Jump to content

User talk:Ceranthor: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Re: Mount Baker: new section
Line 403: Line 403:


The first copy-editing pass is done—be sure to address the comments; I will probably come back for a second pass and reread. I recommend asking somebody else to look at the article, maybe Ruslik? [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 23:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
The first copy-editing pass is done—be sure to address the comments; I will probably come back for a second pass and reread. I recommend asking somebody else to look at the article, maybe Ruslik? [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 23:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

== I'm done with RFA...*note to self* ==

Just in case anyone cares, I've decided that RFA is totally over-rated, and I will now rarely !vote in discussion. It's full of people who just support without actually evaluating the candidate. This doesn't apply to you if you previously knew the user, but it's really not fair to just support based on other people's opinions. Have your own mind, people.

Revision as of 22:08, 14 January 2009


TIRED, RESTING



Hello, there I am Ceranthor-elda, king of the elves. For many years I have ruled this forest, and my people live in harmony. I go by many names;you may have known me either as LordSunday, Meldshal (a redirect), or Meldshal42.

Work

  • Note you can also contact me often on Commons.

Mostly around here I build articles. I also patrol the newpages and recent changes tools. I contribute to AIV and UAA, but mostly focus on AFD and IFD. I'm also responsible for WP:FACIAL with Pedro and Nancy.

So far, I've contributed some featured articles substantially, a bunch of good articles, and and a bunch of featured pictures. As well as a hell lot more of stuff.

I'm the creator of WikiProject Earthquakes, and also actively contribute to WikiProject Volcanoes, and WikiProject Solar System articles, but most of my contributions are towards science.


Got a question? See the talk page!

Daily Kitten is watching

William Howard Taft
Photograph credit: Pach Brothers; restored by Adam Cuerden


File:Lordsundaylogo.PNG

Those who say it cannot be done should not stand in the way of those who are doing it.

In memory of the 2,374. You are dearly remembered.


Always remember that...

  • I am trustworthy, remember that you can always trust me.
  • My lifestyle is something in between humorous and boring. I do both, The Raven is something I enjoy, however, I also enjoy Alex Borstein. See the difference?
  • I'm artistic. Not in the physical way but the mental. I know most of you are like what?, but for those who this is meant for, well, you understand.
  • I am adventurous. I like working on all kinds of new things.
  • I enjoy old music (oldies). You may not, but that's quite alright.
  • I am not brash. I always take plenty of time before I decide on something.
  • This is the most important thing about me — I don't care what you do to me. No matter what, I'll always forgive you.
  • Now for the really important stuff:
  • I take the idea of "Treat others as you want to be treated" very seriously.
  • Also, I take deep offense to anyone who speaks down to me because of my age. Seriously!
Understand this well. I do not make fun in this above information. Alright!


I was previously known as Meldshal42. I cleaned out my userpage once again because it was overcrowding. In case I am ever checkusered and believed to be a sockpuppet, Zelink546, one of my adoptees, is a real life friend, who has edited from this computer a couple of times.

Apparently, I have a good heart.

Me: On Commons On Wiktionary On WikiQuote Volcanoes Wiki - Sysop and Bureaucrat Earthquakes Wiki - Sysop and Bureaucrat

|}

The Signpost
Volume 20
Issue 12
4 September 2024

Mediated

Re: Question

I wouldn't object; it's not an article I frequently edit anyway; my only question is whether you intend to focus on the asteroid belt or whether such a formation section would also apply to all asteroids including (perhaps) the centuars. Serendipodous 22:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed. However, both Formation and evolution of the Solar System and asteroid belt have a section on asteroid belt formation, so if I were to consider adding a formation section to asteroid I'd make it more general. Serendipodous 22:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right now I'm revising the maths on List of Solar System bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium, which is a suicidally boring task. Eventually, once major work on the Solar System lists is finished, I intend to go onto Jupiter Trojan, the last unfinished component of the Jupiter subtopic. Serendipodous 22:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoo boy. You do realise that now I'm counting on you to get Hills Cloud up to FA level? Because it will have to be included in the Solar System FT. Serendipodous 23:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Winter Solstice

Hi Ceran, hadn't realised you were also Sunday. This is to atone for the hard time I gave you at FAC. ϢereSpielChequers 13:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Thatcher

Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. I believe that I have addressed your concerns. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 18:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1975 Morris earthquake

Updated DYK query On 21 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1975 Morris earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup notice

The 2009 WikiCup will begin on January 1, 2009. The first round will run through March 31, 2009. For more information on this tournament, read the "about" section on the main WikiCup page.

This year, we have a different system in calculating points. At User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions, you will find information about submitting your article (and other) work to earn points. Each contestant will have their own individual subpage for submitting completed work to us.

This year, User:ST47 will also be running one of his bots to calculate mainspace edits and read your submission subpages to calculate the point values you receive based on our scoring chart.

Questions or comment? Ask at the talk page or go directly to Garden or IMatthew's talk page. Good luck and Happy Holidays! -- ayematthew and Garden. 14:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the copyedit. :) –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 14:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done with the review of your volcano article. Yeah, that would be cool to collaborate on an article. In fact, there have been cases where hurricanes trigger earthquakes... –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 15:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I'm just very strict with prose. Good work with that article. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 15:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I'll take a look. Just so I know, which sections of the article have you finished? –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 15:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I copyedited about half the article (since simply listing prose issues would have been to easy :)). I'll finish it up in a few minutes. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 15:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unitarian greetings

Nevado del Ruiz

I am afraid, but the article has a serious problem and is unlikely to pass now. The problem is the use of copy-pasted lightly paraphrased text from the cited sources. I want to say that it was a bad idea from the beginning. I suggest you to withdraw the nomination, than rewrite offending text in your own words and renominate after that. If you want I can help you. I should have raised this issue before, because I noticed several such examples in the past. Meanwhile, Happy new year! Ruslik (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel better!

ayematthew @ 21:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PR

No problem,  Done. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, looks pretty good now that my comments have been addressed. Good luck with the article! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, could you come on IRC for a sec? Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am quite busy in reaql life at the moment - I can make some comments, but iot will likely take me several days. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1970 Tonghai

I'm not sure if 1970 Tonghai is long enough to become an FA. I guess it's worth a shot, but it's pretty hard to bring it up unless it is >15 kb. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 13:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but most of them are on storms that generally stayed out to sea and didn't kill anyone. 1970 Tonghai killed 15,000 people. See the difference? ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 13:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. I'm currently working on Dahomeyan politicians and coups like Hubert Maga and Maurice Kouandete. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 15:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Thanks for your note, but I have left FPC (at least for a while) - my reasons are on the FPC talk page, "Signing off". Wishing you a Happy 2009! --Janke | Talk 14:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by neuro(talk) for Garden and ayematthew at 20:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hell's Gate National Park

Hell's Gate National Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.

While looking at some Good Articles by a nominator I am currently reviewing, I noticed that another editor had raised concerns about this article which you had passed as a GA. I share those concerns. I am opening up a review. SilkTork *YES! 20:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dear Ceranthor,

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

Kind regards,

Majorly talk 21:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New project suggestion

Hey. I'm just wondering if you are interested in making a new project on seamounts. Seamounts are not within the scope of the Mountains WikiProject and there's an overlap with the Volcanoes WikiProject. But I don't know how to create a new wikiproject so that's why I'm asking you if you're interested or not. Contact me on my talk page if you have any suggestions. Black Tusk (talk) 02:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Apocalypse

Meh, even if it does happen, the East Coast will be fine. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Review

Happy "late" New Year's to you too. Hope 2009 is starting to be a good year for ya. :) Did I review an article of yours? I don't remember. Sure, I'll review your article, but the review won't be done today, cause I'm busy working on other stuff right now, if that's cool with you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. :P Alright, cool just wanted to make sure all was cool. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceranthor,

Just wondering if you had an opinion about Edit 2 (processing from original file) to confirm this as the leading FPC? Thanks. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 13:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to finish this article? Two things need to be done. 1) I think, the giant quote should be moved to the Armero tragedy article. You can replace it with a short summary. 2) Try to find all places where the text follows sources too closely and try to rewrite it in your own words. I have just expanded parts about geology of the eruption on the basis of the Science article. Ruslik (talk) 17:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph in the 'Geology' section too closely follows this website (ref 13). Ruslik (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article should provide more information about flora, fauna, social and environmental value of of Nevado del Ruiz. There is a good source (ref 8). Ruslik (talk) 09:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ping. :) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Hot springs of Pamukkale edit cropped.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Wronkiew (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Ceran →(cheerchime →carol) 02:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you would like to know I created another article about an earthquake on Vancouver Island in 1918. Black Tusk (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Electron GA review

Hi,

I look forward to reading your GA review of the Electron article. Thank you.—RJH (talk) 20:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished reviewing the article. Here is the review. Ceran →(cheerchime →carol) 12:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I think I have addressed your concerns. Could you take another look?—RJH (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ursula Franklin

As requested, here is a note reminding you to go to the Ursula Franklin entry which is a featured article candidate and give it a complete read through. Thanks. Bwark (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

RE: WikiCup error

Have you put it on User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions/Ceranthor? Use the instructions on User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions. Thanks! Garden. 21:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first copy-editing pass is done—be sure to address the comments; I will probably come back for a second pass and reread. I recommend asking somebody else to look at the article, maybe Ruslik? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with RFA...*note to self*

Just in case anyone cares, I've decided that RFA is totally over-rated, and I will now rarely !vote in discussion. It's full of people who just support without actually evaluating the candidate. This doesn't apply to you if you previously knew the user, but it's really not fair to just support based on other people's opinions. Have your own mind, people.