Jump to content

User talk:Prioryman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Another picture for the Meermin…?: tweak – this image is (almost) definitely from Groenewegen (1789)!
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 525: Line 525:
==Thanks!==
==Thanks!==
Thankyou for your barnstar and your kind words. Pleased you appreciate the effort that went into it. Best regards.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 12:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Thankyou for your barnstar and your kind words. Pleased you appreciate the effort that went into it. Best regards.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 12:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

== Another picture for the ''Meermin''…? ==

Hello Prioryman, thanks again for the wonderful job you did of retrieving the illustration of a ship from Groenewegen, Gerrit (1789), [http://www.worldcat.org/title/verzameling-van-vier-en-tachtig-stuks-hollandsche-schepen/oclc/11460854&referer=brief_results ''Verzameling van vier en tachtig stuks Hollandsche schepen''], for the [[Meermin slave mutiny|''Meermin'' slave mutiny]] article. I've been looking around for more images, and was pointed ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request&diff=477192227&oldid=477182562 here]) to [http://www.mermaidguesthouse.com/images/ship1%20copy.png this picture]: judging by the caption, it looks certain that this image is from the same source as the other one! It looks to me like it's another angle on the same type of ship, too. Thing is, the ''Meermin'' slave mutiny article is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Main_Page/Day_after_tomorrow&oldid=433914969 presently slated for a Main Page appearance on Saturday]: if there's a chance that we could get that image by then, obviously that would be fab! Any thoughts? No worries if not! :o) [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 13:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:02, 16 February 2012

Re: Battle of Vukovar FAC

I'm generally okay with the idea, though I'm not done proofreading it myself, either. I was certainly planning to keep an eye on the FAC comments in any case, so feel free to list me. In fact I'm pretty sure you could recruit any of the other four involved .hr editors for it, I'm sure they'd all appreciate the prestige :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, can you set up an e-mail address for me to be able to contact you that way, please? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done, and thanks. I think it might be a bit over the top to list five editors as co-sponsors though! Prioryman (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BTW did you get my mail? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAC's been closed now, but reviewing my comments I realize that I accidentally wrote "publishers" when I meant "publisher locations" - you're right, all of the books included publishers. Sorry for the confusion. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great article. Well done for your hard work. --John (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies for implying that you thought nefarious forces against your review requests. I need to remember that a humorously intended statement is hard to convey in a text-only environment. [self-applies small trout]. -- saberwyn 00:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suckers (band)

Hi Prioryman, you nominated Suckers (band) for deletion under "G2: Test page". At the time, it was mis-formatted because a newbie was still working on it. Please be a little more cautious in these situations. Thanks! Melchoir (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vukovar ACR

Hi! I noticed that the last FAC brought up matter of British vs American spelling inconsistencies in the article as an obstacle. I'm willing to tackle those myself, but I'd like to check first with you would you prefer to end up with BE or AE spelling in the end - I noticed the British English tag in the talk page, but just to be on the safe side...--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BE, please! Prioryman (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrolling

Thank you for patrolling new pages. I'm just letting you know that I have declined your CSD A7 on Roshini Shetty because there is enough information on the page to suggest that the subject may be notable. I have placed a WP:BLPPROD template on the article instead. For more information please see WP:NPP and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! -Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation of Pigeon Snaring

I'm a Wikipedia neophyte so thanks for helping me with the capitalisation. I'd love to hear any other advice or feedback you might have.-- JJManioke (talk) 07:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sve hrvatske pobjede za Vukovar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sve hrvatske pobjede za Vukovar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for SS Robert E. Peary

Orlady (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Congratulations on the work you did on Battle of Vukovar. John (talk) 04:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vukovar, again

Did you notice this? Sorry to bother you yet again, you must be regretting the nomination! It's a great article on a very difficult topic, when this gets promoted you should have a beer or three. --John (talk) 08:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I missed that - just checked and it's fine. Prioryman (talk) 08:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Mr Davenport

Please do not remove the citation requests unless you are adding references that resolve them. Thanks. Fmph (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was because of your unsupported assertions on the talk page that I marked the points in your additions which were not supported by the references you added. Some seem to know have been addressed although not very well. Nowhere does it say that the property was valued (a positive action that implies a professional viewing the property and making an informed judgement) @ £50mil. But we will let that one go. Now all we need are the details of the introduction. Fmph (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Prioryman! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Vukovar

Congratulations on the FA promotion. Great work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:25, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Croatian Barnstar of Merit
For your outstanding effort in improving Battle of Vukovar and getting it to featured article I hereby award you the Croatian Barnstar of Merit (although you probably deserve several more :-). I wish I had your patience and persistence. Do keep it up, Prioryman! Timbouctou (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vukovar

Right back atcha ;)

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For outstanding referencing work on the Battle of Vukovar. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also liked your original prose very much, which made me quite ambivalent towards the FAC-induced simplification. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I concur with Joy. I think the article was somewhat better before FAR. Timbouctou (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battle of Vukovar TFAR

Yep, I know, I'm tracking it all. Thanks again :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say you did an amazing job with the article, and thank you for all your hard work :). --71.202.63.69 (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Toilet god

Hello! Your submission of Toilet god at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HurricaneFan25 18:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, great article :P HurricaneFan25 18:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Port an Eilean Mhòir ship burial

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Prioryman. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyrus Cylinder

Hello Prioryman, First off, let me thank you for some of the fine work that you’ve done on making the Cyrus Cylinder page (particularly in your retitles, on the history of its discovery, the dispute between IRI and the British Museum [aside: boy, the Brits do indeed like to take things from other lands and put them in their museums!], as well as the Exhibition in Iran update).

I am concerned, however, that your edits on 08:29, 2011 November 5‎ Prioryman (talk | contribs)‎ (89,345 bytes), are not quite what I consider useful. In particular, what seems to be opinionated viewpoints. Example: “However, the Cylinder's account of Cyrus's conquest clearly does not tell the whole story. Although the Persians do seem to have entered Babylon without serious resistance, the text does not mention the preceding Battle of Opis, in which Cyrus's forces defeated and apparently massacred Nabonidus's army.”

1) It reads far too much as if there was subterfuge afoot in the creation of the Cylinder as if the Cylinder was create to mislead. 2) There is no evidence that Cyrus’s army ever MASSACARED Nabodinus’s army. In fact, the historical evidence is that Cyrus was benign by ancient and modern standards in terms of the invasion. 3) The three historians being cited are opining (however educated their opinions may be), not definitively stating, that the cylinder did not tell the whole story.

To tell you the truth, I think that the whole section on the analysis of the cylinder’s claim is really not useful and subject to biases in terms of what analyses are included. There are very little articles on wikipedia referencing proclamations and announcement (declarations of independence, the magna carta, etc) that analyze the claims of those proclamations. Perhaps it might be better to remove the section altogether.

This being said, I am going to make some revisions addressing my concerns. Best, GoetheFromm (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Toilet god

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Evidence

Do I put my responses to your allegations in the same section which you have written or another? The Last Angry Man (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, Mark, you need to wait until it's posted as a sockpuppet investigation - then you get to have your say. Prioryman (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: Battle of Vukovar

This is a note to let the main editors of Battle of Vukovar know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 18, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 18, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Destroyed Serbian tank at Vukovar

The Battle of Vukovar was an 87-day siege of the Croatian town of Vukovar by the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) and paramilitaries from Serbia, between August–November 1991. In 1990, Croatian Serb separatists launched an armed uprising, supported by Serbian President Slobodan Milošević, and seized control of Serb-populated areas of Croatia. The JNA intervened in favour of the Croatian Serbs and launched an offensive in August 1991 against Croatian government-held territory. Vukovar was defended by around 1,800 lightly armed Croatian soldiers and civilian volunteers, against 36,000 JNA soldiers and Serbian paramilitaries equipped with heavy armour and artillery. When the town fell on 18 November 1991 after prolonged fighting, hundreds were massacred by Serb forces and the town's non-Serb population was expelled. Vukovar was peacefully reintegrated into Croatia in 1998 after the end of the Croatian War of Independence and has since been rebuilt, but deep ethnic divisions remain. Several Serb military and political officials, including Milošević, were later indicted and in some cases jailed for war crimes committed during and after the battle. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work!

The Original Barnstar
Congratulations! Getting the Battle of Vukovar to the FA and then to the main page in time for the 20th anniversary is a truly magnificent achievement. Tomobe03 (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. Prioryman (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Archiving Battle of Vukovar talk page?

Sure, done. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For your brilliant and timely effort in making the Battle of Vukovar the today's featured article. GregorB (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions to Arbs

I have sent you the other day an email with quack quack evidence. Can you please firstly confirm that you have received it.

Additionally, as I mentioned at User_talk:Russavia#Your_query I have asked individual arbs who are running for re-election to the Committee specific questions in relation to the Clarification request that they have so far basically ignored in providing straight answers for. You will find the questions, and their answers, on the individual candidacy pages.

I don't think it is fair only to subject those Arbs seeking re-election to such questions, and am thinking of asking individual arbs the same questions on their talk pages, to see if they will answer them, and I will make a note of their responses (or lack thereof) at their future candicacy.

Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads up in case you want to check out the questions and their answers in relation to this case. Russavia Let's dialogue 14:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Silverdale Hoard

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]

I've created it as a redirect, and added it to the dab page at Old Town Hall. PamD 20:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, thanks for doing that. By the way, I've nominated the article for DYK, so you should see a DYK credit on your user talk page in the next few days. Prioryman (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas

Season's greetings!
I hope the holiday season is relaxing and fulfilling, and that 2012 will be fruitful for you. --John (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and best wishes! GregorB (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Xmas!

DYK for Lancaster City Museum

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Regarding "Shivdeep Lande"

Hai Prioryman,

Mr.Shivdeep lande is one of the Indian Police service (IPS) officer. No other encyclopedia had biography about Shivdeep lande. Thats why, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivdeep_lande This page is important.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahamed5zal (talkcontribs) 12:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Hey man, have a very merry Christmas! All the best! Timbouctou (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lagan Canal

Thanks for the kind words about the Lagan Canal article. I was working on Robert Whitworth, noted that he assessed the plans for the Lagan, then noted that the wikilink to it was red, so found there was no article, and thought there should be. Hope the DYK goes well. Bob1960evens (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you too. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adele Goodman Clark DYK review

I redid the article with inline citations - is everything good to go now? –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 02:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Račak massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass killing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meridian 5

Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]

DYK nomination of Lagan Canal

Hello! Your submission of Lagan Canal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Titanic 100 years...
I have seen your improvements of the Sinking of the RMS Titanic article and would like to help. As it is now I think it is close to Good Article with some regrouping of text and improvements of images. I will try to make some illustrations of the ship, but will have to do some research first. Soerfm (talk)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I am visiting the Muse Art gallery in Hyderabad and i have attended all the art events curated by Kaali sudheer. He is doing a fantastic community service in the areas of Art . helping the budding, young, women artists to show case their talent and build their careers in the art . i spoke to him in length and understood that we need to have a wikipedia page for him so that it will be of use for Artists who want to show their works and get benefited. As the gallery is a not to profit started by a big name like Marriott and Marriott have partnered with kaali sudheer. Thought it will be of great use for artists around the world to use this wonderful space and show their talent. I have given the external links of well known sources like US consulate of Hyderabad , Confederation of Indian Industry ( CII) , Yahoo News and well known news papers Hindu and postnoon etc Gregx1872 (talk) 22:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lagan Canal

The DYK project (nominate) 14:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Jack Doran

The DYK project (nominate) 07:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Croatian independence referendum, 1991, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Slavonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Norwegian butter crisis

The DYK project (nominate) 15:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Prioryman! (-: — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Four Counties Ring

The DYK project (nominate) 23:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ferdynand Goetel

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Yellala Falls

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Portland Fire Station No. 7

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nelson W. Fisk

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Léon Azéma

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hallaton Helmet

Just a quick note to say thanks for the great improvements to Hallaton Helmet you added. A much improved article - worthy of submission for 'Did you know' IMHO. Cheers Londonclanger (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Baluarte Bridge

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bunkers in Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valbona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tablet of Shamash

Thanks a lot, it was fast and it's exactly what I wanted (we can see clearly the god and the symbols). Zunkir (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to help! Prioryman (talk) 19:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hallaton Helmet

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Spa Road railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Eastern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bunkers in Albania

Orlady (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Blocked 27.100.16.185

Yep, I was just getting to that after rev deleting the page history. Thanks, The Helpful One 17:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your excellent work on Bunkers in Albania. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sinking of the RMS Titanic has been promoted to GA

Thank you for nominating Sinking of the RMS Titanic for Good Article, and for being prepared to work through all the suggestions that were put forward during the GA Review. I have promoted the article to GA and listed it at Wikipedia:Good articles/Engineering and technology#Maritime transport.

You are now qualified to volunteer to do GA reviews of articles that are nominated for GA status! Regards, Dolphin (t) 22:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: DYK nomination of Sisingamangaraja XII

Thanks for expanding the article. Sorry for my bad grammar. I want to add infobox to it. Which kind of infobox should I use? αδζ ψακ φρψερ 00:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It looks like Template:Infobox officeholder might be the most appropriate. Prioryman (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Barnes Cemetery

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Danish sculpture DYK

Please see my slightly modified suggestion at Template:Did you know nominations/Danish sculpture. Thanks also for your positive comments on the article and your additions from Nelson. - Ipigott (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lydd Town DYK

Hi, I've replied to your review of my nomination. Thanks for the comments! Delsion23 (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Left you a note at Template:Did you know nominations/Ladies Memorial Association. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

National Helmet Week 2012

Sorry, I forget to say thanks. I'm told that the crosby might have looked liked that before the restoration Victuallers (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eston Railway Station

Hi Prioryman! I've had a quick scan through your page about the Eston Railway Station - looking good! I've just linked Eston Hills to Eston Nab. I wrote the Eston Nab page because it had been hijacked by the company that transmits from the mast there. Perhaps I should have called the page Eston Hills. Best wishes, Francis Hannaway 21:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! As it happens, I was already writing an article about the Eston Hills to fill that particular gap. I've just posted a draft for you to see, at User:Prioryman/Eston Hills. It's some way from completion though. I'll probably merge your Eston Nab page into that, if you have no objections. Prioryman (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I think you might like the hook I've come up with for the "did you know" nomination for Eston railway station - see Template:Did you know nominations/Eston railway station... Prioryman (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Spa Road railway station

The DYK project (nominate) 00:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
Thanks Prioryman for helping to promote Icelandic Phallological Museum to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic FAC

Fixed a few tiny things. Best of luck. If you want a hand, let me know. Would love to see it on the main page for the 100th anniversary. Steven Zhang Join the DR army! 10:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

National Maritime Museum

Just dropping you a line about your Titanic microgrant - you mention the National Maritime Museum - I have a contact there who is interested in Wikipedia stuff, happy to put you in touch if you think there would be any value in that! Drop me an email if you like. Regards, The Land (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sinking of the RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RMS Mauretania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaali Sudheer

I have visiting the Muse Art gallery in Hyderabad and i have attended all the art events curated by Kaali sudheer. He is doing a fantastic community service in the areas of Art . helping the budding, young, women artists to show case their talent and build their careers in the art . i spoke to him in length and understood that we need to have a wikipedia page for him so that it will be of use for Artists who want to show their works and get benefited. As the gallery is a not to profit started by a big name like Marriott and Marriott have partnered with kaali sudheer. Thought it will be of great use for artists around the world to use this wonderful space and show their talent. I have given the external links of well known sources like US consulate of Hyderabad , Confederation of Indian Industry ( CII) , Yahoo News and well known news papers Hindu and postnoon etc. I do not agree with your deletion as In India Esp in south India there is hardly any art appreciation. there are very few art galleries in Hyderabad and that too all galleries are commercial one. Kaali sudheer has stated this to promote artists supported by Marriott. Kaali Sudheer has been doing a good work in the area of art. i object your decision for deletion pleas http://www.hybiz.tv/Kaali-Sudheer--MUSE-Art-Gallery/165227 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregx1872 (talkcontribs) 19:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you talking about? I've had nothing to do with any deletion requests about this person. Prioryman (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Harmondsworth Great Barn

Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks!

Thankyou for your barnstar and your kind words. Pleased you appreciate the effort that went into it. Best regards.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another picture for the Meermin…?

Hello Prioryman, thanks again for the wonderful job you did of retrieving the illustration of a ship from Groenewegen, Gerrit (1789), Verzameling van vier en tachtig stuks Hollandsche schepen, for the Meermin slave mutiny article. I've been looking around for more images, and was pointed (here) to this picture: judging by the caption, it looks certain that this image is from the same source as the other one! It looks to me like it's another angle on the same type of ship, too. Thing is, the Meermin slave mutiny article is presently slated for a Main Page appearance on Saturday: if there's a chance that we could get that image by then, obviously that would be fab! Any thoughts? No worries if not! :o) Nortonius (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]