Jump to content

User talk:205.215.177.151

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

May 2008

[edit]
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Student, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Student was changed by 205.215.177.151 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-28T18:43:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Your recent edit to Student (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Shaquille O'Neal. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Molar (tooth), did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

December 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to MPLS VPN has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

January 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pop-Tarts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fable II. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NHRHS2010 |  Talk to me  20:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fable II. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rror (talk) 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Addoow. Alansohn (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 16:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wood-burning stove, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wood-burning stove was changed by 205.215.177.151 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-12T18:55:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


March 2009

[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Talk:Reno 911!. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. BigHairRef | Talk 19:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Hominy worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 17:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Hominy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to African American history. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Afrika Bambaataa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 17:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page El Sombrerón worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Until It Sleeps TalkContribs 13:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


November 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Los Lobos has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Rrburke(talk) 15:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


December 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page History of McDonald's has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February7 2009

[edit]

[1] Grow up.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


March 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Homo habilis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 20:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Slavery in the United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 15:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:205.215.177.151, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. WackyWace talk 15:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


October 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Discipline, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 15:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 20:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Religion in the Inca Empire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The recent edit you made to Religion in the Inca Empire constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in the Inca Empire, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. →GƒoleyFour18:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Religion in the Inca Empire, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.


The recent edit you made to Religion in the Inca Empire constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 18:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Religion in the Inca Empire. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 18:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Geneva Accord, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Geneva Accord was changed by 205.215.177.151 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955269 on 2011-01-11T20:19:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mexican–American War, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in the Inca Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.


June 2011

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. --The Σ talkcontribs 05:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


December 2011

[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of cancer types, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


January 2012

[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Life Time Fitness, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Life Time Fitness with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Life Time Fitness with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anti-Mexican sentiment, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


February 2012

[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of Facebook, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of songs banned by the BBC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to No Child Left Behind Act, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:No Child Left Behind Act with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


March 2012

[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oxygen sensor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Political party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.



April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aryan Nations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. EWikistTalk 19:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


September 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


October 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Tiggerjay. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mate (beverage), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tiggerjay (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mate (beverage). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.


Hello, I'm James086. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Brake fluid, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086Talk 17:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of Mexico, you may be blocked from editing. -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 15:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


January 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Super48paul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ireland because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! strange island: pen island?! Super48paul (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Magan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.


April 2013

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at August 16. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Satori Son 16:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dan653. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 21 (number)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dan653 (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GnomeSweetGnome. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yu Darvish, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Allkpop. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SemiHypercube. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of brown dwarfs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. SemiHypercube (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.