Jump to content

Precomposed character

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sneftel (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 21 March 2015 (Undid revision 652776200 by PiotrGrochowski000 (talk) - composing characters across tag boundaries is nonstandard, and not supported by some renderers). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A precomposed character (alternatively composite character or decomposable character) is a Unicode entity that can be defined as a sequence of one or more other characters. A precomposed character may typically represent a letter with a diacritical mark, such as é (Latin small letter e with acute accent). Technically, é (U+00E9) is a character that can be decomposed into an equivalent string of the base letter e (U+0065) and combining acute accent (U+0301). Similarly, ligatures are precompositions of their constituent letters or graphemes.

Precomposed characters are the legacy solution for representing many special letters in various character sets. In Unicode they are included primarily to aid computer systems with incomplete Unicode support, where equivalent decomposed characters may render incorrectly.

Comparing precomposed and decomposed characters

In the following example, there is a common Swedish surname Åström written in the two alternative methods, the first one with a precomposed Å (U+00C5) and ö (U+00F6), and the second one using a decomposed base letter A (U+0041) with a combining ring above (U+030A) and an o (U+006F) with a combining diaeresis (U+0308).

  1. Åström (U+00C5 U+0073 U+0074 U+0072 U+00F6 U+006D)
  2. Åström (U+0041 U+030A U+0073 U+0074 U+0072 U+006F U+0308 U+006D)

Except for the different colors, the two solutions are equivalent and should render identically. In practice, however, some Unicode implementations still have difficulties with decomposed characters. In the worst case, combining diacritics may be disregarded or rendered as unrecognized characters after their base letters, as they are not included in all fonts. To overcome the problems, some applications may simply attempt to replace the decomposed characters with the equivalent precomposed characters.

With an incomplete font, however, precomposed characters may also be problematic – especially if they are more exotic, as in the following example (showing the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European word for "dog"):

  1. ḱṷṓn (U+1E31 U+1E77 U+1E53 U+006E)
  2. ḱṷṓn (U+006B U+0301 U+0075 U+032D U+006F U+0304 U+0301 U+006E)

In some situations, the precomposed green k, u and o with diacritics may render as unrecognized characters, or their typographical appearance may be very different from the final letter n with no diacritic. On the second line, the base letters should at least render correctly even if the combining diacritics could not be recognized.

OpenType has the ccmp "feature tag" to define glyphs that are compositions or decompositions involving combining characters.

Chinese characters

In theory, most Chinese characters as encoded by Han unification and similar schemes could be treated as precomposed characters, since they can be reduced (decomposed) to their constituent strokes and ideograph descriptions with Chinese character description languages, though Unicode does not take this approach that would certainly be on the cutting edge of text storage and layout. Such an approach could potentially reduce the number of characters in the character set from tens of thousands to just a few hundred. On the other hand, a character set encoded in this way would also produce documents that were tenfold larger in bytes to represent the same characters as Unicode.

See also

Sources