Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎10 May 2009: rem Northern Cyprus, closed as sock circus
Line 10: Line 10:


* '''[[:Alla Rakha Khan]] → {{noredirect|Alla Rakha}}''' — use stage name utilized in performances and recordings per [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)]] — {{#ifeq:{{{sig}}}|no||[[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 09:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)}}
* '''[[:Alla Rakha Khan]] → {{noredirect|Alla Rakha}}''' — use stage name utilized in performances and recordings per [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)]] — {{#ifeq:{{{sig}}}|no||[[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 09:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)}}

* '''[[:Rasa (contemporary devotional music)]] → {{noredirect|Rasa (band)}}''' — [[Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Album_and_song_titles_and_band_names]] — {{#ifeq:{{{sig}}}|no||[[Special:Contributions/62.147.37.152|62.147.37.152]] ([[User talk:62.147.37.152|talk]]) 10:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)}}


==Incomplete and contested proposals==
==Incomplete and contested proposals==

Revision as of 10:27, 16 May 2009

Administrator instructions

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.

Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.

Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Uncontroversial requests

Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any reasonable possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required. If you object to a proposal listed here, please relist it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.

Incomplete and contested proposals

With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move proposal, please do not discuss move proposals here. If you support an incomplete or contested move proposal, please consider following the instructions above to complete the proposal, and move it to the "Other proposals" section below under the current date. Proposals that remain incomplete after seven days will be removed.

Other proposals

Purge the cache to refresh this page

16 May 2009

  • Swap Array data structure and Array data type —(Discuss)— Data types are primitive (e.g. Machine data types), whereas data structures are higher-level and more abstract; therefore, the present "data type" article, which describes the more abstract concept, is misnamed. The opposite is true for the sister article. This is all a result of the very recent split of Array. I raised the same issue on the talkpage prior to the split's execution, but there was insufficient input and thus no clear consensus as to the right nomenclature. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tea Party protestsTax Day Tea Party —(Discuss)— The current article seems to cover only the Tax Day Tea Party protests, but with brief statements on the history of Tea Party protests and how they started. This is OK for the article, however, it is encyclopedic to have an article about one event (April 15 Tax Day protests) that suggests it covers all Tea Party protests. The current article also does not cover the different organizations that started the February 27 Chicago Tea Party protests, but instead, the article assumes the same organizations that started a previous event also started the April 15 Tax Day event. This is not the case. Different organizations started these two different Tea Party events. So it not correct to claim the generic article name "Tea Party protests," when in truth the article is only covering the Tax Day Tea Party protests. The allegations between both events are different, and the organizations that guided the events are different, and the outcomes of each event are different; thus, this calls for the generic name "Tea Party protests" to be moved to a clearer name of "Tax Day Tea Party." --Tycoon24 (talk) 01:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

15 May 2009

  • Heather Brooke (author)Heather Brooke —(Discuss)— This is the only article by this name on Wikipedia, so there is no need for disambiguation brackets - it should be located at Heather Brooke. There was formerly another Heather Brooke on Wikipedia, but her article was deleted as non-notable and is unlikely to be recreated. --22:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Robofish (talk)
  • UhuraNyota Uhura - (Discuss) - The character of Uhura never had an "official" first name, but the name "Nyota" was used for years in unofficial fiction, as well as by Nichelle Nichols, the actress who portrayed the character. The 2009 Trek film firmly establishes that "Nyota" is, in fact, the characters first name, so I think it's time to make the name official on the page title. Aatrek (talk) 04:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vector Man SeriesVectorman —(Discuss)— Vectorman is, I think, clearly the title of the series (to the point where googling "vector man" asks if you meant "vectorman"), and it is unnecessary to add "series" to the article title because there's nothing to disambiguate it with. The page is the copy-pasted contents of Vectorman and Vectorman 2, and I don't know what's necessary to get the histories in sync again. Nifboy (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recklessness (criminal)Recklessness (law) —(Discuss)— Per WP:NCDAB, the disambiguating word should be either the generic class which includes the topic (perhaps "legal term" in this case) or the subject or context in which the topic applies ("law" or maybe "criminal law"). The use of the disambiguating word in this case is not really in keeping with our naming conventions, as it seems like it's just an attempt to fit "Recklessness, criminal" into the frame of Wikipedia's disambiguation system. --—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 12:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why wouldn't this be better just as Criminal recklessness? Jgm (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

Move dated sections here after seven days have passed (August 15 or older).