Talk:Black Lives Matter: Difference between revisions
Line 216: | Line 216: | ||
== Anti-Semitism == |
== Anti-Semitism == |
||
There needs to be a section in this article concerning the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world. Framing them as warriors against racism and neglecting to add a full list of their |
There needs to be a section in this article concerning the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world. Framing them as warriors against racism and neglecting to add a full list of their controversies may lead readers to assume they do not hold racist dogmas. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FactChecker200000|FactChecker200000]] ([[User talk:FactChecker200000#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FactChecker200000|contribs]]) 17:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:{{u|FactChecker200000}}, and what [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] do you have regarding {{tq|the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world}}? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
:{{u|FactChecker200000}}, and what [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] do you have regarding {{tq|the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world}}? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
*See [[WP:RSP]]. ''New York Post'' is not a reliable source, especially for politically sensitive subjects. ''The Spectator'' is primarily an opinion-based publication, and should not be used for facts stated in Wikipedia's voice. Blogs are not normally reliable sources. The last one only says that someone accused them of antisemitism, not that they ''were'' anti-Semitic. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 19:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
*See [[WP:RSP]]. ''New York Post'' is not a reliable source, especially for politically sensitive subjects. ''The Spectator'' is primarily an opinion-based publication, and should not be used for facts stated in Wikipedia's voice. Blogs are not normally reliable sources. The last one only says that someone accused them of antisemitism, not that they ''were'' anti-Semitic. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 19:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
* Blogs and unreliable sources aside, many of these sources make no mention of antisemitism or Jewish people and only comment support for Palestine or criticisms of the actions of the government of Israel. We cannot use them to throw together a subsection about antisemitism in the BLM movement. [[User:FactChecker200000]] might come back with another dump of articles to look at, but searching through the depths of the internet to find the perfect source to make the article say what you want it to say is kind of the definition of [[WP:CHERRY|cherry-picking]], isn't it? <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 17:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC) |
* Blogs and unreliable sources aside, many of these sources make no mention of antisemitism or Jewish people and only comment support for Palestine or criticisms of the actions of the government of Israel. We cannot use them to throw together a subsection about antisemitism in the BLM movement. [[User:FactChecker200000]] might come back with another dump of articles to look at, but searching through the depths of the internet to find the perfect source to make the article say what you want it to say is kind of the definition of [[WP:CHERRY|cherry-picking]], isn't it? <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 17:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
I did indeed read said articles, the three sources you provided me were three of the most liberal publications available. Yet when I provide a variety of sources, both corporate and personal, domestic and international, you claim I am cherry-picking? In regard to your apologist sources, they dismiss any and all accusations of antisemitism as fringe groups of people involved in said protests, denying the fact that they held such beliefs, instead turning to their endorsements from Jewish advocacy groups. In your own "PolitiFact" sources, even the TLDR section states the discontent many Jews feel towards the movement. This is specifically in the graffiti and defamation which occurs during riots. And, while leaders may downplay Anti-Semitic acts, it most certainly does not speak for the group as a whole. |
|||
My point in making this thread was to point out the controversies surrounding BLM. I didn't come to argue with you, rather state the obvious. My feeling here is that you are more concerned with defending BLM than including the factual information, which is the controversy surrounding how many Jews feel towards BLM rhetoric. To say there is no tension between BLM and Jewish-Americans would imply there to be little or no mention of the phenomena in major news outlets. But there is. Therefore, we must only assume there is precedence for people seeking answers on the topic. Wikipedia's job is to document a full catalogue on a particular topic, controversies very much included. The fact we are even having this conversation right now and were both able to pull from mainstream news sources to defend are case is, in fact, evidence of controversy. |
|||
I am sorry you may not feel the same way as me, but I respect your right to your own opinions. However, Wikipedia is not your opinion piece, as I mentioned it is to serve as a guide to a topic, and a branch to other sources. To ignore this controversy over one of the biggest movements in history in favor of your own political beliefs is a disservice to the platform, and the reader. Thank you for your time. |
Revision as of 21:45, 1 February 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black Lives Matter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | Black Lives Matter has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Black Lives Matter-themed signs was copied or moved into Black Lives Matter with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | Other talk page banners | ||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2015. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bmb8aq, Chesar48, Scasteel22, Eliyanii, Yoshisaur, Jes Zepol.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tts92.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2016. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): M.nie. Peer reviewers: Dmlee26.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2016. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bustelo&mezcal.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2017. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Gracemorgan192.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Itslovetiana.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of the riots, anarchy and violence conducted by BLM protestors?
mostly just WP:NOTHERE WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
For the most obvious reasons I think the majority of people can agree that BLM is a movement however no one can deny that violence, arson, property damage, and anarchy were a recurring aspect in 2020 after the death of George Floyd. I don't understand why this isn't mentioned in the article, are the editors of Wikipedia in complete denial of criminal acts committed by BLM activists? Or do the editors have a biased leftist agenda when it comes to certain controversial topics like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paok117 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
I wouldn’t really call them “peaceful protesters” tbh they nearly burnt Minneapolis to the ground had it not been for the US national guard being deployed to stop the rioters the city would have been destroyed. They also caused $2 billion dollars worth of property damage in June 2020 alone. What is the definition of a “reliable source” btw it sounds pretty biased and censors media publications and tabloids that aren’t aligned with the political left. I’m not going to provide a reference for a news article about this because it will be discredited and censored. Paok117 (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
More than 500 shops and restaurants in Minneapolis and St. Paul have reported damage when protests on five nights turned violent over the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police. Dozens of properties burned to the ground. Owners and insurance experts estimate the costs of the damage could exceed $500 million. Baxter329 (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Dr. Birx Says George Floyd Protests Have Resulted in the Destruction of 70 Covid-19 Testing Sites Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/dr-birx-says-george-floyd-151449109.html Baxter329 (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Minneapolis vandalism targets include 198-unit affordable housing development The apartments were expected to hit the market later this year. June 27, 2020 The under-construction affordable housing development that burned in the widespread violence in south Minneapolis late Wednesday and early Thursday was to be a six-story rental building with 198 apartments for low-income renters, including more than three dozen for very low-income tenants. Construction began last fall on Midtown Corner, which was expected to be completed and ready for occupancy this year. Late Wednesday the wood-framed upper floors of the building were fully engulfed in flames, with thick plumes of smoke that figured prominently in widely viewed photos of the riots. By Thursday morning, what had been an active construction site was reduced to a pile of smoldering ashes atop what was left of the concrete first-floor commercial space. Baxter329 (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC) At least 11 killed during U.S. protests seeking justice for George Floyd, many of them African Americans Baxter329 (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
14 Days Of Protests, 19 Dead June 8, 2020 Though curfews are lifting and protests remain predominantly peaceful, the death toll from two weeks of demonstrations over the death of George Floyd continues to creep upward, with at least 19 people—a majority of whom are black—now dead. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/06/08/14-days-of-protests-19-dead/ Baxter329 (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2022
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the link in section Reactions > "All Lives Matter" > External image to the following: https://chainsawsuit.krisstraub.com/20160707.shtml because the old link is nonfunctional. Hugo jakd (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
BLM website said: “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement”
mostly just WP:NOTHERE WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
But BLM took it down after it was criticized by conservatives. Primary source: https://web.archive.org/web/20200229224723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ Secondary source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/blm-deletes-page-disruption-nuclear-family And here's some info from the New York Times: We know the statistics – that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundations of our community are weaker because of it. I'd like this wikipedia article to address why an organization that claims to care about black lives wants to get rid of the nuclear family, when the evidence from the New York Times shows how harmful that has already been to black people. Baxter329 (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Politifact quote from BLM founder Patrisse Cullors
WP:POINTY/WP:POVPUSH EvergreenFir (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
"We do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia, in particular, are trained organizers; we are trained Marxists. We are superversed on, sort of, ideological theories. And I think what we really try to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many Black folks." Source: https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/ I think this quote should be included in the article. I think the article should explain why an organization called "Black Lives Matter" supports a policy that has created nothing but death, misery, and famine in every country where it has ever been adopted. Far more black lives have been murdered by Marxist governments than by the police in democratic countries. I'd like the article to address these points. Baxter329 (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Anti-Semitism
There needs to be a section in this article concerning the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world. Framing them as warriors against racism and neglecting to add a full list of their controversies may lead readers to assume they do not hold racist dogmas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FactChecker200000 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- FactChecker200000, and what reliable sources do you have regarding
the founder's statements on the Jewish-American, and Jewish populations around the world
? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Here are some reliable sources that address this topic:
- Did you even bother to read that article? Or did you just google a couple of likely terms and WP:REFSPAM? The only mention of BLM in the whole article is
They are more likely to favor civil rights for minorities, whether it’s the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement in the U.S. or overseas
. FDW777 (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Did you even bother to read that article? Or did you just google a couple of likely terms and WP:REFSPAM? The only mention of BLM in the whole article is
- Baxter329 (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I do not have the time right now to read these links, but I can say that supporting Palestinians does not equal anti-Semitism. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Baxter329 (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Here are some sources I believe hold water, thank you for your quick response. These come from a variety of international sources, including the US, UK and Israel.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/21/blms-aggressive-tactics-and-rhetoric-have-led-to-attacks-on-jews/ https://spectator.org/jews-black-lives-matter-letter/ https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/black-lives-matters-jewish-problem-in-their-own-words/ https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/blm-should-look-to-martin-luther-king-not-malcolm-x-for-inspiration https://forward.com/news/456863/did-protesters-at-northwestern-use-an-antisemitic-slur-against-the/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by FactChecker200000 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:RSP. New York Post is not a reliable source, especially for politically sensitive subjects. The Spectator is primarily an opinion-based publication, and should not be used for facts stated in Wikipedia's voice. Blogs are not normally reliable sources. The last one only says that someone accused them of antisemitism, not that they were anti-Semitic. --Jayron32 19:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blogs and unreliable sources aside, many of these sources make no mention of antisemitism or Jewish people and only comment support for Palestine or criticisms of the actions of the government of Israel. We cannot use them to throw together a subsection about antisemitism in the BLM movement. User:FactChecker200000 might come back with another dump of articles to look at, but searching through the depths of the internet to find the perfect source to make the article say what you want it to say is kind of the definition of cherry-picking, isn't it? Vanilla Wizard 💙 17:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I did indeed read said articles, the three sources you provided me were three of the most liberal publications available. Yet when I provide a variety of sources, both corporate and personal, domestic and international, you claim I am cherry-picking? In regard to your apologist sources, they dismiss any and all accusations of antisemitism as fringe groups of people involved in said protests, denying the fact that they held such beliefs, instead turning to their endorsements from Jewish advocacy groups. In your own "PolitiFact" sources, even the TLDR section states the discontent many Jews feel towards the movement. This is specifically in the graffiti and defamation which occurs during riots. And, while leaders may downplay Anti-Semitic acts, it most certainly does not speak for the group as a whole. My point in making this thread was to point out the controversies surrounding BLM. I didn't come to argue with you, rather state the obvious. My feeling here is that you are more concerned with defending BLM than including the factual information, which is the controversy surrounding how many Jews feel towards BLM rhetoric. To say there is no tension between BLM and Jewish-Americans would imply there to be little or no mention of the phenomena in major news outlets. But there is. Therefore, we must only assume there is precedence for people seeking answers on the topic. Wikipedia's job is to document a full catalogue on a particular topic, controversies very much included. The fact we are even having this conversation right now and were both able to pull from mainstream news sources to defend are case is, in fact, evidence of controversy. I am sorry you may not feel the same way as me, but I respect your right to your own opinions. However, Wikipedia is not your opinion piece, as I mentioned it is to serve as a guide to a topic, and a branch to other sources. To ignore this controversy over one of the biggest movements in history in favor of your own political beliefs is a disservice to the platform, and the reader. Thank you for your time.
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Unassessed Canada-related articles
- Unknown-importance Canada-related articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Canada's 10,000 Challenge
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class African diaspora articles
- High-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- GA-Class Black Lives Matter articles
- Top-importance Black Lives Matter articles
- GA-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- GA-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- GA-Class Law enforcement articles
- Mid-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- GA-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class sociology articles
- High-importance sociology articles
- GA-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of High-importance
- GA-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- GA-Class United States History articles
- High-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report