Jump to content

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign/Final draft vote: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Option 3: support
Kookykman (talk | contribs)
1,207 edits
→‎Option 1: Sidebar option #1
Line 462: Line 462:
# [[User:Esoltas|Evan]] 18:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Esoltas|Evan]] 18:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
# '''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 19:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
# '''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 19:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Kookykman|Kookykman]]|<font color="black">[[User talk:Kookykman|(t)]]</font><font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|''e'']]</font> 00:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


<!-- Please sign your name with:
<!-- Please sign your name with:

Revision as of 00:13, 25 September 2006

Through much discussion, the general consensus has been narrowed to three options for the redesign of the sidebar for the English Wikipedia. It is time to vote on which is to be used. This new sidebar if adopted will be done so by the entire en.wikipedia. There is of course the option of going with how things are (the original sidebar), and voting for that design is how to show that. See also the synopsis of the Reasons behind the changes at the project page.

The only difference between the 3 redesign drafts are the titles of the 1st and 3rd boxes. You may vote for multiple options.

(Original)
navigation
search
toolbox
(1)
browse
search
interact
toolbox
(2)
navigation
search
interaction
toolbox
(3)
navigation
search
information
toolbox

Sidebar Redesign Vote

Simply sign your name below to show your vote. Discussion that has already taken place can be found here. Remember: You may vote for multiple options. 

Please sign your name with this code:

# ~~~~


Original

  1. Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 08:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC) (see 3 below)[reply]
  2. John Reid 10:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mgm|(talk) 10:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. thunderboltz(Deepu) 13:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. – Chacor 15:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Eltomzo 17:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. —Daniel (‽) 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Cynical 19:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sugarpinet 00:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Coasttocoast 00:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. (see below for reason) Trapolator 00:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Iamthecockatoo 19:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Daniel_123  ► ► 12:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC) god, I hate this whole idea....[reply]
  14. --ais523 10:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) (strangely enough, I'm voting for the original and for option 3, but not 1 or 2)
  15. ZIGBO 21:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC) I love the original interface and I have become attached to it (almost literally even if it is physically impossible).[reply]
  16. digital_me(Talk•Contribs) 16:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Blackjack48 21:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Notgonnalie 21:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Only do a redesign if it is a redesign, this is a re-navigation in its infancy.[reply]
  19. Storkk 03:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC) - Original & 3.[reply]
  20. Minidoxigirli 04:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Homestarmy 13:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. De Nam 17:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nauticashades 17:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --HamedogTalk|@ 09:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cmcb 20:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Cory Liu 02:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. —dto (talkcontribs) 04:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Jumbo Snails 05:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Dev920 19:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Y0u | Y0ur talk page 01:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Elfalem 07:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Mark J 14:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC) No point to change.[reply]
  33. Apple9 15:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oorah0311 17:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Stercus.caput 21:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. A Max J 00:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Option 1

  1. Aein 12:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Quiddity 01:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. David Levy 01:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. plange 06:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lcarsdata (Talk) 06:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Locriani 06:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -- Lost(talk) 06:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 07:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gareth Aus 07:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Electionworld Talk? 07:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC) (BTW: see remark below on Special pages)[reply]
  11. --Dhartung | Talk 07:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Raul654 07:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Looks great! —Nightstallion (?) 08:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. liquidGhoul 08:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Alalsacienne 08:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. —msikma <user_talk:msikma> 09:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC) - excellent work, all! Can't wait to see it go live![reply]
  17. Serein 11:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Aura Auroranorth 12:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Proptology 23:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jeb8828 12:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Batmanand | Talk 13:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Good work to everyone who contributed to this project.[reply]
  23. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 13:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. thunderboltz(Deepu) 13:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Delta Tango 13:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Monotonehell 14:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Gronkmeister | Talk/ Contrib 17:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. William Pietri 15:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Looks good, stresses action within the project. --Danaman5 15:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. – Chacor 15:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Atb129 16:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. JoeSmack Talk 16:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Filceolaire 16:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Michaelas10 17:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wareh 17:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Decidedly so 17:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kaldari 17:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. .* 18:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. —Daniel (‽) 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 20:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 20:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC) - Great job Quiddity et al for making this happen![reply]
  42. Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 20:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Lkjhgfdsa 21:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Tra (Talk) 22:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. ~MDD4696 22:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. J. Finkelstein 23:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47.  Schweiwikist   (talk)  23:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --//Mac Lover TalkC 23:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --DavidHOzAu 23:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC) - Like Quiddity, I believe this to be the best one so far, and I give it my full support.[reply]
  50. --Sugarpinet 00:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Sarsaparilla39 00:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. -- danntm T C 00:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. jmeeter 00:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Randy Johnston 01:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Judgesurreal777 01:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Some P. Erson 02:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Xhin 03:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC) - I like its dynamic nature, makes you feel a part of the encyclopedia (which you are).[reply]
  58. jszack 03:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Adamkik 04:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. GumbyProf: "I'm about ideas, but I'm not always about good ideas." 04:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Pepsi2786 04:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Roger Chrisman 04:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. LBMixPro <Speak|on|it!> 06:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ganeshk (talk) 06:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Shushruth \talk page \ contribs 07:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. KissL (don't forget to vote!) 07:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Missmarple 07:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Davidkinnen 07:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jbuzza 09:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Eug 11:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. 0L1 12:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. RedZebra 13:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Sandstein 13:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Readro 13:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Mutton 17:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Jaredh 18:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Oliver202 19:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Arvindn 20:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Hezzy 21:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. feydey 22:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Thunderbrand 22:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Srice13 23:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mausami 23:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. zephyr2k 23:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Dave 00:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Panic-Button 00:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --gatoatigrado 01:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Silas Snider (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Syndicalista 02:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I like the active words[reply]
  90. Fieari 07:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Heritage88 09:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Headings are the best in this one. --Jannex 15:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. AndrewBuck 19:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. xompanthy 20:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Askari Mark | Talk 20:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Bookandcoffee 21:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. -- nae'blis 00:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Tobyk777 00:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. –Outriggr § 02:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. FlyingPenguins 05:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Nick Watts 10:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. --Kjoonlee 11:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Fredofromstart 15:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC) - Verbs are shorter than nouns, briskier, and more lively : I like it.[reply]
  104. 24.49.137.239 01:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. MadRabbit 06:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 10:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. JonasRH 12:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. CBD 13:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC) You folks all had to be crazy to stick with this. Well done. :][reply]
  109. Wikikob 13:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. —Mets501 (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC) - I love it :-)[reply]
  111. --Circle-Green 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ryudo 20:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Ryudo[reply]
  113. Carcharoth 20:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Greg Back 20:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  115. American Patriot 1776 22:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --ReemaS 05:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Jpe|ob 06:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Ag3n7-Fli 07:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  119. CaseKid 07:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  120. KungFuMonkey 07:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Mlm42 10:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. MikesPlant 10:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Dozerina 12:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 17:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC) -- Much better[reply]
  125. I'm fine with either this or 3. --tjstrf 18:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  126. hr_oskar 18:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Mgiganteus1 21:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  128. --hello,gadren 22:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Riurik (discuss) 01:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  130. —dima/s-ko/ 02:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Nice use of verbs. Peter O. (Talk) 07:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Terri G 13:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Psycardis 14:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Charlie GALVIN 19:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Cory Liu 02:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  136. wild-gazelle 03:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  137. IntrigueBlue 05:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Ligulem 12:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  139. LestatdeLioncourt 13:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Roses are red, Violets are blue, I'm schizophrenic, and so am I. 20:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Kwekubo 23:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Perimosocordiae 00:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Ξon2see talk⁄contribsΞ 21:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC): Gee... I think this looks great...[reply]
  144. Miguel Andrade 03:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Arbiteroftruth 09:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Mike 10:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Wisersumo 11:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  148. paula clare80.41.151.51 13:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Meganjcasey 14:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Flying Canuck 16:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Vidcapper 16:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  152. --Kprateek88(Talk | Contribs) 17:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Titoxd(?!?) 22:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  154. — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 00:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  156. CatScratch 01:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  157. james(talk) 01:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Kleio08 02:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  159. --Howard the Duck 02:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Bearingbreaker92 03:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Streetsabre 05:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  162. kevin 06:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Rouge Rosado Oui? 07:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Apple9 15:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  165. → JARED (t)  16:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  166. XDarklytez 18:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  167. David | Talk 18:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Evan 18:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Voice-of-All 19:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Kookykman|(t)e 00:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Option 2

  1. JoeSmack Talk 04:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Twelve 06:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ancheta Wis 06:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. AlexCovarrubias 07:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lbalhorn 11:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. LunceFordPrefect 17:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kaldari 17:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Serein 18:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hedwig0407 04:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. KissL (don't forget to vote!) 07:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Snailwalker | talk 11:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC) - But I think the titles should start with a capitalletter so it's Navigation instead of navigation[reply]
  12. Sandstein 13:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Silas Snider (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. -- nae'blis 00:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Starcreator
  16. Hellomistergibbs 16:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. CBD 13:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC) You folks all had to be crazy to stick with this. Well done. :][reply]
  18. Paragon12321 01:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Quaerere 01:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ryandsmith 01:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Option 3

  1. Dogface 17:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TeamColtraTeamcoltra 16:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alfredo Silva - --42croad 14:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rfrisbietalk 02:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. encyclopedist 08:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gurch 10:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 11:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 12:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Doctor BrunoTalk 12:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Lincher 12:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  — MrDolomite | Talk 13:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. yeti 14:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. LinaMishima 14:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fang Aili talk 16:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Victortan 16:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Kaldari 17:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Serein 18:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. tooto 23:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. NCurse work 23:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Opabinia regalis 00:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nebular110 02:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. wildboyz_211 03:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Edratzer 09:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Aussie King Pin 10:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Squidfish 12:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 17:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. MithrandirMage 18:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Roninbk 18:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Badbilltucker 19:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Apeder 19:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Silas Snider (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC) - a really small issue, but this looks more professional.[reply]
  33. \/\/slack (talk) 02:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. WGee 03:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. BJ 04:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Psp401.com 07:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC) This looks like a good one...great designs I guess...[reply]
  37. Fieari 07:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. RCEberwein 23:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 91BOY 00:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. -Freebird- 01:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC) More clarifying one I guess.[reply]
  41. JeffW 03:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --ais523 10:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) (strangely enough, I'm voting for the original and for option 3, but not 1 or 2)
  43. PlatinumX 10:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC) All of these have problems, but I like this one best[reply]
  44. Ignis 13:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. MissIzzy 9:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  46. CEFALOUS 11:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Andeh 15:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Nynexman4464 18:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Philbert2.71828 19:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. i like 3 if not then 1 then original and lastly 2 Guaguis 22:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. OscarTheCat 22:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Storkk 03:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC) - Original & 3.[reply]
  54. -- Chris chat edits essays 04:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kingutd 07:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. CBD 13:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC) You folks all had to be crazy to stick with this. Well done. :][reply]
  57. --Turbo Geek 13:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC) The headings for this option are bit more professional :D[reply]
  58. 81.157.173.161 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. G1076 03:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. -- tariqabjotu 03:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC) (consistency w/ part of speech)[reply]
  61. Monocrat 06:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. JohnnoShadbolt 07:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Golbez 08:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Bill the Greek 08:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC) (I like the headings more; I certainly don't like the "browse" on option 1)[reply]
  65. Nauticashades 17:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. It's either this or option 1. tjstrf 18:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Gphoto 12:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. 200.82.33.185 21:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Smockdotcom 22:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC) Because "browse" sounds horribly unprofessional.[reply]
  71. Terri G 13:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. huntersquid 17:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Jeske (SHOUT!) 03:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. MarcoTolo 04:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. —dto (talkcontribs) 04:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 05:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Alkari 05:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ligulem 12:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Seems most sensible, although any of the 3 new ones are a huge improvement. I'm not sure why you need the word "navigation" (or "browse") at all really. Guess I should have said in the design stage. —Pengo talk · contribs 13:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Jniles 16:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Shinobu 18:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. ♠PMC♠ 19:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Cool3 20:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Lincolnite 21:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Y0u | Y0ur talk page 01:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Picaroon9288 02:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. DRGrim 04:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Phiba 09:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. mahawiki 12:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 18:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. (Liberatore, 2006). 21:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Bkid 22:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Aetheling 00:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Benabik 01:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Q of E 04:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Stebbins 05:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Iorek85 07:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Australian Matt 10:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. UKWiki 12:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Atchom 17:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Stercus.caput 21:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. KingPenguin 00:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Moved to talk page

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Sidebar_redesign/Final_draft_vote&oldid=77628514"