User talk:Cirt: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[The Land of Gorch]]== |
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[The Land of Gorch]]== |
||
The article [[The Land of Gorch]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:The Land of Gorch]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MPJ-DK|MPJ-DK]]</small> -- [[User:MPJ-DK|MPJ-DK]] ([[User talk:MPJ-DK|talk]]) 02:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
The article [[The Land of Gorch]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:The Land of Gorch]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MPJ-DK|MPJ-DK]]</small> -- [[User:MPJ-DK|MPJ-DK]] ([[User talk:MPJ-DK|talk]]) 02:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Cirt |
|||
First of all thankyou for your guidance, although I find it hard to workout exactly what to do on Wikipedia being an extreme newcomer, not only to Wikipedia but to all social media... |
|||
The comments referencing my creation of an autobiography will I hope be answered in that I was not knowingly doing so, but rather correcting or modifying what others had written without realising the consequences. My edits were either typo corrections or mistaken additions followed by deletions. |
|||
Where I might have sought to provide references to note-worthy sections, there has appeared an unfortunate issue - many references that might be contemporary to the text have not survived the analogue era - i.e. no |
|||
links now exist. Everything written is true but how does it become verifiable? For example articles in the UK newspapers about the OneStopFresh deli in 2000-2010 have not survived archive limitations or the sites have gone off-line. |
|||
I also would like to comment that my husband Michael Messenger has tried to help in resolving these problems for Wikipedia, but he is not fluent either, and now also is on the 'Deletion' list! |
|||
Of course I think I have done some noteworthy stuff in my varied life: I helped myself through my careers and now help others but on Wikipedia, I seem to be being pilloried for blatant self-service - I am proud of my life but there has been no intent to self-glorify. |
|||
Please help me through the canyons of content - I can't see what should happen next... |
|||
regards |
|||
Victoria Nixon1[[User:VictoriaNixon1|VictoriaNixon1]] ([[User talk:VictoriaNixon1|talk]]) 14:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:00, 2 April 2016
This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 91 days ![]() |
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
| |
|
![]() |
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
|
Your GA nomination of Lie-to-children
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lie-to-children you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Land of Gorch
The article The Land of Gorch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Land of Gorch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Cirt
First of all thankyou for your guidance, although I find it hard to workout exactly what to do on Wikipedia being an extreme newcomer, not only to Wikipedia but to all social media...
The comments referencing my creation of an autobiography will I hope be answered in that I was not knowingly doing so, but rather correcting or modifying what others had written without realising the consequences. My edits were either typo corrections or mistaken additions followed by deletions. Where I might have sought to provide references to note-worthy sections, there has appeared an unfortunate issue - many references that might be contemporary to the text have not survived the analogue era - i.e. no links now exist. Everything written is true but how does it become verifiable? For example articles in the UK newspapers about the OneStopFresh deli in 2000-2010 have not survived archive limitations or the sites have gone off-line. I also would like to comment that my husband Michael Messenger has tried to help in resolving these problems for Wikipedia, but he is not fluent either, and now also is on the 'Deletion' list! Of course I think I have done some noteworthy stuff in my varied life: I helped myself through my careers and now help others but on Wikipedia, I seem to be being pilloried for blatant self-service - I am proud of my life but there has been no intent to self-glorify. Please help me through the canyons of content - I can't see what should happen next... regards Victoria Nixon1VictoriaNixon1 (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)