User talk:Phanuruch8555

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #266

User page | Talk page | My experiences | Experiment lab

Achives: Current | 1

The current one is Ach.2

All Newsletters goes here.[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.


He have overpass still the warning claiming copyright on http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Logo_goa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 which is my own work under cc licence. This guy is insanly mad. He seems have done it because he had try to uppload copyrighted material and was angry !!!!!

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
  • Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you.

Free use rationale[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your message on my talk page regarding File:Eurovision 2004 Scoreboard.jpg. I was not aware that it has slipped out of use from the Eurovision Song Contest article - I will restore it. However, before I do I want to ensure that I have done everything correctly with regards the rationale. As far as I can see, the page for the image already justifies its use. So what am I missing? I have never understood exactly what you have to do with these image uploads: the process is unclear. Yes, I understand that non-free images need to be justified - but I have done this in the past, and have had images deleted. What have I done wrong this time? Please help me by explaining if there is anything wrong with the justification as it stands. Thank you. EuroSong talk 18:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments at User talk:Eurosong#Orphaned non-free image File:Eurovision 2004 Scoreboard.jpg. CT Cooper · talk 20:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PNG[edit]

Hello. Your attempt to unilaterally make Portable Network Graphics the primary topic of PNG has been reverted. I assume you never read Talk:PNG, where there has been several discussions on whether to make Papua New Guinea the primary topic instead. As of now, there is therefore really no consensus that there even should be a primary topic for PNG at all. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 20:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Vancouver2010MinuteofSilence.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Vancouver2010MinuteofSilence.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rugby.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Rugby.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ESCJury.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:ESCJury.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESCJury.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ESCJury.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed page moves[edit]

You seem to be on some kind of a spree, renaming a number of articles, for instance Sysop and FC Bayern Munich. Please be advised that such moves are likely to be controversial and should not be undertaken without prior discussion. A safer approach is to follow the procedure described at WP:Requested moves. Favonian (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at YOG, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not perform any more undiscussed page moves! Favonian (talk) 10:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He have overpass still the warning claiming copyright on http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Logo_goa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 which is my own work under cc licence. This guy is insanly mad. He seems have done it because he had try to uppload copyrighted material and was angry !!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.194.69.125 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Refactoring other editors' comments[edit]

Please don't do something like this again! You may remove other editors' comments from your talk page, but you may not alter them. Favonian (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to believe that you own this talk page. You are mistaken, and as a consequence you should respect the norms of this project - which includes signing posts on all talk pages. Your mass page moves without discussion haven't stopped either I see. Though it has been a while, my earlier comments on taking this to WP:ANI or another venue if necessary still stand. CT Cooper · talk 11:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Forumspam.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Forumspam.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CT Cooper · talk 11:51, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is What should be done about Phanuruch8555?. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 10:58, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abuse of editing privileges. On 30 August I left you this message about your editing. Since then you have continued to cause numerous problems including edit-warring, incorrect page moves, and numerous image and non-free media violations. Whilst some of your edits are useful, you cannot continue to create numerous problems which waste other editor's valuable time being fixed. I would suggest that you use the week's block to read up on our policies, notably WP:NFCC, WP:MOVE and WP:EW. This may also be useful. You may also wish to seek mentorship from an experienced editor - Wikipedia:Mentorship is a useful page to start at. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do any more disruption since the last warning came Phanuruch8555 Talk Experiment lab 10:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Warnings are a couretsy, not a requirement. You have given no indication that you understand why you have been blocked, or that you intend to rectify your behaviour.—An  optimist on the run! 12:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem is that you were supposed to stop being disruptive after the first warning, or indeed, not have ever been disruptive at all. It has taken this block to even get your attention. Have you read the ANI report (linked above)? Do you understand the problems that have led to this block? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will making a constructive contributions once the block has lifted.

Decline reason:

That is good news, and I look forward to seeing those constructive contributions once the week's block is up. However, I see no reason to reduce the length of the block. You have still given no indication that you understand why you have been blocked, or in what ways you intend to rectify your behaviour. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to update every second of RWC weekend match.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but that's not a reason for us to unblock you. Someone else can update them, or you can after your block expires. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

... and no, this is not a news source, and we do not ever "update every second of RWC weekend match". To do so would be disruptive. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page colors[edit]

Please stop changing the background and font coloring on this page. You're making it very difficult to read. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporally page:WikiProject Facebook applications[edit]

Due to a block, I would create a temporally page for WikiProject Facebook applications

Wikipedia:WikiProject Facebook applications[edit]

Welcome to WikiProject Facebook applications, our goal is create, expand and improve the article about Facebook applications

Participants[edit]

To participate, please type# ~~~ and you'll be added. You can promote our project by placing {{User WikiProject Facebook applications}} to your userpage, which will be created after the block has been lifted.

  1. Phanuruch8555 Talk Experiment lab
Are you sure this is a good idea? There isn't even a Wikipedia:WikiProject Facebook yet, let alone one on applications. If a Facebook WikiProject is needed, then a general one should be created first. Most Facebook applications are not notable either, so I could see this WikiProject having most of its articles deleted, and such WikiProjects tend to end-up being taken to WP:MFD and deleted. CT Cooper · talk 11:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forumspam.png[edit]

The template says: "If you don't want the file deleted, please provide explanatory information about the copyright status of this image. Please do not remove this notice while the question is being considered." Yet you decided to remove the template anyway. In light of your recent block, and past warnings for removing such templates, any further attempts at removal of deletion templates will be treated as disruption - pure and simple. CT Cooper · talk 13:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jobs unclear edit summary[edit]

Hi; your edit summary of "the image is important" when you reverted my copyedit was confusing - I assume it relates to the image on the homepage? I didn't actually remove any information so am a bit lost as to the issue :) Please let me know the problem so I can copyedit again (the paragraph is a bit dodgy) incorporating your suggestion. --Errant (chat!) 12:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Phanuruch8555/VandalCup[edit]

Could you explain this, please, because it appears to be a competition you're creating inviting currently blocked vandals to sockpuppet, against our policies. Given the other unconstructive edits you've made since your last block, it still appears that you have to understood why you were blocked the first time. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you thought the idea of a vandal cup was funny - it wasn't. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I forgot to log out. Markschmitz is my enemy and always coming with me and he is arguing me again. Phanuruch8555 Talk Experiment lab 12:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I'm sorry, I meant to vandalize anonymously" is not an excuse. I'm not even sure what the second sentence means or how it relates to this block. Looking at the prior history here, you will need to provide a much more comprehensive unblock request. Kuru (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • FYI: after a previous issue with his editing this user claimed another person (Markschmitz) had used his login. On that occasion, since the edits were clearly vandalistic, a warning only was given. It is not the case that the latest edits were performed by someone else, however, since the editing style is exactly the same. See also the first ANI report and the second ANI report as well as the current ANI thread. Black Kite (t) (c) 14:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You had deleted that VandalCup.

Decline reason:

Not a reason to unblock. You'll have to come up with something better than that. Peridon (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phanuruch8555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make a constructive edits, and I will never lead the other to sock and vandalize. That's my big mistake about that cup, I always think about the first block issued.

Decline reason:

I don't think you understand what Wikipedia is and how it works, even though it has been repeatedly explained to you. Maybe consider the standard offer for blocked users. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:WSSCCSabathia.png[edit]

⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:WSSCCSabathia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Youth Olympic Logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Youth Olympic Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Editwarring.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Editwarring.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoFIFASuperstars.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LogoFIFASuperstars.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phanuruch8555&oldid=1124365795"