User talk:Avaya1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Donald Trump[edit]

Hello,

I did not remove the sentence, but relocated it to the foreign policy section. --Mathmensch (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your deletion of the comment of Donald Trump regarding black people[edit]

Hello Avaya1,

I have moved what you posted on my talk page to the talk page of the Donald Trump article. Please respond there. --Mathmensch (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

I am talking about this action of yours. --Mathmensch (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
By the way: If you don't react to the statement within one day, I will revert your edit. I strongly object that someone delays the discussion to the infinite, while the American people are shielded from an information which is of superior importance to them. --Mathmensch (talk) 17:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

What Wikipedia is not[edit]

In the summary line of this edit, you wrote that, I quote, 'it [Wikipedia] is to present his [Donald Trump's] views'. This is not the case. See Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion --Mathmensch's talk (They are innocent!) 17:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:OWN reminder[edit]

This edit with the edit summary "I created and wrote the whole article" just says: WP:OWN. Debresser (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


Warning about 1RR on Israeli-Arab conflict articles[edit]

All articles related to the Israeli-Arab conflict are subject to a 1RR limitation, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Arab-Israeli_Arbitration_Enforcement . Your latest edits on 2006 Lebanon War broke 1RR. If you continue this, you may be blocked from editing. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 20:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)