Jump to content

Spider bite: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 264: Line 264:
===Huntsman spiders (''Heteropoda'')===
===Huntsman spiders (''Heteropoda'')===
{{Main|Huntsman spider}}
{{Main|Huntsman spider}}
[[Image:HuntsmanXcricket.jpg|left|thumb|Huntsman spider (Heteropoda venatoria) eating a cricket]]
[[Image:HuntsmanXcricket.jpg|right|thumb|Huntsman spider (Heteropoda venatoria) eating a cricket]]
The Huntsman spiders have a worldwide reputation for scaring people. They are large, defend their nests, and may move toward people and make threat displays. They frequently enter houses and hunt over the walls and ceilings where they may run rapidly for long distances without pausing. When they actually do bite people, the bites are very unpleasant, but these spiders are not regarded as dangerous. They are quite common in parts of Australia. Australian huntsman spiders are typically non-aggressive except when defending their nests or their young babies.
The Huntsman spiders have a worldwide reputation for scaring people. They are large, defend their nests, and may move toward people and make threat displays. They frequently enter houses and hunt over the walls and ceilings where they may run rapidly for long distances without pausing. When they actually do bite people, the bites are very unpleasant, but these spiders are not regarded as dangerous. They are quite common in parts of Australia. Australian huntsman spiders are typically non-aggressive except when defending their nests or their young babies.



Revision as of 05:16, 21 September 2009

Spider bite
SpecialtyEmergency medicine Edit this on Wikidata
Chelicerae of a black wishbone (nemesiid) spider, a mygalomorph

A spider bite is an injury resulting from a spider's accidental or defensive interaction with humans. Although 98-99% of spider bites are harmless,[1] more rarely, the symptoms of their bites can include necrotic wounds, systemic toxicity and, in some cases, death. Four genera are known to have potentially lethal bites.[2]

In almost all cases of spider bite, the chief concern is the spider's venom. Spiders regarded as dangerous possess venom that is toxic to humans, in quantities that can be delivered by a single bite.

Experts on spider bites have noted that misdiagnoses of bites by both the general public and the medical community are quite common; many other conditions and diseases are confused with spider bites, sometimes preventing or delaying proper remedy, which can lead to deleterious outcomes[3]. For example, there are numerous documented infectious and non-infectious conditions (including pyoderma gangrenosum, bacterial infections by Staphylococcus (including MRSA) and Streptococcus, herpes, diabetic ulcer, fungal infections, chemical burns, toxicodendron dermatitis, squamous cell carcinoma, localized vasculitis, syphilis, toxic epidermal necrolysis, sporotrichosis, and Lyme disease) exhibiting lesions that have been initially misdiagnosed as brown recluse spider bites by medical professionals. Many of these conditions are far more common and more likely to be the source of mysterious necrotic wounds, even in areas where recluses are present[4].

The use of the terms "poison" or "poisonous" in the context of spider bite is discouraged, as poison generally refers to substances which are harmful if absorbed through epithelial linings (e.g., eaten, or absorbed through the skin). The effect of eating spiders is, in general, unknown, but some spiders (such as tarantulas) are consumed as food.[5]

Spider venom

The chief concern with the bite of medically significant spiders is the effect of the spider's venom. A spider envenomation occurs whenever a spider bites someone and chooses to inject venom into the wound. Not all spider bites involve injection of venom into the wound, and the amount of venom injected can vary based on the type of spider and the circumstances of the encounter. With very few exceptions, such as the so-called camel spider (which is not a true spider), the mechanical injury from a spider bite is not a serious concern for humans. Some spider bites do leave a large enough wound that infection may be a concern, and other species are known to consume prey which is already dead, which also may pose a risk for transmission of infectious bacteria from a bite. [6] However, it is generally the toxicity of spider venom which poses the most risk to human beings; several spiders are known to have venom which can be fatal to humans in the amounts that a spider will typically inject when biting.

All spiders are capable of producing venom, with the exception of the hackled orb-weavers, the Holarchaeidae, and the primitive Mesothelae. (Other arachnids often confused with spiders, such as the harvestman and sun spiders, also do not produce venom). Nonetheless, only a small percentage of species have bites which pose a danger to people. Many spiders do not have mouthparts capable of penetrating human skin. While venoms are by definition toxic substances, most spiders do not have venom which is sufficiently toxic (in the quantities delivered) to require medical attention and, of those that do, only a few are known to produce fatalities.

Spider venoms work on one of two fundamental principles; they are either neurotoxic (attacking the nervous system) or necrotic (attacking tissues surrounding the bite, and in some cases, attacking vital organs and systems).

Neurotoxic venom

The majority of spiders with serious bites possess a neurotoxic venom of some sort, though the specific manner in which the nervous system is attacked varies from spider to spider.[7][8][9]

Necrotic venom

Spiders known to have necrotic venom are found in the family Sicariidae, a family which includes both the recluse spiders and the six-eyed sand spiders. Spiders in this family possess a known dermonecrotic agent sphingomyelinase D,[11][12] which is otherwise found only in a few pathogenic bacteria.[13][14] Some species in this family are more venomous than others; according to one study, the venom of the Chilean recluse and several species of six-eyed sand spider indigenous to southern Africa, contains an order of magnitude more of this substance than do other Sicariidae spiders such as the brown recluse[15]. Bites by spiders in this family can produce symptoms ranging from minor localized effects, to severe dermonecrotic lesions, up to and including severe systemic reactions including renal failure, and in some cases, death.[16] Even in the absence of systemic effects, serious bites from Sicariidae spiders may form a necrotising ulcer that destroys soft tissue and may take months and very rarely years to heal, leaving deep scars. The damaged tissue may become gangrenous and eventually slough away. Initially there may be no pain from a bite, but over time the wound may grow to as large as 10 inches (25 cm) in extreme cases. Bites usually become painful and itchy within 2 to 8 hours, pain and other local effects worsen 12 to 36 hours after the bite with the necrosis developing over the next few days.[17]

Serious systemic effects may occur before this time, as the venom spreads throughout the body in minutes. Mild symptoms include nausea, vomiting, fever, rashes, and muscle and joint pain. Rarely more severe symptoms occur including hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.[18] Debilitated patients, the elderly, and children may be more susceptible to systemic loxoscelism. Deaths have been reported for both the brown recluse and the related South American species L. laeta and L. intermedia.

Numerous other spiders have been associated with necrotic bites in the medical literature. Examples include the Hobo spider and the Yellow Sac spider. However, the bites from these spiders are not known to produce the severe symptoms that often follow from a recluse spider bite, and the level of danger posed by each has been called into question.[19][20] So far, no known necrotoxins have been isolated from the venom of any of these spiders, and some arachnologists have disputed the accuracy of many spider identifications carried out by bite victims, family members, medical responders, and other non-experts in arachnology. There have been several studies questioning danger posed by some of these spiders. In these studies, scientists examined case studies of bites in which the spider in question was positively identified by an expert, and found that the incidence of necrotic injury diminished significantly when "questionable" identifications were excluded from the sample set. [21][22]

Treatment

Treatment for bites depends on the type of spider in question. Most spider bites are harmless, and will require no first aid. If you experience major discomfort and require medical treatment, and a spider was observed in the act of biting, then a spider expert may be needed to determine the species of spider that has bitten you—identification of the spider's species might determine the proper course of treatment. For this reason it is preferable to capture the spider—either alive, or in a well-preserved condition. Spiders which have been flattened, or which are allowed to desiccate or decay, may not be useful in achieving a positive identification. Most medical responders are not trained to identify spiders, and few hospitals have spider experts on staff. Contrary to media reports, it is not (in general) possible to identify the type of spider responsible for a bite solely from observed symptoms.

Unless a spider is observed in the act of biting, it should not be assumed that a spider bite has occurred (or that a wound, injury, or illness was caused by a spider). Assumption that a reported injury was caused by a spider is the most common source of false reports, which in some cases have often led to misdiagnosis and mistreatment, with potentially life-threatening consequences[23]. Many spider bites, including those by some dangerous species, are relatively painless at first and may go unnoticed if not directly observed. These bites may only be noticed later if serious symptoms appear, in such cases the spider is usually no longer present.

Treatments for more minor bites should be as for any puncture wound. The wound should first be encouraged to bleed to wash out any foreign material and debris. (Many wounds will not bleed because they are so small in diameter that they seal immediately.) Topical antiseptics such as povidone-iodine should be applied on the off chance that the bite introduced some virus or microbe beneath the skin level and that the antiseptic can penetrate to that depth. The bite should be observed for a couple of days so that medical attention can be sought if signs of infection appear. (It is obviously difficult to get antiseptic to penetrate to the bottom of such a puncture.)[24] First aid may also involve the application of an ice pack to control inflammation, the application of aloe vera to soothe, and if serious symptoms appear, prompt medical care.

In the case of bites by widow spiders, Australian venomous funnel-web spiders, or Brazilian wandering spiders, prompt medical attention should be sought; in some cases the bites of these spiders may develop into a medical emergency. Medical attention should also be sought if a severe allergic reaction occurs.

Necrotic bites

There is no established treatment for necrosis. Routine treatment should include elevation and immobilization of the affected limb, application of ice, local wound care, and tetanus prophylaxis. Many other therapies have been used with varying degrees of success including hyperbaric oxygen, dapsone, antihistamines (e.g., cyproheptadine), antibiotics, dextran, glucocorticoids, vasodilators, heparin, nitroglycerin, electric shock, curettage, surgical excision, and antivenom. None of these treatments have been subjected to controlled, randomized trials to conclusively show benefit. In almost all cases, bites are self-limited and typically heal without any medical intervention.[4]

Occasionally, infections of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are misdiagnosed as necrotic spider bites; this can have severe consequences as a MRSA infection is frequently a medical emergency.[25]

Specific treatments

Some specific courses of treatment may be indicated to deal with severe symptoms:

  • Dapsone is commonly used in the USA and Brazil for the treatment of necrosis. There have been conflicting reports about its efficacy and some have suggested it should no longer be used routinely, if at all.[26]
  • Wound infection is rare. Antibiotics are not recommended unless there is a credible diagnosis of infection.[27]
  • Studies have shown surgical intervention is ineffective and may worsen outcome. Excision may delay wound healing, cause abscesses, and lead to objectional scarring.[28]
  • Anecdotal evidence suggests that application of nitroglycerin patches may be effective in treating recluse bites.[29] Recluse venom is a vasoconstrictor, and nitroglycerin causes vasodilation, allowing the venom to be diluted into the bloodstream, and fresh blood to flow to the wound. Theoretically this prevents necrosis, as vasoconstriction may contribute to necrosis. However, one scientific animal study found no benefit in preventing necrosis, with results showing it increased inflammation and it caused symptoms of systemic envenoming. The authors concluded the results of the study did not support the use of topical nitroglycerin in brown recluse envenoming.[30]
  • Use of antivenom for severe spider bites is frequently indicated, especially in the case of neurotoxic venoms.[31] Effective antivenoms exist for Latrodectus, Atrax, and Phoneutria venom. Recluse bites are now treatable by antivenom; an antivenom for Loxosceles bites is now available in South America, and it appears antivenom may be the most promising therapy. However, the recluse antivenom is most effective if given early, and because of the relatively painless bite delivered by recluses, patients do not often present until 24 or more hours after the event, possibly limiting the effect of this intervention.[32] Due to the risk of serum sickness, use of antivenom is generally not indicated unless serious symptoms are present, and/or the patient fails to respond to other forms of treatment.

Types of spiders with medically significant venom

Spiders having medically significant venom exist in almost all parts of the world except those that are coldest. There is general agreement on which spiders give bites that may produce lasting damage or death, but not such general agreement on how one might sort spiders identified by genus and species in order of their threat to humans.

The following types of spider are known to have medically significant bites, with symptoms ranging from localized pain all the way to severe tissue destruction and potential death. Spiders whose bites have caused fatalities which are well documented in the scientific literature are so indicated in the section headers. Only four genera (Phoneutria, Atrax, Latrodectus, and Loxosceles) are known to have killed humans; three other genera (Hadronyche, Missulena, and Sicarius) possess venom which toxicology studies have shown have lethal potential (being similar to Atrax and Loxosceles venom in composition). There are suspected but unconfirmed deaths reported in the literature from species in Tegenaria and Haplopelma.

Brazilian wandering spiders (Phoneutria--confirmed deaths)

Brazilian wandering spider (Phoneutria nigriventer).

The Brazilian wandering spider (a ctenid spider) is a large, brown spider rather like a North American Wolf spider in appearance. However, it has a highly toxic venom (one of the most neurologically active), and is regarded (along with the Australian funnel-web spiders) as among the most dangerous spiders in the world.[33] It, like several other harmless spiders, may hitch a ride in clusters of bananas. As a result, any large spider in a bunch of bananas should be treated with care. Oddly, many of the bites of this species are alleged to be dry bites (in which no venom is released) but, because of the margin of error when identifying the precise species involved (even assuming the spider body is saved or captured), this claim is not definitive. The bite is at minimum mechanically painful due to the large size of the chelicerae (fangs), and the high levels of serotonin contained in the venom, and can be one of the most excruciating of all spider envenomations. The spiders are as large as some small tarantulas and have fairly long fangs. While the venom can be deadly, no human deaths from bites have been recorded since the development of an antivenom in 2004.[citation needed] Nevertheless, any large spider which makes a threat display (raising front legs, rearing back to display fangs) when encountered should be treated with caution - especially in areas where this type of spider may be present.

This spider's venom has also been found to cause increased levels of nitric oxide which, in male human victims, will result in an involuntary erection that can be very painful and last hours. Scientists are reportedly attempting to create an erectile dysfunction treatment that can be combined with other medicines out of the peptide that causes this reaction.[34]

Australian funnel-web spiders (Atrax, Hadronyche--confirmed deaths)

Threat display by a Sydney funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus).

The Australian funnel-web spiders, such as the Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus (a mygalomorph only distantly related to the araneomorph funnel-web spiders) are regarded as among the most dangerous in the world. They react vigorously to threats and, reputedly, will more often attempt to bite than run away. A. robustus, a large black spider, is found within a radius of about 100 km from Sydney. Its venom contains a compound known as atraxotoxin which is highly toxic to primates. Unlike the Brazilian wandering spider, which is alleged to occasionally deliver dry bites, these spiders typically deliver a full envenomation when they bite.[citation needed]

Range of the two genera (Hadronyche and Atrax) of venomous Australian funnel-web spiders

A. robustus is one of three designated species of the genus Atrax.[35][36] The related genus Hadronyche is represented by about 40 other dangerous species in eastern Australia, including Queensland and Tasmania. The males in this case have somewhat more potent venom than females and they also wander, making them more likely to be encountered in summer. Bites by males of two large species, the Sydney funnel-web and northern tree funnel-web, have resulted in death.[37]

One other genus in the Hexathelidae family has been reported to cause severe symptoms in humans. The genus Macrothele in Taiwan has been attributed to severe bites, but no fatalities.[38]

Tangle-web spiders (Theridiidae)

Two genera of the tangle web spiders have venom which is known to be medically significant. One genus, the widow spiders of genus Latrodectus, has caused more human fatalities than any other. The other genus, the false widow spiders of Steatoda, has a far less serious bite.

Widow spiders (Latrodectus--confirmed deaths)

Latrodectus hasselti, the Redback spider

The widow spiders (genus Latrodectus), such as the black widow, redback spider, and katipo are spiders that carry a neurotoxic venom[39] which can cause a set of symptoms known as Latrodectism. Like many spiders, widows have very poor vision, and they move with difficulty when not on their web. Widow spiders are large, strong-looking house spiders (but still have relatively spindly legs and deep, globular abdomens). The abdomen is dark and shiny, and has one or several red spots, either above or below. The spots may take the form of an hourglass, or two triangles, point-to-point. Male widows, like most spider species, are much smaller than the females and may have a variety of streaks and spots on a browner, less globular abdomen. The males are generally less dangerous than the females of the same species. Widows tend to be non-aggressive, but will bite if the web is disturbed and the spider feels threatened. The venom, while seldom life-threatening, produces very painful effects including muscle spasms and 'tetanus-like' contractions. A serious bite will often require a short hospital stay. Children, elderly, and ill individuals are at most risk of serious effects.

False black widows (Steatoda)

Steatoda bipunctata

The False black widow spiders (also known as false katipo, false button spider, cupboard spider, and in Australia, brown house spider) are spiders of the genus Steatoda. They resemble widow spiders in size and physical form, which is not surprising since they are members of the same family. While the bite of Steatoda spiders are nowhere near as serious as that of true widow spiders, several of these spiders do have medically significant bites. The bite of Steatoda grossa, commonly known as the cupboard spider, is known to cause symptoms which have been described as a very minor widow bite; the medical community now refers to the symptoms of Steatoda bites as steatodism. Other spiders in this genus known to be problem biters include two chiefly European varieties, S. paykulliana and S. nobilis, and a species found mainly in New Zealand and South Africa, S. capensis

Use of widow spider antivenom has been shown effective in treating steatodism.[40] The genera Steatoda and Latrodectus are biologically close cousins; both belong to the family Theridiidae. There are over 100 species in this genus, but only several species have been associated with medically significant bites.

Members of this genus are characterized by the "D" shape of the cephalothorax, and the way the relatively straight line thus formed is mirrored by the blunt forward surface of the abdomen.They look something like this: Ə Other genera in this family generally have cephalothoraxes that are more oval in shape or even rather round, and that give the appearance of two body parts that are joined by a small connector.

Sicariidae spiders

The family Sicariidae includes two genera which inflict necrotoxic bites. One genus, Loxosceles, comprises the recluse spiders (below). The other genus, Sicarius is found only in the southern hemisphere, an example being the Six-eyed sand spider, Sicarius hahni

Six-eyed sand spiders

File:Six-eyed sand spider 4.jpg
The Six-eyed sand spider, Sicarius hahni

The six-eyed sand spider, of southern Africa and others of the genus Sicarius inject a cytotoxic venom, believed to contain sphingomyelinase D,[citation needed] for which there is currently no antivenom. Fortunately, this specimen rarely interacts with humans, and is seldom known to bite; A cousin of the recluse spider (and possessing the same toxic compound as found in recluse venom), this spider buries itself in the sand and strikes from ambush at prey that wanders too closely. Sand particles adhere to cuticles on its abdomen, thus acting as a natural camouflage if uncovered. If disturbed, it will run a short distance and bury itself again.

Recluse spiders (Loxosceles--confirmed deaths)

Brown recluse

Recluse spiders (Loxosceles spp.), such as the brown recluse spider, also known as "violin spiders" or "fiddlers" from the dark violin-shaped marking on the cephalothorax, are slow-moving, retiring spiders which wander about in dim areas and under things, and so are more easily trapped against one's skin by clothing, bed sheets, etc. The spiders will often creep along at a very slow pace and then make a sudden dart for a couple of inches, then return to the previous languid pace. Recluses are extremely venomous. Most encounters with this spider occur from moving boxes or rooting about in closets or under beds. The range of the brown recluse, L. reclusa in the US is approximately the southern two-thirds by the eastern three-quarters of the country. A number of related recluse spiders (some non-native introductions) are found in southern California and nearby areas.

Most recluse spider bites are minor with little or no necrosis. However, a small number of bites produce severe dermonecrotic lesions, and, sometimes, severe systemic symptoms, including organ damage. Rarely the bite may also produce the systemic condition with occasional fatalities.

A minority of bites form a necrotizing ulcer that destroys soft tissue and may take months and, on very rare occasions, years to heal, leaving deep scars similar to MRSA. The damaged tissue will become gangrenous and eventually slough away. The initial bite frequently cannot be felt and there may be no pain, but over time the wound may grow to as large as 10 inches (25 cm) in extreme cases. Bites usually become painful and itchy within 2 to 8 hours, pain and other local effects worsen 12 to 36 hours after the bite with the necrosis developing over the next few days.[17]

Serious systemic effects may occur before this time, as the venom spreads throughout the body in minutes. Mild symptoms include nausea, vomiting, fever, rashes, and muscle and joint pain. Rarely more severe symptoms occur including hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.[18] Debilitated patients, the elderly, and children may be more susceptible to systemic loxoscelism. Deaths have been reported for both the brown recluse and the related South American species L. laeta and L. intermedia.[citation needed]

Even more dangerous is the Chilean recluse, a species native to South America and found in many parts of the world, including in southern California and other southwestern states. Bites of this spider have been known to cause systemic reactions in 15% of reported cases, and fatalities in 3-4% of cases. [41]

Mouse spiders (Missulena)

Mouse spider

The mouse spiders of the genus Missulena are a type of primitive burrowing spider found primarily in Australia. Several species of this genus are known to possess a venom which contains compounds similar to atraxotoxin, the substance in funnel-web venom which is deadly to humans, and there have been several recorded bites by this spider producing severe symptoms requiring emergency medical treatment. However, unlike the funnel-web spiders, which have resulted in at least 13 deaths in the last 100 years,[42] there are no recorded human fatalities due to mouse spider bites, and many bites by this spider result in no serious complications. It is suspected that unlike Atrax and Hadronyche, which typically deliver full envenomations when they bite, that mouse spiders often give "dry" bites. When severe envenomation does occur, funnel-web antivenom has been shown to be effective.[43]

Tarantulas (Theraphosidae)

The tarantulas of the family Theraphosidae are fearsome-looking spiders with (sometimes justified) reputations for inflicting harm. As large spiders, they have very powerful fangs and are capable of delivering a sizable quantity of venom. However, many tarantula species are known to be relatively harmless to humans.

New-world tarantulas

Mexican Red Knee tarantula (Brachypelma sp), a new-world species

New-world tarantulas—those indigenous to the Americas—have bites that generally pose little threat to humans (other than causing localized pain). The primary defense deployed by these spiders is by means of urticating hairs, which can cause irritant symptoms in humans.

Old-world tarantulas

Cobalt blue tarantula (Haplopelma lividum), an old-world species

Old-world tarantulas, especially those indigenous to Asia, lack urticating hairs and use biting as a defensive mechanism as well for subduing prey. They are far less docile than new-world tarantulas, and are more likely to bite when provoked. Incomplete studies of old-world tarantula venoms, as well as anecdotal evidence, suggests that they are more potent than those of new-world counterparts.[citation needed]

There have been report of significant bites by Poecilotheria species, occasionally resulting in hospitalization. Symptoms include localized pain and swelling, exhaustion, moderate to severe muscle cramping, labored breathing and fever, sometimes delayed days after the initial bite.[44][45][46][47]

One species whose venom has been studied extensively is the Chinese bird spider (Haplopelma spp.), a tarantula of the subfamily Ornithoctoninae. The venom has been found to contain numerous novel toxins, is effective at killing mice, and has been blamed for at least one fatality in China. However, there is little documented clinical evidence of the effects of this spiders' bite in humans; so firm conclusions about the level of danger posed by this spider cannot be drawn.

Yellow Sac spiders (Chiracanthum)

Yellow Sac spider Cheiracanthium punctorium

The Yellow Sac spiders, Chiracanthum sp., take shelter in silk tubes during the daytime and generally come out to hunt at night. These pale yellow or whitish spiders are often found in houses at the top of walls, or wandering across ceilings. They are also commonly found outdoors on foliage. The draglines they leave while hunting are one of the most common "spiderwebs" that are removed with broom and vacuum cleaner. People may unintentionally make contact with them in the dark and so be bitten if the spider is irritated or provoked. However, many people will live their entire lives in close proximity to them and never suffer a bite. Nevertheless, the spider's bite is considered toxic.

Huntsman spiders (Heteropoda)

Huntsman spider (Heteropoda venatoria) eating a cricket

The Huntsman spiders have a worldwide reputation for scaring people. They are large, defend their nests, and may move toward people and make threat displays. They frequently enter houses and hunt over the walls and ceilings where they may run rapidly for long distances without pausing. When they actually do bite people, the bites are very unpleasant, but these spiders are not regarded as dangerous. They are quite common in parts of Australia. Australian huntsman spiders are typically non-aggressive except when defending their nests or their young babies.

There is one spider in California and Japan, probably a huntsman (tentatively identified as a member of the Sparassidae family, Heteropoda venatoria), which might run over and bite your finger if you touch the wall that it is clambering over.[citation needed] That behavior may well occur because its eyesight is good enough to see movement and general shape, but not sufficient to avoid mistaking something else for its natural prey. In general, however, members of this genus scramble wildly to escape when they become aware of a human moving into their vicinity.

Redback jumping spiders (Phidippus johnsoni)

Female Phidippus johnsoni (?) 14 mm

Some people have reported being bitten by redback jumping spiders, one of the most visually prominent species among the genus Phidippus. Many reports come from California, although their range is much wider, and people elsewhere may have unpleasant contacts with them. These relatively large, alert but slow-moving jumping spiders have bright red abdomens (the females have a black stripe), and should be clearly visible. It is unclear how bites to humans occur. Accidental contact seems rather unlikely since jumping spiders have excellent vision and can easily avoid being brushed by a human hand. It is also unlikely that they would mistake a human finger for their natural prey. One source suggests that, since they are quite attractive, children may try to pick them up and in that way elicit a defensive bite. Since these spiders are quite large, their body length being around 12 mm (1/2 inch), the volume of their available venom is accordingly rather large. Fortunately, however, the worst consequences reported have been three to four days of discomfort, with no permanent damage. Like most of the larger spiders, the consequences of a bite seem little different from those of a wasp or bee sting. Since they do not frequent human habitations it should ordinarily be easy to avoid unpleasant contact with them. Even when encountered, the ability of jumping spider to detect and track human movement should prevent most potential bite situations.

Comparative analysis

It is often asked which type of spider is the most "dangerous" in the world. There isn't a simple answer to this question, as there are many things which must be taken into account when considering the amount of danger posed by spider bites:

  • Firstly, it is often the case that a spider bite is "dry" – the skin may be pierced, but little or no venom is injected into the victim. In such an instance, little or none of the spider's dangerous potential for harm is manifested.
  • Secondly, there have been reports of spider bites (by spiders considered otherwise harmless) causing allergic reactions in some individuals, up to and including anaphylactic shock, a life-threatening condition (much the same as a sting from an ant, bee, or wasp may produce a harmful effect apart from the toxic quality of its venom).[48]
  • Thirdly, many spiders listed as dangerous are seldom encountered, or have dispositions that make them unlikely to bite despite the high toxicity of their venom.
  • Finally, little is known about the toxicity of many spiders, due to their infrequent encounters with humans; the list of venomous spiders is limited to those that are linked to medical events in humans or who otherwise have been extensively studied.

It should also be noted that, for healthy adults, a bite by even the most toxic spiders on the list may require hours before death ensues; if timely appropriate emergency medical treatment is administered, victims may be expected to recover. The scenario given in movies such as Arachnophobia, where bite victims die within minutes, does not occur. One exception to this picture occurs because in the case of very small children the amount of venom dispersed throughout the body is many times the concentration in an adult. There is at least one recorded case of a small child dying within 15 minutes of a bite from a Sydney funnel-web spider; that event occurred before the development of an antivenom. Since the antivenom was developed there have been no fatalities due to this species.

The spider-bites documented as the most dangerous to humans are those of the Sydney funnel-web spider and the Brazilian wandering spider. These spiders are potentially more dangerous than widow spiders because they have longer fangs and can inject greater quantities of venom to greater depths. Phoneutria nigriventer has approximately 2 mg of venom, but frequently gives dry bites or at least does not deliver all of its available venom. Atrax robustus has approximately 1.7 mg of venom. Bites of Six-eyed sand spiders have been described as dangerous to humans, but there is a lack of proof for this,[49]: p.25  though Sicarius venom has been shown to be fatal to rabbits.

The genus Latrodectus (of which the black widow spider is the most notorious) have been credited with killing more people per year, worldwide, than any other spider. Because they are not very large, they are much harder to detect than a large Brazilian wandering spider or a tarantula. Their venom is extremely potent. Compared to many other species of spiders, their chelicerae are not very large. In the case of a mature female, the hollow, needle shaped part of each chelicera, the part that penetrates the skin, is approximately 1 mm (0.04 in) long, sufficiently long to inject the venom to a dangerous depth. The males, being much smaller, can inject far less venom and inject it far less deeply. The actual amount injected, even by a mature female, is very small in physical volume (.02–.03 mg). When this small amount of venom is diffused throughout the body of a healthy, mature human, it usually does not amount to a fatal dose. Deaths in healthy adults from Latrodectus bites are rare in terms of the number of bites per thousand people. Only sixty-three deaths were reported in the United States between 1950 and 1989 (Miller, 1992). On the other hand, the geographical range of the widow spiders is very great. As a result, far more people are exposed, worldwide, to widow bites than are exposed to bites of more dangerous spiders, so the highest number of deaths worldwide are caused by members of the genus Latrodectus. Widow spiders have more potent venom than most spiders, and prior to the development of antivenom, 5% of bites resulted in fatalities, although comparable figures are not available for the other species.[50]

Measurements

The LD-50 figures have limited utility since the effects of venoms differ widely from species to species. Before an antivenom was developed, deaths from Atrax and Hadronyche were very common. Some deaths from Phoneutria bites are reported, but much of their range is in the Amazon so reporting of bites may not be very complete.

Most LD-50 figures are based on experiments with laboratory mice. There are great differences in the sensitivities of various kinds of organisms to various kinds of venom. The relative sensitivities of mice to various venoms may not allow prediction of the exact degree of human sensitivity. So most of these figures can only give a rough approximation of the medical consequences of various spider bites to humans. Nevertheless, any venom capable of killing other organisms in small doses should be avoided by humans. A case in point are the Sicarius spp. The venom of these spiders is extremely active in laboratory animals, but there are few if any documented reports of Sicarius bites in humans.

Genus Species Common name Body length Venom amount LD-50 Alternate LD-50 Deaths reported
Atrax robustus Venomous funnel-web 24–32 mm. [48] 0.25 mg (F) and 0.81 mg (M) [51] 2 mg [52] .16 mg/kg [53] unknown 1927–1980 13 deaths
Hadronyche species Venomous funnel-web 24–32 mm. [48] 0.25 mg (F) and 0.81 mg (M) [51] 2 mg [52] .16 mg/kg [53]
Latrodectus mactans Black widow 8–15 mm [48] 0.02–.03 mg. [54][55] 0.002 mg/kg [54]* 0.9 mg/kg 5% of reported bites prior to antivenom availability [48]
Latrodectus tredecimguttatus Malmignatte (approx. same) (approx. same) 0.68 μg/kg [56] 16.25 μg/kg [56]
Loxosceles reclusa Brown recluse 1.2 cm (0.75 in) [48] 6–10 mm [48] .13–.27 mg. [56][57] (rare) [48]
Loxosceles intermedia 0.48 mg/kg [58] unknown
Loxosceles laeta Chilean recluse 1.45 mg/kg [58]
Loxosceles gaucho 0.74 mg/kg [58]
Phoneutria bahiensis Brazilian wandering spider 30 mm 1.079 mg [59] .00061–.00157 mg/kg [59]
Phoneutria boliviensis Brazilian wandering spider 30 mm 1.079 mg. [59] .00061–.00157 mg/kg [59]
Phoneutria fera Brazilian wandering spider 30 mm [48] 1.079 mg [59] .00061–.00157 mg/kg [59] occasional deaths even after antivenin treatment[48]
Phoneutria nigriventer Brazilian wandering spider 3–5 cm (1.25–2 in) [60] 2.15 mg [57] 1.079 mg. [59] 15.20 ng/mg [57] .00061–.00157 mg/kg [59] 200 µg/kg (0.2 ng/mg) [57]
Phoneutria reidyi Brazilian wandering spider 30 mm .00061–.00157 mg/kg [59] 0.3 mg/kg
Sicarius (Africa & S.A. species) Six-eyed sand spider 17 mm
Haplopelma huwenum (previously Selenocosmia huwena) Chinese bird spider 0.70 mg/kg [61] One infant death reported. [62]
Poecilotheria ornata Fringed ornamental tarantula Instances of coma reported. [62]
Poecilotheria fasciata ** Sri Lankan ornamental tarantula Instances of cardiac failure reported [62]
Cheiracanthium species Yellow Sac spider 6–10 mm (No severe consequences) [48]
Cheiracanthium japonicum Japanese sac 6–10 mm
Macrothele holsti, gigas, taiwanensis [55] Primitive burrowing spiders No deaths reported in Taiwan.[38]
Steatoda grossa Cupboard spider Mild widow-like symptoms reported, no severe consequences

* This value is based on experience with human exposures.
** Several other kinds of tarantulas in the pet trade are regarded as giving non-trivial bites. Tarantulas are typically far larger than spiders with the most toxic kinds of venom. However, the sheer volume of the venom may compensate for its lesser toxicity. The effects of a full envenomation are probably unknown for many species of tarantulas, so due caution is advisable.

Spiders and similar creatures with unsupported reputations

There are several species of spider (and a few other arachnids which are not spiders, but are frequently confused with them), who have had unsupported reputations for being harmful to humans. In some cases, that the species is now considered harmless is a settled matter for arachnologists and other professionals; in other cases (such as the hobo spider), prior scientific belief that a spider is harmful to humans is now being questioned.

Hobo spiders (Tegenaria agrestis)

Male Hobo Spider - note the large pedipalps

The hobo spider, Tegenaria agrestis, may wander away from its web, especially in the fall, and thus come into contact with people and potentially bite. This spider is found in the northwestern United States, western Canada and throughout much of Europe. Studies performed by arachnologist Darwin Vest reported that this spider's venom caused significant necrotic effects in laboratory animals[63][64], and medical authorities in the Pacific Northwest have blamed this spider for at least one fatality. Many agricultural authorities have published the advice that this species is potentially harmful, and medical personnel in the western United States and Canada have been advised to consider hobo spider bites when patients present with necrotic wounds. Many brown recluse bites have been reported in the U.S. west coast states (Washington, Oregon, and northern California) where populations of brown recluse spiders have not been found; some of these alleged bites have been attributed to hobo spiders instead.[23]

However, in Europe, where the spider originates, the species is considered a harmless outdoor relative of the common house spider (Tegenaria domestica), and no other spider in the genus Tegenaria is considered to be harmful to people. Attempts to replicate Vest's study that reported necrotic effects of the venom have failed, thus casting the "dangerous" status of this spider into doubt. In addition, Vest's methodologies have been questioned; he has been accused of incorrectly attributing symptoms to hobo spider bites when no positive identification of the spider was made. The one fatality attributed to the spider by medical authorities has also been questioned, and there are no documented cases where an otherwise-healthy person has developed a necrotic lesion from a positively-identified hobo spider bite. Many scientists now question whether or not the spider is harmful at all. [65][66]

Lycosa tarantula

Lycosa tarantula. Its back is covered with recently hatched spiderlings.

Lycosa tarantula, a species of wolf spider which is found near Taranto, Italy, Serbia, Montenegro (and the origin of the name tarantula, which today refers to a completely different kind of spider), was once blamed for a condition known as tarantism. Workers in the fields would suffer bites, and observe large, conspicuous, hairy spiders in the area. That spider, L. tarantula, was blamed for the pain and suffering (and occasional death) associated with tarantism. It is known that the bite of L. tarantula, while sometimes painful, has no serious medical consequences for humans. It is also suspected that the real culprit was another spider, Latrodectus tredecimguttatus, a type of widow spider, and one which is now known to be very dangerous to people.

White-tailed spiders

White-tailed spiders (Lampona spp.), indigenous to Australia and present as an invasive pest in New Zealand, have been blamed for a necrotic bite, producing symptoms similar to a brown recluse. However, a scientific study published in 2003 showed that their bites produce pain equivalent to a bee sting, a red mark, local swelling and itchiness; very occasionally nausea, vomiting, malaise or headache may occur. The study of 130 white-tailed spider bites found no necrotic ulcers or confirmed infections.[21]

Harvestman ('daddy-long-legs')

Opiliones (harvestman)

The spider-like arachnids known as Opiliones (also known as "harvestmen" or "daddy-long-legs"), are a species often handled by humans. They are the subject of an urban legend which not only claims that Harvestmen are venomous, but are in fact more venomous than any of the spiders but are incapable of biting humans due to their lack of penetration. This is untrue on several counts. None of the known species have venom glands or fangs, instead having chelicerae.[67] In addition, incidents of opiliones biting people are rare, and no reported bites by these species have had any lasting effects.

The term "daddy-long-legs" also can refer to the similar-looking cellar spider. This species (a true spider) can bite humans, but its venom is not known to have any effects beyond mild discomfort at the site of the bite.

Sun spiders

The arachnids of the order Solifugae, also known as wind scorpions or sun spiders, are neither spiders nor scorpions. In the Middle East, it is common belief among some American soldiers stationed there that Solifugae will feed on living human flesh. The story goes that the creature will inject some anesthetizing venom into the exposed skin of its sleeping victim, then feed voraciously, leaving the victim to awaken with a gaping wound. Solifugae, however, do not produce such an anesthetic, and do not attack prey larger than themselves unless threatened.

Further, Solifugae are known to not possess any venom (other than one species in India, which may possess venom according to one study [68]). However, due to the large size of their jaws, bites by Solifugae can cause significant wounds, which should be treated accordingly to avoid infection.[6]

References

  1. ^ "Spider Bite First Aid". firstaidkits.org. Retrieved 2007-08-23.
  2. ^ a b Diaz, James H (2004). "The global epidemiology, syndromic classification, management, and prevention of spider bites". American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 71 (2): 239–250. PMID 15306718. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. ^ Vetter, R.S. (2008) Spiders of the genus Loxosceles (Araneae, Sicariidae): a review of biological, medical and psychological aspects regarding envenomations. The Journal of Arachnology 36:150–163
  4. ^ a b Swanson D, Vetter R (2005). "Bites of brown recluse spiders and suspected necrotic arachnidism". N Engl J Med. 352 (7): 700–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMra041184. PMID 15716564. Cite error: The named reference "NEJM2005-Vetter" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ Rigby, Rhymer (2003-09-23). "Tuck in to a tarantula". Sunday Telegraph.
  6. ^ a b Punzo, Fred (1998). The Biology of Camel-Spiders. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  7. ^ Escoubas P, Rash L (2004). "Tarantulas: eight-legged pharmacists and combinatorial chemists". Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 43 (5): 555–74. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.02.007. PMID 15066413. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  8. ^ Escoubas P (2006). "Molecular diversification in spider venoms: a web of combinatorial peptide libraries". Molecular Diversity. 10 (4): 545–54. doi:10.1007/s11030-006-9050-4. PMID 17096075. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. ^ Jiang L, Peng L, Chen J, Zhang Y, Xiong X, Liang S (2008). "Molecular diversification based on analysis of expressed sequence tags from the venom glands of the Chinese bird spider Ornithoctonus huwena". Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 51 (8): 1479–89. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.03.024. PMID 18482741. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Marcus V. Gomez, Evanguedes Kalapothakis, Cristina Guatimosim, 2 and Marco A. M. Prado. "Phoneutria nigriventer Venom: A Cocktail of Toxins That Affect Ion Channels". Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 22 (5–6).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Senff-Ribeiro A, Henrique da Silva P, Chaim OM, Gremski LH, Paludo KS, Bertoni da Silveira R, Gremski W, Mangili OC, Veiga SS (2008). "Biotechnological applications of brown spider (Loxosceles genus) venom toxins". Biotechnology Advances. 26 (3): 210–8. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.003. PMID 18207690.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Binford GJ, Bodner MR, Cordes MH, Baldwin KL, Rynerson MR, Burns SN, Zobel-Thropp PA (2009). "Molecular evolution, functional variation, and proposed nomenclature of the gene family that includes sphingomyelinase D in sicariid spider venoms". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 26 (3): 547–66. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn274. PMID 19042943. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Binford GJ, Cordes MH, Wells MA (2005). "Sphingomyelinase D from venoms of Loxosceles spiders: evolutionary insights from cDNA sequences and gene structure". Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 45 (5): 547–60. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.11.011. PMID 15777950. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Cordes MH, Binford GJ (2006). "Lateral gene transfer of a dermonecrotic toxin between spiders and bacteria". Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 22 (3): 264–8. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti811. PMID 16332712. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. ^ Greta J. Binford and Michael A. Wells (2003). "The phylogenetic distribution of sphingomyelinase D activity in venoms of Haplogyne spiders" (pdf). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B. 135: 25–33.
  16. ^ Schenone H, Saavedra T, Rojas A, Villarroel F. (1989). "Loxoscelism in Chile. Epidemiologic, clinical and experimental studies". Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 31: 403–415.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b Wasserman G, Anderson P (1983–1984). "Loxoscelism and necrotic arachnidism". J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 21 (4–5): 451–72. PMID 6381752. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  18. ^ a b Wasserman G (2005). "Bites of the brown recluse spider". N Engl J Med. 352 (19): 2029–30, author reply 2029–30. doi:10.1056/NEJM200505123521922. PMID 15892198.
  19. ^ Bennett, R. G. and R. S. Vetter. (2004). "An approach to spider bites: erroneous attribution of dermonecrotic lesions to brown recluse and hobo spider bites in Canada". Canadian Fam Physician. 50: 1098–1101.
  20. ^ James H. Diaz, MD (2005). "Most necrotic ulcers are not spider bites". American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 72 (4): 364–367. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  21. ^ a b Isbister GK, Gray MR. "White-tail spider bite: a prospective study of 130 definite bites by Lampona species". Medical Journal of Australia. 179 (4): 199–202.
  22. ^ Isbister GK, Hirst D (2003-08). "A prospective study of definite bites by spiders of the family Sparassidae (huntsmen spiders) with identification to species level". Toxicon (abstract). 42 (2): 163–71. doi:10.1016/S0041-0101(03)00129-6. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ a b Vetter, R. S. (2000). Myth: Idiopathic wounds are often due to brown recluse or other spider bites throughout the United States. Western Journal of Medicine 173:357-358
  24. ^ Wilkerson, James A., M.D. (1967). Medicine for Mountaineering, Seattle. p. 50
  25. ^ Peggy Peck (2004). "If the patient says spider bite, think [[MRSA]], says Assembly speaker". American Academy of Family Physicians. Retrieved 2007-10-11. {{cite web}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  26. ^ Bryant S, Pittman L (2003). "Dapsone use in Loxosceles reclusa envenomation: is there an indication?". Am J Emerg Med. 21 (1): 89–90. doi:10.1053/ajem.2003.50021. PMID 12563594.
  27. ^ Anderson P (1998). "Missouri brown recluse spider: a review and update". Mo Med. 95 (7): 318–22. PMID 9666677.
  28. ^ Rees R, Altenbern D, Lynch J, King L (1985). "Brown recluse spider bites. A comparison of early surgical excision versus dapsone and delayed surgical excision". Ann Surg. 202 (5): 659–63. PMID 4051613.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ Burton K. "The Brown Recluse Spider: Finally stopped in its tracks". Retrieved 2006-09-02.
  30. ^ Lowry B, Bradfield J, Carroll R, Brewer K, Meggs W (2001). "A controlled trial of topical nitroglycerin in a New Zealand white rabbit model of brown recluse spider envenomation". Ann Emerg Med. 37 (2): 161–5. doi:10.1067/mem.2001.113031. PMID 11174233.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Espino-Solis GP, Riaño-Umbarila L, Becerril B, Possani LD (2009). "Antidotes against venomous animals: state of the art and prospectives". Journal of Proteomics. 72 (2): 183–99. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.020. PMID 19457345. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ Isbister G, Graudins A, White J, Warrell D (2003). "Antivenom treatment in arachnidism". J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 41 (3): 291–300. doi:10.1081/CLT-120021114. PMID 12807312.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ Costa SK, Brain SD, Antunes E, De Nucci G, Docherty RJ (2003). "Phoneutria nigriventer spider venom activates 5-HT4 receptors in rat-isolated vagus nerve". Br. J. Pharmacol. 139 (1): 59–64. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705240. PMC 1573833. PMID 12746223. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Brazil Spider Offers Hope for Those Suffering from Erectile Dysfunction on Bio-Medicine website
  35. ^ Gray M R and Sutherland S K, cited by Meier J and White J in Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons (The other two species are A. infestus and A. formidabilis.)
  36. ^ Platnick N I, Merrett P and Brignoli P M Advances in spider taxonomy, 1981-1987 p. 75
  37. ^ Fact sheet: Funnel-web spider CSIRO
  38. ^ a b Hung, Shin-Wen and Wong, Tzong-Leun. "Arachnid Envenomation in Taiwan" (PDF). Ann. Disaster Med. 3 Suppl. 1: S12–S17.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. ^ Jone SC. "Ohio State University Fact Sheet: Black Widow Spider". Ohio State University. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
  40. ^ Graudins A, Gunja N, Broady K, Nicholson G (2002). "Clinical and in vitro evidence for the efficacy of Australian redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) antivenom in the treatment of envenomation by a Cupboard spider (Steatoda grossa)". Toxicon. 40 (6): 767–75. doi:10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00280-X. PMID 12175614.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  41. ^ Schenone H, Saavedra T, Rojas A, Villarroel F. (1989). "Loxoscelism in Chile. Epidemiologic, clinical and experimental studies". Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 31: 403–415.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ^ Isbister G, Gray M, Balit C, Raven R, Stokes B, Porges K, Tankel A, Turner E, White J, Fisher M (2005). "Funnel-web spider bite: a systematic review of recorded clinical cases". Med J Aust. 182 (8): 407–11. PMID 15850438.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ Ibister GK (2004). "Mouse spider bites (Missulena spp) and their medical importance". Medical Journal of Australia. 180 (5): 225–227.
  44. ^ Gabriel,, R. (2002). "Notes and Observations Regarding the Bite of Poecilotheria pederseni". British Tarantula Society Journal. 17 (2): 61–64.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  45. ^ Poecilotheria metallica - Arachnoboards
  46. ^ Phong's Tarantulas! - Tarantula bites
  47. ^ Schmidt, G. (1988): Wie gefährlich sind Vogelspinnenbisse ? Deutsches Ärzteblatt 85 Heft 28/29(2): 1424-1425. (u. a. Infos about Poecilotheria fasciata)
  48. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Vetter, Richard S. and Visscher, P. Kirk, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA (1998-07). "Bites and Stings of medically important venomous arthropods". International Journal of Dermatology. 37: 481–496. doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00455.x. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  49. ^ Occupational Health Southern Africa March April 2005
  50. ^ Bettini S. "Epidemiology of Latrodectism". Toxicon. 104: 93–102. PMID 14301291.
  51. ^ a b "Atrax Robustus". IPCS INCHEM. International Programme on Chemical Safety. 1989. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  52. ^ a b Sutherland SK, Duncan AW, and Tibballs J. (1980-10-18). "Local inactivation of funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus) venom by first-aid measures: potentially lifesaving part of treatment". Medical Journal of Australia. 2 (8): 435–437.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  53. ^ a b Sheumack DD, Baldo BA, Carroll PR, Hampson F, Howden ME, Skorulis A (1984). "A comparative study of properties and toxic constituents of funnel web spider (Atrax) venoms". Comparative biochemistry and physiology. 78 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1016/0742-8413(84)90048-3.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ a b Stewart, Charles (1998). "Beyond the Road: Environmental Emergencies for Emergency Service Providers" (PDF). Charles Stewart and Associates. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  55. ^ a b http://www.thudiv.com/variety/spider/spider1.htm) (Tung Hai University, Taiwan, article in Chinese broken link)
  56. ^ a b c Ori, Masahisa and Ikeda, Hiroyoshi (1998). "Spider Venoms and Spider Toxins". Journal of Toxicology.Toxin reviews. 17 (3): 405–426.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. ^ a b c d M. F. Manzoli-Palma; N. Gobbi; M. S. Palma (2003). "Insects as biological models to assay spider and scorpion venom toxicity". Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases. 9 (2). doi:10.1590/S1678-91992003000200004.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  58. ^ a b c Barbaro KC, Ferreira ML, Cardoso DF, Eickstedt VR, Mota I (1996-11). "Identification and neutralization of biological activities in the venoms of Loxosceles spiders". Brazilian Journal of Med Biol Res. 29 (11): 1491–7. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  59. ^ a b c d e f g h i Herzig V, John Ward R, Ferreira dos Santos W (2002). "Intersexual variations in the venom of the Brazilian 'armed' spider Phoneutria nigriventer (Keyserling, 1891)". Toxicon. 40 (10): 1399–406. doi:10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00136-8. PMID 12368110.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  60. ^ Lelle Petterson. "The genus Phoneutria, Perty 1833, wandering spiders". Minax tarantulas.
  61. ^ Liang SP, Zhang DY, Pan X, Chen Q, Zhou PA (1993-08). "Properties and amino acid sequence of huwentoxin-I, a neurotoxin purified from the venom of the Chinese bird spider Selenocosmia huwena". Toxicon. 31 (8): 969–78. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(93)90256-I. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  62. ^ a b c http://www.spidertalk.net/SpiderTalk/post.php?action=reply&fid=1&tid=2165&repquote=16279
  63. ^ Vest, D. K. (1987). Envenomation by Tegenaria agrestis (Walckenaer) spiders in rabbits. Toxicon 25(2):221-4.
  64. ^ Vest, D. K. (1987). Necrotic arachnidism in the northwest United States and its probable relationship to Tegenaria agrestis (Walckenaer) spiders. Toxicon 25(2):175-84.
  65. ^ Vetter R, Isbister G (2004). "Do hobo spider bites cause dermonecrotic injuries?". Ann Emerg Med. 44 (6): 605–7. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.03.016. PMID 15573036.
  66. ^ Bennett, R. G. and R. S. Vetter. (2004). An approach to spider bites: erroneous attribution of dermonecrotic lesions to brown recluse and hobo spider bites in Canada. Canadian Fam. Physician 50: 1098-1101.
  67. ^ Answers to commons questions about harvestmen - The Arachnology Home Page. Accessed 2008-04-01
  68. ^ Aruchami, M. & G. Sundara Rajulu (1978). "An investigation on the poison glands and the nature of the venom of Rhagodes nigrocinctus (Solifugae: Arachnida)". Nat. Acad. Sci. Letters (India). 1: 191–192.