User talk:Kinu/Archive 12
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Sockpuppets
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi. You just blocked Icepicked4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Icepicked5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as socks of Icepicked3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All three of these are very obvious socks of serial vandal Runtshit, and I have retagged them accordingly. RolandR (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thanks for looking into the User:Asd86d Sock-puppetry case. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 05:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
|
Extreme incivility directed at you
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Your number one fan has some things to say. --Jprg1966 (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello Kinu. I just wanted to let you know that Wickedangry (talk · contribs) has gone right back to the edit warring that you blocked them for last week. They have yet to make a post on an article talk page so it is tough to get through to them about consensus. I did inform them about that on my talk page but they seem to have ignored it. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 16:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I think you are being a little hasty blocking talk page access for this user. Possibly I am assuming too much good faith, but I just left him a message, edit conflicting with your decline. It seems to me that we need if possible to make progress by discussion, rather than just walk away. Rich Farmbrough, 02:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC).
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
There was a DRV on July 1st - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_July_1 which looks like it went for restore. Opinions varied between AfD it again and it's OK. Personally, I'd go for a delete at AfD. Mention is made of new sources, but no-one has bothered to add them - whatever they are... Peridon (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Socking in the free world, from Istanbul to Torrance, CA
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi, Kinu. Is this an open proxy[1]? -- Rrburke (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thanks. I've never done what I did before, and although I looked at the instructions, I didn't put the new template at the "very top", even though the phrase was italicized. I almost asked someone to look at it for me; I'm glad you did so without being asked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Regarding your comment at Talk:James T. Thompson and User talk:Ethanagray; I don't think the user was a vandal; he was a new user, not understanding our collaborative editing process and how it was applied to an article he'd just started. Given our difficulties with editor retention, please consider how we might differentiate between confused newbies (however frustrating their actions may be) and deliberate vandals, and how you can help the former to become productive editors. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
Vandal block
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello Kinu. Some time ago you blocked this IP for vandalism on several road signs article. The IP has since continued, and I must now ask you to block it permanently. It's a sock a Jermboy27 (as he is known on Commons). Fry1989 eh? 01:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
|
A barnstar for you!
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Thanks!
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Well, that saved me the trouble of dragging him to ANI again. Cheers for doing the necessary. Yunshui 雲水 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revoking talk page for spammer
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there. A couple weeks ago you indeffed Aileen.abraham (talk · contribs). Today, that account spammed their talk page again. Is removing talk page access appropriate in these circumstances? Thanks. —Torchiest talkedits 20:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Since you were the original protecting/salting admin, just a heads up that it was re-created at Michael vincent mchugh. I only noticed the previous deletion when I tried to move it to the proper title. I've tagged it as a BLPPROD for now, but feel free to A7 it if you feel it meets that. Legoktm (talk) 09:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Thanks
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
All I remember is that my "IP address" was caught by an open proxy block, as I stated here. It was set to expire on November 30 at 8pm EDT. I appreciate the quick help. Platinum Star (talk)
|
ORDER OF ISABELLA THE CATHOLIC
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I am in intrigue as to how confirm whether the information is true or not? Now I did received the ORDER OF ISABELLA THE CATHOLIC and wanted to be reflected on WIKIPEDIA, so what do I need to provide to UPDATE it correctly. thanks Milton G. Uribe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milt1074 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Reminder
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Don't forget to log your blacklist addition. The log can be found here. If someone challenges a blacklisting in 6 or 12 months time any admin dealing with such a request must be able to find the reason for the listing. Cheers--Hu12 (talk) 04:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Would you mind if I...?
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
In this AfD: 1, you closed it by saying that it was "speedied". Would you mind if I changed it to "speedily deleted" so the AfD vote counter tool will be able to determine the result? Thanks--Go Phightins! 02:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
|
A barnstar for you!
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
A barnstar for you!
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
deletion of MaK(Verge Game Studio) and Verge Game Studio
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I do not mean to seem unfriendly! Currently you deleted the two mentioned articles. In case or "Verge Game Studio" i can understand because of the speedy deletion and i read and understood your arguments, but i dont think that the article "MaK(Verge Game Studio)" meets with your argumentation! Both articles were under constuction and on Mak was a mark that i have seven days to edit more details. About the advertisement: I tried to make the two sides objective, so i generally took the two sides Mojang and Minecraft as templates and inserted information i could find over the company and the game. I also got the affirmation from Verge Game Studio that they would increase the information by quality and quantity. If you recognize my argumentation why this sides didn't need to be deleted, is there a way to restore them of do a have to make them in my sandbox first? thanks P.S: New account, my old one "Bot91" also got deleted :( Bau912 (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
SolvedBau912 (talk) 15:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thank you for removing that message from my page. That was the second time he'd done that and I'd already reported him to AIV. Thank you ! KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 15:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thanks for the quick unblock. - Akamad (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you for your active help!
| |||
---|---|---|---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Kings Island Facts
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You deleted this sub page Kings Island Facts, This page is a subpage for Kings Island to contain lists of facts that do not belong on the main page for GA Staandard reasons. Please undo this.--Nickvet419 (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Joe Pulizzi page
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Could you please help me better understand why the 2nd nomination for deletion is taking place for the wiki page for Joe Pulizzi? Any advice on what can be deleted from the content, added to it for substantive information, etc. would be tremendously helpful. Thank you so much, Kinu! Cmcphillips (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)cmcphillips |
Serious bug!
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Can you tell me what is the serious bug they are talking about? --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion declined: GemSelect
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello Kinu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of GemSelect, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not that spammy and claims importance "largest suppliers of precious gems in the world". WP:CORP may not be met though, so it probably needs to go to WP:AFD. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Phone
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Sorry about that. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy I had started checking wiki through my phone and may have unintentionally hit some buttons by mistake. Sorry about that. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Kalyanasundaram
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
It must be right to delete this page. So you would have done it. But can I get to see the contents of this page so I can try to wikify it? --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi. Could you possibly move Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Adamah over the current redirect? Sent to the incubators because I was ban-evading when I created it, but I've just been unbanned. --Claritas § 06:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You deleted my page, with "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." as the reason. Is the author of a published book not sufficient importance? I understand that my page was incomplete - I have much more work to do on it. Can you please tell me how I can improve it so it will not be deleted again? Ipv6freely (talk) 08:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Page deletion
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Please delete Ramalingam selvanathan as no one has deleted the page from past 2 hrs Thanks Sriharsh1234 09:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
|
IP Block Exempt
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The local IP block exempt worked great. Thank you! --Odie5533 (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC) |
The Vision of Children Foundation
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, The article I am going to create was the title of a previously deleted article that represented SPAM or promotion. I will not be imitating the article that was previously deleted and my article will not contain any spam and follow all wikipedia policies. It notified me to perhaps talk to you since you deleted the original article. Thank you, --Bianca 11-8-12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianca Kof1234 Vision (talk • contribs) 18:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC) --Bianca Kof1234 Vision (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I created that page, but somebody told me it doesn't fit with the Wikipedia's notability standards, because he is still unelected. So, I asked for speedy deletion. Now, he has been elected. Would you please recover the created page, so I can edit it? Elecguy47 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Jiggy thakor
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu.Please visit on this page and tell me how can i remove this tag from my image : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jigar_no_jung.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiggythakor (talk • contribs) 03:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Can you explain why the Dai ling ping wiki was deleted
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I found the post to be quite valid , informative , and within context based around the welsh comedian and actor.Thank you for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.228.61 (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC) can you explain why the Dai Ling Ping Wiki was deleted. i have read over various comments that the character is not notable and also that a google search resulted in minimal hits. a recent search has given me 7,120,000 results. although Dai Ling Ping is a fictional character created by Mr LBX Media by the actor and comedian Mr LBX. we feel that the character is almost definately notable and somewhat a well known celebrity in wales.also an in depth search will also reveal that Mr LBX has one of the fastest growing brands in the uk today.thankyou for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.210.243 (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Michael Pollack
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi! Please check back at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pollack - I found new information that may be relevant WhisperToMe (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Jason West Jones
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I saw that you blocked User:Jason West Jones's sock. I'm not sure if you're familiar with all of the facts of the case - if you are, I apologize for telling you what you already knew, but if not, you might want to consider extending the block length.
Obviously, I present this all for your administrative discretion, but a) quite a few of these IPs were given rather long-term blocks by other admins and b) I'm not sure if a conclusive case has been previously put together to demonstrate that these were all Jason's sockpuppets, though RHaworth is clearly aware of this. I know that I just figured it was a vandal I'd battled with a few days ago, until I saw this latest unblock request, and started looking into things. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 04:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You have this editor indef-blocked for disruptive editing, and he has just posted an unblock request; he is, I think, only an occasional editor. I do not see any disruptive edits. He added incorrect information on Richard Nixon and was reverted and warned. He made no edit of any kind after his warning, but you blocked him about one hour later; in the absence of any transgression after his warning, this may be seen as harsh. Also, further to your block message, I do not see any evidence of past disruptive behaviour. Perhaps you see something that I don't, but is it possible that you may have confused two unrelated editors?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
|
Horseshoe Project
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Maybe you could help adopt this article? I think that if it could be expanded and transformed into an article about the interchange itself, with the reconstruction project as part of the history/future section, that we would have a much better treatment of the subject than the current paragraph which doesn't currently demonstrate notability. Imzadi 1979 → 01:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there; you recently blocked this Ip, very reasonably, for repeated vandalism. the site has been blocked before; the interesting thing is that the unblock request is exactly the same as one they posted five years ago, including the same spelling mistake! They must have a macro for unblock requests? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) |
AN/I
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thanks. RashersTierney (talk) 21:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
Talk page revert at 71.64.6.46
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Could you please explain how you justified this [15] talk page revert? I was trying to convince myself that I could make that same revert but I couldn't come up with a solid reason. The closest I could get was BLP or Personal information, since "bizarre crap that doesn't belong" (your "WTF?" apparently) doesn't usually warrant a revert, at least to me. Meters (talk) 22:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
|
ip vandal continues...
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there, Kinu. I wonder could you take another look here: [16]. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC) |
Kagiso
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there Kinu we are only asking to have the web site address as reference on the kagiso page, we have been working hard gathering local knowledge and have used our past experience to provide proper and correct information about this place. We are developing an information system to make it eay for people to nagivate or find what they want in kagiso. Could you please grant us just the reference http://www.kagisotownship.co.za — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaswiJoy (talk • contribs) 07:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC) |
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello! As a member of WP:USRD, you may be interested to know that we are doing the USRD Cup contest again this year! Signups are at the above page and the contest will begin February 1. --Rschen7754 10:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
As recently stated on the Rocket Records talk page , I am formally proposing a factually CORRECT move of this article to a page with the Wikipedia URL and proper subject heading of Rocket Record Company. I had already tried to submit the already existing article under that proper heading, but Kinu rejected the submission due to the duplicate article policy. If we as RESPONSIBLE Wikipedia writers/editors/administrators are going to contribute to the Wikipedia record label project in a correct manner, than this MUST be done. It is completely wrong to keep factually incorrect information on Wikipedia when the up-to-date and correct information is readily available for the general public to read. Even "I am One of Many" agrees that this Rocket Records article about Elton John's old and now defunct Rocket Record Company should be moved under the heading and Wikipedia URL of Rocket Record Company. As for the current Rocket Records in existence that I had written about, we can submit that as a new article, although as I have now stated in great detail and documented to you all, it more than meets the proper notability standards for inclusion in Wikipedia. I will let everybody chime in on that though before I attempt to take any further action on the matter. Kinu, do you agree that this version of the Rocket Records article can me moved under the CORRECT Wikipedia URL and subject heading of Rocket Record Company? Your input on this subject is VERY important since you have final control over the Rocket Records page on Wikipedia right now. There will be no more "edit wars" I can assure you, as everbody interested is working toward the right consensus as a collective group. All decisions will firt be made by a consensus group of non-affiliated Wikipedia music editors before any more editing actions occur. All of us are hoping that you will fairly unlock the page for edits soon, as more editors have now started discussing it in detail on the Rocket Records talk page. Thank you.
First off, hello guys. Kinu is right eric, a simple link to the talk page is good enough! For future reference eric, please keep your frequent comments on talk pages to a brief summarization of the issue(s) at hand. However I can understand why eric felt compelled to write so much about the page in question since there were multiple "confusing" issues going on with it to say the least. At least it's good that there is finally some productive discussion going on at the Rocket Records talk page. Thanks for starting that discussion up kinu! One thing though, I would really like to see this page get tackled right now while it is "hot" and before the quality music contributors out there lose interest in it. I'm sure you know how these projects can go quite often kinu. SLOWWWW!!!! I have been helping to get the WikiProject Record Labels moving along at a decent pace, but it has been moving much slower than we'd like to see it move. Note to Kinu* - Please unlock the Rocket Records page immediately if you would be gracious enough to do so that I can personally start cleaning up the existing article's awful spelling, grammar, and references. I myself am not a wikipedia administrator anymore because of personal time constraints, so I cannot work on it due to your protection lock (which I understand you had to do). Everybody else be fully warned though that any major changes or controversial overwrites to the existing article will result in it being fully protected again! I'm sure that in quick time the existing article will be moved to its proper title and wikipedia url address as you are calling for eric, and then you can submit a brand-new article about the new Rocket Records label which I can see through a brief google search is highly active and very newsworthy at this moment as you have stated to us all lately. Let's keep the positive discussion going on the Rocket Records talk page everybody, and please remember that there are still many other record labels that we need to get quality music contributors working on for the WikiProject Record Labels. Let's really get the project rolling! Thanks again everybody! MusicLoverShawn (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Kinu, please go the Rocket Records talk page as soon as you are able to and read what I have written at the bottom of the page. I'm hoping that this issue is now finally resolved. I would greatly appreciate you commenting on it so we can proceed ahead, as we have many more record labels to log for WikiProject Record Labels. I went ahead and formally completed the process of an official page move request (which was quickly approved) for eric gregson because eric honestly did not know how to follow the proper page moving procedures. Anyway, please go to that page and quickly comment so that we can finalize this process once and for all. Thank you! P.S. - The existing article about the "old Rocket Records" (The Rocket Record Company) has been properly and officially moved to this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rocket_Record_Company MusicLoverShawn (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Eric has asked me to let you know that I believe the Elton John label should be at 'Rocket Record Company' and the new label at 'Rocket Records'. Regards, Rothorpe (talk) 14:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
|
full protection for Rocket Records
|
---|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The protection may be unnecessary now that all those accounts have been blocked. Please consider reducing or removing it. —rybec 03:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
|