Jump to content

User:JeanLaurentAudin

This user is in the Penguin Cabal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JeanLaurentAudin (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 19 August 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

La Motte cellars, Franschhoek, South Africa
La Motte cellars, Franschhoek, South Africa




In the life of the individual, an aesthetic sensibility is both more authentic and more commendable than a political or religious one.

“Art is the imposing of a pattern on experience, and our aesthetic enjoyment is recognition of the pattern.” ― Alfred North Whitehead [1]

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be falsifiable; and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak about reality." ― Karl Popper


About this page

I intend to use this page for useful things that aid editing. For now, it has become a bit of a sandbox to learn the intricacies of Wikipedia beyond that of a mere repository of text.

Articles that I would like to improve

People

  1. Hsiao Li Lindsay, Baroness Lindsay of Birker
  2. Alice Vickery

Nobility

  1. Sibyl Hathaway
  2. Marie Collings
  3. William Thomas Collings

Royalty

  1. Maria Leopoldine of Austria
  2. Blanche of Burgundy

Biology

  1. Aptostichus angelinajolieae
  2. Aptostichus bonoi

Miscellaneous

  1. Gimnazija Mostar
  2. Franz Joseph Bridge
  3. UCT
  4. Saint Mary's Church, Jajce

Travels

Countries that I have visited
This user has never left
her native planet.
This user has traveled to different parts of the world.
This user has cruised the Mediterranean Sea.
This user has cycled in Switzerland.
This user has visited France.
This user has visited Italy.

Comments on Wikipedia

"I am not exaggerating when I say it is the closest thing to Kafka's The Trial I have ever witnessed, with editors and administrators giving conflicting and confusing advice, complaints getting “boomeranged” onto complainants who then face disciplinary action for complaining, and very little consistency in the standards applied. In my short time there, I repeatedly observed editors lawyering an issue with acronyms, only to turn around and declare “Ignore all rules!” when faced with the same rules used against them. -- David Auerbach, "Encyclopedia Frown", Slate, December 2014


  • Iron Law of Oligarchy: An empirical study of 683 Wikia wikis found support for the claims that the iron law of oligarchy holds in wikis; i.e. that the wiki's transparent and egalitarian model does not prevent the most active contributors from obtaining significant and disproportionate control over those projects. In particular, the study found that as wiki communities grow 1) they are less likely to add new administrators; 2) the number of edits made by administrators to administrative “project” pages will increase and 3) the number of edits made by experienced contributors that are reverted by administrators also grows. The authors also note that while there are some interesting exceptions to this rule, proving that wikis can, on occasion, function as egalitarian, democratic public spaces, on average "as wikis become larger and more complex, a small group – present at the beginning – will restrict entry into positions of formal authority in the community and account for more administrative activity while using their authority to restrict contributions from experienced community members".[1]
  • From a book review of Dariusz Jemielniak's Common Knowledge: "Declaring the notion of an administrative cabal is laughable on the surface.. but there is a grain of truth to it – admins talk to one another, including privately, "secretly" and off wiki, and they act, more or less consciously, as a part of a group that holds power over regular editors. Jemielniak argues that the notion of editor equality is a subconscious, invisible and unrealistic pillar of Wikipedia, one that when confronted with the reality of editors not being equal leads to problems and growing divisions within the community. Thus the inequality between editors, which in the "ideal Wikipedia" would not exist, subconsciously annoys editors, and is significantly responsible for the problems with retention of editors, electing new administrators, and cohesion of the community, of whom a significant portion entertains some notions of the existence of a "real cabal" (see WP:CABAL). In this, his research fits into the wider paradigm of scholarly literature concerned with social inequality, and with its common conclusion that inequality is the major cause of the vast majority of problems in human society.[2]
  • The Unblockables, a class of elitist editors who get away with incivility because they make good contributions. As Wales said, "it's a shame that some in the community think that it's worthwhile putting up with nasty people if they make good contributions."
On different notes..
  • "Crowd Governance", a study finds that after the creation of a Wikipedia article about a publicly traded company, its stock price drops. Apparently, insiders and institutional investors see an article (ie. transparency) as signifying they no longer have an edge on investing information.
  • "Wikipedia is fixing one of the Internet’s biggest flaws" (Washington Post) - a terribly encouraging article. Wikipedia is emerging as a model of what works for Internet discourse on controversial topics. Might our guidelines and policies be enshrined someday into a broader generic set that could be applied for any website who wished to adopt them in a Constitutional manner?
  • Martin, Brian (2017). "Persistent Bias on Wikipedia: Methods and Responses". Social Science Computer Review
  • "The longer a person has lived the less he gains by reading, and the more likely he is to forget what he has read and learnt of old; and the only remedy that I know of is to write upon every subject that he wishes to understand, even if he burns what he has written." -- Thomas Young, polymath, deciphered Rosetta Stone

- this section was taken from GreenC.

Toolbox & Satchel

Wiki-exploration: beyond Wikipedia...

Wikipedia is part of the Wikimedia family. To explore other wikis, see Wikimedia's InterWiki map. Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:

Read more:  
Wiki  
Become a Wikipedia tipster
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}


Show recent changes to
Ancient Egypt
watchlist articles
     
This list:

Inline icon templates by shape and color

Any of the following inline, comment-level templates can be converted into {{Resolved}}-style hatnotes by using {{Resbox}} to put a box around the icon and text.

Green check marks
 Implemented {{Implemented}}
check Partially implemented {{PImplemented}}
 Resolved {{Resolved mark}}
Accepted {{Accepted}}
Agree {{Agree}}
Approved {{Approved}}
Checked {{Checked2}}
 Verified {{Verified}}
Conditional yesCY {{Conditional yes}}
 Confirmed {{Confirmed}}
 Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). {{Confirmed-nc}}
 Technically indistinguishable {{Tallyho}}
checkY {{Tick}}
Helped {{Helped}}
 Done {{Done}}
 Completed {{Edited2}}
 Task complete. {{Donetask}}
 Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. {{Unprod}}
Answered on user's talk page. {{Autp}}
Responded at the appropriate venue. {{Responded}}
 Sure! {{Sure}}
 Revoked {{Revoked}}
  checkY Merger complete. {{Merge done}}
✓ {{Marked}}
✓ Pass {{Pass}}
Green tickY {{Aye}}
 Yes {{Yes check}}
✓ {{Y&}}
Green checkmarkY {{Yeac}}
Gray check markYg {{Yeag}}
Cross marks
☒N {{Xmark}}
☒N This offer has expired {{Expired}}
☒N Deleted {{Deleted}}
 Not done {{Not done}}
Not done – empty request {{Not done empty request}}
Not done – please clarify {{Not done unclear}}
☒N Not done and not likely to be done {{Not done not likely}}
☒N Stale {{Stale-small}}
Rejected {{Smallrejected}}
☒N {{X mark}}
Red XN {{Nay}}
 No {{No mark}}
✗ Not done {{Not done-t}}
✗ Fail {{Fail}}
✗ {{N&}}
NoN {{X mark-n}}
X'ed box {{Xed box}}
Cancelled {{Cancelled}}
 Prohibited {{Prohib}}
 Deleted {{Deleted-image}}
Red X Already declined {{Already declined}}
Red X Blocked {{Opblocked}}
Red X User blocked {{User-blocked}}
Red X Not a bug {{Notabug}}
Red X Not fixed {{Notfixed}}
Red X Won't fix {{Won't fix}}
Red X I withdraw my nomination {{Withdraw}}
Red X No technical evidence {{Nojoy}}
Red X Unrelated {{Unrelated}}
Red X Off-topic {{Off-topic talk}}
Red X symbolN {{Nayc}}
Gray X symbolNg {{Nayg}}
Black check marks
 Already done {{Already done}}
 Resolved {{Resolved1}}
YesY {{Check mark-n}}
Checked {{Checked}}
checked box {{Checked box}}
Yellow check marks
 Half done {{Half done}}
 Partly done {{Partly done}}
Blue check marks
checkmark Semi-done {{Semi-done}}
checkmark Go ahead {{Go ahead}}
 Fixed {{Fixed}}
 Fixed by reporter {{Fixed by reporter}}
 Pending {{Bug pending}}
 Resolved {{Bug resolved}}
 Blocked and tagged {{Blockedandtagged}}
 Blocked without tags {{Blockedwithouttags}}
 Tagged {{Socks tagged}}
 No tags {{No tags}}
 IP block exemption granted {{Ipbedone}}
 IP blocked {{IPblock}}
 Proxy blocked {{Pblock}}
 Proxies blocked {{Psblock}}
 Range blocked {{Rblock}}
 Requested actions completed, closing {{Action and close}}
 Blocked and tagged. Closing. {{Blockedtaggedclosing}}
Minus sign
 Closed {{Close}}
 Denied {{Denied}}
no Disagree {{Disagree}}
no Not approved {{Unapproved}}
no Not bug {{NotBug}}
no Duplicate bug {{Duplicate bug}}
no Invalid {{Invalid}}
no Declined {{Declined}}
no No action {{No action}}
no No comment {{Nocomment}}
no Unnecessary {{Unnecessary}}
no No comment with respect to IP address(es) {{Nc}}
minus Removed {{Removed}}
minus Pulled {{Pulled}}
no Closing without action {{Closing without action}}
no Failed {{Failed-ga}}
Plus sign
plus Added {{Added}}
 Posted {{Posted}}
 Works for me {{Works for me}}
 Passed {{Passed}}
 Likely {{Likely}}
 Highly likely {{Highly likely}}
 Endorsed {{Endorsed+}}
 Clerk endorsed {{Endorse}}
 Clerk declined {{Decline}}
 Check declined – Checkusers will not link accounts to IPs, per the privacy policy. {{Decline-IP}}
 Endorsed by a checkuser {{Cu-endorsed}}
 Check declined by a checkuser {{Cudecline}}
 Delisted {{Delisted}}
 Inconclusive {{Inconclusive}}
 Not Applicable {{N/A icon}}
Neutral sign
 Closed {{Bug closed}}
 New: {{Bug new}}
 Second opinion requested {{GA2ndopinion}}
Gray equals sign= {{equc}}
Purple turn-right
 Deferred {{Deferred}}
 Defer to Abuse filter {{Deferabusefilter}}
 Defer to Local blacklist {{Deferblack}}
 Defer to Global blacklist {{Defermetablack}}
 Defer to WPSPAM {{Deferspam}}
 Defer to XLinkBot {{Deferspambot}}
 Defer to Whitelist {{Deferwhite}}
Simple clock
 Pending approval {{PendingRequest}}
 GA on hold {{GAOnHold}}
 On hold {{On hold}}
 On hold until {{OnHoldUntil}}
Magenta clockclock {{cloc}}
Clock
Orange clock Proposal on hold {{ProposalOnHold}}
 Reviewing request. {{Reviewing request}}
Pink clock Awaiting administrative action {{Awaitingadmin}}
ClockC {{Await}}
 Later {{Later}}
 Pending {{Tobedone}}
 Discussion ongoing...
 {{Discussing}}
 Doing... {{Doing}}
 [[User:|]] is doing... {{Isdoing}}
 Started {{Started}}
 In progress {{In progress}}
 Checking... {{Checking}}
 Reviewing... {{Reviewing}}
Information mark
information Needs discussion {{NeedsDiscussion}}
information Note: {{A note}}
information Administrator note {{Administrator note}}
 Assigned {{Bug assigned}}
Exclamation
 High Priority {{High priority}}
Nota bene* {{N.b.}}
 Urgent: {{Urgent}}
 Investigating... {{Investigating}}
exclamation mark  {{Bang}}
 Requesting immediate archiving... {{Archive now}}
 Bureaucrat note: {{Bureaucrat note}}
 Checkuser note: {{CUnote}}
 Acknowledged {{Bug acknowledged}} ({{Ack}})
 Confirmed {{Bug confirmed}}
 Comment: {{Comment}}
 Remind {{Remind}}
 Remark: {{Remark}}
 Clerk note: {{Clerk note}}
 Robot clerk note: {{Clerk note bot}}
 Renamer note: {{Renamer note}}
 Coordinator note: {{Coordinator-note}}
 This review has not received any comments in two weeks. {{Stale GAN}}
red-outlined triangle containing exclamation point Warning {{Warning sign}}
red-outlined triangle containing exclamation point Caution {{Caution sign}}
Question mark
question mark Suggestion {{Suggestion}}
? Maybe {{Maybe-t}}
question mark Maybe {{Maybe-i}}
Question? {{Qmark}}
Question? {{Question mark}}
{{InfoNeeded}}
Not done for now {{Not done for now}}
Not sure {{Not sure}}
Not sure. {{Not sure2}}
 Question: {{Question}}
 foo: {{Question|label=foo}}
 Additional information needed {{MoreInfo}}
 Feedback required {{Bug feedback}}
Blue question mark? {{Idkc}}
Bulb
Light bulb iconB {{Bulb}}
Flashing bulbB {{Bulb2}}
Idea: {{Idea}}
light bulb New proposal {{NewProposal}}
Smile
Thank you {{Thank you}}
 Thank you very much! {{Thank you very much}}
Smiley You're welcome! {{You're welcome}}
Smiley Sorry! {{Sorry}}
 Thanks {{Thank}}
Thank you {{WikiThanks}}
Smiley No problem! {{No problem}}
Thumb sign
Thumbs down icon {{Thumbs down}}
Thumbs up icon {{Thumbs up}}
Thumbs up icon {{(y)}}
Thumbs down icon {{(n)}}
thumbs up Great! {{Great}}
👍 Like {{Like}}
 Dislike {{Dislike}}

Others

ω Awaiting {{Awaiting}}
(orange butt icon Buttinsky) {{Buttinsky}}
 Comment. {{Commentvote}}
 Dupe {{Bug dupe}}
Merged {{Clerk-Note-merged}}
bug   New bug {{NewBug}}
  Bug fixed {{BugFixed}}
copy   Duplicate proposal {{DuplicateProposal}}
confused face icon Just curious... {{Justcurious}}
shuffling arrows Proposal out of scope {{ProposalOutOfScope}}
 Moved to Commons {{Moved to commons}}
Orz... {{Orz}}
( Peanut gallery comment) {{Peanut}}
 Possibly {{Possibly}}
eye I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. {{Read}}
Yes Received {{Received}}
flag Redflag {{Redflag}}
trash Redundant {{Redundant symbol}}
recycle Reopened {{Reopened}}
@Example: {{Reply to}}
arrow Reverted {{Reverted}}
rimshotⓘ {{Rimshot}}
lens Review {{Twomanrule}}
lens Review – This section is under review or has been partially reviewed by {{UnderReview}}
Facepalm Facepalm {{Facepalm}}
scissors Running with scissors is too dangerous for Wikipedia! {{Scissors}}
trout Self-trout {{Self-trout}}
trout Self-whale... for when a trout just isn't enough {{Self-whale}}
Yes Sent {{Sent}}
per snowball clause {{Snow}}
SUL Check {{SULcheck}}
 ToDo {{ToDo}}
eraser Undone {{Undone}}
 Uploaded {{Uploaded}}
 Request withdrawn {{Withdrawn}}
 Working {{Working}}
 Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. {{WPcrystalball}}
 Completed {{Completed}}
 Blocked but awaiting tags {{Sblock}}
 Possible {{Possible}}
 Not possible {{Not possible}}
 Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) {{Possilikely}}
 Unlikely {{Unlikely}}
minus Replaced {{Replaced}}
 Looks like a duck to me {{Duck}}
{{Duck2}}
 Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me {{Megaphoneduck}}
 1.75x amplified ultimate quack of ultimate destiny {{Megaphoneduck|ultimate}}
 Clerk assistance requested: {{Clerk Request}}
 Relisted {{Relisted}}
 No sleepers immediately visible {{Nosleepers}}
 Behavioural evidence needs evaluation {{Behaviour}}
Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested {{GlobalLocksRequested}}
 Stale {{StaleIP}}
magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: {{8ball}}
crystal ball CheckUser is not a crystal ball {{Crystalball}}
fish CheckUser is not for fishing {{Fishing}}
 CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{Pixiedust}}
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ {{Shrug}}
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) {{Lenny}}
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ {{Table flip}}

Multi-sign templates

The following templates implement several icons:

Others

Experimenting with userboxes

Art & Marine Life

This user enjoys scrapbooking.
A fountain penThis user prefers to write with a fountain pen.
This user is an art lover.
This user is an amateur artist.
{User:FireBlade708/userboxes/crazy for dolphins}}
A collection of seashells.This user collects Seashells
Sea TurtleThis user likes Sea turtles.
This user likes jellyfish.

Images

Tables of interesting things

Notes & References

  1. ^ Oxford Essential Quotations (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. 2016. ISBN 9780191826719.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:JeanLaurentAudin&oldid=1105307516"