, and the division in the field of psychology caused by differing opinions of psychologists on positive psychology. She notes the movement's lack of consistency regarding the role of negativity. She also raises issues with the simplistic approach taken by some psychologists in the application of positive psychology. A "one size fits all" approach is arguably not beneficial; she suggests a need for individual differences to be incorporated into its application.[136] By teaching young people that being confident and optimistic leads to success, when they are unsuccessful they may believe this is because they are insecure or pessimistic. This could lead them to believe that any negative internal thought or feeling they may experience is damaging to their happiness and should be steered clear of completely.[135]

Held prefers the Second Wave Positive Psychology message of embracing the dialectic nature of positive and negative, and questions the need to call it "positive" psychology.[136]

Toxic positivity

Though the concept of unrealistic optimism had already been explored by psychologists at least as early as 1980, the term toxic positivity appeared in J. Halberstam's 2011 The Queer Art of Failure[137] ("...to poke holes in the toxic positivity of contemporary life"). Beginning in about 2019, the term toxic positivity became the subject of a greater number of Internet searches.

One critical response to positive psychology concerns "toxic positivity".[138] Toxic positivity is when people do not fully acknowledge, process, or manage the entire spectrum of human emotion, including anger and sadness.[139] This genre of criticism argues that positive psychology places too much importance on "upbeat thinking, while shunting challenging and difficult experiences to the side."[140] People who engage in a constant chase for positive experiences or states of high subjective well-being may inadvertently stigmatize negative emotional conditions such as depression, or may suppress natural emotional responses, such as sadness, regret, or stress. Furthermore, by not allowing negative emotional states to be experienced, or by suppressing and hiding negative emotional responses, people may experience harmful physical, cardiovascular, and respiratory consequences.[141] Opponents of toxic positivity advocate accepting and fully experiencing negative emotional states.

Methodological and philosophical critiques


Richard Lazarus critiqued positive psychology's methodological and philosophical components. He holds that giving more detail and insight into the positive is not bad, but not at the expense of the negative, because the two (positive and negative) are inseparable. Among his critiques:

  1. Positive psychology's use of correlational and cross-sectional research designs to indicate causality between the movement's ideas and healthy lives may hide other factors and time differences that account for observed differences.
  2. Emotions cannot be categorized dichotomously into positive and negative; emotions are subjective and rich in social/relational meaning. Emotions are fluid, meaning that the context they appear in changes over time. Lazarus states that "all emotions have the potential of being either one or the other, or both, on different occasions, and even on the same occasion when an emotion is experienced by different persons"[142]
  3. Individual differences are neglected in most social science research. Many research designs focus on the statistical significance of the groups while overlooking differences among people.
  4. Social science researchers' tend to not adequately define and measure emotions. Most assessments are quick checklists and do not provide adequate debriefing. Many researchers do not differentiate between fluid emotional states and relatively stable personality traits.

Lazarus holds that positive psychology claims to be new and innovative but the majority of research on stress and coping theory makes many of the same claims as positive psychology. The movement attempts to uplift and reinforce the positive aspects of one's life, but everyone in life experiences stress and hardship. Coping through these events should not be regarded as adapting to failures but as successfully navigating stress, but the movement doesn't hold that perspective.

Another critique of positive psychology is that it has been developed from a Eurocentric worldview. Intersectionality has become a methodological concern regarding studies within Positive Psychology.[143]

A literature review conducted in 2022 noted several criticisms of the area, including lack of conceptual thinking, problematic measurements, poor replication of results, self-isolation from mainstream psychology, decontextualization, and being used for capitalism.[144]

The US Army's Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program

In contract with Seligman's Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania, the United States Army began the Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program in order to address psychological issues among soldiers.

The Comprehensive Soldier Fitness (CSF) program was established in 2008 by then-Chief of Staff of the United States Army, General George W. Casey, Jr., in an effort to address increasing rates of drug abuse, family violence, PTSD, and suicide among soldiers. The Army contracted with Seligman's Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania to supply a program based on the center's Penn Resiliency Program, which was designed for 10- to 14-year-old children.[145] Although Seligman proposed starting with a small-scale pilot-test, General Casey insisted on immediately rolling out the CSF to the entire Army.[146] Interviewed for the journal Monitor on Psychology of the American Psychological Association, Seligman said that "This is the largest study—1.1 million soldiers—psychology has ever been involved in."[147] According to journalist Jesse Singal, "It would become one of the largest mental-health interventions geared at a single population in the history of humanity, and possibly the most expensive."[145]

Some psychologists criticized the CSF for various reasons. Nicholas J.L. Brown wrote: "The idea that techniques that have demonstrated, at best, marginal effects in reducing depressive symptoms in school-age children could also prevent the onset of a condition that is associated with some of the most extreme situations with which humans can be confronted is a remarkable one that does not seem to be backed up by empirical evidence."[148] Stephen Soldz of the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis cited Seligman's acknowledgment that the CSF is a gigantic study rather than a program based on proven techniques, and questioned the ethics of requiring soldiers to participate in research without informed consent.[149] Soldz also criticized the CSF training for trying to build up-beat attitudes toward combat: "Might soldiers who have been trained to resiliently view combat as a growth opportunity be more likely to ignore or under-estimate real dangers, thereby placing themselves, their comrades, or civilians at heightened risk of harm?"[149]

In 2021 the Chronicle of Higher Education carried a debate between Singal and Seligman about whether, with the CSF well into its second decade, there was any solid evidence of its effectiveness. Singal cited studies that, he said, failed to find any measurable benefits from such positive psychology techniques, and he criticized the Army's own reports as methodologically unsound and lacking peer review.[145][150] Seligman said that Singal had misinterpreted the studies and ignored the Army's positive feedback from soldiers, one of whom told Seligman that "if I had had this training years ago, it would have saved my marriage."[151]

See also





  1. ^ "APA Dictionary of Psychology". dictionary.apa.org. Retrieved 2024-06-29.
  2. ^ a b Gable, S. L.; Haidt, J. (2005). "What (and why) is positive psychology?". Review of General Psychology. 9 (2): 103–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103. S2CID 15186098.
  3. ^ Jenkinson, Crispin (2020-05-06). "Quality of Life". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-03-06.
  4. ^ Tal, Ben-Shahar (2007). Happier: Learn the secrets to daily joy and lasting fulfillment. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0071510967. OCLC 176182574.
  5. ^ a b Al Taher, Reham (2015-02-12). "The 5 Founding Fathers and A History of Positive Psychology". Positive Psychology. Retrieved 2022-12-06.
  6. ^ Peterson, Jordan. "Jordan Peterson explains Rogers' concept of 'incongruence'". YouTube.
  7. ^
  8. ^ Nyabul, P.O.; Situma, J.W. (2014). "The Meaning of Eudemonia in Aristotle's Ethics". International Journal of Philosophy and Theology. 2 (3): 65–74.
  9. ^ Le Nguyen, Khoa D.; Lin, Jue; Algoe, Sara B.; Brantley, Mary M.; Kim, Sumi L.; Brantley, Jeffrey; Salzberg, Sharon; Fredrickson, Barbara L. (2019-10-01). "Loving-kindness meditation slows biological aging in novices: Evidence from a 12-week randomized controlled trial". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 108: 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.020. ISSN 0306-4530. PMID 31185369. S2CID 159041646. (Erratum: doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104440, PMID 31526525,  Retraction Watch. If the erratum has been checked and does not affect the cited material, please replace {{erratum|...}} with {{erratum|...|checked=yes}}.)
  10. ^ Day, J.M. (2010). "Religion, spirituality, and positive psychology in adulthood: A developmental view". Journal of Adult Development. 17 (4): 215–229. doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9086-7. S2CID 144563162.
  11. ^ Seligman, Martin E. P.; Steen, Tracy A.; Park, Nansook; Peterson, Christopher (2005). "Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions". American Psychologist. 60 (5): 410–421. CiteSeerX doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410. PMID 16045394. S2CID 6262678.
  12. ^ a b c d Seligman, Martin E. P.; Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2000). "Positive Psychology: An Introduction". American Psychologist. 55 (1): 5–14. CiteSeerX doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5. PMID 11392865. S2CID 14783574.
  13. ^ Crowe, Nicholas J. (2020). Salem Press Encyclopedia.
  14. ^ Sutton, Anna (2020). "Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement". Personality and Individual Differences. 153. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109645. hdl:10289/13365.
  15. ^ Park, Nansook; Peterson, Christopher; Szvarca, Daniel; Vander Molen, Randy J.; Kim, Eric S.; Collon, Kevin (26 September 2014). "Positive Psychology and Physical Health". American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 10 (3). SAGE Publications: 200–206. doi:10.1177/1559827614550277. ISSN 1559-8276. PMC 6124958. PMID 30202275.
  16. ^ Kaufman, Scott Barry (2015-08-02). "Which Character Strengths Are Most Predictive of Well-Being?". Scientific American.
  17. ^ a b Seligman, Martin E.P. "Positive Psychology Center". University of Pennsylvania.
  18. ^
  19. ^ Shesthra, Arjun (December 2016). "Positive psychology: Evolution, philosophical foundations, and present growth". Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. 7 (4): 460–465. ProQuest 1862867466.
  20. ^
  21. ^ Wen, Jin; Shi, Ying-kang; Li, You-ping; Yuan, Ping; Wang, Fang (2012-08-21). "Quality of Life, Physical Diseases, and Psychological Impairment among Survivors 3 Years after Wenchuan Earthquake: A Population Based Survey". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e43081. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...743081W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043081. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3427990. PMID 22937014.
  22. ^ Ackerman, Courtney E. (2018-03-12). "Positive Emotions: A List of 26 Examples + Definition in Psychology". Positive Psychology. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  23. ^ "Happiness and Positive Psychology". AIPC Article Library. 2011-09-08. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  24. ^ a b "Our Mission". Positive Psychology Center | University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  25. ^ a b "Martin Seligman & Positive Psychology". Pursuit of Happiness. Retrieved 2022-04-08.
  26. ^ Peterson, Christopher (2009). "Positive Psychology". Reclaiming Children and Youth. 18 (2): 3–7.
  27. ^ Peterson, Christopher (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-518833-0. OCLC 62089880.
  28. ^ a b c Carr, Alan (2022-02-25), "Positive psychology and wellbeing", Positive Psychology, London: Routledge, pp. 1–29, retrieved 2024-03-15
  29. ^ a b Diener, Ed (2009), "Positive Psychology: Past, Present, and Future", in Lopez, Shane J; Snyder, C.R (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, Oxford University Press, pp. 6–12, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0002, ISBN 9780195187243
  30. ^ Maslow, Abraham H. (1954). "Toward a Positive Psychology". Motivation and Personality (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers. pp. 353–63.
  31. ^ Maslow, Abraham H. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers. p. xxiii. ISBN 978-0-06-044241-5.
  32. ^
  33. ^ a b Seligman, Martin E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-2297-6.
  34. ^ Maslow, Abraham. Motivation and Psychology. p. 354. The science of psychology has been far more successful on the negative than on the positive side. It has revealed to us much about man's shortcomings, his illness, his sins, but little about his potentialities, his virtues, his achievable aspirations, or his full psychological height. It is as if psychology has voluntarily restricted itself to only half its rightful jurisdiction, the darker, meaner half.
  35. ^ a b Compton, William C. (2005). An Introduction to Positive Psychology. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 978-0-534-64453-6.
  36. ^ "Master of Applied Positive Psychology | Penn LPS". www.lps.upenn.edu. Retrieved 2024-01-31.
  37. ^ "Harvard Course on Positive Psychology: Watch 30 Lectures from the University's Extremely Popular Course". Open Culture. 2017-08-15.
  38. ^ "First World Congress on Positive Psychology Kicks Off Today With Talks by Two of the World's Most Renowned Psychologists". Press Release, International Positive Psychology Association. 2009-06-18. Archived from the original on 2012-09-08.
  39. ^ Compton, William C.; Hoffman, Edward (2013). Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Flourishing (2nd ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.[ISBN missing]
  40. ^ Diener, Ed (1984). "Subjective well-being". Psychological Bulletin. 95 (3): 542–575. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542. PMID 6399758.
  41. ^ Tov, William; Diener, Ed (2013). "Subjective Well-Being". In Keith, Kenneth D. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp518. ISBN 9781118339893.
  42. ^ Costa Galinha, Iolanda; Pais-Ribeiro, José Luís (2011). "Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective wellbeing". International Journal of Wellbeing. 2 (1): 34–53. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i1.3. hdl:11144/1892.
  43. ^ Diener, Ed; Suh, Eunkook (2000). Culture and Subjective Well-being. A Bradford Book. p. 4.
  44. ^ David (4 December 2014). "Carol Ryff's Model of Psychological Well-being: The Six Criteria of Well-Being". Living Meanings.
  45. ^ a b Robitschek, Christine; Keyes, Corey L. M. (2009). "Keyes's model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 56 (2): 321–329. doi:10.1037/a0013954.
  46. ^ Keyes, Corey L. M. (2002). "The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 43 (2): 207–222. doi:10.2307/3090197. JSTOR 3090197. PMID 12096700.
  47. ^ a b Joshanloo, Mohsen (2015-10-23). "Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling". Journal of Happiness Studies. 17 (5): 2023–2036. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z. S2CID 16022037.
  48. ^
  49. ^ Levine, Marvin (2000). The Positive Psychology of Buddhism and Yoga (2nd ed.). doi:10.4324/9781410605665. ISBN 9781410605665.
  50. ^ Aristotle. Andronicus (ed.). Nicomachean Ethics.
  51. ^ Schwartz, Barry; Sharpe, Kenneth E. (September 2006). "Practical Wisdom: Aristotle meets Positive Psychology". Journal of Happiness Studies. 7 (3): 377–395. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-3651-y. ISSN 1389-4978. S2CID 14975135.
  52. ^ a b c d Sze, David (2015-06-17). "The Father of Positive Psychology and His Two Theories of Happiness". Huffington Post. Retrieved 2018-02-19.
  53. ^ Wallis, Claudia (2005-01-09). "Science of Happiness: New Research on Mood, Satisfaction". Time. Archived from the original on 2010-11-15. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
  54. ^ Allen, Mark S.; McCarthy, Paul J. (2016-01-02). "Be Happy in your Work: The Role of Positive Psychology in Working with Change and Performance". Journal of Change Management. 16 (1): 55–74. doi:10.1080/14697017.2015.1128471. ISSN 1469-7017. S2CID 147023455.
  55. ^ "The World Question Center 2011". Edge.org. p. 2. Archived from the original on 2011-02-10. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
  56. ^ a b c Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being. New York: Free Press. ISBN 978-1-4391-9076-0.
  57. ^ Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (23 October 2008). "Flow, the secret to happiness". TED.
  58. ^ Cundy, Jaime Booth (2012-10-10). "Other People Matter". Psychology Today.
  59. ^ Lyon, Lindsay (2009-06-24). "Using Positive Psychology in Your Relationships". U.S. News.
  60. ^ Kashen, Dave (2011-09-13). "The Science of a Happy Startup". Archived from the original on 2011-09-24.
  61. ^ a b Peterson, Christopher; Seligman, Martin E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516701-6.
  62. ^ Shryack, J.; Steger, M. F.; Krueger, R. F.; Kallie, C. S. (2010). "The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (6): 714–719. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007. hdl:10818/33195.
  63. ^ Brdr, I.; Kashdan, T.B. (2010). "Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates". Journal of Research in Personality. 44: 151–154. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.
  64. ^ Thagard, Paul (2005). "How to be a successful scientist". In Gorman, M. E.; Tweney, R. D.; Gooding, D. C.; Kincannon, A. P. (eds.). Scientific and technological thinking. Mawah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 159–171.
  65. ^ Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2016). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Joosr Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78567-230-9. OCLC 959933502.
  66. ^ a b Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-016253-5.
  67. ^ Shernoff, David J.; Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2009). "Flow in Schools: Cultivating Engaged Learners and Optimal Learning Environments". In Furlong, Michael J.; Gilman, Richard; Huebner, E. Scott (eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools. Routledge. p. 132. ISBN 978-1-135-59180-9.
  68. ^ a b Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly; Csikszentmihalyi, Isabella Selega (1988). Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34288-0. OCLC 16685308.
  69. ^ Pentti, Selja; Fagerlund, Åse; Nyström, Pär (2019-09-25). "Flourishing families: Effects of a positive psychology intervention on parental flow, engagement, meaning and hope". International Journal of Wellbeing. 9 (4): 79–96. doi:10.5502/ijw.v9i4.1003. ISSN 1179-8602.
  70. ^ Nakamura, Jeanne; Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2014), "The Concept of Flow", Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 239–263, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_16, ISBN 978-94-017-9087-1, S2CID 30035071, retrieved 2023-03-19
  71. ^ Ariani, Dorothea Wahyu (2021-01-11). "How achievement goals affect students' well-being and the relationship model between achievement goals, academic self-efficacy and affect at school". Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 14 (1): 111–134. doi:10.1108/jarhe-08-2020-0273. ISSN 2050-7003. S2CID 234330864.
  72. ^ Asakawa, Kiyoshi (2004). "Flow Experience and Autotelic Personality in Japanese College Students: How do they Experience Challenges in Daily Life?". Journal of Happiness Studies. 5 (2): 123–154. doi:10.1023/b:johs.0000035915.97836.89. ISSN 1389-4978. S2CID 145524455.
  73. ^
  74. ^ Spencer, John (2016). Making Learning Flow: instruction and assessment strategies that empower students to love learning and reach new levels of achievement. Bloomington, Indiana: Solution Tree Press. ISBN 978-1-943874-19-4. OCLC 965738894.
  75. ^ Shernoff, David J.; Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2009). "Flow in Schools: Cultivating Engaged Learners and Optimal Learning Environments". In Gilman, Rich; Huebner, E. Scott; Furlong, Michael (eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools. New York: Routledge. pp. 149–164. doi:10.4324/9780203884089-20. ISBN 978-0-203-88408-9.
  76. ^ Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly; Hunter, Jeremy (2014). "Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling". Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 89–101. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_6. ISBN 978-94-017-9087-1. Retrieved 2022-04-08.
  77. ^ "Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being". Choice Reviews Online. 48 (12). American Library Association. 2011. doi:10.5860/choice.48-7217. ISSN 0009-4978.
  78. ^ a b c d e f Lomas, Tim; Ivtzan, Itai (2016). "Second Wave Positive Psychology: Exploring the Positive–Negative Dialectics of Wellbeing" (PDF). Journal of Happiness Studies. 17 (4): 1753–1768. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9668-y. ISSN 1573-7780. S2CID 59323394.
  79. ^ Wong, Paul T. P. (2011). "Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life". Canadian Psychology. 52 (2): 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0022511.
  80. ^ Ivtzan, Ital; Lomas, Tim; Hefferon, Kate; Worth, Piers (2016). Second Wave Positive Psychology: Embracing the Dark Side of Life. Routledge & CRC Press. ISBN 9781138818668.
  81. ^ a b Wong, Paul T. P. (2019). "Second wave positive psychology's (PP 2.0) contribution to counselling psychology". Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 32 (3–4): 275–284. doi:10.1080/09515070.2019.1671320. S2CID 210584208.
  82. ^ Lomas, Tim; Waters, Lea; Williams, Paige; Oades, Lindsay G.; Kern, Margaret L. (2021-09-03). "Third wave positive psychology: broadening towards complexity". The Journal of Positive Psychology. 16 (5): 660–674. doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1805501. ISSN 1743-9760.
  83. ^ Kern, Margaret L.; Williams, Paige; Spong, Cass; Colla, Rachel; Sharma, Kesh; Downie, Andrea; Taylor, Jessica A.; Sharp, Sonia; Siokou, Christine; Oades, Lindsay G. (2020-11-01). "Systems informed positive psychology". The Journal of Positive Psychology. 15 (6): 705–715. doi:10.1080/17439760.2019.1639799. ISSN 1743-9760.
  84. ^ MBA, Catherine Moore, Psychologist (2020-02-24). "What is Positive Education, and How Can We Apply It? (+PDF)". PositivePsychology.com. Retrieved 2024-03-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  85. ^ Sin, Nancy L.; Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2009). "Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 65 (5): 467–487. doi:10.1002/jclp.20593. PMID 19301241.
  86. ^ Bolier, Linda; Haverman, Merel; Westerhof, Gerben J; Riper, Heleen; Smit, Filip; Bohlmeijer, Ernst (2013). "Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies". BMC Public Health. 13 (1): 119. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-119. PMC 3599475. PMID 23390882.
  87. ^ Hendriks, Tom; Warren, Meg A; Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke; Hassankhan, Aabidien; Graafsma, Tobi; Bohlmeijer, Ernst; de Jong, Joop (2019). "How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being". The Journal of Positive Psychology. 14 (4): 489–501. doi:10.1080/17439760.2018.1484941. S2CID 149574830.
  88. ^ Castellani, Valeria; Perinelli, Enrico; Gerbino, Maria; Caprara, Gian Vittorio (2016-08-01). "Positive orientation and interpersonal styles". Personality and Individual Differences. 98: 229–234. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.048. ISSN 0191-8869.
  89. ^ a b Smith, Bruce W.; Ford, C. Graham; Erickson, Kelly; Guzman, Anne (2020). "The Effects of a Character Strength Focused Positive Psychology Course on Undergraduate Happiness and Well-Being". Journal of Happiness Studies. 22 (1): 343–362. doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00233-9. ISSN 1389-4978. S2CID 214172035.
  90. ^ Ong, Anthony D.; Van Dulmen, Manfred H. M. (2007). Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517218-8. OCLC 61178188.
  91. ^ a b Rich, Grant J. (2017). "The promise of qualitative inquiry for positive psychology: Diversifying methods". The Journal of Positive Psychology. 12 (3): 220–231. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1225119. S2CID 151352247.
  92. ^ Lyubomirsky, Sonja; Sheldon, Kennon M.; Schkade, David (2005). "Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change". Review of General Psychology. 9 (2): 111–131. CiteSeerX doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111. S2CID 6705969.
  93. ^ a b Lyubomirsky, Sonja; Dickerhoof, Rene; Boehm, Julia K.; Sheldon, Kennon M. (2011). "Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: An experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being". Emotion. 11 (2): 391–402. doi:10.1037/a0022575. PMC 4380267. PMID 21500907.
  94. ^ a b Kruse, Elliott; Chancellor, Joseph; Ruberton, Peter M.; Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2014). "An Upward Spiral Between Gratitude and Humility". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 5 (7): 805–814. doi:10.1177/1948550614534700. S2CID 7390929.
  95. ^ Rudd, Melanie; Vohs, Kathleen D.; Aaker, Jennifer (2012). "Awe Expands People's Perception of Time, Alters Decision Making, and Enhances Well-Being". Psychological Science. 23 (10): 1130–1136. CiteSeerX doi:10.1177/0956797612438731. PMID 22886132. S2CID 9159218.
  96. ^ Josefsson, Torbjörn; Larsman, Pernilla; Broberg, Anders G.; Lundh, Lars-Gunnar (2011). "Self-Reported Mindfulness Mediates the Relation Between Meditation Experience and Psychological Well-Being". Mindfulness. 2 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0042-9. S2CID 145232909.
  97. ^ a b Diener, Ed (2000). "Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index". American Psychologist. 55 (1): 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34. PMID 11392863.
  98. ^ a b c "World Happiness Report 2023". World Happiness Report.
  99. ^ Helliwell, John; Layard, Richard; Sachs, Jeffrey, eds. (2012). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University. ISBN 978-0-9968513-0-5. OCLC 946558240.
  100. ^ De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel; Krekel, Christian (2020-03-20). "Cities and Happiness: A Global Ranking and Analysis". World Happiness Report. Retrieved 2020-11-28.
  101. ^ Coffey, Helen (2020-03-20). "Finland crowned world's happiest country for third year running". The Independent. Retrieved 2020-11-28.
  102. ^ Martela, Frank; Greve, Bent; Rothstein, Bo; Saari, Juho (2020-03-20). "The Nordic Exceptionalism: What Explains Why the Nordic Countries Are Constantly Among the Happiest in the World". World Happiness Report. Retrieved 2020-11-28.
  103. ^ "Gallup Global Emotions Report". Gallup.
  104. ^ "Community Well-Being Index". Sharecare. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  105. ^ "Global Happiness Policy Report". Global Council for Happiness and Well-being. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  106. ^ "Happy Planet Index". Happy Planet Index. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  107. ^ "OECD Better Life Index". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  108. ^ "Human Development Reports". United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  109. ^ a b Cameron, Kim; Dutton, Jane; Quinn, Robert E. (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN 978-1-57675-966-0.
  110. ^ Spreitzer, Gretchen M.; Cameron, Kim S., eds. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.001.0001. ISBN 9780199734610.
  111. ^ Cameron, Kim S.; Spreitzer, Gretchen M. (2011). "What is Positive about Positive Organizational Scholarship?". In Spreitzer, Gretchen M.; Cameron, Kim S. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.001.0001. ISBN 9780199734610.
  112. ^ Linley, P. Alex; Joseph, Stephen (2004). Positive Psychology in Practice. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-45906-2.
  113. ^ Seligman, Martin E. P.; Rashid, Tayyab; Parks, Acacia C. (2006). "Positive psychotherapy". The American Psychologist. 61 (8): 774–788. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774. ISSN 0003-066X. PMID 17115810. S2CID 10840428.
  114. ^ Sin, Nancy L.; Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2009). "Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 65 (5): 467–487. doi:10.1002/jclp.20593. ISSN 1097-4679. PMID 19301241.
  115. ^ Huffman, Jeff C.; DuBois, Christina M.; Healy, Brian C.; Boehm, Julia K.; Kashdan, Todd B.; Celano, Christopher M.; Denninger, John W.; Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2014). "Feasibility and utility of positive psychology exercises for suicidal inpatients". General Hospital Psychiatry. 36 (1): 88–94. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.10.006. ISSN 1873-7714. PMID 24230461. S2CID 17205399.
  116. ^ Summers, R. F.; Jeste, D. V. (2018). Positive Psychiatry : A Casebook (1st ed.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. pp. 103–104.
  117. ^ a b Messias, E (2019). From Depression to Happiness : a Positive Psychiatry Prescription for Life after Depression (1st ed.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 36. ISBN 9781527537132.
  118. ^ Mills, Ana L.; Kreutzer, Jeffrey S. (2015). "Theoretical Applications of Positive Psychology to Vocational Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury". Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 26 (1): 20–31. doi:10.1007/s10926-015-9608-z. PMID 26373862. S2CID 19549504.
  119. ^ Boniwell, Ilona (2012). Positive psychology in a nutshell: the science of happiness. UK: McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-335-24721-9. OCLC 816029887.
  120. ^ Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2008). The how of happiness: a scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York: Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-148-6. OCLC 173683624.
  121. ^ Gilbert, Daniel Todd (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: A.A. Knopf. ISBN 978-1-4000-7742-7. OCLC 61362165.
  122. ^ Belic, Roko (2011), Happy, Marci Shimoff, Ed Diener, Richard Davidson, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Emotional Content, Iris Films, Wadi Rum Films
  123. ^ Niemiec, Ryan (2019-04-25). "The Positive Psychology Movie Awards for 2018". Positive Psychology News. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  124. ^ "Positive Psychology Movies and Other Media". VIA Institute on Character.
  125. ^ "Wellness Economy Data Series". Global Wellness Institute. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  126. ^ McCarthy, Jeremy (2013-05-07). "Coca-Cola Really Does Sell Happiness". The Psychology of Wellbeing. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  127. ^ "About". Pocky. Pocky is about sharing happiness with friends, family, coworkers...
  128. ^ Hsieh, Tony (2010). Delivering happiness: a path to profits, passion, and purpose (1st ed.). New York: Business Plus. ISBN 978-0-446-56304-8. OCLC 320191190.
  129. ^ Rogoza, Roman (2012-08-22). "Arrow or Smile: What Message Is Hidden in Amazon Logo?". Logaster Blog. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  130. ^ Taylor, Shelley E.; Brown, Jonathon D. (1988). "Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health". Psychological Bulletin. 103 (2): 193–210. CiteSeerX doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193. PMID 3283814. S2CID 762759.
  131. ^ Luksch, Nancy (2010-02-27). "Positive Illusions and Positive Psychology: Do Positive Illusions Foster Mental Health?". PositivePsychology.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2017-03-31. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  132. ^ Schneider, Kirk J. (2010-11-29). "Toward a Humanistic Positive Psychology: Why Can't We Just Get Along?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  133. ^ a b Sample, Ian (2003-11-19). "How to be happy". The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-06-21.
  134. ^ Martin, Jack (2006). "Self Research in Educational Psychology: A Cautionary Tale of Positive Psychology in Action". The Journal of Psychology. 140 (4). Informa UK Limited: 307–316. doi:10.3200/jrlp.140.4.307-316. ISSN 0022-3980. PMID 16967738. S2CID 31941258.
  135. ^ a b Ciarrochi, Joseph; Atkins, Paul W. B.; Hayes, Louise L.; Sahdra, Baljinder K.; Parker, Philip (2016). "Contextual Positive Psychology: Policy Recommendations for Implementing Positive Psychology into Schools". Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 1561. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01561. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 5056194. PMID 27777564.
  136. ^ a b Held, Barbara S. (2004). "The Negative Side of Positive Psychology". Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 44 (1): 9–46. doi:10.1177/0022167803259645. ISSN 0022-1678. S2CID 146703182.
  137. ^ Lecompte-Van Poucke, Margo (25 January 2022). "'You got this!': A critical discourse analysis of toxic positivity as a discursive construct on Facebook". Applied Corpus Linguistics. 2 (1): 100015. doi:10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100015. S2CID 246339733.
  138. ^
  139. ^ Lukin, Konstantin. "Toxic Positivity: Don't Always Look on the Bright Side". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  140. ^ Smith, Jen Rose (17 September 2020). "When does a good attitude become toxic positivity?". CNN. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  141. ^
    • Villines, Zawn (31 March 2021). Johnson, Jacquelyn (ed.). "What to know about toxic positivity". Medical News Today.
    • Gross, J. J.; Levenson, R. W. (1997). "Hiding feelings: the acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 106 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.106.1.95. PMID 9103721.
    • Campbell-Sills, Laura; Barlow, David H.; Brown, Timothy A.; Hofmann, Stefan G. (2006). "Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders". Behaviour Research and Therapy. 44 (9): 1251–1263. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.001. PMID 16300723.
  142. ^ Lazarus, Richard S. (2003). "Does the Positive Psychology Movement Have Legs?". Psychological Inquiry. 14 (2): 93–109. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1402_02. ISSN 1047-840X. JSTOR 1449813. S2CID 52037670.
  143. ^ Sanders, Christopher A.; Rose, Hope; Booker, Jordan A.; King, Laura A. (2023-01-02). "Claiming the role of positive psychology in the fight against prejudice". The Journal of Positive Psychology. 18 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/17439760.2021.2012342. ISSN 1743-9760. S2CID 245346579.
  144. ^ van Zyl, L. E.; Gaffaney, J.; van der Vaart, L.; Dik, B. J.; Donaldson, S.I. (2023). "The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: A systematic review". The Journal of Positive Psychology: 1–30. doi:10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956.
  145. ^ a b c Singal, Jesse (2021-06-07). "Positive Psychology Goes to War". Retrieved July 25, 2021.
  146. ^ Seligman, Martin E. P. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being. Simon & Schuster. p. 163. ISBN 9781439190753.
  147. ^ Novotney, Amy (December 2009). "Strong in mind and body". Retrieved July 25, 2021.
  148. ^ Brown, Nicholas J. L. (2014). "A critical examination of the US Army's Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program". The Winnower. 2.
  149. ^ a b Soldz, Stephen (2011-03-24). "The Dark Side of 'Comprehensive Soldier Fitness'". The American Psychologist. 66 (7): 643–44, discussion 646–47. doi:10.1037/a0025272. PMID 21967209.
  150. ^ Singal, Jesse (2021-07-22). "Magical Thinking on Positive Psychology: The field's founder can't see past his own hype". Retrieved July 25, 2021.
  151. ^ Seligman, Martin E. P. (2021-07-14). "Effectiveness of Positive Psychology: Setting the record straight". Retrieved July 25, 2021.

Further reading