Social history of post-war Britain (1945–1979)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lfstevens (talk | contribs) at 14:22, 13 September 2017 (→‎Educational reform: rem jargon). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Modern Britain
8 May 1945 – present
Monarch(s)
Leader(s)
Chronology
Second World War

The social history of the United Kingdom from 1945 began with the aftermath of the Second World War. The United Kingdom was one of the victors, but victory was costly in human and economic terms. Thus, the late 1940s was a time of austerity and economic restraint, which gave way to prosperity in the 1950s. The Labour Party held control from 1945–51, and granted independence to India in 1947. Most of the other major colonies became independent in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Britain collaborated closely with the United States during the Cold War after 1947, and in 1949 helped form NATO as a military alliance against Soviet Communism. After a long debate and initial scepticism, the UK joined the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973, but voted to leave the European Union (EU) in 2016. Immigration from South Asia, the West Indies, and Eastern Europe produced a multicultural society, while traditional Anglican and other denominations of Christianity declined sharply.

Prosperity returned in the 1950s, reaching the middle class and, to a large extent, the working class across Britain. London remained a world centre of finance and culture, but the nation was no longer a superpower. In foreign policy Britain promoted the Commonwealth (in the economic sphere) and the Atlantic Alliance (in the military sphere). In domestic policy a Post-war consensus saw the leadership of the Labour and Conservative parties largely agreed on Keynesian policies, with support for trades unions, regulation of business, and nationalisation of many older industries. The discovery of North Sea oil eased some financial pressures, but the 1970s saw slow growth, higher unemployment, and escalating labour strife. Deindustrialisation or the loss of heavy industry, especially coal mining, shipbuilding and manufacturing, grew worse after 1970 as Britain's economy shifted to services. London and the south east maintained prosperity as London became the leading financial center in Europe and played a major world role. Higher education expanded rapidly and attracted an international clientele, while debates raged on the elitist effect of grammar schools. The status of women slowly improved. A youth culture emerged in the 1970s with such iconic international celebrities as The Beatles and Princess Diana. Conservative prime minister, Margaret Thatcher (1979-1990) rejected the post-war consensus in the 1980s, denationalised most industries, and worked to weaken the power of the unions. The "New Labour" premiership of Tony Blair (1997-2007) accepted most of Thatcher's economic policies. Devolution became a major topic, as Scotland and Wales gained more local control. In 2014, Scotland voted 55% to 45% to remain in the UK.

Post-war era

Age of Austerity

Clement Attlee was Prime Minister from 1945 to 1951.

In May 1945, the governing coalition dissolved, triggering the long-overdue 1945 general election.[1] Labour won just under 50% of the vote and a majority of 145 seats.[2] The new Prime Minister Clement Attlee proclaimed, "This is the first time in the history of the country that a labour movement with a socialist policy has received the approval of the electorate."[3]

During the war, surveys showed public opinion moving to the left and in favour of wide social reform.[4] The public associated the Conservative Party with the poverty and mass unemployment of the inter-war years.[5] Historian Henry Pelling, noting that polls showed a steady Labour lead after 1942, points to the usual swing against the party in power; the Conservative loss of initiative; wide fears of a return to the high unemployment of the 1930s; the theme that socialist planning would be more efficient in operating the economy; and the mistaken belief that Churchill would continue as prime minister regardless of the result.[6] The sense that all Britons had joined in a "People's War" and all deserved a reward animated voters.[7]

As the war ended and American Lend Lease suddenly and unexpectedly ended,[8] the Treasury was near bankruptcy and Labour's new programmes would be expensive.[9] The economy did not reach prewar levels until the 1950s. The immediate post-war years were called the Age of Austerity.[10]

The war almost bankrupted Britain, while the country maintained a global empire in an attempt to remain a global power.[11] For instance, it opearted a large air force and a conscript army.[12] Without Lend Lease, bankruptcy loomed. The government pleaded secured a low-interest $3.75 billion loan from the US in December 1945.[13] Rebuilding necessitated fiscal austerity in order to maximise export earnings, while Britain's colonies and other client states were required to keep their reserves in pounds as "sterling balances".[14] Additional finance – which did not have to be repaid – came from the Marshall Plan in 1948–50, which also required Britain to modernise its business practices and remove trade barriers.[15] Britain was an enthusiastic supporter of the Marshall Plan, and used it as a lever to more directly promote European unity and the NATO military alliance which was formed in 1949.[16]

Rationing and conscription continued in the post-war years[17][18] as the government tried to control demand[19] and normalise the economy. Anxieties were heightened when the country suffered one of the worst winters on record in 1946–47: the coal and railway systems failed, factories closed, and a large proportion of the population suffered due to the cold.[20]

Rationing

Wartime rationing continued, and was for the first time extended to bread in order to feed the German civilians in the British sector of occupied Germany.[21] During the war, the government had banned ice cream and rationed sweets, such as chocolates and confections; all sweets were rationed until 1954.[22] Most people grumbled, but for the poorest, rationing was beneficial, because their rationed diet was of greater nutritional value than their pre-war diet. Housewives organised to oppose the austerity.[23] The Conservatives gained support by attacking socialism, austerity, rationing and economic controls and returned to power in 1951.[24]

Morale was boosted by the marriage of Princess Elizabeth to Philip Mountbatten in 1947,[25] The 1948 Summer Olympics were held in London.[26] Reconstruction had begun in London, but no funding was available for new facilities.[27]

Welfare state

A British 1948 National Insurance stamp, which workers had to purchase to contribute to benefits and pensions.

The most important Labour initiatives were the expansion of the welfare state, the founding of the National Health Service and nationalisation of the coal, gas, electricity, railways and other primary industries. The welfare state was expanded by the National Insurance Act 1946, which built upon the comprehensive system of social security originally set up in 1911.[28] People of working age had to pay a weekly contribution (by buying a stamp) and in return were entitled to a wide range of benefits, including a pension, health and unemployment benefits, and widows' benefits.[29]

The National Health Service began operations in July 1948.[30] It promised to give cradle to grave free hospital and medical care for everyone in the country, regardless of income. Labour went on to expand low cost council housing for the poor.[31]

The Treasury, headed by Chancellor of the Exchequer Hugh Dalton, faced urgent problems. Half of the wartime economy had been devoted to mobilising soldiers, warplanes, bombs and munitions; a transition to a peacetime budget was begun, while attempting to control inflation.[32] New loans from the US and Canada to replace Lend Lease were essential to sustain living conditions.[33]

Housing

Housing was a critical shortage.[34] Air raids had destroyed a half million housing units; upgrades and repairs on undamaged units had been postponed.[35] Three quarters of a million new dwellings were needed.[36] The government aimed for 300,000 annually,[37] compared to the maximum prewar rate of 350,000. However, shortages of construction workers, materials,[38] and money limited progress.[33] Not counting 150,000 temporary prefabricated units, the shortage reached 1.5 million units by 1951.[39] Legislation kept rents down,[40] but did not lead to an increase in the number of new homes. The ambitious New Towns project did not provide enough units.[41] The Conservatives made housing a high priority and oversaw 2.5 million new units, two thirds of them through local councils. Haste made for dubious quality, and policy increasingly shifted toward renovation rather than new construction. Slums were cleared, opening the way for gentrification in the inner cities.[42]

Nationalisation

Martin Francis argues there was Labour Party consensus by 1945, both on the National Executive Committee and at party conferences, on a definition of socialism that stressed moral as well as material improvement. The Attlee government was committed to rebuilding British society as an ethical commonwealth, using public ownership and controls to abolish extremes of wealth and poverty. Labour's ideology contrasted sharply with the contemporary Conservative Party's defence of individualism, allowing people to keep much of the wealth they had created, inherited privileges and income inequality.[43]

Attlee's government nationalised major industries and utilities. It developed and implemented the "cradle to grave" welfare state conceived by liberal economist William Beveridge. The creation of Britain's publicly funded National Health Service under health minister Aneurin Bevan remains Labour's proudest achievement.[44]

However, the Labour Party had developed no detailed plans nationalization plans.[45] Improvising, they started with the Bank of England, civil aviation, coal and Cable and Wireless. Then came railways, canals, road haulage and trucking, electricity, and gas. Finally came iron and steel, which was a special case because it was a manufacturing industry. Altogether, about one fifth of the economy was taken over. Labour dropped the notion of nationalising farms.

On the whole nationalisation went smoothly, with two exceptions. Nationalising hospitals was strongly opposed by practising physicians. Compromises allowed them also to have a private practice, and the great majority decided to work with the National Health Service. Much more controversial was the nationalisation of the iron and steel industry — unlike coal, it was profitable and highly efficient. Nationalisation was opposed by industry owners and executives, the business community as a whole and the Conservative Party as a whole. The House of Lords was also opposed, but the Parliament Act 1949 reduced its power to delay legislation to just one year. Finally in 1951, iron and steel were nationalised, but then Labour lost its majority. The Conservatives in 1955 returned them to private ownership.[46]

The procedure used was developed by Herbert Morrison, who as Lord President of the Council chaired the Committee on the Socialisation of Industries. He followed the model that was already in place of setting up public corporations such as the BBC in broadcasting (1927). The owners of corporate stock were given government bonds, and the government took full ownership of each affected company, consolidating it into a national monopoly. The managers remained the same, only now they became civil servants working for the government. For the Labour Party leadership, nationalisation was a way to consolidate economic planning. It was not designed to modernise old industries, make them efficient, or transform their organisational structure. There was no money for modernisation, although the Marshall Plan, operated separately by American planners, did force many British businesses to adopt modern managerial techniques. Old line British Marxists were fervent believers in dialectical materialism and in fighting against capitalism and for workers' control, trade unionism, nationalisation of industry and centralized planning. They were now disappointed, as the nationalised industries seemed identical to the old private corporations, and national planning was made virtually impossible by the government’s financial constraints. At Oxford a "New Left" started to emerge that rejected old-line approaches.[47] Socialism was in place, but it did not seem to make a major difference. Rank-and-file workers had long been motivated to support Labour by tales of the mistreatment of workers by foremen and management. The foremen and the managers were the same people as before, with much the same power over the workplace. There was no worker control of industry. The unions resisted government efforts to set wages. By the time of the general elections in 1950 and 1951, Labour seldom boasted about its nationalisations. Instead Conservatives decried the inefficiency and mismanagement, and promised to reverse the treatment of steel and trucking.[48][49]

Labour weaknesses

Labour struggled to maintain its support. Realising the unpopularity of rationing, in 1948–49 the government ended the rationing of potatoes, bread, shoes, clothing and jam, and increased the petrol ration for summer drivers. However, meat was still rationed, and in very short supply, at high prices.[50] Militant socialist Aneurin Bevan, the Minister of Health, said at a party rally in 1948, "no amount of cajolery... can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party.... They are lower than vermin." Bevan, a coal miner's son, had gone too far in a land that took pride in self-restraint, and he never lived down the remark.[51]

Labour narrowly won the 1950 general election with a majority of five seats. Defence became one of the divisive issues for Labour itself, especially defence spending, which reached 14% of GDP in 1951 during the Korean War. These costs strainws public finances. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Hugh Gaitskell, introduced prescription charges for NHS dentures and spectacles, leading Bevan, along with Harold Wilson (President of the Board of Trade) to resign. A decade of turmoil ensued in the Party, much to the advantage of the Conservatives who won again and again by ever larger majorities.[52]

David Kynaston argues that the Labour Party under Prime Minister Attlee was led by conservative parliamentarians who always worked through constitutional parliamentary channels; they saw no need for large demonstrations, boycotts or symbolic strikes. The result was a solid expansion and coordination of the welfare system, most notably the concentrated and centralised NHS. Private sector nationalisation focused on older, declining industries, most notably coal mining. Labour kept promising systematic economic planning, but never established adequate mechanisms. Much of the planning was forced upon them by the Marshall Plan, which insisted on a modernisation of business procedures and government regulations.[53] The Keynesian model accepted by Labour emphasised that planning could be handled indirectly through national spending and tax policies.[54]

Cold War

Britain faced severe financial constraints, lacking cash for needed imports. It responded by reducing its international entanglements as in Greece, and by sharing the hardships of an "age of austerity."[55] Early fears that the US would veto nationalisation or welfare policies proved groundless.[56]

Under Attlee foreign policy was the domain of Ernest Bevin, who looked for innovative ways to bring western Europe together in a military alliance. One early attempt was the Dunkirk Treaty with France in 1947.[57] Bevin's commitment to the West European security system made him eager to sign the Treaty of Brussels in 1948. It drew Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg into an arrangement for collective security, opening the way for the formation of NATO in 1949. NATO was primarily aimed as a defensive measure against Soviet expansion, while helping bring its members closer together and enabled them to modernise their forces along parallel lines, also encouraging arms purchases from Britain.[58]

Bevin began the process of dismantling the British Empire when it granted independence to India and Pakistan in 1947, followed by Burma (Myanmar) and Ceylon (Sri Lanka) in 1948.[59] In January 1947, the government decided to proceed with the development of Britain's nuclear weapons programme, primarily to enhance Britain's security and also its status as a superpower. A handful of top elected officials made the decision in secret, ignoring the rest of the cabinet, in order to forestall the Labour Party's pacifist and anti-nuclear wing.[60]

Return of Churchill

In the late 1940s the Conservative Party exploited and incited growing public anger at food rationing, scarcity, controls, austerity and omnipresent government bureaucracy. They used the dissatisfaction with their opponent's socialist and egalitarian policies to rally middle-class supporters and score a political victory at the 1951 general election. Their appeal was especially effective to housewives, who faced more difficult shopping conditions after the war than during it.[61]

The 300-foot Skylon hung in midair at the Festival of Britain, 1951.

The Labour Party kept slipping, interrupted by good moments such as the Festival of Britain in summer 1951, a national exhibition and fair held throughout the country. Historian Kenneth O. Morgan says the Festival was a "triumphant success" as every day thousands:

flocked to the South Bank site [in London], to wander around the Dome of Discovery, gaze at the Skylon, and generally enjoy a festival of national celebration. Up and down the land, lesser festivals enlisted much civic and voluntary enthusiasm. A people curbed by years of total war and half-crushed by austerity and gloom, showed that it had not lost the capacity for enjoying itself....Above all, the Festival made a spectacular setting as a showpiece for the inventiveness and genius of British scientists and technologists.[62]

The Conservative Party restored its credibility on economic policy with the Industrial Charter written by Rab Butler, which emphasised the importance of removing unnecessary controls, while going far beyond the laissez-faire attitude of old towards industrial social problems. Churchill was party leader, but he brought in a Party Chairman to modernise the institution. Lord Woolton was a successful department store owner and wartime Minister of Food. As Party Chairman 1946–55, he rebuilt its local organisations with an emphasis on membership, money and a unified national propaganda appeal on critical issues. To broaden the base of potential candidates, the national party provided financial aid and assisted local organisations in raising local money. Lord Woolton emphasised a rhetoric that characterised the opponents as "Socialist" rather than "Labour." The libertarian influence of Professor Friedrich Hayek's 1944 best-seller Road to Serfdom was apparent in the younger generation, but that took another quarter century to have a policy impact. By 1951, Labour's factions were bitterly divided.

The Conservatives narrowly won the October 1951 election, although Labour got considerably more votes. Most of the new programmes passed by Labour were accepted by the Conservatives and became part of the "post war consensus" that lasted until the 1970s.[63] The Conservatives ended rationing and reduced controls, and sold the famous Skylon for scrap. They were conciliatory towards unions and retained nationalisation and the welfare state, while privatising the steel and road haulage industries in 1953.[64]

Golden age

In the 1950s, rebuilding continued, and immigrants from Commonwealth nations, mostly from the Caribbean and the Indian subcontinent, began arriving in a steady flow. The shock of the Suez Crisis of 1956 made clear that Britain had lost its role as a superpower. It already knew it could no longer afford its large Empire. This led to decolonisation, and a withdrawal from almost all of its colonies by 1970.

In 1957 Prime Minister Macmillan boasted:[65]

Let us be frank about it: most of our people have never had it so good. Go round the country, go to the industrial towns, go to the farms and you will see a state of prosperity such as we have never had in my lifetime – nor indeed in the history of this country.

Unemployment figures[66] show that unemployment was significantly lower during the Golden Age than before or after:

Epoch Date range Percentage of British labour force unemployed.
Pre Golden Age 1921–1938 13.4
Golden Age 1950–1969 1.6
Post Golden Age 1970–1993 6.7

In addition to superior economic performance, other social indexes were higher in the golden age; for example, the proportion of Britain's population saying they are "very happy" registered at 52% in 1957 bu fell to just 36% in 2005.[67][68]

The 1950s and 1960s experienced continued modernisation of the economy.[69] Representative was the construction of the first motorways. Britain maintained and increased its financial role in the world economy, and used the English language to promote its educational system to students from around the globe. With relatively low unemployment during this period, the standard of living continued to rise, with new private and council housing developments increasing and the number of slum properties diminishing.

During the period, unemployment in Britain averaged only 2%. As prosperity returned after the war, Britons became more family-centred.[70] Leisure activities became more accessible to more people. Holiday camps, which had first opened in the 1930s, became popular holiday destinations in the 1950s – and people increasingly had the ability to pursue personal hobbies. The BBC's early television service was given a major boost in 1953 with the coronation of Elizabeth II, attracting a worldwide audience of twenty million, plus tens of millions more by radio. Many middle-class people bought televisions to view the event. In 1950 just 1% owned television sets; by 1965 25% did, and many more were rented. As austerity receded after 1950 and consumer demand kept growing, the Labour Party hurt itself by shunning consumerism as the antithesis of the socialism it demanded.[71]

Small neighbourhood shops were increasingly replaced by chain stores and shopping centres. Cars were becoming a significant part of British life, with city-centre congestion and ribbon developments springing up along major roads. These problems led to the idea of a green belt to protect the countryside, which was at risk from development of new housing units.[72]

The post-war period witnessed a dramatic rise in the average standard of living, with a 40% rise in average real wages from 1950 to 1965.[73] Workers in traditionally poorly paid semi-skilled and unskilled occupations saw a particularly marked improvement in their wages and living standards. Consumption, became more equal, especially as the landed gentry was pressed to pay its taxes and had to reduce its level of consumption. The rise in wages spurred consumer spending to increase by about 20% during the period, while economic growth continued at about 3%. The last food rations were ended in 1954, along with hire-purchase controls. As a result of these changes, large numbers of the working classes were able to participate in the consumer market for the first time.[74] The number one major purchase was a washing machine. Ownership jumped from 18 percent in 1955 to 29 percent in 1958 and 60 percent in 1966.[75]

Various fringe benefits became more common. In 1955, 96% of manual labourers were entitled to two weeks' holiday with pay, compared with 61% in 1951. By the end of the 1950s, Britain had become one of the world's most affluent countries, and by the early Sixties, most Britons enjoyed a level of prosperity that had previously been the privilege of only a small minority.[76] For the first time in decades, the young and unattached had spare cash for leisure, clothes and even luxuries. In 1959, Queen magazine declared that "Britain has launched into an age of unparalleled lavish living." Average wages were high while jobs were plentiful, and people saw their personal prosperity climb even higher. Prime Minister Harold Macmillan claimed that "the luxuries of the rich have become the necessities of the poor." As summed up by R. J. Unstead,

Opportunities in life, if not equal, were distributed much more fairly than ever before and the weekly wage-earner, in particular, had gained standards of living that would have been almost unbelievable in the thirties.[77]

Labour historian Martin Pugh stated:

Keynesian economic management enabled British workers to enjoy a golden age of full employment which, combined with a more relaxed attitude towards working mothers, led to the spread of the two-income family. Inflation was around 4 per cent, money wages rose from an average of £8 a week in 1951 to £15 a week by 1961, home-ownership spread from 35 per cent in 1939 to 47 per cent by 1966, and the relaxation of credit controls boosted the demand for consumer goods.[78]

By 1963, 82% of all private households had a television, 72% a vacuum cleaner, 45% a washing machine, and 30% a refrigerator. John Burnett notes that ownership had spread down the social scale so that the gap between consumption by professional and manual workers had considerably narrowed. The provision of household amenities steadily improved in the late decades of the century. From 1971 to 1983, households having the sole use of a fixed bath or shower rose from 88% to 97%, and those with an internal WC from 87% to 97%. In addition, the number of households with central heating almost doubled during that same period, from 34% to 64%. By 1983, 94% of all households had a refrigerator, 81% a colour television, 80% a washing machine, 57% a deep freezer, and 28% a tumble-drier.[79]

From a European perspective, however, Britain was not keeping pace. Between 1950 and 1970, it was overtaken by most of the countries of the European Common Market in terms of telephones, refrigerators, television sets, cars and washing machines per household.[80] Education grew, but not as fast as in rival nations. By the early 1980s, some 80% to 90% of school leavers in France and West Germany received vocational training, compared with 40% in the United Kingdom. By the mid-1980s, over 80% of pupils in the United States and West Germany and over 90% in Japan stayed in education until the age of eighteen, compared with barely 33% of British pupils.[81] In 1987, only 35% of 16-18-year-olds[where?] were in full-time education or training, compared with 80% in the United States, 77% in Japan, 69% in France, and 49% in the United Kingdom.[82]

1970s economic crises

In comparing economic prosperity (using gross national product per person), the British record was one of steady downward slippage from seventh place in 1950, to 12th in 1965, to 20th in 1975. Labour politician Richard Crossman, after visiting prosperous Canada, returned to England with a

sense of restriction, yes, even of decline, the old country always teetering on the edge of a crisis, trying to keep up appearances, with no confident vision of the future.[83]

Economists provided four overlapping explanations. The "early start" theory said that Britain's rivals were doing so well because they were still moving large numbers of farm workers into more lucrative employment, which Britain had done in the 19th century. A second theory emphasised the "rejuvenation by defeat", whereby Germany and Japan had been forced to re-equip, rethink and restructure their economies. The third approach emphasised the drag of "imperial distractions", saying that responsibilities to its large empire handicapped the home economy, especially through defence spending, and economic aid. Finally, the theory of "institutional failure" stressed the negative roles of discontinuity, unpredictability, and class envy. The last theory blamed trade unions, public schools, and universities for perpetuating an elitist anti-industrial attitude.[84]

In the 1970s the exuberance and the radicalism of the 1960s ebbed. Instead a mounting series of economic crises, including many trade union strikes, pushed the British economy further and further behind European and world growth. The result was a major political crisis, and a Winter of Discontent in the winter of 1978–79, when widespread strikes by public sector trade unions seriously inconvenienced and angered the public.[85]<[86]

Historians Alan Sked and Chris Cook summarise the general consensus of historians regarding Labour in power in the 1970s:

If Wilson's record as prime minister was soon felt to have been one of failure, that sense of failure was powerfully reinforced by Callaghan's term as premier. Labour, it seemed, was incapable of positive achievements. It was unable to control inflation, unable to control the unions, unable to solve the Irish problem, unable to solve the Rhodesian question, unable to secure its proposals for Welsh and Scottish devolution, unable to reach a popular modus vivendi with the Common Market, unable even to maintain itself in power until it could go to the country and the date of its own choosing. It was little wonder, therefore, that Mrs. Thatcher resoundingly defeated it in 1979.[87]

Bright spots included large deposits of oil that were found in the North Sea, allowing. Britain to become a major oil exporter to Europe in the era of the 1970s energy crisis.[88]

Long term economic factors

While economic historians concentrate on statistical parameters, cultural historians added to the list of factors to explain Britain's long-term relative economic decline. According to Peter Hennessy, these include:

  • Excessive trade union power
  • Too much nationalisation
  • Insufficient entrepreneurship
  • Too many wars, both hot and cold
  • The distraction of imperialism
  • A feeble political class
  • A weak civil service
  • An enduring aristocratic tradition disparaged management
  • Weak vocational education at all levels
  • Social class rigidities interence wiith progress."[89]

Northern Ireland and the Troubles

In the 1960s, moderate Unionist Prime Minister of Northern Ireland Terence O'Neill tried to reform the system and give a greater voice to Catholics, who comprised 40% of the population of Northern Ireland. His goals were blocked by militant Protestants led by Reverend Ian Paisley.[90] The increasing pressures from nationalists for reform and from unionists for "No surrender" led to the appearance of the civil rights movement under figures such as John Hume and Austin Currie. Clashes escalated out of control, as the army could barely contain the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and the Ulster Defence Association. British leaders feared their withdrawal would lead to a "doomsday scenario", with widespread communal strife, followed by the mass exodus of hundreds of thousands of refugees. London shut down Northern Ireland's parliament and began direct rule. By the 1990s, the failure of the IRA campaign to win mass public support or achieve its aim of a British withdrawal led to negotiations that in 1998 produced the 'Good Friday Agreement'. This won popular support and largely ended the most violent aspects of The Troubles.[91][92]

Social and cultural forces

Youth culture

Starting in the late 1960s the counterculture movement spread from the US like a wildfire.[93] Bill Osgerby argues that:

the counterculture's various strands developed from earlier artistic and political movements. On both sides of the Atlantic the 1950s "Beat Generation" had fused existentialist philosophy with jazz, poetry, literature, Eastern mysticism and drugs – themes that were all sustained in the 1960s counterculture.[94]</ref>

Britain did not experience the intense social turmoil produced in America by the Vietnam War and racial tensions. Nevertheless, British youth readily identified with their American counterparts' desire to cast off the older generation's social mores. Music was a powerful force. British groups and stars such as The Beatles, Rolling Stones, The Who, Pink Floyd and many others gained huge followings in the UK and around the world, leading young people to question convention in everything from clothing to the class system.[95][96]

The antiwar movement in Britain closely collaborated with their American counterparts, moving from an emphasis on nuclear war with Russia, to support for insurgents in the Southeast Asian jungles.[97]

Secularisation

Historians agree that in the late 1940s Britain was a Christian nation, with its religiosity reinforced by the wartime experience. Peter Forster found that in answering pollsters, the British reported an overwhelming belief in the truth of Christianity, a high respect for it, and a strong association between it and moral behaviour.[98] Peter Hennessy argued that long-held attitudes did not stop change; by mid-century "Britain was still a Christian country only in a vague attitudinal sense, belief generally being more a residual husk than the kernel of conviction."[99] Kenneth O. Morgan agreed, noting that "the Protestant churches, Anglican, and more especially non-conformist, all felt the pressure of falling numbers and of secular challenges....Even the drab Sabbath of Wales and Scotland was under some threat, with pressure for opening cinemas in Wales and golf-courses in Scotland."[100]

Brian Harrison reports that the forces of secularisation grew rapidly, and by the 1990s Protestantism was a shadow of its 1945 strength. Compared to Western Europe, Britain stood at the lower end of attendance at religious services, and near the top in people claiming "no religion". While 80% of Britons in 1950 said they were Christians, only 64% did so in 2000. Harrison states:

By every measure (number of churches, number of parish clergy, church attendance, Easter Day communicants, number of church marriages, membership as a proportion of the adult population) the Church of England was in decline after 1970. In 1985 there were only half as many parish clergy as in 1900.[101]

Roman Catholicism held up, thanks initially to immigration from Ireland and later from Poland.[102] What had been tiny clusters of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists grew enormously through immigration.[103] [104]

Trends

Population of religious groups in Britain[105] 1970 1993
Jews 450,000 300,000
Muslim 250,000 1,000,000
Sikh 75,000 300,000
Hindu 50,000 320,000
Buddhist 6,000 25,000

The Muslim population of England and Wales was over 50 times larger in 2011 compared to 50 years before. Sophie Gilliat-Ray attributes the growth to "recent immigration, the growing birth rate, some conversion to Islam, and perhaps also an increased willingness to self-identify as 'Muslim' on account of the 'war on terror'."[106]

Census year Number of
Muslims[107][108]
Population of
England & Wales
% of
population
Registered
mosques
1961 50,000 46,196,000 0.11% 7
1971 226,000 49,152,000 0.46% 30
1981 553,000 49,634,000 1.11% 149
1991 950,000 51,099,000 1.86% 443
2001 1,600,000 52,042,000 3.07% 614
2011 2,706,000 56,076,000 4.83 1,500

Status of women

The 1950s was a bleak period for feminism. In the aftermath of World War II, a new emphasis was placed on companionate marriage and the nuclear family as a foundation of the new welfare state.[109]

In 1951, the proportion of adult women who were (or had been) married was 75%; more specifically, 84.8% of women between the ages of 45 and 49 were married.[110] At that time: “marriage was more popular than ever before.”[111] In 1953, a popular book of advice for women states: “A happy marriage may be seen, not as a holy state or something to which a few may luckily attain, but rather as the best course, the simplest, and the easiest way of life for us all”.[112]

While at the end of the war, childcare facilities were closed and assistance for working women became limited, the social reforms implemented by the new welfare state included family allowances meant to subsidise families, that is, to support women in their “capacity as wife and mother.”[113] Sue Bruley argues that “the progressive vision of the New Britain of 1945 was flawed by a fundamentally conservative view of women”.[114]

Women's commitment to companionate marriage was echoed by the popular media: films, radio and popular women's magazines. In the 1950s, women's magazines had considerable influence on forming opinion in all walks of life, including the attitude to women’s employment.

Nevertheless, 1950s Britain moved to equal pay for teachers (1952) and for men and women in the civil service (1954), thanks to activists like Edith Summerskill.[115] Barbara Caine argues: “Ironically here, as with the vote, success was sometimes the worst enemy of organised feminism, as the achievement of each goal brought to an end the campaign which had been organised around it, leaving nothing in its place.”[116]

Feminist writers of the early postwar period, such as Alva Myrdal and Viola Klein, started to allow for the possibility that women should be able to combine home duties with outside employment. Feminism was strongly connected to social responsibility and involved the well-being of society as a whole. This often came at the cost of the liberation and personal fulfillment of self-declared feminists. Even those women who regarded themselves as feminists strongly endorsed prevailing ideas about the primacy of children’s needs, as advocated, for example, by John Bowlby the head of the Children's Department at the Tavistock Clinic and by Donald Winnicott.[117]

Equal pay entered the agenda in the 1959 General Election, when the Labour Party's Manifesto proposed a charter of rights including 'the right to equal pay for equal work'. Polls in 1968-9 showed public opinion moving in favour of equal pay for equal work; nearly three-quarters of those polled favoured the principle. The Equal Pay Act 1970 was passed by a Labour government with Conservative support; it took effect in 1975. Women’s wages for like work rose sharply from 64% in 1970 to 74% by 1980, then stalled because of high unemployment, and public-sector cuts that hit women working part-time.[118][119]

Sexual revolution

In the 1960s the generations divided sharply regarding sexual freedoms demanded by youth that disrupted long-held norms.[120]

Sexual norms changed rapidly. One notable event was the publication of D. H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover by Penguin Books in 1960. Although first printed in 1928, the release in 1960 of an inexpensive paperback prompted a court case. The prosecutor's question, "Would you want your wife or servants to read this book?" highlighted how far society had changed, and how little some people had noticed. The book was seen as one of the first events in a general relaxation of sexual attitudes. The national media, based in London with its more permissive social norms, led in explaining and exploring the new permissiveness.[121]

Other elements of the sexual revolution included the development of the contraceptive pill, Mary Quant's miniskirt and the partial decriminalisation of male homosexuality in 1967. The incidence of divorce and abortion rose along with a resurgence of the women's liberation movement, whose campaigning helped secure the Equal Pay Act 1970 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

Irish Catholics, traditionally the most puritanical of the ethno-religious groups, eased up a little, especially as the membership disregarded the bishops' teaching that contraception was sinful. doi 10.1093/tcbh/hww051[122]

The feminist movement drew inspiration primarily from the United States, and from the experience of left-wing British women experiencing discrimination by male activists. Efforts to form a national movement in the mid-1970s foundered on a bitter split between the (predominantly heterosexual) socialists, and the (predominantly lesbian) radicals. The most visible spokesperson was Germaine Greer, whose The Female Eunuch (1970) called on women to rebel against marriage and instead live in heterosexual communes. Paul Addison concludes that," in popular culture, feminism was generally treated as a bit of a joke."[123]

Margaret Thatcher received scant credit from feminists for breaking the ultimate glass ceiling, because she avoided feminism, and expressed a masculine persona.[124][125]

Educational reform

The Education Act of 1944 was an answer to surging social and educational demands created by the war and the widespread demands for social reform that approached utopianism.[126] It was prepared by Conservative Rab Butler after wide consultation. The Act took effect in 1947 and created the modern split between primary education and secondary education at age 11; it also established the Tripartite System, consisting of grammar schools, secondary modern schools and secondary technical schools. Academically gifted students who passed an exam were able to attend a prestigious grammar school. Those who did not pass the selection test attended secondary modern schools or technical schools. Compulsory education was extended to age 15.[127] The new law was widely praised by Conservatives because it honoured religion and social hierarchy, by Labour because it opened new opportunities for the working class, and by the general public because it eliminated education fees.[128] The act became a permanent part of the Post-war consensus supported by the three major parties.[129][130]

While the new law formed a part of the widely accepted Post-war consensus, one part generated controversy. Critics on the left attacked grammar schools as elitist because 11-year old students had to pass a test to enroll. Defenders, mostly in the Conservative party, argued that grammar schools allowed pupils to obtain a good education through merit rather than through family income. By 1964 one in10 students were in comprehensive schools that did not employ an entrance examination.[131] When Thatcher became education minister in 1970, one in three schools were comprehensives; The proportion doubled by 1974, despite her efforts to suport grammar schools. By 1979, over 90 percent of the schools were comprehensives.[132]

Higher education

Higher education expanded dramatically. Provincial university colleges were upgraded as at Nottingham, Southampton and Exeter. By 1957, 21 universities operated. Expansion came even faster in the 1960s, with new universities such as Keele, Dundee, East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Sussex and York — bringing the total to 46 in 1970. Specialisation allowed national centres of excellence to emerge in medicine at Edinburgh, engineering at Manchester, science at Imperial College London, and agriculture at Reading. Oxford and Cambridge, however, remained intellectually, culturally and politically dominant. They attracted top students from across the Commonwealth, but lost many of their best researchers to the United States, where salaries and research facilities were much more ample. Into the 1960s, student bodies remained largely middle and upper class; the average enrollment was only 2600 in 1962. Every subsequent decade brought further expansion in numbers of institutions and students.[133] Tuition fees were introduced in 1998, raised to £3,000 a year in 2006, and passed £9,000 a year by 2006.[134] The tendency toward vocationalism and the decline in the humanities remained controversial, as well as a growing mindset among senior administrators that became preoccupied with marketing (rankings) and accountability.[135]

Media

For the BBC the central postwar mission was to block threats from American private broadcasting and to continue John Reith’s mission of cultural uplift.[136] BBC remained a powerful force, despite the arrival of a private TV network in the 1950s.[137] Newspaper barons had less political power after 1945. Stephen Koss explains that the decline was caused by structural shifts: the major Fleet Street papers became properties of large, diversified capital empires with more interest in profits than politics. The provincial press virtually collapsed, with only the Manchester Guardian playing a national role; in 1964 it relocated to London. Growing competition arose from non-political journalism and from other media such as the BBC; independent press lords emerged who were independent of the political parties.[138]

Sport

Spectator sports became increasingly fashionable in postwar Britain, as attendance soared across the board.[139] Despite the omnipresent austerity, the government were very proud to host the 1948 Olympics, even though Britain's athletes won only three gold medals compared to 38 for the Americans.[140] Budgets were tight and no new facilities were built. Athletes were given the same bonus rations as dockers and miners, 5,467 calories a day instead of the normal 2,600. Athletes were housed in existing accommodation. Male competitors stayed at nearby RAF and Army camps, while the women were housed in London dormitories.[141] Sporting competitions were minimal during the war years, but by 1948, 40 million a year were watching football matches, 300,000 per week went to motorcycle speedways and half a million watched greyhound races. Cinemas were jammed and dance halls were filled. The great cricket hero Denis Compton was widely celebrated; the Daily Telegraph reported he:

made his run gaily and with a smile. His happy demeanour and his good looks completed a picture of the beau ideal of a sportsman. I doubt if any game at any period has thrown up anyone to match his popular appeal in the England of 1947-1949.[142]

Football

The most popular sport in the UK became association football; Sheffield F.C., founded in 1857, is the world's oldest football club. The home nations all have separate national teams and domestic competitions, most notably England's Premier League and FA Cup, and the Scottish Premiership and Scottish Cup. Referred to as the "home of football" by the international governing body FIFA, England hosted and won the 1966 FIFA World Cup. The English Premier League (formed in 1992 by member clubs of the old Football League First Division) is the most-watched football league in the world. Its biggest clubs include Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur.[143] Scotland's Celtic and Rangers also have a global fanbase.[144] Football in Britain is renowned for the intense rivalries between clubs and the passions of their supporters, which includes a tradition of football chants, such as, "You're Not Singing Any More" (or its variant "We Can See You Sneaking Out!"), sung by jubilant fans towards the opposition fans who have gone silent (or left early). Fans lined up for meat pies, burgers and chips. Football dropped its ban on floodlights in 1950, and night games attracted increasingly large crowds of fans – some of them unruly — as well as large television audiences. Architects were challenged to build ever-larger stadia, as "their cantilevered constructions dwarfing mean streets, supplanted the cathedral as symbol of the city's identity and aspirations, and the fixtures surpassed church festivals in their national impact."[145]

The British Disease: football hooliganism

The so-called "British Disease" was hooliganism at football fixtures. Rowdiness had been a characteristic for decades, but by the 1970s confrontations had escalated into violence against visiting fans, including violence at matches held in Europe. An in-depth study made in 1983 by High Court judge Sir Oliver Popplewell found that many hooligans held steady jobs; they dressed in the latest style, and planned their violence ahead of time as a recreation in itself, to which football was a mere background. They were not poor and were searching for an identity more lively than their mundane working environment. By the 1990s, hooliganism had been sharply reduced, thanks to the use of seating-only stadiums where each spectator had to remain in an assigned seat, better policing methods, and the use of closed-circuit television to identify troublemakers.[146][147]

Other sports

Cricket is Britain's other historic sport, but it grew faster in the overseas empire, and increasingly immigrants comprised the ranks of top players and fan base.[148] Tennis spread from upper-class estates into clubs in middle-class suburbs, where it became a woman's specialty.[149] Women increasingly frequented gyms, which sprang up everywhere; by the mid-1990s one of six members were women.[150] Middle-class men and women were rather more active than the working class. Scotland remains the headquarters of golf, many clubs opened up by 1910 and continue to operate. The number of golfers doubled in the 1950s from a half-million to a million, mostly men; the total reached 2.5 million by 2000.[151]

Cinema

The United Kingdom has had a significant film industry for over a century.[152] While film output peaked in 1936, the "golden age" of British cinema occurred in the 1940s, during which the directors David Lean, Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger, Carol Reed and Richard Attenborough produced their most highly acclaimed work. Many postwar British actors achieved international fame and critical success, including Maggie Smith, Michael Caine, Sean Connery, Kate Winslet and Ben Kingsley.[153] A handful of the films with the largest ever box office returns have been made in the United Kingdom, including the second and third highest-grossing film series (Harry Potter and James Bond).[154]

The identity of the British industry, and its relationship with the much larger and richer cinema of the United States, has been the subject of debate. Film production in Britain has often been affected by attempts to compete with the American industry. The career of the producer Alexander Korda was marked by this objective, the Rank Organisation attempted to compete in the 1940s, and Goldcrest in the 1980s. Numerous British-born directors, including Alfred Hitchcock and Ridley Scott,[155] and performers, such as Charlie Chaplin[156] and Cary Grant, achieved success primarily through their work in Hollywood.

In 2009 British films grossed around $2 billion worldwide and achieved a market share of around 7% globally and 17% in the United Kingdom.[157] UK box-office takings totalled £1.1 billion in 2012,[158] with 172.5 million admissions.[159]

Immigration

After decades of low immigration, new arrivals became a significant factor after 1945. Immigration before 2000 was greatest from the former British Empire especially Ireland, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Caribbean, South Africa, Kenya and Hong Kong. Since 2000, large numbers have arrived from Europe and the Middle East.[160] Of the 56,267,000 people in Britain in 1996, 52,942,000 were white. The other 3,307,000 represented diverse ethnic or racial origins: 875,000 were black; 1,639,000 were Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi; 126,000 were Chinese; 161,000 were other Asian; 506,000 were from other groups or were mixed.[161]

Some immigrants have come as asylum seekers, seeking protection as refugees under the United Nations 1951 Refugee Convention, or from member states of the European Union, exercising one of the European Union's Four Freedoms. Since the 1980s, however, Britain has become a leading proponent of European restrictionalism and has developed policies that tend to exclude asylum seekers from mainstream society. Dispersal policy was set up through the National Asylum Support Service programme so that asylum seekers were directed to urban areas that had available housing, although possibly because of a weak job market. While newly arrived asylum seekers and refugees had both skills and qualifications, they experienced high levels of unemployment, or else found mostly low-skilled jobs with low earnings. Public opinion in host areas turned against them.[162][163]

The new immigrants generally entered tight-knit ethnic communities. For example, the new Irish arrivals became integrated within a working-class Irish Catholic environment that shaped their behaviour whilst maintaining a distinct ethnic identity in terms of religion, culture and Labour politics.[164]

Spouses form the largest single category of migrant settlement, especially Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women. For them it is a matter of restoring domestic relations in a familiar family environment, with higher incomes, thus easing the strain on the immigration process.[165][166]

Fertility rates among new immigrants were much higher than the British norm (reflecting the norms of the country of origin). However, rates dropped rapidly with the length of stay in Britain. For some ethnic groups fertility reached about the level of the UK national average (e.g., black Caribbean) or below it (e.g., Indian and Chinese). Only among Pakistani and Bangladeshi women have total fertility rates remained well above the national average, but even so they have shown a continuous decrease since the 1970s.[167]

Enoch Powell (1912 – 1998), a Conservative Party MP, broke from the broad consensus supporting immigration in April 1968 to warn of long-term violence, unrest and internal discord should immigration continued from non-white areas. His speech foresaw "rivers of blood" and predicted that white "native" English citizens would be unable to access social services and be overwhelmed by foreign cultures. While political, social and cultural elites were harshly critical of Powell and he was removed from the Shadow Cabinet, Powell developed substantial public support.[168]

Thatcher's Britain

Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990

Margaret Thatcher was the dominant political force of the late 20th century, often compared to Churchill and David Lloyd George for her transformative agenda. She was Leader of the Conservative Party from 1975 to 1990, and Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990. She was often called the "Iron Lady" for her uncompromising politics and leadership style.[169]

Political analyst Dennis Kavanagh concludes that the "Thatcher Government produced such a large number of far-reaching changes across much of the policy spectrum, that it passes 'reasonable' criteria of effectiveness, radicalism, and innovation."[170]

The Labour party under James Callaghan (prime minister 1976–79) contested the May 1979 general election as unemployment passed the one-million mark and unions became more aggressive. The Conservatives used a highly effective poster created by advertisers Saatchi and Saatchi, showing a dole queue snaking into the distance, carrying the caption "Labour isn't working". Voters gave Conservatives 43.9% of the vote and 339 seats to Labour's 269, for an overall majority of 43 seats. Labour was weakened by the steady long-term decline in the proportion of manual workers in the electorate. Twice as many manual workers normally voted Labour as voted Conservative, but they now constituted only 56% of the electorate. When Harold Wilson won narrowly for Labour in 1964, they had accounted for 63%. Furthermore, they were beginning to turn against the trade unions – alienated, perhaps, by the difficulties of the winter of 1978–9. In contrast, Tory policies stressed wider home ownership, which Labour refused to match. Thatcher did best in districts where the economy was relatively strong and was weaker where it was contracting.[171]

Thatcherism

As Prime Minister, she implemented policies that became known as Thatcherism. After leading her Conservative party to victory, Thatcher introduced political and economic initiatives intended to reverse high unemployment and Britain's struggles with the Winter of Discontent and an ongoing recession. Her political philosophy and economic policies emphasised deregulation (particularly of the financial sector), flexible labour markets, the privatisation of state-owned companies and reducing the power and influence of trade unions. Due to recession and high unemployment, Thatcher's popularity during her first years in office waned until the beginning of 1982, a few months before the Falklands War. She won re-election in 1983.[172]

Privatisation was an enduring legacy of Thatcherism; it was later accepted by the Labour administration of Tony Blair. Her policy was to privatise nationalised corporations (such as telephone and aerospace firms). She further sold public housing to tenants, all on favourable terms. The policy developed an important electoral dimension during the second Thatcher government (1983–90). It involved more than denationalisation: wider share ownership was the second plank of her policy.[173] Thatcher advocated an "enterprise society" in Britain, especially in widespread share-ownership, personal ownership of council houses, marginalization of trade unions and expansion of private health care. These policies transformed British society.[174]

Foreign policy

Thatcher was distrustful of the European Union and did not try to forge closer relations. Her major breakthrough in foreign policy came in the long-distance war against Argentina for control of the Falkland Islands.[175] Thatcher then played a role in winning the Cold War. When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, she provided support for U.S. President Jimmy Carter's responses, such as the 1980 Olympic boycott. However, Britain's precarious economic situation allowed only tepid backing of Carter's attempt to punish Moscow through economic sanctions.[176] She collaborated closely with Ronald Reagan in confronting the Soviets. She was the first major western leader to identify Mikhail Gorbachev as a potential negotiating partner. She was annoyed by Reagan's invasion of Grenada (a member of the Commonwealth), and lukewarm support regarding the Falklands.[177]

Thatcher was re-elected for a third term in 1987. During this period her support for a Community Charge (popularly referred to as "poll tax") was widely unpopular and her views on the European Community were not shared by others in her Cabinet. She lost the support of Conservative party leaders and had to resign as Prime Minister and party leader in November 1990.

Cultural movements

The environmentalism movements of the 1980s reduced the emphasis on intensive farming, and promoted organic farming and conservation of the countryside.[178]

Protestant religious observance declined notably in Britain during the second half of the 20th century. Catholicism (based on the Irish elements) held its own, while Islam grew rapidly. Church of England attendance particularly dropped, although charismatic churches like Elim and AOG grew. The movement to Keep Sunday Special seemed to have lost at the beginning of the 21st century.[179]

Princess Diana

Diana, Princess of Wales was married to Charles, Prince of Wales from 1981 to 1996. She died in a car accident in 1997.

During the summer of 1981, the nation's spirits were raised by the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer.[180] The ceremony reached a global TV audience of 750 million people. It restored the royal family to the headlines where they would become a permanent fixture in tabloids and celebrity gossip publications, as well as a major tourist attraction. Diana became what Tony Blair called the "People's Princess," an iconic national figure, rivalling or surpassing the Queen, until her divorce, Her accidental death brought an unprecedented spasm of grief and mourning.[181] Her brother, the 9th Earl Spencer, captured her role:

"Diana was the very essence of compassion, of duty, of style, of beauty. All over the world she was a symbol of selfless humanity. All over the world, a standard bearer for the rights of the truly downtrodden, a very British girl who transcended nationality. Someone with a natural nobility who was classless and who proved in the last year that she needed no royal title to continue to generate her particular brand of magic.[182]

Economic change

Household prosperity

From 1964 up until 1996, income per head doubled, while ownership of various household goods significantly increased. By 1996, two-thirds of households owned cars, 82% had central heating, most people owned a VCR, and one in five houses had a home computer.[183] In 1971, 9% of households had no access to a shower or bathroom, compared with only 1% in 1990; largely due to demolition or modernisation of older properties that lacked such facilities. In 1971, only 35% had central heating, while 78% enjoyed this amenity in 1990. By 1990, 93% of households had colour television, 87% had telephones, 86% had washing machines, 80% had deep-freezers, 60% had video-recorders and 47% had microwave ovens. Holiday entitlements became more generous. In 1990, nine out of ten full-time manual workers were entitled to more than four weeks of paid holiday a year, while twenty years previously only two-thirds had been allowed three weeks or more.[82] The post-war period also witnessed significant improvements in housing conditions. In 1960, 14% of British households had no inside toilet, while in 1967 22% of all homes had no basic hot water supply. By the Nineties, however almost all homes had these amenities together with central heating, which had been a luxury just two decades earlier.[184]

Troubles of 1970s and after

Deindustrialization

After 1960 British industries were troubled. The railways were decrepit, more textile mills closed than opened, steel employment fell sharply and the automobile industry practically disappeared, apart from some luxury models. Deindustrialization meant the closure of many operations in mining, heavy industry and manufacturing, with the resulting loss of high paid working-class jobs.[185] A certain amount of turnover had always taken place, with newer businesses replacing older ones. However, the 1970s were different, with a worldwide energy crisis and a dramatic influx of low-cost manufactured goods from Asia leading to more closures and fewer openings. Major sectors were hit hard between 1966 and 1982, with a 60 per cent decline in textiles, 53 per cent in metal manufacture, 43 per cent in mining, 38 per cent in construction, and 35 per cent in vehicles.[186] Coal mining quickly collapsed and practically disappeared in the 21st century. The consumption of coal—mostly for electricity—plunged from 157 million tonnes in 1970 to 37 million tonnes in 2015, nearly all of it imported. Coal mining jobs fell from a peak of 1,191,000 in 1920 to 695,000 in 1956, 247,000 in 1976, 44,000 in 1993 to 2,000 in 2015.[187] In the 1970s, manufacturing accounted for 25 percent of the economy. Total employment in manufacturing fell from 7.1 million in 1979 to 4.5 million in 1992 and only 2.7 million in 2016, when it accounted for 10% of the economy.[188][189]

In Scotland deindustrialization took place rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s, as most of the traditional industries drastically shrank or completely closed. A new service-oriented economy emerged to replace them.[190][191] Scotland's shipyards in 1954 built 12 percent of the world's tonnage, falling to 1 percent in 1968.[192] North Sea oil created a major new industry after 1970, and some older firms successfully took advantage of the opportunity. John Brown & Company's shipyard at Clydebank transformed itself from a traditional shipbuilding business to a factor in the high technology offshore oil and gas drilling industry.[193]

Popular response varied.[194] Some nostalgically invoked a glorious industrial past or the bygone British Empire to cope with their newfound personal economic insecurity. Others looked to the EU for help. Some turned to exclusionary Englishness as the solution to current grievances.[195] By the 21st century, enough grievances had accumulated to have a political impact. The United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), based in white working-class towns, increased its vote share while warning against the dangers of immigration. The political reverberations came to a head in the shocking and unexpected popular vote in favour of leaving the EU in 2016.[196]

Deregulation

Thatcher's deregulation of the economy ended the post-war consensus about the planned economy. She was elected at a time of crises between the Labour Party and the trade unions, and a strong trend of higher unemployment and deindustrialisation. She also liberalised stock markets and privatized state-owned enterprises. Inflation fell and trade union power was reduced.

The National Union of Mineworkers had long been one of the strongest trade unions. Its strikes had toppled governments in the 1970s. Thatcher drew the line and defeated it in the bitterly fought miners' strike of 1984–1985. The basic problem was that the easy coal had all been mined and what was left was very expensive. The miners, however, were fighting not just for high wages but for a way of life that had to continue had to be subsidised by other workers. The Union split. In the end almost all the mines were shut down. Britain turned to its vast reserves of North Sea gas and oil, which brought in substantial tax and export revenues, to fuel a new economic boom.

After the economic boom of the 1980s, a brief but severe recession occurred between 1990 and 1992 following the economic chaos of Black Wednesday under the government of Conservative John Major, who had succeeded Thatcher in 1990. However the rest of the 1990s saw the beginning of a period of continuous economic growth that lasted over 16 years and was greatly expanded under Blair's New Labour government following his landslide election victory in 1997, with a rejuvenated party abandoning its commitment to policies including nuclear disarmament and nationalisation of key industries, and no reversal of the Thatcher-led union reforms.

Europe

Britain's wish to join the Common Market (as the European Economic Community was known in Britain) was first expressed in July 1961 by the Macmillan government, was negotiated by Edward Heath as Lord Privy Seal, but was vetoed in 1963 by French President Charles de Gaulle. After initially hesitating over the issue, Wilson lodged a second application (in May 1967) to join the European Community, as it was then called. Like the first, though, it was vetoed by de Gaulle.[197]

In 1973, as Conservative Party leader and Prime Minister, Heath negotiated terms for admission and Britain finally joined the Community in 1973. In opposition, the Labour Party was deeply divided, though Wilson remained in favour. In the 1974 General Election, the Labour Party manifesto included a pledge to renegotiate terms for Britain's membership and then hold a referendum on whether to stay in the EC on the new terms. This was a constitutional procedure without precedent in British history. In the subsequent referendum campaign, rather than the normal British tradition of "collective responsibility", under which the government takes a policy position which all cabinet members are required to support publicly, members of the Government (and the Conservative opposition) were free to present their views on either side of the question. A referendum was duly held on 5 June 1975, and the proposition to continue membership was passed with a substantial majority.[198]

The Single European Act (SEA) was the first major revision of the 1957 Treaty of Rome. In 1987, Thatcher's enacted it into UK law.[199]

The Maastricht Treaty transformed the European Community into the European Union. In 1992, the Conservative government under John Major ratified it, against the opposition of his backbench Maastricht Rebels.[199]

Devolution for Scotland and Wales

On 11 September 1997 (on the 700th anniversary of the Scottish victory over the English at the Battle of Stirling Bridge) a referendum was held on devolving substantial power to a Scottish Parliament.[200] Voters overwhelmingly voted to establish the parliament and grant it limited taxation powers. Two weeks later, a referendum on establishing a Welsh Assembly was also approved, by a narrow majority. The first elections were held, and these bodies began to operate, in 1999. The creation of these bodies widened the differences between regions, especially in areas such as healthcare.[201][202]

1997-

Tony Blair and New Labour

File:TonyBlairofficial (cropped).jpg
Tony Blair was Prime Minister from 1997 to 2007.

Tony Blair became the leader of the Labour Party in 1994, and three times was elected Prime Minister (1997–2007). With Gordon Brown he founded the movement known as New Labour. He was known internationally for his responsibility for British participation in the conflicts in Kosovo, Afghanistan and (amid substantial controversy) Iraq.[203] The coalition of the US, UK and other countries initially failed to quell a substantial insurgency that reemerged when coalition forces withdrew in 2011. By 2010 only 12% of Britons considered the Iraq war to have been a success.[204]

Blair sought to modernise Britain's public services, encourage enterprise and innovation in its private sector and keep its economy open to international commerce. The North Irish, Scottish and Welsh devolutions took place under his administration.[205]

Kavanagh argues that by the 1980s, left-wing or socialist tendencies in the Labour Party divided the party and united its enemies:

Labour voters are not attracted by many "socialist" policies, that is greater public ownership, comprehensive education, extending trade union rights, and redistribution. Such policies appear to unite supporters of other parties in rejection well serving to divide Labour voters.[206]

Blair moved the Labour Party in new directions, minimising the left-wing/socialist factions. He thereby broadened the appeal to middle-class and professional voters.

Blair was also anxious to escape from the Labour party's reputation for "tax-and-spend" domestic policies; he wanted instead to establish a reputation for fiscal prudence. He had undertaken in general terms to modernise the welfare state, but he had avoided undertaking to reduce poverty, achieve full employment, or reverse the increase in inequality that had occurred during the Thatcher administration. Once in office, however, his government launched a package of social policies designed to reduce unemployment and poverty. The commitment to modernise the welfare state was tackled by the introduction of "welfare to work" programmes[207][208] to motivate the unemployed to return to work instead of drawing benefit. Poverty reduction programmes were targeted at specific groups, including children and the elderly, and took the form of what were termed "New Deals".[209] There were also new tax credits for low-income and single-parent families with children, and "Sure Start" progammes for under-fours in deprived areas. A "National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal"[210] was launched in 2001 with the objective of ensuring that "within 10 to 20 years no-one should be seriously disadvantaged by where they live"; a "Social Exclusion Unit"[211] was set up, and annual progress reports concerning the reduction of poverty and social exclusion were commissioned.[212][213]

Brown as Prime Minister

Chancellor Gordon Brown replaced Blair as Prime Minister in 2007. After initial rises in opinion polls, Labour's popularity declined with the onset of a worldwide recession in 2008, leading to poor results in local European elections in 2009. A year later, Labour lost 91 seats in the House of Commons at the 2010 general election, the party's biggest loss of seats in a single general election since 1931.[214] Brown was succeeded as Prime Minister by David Cameron, and as Leader of the Labour Party by Ed Miliband.

Conservatives return

The economic damage done by the Great Recession weakened Labour and facilitated a Conservative come-back. Cameron (2010-2016) sought to rebrand the Conservatives, embracing an increasingly socially liberal position. The 2010 general election made Cameron Prime Minister heading a coalition government with the much smaller Liberal Democrats. His premiership was marked by the ongoing negative economic effects of the late-2000s worldwide financial crisis. He faced a large deficit in government finances that he sought to reduce through austerity measures. His administration introduced large-scale changes to welfare, immigration policy, education and healthcare.[215] His government privatised the Royal Mail and some other state assets, and legalised same-sex marriage. He won an easy reelection in 2015 with 330 seats in Commons against 296.

Cameron resigned as Prime Minister the following year after the British public voted to leave the European Union in a national referendum, after campaigning for the opposing 'remain' side. He was succeeded by former Home Secretary Theresa May, who called another general election for the summer of 2017, in which the Conservatives lots seats.

Housing

United Kingdom housing affordability as described by mortgage payments as a percentage of take home pay from 1983 to 2015

House prices tripled in the 20 years between 1995 and 2015. Growth was almost continuous during the period, save for a two-year period of decline around 2008 as a result of the banking crisis.[216] The gap between income and house prices has increased in the period such that even in the most affordable regions of England and Wales, buyers have to spend six times their income. It was most marked in London, where in 2013 the £300,000, median house price costs 12 times the median London income of £24,600.[217]

Brexit

Economic and social issues caused political unrest, particularly in areas hurt by deindustrialization and globalization. The UK Independence Party (UKIP), a Eurosceptic political party, formed in 1993. It rose to prominence after 2000, winning third place in the 2004 European elections, second place in the 2009 European elections and first place in the 2014 European elections, with 27.5% of the total vote.[218] Cameron won reelection in 2015 in part by promising a referendum on the EU, which he expected would easily defeat Brexit.

Unexpectedly the 'Leave' pro-Brexit campaign thrived

on issues relating to sovereignty and migration,[219] whereas the remain campaign focused on the economic impacts of leaving the EU. Polls showed more cited both the EU (32%) and migration (48%) as important issues than cited the economy (27%).[220]

Historiography

Post-war consensus

The post-war consensus is a historians' model of political agreement spanning 1945 to 1979, when newly elected Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher rejected and reversed it.[221] The concept claims a widespread consensus that covered support for a coherent package of policies that were developed in the 1930s, promised during the Second World War, and enacted under Attlee. The policies dealt with a mixed economy, Keynesianism and a broad welfare state.[222] In recent years the validity of the interpretation has been debated by historians.

This model was most fully developed by Paul Addison.[223] The basic argument is that in the 1930s Liberal Party intellectuals led by John Maynard Keynes and William Beveridge developed a series of plans that became especially attractive as the wartime government promised a much better post-war Britain and saw the need to engage every sector of society. The wartime government, headed by Churchill and Attlee, signed off on a series of white papers that promised Britain a much improved welfare state after the war. The promises included the national health service, expansion of education, housing, and various welfare programmes. It did not include the nationalisation of all industries, which was a Labour Party design. The Labour Party did not challenge the system of elite public schools—they became part of the consensus, as did comprehensive schools. Nor did Labour challenge the primacy of Oxford and Cambridge universities. However, the consensus did call for building many new universities to dramatically broaden society's educational base. Conservatives did not challenge the socialised medicine of the National Health Service; instead, they claimed they could run it better.[224] In foreign policy, the consensus called for an anti-Communist Cold War policy, decolonisation, close ties to NATO, the United States, and the Commonwealth, and slowly emerging ties to the European Community.[225]

The model states that from 1945 until the arrival of Thatcher in 1979, a broad multi-partisan national consensus on social and economic policy held, especially regarding the welfare state, nationalised health services, educational reform, a mixed economy, government regulation, Keynesian macroeconomic policies and full employment. Apart from the question of nationalisation, these policies were broadly accepted by the three major parties, as well as by industry, the financial community and the labour movement. Until the 1980s, historians generally agreed on the existence and importance of the consensus.

Historians such as Ralph Miliband expressed disappointment that the consensus was a modest or even conservative package that blocked a fully socialised society.[226] Angus Calder complained bitterly that the post-war reforms were an inadequate reward for the wartime sacrifices and a cynical betrayal of the people's hope for a more just post-war society.[227] In recent years, a historiographical debate raged on whether such a consensus ever existed.[228]

See also

References

  1. ^ Oaten, Mark (2007). Coalition: The Politics and Personalities of Coalition Government from 1850. Petersfield: Harriman House. p. 157. ISBN 978-1905641284 – via Web. N/A
  2. ^ "BBC - History - World Wars: Why Churchill Lost in 1945". Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  3. ^ Kynaston 2010, p. 75.
  4. ^ "BBC Bitesize - National 5 History - Social Impact of WWII in Britain - Revision 2". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  5. ^ Morgan 1985, Chapter 1.
  6. ^ Pelling, Henry (1980). "The 1945 general election reconsidered". Historical Journal. 23 (2): 399–414.
  7. ^ "Designing Britain learning module". vads.ac.uk. Brighton University Of. 8 August 2002. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  8. ^ "BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | What's a little debt between friends?". news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  9. ^ "How successful was labours' nationalisation programme 1945 - 1951? - A-Level History - Marked by Teachers.com". www.markedbyteachers.com. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  10. ^ Kynaston 2010.
  11. ^ "BBC - History - British History in depth: Britain, the Commonwealth and the End of Empire". Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  12. ^ Vinen, Richard (28 August 2014). "National Service: Conscription in Britain, 1945-1963". Times Higher Education (THE). Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  13. ^ Grant, Philip A. (1995). "President Harry S. Truman and the British Loan Act of 1946". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 25 (3): 489–496. doi:10.2307/27551463.
  14. ^ Das, Dilip (2004). The Economic Dimensions of Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 70. ISBN 978-1349514335 – via web. N/A
  15. ^ Magid, Jacob (2012). "The Marshall Plan" (PDF). Advances in Historical Studies. 1: 1–7 – via SciRes.
  16. ^ Morgan 1985, pp. 269–77.
  17. ^ "Rationing in the Second World War". Pinterest. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  18. ^ "Post World War Two 'National Service' in Britain: 1949-1963". www.1900s.org.uk. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  19. ^ "Rationing". The 1940's Experiment. 6 September 2009. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  20. ^ Robertson, Alex J. (July 1989). The Bleak Midwinter, 1947. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-2347-7.
  21. ^ Hughes, R. Gerald (2007). Britain, Germany and the Cold War: The Search for a European Détente 1949–1967. Taylor & Francis. p. 11.
  22. ^ Farmer, Richard (1 December 2011). "'A Temporarily Vanished Civilisation': Ice Cream, Confectionery and Wartime Cinema-Going". Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 31 (4): 479–497. doi:10.1080/01439685.2011.620840. ISSN 0143-9685.
  23. ^ Hinton, James (1994). "Militant Housewives: The British Housewives' League and the Attlee Government". History Workshop (38): 128–156.
  24. ^ Zweiniger-Bargileowska, Ina (1994). "Rationing, austerity and the Conservative party recovery after 1945". Historical Journal. 37 (1): 173–97.
  25. ^ Kynaston 2010, pp. 445-453.
  26. ^ "London 1948 Summer Olympics - results & video highlights". International Olympic Committee. 31 January 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  27. ^ Sefryn Penrose, "London 1948: the sites and after-lives of the austerity Olympics," World Archaeology (2012) 44#2 pp 306–325.
  28. ^ Reeves, Rachel; McIvor, Martin (2014). "Clement Attlee and the foundations of the British welfare state". Renewal: a Journal of Labour Politics. 22 (3/4): 42+.
  29. ^ Barr, N. A. (1993). The Economics of the Welfare State. Stanford UP. p. 33.
  30. ^ Choices, NHS. "The NHS history (1948-1959) - NHS England - NHS Choices". www.nhs.uk. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  31. ^ Tomlinson, Jim (20 June 2002). Democratic Socialism and Economic Policy: The Attlee Years, 1945-1951. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89259-9.
  32. ^ Thompson, Noel (2006). Political Economy and the Labour Party: The Economics of Democratic Socialism, 1884-2005. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. NB. ISBN 978-0415328814.
  33. ^ a b "BBC NEWS | UK | UK settles WWII debts to allies". news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  34. ^ "BBC - Standard Grade Bitesize History - Urban housing : Revision, Page 3". Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  35. ^ Roberts, Clayton; Roberts, David F.; Bisson, Douglas (2013). A History of England, Volume 2: 1668 to the Present. Routledge. ISBN 978-0205867738.
  36. ^ "History of UK Housing | Economics Help". www.economicshelp.org. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  37. ^ Castella, Tom de (13 January 2015). "Why can't the UK build 240,000 houses a year?". BBC News. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  38. ^ "The History of Council Housing". fet.uwe.ac.uk. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  39. ^ "When Britain demanded fair shares for all". The Independent. 27 July 1995. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  40. ^ Wilson, Wendy. "The historical context of rent control in the private rented sector". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  41. ^ Levine, B.N. (1983). "British New Town Planning: A Wave of the Future or a Ripple across the Atlantic". Journal of Legislation. 10: 246–264 – via NDL Scholarship.
  42. ^ Burnett 1986.
  43. ^ Francis, Martin (1 January 1995). "Economics and EthicsThe Nature of Labour's Socialism, 1945–1951". Twentieth Century British History. 6 (2): 220–243. doi:10.1093/tcbh/6.2.220. ISSN 0955-2359.
  44. ^ "Proud of the NHS at 60". Labour Party. Retrieved 15 March 2010.
  45. ^ Sked & Cook 1979, p. 29.
  46. ^ Sked & Cook 1979, Chapters 2-4.
  47. ^ Jack C. Ellis; Betsy A. McLane (2005). A New History of Documentary Film. A&C Black. p. 203.
  48. ^ Sked & Cook 1979, pp. 31–34.
  49. ^ Hutchison Beer, Samuel (1966). British politics in the collectivist age. Knopf. pp. 188–216.
  50. ^ Medlicott, William Norton (1967). Contemporary England: 1914-1964. D. McKay Company.
  51. ^ Kynaston 2010, p. 284.
  52. ^ Foot, Michael (6 October 2011). Aneurin Bevan: A Biography: Volume 2: 1945-1960. Faber & Faber. pp. 280–346. ISBN 978-0-571-28085-8.
  53. ^ Hogan, Michael J. (1987). The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952. Cambridge UP. pp. 143–45.
  54. ^ Pugh, Martin (26 January 2017). State and Society: A Social and Political History of Britain since 1870. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. Chapter 16. ISBN 978-1-4742-4347-6.
  55. ^ Kynaston 2010, Chapter 4.
  56. ^ Williamson, James (2008). "British Socialism and the Marshall Plan | History Today". www.historytoday.com. pp. 53–59. Retrieved 6 September 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  57. ^ Baylis, John (1 June 1982). "Britain and the Dunkirk Treaty: The origins of NATO". Journal of Strategic Studies. 5 (2): 236–247. doi:10.1080/01402398208437111. ISSN 0140-2390.
  58. ^ Baylis, John (1984). "Britain, the Brussels Pact and the Continental Commitment". International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 60 (4): 615–629. doi:10.2307/2620045.
  59. ^ Brendon, Piers (28 October 2008). The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1781-1997. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. Chapter 13–16. ISBN 978-0-307-27028-3.
  60. ^ Karp, Regina Cowen, ed. (1991). Security With Nuclear Weapons: Different Perspectives on National Security. Oxford U.P. pp. 145–47.
  61. ^ Zweiniger-Bargielowska, Ina (1994). "Rationing, Austerity and the Conservative Party Recovery after 1945". The Historical Journal. 37 (1): 173–197. doi:10.2307/2640057.
  62. ^ Morgan 1992, p. 110.
  63. ^ Toye, Richard (15 January 2013). "From 'Consensus' to 'Common Ground': The Rhetoric of the Postwar Settlement and its Collapse". Journal of Contemporary History. 48 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/0022009412461816.
  64. ^ Morgan 1992, p. 114.
  65. ^ "1957: Britons 'have never had it so good'". BBC. 20 July 1957. Retrieved 12 March 2009.
  66. ^ Sloman, John; Garratt, Dean; Alison Wride (6 January 2015). Economics. Pearson Education Limited. p. 811. ISBN 978-1-292-06484-0.
  67. ^ Easton, Mark (2 May 2006). "Britain's happiness in decline". BBC. Retrieved 12 March 2009.
  68. ^ Healey, Nigel, ed. (26 September 2002). Britain's Economic Miracle: Myth Or Reality?. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-89226-6.
  69. ^ Black, Lawrence; Pemberton, Hugh (28 July 2017). An Affluent Society?: Britain's Post-War 'Golden Age' Revisited. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-351-95917-9.
  70. ^ Kynaston 2009.
  71. ^ Gurney, Peter (2005). "The Battle of the Consumer in Postwar Britain". Journal of Modern History. 77 (4): 956–987.
  72. ^ Van Vliet, Willem (1987). Housing Markets and Policies Under Fiscal Austerity. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-25409-3.
  73. ^ Addison & Jones 2008.
  74. ^ Hollow, Matthew (2011). 'The Age of Affluence': Council Estates and Consumer Society.
  75. ^ Sandbrook, Dominic (5 February 2015). Never Had It So Good: A History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles. Little, Brown Book Group. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-349-14127-5.
  76. ^ Hill, Charles Peter (1985). British Economic and Social History, 1700-1982. E. Arnold. ISBN 978-0-7131-7382-6.
  77. ^ Unstead, R. J. (1967). A Century of Change, 1837-today. Betterway. p. 224.
  78. ^ Pugh, Martin (2011). Speak for Britain!: A New History of the Labour Party. Vintage Books. pp. 315–. ISBN 978-0-09-952078-8.
  79. ^ Burnett 1986, p. 302.
  80. ^ Lapping, Brian (1970). The Labour Government, 1964-70. Penguin Books.
  81. ^ MacDowall, David (2000). Britain in Close-up: An In-depth Study of Contemporary Britain. Longman.
  82. ^ a b Anthony Sampson, The Essential Anatomy of Britain: Democracy in Crisis (1993) p 64
  83. ^ Harrison 2011, p. 305.
  84. ^ Harrison 2011, p. 305-6.
  85. ^ Turner, Alwyn W. (19 March 2009). Crisis? What Crisis?: Britain in the 1970s. Aurum Press. ISBN 978-1-84513-851-6.
  86. ^ Beckett, Andy (7 May 2009). When the Lights Went Out: Britain in the Seventies. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-25226-8.
  87. ^ Sked` 1979, p. 324.
  88. ^ Bending, Richard; Eden, Richard (1984). UK Energy: Structure, Prospects and Policies. CUP Archive. ISBN 978-0-521-26708-3.
  89. ^ Hennessy, Peter (2007). Having it So Good: Britain in the Fifties. Penguin. p. 45.
  90. ^ Mulholland, M. (7 April 2000). Northern Ireland at the Crossroads: Ulster Unionism in the O'Neill Years, 1960-69. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-0-333-97786-6.
  91. ^ Dixon, Paul (26 September 2008). Northern Ireland: The Politics of War and Peace. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-05424-1.
  92. ^ Farrington, C. (28 February 2006). Ulster Unionism and the Peace Process in Northern Ireland. Springer. ISBN 978-0-230-80072-4.
  93. ^ Nelson, Elizabeth (25 September 1989). British Counter-Culture 1966-73: A Study Of The Underground Press. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-1-349-20217-1.
  94. ^ Addison & Jones 2008, p. 132.
  95. ^ Stark, Steven D. (13 October 2009). Meet the Beatles: A Cultural History of the Band That Shook Youth, Gender, and the World. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-184252-8.
  96. ^ Faulk, Barry J. (23 May 2016). British Rock Modernism, 1967-1977: The Story of Music Hall in Rock. Routledge. pp. 5–. ISBN 978-1-317-17152-2.
  97. ^ Ellis, Sylvia A. (4 July 2014). "Promoting solidarity at home and abroad: the goals and tactics of the anti-Vietnam War movement in Britain". European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire. 21 (4): 557–576. doi:10.1080/13507486.2014.933186. ISSN 1350-7486.
  98. ^ Forster, Peter G. (5 August 2011). "Secularization in the English Context: Some Conceptual and Empirical Problems". The Sociological Review. 20 (2): 153–168. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1972.tb00206.x.
  99. ^ Hennessy 2006.
  100. ^ Morgan 1985, p. 299.
  101. ^ Harrison 2009, pp. 371–72.
  102. ^ Trzebiatowska, Marta (23 December 2010). "The Advent of the 'EasyJet Priest': Dilemmas of Polish Catholic Integration in the UK". Sociology. 44 (6): 1055–1072. doi:10.1177/0038038510381618.
  103. ^ Harrison 2011, p. 339-48.
  104. ^ Harrison 2009, pp. 373–81.
  105. ^ Cook & Stevenson 1996, p. 143.
  106. ^ Gilliat-Ray, Sophie (2010). Muslims in Britain. p. 117.}}
  107. ^ "Hindu, Muslim and Sikh populations".
  108. ^ "How Many Muslims? British Religion in Numbers". Brin.ac.uk. 21 September 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  109. ^ Pugh 1990, p. 131.
  110. ^ Lewis, Jane (1984). Women in England 1870-1950: Sexual Divisions and Social Change. Wheatsheaf Books. ISBN 978-0-7108-0186-9.
  111. ^ Bruley 1999, p. 131.
  112. ^ Whiteman, Phyllis (1953). Speaking as a woman. Chapman & Hall. p. 67.
  113. ^ Pugh 1990, p. 158.
  114. ^ Bruley 1999, p. 118.
  115. ^ Pugh, Martin (2000). Women and the Women's Movement in Britain, 1914-1999. St. Martin's Press. p. 284. ISBN 978-0-312-23491-1.
  116. ^ Caine, Barbara (10 July 1997). English Feminism, 1780-1980. OUP Oxford. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-19-158475-6.
  117. ^ Finch & Summerfield 1991, p. 11.
  118. ^ Harrison 2009, p. 233.
  119. ^ Conley, Hazel (10 April 2013). "Trade unions, equal pay and the law in the UK". Economic and Industrial Democracy. 35 (2): 309–323. doi:10.1177/0143831x13480410.
  120. ^ August, Andrew (1 March 2009). "Gender and 1960s Youth Culture: The Rolling Stones and the New Woman". Contemporary British History. 23 (1): 79–100. doi:10.1080/13619460801990104. ISSN 1361-9462.
  121. ^ Mort, Frank (2010). Capital Affairs: London and the Making of the Permissive Society. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11879-7. online review.
  122. ^ Geiringer, David (1 June 2017). "Catholic Understandings of Female Sexuality in 1960s Britain". Twentieth Century British History. 28 (2): 209–238. doi:10.1093/tcbh/hww051. ISSN 0955-2359.
  123. ^ Addison, Paul (24 June 2010). No Turning Back: The Peacetime Revolutions of Post-War Britain. OUP Oxford. pp. 218–19, 342–43. ISBN 978-0-19-102984-4.
  124. ^ Campbell, John (30 April 2011). Margaret Thatcher Volume Two: The Iron Lady. Random House. pp. 473–74. ISBN 978-1-4464-2008-9.
  125. ^ Bassnett, Susan (2012). Feminist Experiences: The Women's Movement in Four Cultures. Routledge. p. 136.
  126. ^ Fry, G. (2001). The Politics of Crisis: An Interpretation of British Politics, 1931–1945. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 187–89.
  127. ^ Howard, Anthony (7 February 2013). RAB: The Life of R.A. Butler. A&C Black. pp. 118–22. ISBN 978-1-4482-1082-4.
  128. ^ Addison, Paul (31 May 2011). The Road To 1945: British Politics and the Second World War Revised Edition. Random House. pp. 237–38. ISBN 978-1-4464-2421-6.
  129. ^ Jeffereys, Kevin (1 January 1984). "R. a. Butler, the Board of Education and the 1944 Education Act". History. 69 (227): 415–431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229x.1984.tb01429.x. ISSN 1468-229X.
  130. ^ Simon, Brian (1 March 1986). "The 1944 Education Act: A Conservative measure?". History of Education. 15 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1080/0046760860150104. ISSN 0046-760X.
  131. ^ Dean, Dennis (1 January 1998). "Circular 10/65 Revisited: The Labour Government and the "Comprehensive Revolution" in 1964‐1965". Paedagogica Historica. 34 (1): 63–91. doi:10.1080/0030923980340103. ISSN 0030-9230.
  132. ^ Reitan, Earl Aaron (2003). The Thatcher Revolution: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair, and the Transformation of Modern Britain, 1979-2001. p. 14.
  133. ^ Harrison 2011, p. 357-64.
  134. ^ Boliver, Vikki (1 June 2013). "How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities?". The British Journal of Sociology. 64 (2): 344–364. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12021. ISSN 1468-4446.
  135. ^ Gewirtz, Sharon; Cribb, Alan (1 February 2013). "Representing 30 years of higher education change: UK universities and the Times Higher". Journal of Educational Administration and History. 45 (1): 58–83. doi:10.1080/00220620.2013.730505. ISSN 0022-0620.
  136. ^ Potter, Simon J. (5 July 2012). "5-7". Broadcasting Empire: The BBC and the British World, 1922-1970. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-956896-3.
  137. ^ Garnham, Nicholas (1 January 1994). "The Broadcasting Market and the Future of the Bbc". The Political Quarterly. 65 (1): 11–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923x.1994.tb00386.x. ISSN 1467-923X.
  138. ^ Koss, Stephen E. (1981). The Rise and Fall of the Political Press in Britain: The twentieth century. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1598-4.
  139. ^ With the exception of Greyhound racing Harrison 2011, p. 386
  140. ^ Beck, Peter J. (1 April 2008). "The British Government and the Olympic movement: The 1948 London Olympics". The International Journal of the History of Sport. 25 (5): 615–647. doi:10.1080/09523360701875566. ISSN 0952-3367.
  141. ^ Hampton, Janie (1 January 2012). The Austerity Olympics: When the Games Came to London in 1948. Aurum Press. ISBN 978-1-78131-001-4.
  142. ^ Hennessy 2006, pp. 306, 316.
  143. ^ Davies, Hunter (22 April 2011). The Glory Game. Mainstream Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78057-011-2.
  144. ^ Taylor, Matthew (18 October 2013). The Association Game: A History of British Football. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-87008-1.
  145. ^ Harrison 2011, p. 386.
  146. ^ Stewart, Graham (1 January 2013). Bang!: A History of Britain in the 1980s. Atlantic Books. pp. 320–23. ISBN 978-1-78239-137-1.
  147. ^ Stott, Clifford (1 September 2010). Football 'Hooliganism'. Pennant Books Limited. ISBN 978-1-906015-67-1.
  148. ^ Stead, David; Maguire, Joseph (24 July 2016). "Cricket's Global 'Finishing School': The Migration of Overseas Cricketers into English County Cricket". European Physical Education Review. 4 (1): 54–69. doi:10.1177/1356336x9800400106.
  149. ^ Kay, Joyce (1 December 2012). "Grass Roots: The Development of Tennis in Britain, 1918–1978". The International Journal of the History of Sport. 29 (18): 2532–2550. doi:10.1080/09523367.2012.746808. ISSN 0952-3367.
  150. ^ Kay, Joyce (1 June 2010). "A Window of Opportunity? Preliminary Thoughts on Women's Sport in Post-war Britain". Sport in History. 30 (2): 196–217. doi:10.1080/17460263.2010.481206. ISSN 1746-0263.
  151. ^ Addison & Jones 2008, p. 113.
  152. ^ Curran, James; Porter, Vincent (1983). British cinema history. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  153. ^ Babington, Bruce (2001). British Stars and Stardom: From Alma Taylor to Sean Connery. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-5841-7.
  154. ^ "Harry Potter becomes highest-grossing film franchise". The Guardian. London. 11 September 2007. Retrieved 2 November 2010.
  155. ^ "Scott, Sir Ridley (1937-)". British Film Institute. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  156. ^ "Chaplin, Charles (1889–1977)". British Film Institute. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  157. ^ "UK film - the vital statistics". UK Film Council. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  158. ^ "UK cinema box office". Cinema Exhibitor's Association. Retrieved 18 March 2013.
  159. ^ "UK cinema annual admissions". Cinema Exhibitor's Association. Retrieved 18 March 2013.
  160. ^ Hansen, Randall (2000). Citizenship and Immigration in Postwar Britain. Oxford University Press.
  161. ^ Royle, Edward (1997). Modern Britain: A Social History, 1750-1997. Arnold. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-340-57944-2.
  162. ^ Phillimore, Jenny; Goodson, Lisa (2 July 2016). "Problem or Opportunity? Asylum Seekers, Refugees, Employment and Social Exclusion in Deprived Urban Areas". Urban Studies. 43 (10): 1715–1736. doi:10.1080/00420980600838606.
  163. ^ Hynes, Patricia (2011). The Dispersal and Social Exclusion of Asylum Seekers: Between Liminality and Belonging. Policy Press. ISBN 978-1-84742-326-9.
  164. ^ Ewart, Henrietta (1 September 2011). "'Coventry Irish': Community, Class, Culture and Narrative in the Formation of a Migrant Identity, 1940–1970". Midland History. 36 (2): 225–244. doi:10.1179/004772911x13074595849112. ISSN 0047-729X.
  165. ^ Charsley, Katharine; Storer-Church, Brooke; Benson, Michaela; Van Hear, Nicholas (1 December 2012). "Marriage-Related Migration to the UK". International Migration Review. 46 (4): 861–890. doi:10.1111/imre.12003. ISSN 1747-7379.
  166. ^ Dale, Angela; Ahmed, Sameera (1 June 2011). "Marriage and employment patterns amongst UK-raised Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi women". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 34 (6): 902–924. doi:10.1080/01419870.2011.564058. ISSN 0141-9870.
  167. ^ Coleman, D. A.; Dubuc, S. (1 March 2010). "The fertility of ethnic minorities in the UK, 1960s–2006". Population Studies. 64 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/00324720903391201. ISSN 0032-4728. PMID 20087815.
  168. ^ Whipple, Amy (2009). "Revisiting the "Rivers of Blood" Controversy: Letters to Enoch Powell". Journal of British Studies. 48 (3): 717–735. doi:10.2307/27752577.
  169. ^ Moore, Charles (21 May 2013). Margaret Thatcher: From Grantham to the Falklands. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-95895-2.
  170. ^ Kavanagh, Dennis (1997). The Reordering of British Politics: Politics After Thatcher. Oxford U.P. p. 111.
  171. ^ Butler, David; Kavanagh, Dennis (15 December 1997). The British General Election of 1997. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-1-349-26040-9.
  172. ^ Campbell, John (5 January 2012). The Iron Lady: Margaret Thatcher: From Grocer’s Daughter to Iron Lady. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4481-3067-2.
  173. ^ Stevens, Richard (1 June 2004). "The Evolution of Privatisation as an Electoral Policy, c.1970–90". Contemporary British History. 18 (2): 47–75. doi:10.1080/1361946042000227733. ISSN 1361-9462.
  174. ^ Norris, Pippa (1 January 1990). "Thatcher's enterprise society and electoral change". West European Politics. 13 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1080/01402389008424780. ISSN 0140-2382.
  175. ^ Renwick, Robin (2 April 2013). A Journey with Margaret Thatcher: Foreign Policy Under the Iron Lady. Biteback Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84954-575-4.
  176. ^ Lahey, Daniel James (1 February 2013). "The Thatcher government's response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, 1979–1980". Cold War History. 13 (1): 21–42. doi:10.1080/14682745.2012.721355. ISSN 1468-2745.
  177. ^ Aldous, Richard (27 March 2012). Reagan and Thatcher: The Difficult Relationship. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4464-9388-5.
  178. ^ Dauvergne, Peter (2009). The A to Z of Environmentalism. Scarecrow Press. pp. 83–84.
  179. ^ Davis, Christie (2006). The strange death of moral Britain. Transaction Publishers. p. 265.
  180. ^ Davies, J. (11 June 2001). Diana, A Cultural History: Gender, Race, Nation and the People’s Princess. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-0-230-59825-6.
  181. ^ Weight 2013, pp. 659, 681.
  182. ^ Spencer, Earl. "A brother remembers his sister: Full text of Earl Spencer's Funeral Oratio".
  183. ^ Radice, Giles (1996). What Needs to Change: New Visions for Britain. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-255693-4.
  184. ^ "Homes less affordable than 50 years ago - but at least more of them have indoor toilets!".
  185. ^ High, Steven (November 2013). ""The wounds of class": a historiographical reflection on the study of deindustrialization, 1973–2013". History Compass. 11 (11). Wiley: 994–1007. doi:10.1111/hic3.12099. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  186. ^ Harrison 2009, p. 295.
  187. ^ "Historical coal data: coal production, availability and consumption 1853 to 20152". Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2016.
  188. ^ Cook & Stevenson 2014, pp. 167–68.
  189. ^ "UK manufacturers provide a strong foundation for growth in the UK" EEF (2017)
  190. ^ Payne, Peter L. (1 May 1995). "THE END OF STEELMAKING IN SCOTLAND, c.1967-1993". Scottish Economic & Social History. 15 (1): 66–84. doi:10.3366/sesh.1995.15.15.66. ISSN 0269-5030.
  191. ^ Finlay, Richard (January 2004). "Decay: 1975-1987". In Finlay, Richard J. (ed.). Modern Scotland: 1914-2000. Profile. ISBN 978-1-86197-299-6.
  192. ^ Weight 2013, p. 403.
  193. ^ McKinstry, Sam (1 May 1998). "Transforming John Brown's Shipyard: The Drilling Rig and Offshore Fabrication Businesses of Marathon and UIE, 1972-1997". Scottish Economic & Social History. 18 (1): 33–60. doi:10.3366/sesh.1998.18.1.33. ISSN 0269-5030.
  194. ^ Thorleifsson, Cathrine (2016). "From coal to Ukip: the struggle over identity in post-industrial Doncaster". History and Anthropology, special issue: Overheating: Towards an anthropological history of the early 21st century. 27 (5). Taylor and Francis: 555–568. doi:10.1080/02757206.2016.1219354. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  195. ^ Strangleman, Tim; Rhodes, James; Linkon, Sherry (Fall 2013). "From coal to Ukip: the struggle over identity in post-industrial Doncaster". International Labor and Working-Class History. 84 (1). Cambridge Journals: 7–22. doi:10.1017/S0147547913000227. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link) Pdf.
  196. ^ O'Reilly, Jacqueline; et al. (October 2016). "Brexit: understanding the socio-economic origins and consequences (discussion forum)". Socio-Economic Review, special issue: What is patient capital, and where does it exist?. 14 (4). Oxford Journals: 807–854. doi:10.1093/ser/mww043. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last2= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  197. ^ Thorpe, Andrew (29 April 2015). A History of the British Labour Party. Macmillan Education UK. ISBN 978-1-137-40982-9.
  198. ^ "1975: UK embraces Europe in referendum". BBC On This Day.
  199. ^ a b "BBC News - Ever closer union? The UK and Europe". news.bbc.co.uk.
  200. ^ Walker, Graham (2010). "Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Devolution, 1945-1979". Journal of British Studies. 49 (1): 117–142. doi:10.2307/27752693.
  201. ^ See 'Huge contrasts' in devolved NHS BBC News, 28 August 2008
  202. ^ NHS now four different systems BBC 2 January 2008
  203. ^ Langley, Andrew (2014). Blair, Bush, and Iraq. Raintree. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-1-4062-6154-7.
  204. ^ "All things considered, do you think the Iraq War was a success or a failure?" (PDF). Vision Critical. 20 August 2010.
  205. ^ Seldon, Anthony (20 September 2007). Blair's Britain, 1997–2007. Cambridge University Press. pp. ch 1, 8. ISBN 978-1-139-46898-5.
  206. ^ Kavanagh, Dennis (1990). Thatcherism and British Politics: The End of Consensus?. Oxford University Press. p. 312. ISBN 978-0-19-827756-9.
  207. ^ Evans, Martin (2001). "Welfare to work and the organisation of opportunity" (PDF). ESRC Research Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
  208. ^ Finn, Dan (28 March 2000). "Modernisation or Workfare? New Labour's Work-Based Welfare State ESRC Labour Studies Seminar".
  209. ^ Beaudry, Richard (2002). "Workfare and Welfare: Britain's New Deal, Working Paper Series # 2" (PDF). The Canadian Centre for German and European Studies.
  210. ^ "Evaluation of the National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal – Final report" (PDF). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. 2010.
  211. ^ "The Social Exclusion Unit" (PDF). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
  212. ^ "Opportunity for All: Tackling Poverty and Social Exclusion". Department for Social Security. 1999. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  213. ^ "Opportunity for All, 7th annual report" (PDF). Department of Work and Pensions. 2005.
  214. ^ Maddox, David (7 May 2010). "General Election 2010: Gordon's career is finished – Labour MP". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 3 December 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  215. ^ Morris, Nigel (22 May 2014). "David Cameron sticks to his guns on immigration reduction pledge even while numbers rise". The Independent. London. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  216. ^ "Land Registry - search the house price index". Landregistry.data.gov.uk. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  217. ^ "The widening gulf between salaries and house prices". Theguardian.com. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  218. ^ "10 key lessons from the European election results". The Guardian. 26 May 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  219. ^ "EU referendum: Vote Leave focuses on immigration". BBC News. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  220. ^ "Ipsos MORI | Poll | Concern about immigration rises as EU vote approaches". www.ipsos-mori.com. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  221. ^ Toye, Richard (15 January 2013). "From 'Consensus' to 'Common Ground': The Rhetoric of the Postwar Settlement and its Collapse". Journal of Contemporary History. 48 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/0022009412461816.
  222. ^ Dennis Kavanagh, "The Postwar Consensus," Twentieth Century British History (1992) 3#2 pp 175-190.
  223. ^ Addison, Paul (31 May 2011). The Road To 1945: British Politics and the Second World War Revised Edition. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4464-2421-6.
  224. ^ Klein, Rudolf (1985). "Why Britain's conservatives support a socialist health care system" (PDF). Health Affairs. 4 (1): 41–58.
  225. ^ Gordon, Michael R. (1969). Conflict and Consensus in Labour's Foreign Policy, 1914-1965. Stanford University Press. pp. 2–. ISBN 978-0-8047-0686-5.
  226. ^ Miliband, Ralph (1972). Parliamentary socialism: a study in the politics of labour. Merlin Press.
  227. ^ Calder, Angus (31 July 2012). The People's War: Britain 1939-1945. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4481-0310-2.
  228. ^ Ritschel, Daniel (January 2003). "Consensus in the Postwar Period After 1945". In Loades, D. M. (ed.). Reader's Guide to British History. Vol. 1. Taylor & Francis. pp. 296–297. ISBN 978-1-57958-242-5.

Further reading

Popular social history

  • Beckett, Andy. When the Lights Went Out: Britain in the Seventies (2009) excerpt and text search.
  • Booker, Christopher. The Seventies: The Decade That Changed the Future (1980)
  • Donnelly, Mark. Sixties Britain: Culture, Society and Politics (2005) 264pp; by an academic
  • Garnett, Mark. From Anger to Apathy: The Story of Politics, Society and Popular Culture in Britain since 1975 (2008) excerpt
  • Hennessy, Peter (5 October 2006). Never Again: Britain 1945-1951. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN 978-0-14-192932-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
    • Hennessy, Peter. Having it so good: Britain in the fifties (2007), a major scholarly survey; 760pp
  • Hopkins, Harry. The new look: a social history of the forties and fifties in Britain (1963).
  • Kynaston, David (1 December 2010). Austerity Britain, 1945-1951. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8027-7958-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Levin, Bernard. The Pendulum Years: Britain and the Sixties (1989)
  • Marr, Andrew. A History of Modern Britain (2009); covers 1945–2005.
  • Metzger, Rainer. London in the Sixties (2012) heavily illustrated on music, film, theatre, arts
  • Montgomery, John. The Fifties (1960).
  • Sampson, Anthony. The Anatomy of Britain (1962); see Anatomy of Britain
    • Sampson, Anthony. The New Anatomy of Britain (1982), completely revised
    • Sampson, Anthony. Who Runs This Place?: The Anatomy of Britain in the 21st Century (2005)
  • Sandbrook, Dominic. Never Had It So Good: A History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles (2006) 928pp; excerpt and text search; 920pp
    • Sandbrook, Dominic. White Heat: A History of Britain in the Swinging Sixties (2 vol 2007)
    • Sandbrook, Dominic. State of Emergency: The Way We Were: Britain 1970–1974 (2011); 730pp
    • Sandbrook, Dominic. Seasons in the Sun: The Battle for Britain, 1974–1979 (2013), 990pp
  • Sked, Alan; Cook, Chris (1979). Post-war Britain: a political history. Harvester Press. ISBN 978-0-06-496322-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Stewart, Graham. Bang! A History of Britain in the 1980s (2013) excerpt and text search; 560pp
  • Turner, Alwyn W. Crisis? What Crisis? Britain in the 1970s (2008)
    • Turner, Alwyn W. Rejoice! Rejoice!: Britain in the 1980s (2013).
    • Turner, Alwyn W. A Classless Society: Britain in the 1990s (2013); 650pp
  • Weight, Richard. MOD: From Bebop to Britpop, Britain's Biggest Youth Movement (2013), by a scholar
  • Whitehead, Philip. The Writing on the Wall: Britain in the Seventies (1985); 456 pp
  • Wilson, A.N. Our Times: The Age of Elizabeth II (2009), by a scholar

Statistics

  • Halsey, A. H., ed. Twentieth-Century British Social Trends (2000) excerpt and text search; 762 pp of social statistics
  • Mitchell, B. R. British Historical Statistics (2011); first edition was Mitchell and Phyllis Deane. Abstract of British Historical Statistics (1972) 532pp; economic and some social statistics
  • Wybrow, Robert J. "Britain Speaks Out, 1937-87 (1989), summaries of Gallup public opinion polls.

Historiography