User talk:NateDawg652

Welcome!

Hi NateDawg652! I noticed your contributions to Carl Nassib and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Don’t make test edits on Wikipedia, as you did on Corey Peters. If you would like to expirement, please use your sandbox. ReaganHoang10 (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT an administrator, but I would like to remind you because you added a weird letter. ReaganHoang10 (talk) 05:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. An edit that you recently made to Osa Odighizuwa seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 23:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Osa Odighizuwa, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 23:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clay Johnston (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tackle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hi. I can see that you've been told multiple times about experimenting with Wikipedia articles, and how to do so without actually disrupting an article. Please take the advice above. Your edit to Carl Nassib -- inserting a numeral into a word that was properly spelled, thus rendering a link unusable -- is considered disruptive editing and vandalism.

Please be aware that this message is your warning. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue to vandalize articles. Moncrief (talk) 21:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ledarius Mack is #43 and Christian is #23

Ledarius Mack is #43 and Christian is #23 2601:249:B01:D450:294C:86D1:70E8:200D (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NateDawg652/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NateDawg652/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NateDawg652! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit without adding sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NateDawg652/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NateDawg652/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Mills

Can Someone please make a Bryan Mills Page he is a Cornerback for the Cleveland Browns.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Guggemos (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, case of WP:TOOSOON, maybe after he actually plays a professional NFL game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Guggemos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Guggemos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Guggemos (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has yet to make his debut

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Guggemos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Guggemos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Guggemos (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ArsenalGhanaPartey was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON. This article can only be created once he makes his NFL debut.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Guggemos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Guggemos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isaiah Weston moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Isaiah Weston, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silas Kelly

The article Silas Kelly has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Logan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Glen Logan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 17:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silas Kelly moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Silas Kelly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 17:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Travell Harris moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Travell Harris, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 17:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Harley Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mike Harley Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 17:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zaire Mitchell-Paden moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zaire Mitchell-Paden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 17:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality stubs.

Hi, please refrain from creating articles in mainspace that are not properly cited using footnotes and seem to be created hastily with no indication of improvement. Please draft these articles first. Additionally, please do not recreate an article in mainspace that was moved to draftspace for being inadequate. See WP:CIR ~XyNq^t_c 17:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NFL Football (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at National Football League instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NFL Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NFL Football, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Johnson III moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Johnny Johnson III, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~XyNq^t_c 18:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

D'Anthony Bell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, D'Anthony Bell, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liliana ^(UwU) 21:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johnny Johnson III (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Johnny Johnson III and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Independence Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deon Jackson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2017 Cotton Bowl Classic (December)

added a link pointing to Ronald Jones

2017 Heart of Dallas Bowl

added a link pointing to Gary Jennings

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Jolly moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shaun Jolly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zaire Mitchell-Paden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaire Mitchell-Paden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaire Mitchell-Paden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brock Hoffman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brock Hoffman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Hoffman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roderick Perry II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roderick Perry II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick Perry II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Harley Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Harley Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Harley Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Kwenkeu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Kwenkeu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Kwenkeu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brad Hawkins (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brad Hawkins (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Hawkins (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irvin Charles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irvin Charles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irvin Charles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malik Davis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roy Mbaeteka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roy Mbaeteka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Mbaeteka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stanley Berryhill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanley Berryhill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Berryhill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tay Martin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tay Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quandre Mosely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quandre Mosely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quandre Mosely until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alec Anderson (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alec Anderson (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Anderson (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent article creations

Hi! I recently noticed you are creating a number of new articles for various players in the NFL. I applaud you wanting to do this, but you need to make sure each page is worthy of creation, and none of the ones you created are. Your page for Shaun Jolly was moved to a draft, and I'd be willing to do this for your other pages, but I feel overall deletion is more warranted. These pages are far off from being worthy of creation, per WP:Notability (people), and likely many will never be fully created. Shaun Jolly is at least on the active roster and could get playing time. Many of the pages you created are for practice squad players with no guarantees of ever playing. Please read up on the notability criteria for creating articles before you create any more. Usually, a rule of thumb is they have to play in an NFL game before they are notable, or have legitimate notability for another reason (likely off the field). Simply signing with a team and making their practice squad does not warrant article creation. Thanks! Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NateDawg652: If you continue to refuse to communicate in addition to creating these articles on players with questionable notability, you may receive a block from editing. GPL93 (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say that "none of the ones" you created should exist, but several are like that. Please make sure that the person has either played in the NFL or has had two+ in-depth articles from different news sources which meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG before creating it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to put forth more effort into the article creations too. It looks like you are trying to create as many articles as you can as quickly as possible and not paying attention to quality or putting any sort of substantial information in the article. While there isn't a minimum size for an article, we do need more than an infobox, a sentence or two, a couple categories.--Rockchalk7 17 23:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rockchalk717:, @Debartolo2917:, @BeanieFan11:. Unfortunately, it looks like this editor is neither heading any of our advice nor trying to communicate. If they continue to create borderline notable articles with zero real effort and barely any refs, then an ANI is probably needed to request either a block until the editor communicates on their talk page or a block from creating articles in the mainspace. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop but can you teach me how to do it good and what are the notabillity guidlines for college football players. and how do i cite and cite inline @Rockchalk717:, @Debartolo2917:, {{ping|BeanieFan11}

I would recommend using Articles for Creation to submit your drafts. Unless the player is an FBS consensus All-American or wins one of the national awards, there is no automatic notability for college football players. You need to establish WP:GNG by citing multiple Reliable sources. Team bios/articles, recruiting and stat profiles on sites such as ESPN, box scores and game reports generally do not count and team-centric blogs & school newspaper articles don't really either although they can be used for verifying details within an article. Also try to find sources that are from major media outlets if possible because an article on a player sourced solely from local newspapers may not be accepted. If you'd like to see an example, I recently created John Torchio, which has a mix of sources. He has received localized coverage from his high school days in the Bay Area and from various outlets in Wisconsin, but I don't think Torchio would merit an article had it not been for profiles in two national outlets (the Associated Press and the Athletic). Usually, I try to find at least 6-7 refs before moving an article out of the draft space. GPL93 (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use Template:Cite web to cite something inline. Using an example from Johnny Johnson III, a reference looks something like this: <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/2021/08/super-senior-receiver-johnny-johnson-iii-a-consummate-leader-for-oregon-ducks.html|website=[[Oregon Live]]|date=August 24, 2021|author=Crepea, James|title=Super senior receiver Johnny Johnson III a ‘consummate leader’ for Oregon Ducks}}</ref> which produces ^[1]. If that looks too complicated, just cite the bare url (like <ref>https://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/2021/08/super-senior-receiver-johnny-johnson-iii-a-consummate-leader-for-oregon-ducks.html</ref>) and enter the article in refill.org once you're done, which fills in citations. To pass the notability criteria, a player usually has to have at least two in-depth articles from independent, reliable sources (although sometimes more may be needed). An example of an in-depth article (WP:SIGCOV) would be something like this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a page for Domenique Davis, Allan George, and Ben Stiile they are all notable NateDawg652 (talk) 18:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is deeply inappropriate for you to solicit other people to edit on your behalf while you are blocked. Deeply inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 18:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Crepea, James (August 24, 2021). "Super senior receiver Johnny Johnson III a 'consummate leader' for Oregon Ducks". Oregon Live.

Also, near the end of the article, add ==References== and underneath of that {{Reflist}}. That will display the references in the correct location. You could look at some of my recent article creations if you want to see how it looks in an actual article. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks would they be notable say they won one of the confrence awards like sun belt freshman of the year? NateDawg652 (talk) 17:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Maybe for a Power 5 for an overall Offensive or Defensive Player of the Year, but even then you'd have show significant coverage to go with the award. GPL93 (talk) 17:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They probably would be notable (as in-depth coverage is usually given to players with those accomplishments), but you would need to cite significant coverage in order for them to have an article. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a page for George Holani can you check it and do some citing if needed NateDawg652 (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite for Kolby Harvell-Peel I just made NateDawg652 (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite for J.J. Russell Please NateDawg652 (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite for Don Gardner and J. J. Russell NateDawg652 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don Gardner (American football) NateDawg652 (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NateDawg652: We have told you how to cite and recommended you work in the draftspace, but instead you're ignoring our advice continuing to do the same thing and then asking other editors to do the work for you. Please head this advice. GPL93 (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have an article in the sandbox of Domenique Davis if you could check it out that would be appricatedand if it is approved I belvie I should be unblocked NateDawg652 (talk) 12:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend starting articles in draftspace and working on them there until they're ready rather than just creating articles directly into mainspace. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved both of these to the draft space. PLEASE work on these as drafts, if you do not understand core concepts of editing you should not be continually trying to create articles like this in the mainspace. This will give you time to learn and to improve these articles without the threat of deletion or facing any editing sanctions (such as a mainspace editing block or a block under the Competence is required umbrella). GPL93 (talk) 18:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noah Ruggles

The article Noah Ruggles has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jesse Mirco has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jesse Mirco. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Noah Ruggles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Noah Ruggles. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mika Tafua has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mika Tafua. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please properly cite your references using <ref> </ref> format. See WP:CITE for additional details. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Horton (footballer) moved to draftspace - not finished and only primary sources.

An article you recently created, Mike Horton (footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Berryhill.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Berryhill.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 17:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Hickman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ronnie Hickman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kolby Harvell-Peel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kolby Harvell-Peel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

George Holani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, George Holani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kolby Harvell-Peel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kolby Harvell-Peel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Horton (footballer) (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need in-depth coverage about him. Stats and standard profiles is not sufficient. Please also see this guide for adding citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Horton (footballer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolby Harvell-Peel (draft 2) (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit drafts until the issues noted by the NPP reviewer have been resolved. You may not be aware but the notability guidelines have changed so what was accepted a year or so ago may not be acceptable now. Sports related articles are generally expected to meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel (draft 2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Holani (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Holani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nick Guggemos

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nick Guggemos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isaiah Weston

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isaiah Weston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isaiah Weston 2

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isaiah Weston 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Travell Harris

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Travell Harris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zaire Mitchell-Paden

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zaire Mitchell-Paden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Harley Jr.

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Harley Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jalen Dalton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jalen Dalton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for repeatedly creating new articles with dubious notability, lack of sources, despite warnings.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Eagles 24/7 (C) 11:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I should be able to atleast edit pages NateDawg652 (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had no infractions for editing just for creating so I should be blocked for creating but nit for editing NateDawg652 (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there is not a way technically to block someone from just creating pages. Until you demonstrate your understanding of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, you will have to request edits to articles via talk pages using {{Request edit}}. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I demonstrate my understanding NateDawg652 (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit new articles as drafts (see WP:DRAFT for more information) and work with Articles for Creation reviewers to get your drafts promoted to mainspace articles. Once you get the hang of notability guidelines and policies, you can appeal this block either to me directly or to another administrator. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Why I have been blcoked and will not do it again and I have submitted a Draft for Domenique Davis if you can review that it would be greatly appricated and if it gets approved I think I should be unblocked NateDawg652 (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Fleming moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Parker Fleming, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Stille moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ben Stille, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don Gardner (American football) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Don Gardner (American football), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MallardDuck9

The MallardDuck9 account was just created, and states on their user page here that this account (NateDawg652) is their main account, meaning that MallardDuck9 is an alt account of yours. Is this true? Is the other account an alt account belonging to you? Please ping me in your response; I have too many subscriptions at the moment. :-) Thanks - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can You Unblock me I understand what I did wrong and will not do it again plus I have created a new page in my sandbox and if you can check that out it would be much appricated and if it does get approved I belive I should be reinstated NateDawg652 (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And its not this is my only account NateDawg652 (talk) 01:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked MallardDuck9 was not my account NateDawg652 (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but once I saw the indefinite partial-block that was active on this account, and saw that the other account made an edit to mainspace (which would be in violation of the block applied to this account), and in addition to the claim left on the user page about this account also belonging to you - I had enough evidence to investigate and see whether this were true. After investigating the other account, I've confirmed using checkuser evidence that this account is associated. You're welcome to appeal your block if you wish, but the evidence to me is very clear. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I appell NateDawg652 (talk) 01:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've already started your appeal below. You did it correctly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NateDawg652 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here MallardDuck9 was not a sock puppet of mine

Decline reason:

Confirmed based on technical evidence. Confirmed sock, Uyw37nsdogsaregodnuyeg, also blocked. And confirmed based on the claim here. Yamla (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See the response I made above for a summary of my rationale. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: & @Oshwah: new sock located here. Didn't really even try to hide it. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap. Blocked and tagged. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isaiah Weston

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Isaiah Weston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isaiah Weston 2

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isaiah Weston 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Travell Harris

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Travell Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zaire Mitchell-Paden

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zaire Mitchell-Paden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Harley Jr.

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Harley Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domenique Davis has been accepted

Domenique Davis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Johnny Johnson III

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Johnny Johnson III, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Johnny Johnson III

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Johnny Johnson III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jesse Mirco

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jesse Mirco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mika Tafua

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mika Tafua, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noah Ruggles

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noah Ruggles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ronnie Hickman

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ronnie Hickman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Horton (footballer)

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Horton (footballer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel (draft 2)

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel (draft 2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mika Tafua

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mika Tafua".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noah Ruggles

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noah Ruggles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ronnie Hickman

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronnie Hickman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Horton (footballer)

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mike Horton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel (draft 2)

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kolby Harvell-Peel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kolby Harvell-Peel

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kolby Harvell-Peel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Parker Fleming (draft 2)

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parker Fleming".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tre'Vius Hodges-Tomlinson

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tre'Vius Hodges-Tomlinson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Holani

Hello, NateDawg652. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Holani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Holani

Hello, NateDawg652. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George Holani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Crepea, James (August 24, 2021). "Super senior receiver Johnny Johnson III a 'consummate leader' for Oregon Ducks". Oregon Live.

[1]