User talk:Emma Caroline/Archives/2012/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Emma Caroline. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 23:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
What's with all the hate? My contributions are valid. Have you nothing better to do than hover over every activity of mine?
[[1]] ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valcothegreat (talk • contribs) 19:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](http://sunnysblogpost.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/areyounotentertained.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks!
Thanks for reverting some IP editor's vandalism to my userpage. --L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome! WikiPuppies! (bark) 19:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
My user page
Thanks for stepping in to fix things at my user page. I didn't realise that they'd ranted there also. - Sitush (talk) 20:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome. WikiPuppies! (bark) 20:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
See
Pestering people with 3rr warnings for putting stuff right is why people are leaving Wikipedia. You've got a seasoned user saying "Hey, that's now they are credited" and putting it right, and an IP saying "screw that", and you're posting warnings on my page. And now I can't fix it because I can't edit anymore. Yay! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- First of all, you are not blocked - otherwise you wouldn't have been able to tell me that you couldn't fix it. Second of all, you're both at 3RR - why not follow the BRD cycle and discuss it, instead of edit-warring until you're both blocked by an administrator? WikiPuppies! (bark) 18:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- I know I'm not blocked, I was saying I cannot edit further without risking being blocked. It is impractical to hold a discussion over every minor conflict and impossible to make a bold edit in this case that isn't just undoing the edit. Sometimes people are just clearly wrong without explicitly vandalising, and unwilling to listen to reason. That I can be putting something back to a correct state with evidence to back it up and be cited for 3RR is a joke and I'm understanding why so many editors are leaving. It shouldn't be a hassle to do the right thing in a voluntary project. In the future it seems like it would be more beneficial to leave these periphery articles outside the scope of my watchlist incorrect, and they can remain that way to contribute to the perception that Wikipedia information is unreliable and should not be trusted. At least 3RR won't be violated then. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- What is interesting to me is you both think that you're right - which is a common reason for 3RR violations. By placing the warnings, I was simply trying to avoid the outcome I thought I saw coming: both of you being blocked for edit-warring. WikiPuppies! (bark) 19:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- I know I'm not blocked, I was saying I cannot edit further without risking being blocked. It is impractical to hold a discussion over every minor conflict and impossible to make a bold edit in this case that isn't just undoing the edit. Sometimes people are just clearly wrong without explicitly vandalising, and unwilling to listen to reason. That I can be putting something back to a correct state with evidence to back it up and be cited for 3RR is a joke and I'm understanding why so many editors are leaving. It shouldn't be a hassle to do the right thing in a voluntary project. In the future it seems like it would be more beneficial to leave these periphery articles outside the scope of my watchlist incorrect, and they can remain that way to contribute to the perception that Wikipedia information is unreliable and should not be trusted. At least 3RR won't be violated then. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Hell's Kitchen US Season 11
Wikipedia is not a bureracracy. If you had stopped and looked at the page before declining my CSD you would have seen that the page was a malformed copy paste from the current season's page by an IP address. Now we're going to have to demonstrate a longer path to remove this completeley unsourced speculation. It's entirely possible that Chef Ramsay could decide to not do any more seasons. In addition we've never started a season article untill the new contestants/dates are announced. Hasteur (talk) 20:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oops. Sorry about that. WikiPuppies! (bark) 20:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases