Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Lobsteroh (talk | contribs)
77 edits
→‎Johann Huber: new section
Line 427: Line 427:
The article has been deleted because of a copyright issue. Unfortunately, various attempts to get the review to provide me with details, what was actually the issue, did not work. He did not respond. There I would like to get the draft and see, which parts I could delete to avoid the copyright infringement. The article is quite extensive, since a lot of people have been working on it and it would be a pity to loos all the work, because of one picture or sentence. Thank you so much for your help. Kind regards, -[[User:SirJamesHunt|SirJamesHunt]] ([[User talk:SirJamesHunt|talk]]) 11:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The article has been deleted because of a copyright issue. Unfortunately, various attempts to get the review to provide me with details, what was actually the issue, did not work. He did not respond. There I would like to get the draft and see, which parts I could delete to avoid the copyright infringement. The article is quite extensive, since a lot of people have been working on it and it would be a pity to loos all the work, because of one picture or sentence. Thank you so much for your help. Kind regards, -[[User:SirJamesHunt|SirJamesHunt]] ([[User talk:SirJamesHunt|talk]]) 11:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|SirJamesHunt}} '''working on it.''' This is a long draft, and so far I have found only two paragraphs that are direct copies. It should certainly be possible to restore most of it, but it will take a bit of time to check it properly. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|SirJamesHunt}} '''working on it.''' This is a long draft, and so far I have found only two paragraphs that are direct copies. It should certainly be possible to restore most of it, but it will take a bit of time to check it properly. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{ping|JohnCDt}} Thank sooo much! I will then await your feedback. [[User:SirJamesHunt|SirJamesHunt]] ([[User talk:SirJamesHunt|talk]]) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


== Roger Groos ==
== Roger Groos ==

Revision as of 14:55, 13 March 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

nitesh estates limited

Hello, I am intend to work on this page. So, Please allow me to do so. The company is notable enough to appear on Wikipedia and hence I want to work on this page. -182.68.91.108 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • ==Reason== Please give me the reason why can't I work on it and yes why I was blocked? I simple requested to create this page and I know that this page was deleted several number of times as was created against Wikipedia policies but I will create it as per Wikipedia's policy only and will not go beyond it. I will add the content that everyone will willingly read.
  • I agree that the article has been removed number of times. I checked the complete logs of it but on the other hand I feel that the company is notable enough to be present on Wikipedia and hence want to start it from beginning. And yes i really need your help in it. Once I will get the approval from your side, will create this page and its a humble request to please correct it if there is any kind of mistake. Also, if I cannot create this article then I would like to ask you one thing that can't we create this page ever in future? Because if today I have not been allowed then that means in future also nobody will be allowed to work on it? Does it so?

Andy Penn

AP is the new CEO of Telstra a $70b market cap corporation and a top ten telco globally -121.211.251.58 (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. So? Does he have significant coverage in reliable sources?
The article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, making it ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Please discuss it with the deleting administrator Bbb23.  Not done. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@New but motivated: To clarify, Penn may well be notable, but the article did not show why he is notable. Indeed, it had no content at all - just an infobox. If you want the article back, I am sure either Bbb23 or myself would be happy to restore it to draft space where it can be worked on. However, a blank article isn't going to be restored to mainspace. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed Clinical Models

I, William Goossen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ISO TS on Detailed Clinical Models is currently in press at ISO -William Goossen (talk) 09:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@William Goossen: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Detailed Clinical Models. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Bajracharya

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Koiralaindeep (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Bajracharya, a Nepali singer was born on May 2 in Lalitpur, Nepal. He started his musical career in the song Chodi Gayo Priya. Since , he had recorded more than 250 songs and did more than 300 programmes. He also did his first live concert in City Hall (1988) (2045). He too combine with other band for the concert in different countries including Nepal. With 1974AD ICON 2003 at .Ktm And Hong Kong, Rovin & Lujaw And Mongoliyan Heart at Dasrath Stadium. Ktm, with Ram K Dhakal and J Rajani Kant at Japan. He did his major solo concert in Deepak’s Night In Hong Kong (2002), World No Tobacco Day Mega Event live (2003) Presented By NHEICC & WHO at Dasrath Stadium. Ktm, Deepak Bajracharya Live In Patan at Patan Durbar Square, Deepak Bajracharya Live In Unplugged 2004 at Royal Nepal Academy.Ktm, Ma Ra Mero Guitar at Malla Hotel, Deepak Bajrachary Live In Biratnagar (2005). Among 250 songs his famous and hits songs included, Kali Kali Hissi Pareki, Ow Amira, Kati Baschau Maiti Gharma, Ritu, Jhumu Jhumu . He was also the brand ambassador of Bagpiper Whiskey, Kodak Film, Samsung Electronic and World Link Communication. He also awarded with different title award as Best Male Vocal Performance 1999 A.D., Best Music Video Award 2000 A.D, Album of the Year 2003 A.D.and so on.

for more info http://songsnepali.co/biography-of-deepak-bajracharya/

http://singerdeepak.com/

So i would like you to re generate this page again so that i can post all info to this.

Thanks and Regards

Indeep Koirala

@Koiralaindeep:  Not done. This article was deleted after a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Bajracharya, and has been protected against creation because it was repeatedly re-created. I suggest that you make a draft article at Draft:Deepak Bajracharya, with references to show how he meets the WP:Notability criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, and then apply at WP:Deletion review. Check out WP:Your first article for advice, and take care not to write in a promotional tone. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Koiralaindeep: If you do decide to give the article another try in draft space, let me know and I can restore the old version as a starting point for you. Keep in mind that the article will have to be approved by a third party before it can return to mainspace, so make sure Bajracharya meets the notability guidelines (as explained by JohnCD) before starting work or you will just be wasting your time on a hopeless article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alfin Tuasalamony

Article of a footballer who has since gained notability. The article of the individual Alfin Ismail Tuasalamony has already been created, but it would be useful to re-create this article as a redirect since his middle name is sometimes omitted. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Inter&anthro:  Done. Would it better the other way round - by which name is he more usually known? JohnCD (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is a valid point, and I'm not actually sure. I'm going to add @MbahGondrong:, @Rizky Rio:, & @Tommy1933: to this conversation as they are probably are more knowledgeable in the subject area than me. If a clear consensus cannot be immediately reached the discussion will be moved top the articles' talk page. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's a crude measure, but Google returns 150k hits for AT and only 30k for AIT. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I think your logic is correct, although it might be for the best to have another editor's opinion. Inter&anthro (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank for the notice Inter&anthro. As mentioned by JohnCD, he is popularly known as Alfin Tuasalamony and rarely mentioned with his middle name included. This can be seen on his Wikipedia ID page and in almost all football statistic websites (soccerway, transfermarkt, etc). Hopefully that helps. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, article moved to Alfin Tuasalamony, with the other as a redirect. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Awakening: A Star Wars Fan Film

i change the page and took out the copyrighted info. Its a notable star wars fan film. why is the page keep getting deleted. its there something i'm doing wrong that needs to be corrected -Kevin Jones (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Kevin Jones (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwjones30: deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Dark Awakening: A Star Wars Fan Film, and that is where you should comment, but first read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done There is no claim of importance here for a piece of on-line content so it meets the speedy delete criterion. You will have to find reliable independent writings about the film to base an article on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:HYH.124/DYK

subpages of user talk pages are not dependant on the main user subpages. -HYH.124 (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnCD: Could you please undelete the page? HYH.124 (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, I restored it. I can't say I understand why it was deleted in the first place. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that! User:HYH.124/DYK was tagged {{db-u1}}, and I wrongly assumed that meant its talk page, too. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peachy Queen Boutique

I, Gnomeably, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnomeably (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gnomeably: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Peachy Queen Boutique. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K. Krithi Karanth

K. Krithi Karanth is a very prominent conservation biologist , she was a INK Speaker , A national geographic grant winner , A ramanujan fellow, was awarded the 10,000th research grant from National Geographic Society, was named as a rising young women of achievement by Elle Magazine, and has been nominated in the Environment category for the L’Oreal Paris Femina Women Awards 2013. Her information on the page was incomplete i agree but deletion was unwarranted and Schetm agrees with the reasoning. -Chinmayisk 11:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC) --Chinmayisk 11:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinmayisk: checkY restored to draft. The page is now at Draft:K. Krithi Karanth where you can work on it. Wikipedia's inclusion test is called WP:Notability and is not a matter of saying so but of showing references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Please check with the deleting administrator, user Bbb23, before returning this to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: please have a look at the article Draft:K. Krithi Karanth now and let me know if it is ok to include it into the main encyclopedia --Chinmayisk 19:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Chinmayisk: I don't think we're supposed to have this discussion here, but what the hell. I would not delete it per A7 in its current state. That said, don't you think you should clean it up before moving it to main space? It's got formatting errors and unsourced material. As an aside, pinging me doesn't work unless you use standard signing of posts. I just happened to see your edit on my watchlist; I wasn't notified of it. Good luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Leppien Sisters

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) LovegoodMusicians (talk) 15:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LovegoodMusicians:  Not done. This page was a copyright violation from http://leppiensisters.com/about/. Wikipedia cannot hold copyright text, even in draft pages, without a formal copyright release. Assertion of permission is not enough. It is seldom worth making a copyright release, because just copying a website does not make an acceptable article: groups' own web-pages are written in a promotional style unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" are required to establish Wikipedia:Notability, see also WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Reducetarianism

Enter your reducetarianism has now received considerable press - http://www.reducetarian.com/press - and requires a wikipedia page to clarify its meaning. It has been included in other wikipedia pages including semi-vegetarianism, but it differs from it with a focus on eating less meat with respect to individual diets - http://www.reducetarian.com/faq/ here and then click the "Save page" button below -209.92.162.4 (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia has quite a high bar for new words like this - check out WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InfoQuest

Due to miscommunications and change of particular websites it resulted in Deletion of pages, we will rectify those errors and update it -115.241.28.11 (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoQuest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ymblanter (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Browser app

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -70.209.32.92 (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, malformed request. No such article browser app (upper or lowercase) nothing found in requester's deleted contributions. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rotary Cartoon Awards

Do not understand why this page was not accepted for publication and subsequently deleted. Please advise. -Cartoonlover2 (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The AFC request was declined for the following reason: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.". Since no additional edits were made to the page, it was considered abandoned after 6 months and subsequently deleted. If you have reliable sources to use as references, I can restore this page so they can be added and the page can be re-submitted for consideration. Thanks, Nakon 04:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cartoonlover2: - In case it wasn't clear, the page can be restored upon request if you intend to work on it to address the issues raised in the previous AfC review. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Laith Awda Kadhim

I, 37.236.184.81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 37.236.184.81 (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This is a personal CV. Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Godfrey Diamond

Unnecessarily removed -68.174.167.80 (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No such article has ever existed here, either in main space, draft space, or AFC space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If perchance this was typed in by you but refused, then it was stopped by a filter log. If that occurred, you would have to tell us what IP or username you were using when it happened for us to tell you the reason as it was not under your currently assigned IP address. If it was under your current IP address then, as above, the page never existed, so it was never successfully saved by you. In any case, you would need to tell us the specifics of exactly what occurred, what you did, where, under what name, and what happened.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schwartz Center Rounds

I submitted the page for approval but it was deleted due to copyright. I would like the chance to review the page and make the necessary amendments for resubmission. I am writing the article on behalf of the organization who organizes Schwartz Rounds in the UK. The system is now used by over 100 healthcare providers in the UK and recognized as a significant contribution to the culture of the NHS. Please let me know what I need to do to move this submission forwards. Thanks -Goldstar23 (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation.. Copyright violations won't be undeleted. And Wikipedia doesn't host articles "on behalf of" organizations, nor does it approve of editing with a conflict of interest or using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion. I strongly suggest you find something else to write about. BencherliteTalk 22:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lisa E. Bloom

I, TeleComNasSprVen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 23:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BencherliteTalk 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ER. Ajay kr. meena

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -ER. Ajay kr. meena (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This was deleted by User:Bbb23 as WP:A7 and WP:G11, "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and an "article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Because of that, this cannot be restored here. You need to ask Bbb23 if he will restore it and if not, you need to go through deletion review. However at the same time I do have to recommend that you not create an article about yourself since autobiographies are strongly discouraged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Holley

Accidently deleted as abandoned for 6 months no edit Was unable to do it by then "Save page" button below -Austexan (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - page was deleted was a copyright violation of [1]. Feel free to start a new article/draft article using your own words, but Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Correction - the linked page was deleted as a copyright violation, but the draft version at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan Holley was deleted as abandoned, as you say. I have restored the draft version. Please work on it ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra the Barefoot Girl

I believe my article was deleted unfairly. All of my sources of information were listed. Sierra the Barefoot Girl is a prominent figure in the barefoot community and is one of the biggest advocates for barefoot freedom and rights. Please reinstate this page./ -Barefootsierra (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Notability looks possible, so I have restored the article, but moved it the draft space. It can now be found at Draft:Sierra Larson. Please see the articles for creation process by using the green submit button on the template I added to the page. This will allow you to get feedback from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion. Using this process is especially important if you have a conflict of interest, as implied by your user name. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Camberley Cricket Club

I, Smiler1991, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please reinstate the page Smiler1991 (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oldje.com

I, Cindy Class, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cindy Class (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

$heikh Zaman

$heikh Zaman My article page undeleted.

Replace 'reasoning' with the reason you wish to have the article undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qila Sheikhupura (talk • contribs) 15:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kamran Zahid

I want to re edit the content & get it approved as soon as possible. -Kamran Zahid 15:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetawan (talk • contribs)

@Poetawan: this was restored in January when you requested it. The page is now at Draft:Kamran Zahid as this is the preferred location now for draft articles. Going forward please sign your posts with ~~~~ so it is easier for us to respond and talk to you as there is no user Kamran Zahid.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cardflex, Inc.

Thousands of companies have Wikipedia entries, and we created ours in the same format as these other entries. There is no marketing or promotional copy in the text - merely some basic history and background about what this company is and what it does. Please let us know specifically why we are not allowed the same privilege to be part of Wikipedia as the other companies now listed on the site. -71.170.193.227 (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:SkylarDoesMinecraft

Please don't delete this because all this IS RELIABLE because it it an article about Savageookwolf. I mean, who knows more about Savageookwolf than Savageookwolf? And all this information is reliable because I am savageookwolf's friend and it's all true. It's an autobiography and doesn't need references. I feel as this deletion is a personal attack on him because I'm new on Wiki and my biography isn't deleted even though it's like his. Don't delete his biograghy! Don't delete it or delete mine too! -SkylarDoesMinecraft (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. Not only do we require references for biographical articles, but we very heavily discourage writing about oneself on Wikipedia as people have a tendency to aggrandise themselves. Also, other articles' presence or absence does not justify your own. Lastly, user pages are not substitutes for articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Wikipedia is not a webhost. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MAX MEAZZA Singer / Songwriter

I, Neiljaycody, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Neiljaycody (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. It is in no danger of being deleted anytime soon, but it won't be an article the way it is right now. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Energy Sword

This article was deleted per an AFD discussion in 2010, but I'm not wanting to restore the article, but rather its edit history. A possibly related article, Energy sword, was created recently. The edit history of Energy Sword may provide some content that could be merged into Energy sword. If there is reasonable edit history that could possibly be merged into Energy sword from Energy Sword, then I would like for Energy Sword to be recreated as a redirect to Energy sword as an {{R from alternative capitalization}}, and possibly a {{R from merge}}. -Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And if the article is kept, a history merge might be in order. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The histories are unrelated, so a history merge would not make sense. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allianz Australia

I have discussed the page and its contents with DGG ([1]) and I would be grateful for the opportunity to modify the existing page as per the feedback provided -00:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)MikiClarke (talk)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG#Speedy_deletion_of_Allianz_Australia
Not done. @MikiClarke: Hi Miki. DGG gave you some excellent advice, which included that you can "try again". This did not mean the prior article could or should be undeleted (and in fact it cannot be undeleted because it was a copyright violation), but that you actually try again from scratch. There is no impediment to your clicking on the red link above and to start writing. Please be careful of the advice. Don't copy and paste content again (understand that this also includes taking other people's writing and modifying it only on the surface; what we call close paraphrasing); take a look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Help:Referencing for beginners, and note our requirement that the article be written from a neutral point of view, which is usually extremely difficult for people like you with a conflict of interest. Also, please don't ignore his advice advice about complying with the Terms of Use by providing mandatory disclosure of your paid editing. You should have already done so, before taking any steps regarding the prospective article. See more at Terms of use/FAQ on paid contributions without disclosure, which was also linked for you by DGG.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

translation in other other laguage

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -RichaChaudhary (talk) 07:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)translation in other language[reply]

You need to be writing those translated articles in the appropriate-language Wikipediae. The English Wikipedia has no use for content that is not in English. See also meta:List of Wikipedias. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite

I, Sam at LI-COR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sam at LI-COR (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam at LI-COR: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Image Studio Lite. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minimally Invasive Surgical Institute

I, SplashMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and add it to the [of Texas Hospitals] in Dallas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SplashMedia (talk • contribs)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (NawlinWiki (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. G11 is not the "abandoned draft" speedy criterion, it's the "Unambiguously promotional" criterion. I will note the requestor is blocked as a promotional account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done "SplashMedia" has been blocked since they were here to spam, article was deleted as G11 so it is not eligible for restore. I'd suggest taking a look at WP:PSCOI instead. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speaker Knockerz

Blatant guideline violation: WP:CSD#G4 policy excludes pages that are "not substantially identical to the deleted version" (see different versions), and/or "pages to which the reason for the deletion" (see WP:TOOSOON) no longer applies -71.82.114.12 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, TOOSOON was obviously a dumb thing to say at the AfD of a dead person, but this isn't AfD2. The new article wasn't the same as the old one, but there was no indication anything had changed since then either... I think the subject is arguably notable, but I can't restore the article in place for you. I could restore it to draft space so that you can work on it without threat of rapid deletion, if you like. It would then need to be approved by an experienced user to move back to mainspace (which is to your own benefit - you don't want it to be deleted rapidly again after all). Let me know if interested. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See Draft:Speaker Knockerz. If you want to help work on it there, feel free. 71.82.114.12 (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohit Jain

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wowmohitjain (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wowmohitjain:  Not done. All these links are basically reports of the same event. Congratulations on setting a record for mass-creating websites, but being in the papers only for one event is not enough for Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirement, see also WP:Notability (summary). In any case, Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves - please read Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rajesh bhola

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sombir9555 (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Dear Sir, A strong protest is herewith lodged against the morality principles of Wikipedia. It had been indeed very shocking to see that suddenly the said article which was published by Wikipedia (through submission of the same in Articles for Creation AFC and not created by my own self) after due course of discussions / verifications of references and links etc has been deleted without assigning plausible / tangible reasons after 9 months of its creation on 6 July 2014. Though I am a regular duly logged in contributor to Wikipedia and has made certain quality contributions in growth of Wikipedia by submitting articles / modification from time to time, the said arbitrary and erratic deletion has pained me immensely.[reply]
I have been informed that “This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.”
The reason / argument given is false and misleading. The person about whom the article is published is notable as per your rules. The notability is duly established by way of attachment of number of references which are authentic sources for making the subject notable. The submissions made by me were duly accepted by you and hence the article was published by you under AFC and not directly by myself. The notability of the subject is duly established by way of his contributions to the most esteemed newspapers and periodicals of India. He has made more than 200 contributions to such papers and periodicals apart from being founder of Spastic Society of Gurgaon where more than thousands of children afflicted with autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities are being taken care of and a page is duly published by you on the same after due acknowledgement of the notability of that subject.
It is unethical to delete a page which is published by you in AFC after taking due cognizance of all the aspects and criteria of notability and genuineness of the subject until something to the contrary is found or reported! How can an article published by you 9 months back be suddenly deleted with the above reason when due debate was held and the article was published by your official in AFC after due submission of article by me.
I request you to immediately undelete the article for the creation of which due process of compliance of Wikipedia criteria and policies has already been done. Let your readers, who are spread in all the nooks and corners of this planet, retain trust in your policies which should not sound arbitrary at any stage of evolution of Wikipedia. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sombir9555 (talk • contribs)

@Sombir9555:  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Bhola, it cannot be undeleted through this process.
AfC reviewers are not "officials", they are ordinary users who give some of their time to helping newer users by reviewing their contributions. Acceptance at AfC means that in the reviewer's opinion the article is acceptable, but it is not a guarantee that it will be kept or that it cannot be nominated for deletion.
If you believe that the article was significantly different from the one deleted in April 2013, so as to overcome the reasons for deletion there, you should approach the deleting adminstrator, user RHaworth (talk). Then, if you are not satisfied, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Update:  Done - page restored by Shirt58. JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinder Sahota

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kaurdhillon (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaurdhillon: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Rosen

This article was deleted, as an expired prod in 2006. There is a Christine Rosen who was awarded a prestigious fellowship. I request userification, to see if the prodded article is about the same person. Geo Swan (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan:  Done - looks like the same person. JohnCD (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Comfort Windows

I, Slightlynine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Slightlynine (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Broadbandchoices

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -WikiuserUK (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The page was deleted under G11 (advertising). While I wouldn't quite call it advertising, it was rather promotional. If you are interested in starting a new draft article on the subject, let me know and I can restore what was there to draft space. From there, you could get feedback from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion. If you are able to improve the draft, it could potentially return to mainspace. The article won't be restored to mainspace as is, however. Let me know if interested WikiuserUK --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
could I see what the issue is? or can you simply remove it and restore the page? thanks -WikiuserUK (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously, if I restore it to draft space you can see the text. If you want it restored in mainspace, you'll need to contact the deleting admin: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


can you please restore it into draft so I can check it?

also how do I contact the admin who deleted it?

thanks -WikiuserUK (talk) 08:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, and user blocked as an obvious sockpuppet. Yunshui 雲水 09:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have unblocked and restored the page to Draft:Broadbandchoices. Previous account was blocked for a username violation, so even if this is the same person a new account is permitted. WikiuserUK, do not attempt to move this article back to mainspace yourself unless you want it deleted and yourself blocked. (I am going out on a bit of a limb to help you here, so I can't be lenient on this point.) Instead, use the submit button on the an articles for creation template that I added to the page when you think it is ready and it will be reviewed by an experienced editor. They will then either move it to mainspace or let you know what needs done to make it acceptable. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RLLMUK

The article appears to have been speedily deleted with rationale "Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" - however the article contained references indicating the importance of the site as the largest UK videogames forum and this can be incorporated into the article if needed -Tim (Xevious) (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I went ahead and restored it. @Xevious:, please add a sourced claim to notability ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:JennyA12988/sandbox

I, JennyA12988, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JennyA12988 (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Let me apologize JennyA12988 as the page should not have actually been deleted since you had edited it after getting a notice of pending G13 deletion. It has been restored. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:PatioShoppers, Inc.

I, JMD2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JMD2014 (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Levy

This page was deleted in 2009 for 'Vandalism', I'm not certain what sort of vandalism. Jeremy Levy's organization PQI has gotten much bigger in the past few years and I think he should have an active wikipedia page. -Joelibm (talk) 21:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The 2009 article was a hoax/joke article about a fake person (or nominally about someone with the same name with made up facts). You are free to create a new page if you think Levy is notable, but there is nothing to restore. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheUnknownNinjaNN2/sandbox

I, 50.158.232.91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.158.232.91 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomadic Fanatic

I created this page because Nomadic Fanatic is a youtube icon and is very well know I was going to improve article over time but now can't do so due to it being deleted. -Articlecreater99 (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - The page was deleted because it didn't explain why this person might meet our inclusion criteria for web content. In short you will need references to reliable sources to prove notability. If you wish to develop the page slowly, I suggest you do so in draft space at Draft:Nomadic Fanatic. That way, you aren't under threat of rapid deletion. Keep in mind the subject will have to meet the inclusion criteria for the article to survive in mainspace, so you might want to give that some thought before continuing to avoid wasting your time. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peak Reliability

I, 67.189.125.134, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 67.189.125.134 (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done While it was nominally deleted under G13, the page was declined as a copyright violation and blanked before that. Wikipedia cannot accept text copied from other locations (such as the Peak Reliability website, as was done here). Feel free to start a new draft using your own words, but there is nothing usable to restore. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soft Robotics

The article has been deleted because of a copyright issue. Unfortunately, various attempts to get the review to provide me with details, what was actually the issue, did not work. He did not respond. There I would like to get the draft and see, which parts I could delete to avoid the copyright infringement. The article is quite extensive, since a lot of people have been working on it and it would be a pity to loos all the work, because of one picture or sentence. Thank you so much for your help. Kind regards, -SirJamesHunt (talk) 11:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SirJamesHunt: working on it. This is a long draft, and so far I have found only two paragraphs that are direct copies. It should certainly be possible to restore most of it, but it will take a bit of time to check it properly. JohnCD (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCDt: Thank sooo much! I will then await your feedback. SirJamesHunt (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Groos

This person is a real person and a well known health practitioner in the field of naturopathy and colonic hydrotherapy in the United Kingdom Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -IngridBetancourt (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have moved the page to Draft:Roger Groos instead of deleting it to give you a chance to improve it. Being "a real person" is not sufficient for inclusion to Wikipedia. Instead you must demonstrate what we call notability, which in short means in depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Once you think you have satisfied that requirement, then use the green "submit this draft" button on the template at the top of the page and it will be reviewed by an experience editor. If you decide not to proceed, add {{db-g7}} to the top of the page and it will be deleted for you. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

StankStorm

I just want the document information back for future reference and further development. Clearly as it is not important or significant enough for the Glorious Wikipedia in which hundreds of pointless articles are submitted and accepted, i would like to have my information back so that i can submit it where they would appreciate it. kind regards :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARP50tm (talk • contribs) 14:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ARP50tm: see Wikipedia is not for things made up one day for why this is not suitable for Wikipedia. I will email the text to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or to anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Khushiar/Mohak Meet

I, Khushiar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Khushiar (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

mohak meet

The circumstances has been changed now. Mohak Meet's Bollywood movie named Anjaan Parindey had been released. So i want to edit the article. Please restore the page. Thanks. -Khushiar (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohak Meet, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spinningspark (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note, I have restored the draft version of the article above. You can work on improving it to meet the concerns expressed at the AfD there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Table of Content

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Psuf02 (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boyd Bushman

Please userfy article to my space, Possibly taking this to DRV, but need to see the history of the article. Thanks. -Valoem talk contrib 10:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Huber

I now have the requested references to the person -Lobsteroh (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=651198471"