Jump to content

Talk:Madonna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by IndianBio (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 11 December 2023 (New Infobox picture: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured articleMadonna is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMadonna has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
February 28, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
January 14, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 23, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 13, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
June 23, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
August 5, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
October 27, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
March 17, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
June 8, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
May 15, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
September 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 16, 2023.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2023

Madonna's name is actually Madonna Louise Veronica CicconeCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). 92.29.159.219 (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
cc @Paper9oll:; Madonna's legal name as far as we know is "Madonna Louise Ciccone", however, she uses the full "Madonna Louise Veronica Ciccone" in public as recently as 2022. Is there a precedent specifically to only have legal names in public? PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 14:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PHShanghai I deem this edit request as a controversial changes hence the above answer. If you disagree, you may overwrite it. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photos from the Celebration Tour?

Fans are already publishing their photos from the Celebration Tour and some of them looked really good. Since they are private individuals who have no interest in selling these photos, would it be crazy to ask them to donate their photos for her Wikipedia article? How would I exactly go about this? PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PHShanghai For future reference, you could ask them directly. Here are examples and this could be helpful maybe. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Infobox picture

I believe one of these could work :)

Christian (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this other example could be useful too. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The third one should be cropped and used in my opinion, she looks stunning! Johnny Gnecco (talk) 20:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My preference definitely is the third one (and I agree with Johnny Gnecco about cropping it) since that doesn't have a microphone in front of her face like the other options do. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I actually think that this photo (File:MadonnaO2171023 (115 of 133) (53269593417).jpg) is a better option too, cropped ofc Johnny Gnecco (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely have a preference for the fifth one; I don't really like the third one because she's pointing her head up and her nose looks kind of weird.
Having a microphone in front of her face isn't the worst, the current lead image has a microphone in front of her face. I think fifth has better hair and her makeup looks better because the lighting is warmer. PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here is what a cropped version of image six may look like. I quite like it! I think she looks great.
  • PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 00:48, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    I personally like 1, 3 and 5 --Christian (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Update, there are far more choices actually than just these images. If you go on Flickr, there are two photographers who basically were able to take pictures of the entire concert. I think this one is my favorite and I'll test it on the infobox right now; however, as we're still building consensus I think we can probably sift through the rest of the Flickr uploads and keep looking for the best one. It's just a lot of images to look through, like, a lot. PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    OMG I like the one you uploaded :D it works really well --Christian (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Aside from the microphone, I don't have any qualms with File:MadonnaO2171023 (5 of 133) (53270847219) (cropped).jpg myself, and yes indeed there are tons of pics available from Flickr! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I am more than happy to find another photo that doesn't have the microphone blocking some of her face.
    The only qualm I could have is some of the pics from the Ray of Light segment, she's higher up in her flying platform so the photos taken from that low angle make her look a little funny.
    I'm afk right now but when I get more time I can find an alternative, microphone-less picture on Flickr. PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, I changed it to a photo that has better lighting and that doesn't have the microphone as prominently in her face. I really like the lighting on it, but can someone tell me how to remove the ugly purple lighting bleeding in? Where can I consult someone on WM commons to help with that? PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You can request here those changes. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    (→) Guys, late response here but I definitely feel merit in File:Madonna - The Celebration Tour live London14 10 2023 (53272334700).jpg and with a little editing in Graphics Lab. @Chrishm21: thanks for uploading these pics. —IB [ Poke ] 14:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2023

    Guinness Book's updated sales of Madonna, over 400 million records Alarinaticos (talk) 19:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 22:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2023

    Change caption of the image under "2018–present: Madame X, catalog reissues, and the Celebration Tour": Madonna performing at the Madame X Tour in 2020 (Photo taken in February 2020) 219.77.73.137 (talk) 05:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Done, thanks for highlighting this. Karst (talk) 09:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2023

    Change “she sold 300 milioni records, to 400 millions”.

    According with Guinness world records.

    Source: https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2023/10/madonna-cements-status-as-biggest-selling-female-recording-artist-of-all-time-760147 5.90.133.121 (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. Better quality sources say 300 million. Binksternet (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/best-selling-female-recording-artist#:~:text=In%20her%20homeland%2C%20Madonna%20has,2%20multi%2Dplatinum%20singles%20awards.
    you can see it here 5.90.133.121 (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't doubt that Guinness published this. All I'm saying is that it's not as reliable as the many other sources saying 300 million. Binksternet (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2023

    Change “she sold 300 milioni records, to 400 millions”.

    According with Guinness world records.

    Source: https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2023/10/madonna-cements-status-as-biggest-selling-female-recording-artist-of-all-time-760147 5.90.133.121 (talk) 21:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Note that that source only supports the claim that Madonna CLAIMS to have sold 400 million records, not that she has actually done so. PianoDan (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Controversies

    Should there be a section about controversies Madonna has been involved in? Like accusations of child trafficking and stuff. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    @NintendoTTTEfan2005: the information is actually present in one of her articles, philantrophy and activism. Seems it was a claim made by the EWF and later by Candace Owens and met a bit of popularity in Twitter or some platforms. A demand for a "controversy" section seems have been requested here since mid '00s. The lack of the section might be comparable to the absecent of other sections like "public image", a little common in some pop stars and other public figures articles. But her public image/controversies is fragmented by areas (like Donald Trump), because she has "many" public image(s)/reception, evidenced by areas such as her gay icon status, fashion and more plus denoted by a response from multiple ideologies/interests and decades/clichés from popular press and other sectors. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 14:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Lets not use drivel by a despicable piece of shit like Candace Owens to try to engage an accusation piece on Madonna, when everything has proven to be the opposite of.
    IB [ Poke ] 14:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]