User talk:Slarre

Welcome!

Hello, Slarre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! android 79 01:54, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Please take a closer look at the speedy criteria for images. If two files are identical but have different filetypes (i.e. JPG and PNG) then the undesired type is explicitly not a CSD and must be deleted through the WP:IFD process instead. Cheers, android 79 01:54, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LoL. Wikipedia bureaucracy owns! /Slarre 01:58, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should say that. IIRC, I'm the one who suggested the "different file types = not speedy" rule, and now it's biting me in the ass. I untagged about 30 of them earlier today. android 79 02:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Media Bias

You should update [Bias], there's a new survey called "Journalist 2006" that gives quite a different result compared to "Journalist 2000". See: http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=572&a=539612&previousRenderType=2

~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.188.235 (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion of Iraq

What about all the Iraqis are pissed off at the US because of the war? It was certainly not a "liberation". --Hottentot

Pissed because the US removed the bloodthirsty massmurdering dictator Saddam Hussein? Please... /Slarre 02:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it's obvious that the US's motive for invading Iraq was oil, and that the US lied about their reasons for invading Iraq. Furthermore, conditions for the Iraqi people have definitely not improved since Saddam was deposed. Most of them have no electricity and running water. --Hottentot

OMG, moonbat detected! /Slarre 02:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How about Ignorance detected? --Hottentot

Please do not restore your cat on Galloway, Chirac, etc. It is pretty clear that the cat is going to be deleted. AlistairMcMillan 15:22, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then discuss this at the correct please instead of engaging in edit wars. /Slarre 15:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Three Revert Rule

Please be aware of the three revert rule. AlistairMcMillan 15:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have not reverted more than three times, just as many times as you did. /Slarre 15:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't accusing you of breaking the rule. I was just making sure you were aware of it, so that you don't break it. AlistairMcMillan 15:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Translation!?

Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!

The first railroad line in Albania was built in 1948 linking Tiranë with Durrës on the coast and Elbasan in the interior. The main ports are Durrës, Vlorë, Shëngjin, and Sarandë.

Albania has a somewhat limited telephone network. There is a fairly extensive broadcasting service, however, and television programming began in 1971. Newspaper circulation is quite limited. There is a state university at Tiranë.

--Armour 09:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EPS>SVG

Hello! What do you type in pstoedit (at the command line) in order to convert from eps to svg? /Slarre 18:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. pstoedit uses plugins to convert to different target formats. Run pstoedit -help to see if there are any SVG plugins available on your install. On my Debian Linux system, I have the "plot-svg" plugin which converts to SVG output via GNU's libplot. This is available by installing the libpstoedit0 Debian package. You can then run pstoedit -f plot-svg inputfile.eps outputfile.svg .

Note that this implementation isn't perfect, the SVG output generated required some hand-tuning in the attempts I have made. If you have any problems, let me know and I would be glad to help out. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Author articles

Hi, I have noticed that you have recently been creating a number of articles were the content is of the form: X is a Y author. Please consider adding a little more information to each of these articles because as they stand each is a valid candidate for speedy deletion under criteria A7 (An article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject). Adding one or two sentences to each article indicating why these authors are notable (published books, literary awards, ...) is all that is required to overcome this problem. --Allen3 ^talk 02:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boström and spelling mistakes?

Hej! I've been translating the Boström article that you requested a while ago and ran into this sentence: Hans övriga intressen bestod i ett stärkt försvar vilket yttrade sig i från hans sida på ett stärkt sjöförsvar och ett starkt motstånd mot upphävande av indelningsverket. Is stärkt right or should that be starkt? While I've never run across stärkt försvar, it's not unlikely that it just comes from not reading too much Swedish anymore. I've though about translating the sentence like this: In addition, he was interested in a strong defence, which he considered to have manifested itself as a strong marine defence, and a strong opposition to the abolition of the Swedish allotment system. How does that sound? -Yupik 20:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Nice to see someone translating this article. The word "stärkt" in Swedish means "strengthened", although I think "strong" would work here as well. /Slarre 21:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've been reading too much German lately, as I figured it should be förstärkt or starkt, but not stärkt. Pretty interesting article and a challenge to translate as I have to constantly be looking up the terms for things like "allotment system"! Hopefully I'll be able to work on the ones left over over time, too. Plus, I've been translating other related articles (Ludvig Almqvist). Feel free to check out the translations and copyedit them! -Yupik 22:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'll check them out. /Slarre 22:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Far use policy

Hi. I think you have misunderstood Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy item #9.

It says: "Fair use images should be used only in the article namespace". The article namespace means all those articles that do not start with "User:", "Talk:", "Template", etc. I don't see why you have to remove fair use images from articles such as Riksdag. Could you please explain your reasoning?

Fred-Chess 23:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use logos can only be used to describe the article in question. See User:Durin/Removal of fair use images for more info. It is also a standard policy in enwiki to use colors instead of logos in lists related to political parties/election results. /Slarre 23:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arvid Lindman

Hi. I've translated sv:Arvid Lindman to Arvid Lindman now. Just so you know. Will most likely translate a few more of the pages that translation are requested for, don't remember if you had requested any of those, or if it was only this, but anyway. --Spreetin 21:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looks very good. /Slarre 22:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hi, can you please stop unilaterally changing the maps in all those articles some of us actually like them and should be given the opportunity to defend our views on the matter. Self-appointed arbiters only cause edit wars.--Tekleni 20:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto!--Eupator 20:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Self-appointed arbiters" Aha! I guess that's why it's ok for you to revert to your version. /Slarre 20:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They jumped all over me for not liking their taste in maps too, you are not alone. The Country the article is about should be proudly in the center of the map, the old maps should stay!--Hamparzoum 20:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with images that you have uploaded (twice) in the Harold Pinter page (Current one was tagged for speedy deletion: see the image page)

Both images that you placed in that article have the same problem. There are no rationales provided relating to fair use for either image. They are copyrighted images and neither in the public domain nor actually within fair use (as per your apparent claims on those images' pages). The more recently-taken (Nobel Prize) photo is better quality and more recent, but it is not within fair use, and there is no fair use rationale given for it (by you and/or the original uploader), just as there is no rationale given for fair use for any of the relatively-current photos of Pinter that you or others have taken from the BBC.

Fair use rationale for Image:Harold Pinter.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Harold Pinter.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NYScholar 08:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Ataturk

Don't even start.. There are tons of archives on the top right corner, if you want more background info on the concensus reached, please check them.. And check the templates on top of the talk page as well. On the other hand, if you find any impartial information or source proving his participation in anything, please bring them in. Maybe he did not participate in them and that's why it is not mentioned, has that thought occurred to you my fellow?? We have been going over this for months now with many passers-by dropping in and asking the same questions and over and over and over again.. Funny thing is, nobody can bring in any sources. It is like Groundhog Day, it seems to start all over again :)) Baristarim 16:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second this thought. Please read over the most recent archives of the Ataturk Talk page. If indeed you have any information regarding credible assertions that Ataturk played a part in either the Armenian or Assyrian genocide please refer to such so that the issue might be further evaluated. I'm pretty familiar with most of the activities surounding the Armenian Genocide (though perhaps less so in the Assyrian case) and I am also very familiar with Ataturk's activities during this period as well as preceeding such and after and I am not aware of anything that directly links Ataturk to the Armenian genocide. If one examines his activities during this period you sill see that he performed almost exclusively as a professional military officer and was not involved in any way in establishing state policy or carrying it out - beyond his duties as on officer in the Ottoman/Turkish army. While the army did slaughter conscripted Armenian men and did attack certain Armenian towns and villages it was not the principle means of enacted the Armenian Genocide nor arre there any reports that I am aware of of Ataturk taking part in any actions against Armenian civilians or Armenian conscripts during this period. By all accounts Ataturk was appauled by the severity and in-humaness of the CUP directed actions against the Armenians during this time.--THOTH 16:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was attempting some humor, so don't take it the wrong way :) As AW said below, we had a very looon debate about this after the page got protected for edit-warring on this precise issue, and it just got unprotected yesterday, we put in the concensus version that was agreed on the talk page after a looong debate, and it had to be semi-protected again couple of hours ago because of random anon vandalism and edit-warring. So, we r a bit touchy :) But you are more than welcome to drop in and participate in the debate: many users would like that article to succeed in a GA review and an eventual FA review, so we need to cover all grounds with good references.. But just keep in mind that there is a live debate. Don't say I didn't warn you :)Baristarim 16:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ataturk

Hi there. If you have some verifiable sources about him and genocide, please discuss that on the article's talk page. We just had a long and contentious debate about it, so people are still probably a bit riled up - please be as reasonable as you can. Thanks. --AW 16:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Swedish Navy.svg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 08:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Livgardet.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Livgardet.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Swartz

Hi. I have translated the Carl Swartz article if you'd like to check it out. Pikiwedian 07:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It looks very good~indeed. /Slarre 16:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVT's logotype

I just noticed that you changed the logotype back to the old one in the article on Sveriges Television. Please note that the logotype I changed to earlier today is the current and correct one used by SVT since 2006. The logotype you have supplied is the one that was in use from 2001 until last year. The size and style of the lettering has since been modified and nowadays almost always presented white on blue background. However, I can make an inverted version on a transparent background, if that's preferred. --Aatox 23:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding. An inverted logo on transparent background would be good. /Slarre 23:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll do that tomorrow. Or later today, I mean... --Aatox 23:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) /Slarre 23:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sveriges Television logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sveriges Television logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DFLP logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DFLP logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anders Wijkman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anders Wijkman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 23:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location Maps

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb 2007 20:36 (UTC)

Image:Charlotte Cederschiöld.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charlotte Cederschiöld.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 03:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Christofer Fjellner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christofer Fjellner.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 03:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nils Lundgren.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nils Lundgren.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 07:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lars Wohlin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lars Wohlin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 07:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maria Carlshamre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maria Carlshamre.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 07:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

High / Privy Council of Sweden move request

New move proposal here: Talk:High_Council_of_Sweden#Requested_move_2 — AjaxSmack 02:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish, please comment further on this topic here. ~ AjaxSmack 07:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Riksdagsledamöter

Greetings, compatriot. We've met here on several occasions, I believe, but what brings me here now is that I notice you more often than what could be considered normal on my watchlist. Were I paranoid, I might think you were stalking me, but sane as I am I simply note that you share some of my interests. Therefore, and also considering your frequent appearance on Special:Recentchangeslinked/User:Jobjörn/Riksdagsledamöter, I was wondering if you would like to help out with my one-man wikiproject over at User:Jobjörn/Riksdagsledamöter? Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 23:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In example, my watchlist just showed 15 edits replacing "Moderate Youth League" with "Swedish Young Conservatives". Nice work. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 02:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the notice, and nice work with the list. I'll take a look at it when I have some time. /Slarre 18:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sven_Otto_Littorin.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sven_Otto_Littorin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 00:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anders_Borg.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anders_Borg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 00:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of North European Jews

Thank you for removing the dud entries under Sweden. Are you in a position to provide positive references for other names to prove that they are Jewish? There are very few editors with enough knowledge of Swedish to do so.--Runcorn 23:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yeah, I'm keeping the list and Category:Swedish Jews on my watchlist since there seem to be some editors with a will to label certain people as Jewish without providing any sources. The entries definitely needs to be sourced. I'll try and see if i can find any reputable sources for other names on the list. /Slarre 23:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish relations

Hello, I tried to put the "bilateral" template to Finnish-Swedish relations, however, the map doesn't seem to show up. I did upload the map, it's Image:Finland Sweden Locator.png there. I saw you had done Swedish-American relations so maybe you can figure this out. Maybe I missed something very obvious but I can't think what's wrong. --Pudeo (Talk) 19:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image seems to work fine for me. /Slarre 04:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So for me now, the file name showed as a red link for the whole day eventhough I had refressed it completely. So some database bugs, no probs then. --Pudeo (Talk) 18:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

You succeeded in abbreviating four out of four words in an edit summary, a remarkable achievement indeed! ;) Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 00:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, thanks! :) /Slarre 00:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV dispute over at Carl Bildt

Hi Slarre. I thought I'd drop a note notifying you of the fact that I've removed all contested statements from the Carl Bildt article and initiated a discussion at Talk:Carl Bildt#POV dispute. Please drop by and have your say. Sincerely, Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting...

...your babelfish. I agree with you about everything but beliving in God. See it:Utente:Checco. But tell me one thing... a person like you, in Sweden... what Swedih party do you find closer to your (and my) political ideas? --Checco 21:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would probably say that the Liberal (People's) Party is the closest to my views, even if they have started to get a bit too social liberal lately. The Centre Party (the old agrarian party) is also getting more and more liberal which is interesting, even if they still have some anti-liberal views such as support for the EU Common Agricultural Policy and other things. /Slarre 21:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Sweden a terrible place for a libertarian like you? Obviously I'm joking... --Checco 22:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweden is just fine :) /Slarre 22:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See you... next time answer me in my user talk, thak you. Very pleased of having met you. --Checco 22:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I worked a little bit with my userpage, userboxes and categories. If you want you can check to see if it is all right. My idea was that all these userboxes make the user automatically member of the related category. I also used and changed two userboxes taken from your userpage (see User:Checco/Userboxes/USA and User:Checco/Userboxes/Israel). I hope you won't be annoyed about it. Sorry also for my bad English. --Checco 12:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, of course not! I'll add those templates to my page too. /Slarre 23:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TGGWS

Weasel / biased. I agree. But which *way* do you think its biased? William M. Connolley 23:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The intro is clearly biased against the film, describing it in a pejorative way with words like "controversial" etc. The intro mentions that it argues against "prominent scientific" (however, there are many other prominent scientists who agree that there is not enough evidence of man-made global warming). The intro also states that the film "has been criticised", however it does not mention by WHOM (weasel words). If so much criticism should be mentioned in the intro, then it should also be mentioned that the film also has been received prais by others. Putting only negative criticism in the intro goes against WP:NPOV. /Slarre 23:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, yes there are plenty who think like that. Personally I think the intro is biased in favour of the film, which should be described as propaganda. I only asked because it was impossible to tell from the tag you added which way you were thinking - did you somehow assume no-one could think it biased in favour? William M. Connolley 07:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Politics of Sweden

Sigh... I'd suggest that make a vectorized version of the official version of the Swedish CoA, instead of revering my edits. I don't agree that the "version" of CoA, which you are promoting is official. Just because it's not against the legal recommendation, it's not official. Camptown 17:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the official version. The version that you're preposing is over 100 years old and not used anymore. /Slarre 17:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet the only official in the public domain. If you disagree, you should create an EXACT copy of what is used right now, and no home made crap. Camptown 17:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:United Nations Human Rights Council logo.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:United Nations Commission on Human Rights logo.png. The copy called Image:United Nations Commission on Human Rights logo.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PFLP-logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:PFLP-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CUF-logo.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:CUF-logo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CUF-logo.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:CUF-logo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Centerpartiet.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Centerpartiet.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Centerpartiet.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Centerpartiet.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 21:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 21:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sweden Democrats-2006logo.png

Hello Slarre, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Sweden Democrats-2006logo.png) was found at the following location: User:Slarre/SDtemp. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Swedish_Home_Guard.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swedish_Home_Guard.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 04:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 17:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nationalsocialistisk front.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nationalsocialistisk front.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 23:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Feministiskt initiativ.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ung Vänster.svg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ung Vänster.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kristdemokraterna.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kristdemokraterna.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Junilistan.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Junilistan.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Göteborg 2006 logo.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Göteborg 2006 logo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Labour (Israel).png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Labour (Israel).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TT-logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TT-logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:SAC-logo.svg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SAC-logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case you haven't noticed...

...I've answered your question about Swedish regiments a while ago, see my talk page. – Elisson • T • C • 17:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stockholm-Copenhagen

I think it is silly to make statements about biggest and best city in Scandinavia. If you think it is important to claim Stockholm to be the center of scandinavia, then I can easily find similar claims regarding Copenhagen. I dont find such a stupid competition particularly relevant or important. mvh --Rasmus81 03:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Everything that I added to the intro are properly sourced, undisputable facts. I've never claimed Stockholm to be the "center of scandinavia", just that the city itself brands it that way. /Slarre 11:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the brand is silly, childish and as a citizen of Copenhagen quite honestly also a bit offending. I dont think it fits in an article in Wikipedia. I could also start claiming things in the article about Copenhagen. I will do so if you still think it is really relevant to turn wikipedia into the place for swedish crazy-commercials and emphasize where Stockholm is "biggest" and "best" in Scandinavia.

"Copenhagen forms the densiest most populated area in Scandinavia and is furthermore center of the biggest metropolitan region in Scandinavia, Øresundsregionen, with over 3,5 million inhabitants. It is the highest ranked city in the Anholt City rank index in Scandinaviapol.dk." I think such information is commercial rather than information. mvh --Rasmus81 19:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sorry if you feel offended, but I didn't invent this brand. The article clearly says that this is a brand used specifically as a self-label by the City of Stockholm and nothing else. Furthermore, the label is not intended to be very serious and is rather used for commercial purposes, and of course it pisses some people off.

Besides, the Oresund Region is part of both Sweden and Denmark and does not belong to Copenhagen exclusively. /Slarre 21:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is a Danish-Swedish region, but I personally also know some people in Malmö who find the stockholmian commercial equally stupid. I still think it is a silly and childish stunt, and it doesnt qualify for wikipedia in my view. But you are right, no reason to feel offended. My Swedish friend from Malmö told me about this certain stockholmian narcissistic disease, and advised me to just ignore it :-) Anyhow, I will visit Stockholm in the summer, and despite our little dispute, I am really looking forward to it. Med vänlige hälsningar --Rasmus81 23:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're probobly right that it's a bit childish and silly, but as I said it shouldn't be taken that seriously but rather as a humuorous way (with a "twinkle in the eye" as we say) to advertise the city, plus it's always fun to tease some Nordic friends! :-) No offence though, hope you have a nice time in Stockholm! /Slarre 00:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well, sometimes some of us deserve to be teased :-) --Rasmus81 01:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Stockholm University seal.svg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Stockholm University seal.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Cucumber

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Boston Cucumber, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Breno ^talk 15:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchens - Anglo-American

Anglo-American isn't a nationality but it is an accurate description of Hitchens as he holds dual nationality. Cf. Salman Rushdie who is described as British-Indian, and I'm sure there are many other examples. Musungu jim 20:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British-American is a more precise description in this case, since Hitchens is of British nationality and not "Anglo". Anglo is an older term that is used more loosly, and usually refers to cultural or ethnic background rather than nationality. /Slarre 09:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo is an excepted alternative for English. What is a cultural and ethnic background if it isn't a national one? If it counts for anything Hitchens has stated that he prefers being called English to British.Musungu jim 21:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what Hitchens himself prefer to be called, Wikipedia is an independent encyclopedia and should use as formal and correct terms as possible. Again, Hitchens nationality isn't English/Anglo (there's no such thing as English citizenship) but British and American, therefor British-American is the adequate term here. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Opening paragraph. /Slarre 21:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. Your not disputing Hitchens being described as Anglo-American, simply his nationality being described as such.Musungu jim 12:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare page link addition

Please read the discussion page at the Shakespeare article and comment. Tom Reedy 12:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfax University and University of Fairfax

FYI: I have discovered that Fairfax University and University of Fairfax are two different institutions (the first one is a fraud and the second one is possibly legitimate), so I am separating the two articles. --orlady 17:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lars

You deleted the gallery here of the two other images by this artist. Any reasons? Also please use edit summaries explaining your edits especially when you remove material like this. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 03:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think it's necessary to just use one image in the article, more images is a bit too much and makes the article look a bit plotty. Also, as far as I can see none of the images are compatible with GFDL, so we should try to keep those images at absolute minimum. /Slarre 03:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Institutional art

Hi,

I deleted Institutional art, because it was too short and had almost no content.

If you can write article with significant content about this topic, you are welcome to create it again. --Amir E. Aharoni 16:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coat of arms of Ladonia.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Coat of arms of Ladonia.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bernadotte Counts of Wisborg

I am sorry, Slarre, but you are wrong. The Counts of Wisborg are not Swedish counts, they are Luxembourgish counts, being in the Luxembourgish nobility at all. Also, all of your initial moves were not discussed and have no backing in any of the Wikipedia conventions. The titles in the names are at the very least prescribed by WP:NC(NT), which goes into detail as to how noble titles are used in article names on Wikipedia. As for the other article, I cannot speak for them other than to say that it is possible they are anomalies or are far better known by those names. The common thing between these counts is that the removal of their royal titles is notable and their new titles are important to the content of the articles and to the article names. Charles 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slarre, you are wrong, please come to terms with it. You were wrong about Wikipedia practice, you are wrong when implying that the counts are counts in the Swedish nobility (a duke of British creation living in Canada for instance isn't part of the "Canadian nobility"), there are no applicable Swedish naming conventions on English Wikipedia and you are a hypocrite for moving those pages without discussion AGAINST naming conventions and then accusing me of it when WP:NC(NT) sets guidelines for the use of noble titles in article titles. A history of "controversial moves" is a common, lame and unoriginal argument in an attempt to discredit me but it only discredits you. If you wanted to be educated on the contents of archive 9, Cracow was about a bunch of editors tying to polonize titles, including an administrator who was subject to arbitration and Charles I of Austria vs Charles IV of Hungary was against Hungarian editor with pro-Hungarian vs English usage views. Get it? Because I'm not going to say it again. You are not welcome to post on my page if you are going to try to use previous baseless arguments to discredit me. Charles 21:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angående NSF

Tjena, han har förstorat det här i onödan, om du vill delta i diskussionen så skulle det vara uppskattat: WP:AN/I#Disruptive edits, removal of sourced material, POV-pushing, personal attack. — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 19:36 07 Nov, 2007 (UTC)

3RR Warning for Freedom House article

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Freedom House. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

Thanks, --69.218.58.44 (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, you were waiting to make that comment right? /Slarre (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, because I actually like how you reworked the first few sentences of the lead and the fact that you hadn't been reverting a lot. [[WP::LEAD]] does call for an overview with notable controversies and WP:3RR does state no three reversions to the article within 24 hours. The best place to continue discussion would probably be on the article's talk page.. --69.218.58.44 (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You got to be joking. You're engaging in edit war as much as I am. Why don't you just log in with your real user name or are you afraid that would expose your identity? /Slarre (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't post something over the 3RR limit and I was simply trying to follow the guidelines of [[WP::LEAD]]. Think whatever you want, I just didn't want it to escalate. The situation seems to have worked itself out.. --69.218.58.44 (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gender equality ministries

Hi Slarre -- You reverted a change to categories that I'd done to Category:Gender equality ministries. I added it to Category:Human rights organizations. "orgs" includes both government & non-government orgs for now, although i'll be working to split those up; is there some other reason that you thought that category was problematic? --Lquilter (talk) 03:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought that it was a bit odd to categorize a government ministry as an "organization", and also I don't think that gender equality has that much to do with human rights really. /Slarre (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Gender equality is usually considered part of women's rights, which is usually considered part of human rights. I understand that these may feel a bit attenuated, but as I'm going through and trying to get the organizations category into consistency, I think the subject linking is important. As for whether a ministry is an organization, the organizations tree is a mix of non-governmental and governmental organizations. That's also inconsistent at this point; ultimately there needs to be a good structure distinguishing governmental organizations from non-governmental organizations. For now, though, I think it's helpful to track them this way. If you don't have any further objections, I'm going to reinstate the categorization. --Lquilter (talk) 06:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fuat Deniz

Tjena, vill bara tacka dig för att du hjälpt till på den artikeln! — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 06:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tack! /Slarre (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain

... why my writing constitutes a personal attack? It makes absolutely no sense...--Leifern (talk) 22:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing me of promoting "nazi propaganda" when all I do is point to neutral facts is way out of the line. I agree with your political points (Quisling was a fascist, a mass murderer and not a legitimate political leader), however I don't want that point to be staten as a fact in violation of WP:NPOV. It's a well known fact that Quisling was the de facto head of government in Nazi-occupied Norway (not of the exiled government), just as Joseph Stalin was the de facto head of state of occupied Estonia. If you think that pointing this out is promoting nazi propaganda, then I don't feel any more need to discuss with you. Anyway, this isn't a very big issue for me and I won't engage in any edit wars over it. /Slarre (talk) 22:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote was that most Norwegians would consider giving Quisling any legitimacy neo-Nazi propaganda; this is also an objective fact. I made it quite clear that I did not want to speculate on your intentions. In addition to that, historians also agree that Quisling was Terboven's puppet, so if there was any de facto head of the power occuping Norway, it was Terboven, not Quisling. --Leifern (talk) 23:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Quisling was indeed Terboven's puppet. However, you have to differ between the head of state and head of government. As Minister President Quisling was indeed the leader of the occupying cabinet (government). How much power he had in reality is another question. /Slarre (talk) 00:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Proventus

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Proventus, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Proventus seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Proventus, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

America's mayor

A tag has been placed on America's mayor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of America's mayor

I have nominated America's mayor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. J-ſtan^Contribs_{User page} 18:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Reinfeldt Bush election campaign 2000.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Reinfeldt Bush election campaign 2000.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shinui_logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Shinui_logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swedish_Navy.svg

I have tagged Image:Swedish_Navy.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 13:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swedish_Armed_Forces.svg

I have tagged Image:Swedish_Armed_Forces.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 14:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Church_of_Sweden.svg

I have tagged Image:Church_of_Sweden.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 14:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swedish_Home_Guard.svg

I have tagged Image:Swedish_Home_Guard.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 14:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:National Democrats (Sweden).png)

Thanks for uploading Image:National Democrats (Sweden).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amnesty International.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amnesty International.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per Bylund

Hi Slarre, you nominated the Per Bylund article for deletion and have since been discussing the keep decision with the admin who closed the discussion User:Nihonjoe. I absolutely agree with you that this topic is not notable and I am equally frustrated that Nihonjoe refuses to name what sources he means when he claims that Bylund's notability has been proved. I would be very much willing to take this issue to WP:DRV. What do you think?--Carabinieri (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. Personally I don't think I want to engage in that discussion anymore though. I'm tired of getting accused (even by administrators) of being on some sort of "crusade" and personal "vendetta" against other people just because I question an article's notability (it should be noted here that I don't know Bylund personally and haven't even even met him, plus as a libertarian myself I probobly agree with him on many political issues, so these accusations are just simply preposterous). But of course you're very welcome to bring it to WP:DRV if you'd like, but personally I'm not so keen on engaging in that discussion anymore. /Slarre (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swedish_Air_Force.png

I have tagged Image:Swedish_Air_Force.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 20:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swedish_Army.svg

I have tagged Image:Swedish_Army.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 10:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marx-Muhammad Pact

An editor has nominated Marx-Muhammad Pact, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marx-Muhammad Pact and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Polisen.svg

I have tagged Image:Polisen.svg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 19:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on Islamofascism

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Islamofascism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

Note that, according to the article, the 2005 New Oxford American Dictionary has: "a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century." In general, we don't want to know better than such sources, whatever ideology you're carrying. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are an ignorant POV pusher and I don't care anything about you. /Slarre (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Slarre, these sources should make it abundantly clear that there is recognizable and verifiable controversy surrounding the the term Islamofascism. Regards:

From an editorialist for The Nation 1
From BBC News 2
From a publication of the Ludwig von Mises Institute 3
From the Boston Globe 4
From National Public Radio 5
From the Minnesota Daily 6
From the The Hill 7
From the The Dartmouth 8
From the The National Student News Service 9
From the Daily Bruin 10
From the Columbia Spectator 11
From the BC Heights 12
From the Harvard Crimson 13
From a random blog 14
From National Public Radio 15

On top of this I want to especially note both a conservative publication, The American Conservative, indicting the term and a liberal publication, The Nation, reporting on the controversy. Then there is of course the piece by Christopher Hitchens in Slate, defending the term. Please understand that I am not promoting either perspective here, simply showing you that the controversy is quite real. Regards.PelleSmith (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing my point. I'm not contesting that there are sources that say this is a "controversial" issue at all, yet I don't think we should use this label at Wikipedia. This word can undoubtly be used to promote a negative viewpoint, why else do you think we do not use this label on people? Almost all political issues are controversial in one way or another, but adding this label to the article gives very little understanding to the reader. /Slarre (talk) 14:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing the point. It is not a matter of what a handful of sources claim. This term is known for being a controversial one, just as The Last Temptation of Christ, is known for being a controversial book. Michael Moore is also known for being a controversial film maker. I would welcome calling him controversial in the lead of his entry. You need to read up on WP:BLP to get a better sense of why we don't call him controversial. Living people, like incorporated entitities and so on are a category to themselves in terms of what ways we can represent them because living people are capable of suing other individuals and institutions for libel, etc. And no not all political issues are controversial to the same extent at all. BTW, I didn't put controversial back in, but used the term "contested" instead. Cheers.PelleSmith (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting attempt

No idea if it will survive the AfD, but I thought I'll give you a good word for an interesting try to tackle a very problematic topic [1]. If it does survive, I suggest looking up a couple of documentaries on this very subject by David Aaronovitch... you can do this even during the AfD.
Cheers, Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 23:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stockholm University seal.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stockholm University seal.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Intifada

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Global Intifada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Plrk (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Livgardet.png

I have tagged Image:Livgardet.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Lokal _Profil 12:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no evidence in your source that Sibylla was a member of the Nazi party

I removed that part of the article, since that blog is not a reliable source and since it does not say that she was a member of the Nazi party. Her father was, yes. I don't like the king and the Swedish royal family, but that blog does not say anything about these things. It does not say that the Swedish press reported so in 1932. Whatever that blog says, it's not a reliable source. Calle Widmann (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, I will try to find a more reliable source. /Slarre (talk) 10:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Slarre. If you can prove that the King's mother used to be a member of the Nazi party I will be very happy, cause I don't like the Bernadotte family. Her father was, sure. And I would also be happy if I see some evidence that the Swedish press discussed this in 1932, when they got married. Take care! Calle Widmann (talk) 10:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Montage

Hi, sorry for the delay. I should check my talk page more often. I'm really glad to see more people opting for the montage format for city articles. I use MS Publisher, but there are numerous other programs that can used such as Photoshop, Adobe Pagemaker, GimpShop (you can download this for free), etc. Importing each image into these programs, after you set a black background, you'll be able to crop each independently. Then just save it as a Jpeg at the maximum resolution possible, and it should keep the full resolution of each photo. It takes a few hours to get it right, and my experience is that having the smallest separation between photos looks best. Hope that helps. --Jleon (talk) 02:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! I will see how this works out! :) /Slarre (talk) 15:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RAF & GDR

The reference you added to the article on the RAF about Rainer Röhl and Ulrike Meinhof refers to events that occurred before the RAF was founded and are therefore irrelevant to an article on the RAF. The RAF was founded in 1970, whereas Röhl and Meinhof separated in 1967 and divorced in 1968. If you can provide a justification for including the citation in this article as distinct from the ones on Meinhof or Röhl, please join the discussion on the RAF discussion page. There are IIRC other allegations that the RAF received support from the GDR (other than asylum for former members), but they need to be documented. --Mia-etol (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Agiza

There's no reason for two people to share the same article, we don't have Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz -- they weren't even siblings who had identical lives or anything -- the only thing they have in common is where they spent a few years. Please change it back so each has their own article to improve. Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 11:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that this article is not primarily about these two individuals as persons. It's about a political scandal that aroused in Sweden in 2004 when it was revealed that they had been - with the assist of CIA - secretly deported from Sweden to Egypt where they had been tortured. In Sweden this scandal has become known as Egyptenavvisningarna ("the Egyptian Extraditions"). These two persons are interdependent for their notability and information about them should be kept in the same article. However, maybe the name should be changed to Ahmed Agiza and Muhammad al-Zery extradition or Extradition of Ahmed Agiza and Muhammad al-Zery or something like that, to show what the focus of the article is about. /Slarre (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Friendship associations

Category:Friendship associations and it's sub-categories, some of which which you created, have been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SSU-logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SSU-logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beklager

De har tilsyneladende et problem med dette stykke. Okay fair nok, at det er copyright (syge vil omformulere det selv), men årsagen jeg sige det der er at sige klart, hvorfor København er den vigtigste business by (du skal ikke diskutere Stockholm skal du gå til København og se, hvor mange internationale hoveder for Skandinavien ligger der) det er en kendsgerning. Bedes du respektere Jeg elsker min by, og jeg tror, at dette er et vigtigt element i det. Respekt til dig for min ven, du gøre meget hjælp til wikipedia, og jeg er meget imponeret!! Tak Tom :)--Tom.magnussen (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't understand everything of what you write :( I hope that you agree with me though, and that this issue is resolved now. Thanks for your compliment also. Cheers, Slarre (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights: Harold Pinter

Please discuss here:

Hello, Slarre. You have new messages at Talk:Harold Pinter.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Folkpartiet.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Folkpartiet.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Lundström

More independent sources regarding Lundström's right wing affiliations [2] are needed, or I'm afraid that section has to go. --Hapsala (talk) 17:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lundström's connections to various anti-immigration/neofascist organizations are well known ([3][4][5][6][7][8]) Expo is a respected and widely sourced journal/organization. /Slarre (talk) 19:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. If you have additional sources, they also have to be included to support the allegations. A single source is not cool when it comes to allegations about dubious affiliations. --Hapsala (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Judisk Krönika and POV phrases

Hello Slarre, I noticed you created the article Judisk Krönika, which was good. However, I'm somewhat worried to see the obvious POV phrases you used - mainly "Zionist" and "mouthpiece". They're now adjusted, and I'm sure you're aware that phrases like that wouldn't "stick". If you could keep to NPOV phrases from the start in future article, you would save us all some time. Best regards, Tomas e (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry for that, it was definitely not my intention to write a "negative" article. The words that I used were the same ones as in the source (Nationalenycklopedin). According to http://lexin2.nada.kth.se/cgi-bin/sve-eng "språkrör" is translated as "mouthpiece" but I didn't notice it could also have a negative connotating. I don't see what's POV about "Zionist" though. /Slarre (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I'm very sorry, but I'm just too busy right now to take on any more work. Good luck with your article, tho! Scartol • Tok 11:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks anyway! :) /Slarre (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fredrik Reinfeldt GAR

Hi, letting you know that I've opened up a GAR for Fredrik Reinfeldt; you're the most significant contributor who's still active. Concerns are listed at Talk:Fredrik Reinfeldt/GA1. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Yusuf

The article Ahmed Yusuf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails: WP:N, WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IQinn (talk) 04:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Goulad Hassan Dourad's European years?

You started the article on Somali captive in Guantanamo Goulad Hassan Dourad. Much of your original contribution remains -- and it all has {{cn}} tags on it. Do you have references for that material? Geo Swan (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Slarre! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 289 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Birgitta Ohlsson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Caute - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Eviatar Manor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Osama Ali Maher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
America Vera Zavala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Gidehag - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dilsa Demirbag Sten - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Per Bauhn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Per Gahrton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Weil - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Raphaël Martinetti

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Young Greens of Sweden‎

The article Young Greens of Sweden‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:00, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dagens Nyheter logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dagens Nyheter logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Svenska Dagbladet logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Svenska Dagbladet logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LUF-logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LUF-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George W. Bush Street for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George W. Bush Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Kpalion^(talk) 07:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mattias Svensson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mattias Svensson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattias Svensson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grön Ungdom.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grön Ungdom.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vänsterpartiet.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vänsterpartiet.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikky Blond

The article Nikky Blond has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Claimed award appears to be a token trade show honorific, given out only twice in the award's two-decade history. Even if it were seen as a technical PORNBIO pass, that would be far outweighed by the complete failure to meet GNG requirements. No nontrivial pertinent GNews or Gbooks hits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikky Blond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikky Blond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikky Blond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Centerpartiet.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centerpartiet.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Israel national bobsleigh team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Israel national bobsleigh team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel national bobsleigh team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Young Republicans.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Young Republicans.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kristdemokraterna.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kristdemokraterna.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miljöpartiet.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miljöpartiet.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amnesty International.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amnesty International.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Feministiskt initiativ.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feministiskt initiativ.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:En svensk tiger.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:En svensk tiger.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Staffan Skott

The article Staffan Skott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see nothing to suggest notability. One reference just confirms that he has written something, whilst the other refers to his more famous wife

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deb (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CUF-logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CUF-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MUF-logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MUF-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shinui logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shinui logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom House logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freedom House logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Young Democrats of America.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Young Democrats of America.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supreme Court of Sweden.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supreme Court of Sweden.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Party name with colour

Template:Party name with colour has been nominated for merging with Template:Party name with color. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Swedish political parties shading key

Template:Swedish political parties shading key has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of President of Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article President of Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President of Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Helle Klein

The article Helle Klein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline (GNG). No external sources on page or can be found on a simple google search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]