Jump to content

User talk:Missvain/Archive 37

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 30←Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37

Amy Tan Award

Amy Tan Award
Thank you for participating in the First Annual Litquake Edit-a-thon on October 11, 2014 in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Your content contributions and community collaboration helped make the event a success, and are appreciated! Rosiestep (talk) 22:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I was really sorry to read about what you have gone through. Just wanted to say that I consider you a fine editor and a good colleague here on wikipedia, and I hope things will work out for you and your situation improves soon. Incidentally I speak from experience when I say that not being a sysop after being one is actually really liberating, and can dramatically increase one's enjoyment from editing.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 16:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Completely uninvolved comment

Hey Sarah! So, it looks like you're kinda in a shitty situation, and that really sucks - I'm sorry for that. You mentioned in the Arb case If people want to remove my administrative rights that's fine. I can live with that.. What I would suggest is maybe a reconfirmation RfA, or if you're not attached to the admin bit, voluntarily giving them up. That seems to be the scope of the case and while it currently looks like it's going to be refused - this could help completely avoid this or other avenues that interested individuals may pursue. I don't want to see that, and I think you'd rather just go back to a quiet environment. Just some food for thought, virtual hugs, and wikilove. -- Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the ArbCom request

The Purple Star The Purple Star
I honestly cannot think of a good reason for the recent ArbCom request, and sincerely hope that this example of what I consider ridiculous stupidity does not leave too strong of an impact on you personally or on your editing here. John Carter (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Please accept this barnstar in recognition of your resilience and persistence on and off-wiki. I know you have a long history in helping to make our online community more inclusive and welcoming to contributors that are open about their gender, sexuality, and celebrate the value of experience and viewpoints they bring to this project. Fæ (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Missvain RFAR

The committee has voted to decline this case request. Given the nature of the request, my view was that the decision to reject it needed actioned as urgently as possible. Although I am an arbitrator, I have therefore performed the clerks' function in this matter by removing the case request so that it is delisted from the arbitration request page as speedily as possible. It could have been a number of days before a clerk became available to remove the case request, and given your statement at the requests page I did not consider this acceptable. This is both an explanatory note and also the mandatory notice that needs served to parties when RFARs are declined. A copy of the declined request is available here. Yours, AGK [•] 23:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

A good result. What a nasty waste of electrons that was. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 05:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your Teahouse invite

Hallo Sarah Strietch / MissVain

Thanks for your Teahouse invitation. I used to edit Wikipedia several suns ago but left because of all the nasty men here, and can't get back into my old account because I lost my email ID along with the domain name in 2012.

Yesterday I created a fairly well researched and sourced article for this amazing Indian feminist Anny Kohli, and was working on it when User:Secret deleted it silently and now refuses to discuss it.

Since Wikipedia has changed considerably since I was here, and its even more hostile to female editors and female article subjects than before, what do you suggest can be done ? Indohispano (talk) 11:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia genealogy project

Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to this discussion. And apologies if I have made this request before. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Good work on the Ferguson article! — Keithbob • Talk • 17:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2014



Headlines
  • Australia and New Zealand report: ALIA partnership goes countrywide
  • Belgium report: Workshops for collection holders across Europe; Founding event of Wikimedia Belgium; Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium & Luxembourg; Plantin-Moretus Museum; Edit-a-thon at faculty library in Ghent University; Image donation UGentMemorie; Upcoming activities
  • France report: Wiki Loves Monuments; mass upload; Musée de Bretagne
  • Germany report: Facts, fun and free content
  • Ireland report: Ada Lovelace day in Dublin
  • Italy report: National Library Conference; Wiki Loves Monuments; Archaeological Open Data; BEIC
  • Netherlands report: Video challenge; Wikidata workshop and hackathon; Wikipedia courses in libraries; WWII editathon
  • Norway report: Edit-a-thon far north at the Museum of Nordland (Nordlandsmuseet)
  • Spain report: Picasso, first Galipedia edit-a-thon, course in Biblioteca Reina Sofía and free portraits
  • South Africa report: Wiki Loves GLAMs, Cape Town
  • Sweden report: Use, reuse and contributions back and forth
  • UK report: Medals, maps and multilingual marvels
  • Special story: ORCID identifiers
  • Open Access report: Open proposal: Wikidata for Research; Open Access signalling
  • Tool testing report: Tools for references, images, video, file usage; Popular Pages
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Thanks for Reviewing

Thanks for reviewing draft in my sandbox. Understand that there are lines in the Background section which were directly picked from the NGO's website. I will be revising the article as suggested.Yndesai (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Just revised and resubmitted the article. Yndesai (talk) 07:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Missvain, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

We haven't talked much other than the odd AfC thread, but of all the prolific Wikipedians, I think you deserve more than most to have a very happy and peaceful Christmas amongst your family and friends. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Missvain, not that often I come across an Admin I haven't 'seen', heard of, 'met' with 112k or so edits!
I saw you making a possibly vain attempt to get 62.25.109.197 to preview their edits. I templated them re edit summaries, but maybe I should have looked at exactly what they are doing first. I think anyone who can add 11 info-boxes to pages in under an hour is a real asset! It also looks like they started at A and are going to go through to Z wherever an infobox has been requested. They are just powering along! It's amazing, maybe they are a bot!?⊕ 220 of Borg 15:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi User:220 of Borg! Thanks for coming by :) I try to keep a low profile these days. Yes - messy infobox but I'll take messy and "good faith" contributions versus trolling and vandalism any day from an IP. Pretty impressive contributions - let's hope they keep it up! Happy Holidays :) Missvain (talk) 21:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Messy? I didn't really notice. Info boxes aren't really my 'thing'. But I know why I thought I 'hadn't' come across 'you'? I think I recognised the Drama Llama. ӂ 220 of Borg 04:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing

Missvain Season's greetings.

Hope you are enjoying the Christmas. Thought to ping you since my earlier message got archieved.

You had reviewed my Draft on Nature Club Surat and provided valuable inputs. I have revised the draft and thought you could visit it again. Yndesai (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Still want your name on Teahouse invites?

Hi Sarah! Back in the day, as you know doubt remember, you agreed to have your name attached to some of the daily Teahouse invites sent by HostBot. Are you still interested in having your name included in some of these invites? If not, I'm happy to remove your name from the list. Hope all is well in your world :) Cheers, - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 00:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey Jonathan ! It's cool to keep using it, as long as it's updated to my current username, Missvain :) Missvain (talk) 01:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Will do! Thanks, Sarah. - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 16:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:Co-op

Hey Missvain. (Note: This message might feel a little familiar from your Teahouse-building days. :P) A small team of us are building a new mentorship space called the the Co-op, and we are looking for mentors who are interested in teaching one or two editors. We plan to run a pilot in late January for about one month. The idea is that mentors will be doing one-on-one teaching based on how an editor wants to contribute, and it's not some huge commitment to teach or learn comprehensively about Wikipedia. We also want to make to easier for new editors to find mentors as well. You have extensive experience working with new editors, and personally, I think your enthusiasm for this kind of work is contagious, and it's pretty great. If you're interested, feel free to sign up here and peruse, make suggestions, and ask questions about the discussion we're having about how Co-op will work. Thanks a bunch (and Happy New Year!), I, JethroBT drop me a line 04:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Missvain,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Happy New Year Missvain!

Happy New Year!

Missvain,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 10:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.
Sent using mass message sender. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from User:Northamerica1000/Mailing list.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GSCopyPro

Hello Missvain. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "GSCopyPro".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GSCopyPro}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

02:21:03, 3 January 2015 review of submission by 104.55.170.242


104.55.170.242 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


I would like to know why the article was rejected. What can I change? I personally love the music of Ms. Lindsley and would like more people to know about her but I want to know what to change. Is it content? Is it references?

Ms. Fembot Edit-a-Thon

This doesn't belong in article space as it isn't an "article". It should be moved to Wikipedia:Project namespace. Bgwhite (talk) 08:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, it is obviously not an article and this is the first time in whenever that i erred at putting an event in the article namespace. If you haven't moved it, then I will. Thanks Missvain (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem. I do mistakes everyday. I didn't know where exactly to move it. For example, standalone or under a WikiProject. Bgwhite (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2014



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

DNB Missing women

I didn't find this edit of yours helpful. They are not "random women mentioned in articles", so much as women listed in DNB indices on which our DNB Epitome pages (example) are based.

The convention is, if they have an article, give them a tick. If they do not, either leave them alone or, as yo did else where, explain why they fail GNG.

Please think it through. I'm spending long hours fishing these people out so that we can consider them. You're coming along and throwing my work away with a glib comment. Not happy. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

In the hope of being "good cop".... can I thank you for your very recent edit. We are trying to get every woman in the ODNB "done", this means pulling some back from obscurity, as just being mentioned, to a more equitable place. However in some cases there is just not enough to give them a decent stub. In this case we are crossing them - so thanks for doing that one. But we have found some women who were hardly mentioned but are actually key. Lady Harriet Mary Montagu is the ODNB and its her husband (the government minister!) who is the second fiddle in the article. Oh and personally ..... very pleased to see you here. Do help, we'd be pleased to see you. Victuallers (talk) 13:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I knew I'd wake up for to this! I have been working on that list for years, I just take breaks, so it's not like I'm a clueless woman who has never done any work and is unfamiliar with the project :) I just think it's strange when a subject, regardless of gender, who is mentioned in an source (like um, one small paragraph in a spouse's entry), is considered notable enough for their own Wikipedia article. I fear that even if an article is made...someone's going to nominate it from deletion (from personal experience). I was unable to find any reliable secondary sources to back up why someone who is mentioned should get a Wikipedia article of their own. But, here I go again - a leading person who fights against the gender gap and has written thousands of articles about women (including some OD) trying to keep women down from having articles in Wikipedia ;) Missvain (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Lucretia Bradshaw ... I've just found Betterton's History of the English Stage online, it looks from the ODNB entry as if we ought to be able to put together a short stub for her - but not right now, just going out. Later. Seems a little challenge to take up. PamD 18:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, there's a stub now at Lucretia Bradshaw. Not a lot, but scope for expansion. And now I really must get on with sorting out my late mother's paperwork - it's so much more fun playing around in the encyclopedia! PamD 13:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women (cisgender or trans-woman, regardless of sexual orientation) only. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lazy Creek Vineyards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

128.164.20.229 (talk · contribs) added the confused. I simply formatted and added the template. 128.164.20.229 deserves the credit! Both Arthur M. Sackler Gallery and Arthur M. Sackler Museum Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Smithsonian Institution Archives related, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:ORPHAN

Hello Sarah, long time no talk. How are you? I think you have changed your username. Anyway, as you are a participant of WP:WikiProject Orphanage so I want your opinion about another backlog drive. The last backlog drive was happened an year ago in 2014. The number of orphan articles is huge so I want to start a backlog drive (again). This time the aim will be to start de-orphaning from the oldest months. What you say? Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I think that's a great idea Jim! Barnstar or an award is nice (I like that better than competitions, frankly) if you give people XX amount of articles to de-orphan. I will surely participate and help spread the word :) Missvain (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Also - might be a good idea to make a "how to" guide, if an easy to understand (i.e. understandable by n00bs) - then we can promote it to new editors via social media, etc. Missvain (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I like that idea of giving an award. I have a plan: Let the total number of participants be 50 (for example). Now we will divide this 50 editors into groups. 10 editors in a group that means now there are 5 groups each consisting of 10 editors. Now we will give each group a Category. For example: We will give Category:Orphaned articles from August 2008 to group A. Now members of this group will de-orphan only those articles listed in that category. The group that de-orphans the most number of articles will get an award and every participant of that group will get a special barnstar. How will we determine that which group de-orphaned the most number of articles? - Before starting the Backlog drive we will note how many articles are there in every particular category. For example: As of today, there are 323 articles listed in the August 2008 category. After the backlog drive finishes we will subtract the number of the current number of articles from the original number of articles and like this we will determine how many articles where de-orphaned by a single group. The group that de-orphans the most articles wins the award and the winner participants will be mentioned in the Signpost. What you say about this idea? Technical 13 has also created a script to help de-orphaners? I hope the script is ready by now. BTW Sarah I would be happy if you serve as the coordinator of this backlog drive. Oh, yes, I will create a "how to" guide after I hear your opinion about the new backlog drive system. Thank you. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  • The generic script for this works, I just haven't head time to refine it to acknowledge lists, DAB pages etc. I'm sure it wuodl still be helpful but won't do as much work for anyone as i plan it to in the future. Maybe a few people using it to assist for this drive will give me a little more feedback that will be very helpful in development for future use. The script's documentation is located on User:Technical 13/Scripts/OrphanStatus and you will see a todo list there for things that I still intend to work on and how to use the script. Happy deOrphaning! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 12:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like you guys have some great plans. Thanks for the offer, but, i'm so swamped with my professional and personal life that I can't facilitate or coordinate anything on wiki right now. I will participate though when I do have free time to edit :) Missvain (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captain D'Agoust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palais de Justice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:World Digital Library related, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 23:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bohdan Pawłowicz

Hello Missvain. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Bohdan Pawłowicz".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bohdan Pawłowicz}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Advice needed re conflicting edits

Hi Missvain, since you welcomed me to Wikipedia I'm writing to ask your advice or direction as to where I can find an answer to some questions. I attempted to use the TeaHouse and look in other places, but frankly got lost. I am a long-time Wikipedia user but new editor. My question is this - Based on my reading of various Wikipedia guidelines, if I think that an edit is inappropriate (e.g., irrelevant quote, using a blog opinion as a "published source", or biased statements or quotes), can I change or delete them if I explain my reasons for doing so, or am I only allowed to suggest the changes in the Talk section, and hope that whoever submitted them will make the change? Also, what is the best way to depersonalize a discussion about edits or ask for intercession by an experienced editor if one party takes offense? For example, I had changed somebody's edits and the person responded in a highly personal way. I attempted to explain my changes, but the other person was apparently unwilling to provide either a rationale for their edits that seemed logical to me or to civilly explain why they disagreed with me. Since I'm not willing to engage in any sort of polemical discourse or written altercation simply because someone takes umbrage, should I just walk away or are there alternatives? Thank you!--Civlaction (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pretty busy in my non-wiki life, so I'm going to ask for some help from my friend User:Cullen328 who is a host at the Teahouse. He's a long-time editor and a good friend of mine offline and online (and knows how busy I am right now). I'd like him to help, if he has time, as he can provide you a more expansive response. Sorry that the timing isn't right for me this month! :) Missvain (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I'd be happy to address the question to him. Have you contact him on my behalf, or should I contact him directly? Thank you.--Civlaction (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Missvain and Civlaction. I would be happy to try to answer your questions, Civlaction, or rather to offer some informed opinions and suggestions. Let's move from Missvain's talk page at this time, to either yours or mine. I will leave you a note. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

AFC-approved article at AFD

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Leonardo; i mention you as AFC approver. I think it is generally understood that articles can be accepted in good faith at AFC, yet sometimes show up at AFD later; i don't think you have to defend yourself or comment at all, though you are welcome to comment of course. Thanks for your AFC participation, it's important! cheers, --doncram 22:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi! I'll be facilitating another edit-a-thon with Kaitymh at the Foundation in March for WikiWomen's History Month, and wondered if you had plans for hosting at Cal again? If you do, have you decided on a date? I didn't see anything on the events calendar, but thought I'd ask nonetheless so the 2 events aren't on the same weekend. :) Best, --Rosiestep (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Nope! I'm no longer a fellow there and don't really have much time to devote to volunteer event planning, so you're good to go! Missvain (talk) 18:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloomy rind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rind. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2015



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikipedia:Ms. Fembot Edit-a-Thon

Is this happening on Friday or Saturday? The wiki page says Friday but the linked Eventbrite says Saturday. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Or wait, is the Eventbrite only for the hack-a-thon?... Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Doh! I fixed it..yes..they made an Eventbrite for the hackathon. If you want to register for the Edit-a-thon you have to do this: RSVP to Kitty Lindsay by email at klindsay@feminist.org or call 866-471-3652 [toll free].  :) Thank you for letting me know User:Calliopejen1!!! Missvain (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Your list of lists of women is the most comprehensive list of lists of women I have ever come across whilst surfing the web. You earned a kitten.

Dmerker (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Descargar

Hi. You blocked this editor for a bad username, and unticked "Block account creation". Would you mind if I spamblocked him, and prevented new account creation? I ask because the userpage (now deleted) was promotional. (I tend to spamblock where the username is a product and the userpage is promoting the product.) Also, I just blocked another of his accounts [User talk:Descargar whatsapp para android|here]] (which was created before your block).

  • Convenience links:

Best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Absolutely. I'll make sure I check those things in the future prior to blocking, in the future, too. Good thinking! Missvain (talk) 16:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Cheers. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeymicom

Why did you delete the talk page? (Just asking, I don't know what was on it.) —George8211 / T 18:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

What was on it was a speedy deletion notice. As I could see no reason for this deletion I have restored the page. Did you maybe mean to delete their user page, the page which was nominated for speedy deletion? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Good call on the Guamsmells user block

It's simply Albert Pyun. He has a long history of vandalizing wikipedia. Readyforanderson (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Readyforanderson

Banque Morval

Just so you know, I re-nominated Banque Morval for speedy deletion, not for significance, but for copyvio. It was deleted once before for copyvio, and this page is an exact duplicate of the previous copyvio issues. I have a suspicion that the initial contributor to this page is a paid advertiser for this bank. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Average (sports)

Hi Missvain. Any idea what's going on with the strange deletions of things as redirects to "Average (sports)" such as this? This looks like a case of mistaken redirecting, as those should not have redirected to that article in the first place, but elsewhere. As far as I remember, most templates in Category:Medal infobox templates had their talk pages redirect to Template talk:MedalTop for centralised discussion. It makes no sense at all to delete the talk page of something like Template:MedalTableTop (20,000+ transclusions). Any idea what happened here? SFB 01:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why and how that happened. I have actually never seen templates and their associated talk pages deleted after I've closed an AFD. Perhaps an issue with Twinkle. I'm sorry I can't be more helpful. Clearly it was not an intended action. Missvain (talk) 03:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western District Chinese Christian Church

there was another article nominated for deletion in this AfD. can you please delete as well. thanks. LibStar (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks for keeping an eye out User:LibStar! Missvain (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

thanks, similarly for this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Consulate General, Cahul which had other articles nominated. LibStar (talk) 06:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Missvain (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Samir Becic

I saw that you recently approved this article via AfC. Please note that this article has been deleted via AfD and speedy deletion on multiple occasions. I won't wheel-war with you, but I trust that you had taken a look at the history before moving this into mainspace. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 07:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

P.S.: pinging @Nyttend:, who was the most recent to delete this as a G11. --Kinu t/c 07:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. LOL. Wheel warring. I don't even know why anyone would assume I'm the type to do that. I'm not :) I don't really review history of articles before I post them from AFC. 99% of the time all is well, so this is clearly a blib. I can speedy delete it I guess. Missvain (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I also salted it. I didn't think the article was actually that bad, and frankly, after my research, I think he might pass GNG. But, there are other ways to handle it rather than going around to AfC as we know. I can't stand the AfC process but I feel terrible that there are so many articles waiting for review...so..I jump in for time to time. Missvain (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
No worries... and I'm not the type to wheel-war either, of course. I felt it still met the speedy criteria but didn't feel comfortable deleting it myself, so thank you for taking a second look at it. :) And you're right in that perhaps a new article on this subject might survive, but (a) IPs attempting to undermine the deletion process to get it posted it is not the right course of action, and (b) this certainly didn't appear to be that article. Perhaps someone will open a discussion of some sort (at WP:DRV, perhaps?) in the future. Thanks again. --Kinu t/c 20:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 00:27:15, 18 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by JGGjr


Hello Missvain, Thank you for your review of my article for Matthew Duss - Do you expect that article would be deemed sufficiently sourced if I were to add links for each of the media outlet appearances that I refer to, or is there a different section of the article that's problematic?

Best Regards, and Thanks, JGGjr JGGjr (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi User:JGGjr, yes. The entire article should only be cited using reliable secondary sources - you can read more about those here. If there is something using a primary source, it should be removed. Also, please remove the Twitter mention. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not meant to be used to promote people or things. So, keep it as boring as humanly possible. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Kylie Auldist

Hi, I saw you declined this submission and recommended that it be merged into an existing article at Kylie Auldist. However, as you can see from the redlink in the previous sentence, there is no existing article to use as scaffolding. I am not the original creator of the draft, but I did some improving of it once I was apprised of its existence. I'd be happy to move it to mainspace myself, since it now demonstrates that the artist meets multiple criteria at WP:MUSIC, but I'm not sure if this is permitted, since I am not Cutest Penguin (the original reviewer) nor do I have any official affiliation with AFC. Chubbles (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. I went ahead and accepted it. I originally meant to suggest that it get merged into the article about the band she's in, but, that's OK. Thanks for keeping an eye out! Missvain (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
OK, thanks! Chubbles (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 21:18:45, 18 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by HFS-er


I am not sure whether this is the right place for my message, but I did not find any other place to put it.

I don't understand why the article I wrote was turned down. The message I got was that it did not show that the organization (European Association for Lexicography, Euralex) I described was important enough. However, I took the entry of a very similar organization (Dictionary Society of North America, DSNA) as a template and improved it by adding some structure. Is the DSNA more notable than Euralex? Moreover, the text I wrote is full of references to other articles which refer to the organization I describe (people, a journal). In some cases, there is even a red link, which I interpret as a request to create such an article. Does this not show that by adding this article, the internal coherence of the encyclopedia is improved?

In short, the decision seems to me arbitrary. If this kind of ill-founded decisions is normal wikipedia practice, I will not contribute any further articles.

HFS-er (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Australian Directors Guild - Martha Ansara

Sorry Missvain, I DO need help -- and after this I think I might give up!!

I wrote somewhere else in response your comment -- goodness knows where -- but will try again here with the same message:

I do not have nor have had any office or employment from the Australian Directors Guild. I am not even a board member, nor have I ever been. I am merely a long time member trying to contribute a little task that I saw needed doing -- namely, to put the history and information about the ADG on wikipedia. I find contributing to Wikipedia a bit confusing at times....but I did read the various guidelines and I don't know where there could be a conflict of interest. I have over the years written many articles about film and film business for Australian magazines and saw this as just another. Could you be more specific about what might be wrong with the article. Thanks very much for any help you can give MarthaAnsara (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Martha Ansara MarthaAnsara (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Martha Ansara

Do I need to submit the Australian Directors Guild article somewhere else? Sorry, I think I'm not up to this but want to complete what I started. Thanks MarthaAnsara (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Martha Ansara

Hi Martha. I really respect your work, I'm familiar with it. Anyway, being a member does mean there is a conflict of interest - you have a clear buy-in and want to see a successful organization - but, everyone has an opinion on defining conflict of interest around here :) I'm just speaking from personal experience (having gotten "in trouble" for editing about organizations I'm a member of!). Wikipedia relies on writing that is boring as hell and as neutral as possible - while it's hard to determine what is neutral when all humans are inherently bias about things, we do our best. And folks who generally write about things they're involved with generally has a bias towards looking positively upon said subject/thing Someone will review the article soon enough. Sorry it takes so long, there are only so many volunteers and so many submissions and Wikipedia articles (millions!). Patience is a virtue! Missvain (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Declined submission for Better Decisions Forum article

Hi, thank you for reviewing the article. I just want to share with you my point of view about it. Better Decisions Forum is not a company, so there's nobody payed for doing this: some people interested in Decision Making process rounded up and created the event that is freely sponsored by different associations. Everybody who took part the events is involved, so maybe I'm biased, but I in order to reach a right neutral point of view I mentioned a lot of reliable different sources from press and online press, like: Wired, Il Sole 24 Ore, Fight The Stroke, Institute for Scientific Interchange, etc. I decided to write in the article only sentences related to third part articles, I think that in this way the article is poor of contents but neutral. Can you please help me to understand how can I improve it in order to be accepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.57.24.131 (talk) 09:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. Using sentences like "The Better Decisions Forum was born in 2013 in order to help managers to fully understand the complex world of Decision Making through the storytelling of personal and professional decisions, by a modern and multidisciplinary approach," which include peacock and weasel words makes it non-neutral. Not everyone thinks that "Decision Making" is complex... and not everyone thinks that BDF is "modern" perhaps. Keep it boring as humanly possible. This is an encyclopedia - not a promotional website. If you want to sell the product, do it on its website or social media. Also, a conference isn't born - it's started. :) "The Better Decisions Forum was started in 2013 to help managers understanding decision making through storytelling and using a multidisciplinary approach," is what I'd write. Even the opening has some flowery words. Keep it simple. Also, that list of speakers will most likely be removed and made into one sentence stating that the people who have Wikipedia articles (i.e. Enrico Giovanni) spoke. Any YouTube links should be removed - they are primary sources. Just include one external link, AFTER the references, to the main website - it looks like a spam fest. Even if another editor does accept the article it'll be stripped to bare bones. Sorry, but, again, Wikipedia is a boring encyclopedia, nothing more nothing less. And, if you are affiliated with the forum, don't write the article about it. If it's so important/famous/influential then someone will write an article about it, eventually. Thanks and I hope that helps - we have a ton of content on Wikipedia, I hope you'll consider improving other subjects. Missvain (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

22:55:46, 18 February 2015 review of submission by 24.52.243.152


Draft:Centre for Study of Insurance Operations

The note you left said the sources aren't verifiable. I don't understand how they aren't verifiable. They are all fully independent, verifiable sources from within the Canadian insurance industry. Can you be more specific about what the issues are?

24.52.243.152 (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! 99% of them are press releases. Press releases are primary sources - not reliable secondary sources. Please visit this link to learn more about the kind of sources you need to use for a Wikipedia article. Thank you and happy editing. Missvain (talk) 22:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

OK but let me ask you this. ACORD is basically the same organization, but based in the US instead of Canada. How does their wiki page get approved when it only has one source? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACORD This wiki page is LESS well-referenced that my draft submission, and yet it's on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.243.152 (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. That article was created in 2006 - way before we had an articles for creation review process. Sadly, with 4 million articles, you get a lot of crap on Wikipedia that passes by the few active volunteers we have. I did some research and went ahead and nominated the article for deletion. So, it might not be on Wikipedia for long due to notability concerns. Thanks for pointing that out! Missvain (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Regarding secondary sources, wouldn't you agree that this one is a secondary source? http://analysis.tu-auto.com/insurance-telematics/qa-csio-efforts-standardize-ubi-telematics-data-north-america It's not a press release. It's an interview/journalism piece from an entirely independent organization, based in the UK. So are you saying the article needs more resources like this one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.243.152 (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes! As long as it's coverage that is significant meaning that it's not just a minor mention - the article has to be primarily about CSIO. :) Missvain (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft: BIStrainer

Dear Missvain, Thanks for the review my article related to BIStrainer. But i do not understand how can my article have copyright violations as i have written the Article related to BIStrainer LMS and the url (http://www.trainanddevelop.ca/learning-management-system-lms/) is all about this LMS. I would request to please help me more regarding this article as i have not added the content from the trainanddevelop. So can you please guide me or provide me valuable solution on this as i think BIStrainer LMS is one of the top LMS and it should be added on Wikipedia. Help me on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma.ashoks (talk • contribs) 04:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Just because you wrote it doesn't mean it's not copyrighted. We cannot have copyrighted material - no matter who wrote it - on Wikipedia unless it is explicitly released under an open license. You can find an email address to contact regarding that here. Also, your subject must pass our general notability guidelines. Basically, if other people haven't written about it, it can't be on Wikipedia - and when I say other people, I mean writers publishing books about it, academic papers about it, magazines/news outlets writing about it (not merely publishing press releases or mentioning it once in an article). I hope that helps! It might not be the time yet for this subject to have a Wikipedia article - and of course, if you are associated with the subject, then you SHOULD NOT write the Wikipedia article about it because that is a conflict of interest. I hope you will consider editing other articles on Wikipedia. There are millions that need your help. Missvain (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

==

Thanks for your information and help, i just want that wiki users also know about this new great LMS software. Can you help me to write on this LMS so that other also aware of this. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma.ashoks (talk • contribs) 11:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

SF edit-a-thons on March 7 and 8

ArtAndFeminism (3/7) and International Women's Day (3/8)!

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

In celebration of WikiWomen's History Month, the SF Bay Area Wikipedia community has two events in early March -- please consider attending!

First, we have an ArtAndFeminism edit-a-thon, which will take place at the Kadist Art Foundation from 12 noon to 6pm on Saturday, March 7. We'll be one of many sites worldwide participating in this edit-a-thon on March 7th. So join us as we help improve Wikipedia's coverage of women artists and their works!

Second, we will be celebrating International Women's Day with the International Women's Day edit-a-thon on Sunday, March 8 from 1pm to 5pm at the Wikimedia Foundation. Our editing focus will be on women, of course!

I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of future mailings about SF meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Regarding - review of Professor N.D. Ahuja Wiki Page

Dear Missvain,

I noticed that you have declined the submission based upon the reason that it was my personal Wiki. It is actually not my personal wiki. It is a wiki page submission for a highly respected, quoted and a prominent literate on Indian History who has contributed a lot to the comparitive religion studies. Professor Ahuja was a highly acclaimed historian with over 50 published books to his credit. He was awarded many national honors for his contributions and research. Yes, my last name and his last name are the same.

Please let me know what we need to do get this reviewed again. Any help and guidance will be highly appreciated.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahujaalok (talk • contribs) 18:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. Publishing a bunch of books does not necessarily make a person notable. Please take a look at WP:ACADEMIC and read about what types of sources you need to supply for the subject to have his own article. I know you share a last name, and that's fine, but, if you are associated with him - even related to him - PLEASE DO NOT WRITE THE ARTICLE ABOUT HIM. It's a conflict of interest and you could get blocked. If he's so famous and influential, someone not-related to him will write about him someday. Feel free to resubmit when after you work on the article again and someone else (not me) will review it. Thank you for editing! Missvain (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain/Archive_37&oldid=1074260041"