User talk:AryKun/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 26
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Tree_of_life_by_Haeckel.jpg/100px-Tree_of_life_by_Haeckel.jpg)
- January and February 2024—Issue 026
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
|
News at a glance |
|
January DYKs |
|
February DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
GAN
Hey Ary, notice you snagged a bunch of GANs today. I'm online the rest of the afternoon and if you are able, I'd love to knock the one out for Hypericum x inodorum. I can respond to comments quickly and get right to editing. I'm getting really close to a GT and am anxious to get over the finish line. Thanks! Fritzmann (message me) 19:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah sure, I'll do it in a couple of hours when I finish up some irl work. AryKun (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
- Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
- Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
- Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
- Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
- Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
- Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
- Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
- Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
- Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
- Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
- Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
- Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
- Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
- Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
- Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
- Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
- Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for White-winged tapaculo
On 28 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article White-winged tapaculo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Scytalopus krabbei is named after Niels Krabbe, who discovered seven other species in its genus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/White-winged tapaculo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, White-winged tapaculo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Meratus blue flycatcher
On 30 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meratus blue flycatcher, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only six years after its 2016 discovery, the Meratus blue flycatcher (pictured) was found being sold in Indonesian songbird markets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meratus blue flycatcher. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Meratus blue flycatcher), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
No hard feelings
Hey, just dropping a quick note to let you no I have no hard feelings about the revert on the honey badger article. I won't argue, but I disagree about the significance of such things. Similar "In popular culture" references are added to articles all the time. They may not be "important," but they're interesting and add dimension to the main topic without detracting. I went to read the article about honey badgers because of the YouTube video, and I was very surprised that there was no mention of it in the article. So that's why I added it. No big deal, though. Win some, lose some and all that. :) Yesthatbruce (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- In popular culture sections are discouraged by MOS precisely because they attract immense amounts of trivia that really isn't relevant at all to the topic. Articles are for notable information on a topic, not everything that's interesting. There's a dozen videos on YT about honey badgers with over 30 million views, and none of them are at all notable because YT is a platform where random videos of a tuna being cut in half get that many views. Trivia sections also do detract from articles; since there's no criteria for exclusion once you start adding non-notable stuff, they become those unmaintainable lists that drown out the actually useful parts of an article. AryKun (talk) 06:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha. Thanks for the explication; much appreciated. I'll heed going forward. Yesthatbruce (talk) 19:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Your WikiCup submission: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1989/archive1
Hi AryKun, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You submitted Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1989/archive1 for FLCR points in the WikiCup a few weeks ago. I apologize for not letting you know earlier, but per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, this review does not seem like it's long enough to be eligible for points. I know this may be disappointing, especially if you did conduct an in-depth review and found no issues, but this is done to prevent people from submitting cursory reviews.
In the future, if you don't find any issues in an FLC, it might be best to list how the list complies with the Wikipedia:Featured list criteria. Even if it's only a single paragraph, such a review would qualify for points. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar | |
Thank you for participating in the March 2024 GA backlog drive. Your commendable contributions (30 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC) |
WikiCup 2024 April newsletter
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Black-headed tailorbird
On 23 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black-headed tailorbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the color of a black-headed tailorbird's throat was thought to depend on sex, but later turned out to depend on age? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black-headed tailorbird. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black-headed tailorbird), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Sorry!
Sorry for not catching your QPQ at the DYK nomination. Thank you for alerting me, and great work on the article! SupremeLordBagel (talk to me) 23:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
- Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
- Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
- Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
- Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
- Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
- Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
- Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
- Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Tree_of_life_by_Haeckel.jpg/100px-Tree_of_life_by_Haeckel.jpg)
- March and April 2024—Issue 027
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
News at a glance |
|
March DYKs |
|
April DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Horned sungem
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Horned sungem. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When you can clearly see that I was removing the template intentionally and gave a reason for it, why drop pointless templates on my talk? AryKun (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The key word is "valid". The feeling of a single individual about whether said maintenance is needed is not a valid reason. — Smjg (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maintenance templates are very much added when someone feels that the article needs them and removed when someone feels that it does not. If these two people happen to disagree, they discuss it on the talk page, not plaster Welcome to Wikipedia templates on each others talks. AryKun (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The key word is "valid". The feeling of a single individual about whether said maintenance is needed is not a valid reason. — Smjg (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Oophaga solanensis
On 15 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oophaga solanensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oophaga solanensis frogs can be bought for $3 in their native Colombia and sold for up to $1,000 overseas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oophaga solanensis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oophaga solanensis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Great cuckoo-dove
Editor experience invitation
Hi AryKun :) I see that you're currently on a wikibreak (I hope to see you back eventually) but when you have the time, would you like to chip in here? Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 04:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the DCWC!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Developing_Countries_WikiContest_map.svg/260px-Developing_Countries_WikiContest_map.svg.png)
Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, AryKun! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:
- Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
- Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
- Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
- New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
- Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!
On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Reminder: GA backlog drive
Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of July. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Great cuckoo-dove at TFA
Is this a good time for TFA? How about July 24? - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, any date works for me. AryKun (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Now on the 25th. - Dank (push to talk) 18:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
- Thank you today for Great cuckoo-dove, introduced: "It's somewhat better studied than most island species, but still pretty poorly-known; as always, the article covers pretty much everything ever written about the bird and is probably the most comprehensive resource on or off the web."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Azure-shouldered tanager
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Azure-shouldered tanager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 16:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sumatran green pigeon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sumatran green pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oophaga solanensis
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oophaga solanensis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meratus blue flycatcher
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Meratus blue flycatcher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black-headed tailorbird
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black-headed tailorbird you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black-headed tailorbird
The article Black-headed tailorbird you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black-headed tailorbird and Talk:Black-headed tailorbird/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meratus blue flycatcher
The article Meratus blue flycatcher you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Meratus blue flycatcher and Talk:Meratus blue flycatcher/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 12:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sumatran green pigeon
The article Sumatran green pigeon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sumatran green pigeon and Talk:Sumatran green pigeon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black imperial pigeon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black imperial pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meratus white-eye
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Meratus white-eye you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oophaga solanensis
The article Oophaga solanensis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oophaga solanensis and Talk:Oophaga solanensis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Azure-shouldered tanager
The article Azure-shouldered tanager you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Azure-shouldered tanager and Talk:Azure-shouldered tanager/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 00:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
DCWC August update
The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:
Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.
Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)