African-American family structure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the history and consequences of the African-American family structure. For African-American nuclear family, see Nuclear Family.

E. Franklin Frazier has described the African-American family structure as having two models, one in which the father is viewed as a patriarch and the sole breadwinner, and one where the mother takes on a matriarchal role in the place of a broken household.[1] In defining family, James Stewart describes it as “an institution that interacts with other institutions forming a social network.”[2] Stewart research concludes that the African-American family has traditionally used this definition to structure institutions that upholds values tied to other black institutions resulting in unique societal standards that deal with “economics, politics, education, health, welfare, law, culture, religion, and the media.” [3] Ruggles states that the modern black family has seen a change in this tradition and is now viewed as predominantly single parent, specifically black matriarchy.[4]

History of the African-American family structure[edit]

A majority of African-American children are born into single-parent homes. Compared to white women, black women are more likely to become teenage mothers, stay single and have marriage instability, and are thus much more likely to live in female-headed single-parent homes.[5][6] This pattern has been coined as black matriarchy because of the observance of many households headed by women.[6] The issue was first brought to national attention in 1965 by sociologist and later Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, in the groundbreaking Moynihan Report (also known as "The Negro Family: The Case For National Action").[7] Moynihan's report made the argument that the relative absence of nuclear families (those having both a father and mother present) in Black America would greatly hinder further Black socioeconomic progress.[7]

The current most widespread African American family structure consisting of single-parent has historical roots, dating back to 1880.[4] Data from U.S. Census reports reveal that between 1880 and 1960, married households consisting of two-parent homes were the most widespread form of African American family structures.[4] Although the most popular, married households decreased over this time period. Single-parent homes, on the other hand, remained relatively stable until 1960 when they rose dramatically.[4] A study of 1880 family structures in Philadelphia showed that three-fourths of black families were nuclear families, composed of two parents and children.[8]

In New York City in 1925, 85% of kin-related black households had two parents.[8] When Moynihan warned in his 1965 report on the coming destruction of the black family, however, the out-of-wedlock birthrate had increased to 25% among blacks.[7] This figure continued to rise over time and in 1991, 68% of black children were born outside of marriage.[9] U.S. Census data from 2010 reveal that more African American families consisted of single-parent mothers than married homes with both parents.[10] Most recently, in 2011 it was reported that 72% of black babies were born to unwed mothers.[6]

The African-American family structure has been divided into a twelve-part typology that is used to show the differences in the family structure based on “gender, marital status, and the presence or absence of children, other relatives or nonrelatives."[11] These family sub-structures are divided up into three major structures: nuclear families, extended families, and augmented families.

African-American family at a glance[edit]

African-American nuclear families[edit]

Andrew Billingsley research on the African-American nuclear family is organized in three fashions: Incipient Nuclear, Simple Nuclear, Segmented Nuclear I, and Segmented Nuclear II.[11] In 1992 Paul Glick supplied statistics showing the African-American nuclear family structure was 80% of total African-American families in comparison to 90% of all US families.[12] According to Billingsley, the African-American incipient nuclear family structure is defined as a married couple with no children.[11] In 1992 Glick statistics shows 47% of African-American families were described as having an incipient nuclear family in comparison to 54% of all US incipient nuclear families.[13] The African-American simple nuclear family structure has been defined as a married couple with children.[11] According to Stewart, this is the traditional norm for African-American family compositions.[2] In 1992 Glick statistics show 25% of African-American families were simple nuclear families in comparison to 36% of all US families.[13] The African-American segmented nuclear I (unmarried mother and children) and II (unmarried father and children) family structures are defined as a parent-child relationship.[11] In 1992 Glick statistics show 94% of African-American segmented nuclear families were composed of an unmarried mother and children.[13] Glick research shows that single parent families are twice as prevalent in African-American families as they are in other races and this statistic continues to grow further apart.[12]

African-American extended families[edit]

Billingsley research continues with the African-American extended family structure, which is composed of primary members plus other relatives.[11] Extended families have the same sub-structures as nuclear families, incipient, simple, segmented I, and segmented II, but with the addition of grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins and additional family members. Billingsley research shows that the extended family structure is predominantly in the segmented I sub-structured families. In 1992 Paul Glick shows that 47% of all African-American extended families were segmented extended family structures compared to 12%of all other races combines.[14] Billingsley research shows that in the African-American family the extended relative is often the grandparents.[15]

African-American augmented families[edit]

Billingsley research uncovers the African-American augmented family structure, which is composed of the primary members plus nonrelatives.[11] Billingsley case study in Climbing Jacob's Ladder shows that in 1990 this family structure accounts for 8% of the total African-American families.[16] This family structure is different from the traditional norm family discussed earlier, it combines the nuclear and extended family units with nonrelatives. This structure also has the incipient, simple, segmented I, and segmented II sub-structures.[11]

In Billingsley case study he introduces a new family structure that branches from the augmented family structure.[16] The African-American population are starting to see a new structure known as a nonfamily household. This nonfamily household contains no relatives.[17] According to Glick in 1992, 37% of all households in the United States was a nonfamily household, while more than half of this percentage was African-Americans.[18]

African-American family members at a glance[edit]

Father representative[edit]

In 1997, McAdoo stated that African-American families are "frequently regarded as poor, fatherless, dependent of governmental assistance, and involved in producing a multitude of children outside of wedlock."[19] Thomas, Krampe and Newton show that in 2005 39% of African-American children did not live with their biological father and 28% of African-American children did not live with any father representative, compared to 15% of white children who was without a father representative.[20] In the African-American culture, the father representative has historically acted as a role model for two out of every three African-American children, yet there are still many who never have this opportunity.[21] Thomas, Krampe, and Newton relies on a 2002 survey that shows how the father lack of presence has resulted in several negative effects on children ranging from education performance to teen pregnancy.[22] Whereas the father presence tends to have an opposite effect on children, increasing their chances on have a greater life satisfaction. Thomas, Krampe, and Newton research shows that 31% of African-American fathers rarely to never go visit their children, this is 20% more than white fathers.[20] In 2001, Hamer showed that many African-American youth did not know how to approach their father when in his presence.[23] This survey also concluded that the non resident fathers who did go visit their child said that their role consisted of primarily spending time with their children, providing discipline and being a role model.[24] John McAdoo also been noted that the residential father role consists of being the provider and decision maker for the household.[25]

Mother representative[edit]

Melvin Wilson suggests that in the African-American family structure a mother's role is determined by her relation status, is she a single mother or a married mother? [26] According to Wilson, in most African-American married families a mother roles is dominated by her household responsibilities.[27] Wilson research states that African American married families, in contrast to White families, do not have gender specific roles for household services.[28] The mother and wife is responsible for all household services around the house.[27] According to Wilson, the married mother tasks around the house is described as a full-time job. This full-time job of household responsibilities is often the second job that an African- American women takes on.[28] The first job is her regular 8 hour work day that she spends outside of the home. Wilson also notes that this responsibility that the mother has in the married family determines the life satisfaction of the family as a whole.[28]

Melvin Wilson states that the single mother role in the African-American family is played by 94% of African-American single parents.[29] According to Brown, single parent motherhood in the African-American culture is becoming more a "proactive" choice.[30] Melvin Wilson research shows 62% of single African-American women said this choice is in response to divorce, adoption, or just non marriage compared to 33% of single white women.[31] In this position African-American single mothers see themselves playing the role of the mother and the father.[30] Though the role of a single mother is similar to the role of a married mother, to take care of household responsibilities and work a full-time job, the single mothers' responsibility is greater since she does not have a second party income that a partner would provide for her family members. According to Brown, this lack of a second party income has resulted in the majority of African American children raised in single mother households having a poor upbringing.[32]

Child[edit]

In Margaret Spencer case study on children living in southern metropolitan areas, she shows that children can only grow through enculturation of a particular society.[33] The child’s development is dependent on three areas: child-rearing practices, individual heredity, and experienced cultural patterns. Spencer's research also concludes that African-American children has become subject to inconsistencies in society based on their skin color.[34] These inconsistencies continue to place an increase amount of environmental stress on African-American families which result in the failure for most African-American children to reach their full potential.[35] Similar to most races, challenges that African-American families experience are usually dependent on the children's age groups.[36] The African-American families experience a great deal of mortality within the infant and toddler age group. In particular the infant mortality rate is “twice as high for black children as for children in the nation as a whole.”[36] The mortality in this age group is accompanied by a significant amount of illnesses in the pre- and post-natal care stages, along with the failure to place these children into a positive, progressive learning environments once they become toddlers.[37] This foundation has led to African-American children facing teen pregnancy, juvenile detention, and other behavioral issues because they were not given the proper development in order to successfully face the world and social inconsistencies they will encounter.[37]

Extended family members[edit]

Jones, Zalot, Foster, Sterrett, and Chester executed a study examining the childrearing assistance given to young adults and African-American single mothers.[38] The majority of extended family members, including aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents, and occasionally non-relatives, are put into this category.[39] In Jones research she also notes that 97% of single mother's ages 28–40 admitted that they rely on at least one extended family member for assistance in raising their children.[40] Extended family members have an immense amount of responsibility in the majority of African-American families, especially single parent households. According to Jones, the reason these extended family members are included in having a necessary role in the family is because they play a key role in assuring the health and well-being of the children.[39] The extended family members' responsibility range from child rearing, financial assistance, offering a place to live, and meals.[41]

Theories about African-American family structure[edit]

Economic explanations[edit]

There are several hypotheses-both social and economic- explaining the persistence of the current African-American family structure. Some researchers theorize that the low economic statuses of the newly freed slaves in 1850 lead to the current family structure for African Americans. These researchers suggest that extreme poverty has increased the destabilization of African American families while others point to high female labor participation, few job opportunities for black males, and small differences between wages for men and women that have decreased marriage stability for black families.[4]

Economic status has proved to not always negatively affect single-parent homes, however. Rather, in an 1880 census, there was a positive relationship between the number of black single-parent homes and per-capita county wealth.[4] Moreover, literate young mothers in 1880 were less likely to reside in a home with a spouse than illiterate mothers.[4] This suggests that economic factors following slavery alone, cannot account for the family styles seen by African Americans since blacks who were illiterate and lived in the worst neighborhoods were the most likely to live in a two-parent home.

Traditional African influences[edit]

Other explanations incorporate social mechanisms for the specific patterns of the African American family structure. Some researchers point to differences in norms regarding the need to live with a spouse and with children for African-Americans. Patterns seen in traditional African cultures are also considered a source for the current trends in single-parent homes. As noted by Antonio McDaniel, the reliance of African-American families on kinship networks for financial, emotional, and social support can be traced back to African cultures, where the emphasis was on extended families, rather than the nuclear family.[42]

It is believed by some researchers that these African traditions were modified by experiences during slavery, resulting in a current African-American family structure that relies more on extended kin networks.[42] The author notes that slavery caused a uniques situation for African slaves in that it alienated them from both true African and white culture so that slaves could not identify completely with either culture. As a result, slaves were culturally adaptive and formed family structures that best suit their environment and situation.[42]

Post-1960s expansion of the US welfare state[edit]

Economist Thomas Sowell argues that the significant expansion of federal welfare under the Great Society programs beginning in the 1960s contributed to the destruction of African American families.[43] Sowell has argued that "the black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life."[43]

There are several other factors which may have accelerated decline of the black family structure such as 1) The advancement of technology lessening the need for manual labor to more technical know-how labor; and 2) The women's rights movement in general opened up employment positions increasing competition, especially for white women, in many non-traditional areas which skilled blacks may have contributed from to maintain their family structure in the mist of the rise of the cost of living. [44]

Decline of black marriages[edit]

The rate of African American marriage is not only consistently lower than White Americans, but is also declining.[45] These trends are so pervasive that families who are married are considered a minority family structure for blacks.[45] In 1970, 64% of adult African Americans were married. This rate was cut in half by 2004, when 32% of adult African Americans were married.[45] Conversely, in 2004, 45% of African Americans had never been married compared to only 25% of White Americans.[45]

While research has shown that marriage rates have dropped for African Americans, the rate of birth has not. Thus, the number of single-parent homes has risen dramatically for black women.[46] One reason for the low rates of African American marriages is high age of first marriage for many African Americans. For African Americans women, the marriage rate increases with age compared to White Americans who follow the same trends but marry at younger ages than African Americans.[45]

One study found that the average age of marriage for black women with a high school degree was 21.8 years compared to 20.8 years for white women.[45] Fewer labor force opportunities and a decline in real earnings for black males since 1960, are also named as a source of increasing marital instability.[47] As some researchers argue, these two trends have led to a pool of fewer desirable male partners and thus resulted in more divorces.

One type of marriages that have declined are shotgun marriages.[48] This drop in rate is documented by the amount of out-of-wedlock births that now commonly occur.[48] Between 1965 and 1989, three-fourths of white out-of-wedlock births and three-fifths of black out-of-wedlock births could be explained by situations where the parents would have married in the past.[48] This is because, prior to the 1970s, the norm was such that, should a couple have a pregnancy out of wedlock, marriage was inevitable.[48] Cultural norms have since changed, giving women and men more agency to decide whether or when they should get married.[48]

Rise in divorce rates[edit]

For African Americans who do marry, the rate of divorce is higher than White Americans. While the trend is the same for both African Americans and White Americans, with at least half of marriages for the two groups ending in divorce, the rate of divorce tends to be consistently higher for African Americans.[45] African Americans also tend to spend less time married than White Americans. Overall, African Americans are married at a later age, spend less time married and are more likely to be divorced than White Americans.[45]

The decline and low success rate of Black marriages is crucial for study because many African Americans achieve a middle-class status through marriage and the likelihood for children growing up in poverty is tripled for those in single-parent rather than two-parent homes.[45] Some researchers suggest that the reason for the rise in divorce rates is the increasing acceptability of divorces. The decline in social stigma of divorce has led to a decrease in the number of legal barriers of getting a divorce, thus making it easier for couples to divorce.[47]

Black male incarceration and mortality[edit]

On June 30, 2006, an estimated 4.8% of black non-Hispanic men were in prison or jail, compared to 1.9% of Hispanic men of any race and 0.7% of white non-Hispanic men. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.[49]

Structural barriers are often listed as the reason for the current trends in the African American family structure, specifically the decline in marriage rates. Imbalanced sex ratios have been cited as one of these barriers since the late nineteenth century, where Census data revealed that, in 1840, there were 99 black males for every 100 black females within the population.[45] Recent Census data in 2003 revealed similar, yet worse findings as there were only 91 males for every 100 females.[45]

Black male incarceration and mortality rates are often pointed to for these imbalanced sex ratios. Although black males make up 6% of the population, they make up 50% of those who are incarcerated.[45] This incarceration rate for black males increased by a rate of more than four between the years of 1980 and 2003. Furthermore, the incarceration rate for African American males is 3,045 out of 100,000 compared to 465 per 100,000 White Americans males.[45] The chance of black males to be arrested and jailed at least once in their lifetime in many areas around the country is extremely high. For Washington DC, this probability is between 80 and 90%.[45]

The mortality rates for African American males are also typically higher than they are for African American females. Between the years 1980 and 2003, 4,744 to 27,141 more African American males died annually than African American females.[45] This high incarceration rate and mortality rate helps to explain the low marriage rates for many African American females who cannot find black mates.

Implications of the African-American family structure[edit]

The Moynihan Report, written by Assistant Secretary of Labor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, initiated the debate on whether the African-American family structure leads to negative outcomes, such as poverty, teenage pregnancy and gaps in education or whether the reverse is true and the African American family structure is a result of institutional discrimination, poverty and other segregation.[50] Regardless of the causality, researchers have found a consistent relationship between the current African American family structure and poverty, education, and pregnancy.[51] According to C. Eric Lincoln, the Negro family "enduring sickness" is the absent father from the African-American family structure.[52] C. Eric Lincoln also suggests that the implied American idea that poverty, teen pregnancy, and poor education performance has been the struggle for the African-American community is due to the absent African-American father. According to the Moynihan Report, the failure for a male dominated subculture, which only exist in the African-American culture, and reliance on the matriarchal control has been greatly present in the African-American family structure for the past three centuries.[53] This absence of the father, or "mistreatment", has resulted in the African-American crime rate being higher than the National average, African-American drug addiction being higher than whites, and rates of illegitimacy being at least 25% or higher than whites.[53] A family needs the presence of both parents for the youth to “learn the values and expectations of society.”[52]

Poverty[edit]

Black single-parent homes headed by women still demonstrate how relevant the feminization of poverty is. Black women continue to be relegated into low-paying and female-dominated occupations.[54] Black women also still make up a large percentage of poverty-afflicted individuals.[54] Additionally, the racialization of poverty in combination with the feminization of poverty creates further hindrances for youth growing up black, in single-parent homes, and in poverty.[54] For married couple families in 2007, there was 5.8% poverty rate.[55]

This number, however, varied when considering race so that 5.4% of all white individuals,[56] 9.7% of black individuals,[57] and 14.9% of all Hispanic individuals lived in poverty.[58] These numbers increased for single-parent homes, with 26.6% of all single-parent families lived in poverty,[55] 22.5% of all white single-parent individuals,[56] 44.0% of all single-parent black individuals,[57] and 33.4% of all single-parent Hispanic individuals [58] living in poverty.

While majority opinion tends to center on the increase in poverty as a result of single-parent homes, research has shown that this is not always the case. In one study examining the effects of single-parent homes on parental stress and practices, the researchers found that family structure and marital status were not as big of a factor as poverty and the experiences the mothers had while growing up.[59] Furthermore, the authors found little parental dysfunction in parenting styles and efficacy for single-mothers, suggesting that two-parent homes are not always the only type of successful family structures.[59] The authors suggest that focus be placed also on the poverty that African American face as a whole, rather than just those who live in single-parent homes and those that are of the typical African American family structure.[59]

Educational performance[edit]

There is consensus in the literature about the negative consequences of growing up in single-parent homes on educational attainment and success.[51] Children growing up in single-parent homes are more likely to not finish school and generally obtain less years of schooling than those in two-parent homes.[51] Specifically, boys growing in homes with only their mothers are more likely to receive poorer grades and display behavioral problems.[51]

For black high school students, the African American family structure does affect their educational goals and expectations also.[51] Studies on the topic have indicated that children growing up in single-parent homes faces disturbances in young childhood, adolescence and young adulthood as well.[51] Although these effects are sometimes minimal and contradictory, it is generally agreed that the family structure a child grows up in is important for their success in the educational sphere.[51] This is particularly important for African American children who have a 50% chance of being born outside of marriages and growing up in a home with a single-parent.[59]

Some of the arguments for the reasoning behind this drop in attainment for single-parent homes point to the socioeconomic problems that arise from mother-headed homes. Particularly relevant for families centered on black matriarchy, one theory posits that the reason children of female-headed households do worse in education is because of the economic insecurity that results because of single motherhood.[51] Single parent mothers often have lower incomes and thus may be removed from the home and forced to work more hours, and are sometimes forced to move into poorer neighborhoods with less educational resources.[51]

Other theories point to the importance of male role models and fathers in particular, for the development of children emotionally and cognitively, especially boys.[51] Even for fathers who may not be in the home, studies have shown that time spent with fathers has a positive relationship with psychological well-being including less depression and anxiety. Additionally, emotional support from fathers is related to fewer delinquency problems and drug and marijuana use.[60]

Teen pregnancy[edit]

Teenage and unplanned pregnancies pose threats for those who are affected by it with these unplanned pregnancies leading to greater divorces rates for young individuals who marry after having a child. In one study, 60% of the young married parents had separated within the first five years of marriage.[61] Additionally, as reported in one article, unplanned pregnancies are often cited as a reason for young parents dropping out, resulting in greater economic burdens and instabilities for these teenage parents later on.[61]

Another study found that paternal attitudes towards sexuality and sexual expression at a young age was more likely to determine sexual behaviors by teens regardless of maternal opinions on the matter.[61] For these youth, the opinions of the father affected their behaviors in positives ways, regardless whether the parent lived in or out of the home and the age of the student.[61] Another study looking at how mother-daughter relationships affect teenage pregnancy, found that negative parental relationships led to teenage daughters, dating later, getting pregnant earlier and having more sex partners.[62]

Additionally, teens who lived in a married family, have been shown to have a lower risk for teenage pregnancy; teenage girls in single-parent families were six times more likely to get pregnant and 2.8 times more likely to engage in sex at an earlier age than girls in married family homes.[63] For the majority of black youth who live in female-headed households, this finding points to the need for fathers to help curve the teen pregnancy rate and reduce the negative outcomes associated with youth pregnancy and the likelihood of single-parent homes.

Criticism and support of the African-American family structure[edit]

Cosby and Poussaint's Criticism of the single-parent family[edit]

Bill Cosby has criticised the current state of Black families being dominated by single-parent situations. In a speech to the NAACP in 2004, Cosby said "“In the neighborhood that most of us grew up in, parenting is not going on”. “You have the pile-up of these sweet beautiful things born by nature—raised by no one.”[64]

In Cosby's 2007 book Come On People: On the Path from Victims to Victors, co-authored with psychiatrist Alvin Poussaint, Cosby and Poussaint write that “A house without a father is a challenge,” and that “A neighborhood without fathers is a catastrophe.”[64] Cosby and Poussaint write that mothers “have difficulty showing a son how to be a man,” and that this presents a problem when there are no father figures around to show boys how to channel their natural aggressiveness in constructive ways.[64] Cosby and Poussaint also write, “We wonder if much of these kids’ rage was born when their fathers abandoned them.”[64]

Cosby and Poussaint state that verbal and emotional abuse of the children is prominent in the parenting style of some Black single mothers, with serious developmental consequences for the children.[64] “Words like ‘You’re stupid,’ ‘You’re an idiot,’ ‘I’m sorry you were born,’ or ‘You’ll never amount to anything’ can stick a dagger in a child’s heart.” [64] "Single mothers angry with men, whether their current boyfriends or their children’s fathers, regularly transfer their rage to their sons, since they’re afraid to take it out on the adult males"[64] Cosby and Poussaint write that this formative parenting environment in the Black single parent family leads to a "wounded anger—of children toward parents, women toward men, men toward their mothers and women in general".[64]

Research on the African-American Family[edit]

The Research on the African-American Family book, written by Robert Hill and published in 1968, provides a counterpoint to The Moynihan Report, or The Negro Family: The Case For National Action, which discusses how single-parent homes would be the undoing of the African American people. In this report, Hill writes in support of the African-American family, speaking about both the strengths and the difficulties in the African American home, detailing most of the positives of the African American family structure.[65]

In his report, Hill says Black families have five major strengths:[65]

  1. Strong religious orientation
  2. High Aspiration Rate: aspirations to achieve more than they "ought" to aspire considering situation
  3. Role Exchange: women are not afraid to support the family if men are not able.
  4. Kinship Circle: extended family in the black community
  5. Willingness to Work

Solutions[edit]

According to Angela Hattery and Earl Smith, there are solutions to the effects that African-Americans suffer in result to the African-American structures that are present in America.[66](pp285–315) Three of Hattery and Smith's solutions focus on parental support for children, equal access to education, and alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. According to Hattery and Smith, African-American families are within a system that is “pitted” against them and there are some institution solutions and individual solutions that America and its citizens can do to reduce implications associated with the African-American family structure.[66](p315)

Parental support for children[edit]

According to Hattery and Smith, around 50% of African-American children are poor because they are dependent on a single mother.[66](p305) In states like Wisconsin, in order for a child to be the recipient of welfare or receive the “bride fare”, their parents must be married.[66](p306) Hattery acknowledges one truth about this law, which is that it recognizes that a child is “entitled” to the financial and emotional support of both parents. One of Hattery and Smith's solutions is found around the idea that an African-American child is entitled to the financial and emotional support of both parents. The government does require the noncustodial parents to pay a percentage to their child every month, but according to Hattery the only way this will help eliminate child poverty is if these policies are actively enforced.[66](p306)

Education equality[edit]

For the past 400 years of America’s life many African-Americans have been denied the proper education needed to provide for the traditional American family structure.[66](p308) Hattery suggests that the schools and education resources available to most African-American are under equipped and unable provide their students with the knowledge needed to be college ready.[66](p174) In 2005 The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research report showed that even though integration has been a push more recently, over the past 15 years there has been a 13% decline in integration in public schools.[66](p174) These same reports also show that in 2002, 56% of African-American students graduated from high school with a diploma, while 78% whites students graduated. If students do not feel they are learning, they will not continue to go to school. This conclusion is made from the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research report that stated only 23% of African-American students who graduated from public high school felt college ready.[66](p174) Hatterly suggests the government invest into the African-American family by investing in the African-American children’s education.[66](p308) A solution is found in providing the same resources provided to schools that are predominantly white. According to Hatterly, through education equality the African-American family structure can increase opportunity to prosper with equality in employment, wages, and health insurance.[66](p308)

Alternatives to incarceration[edit]

According to Hattery and Smith 25-33% of African-American men are spending time in jail or prison and according to Thomas, Krampe, and Newton 28% of African-American children do not live with any father representative.[20][66](p310) According to Hatterly, the government can stop this experience that many African-American children experience due to the absence of their father.[66](pp285–315) Hatterly suggests probation or treatment (for alcohol or drugs) as alternatives to incarceration. Incarceration not only continues the negative assumption of the African-American family structure, but perpetuates poverty, single parenthood, and the separation of family units.[66](p310)

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Stewart, James (1990). "Back to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois's and Frazier's Contributions for Contemporary Research on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart. Black Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 12. 
  2. ^ a b Stewart, James (1990). "Back to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois's and Frazier's Contributions for Contemporary Research on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart. Black Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 10. 
  3. ^ Stewart, James (1990). "Back to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois's and Frazier's Contributions for Contemporary Research on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart. Black Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 20. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Ruggles, S. (1994). The origins of African-American family structure. American Sociological Review, 136-151.
  5. ^ Morgan, S.; Antonio McDaniel; Andrew T. Miller; Samuel H. Preston. (1993). "Racial differences in household and family structure at the turn of the century". American Journal of Sociology: 799–828. 
  6. ^ a b c Washington, Jesse (2010-11-06). "Blacks struggle with 72 percent unwed mothers rate - Boston.com". AP. Retrieved 31 July 2014. 
  7. ^ a b c Daniel P. Moynihan, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, Washington, D.C., Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor, 1965.
  8. ^ a b "Victimhood: Rhetoric or reality?", Walter Williams, Jewish World Review, June 8, 2005.
  9. ^ National Review, April 4, 1994, p. 24.
  10. ^ Lofquist, Daphne; Terry Lugaila, Martin O’Connell, and Sarah Feliz. "Households and Families: 2010". US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Briefs. Retrieved 15 April 2013. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h Billingsley, Andrew (1992). Climbing Jacob's Ladder. New York, New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 32. 
  12. ^ a b Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 119. ISBN 0803955723. 
  13. ^ a b c Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 120. ISBN 0803955723. 
  14. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. pp. 119–120. ISBN 0803955723. 
  15. ^ Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder : the enduring legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 42. ISBN 067167708X. 
  16. ^ a b Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder : the enduring legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 44. ISBN 067167708X. 
  17. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 124. ISBN 0803955723. 
  18. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 121. ISBN 0803955723. 
  19. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 529. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  20. ^ a b c Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 536. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  21. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 531. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  22. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 541. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  23. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 542. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  24. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies 38 (4): 544. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. 
  25. ^ John McAdoo, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. pp. 184–186. ISBN 0803955723. 
  26. ^ Wilson, Melvin (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 5–22. ISBN 0787999164. 
  27. ^ a b editor, Melvin N. Wilson, (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 9. ISBN 0787999164. 
  28. ^ a b c editor, Melvin N. Wilson, (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 10. ISBN 0787999164. 
  29. ^ editor, Melvin N. Wilson, (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 7. ISBN 0787999164. 
  30. ^ a b Burgess, edited by Norma J.; Brown, Eurnestine (2000). African American women : an ecological perspective. New York [u.a.]: Falmer Press. p. 59. ISBN 0815315910. 
  31. ^ editor, Melvin N. Wilson, (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 6–7. ISBN 0787999164. 
  32. ^ Burgess, edited by Norma J.; Brown, Eurnestine (2000). African American women : an ecological perspective. New York [u.a.]: Falmer Press. pp. 58–59. ISBN 0815315910. 
  33. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Black families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2. print. ed.). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers. pp. 111–112. ISBN 0887388124. 
  34. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Black families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2. print. ed.). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers. p. 112. ISBN 0887388124. 
  35. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Black families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2. print. ed.). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers. pp. 124–125. ISBN 0887388124. 
  36. ^ a b Billingsley, Andrew (1992). Climbing Jacob's Ladder. New York, New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 58. 
  37. ^ a b Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder : the enduring legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 60–61. ISBN 067167708X. 
  38. ^ Jones, Deborah J.; Zalot, Alecia A.; Foster, Sarah E.; Sterrett, Emma; Chester, Charlene (22 December 2006). "A Review of Childrearing in African American Single Mother Families: The Relevance of a Coparenting Framework". Journal of Child and Family Studies 16 (5): 671–683. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9115-0. 
  39. ^ a b Jones, Deborah J.; Zalot, Alecia A.; Foster, Sarah E.; Sterrett, Emma; Chester, Charlene (22 December 2006). "A Review of Childrearing in African American Single Mother Families: The Relevance of a Coparenting Framework". Journal of Child and Family Studies 16 (5): 673. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9115-0. 
  40. ^ Jones, Deborah J.; Zalot, Alecia A.; Foster, Sarah E.; Sterrett, Emma; Chester, Charlene (22 December 2006). "A Review of Childrearing in African American Single Mother Families: The Relevance of a Coparenting Framework". Journal of Child and Family Studies 16 (5): 676. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9115-0. 
  41. ^ Jones, Deborah J.; Zalot, Alecia A.; Foster, Sarah E.; Sterrett, Emma; Chester, Charlene (22 December 2006). "A Review of Childrearing in African American Single Mother Families: The Relevance of a Coparenting Framework". Journal of Child and Family Studies 16 (5): 674. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9115-0. 
  42. ^ a b c McDaniel, Antonio (1990). "The Power of Culture: A Review of the Idea of Africa’s Influence on Family Structure in Antebellum America". Journal of Family History 15 (2): 225–238. doi:10.1177/036319909001500113. 
  43. ^ a b War on Poverty Revisited Thomas Sowell, August 17, 2004
  44. ^ MacLean, Nancy. The American Women's Movement, 1945–2000: A Brief History with Documents (2008)
  45. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Dixon, P. (2009). Marriage among African Americans: What does the research reveal?. Journal of African American Studies, 13(1), 29-46.
  46. ^ David T. Euwood and Christopher Jencks (2004). Kathryn M. Neckerman, ed. Social Inequality. Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN 978-0871546210. 
  47. ^ a b Ruggles, Steven (1997). "The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990". Demography 34 (4): 455–466. doi:10.2307/3038300. 
  48. ^ a b c d e Akerlof, G. A., Yellen, J. L., & Katz, M. L. (1996). An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 277-317.
  49. ^ Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (NCJ 217675). U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Male incarceration by race. The percentages are for adult males, and are from page 1 of the PDF file.
  50. ^ Rose M. Rivers, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo; John Scanzoni (1997). Black families (3. ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 334. ISBN 0803955723. 
  51. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Heiss, Jerold (August 1996). "Effects of African American Family Structure on School Attitudes and Performance". Social Problems 43 (3): 246–267. doi:10.2307/3096977. 
  52. ^ a b Staples, [compiled by] Robert (1998). The Black family : essays and studies (6th ed. ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co. pp. 343–349. ISBN 9780534552961. 
  53. ^ a b Staples, [compiled by] Robert (1998). The Black family : essays and studies (6th ed. ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co. pp. 37–58. ISBN 9780534552961. 
  54. ^ a b c Claude, J. (1986). Poverty patterns for Black men and women. The Black Scholar, 17(5), 20-23.
  55. ^ a b U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey. People in Families by Family Structure, Age, and Sex, Iterated by Income-to-Poverty Ratio and Race: 2007: Below 100% of Poverty – All Races.
  56. ^ a b U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey. People in Families by Family Structure, Age, and Sex, Iterated by Income-to-Poverty Ratio and Race: 2007: Below 100% of Poverty – White Alone.
  57. ^ a b "Poverty 3-Part 100_06". Pubdb3.census.gov. 2008-08-26. Retrieved 2010-09-16. 
  58. ^ a b "Poverty 2-Part 100_09". Pubdb3.census.gov. 2008-08-26. Retrieved 2010-09-16. 
  59. ^ a b c d Cain, D. S., & Combs-Orme, T. (2005). Family structure effects on parenting stress and practices in the African American family. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 32, 19.
  60. ^ Zimmerman, M. A.; Salem, D. A.; Maton, K. I. (1995). "Family Structure and Psychosocial Correlates among Urban African‐American Adolescent Males". Child Development 66 (6): 1598–1613. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00954.x. "Regardless of the causality, researchers have found a consistent relationship between the current African American family structure and poverty, education, and pregnancy." 
  61. ^ a b c d Dittus, P. J., Jaccard, J., & Gordon, V. V. (1997). The impact of African American fathers on adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(4), 445-465.
  62. ^ Scott, Joseph (1993). "African American Daughter-Mother Relations and Teenage Pregnancy: Two Faces of Premarital Teenage Pregnancy.". Western Journal of Black Studies 17 (2). 
  63. ^ Moore, Mignon; P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale (2001). "Sexual Intercourse and Pregnancy among African American Girls in High-Poverty Neighborhoods: The Role of Family and Perceived Community Environment". Journal of Marriage and Family 63 (4). 
  64. ^ a b c d e f g h Magnet, Myron (2008). "The Great African-American Awakening". City Journal 18 (3). 
  65. ^ a b Hill, Roberty. esearch on the African-American Family: A Holistic Perspective. Praege. ISBN 978-0865690219. 
  66. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Hattery, Angela J.; Smith, Earl (2007). African American families. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. ISBN 9781412924665.