Jump to content

Mughal-e-Azam

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dwaipayanc (talk | contribs) at 00:16, 4 August 2012 (→‎Production: made clearer ;). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For the 2008 comedy film, see Maan Gaye Mughal-e-Azam.
Mughal-e-Azam
Theatrical poster showing Prince Salim hugging Anarkali
Theatrical poster
Directed byK. Asif
Written byAman
Kamal Amrohi
K. Asif
Wajahat Mirza
Ehsan Rizvi
Produced byShapoorji Pallonji
StarringPrithviraj Kapoor
Dilip Kumar
Madhubala
Durga Khote
CinematographyR. D. Mathur
Edited byDharamvir
Music byNaushad
Production
company
Sterling Investment Corporation
Release dates
5 August 1960
12 November 2004 (re-release)
Running time
191 minutes
177 minutes (re-release)
CountryIndia
Languages
Budget₹1.05 – 1.5 crores
Box office₹5.5 crores

Mughal-E-Azam ([The Greatest of the Mughals] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help)) is a 1960 Indian period epic film directed by K. Asif and produced by Shapoorji Pallonji under the banner of Sterling Investment Corporation. A retelling of a popular Indian tale, the film featured Prithviraj Kapoor, Dilip Kumar, Madhubala and Durga Khote in pivotal roles. Mughal-e-Azam loosely followed an episode in the life of the Mughal Prince Salim (who went on to become Emperor Jahangir), specifically his love for a court dancer Anarkali, which is disapproved of by his father, emperor Akbar, and envied by a superior dancer who wishes to be a queen. Both Salim and Anarkali refuse to part with each other, leading to a war between father and son which the latter loses. Salim's life is spared in exchange for Anarkali's, who is saved due to a past incident.

The development of Mughal-e-Azam began in 1944 when Asif read a play which was set in the reign of Emperor Akbar. The film underwent a troubled production, facing a number of problems and halts due to communal tensions and financial uncertainty, almost to the point of bankruptcy. Prior to the film's principal photography, which began in either 1951 or 1953, the film lost a financier and underwent a complete change in the cast. Upon completion, Mughal-e-Azam became the most expensive Indian film, to the extent that the filming of a single sequence cost more than the entire budget of a typical film. The film was also dubbed in Tamil as Akbar, but its commercial failure resulted in the abandoning of a planned English dubbing. The music director for the film's soundtrack was Naushad, and the lyrics were penned by Shakeel Badayuni. The music was heavily inspired from Indian classical and folk music. The soundtrack contained 12 songs, voiced by both playback singers such as Lata Mangeshkar, and classical music artists. It is often cited as one of the best soundtracks in Bollywood history.

Mughal-e-Azam witnessed the widest cinematic release for an Indian film at that time, and ticket sales often featured day-long queues and rioting in certain places. Upon release, the film created box office records in India, becoming the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time, a record it held for 15 years. Starting in 2003, Sterling Investment Corporation undertook a year-long initiative to restore the film in colour, a dream long harboured by Asif, and to digitize its soundtrack. The film's colour version was released in November 2004 and also became a commercial success despite facing competition from three other major films.

Mughal-E-Azam is widely considered a classic, and is often recognized as a milestone in Indian cinema. Contemporary critics unanimously praised the film, commenting on its cinematic quality, grandeur, cinematography and attention to detail. The film went on to win numerous accolades, notably one National Film Award and three Filmfare awards.

Plot

Emperor Akbar (Prithviraj Kapoor) and his Rajput wife, Jodha Bai (Durga Khote) pray for a son. Akbar offers rituals to initiate the birth of a successor. After a child is born, the news is brought to the emperor by a maid. Overjoyed at his prayers being answered, the Emperor gives to the maid his ring and promises to grant her any one wish she asks.

The son, Prince Salim, grows to be a weak and pleasure-loving boy. His father sends him off to war in order to teach him courage and discipline. After 14 years, Salim returns as a distinguished soldier (Dilip Kumar). Salim falls in love with Anarkali (Madhubala), a court-dancer. Salim wants to marry Anarkali and arranges secret meetings between her and himself. However, the jealous Bahaar (Nigar Sultana), a dancer of a higher rank, wants the crown of India and she attempts to make the prince love her so that she may ascend to queenship. Unsuccessful in winning Salim's heart, she exposes the love between him and Anarkali. Salim pleads for Anarkali's hand, but his father objects and throws Anarkali into prison. Despite imprisonment, Anarkali refuses to reject Salim.

Salim rebels and amasses his own army to confront Akbar. Salim is defeated in battle and is sentenced to death by his own father. Before his sentencing, Akbar's subjects spontaneously erupt into a gathering and plead before the Emperor to not kill his only son, and the Empire's only prince. Anarkali too pleads for Salim's life in exchange for her own, and is condemned to death by entombment alive. Before her sentence is carried out, she pleads to have a few hours alone with Salim as his make-believe wife. She is granted the wish, as she agrees to drug him afterwards so that he cannot interfere with her entombment. As she is being walled up, Akbar is reminded that he still owes a favour to Anarkali's mother, since she is the one to whom Akbar gave his ring after she informed him of the birth of his son. Anarkali's mother takes advantage of this, and begs for her daughter's life. The emperor relents, and arranges for Anarkali's secret escape into exile. Unfortunately for Salim, it is still announced that Anarkali was killed, and he is heartbroken.

Cast

  • Dilip Kumar as Prince Salim, a pleasure-loving youth who returns as a distinguished military man after being banished to the battlefield.
Asif had initially rejected Kumar for the role.[1] Kumar himself was reluctant towards the idea of acting in a period film, but he accepted the role upon the insistence of the film's producer.[2] According to Kumar, "Asif trusted me enough to leave the delineation of Salim completely to me".[3] Kumar visited London to test the wig he would wear in the film.[2] He faced significant difficulty while filming in Rajasthan due to the heat and the body armour he wore.[3]
  • Madhubala as Nadira, who is christened as Anarkali and becomes the court dancer after displaying impressive dancing abilities.
Though Madhubala had acted in a number of films and was considered to be in the "twilight" of her career, she was reported to have been longing for a significant role. When the author-backed character of Anarkali came to her, Madhubala reportedly "couldn't let it go."[4] The role of Anarkali had previously been offered to Suraiya.[1] Madhubala suffered significant difficulty while filming, primarily due to her congenital heart disease.[5] She is said to have fainted on the sets, and suffered skin abrasions while filming the prison sequences, but was reportedly dedicated to her work and not much concerned about her health.[6]
  • Prithviraj Kapoor as Emperor Akbar, a dutiful ruler and strict father who strongly disapproves of his son's romance.
To get into the skin of his character, Kapoor was reported to have "relied completely on the script and director",[7] and would look into a mirror as tall as himself before every shot.[8] Prior to the make-up, Kapoor would declare, "Prithviraj Kapoor ab jaa rahaa hai" ("Prithviraj Kapoor is now going"); after make-up, he would announce, "Akbar ab aa rahaa hai" ("Akbar is now coming"). Kapoor did face difficulty with his heavy armor, and suffered blisters on his feet after walking bare-footed on the desert for a particular sequence.[7]
  • Durga Khote as Empress Jodhabai, Salim's mother and Akbar's principal wife. Though she is a very loving and affectionate mother, she is distressed over her son's relationship.
  • Nigar Sultana as Bahar, a high-ranked court dancer who wishes to ascend to the throne.
  • Ajit as Durjan Singh
  • M. Kumar as Sangtarash, the royal sculptor.
  • Murad as Raja Man Singh.
  • Jillo Bai as Anarkali's mother.
  • Sheila Dalaya as Suraiya, Anarkali's sister.
  • Jalal Agha as Young Prince Salim. Tabla artist Ustad Zakir Hussain had initially been considered for the role.[8]

Other minor parts were portrayed by Vijayalaxmi, Khurshid Khan, Shah Gul, Jago, Syed Hussain, Khanna, S. Nazair, Khawaja Sabir, Mah Gul, Paul Sharma, Gulam Sabir, Surender, Johnny Walker, Tabassum and Gopi Krishna.[7]

Production

Development

In 1944, director K. Asif read a famed three-act stage-play titled Anarkali, written by Imtiaz Ali Taj in 1922. The play was set in the late sixteenth century, during the reign of Emperor Akbar, and revolved around the romance between a Prince and a commoner.[8][9] Asif decided to adapt the play into a film, and received financial backing from Shiraz Ali Ahmed. At that time, Asif cast Chandramohan, D.K. Sapru and Nargis for the roles of Salim, Akbar and Anarkali respectively.[7]

However, the project faced multiple hurdles which forced it to be abandoned. The political tensions and communal rioting surrounding India's partition and independence in 1947 stalled the film's production. Shortly after Partition, Shiraz Ali migrated to Pakistan, leaving Asif without a financier.[7] Subsequently, the film's lead Chandramohan suffered a heart attack and died in 1949.[10] Ali had previously suggested the name of business tycoon Shapoorji Pallonji for financing the film. Pallonji did not know anything regarding the production of films, but he took a keen interest in the project and agreed to produce it due to his strong interest in Akbar's history.[11] The film was re-started with the presently-known cast. Along with K. Asif, the Urdu script was developed as a team effort by Aman (Zeenat Aman’s father, also known as Amanullah Khan), Wajahat Mirza, Kamaal Amrohi, and Ehsan Rizvi.[7] It is not known how they collaborated or split up their duties, but the result is often likened to poetry.[12] Around the time of the pre-production of Mughal-e-Azam, a film named Anarkali (1953), based on the same stage play, was released.[8] That film, directed by Nandlal Jaswantlal, and starring Bina Rai and Pradeep Kumar, became the highest grossing Bollywood film of 1953.[13]

Design

The film's production design was very large scale and expensive, and was led by M. K. Sayed. Certain sets were reported to have taken six weeks to erect. The song "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kiya" ("I have loved, so what is there to fear?") was filmed in a set built as a replica of the Sheesh Mahal in the Lahore Fort, in the Mohan Studios. The particular set was noted for its size, measuring 150 feet in length, 80 feet in breadth and 35 feet in height.[7] A heavily-discussed aspect of the set was the presence of numerous small mirrors made of Belgian glass, which were crafted and designed by workers from Firozabad.[14] The sequence was reported to have cost ₹10 lakhs to execute, a price higher than the budget of an entire film at that time. The high cost increased fears that the financiers of the film would face bankruptcy.[2]

The film's costume design was undertaken by tailors from Delhi, with specialists from Surat-Khambayat executing the embroidery. In addition, the footwear was ordered from Agra, the jewellery made by goldsmiths in Hyderabad, and the crowns designed in Kolhapur.[2] A statue of Lord Krishna, to which Jodhabai prayed, was made of pure gold. In the scenes involving an imprisoned Anarkali, the chains Madhubala wore were authentic.[7] The battle sequence between Akbar and Salim featured 2,000 camels, 4,000 horses and 8,000 troops. A significant portion of the soldiers were taken from the Indian Army's Jaipur Regiment. The weapons used by the soldiers were crafted by Rajasthani ironsmiths.[2]

Principal photography

The principal photography of Mughal-e-Azam began in the early 1950s, with the exact year being disputed between 1951 and 1953.[2] Filming was done three times for every sequence, since the film was being produced as a trilingual of Hindi/Urdu, Tamil and English. The film was eventually dubbed in Tamil and released as Akbar;[15] but its commercial failure resulted in the abandoning of the planned English dubbing, for which British actors were considered.[2] Asif was accompanied by an extensive crew, which included his assistant directors Khalid Akhtar, Rashid Abbasi and Surinder Kapoor, the latter assisting primarily for the English version.[7] Additional crew members included: cinematographer R. D. Mathur, choreographer Lachhu Maharaj (famed Kathak dancer),[1] production manager Aslam Noori, project director Deepesh Salgia, editor Dharamavir, art director M. K. Syed, costume designers Jagi and B. N. Trivedi, makeup artists P. G. Joshi and Abdul Hamid, and sound director Akram Shaikh.[16]

Certain sequences of the film utilized 14 cameras, significantly more than the norm at that time. The film's lighting faced a number of difficulties, with cinematographer Mathur reported to have taken eight hours to light a single shot.[7] Due to the very large size of the Sheesh Mahal set, the lighting was obtained by using the headlights of 500 trucks. The presence of the mirrors in the set caused problems since they would sparkle under the lights. Consultants from Hollywood, including Sir David Lean, told Asif to abandon the idea since they felt that it was impossible to film the scene under the intense glare. Asif confined himself to the set with the lighting crew,[17] and subsequently overcame the problem by covering all the mirrors with a thin covering of wax, thereby getting rid of their reflective nature.[7] In addition, Mathur deployed a large number of reflectors to implement "bounce lighting", which reduced the glare.

"Such was the all-round commitment that nobody saw the delay as tiresome. We were experienced enough to know that a film involving such overwhelming craftsmanship, minute detailing, massive gathering of artistes and unit hands, strenuous schedules with large units of artistes and trained animals, day and night shoots cannot be a simple affair."[3]

Dilip Kumar, on the duration of filming

Filming suffered a number of problems and delays which forced an increase in the production duration, to the extent that Asif had decided to not complete the film at one point of time.[18] Kumar commented on the long time taken for principal photography to complete, but defended the duration due to the massive logistics of the film. He also stated that the entire cast and crew was "acutely conscious of the hard work [they] would have to put in, as well as the responsibility [they] would have to shoulder."[3]

The filming process also suffered from financial problems, with Asif reported to have gone over-budget a number of times.[1] The final budget of the film is a subject of debate, with some sources stating that Mughal-e-Azam cost ₹1.05 crores to produce, about $2 million at the time,[2][19] while others claim it to be ₹1.5 crores, or about $3 million.[7][5][20] This made Mughal-e-Azam the most expensive Indian film at that time; a number of estimates put the film's inflation-adjusted budget at ₹50 crores to ₹200 crores. The budget situation created major differences between Asif and Pallonji.[1] The production also faced troubled relationships among other crew members; differences crept up between Asif and Kumar when the former married the latter's sister.[1] However, the most prominent and well-documented trouble was the romantic relationship and ultimate break-up of Kumar and Madhubala.

Post-production

By the end of filming, over a million feet of negative was obtained, necessitating significant editing.[7] A number of songs were edited out of the film due to the running time. A song titled "Ae Ishq Yeh Sab Duniyawale", picturised on Sheila Dalaya, was cut from the film. Similarly, the song "Husn Ki Baraat Chali", which was sung by three playback singers, was removed from the film.[1] A scene during which Prince Salim visits the royal boathouse and distributes gifts was removed from the final cut; the song accompanying the scene was also removed.

Jhansi Ki Rani (1953) was the first colour film in India. By 1957, colour filming was gaining an increasing presence in Indian films. Asif filmed one reel in Technicolor (which included the song "Pyar Kiya to Darna Kya"). Impressed by the results, he filmed three reels near the film's climax in Technicolor. After seeing the results, he wanted to make the entire film in Technicolor, angering impatient distributors who were not willing to accept further delays. Asif subsequently released the film partially coloured, though he wished to see the full film in a colour version.

Music

Untitled

After conceiving the idea of the film, Asif visited renowned music director Naushad and handed him a briefcase filled with currency notes, telling him to make "memorable music" for Mughal-e-Azam. Offended by the explicit notion of money as means of gaining quality, Naushad threw the notes out of the window, a situation which attracted the attention of his surprised wife. She subsequently made peace between both of them, and Asif apologized for the "misunderstanding". With this, Naushad accepted the offer to direct the film's soundtrack.[21]

The lyrics were penned by Shakeel Badayuni, with the opening lyrics of "Mohe Panghat Pe" being composed by Thakur Prasad, the choreographer's grandfather.[1] As with most of Naushad's soundtracks, the soundtrack of Mughal-e-Azam was heavily inspired from Indian classical music and folk music, particularly the ragas such as the Raga Durbari, the Raga Durga, used for "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya",[22] and the Raga Kedar, used for "Bekas Pe Karam Keejeye".[23] The soundtrack contained a total of 12 songs, which were voiced by both playback singers and classical music artists.

No.TitleSinger(s)Length
1."Mohe Panghat Pe"Lata Mangeshkar and Chorus04:02
2."Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya"Lata Mangeshkar and Chorus06:21
3."Mohabbat Ki Jhooti"Lata Mangeshkar02:40
4."Humen Kash Tumse Mohabbat"Lata Mangeshkar03:08
5."Bekas Pe Karam Keejeye"Lata Mangeshkar03:52
6."Teri Mehfil Mein"Lata Mangeshkar, Shamshad Begum and Chorus05:05
7."Ye Dil Ki Lagi"Lata Mangeshkar03:50
8."Ae Ishq Yeh Sab Duniyawale"Lata Mangeshkar04:17
9."Khuda Nigehbaan"Lata Mangeshkar02:52
10."Ae Mohabbat Zindabad"Mohammed Rafi and Chorus05:03
11."Prem Jogan Ban Ke"Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan05:03
12."Shubh Din Aayo Raj Dulara"Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan02:49
Total length:49:02

Production

A total of 20 songs were composed for the film, at a cost of ₹3,000 per song, though many were left out of the final cut of the film.[17] Both Asif and Naushad approached Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan with the request of participating in the film's soundtrack, but the latter refused since he disliked working in films. Asif, adamant about the presence of Khan, asked him to name his fee. Khan quoted a fee of ₹25,000 per song (at a time when Mangeshkar and Rafi charged ₹300–₹400 per song), thinking that Asif would send him away. Instead, Asif agreed, and even gave Khan a 50% advance.[24] Surprised and left with no excuse to turn down the offer, he finally accepted.[25] In the film's final cut, a number of songs were deleted due to the length of the film.[17]

The composition of "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya" was especially time-consuming – on the day of the song's recording, Naushad rejected two sets of lyrics made by Badayuni. Subsequently, a "brainstorming session" was held on Naushad's terrace, beginning in early evening and lasting until next day.[7][8] Late in the night, Naushad remembered a folk song from eastern Uttar Pradesh with the lyrics going as "Prem kiya, kya chori kari hai..." ("I have loved, does it mean that I have stolen?"). The song was converted into a ghazal and subsequently recorded.[17] At that time, since there was no technology to provide for the reverberation of sound heard in the song, Naushad had Mangeshkar sing the song in a studio bathroom.[21] Some sources state that the song "Ae Mohabbat Zindabad" had singer Mohammed Rafi supported with a chorus of 100 singers,[7] though other sources place the number at a thousand.[1]

It is claimed that the song "Mohe Panghat Pe" was objected to by veteran director Vijay Bhatt, who was not directly involved with the project, since it spoke of the celebration of Janmashtami, an oddity since the song was depicted in the Mughal court. Though Naushad argued that the presence of Jodhabai made the situation logical, he met the film's screenwriters and subsequently added a dialogue which explained the sequence.[17]

At the time that the film was being colourized for re-release, the soundtrack was also reworked, with original composer Naushad receiving help from Uttam Singh. The score remained the same, but the sound was touched up and converted to Dolby Digital.[26] The orchestral part was re-recorded with live musicians, but the original solo vocals were retained.[7] The cost was reported to be between ₹26 Lakh and ₹65 Lakh.[26][7]

Reception

The soundtrack of Mughal-e-Azam received universal acclaim from critics in India, and is often cited as one of the best soundtracks in Bollywood history.[27] Shahid Khan, writing for Planet Bollywood, gave the soundtrack a perfect 10 out of 10 stars.[28] In 2004, Subhash K. Jha reviewed the re-mastered release of the soundtrack, praising the technical quality of the re-release, and the original vocals of Lata Mangeshkar, whom he called the "Indian nightingale".[29]

Release

"Asif’s logic was very clear – he had made a film which everyone associated with it would be proud of for generations. And he was proved right."[30]

K K Rai of Stardust, on Asif's quoted distributor prices.

At that time, a typical Bollywood film would garner a distribution fee of ₹3 lakhs–₹4 lakhs per territory. However, prior to the release of Mughal-e-Azam, Asif insisted on selling the film to the distributors at the rate of ₹7 lakhs per territory, making it clear that he would sell the film only as per his wish. Subsequently, the film was sold at a price of ₹17 lakhs per territory, surprising Asif and the producers. Thus, it set the record for the highest distribution fee received by any Bollywood film at that time.[30]

The premiere of Mughal-e-Azam was held at the then-new,[5] 1,100-capacity[31] Maratha Mandir theatre in Mumbai.[32] Mirroring the nature of the film, the theatre's foyer had been decorated to resemble a Mughal palace, and a 40-foot tall cut-out of Prithviraj Kapoor was erected outside it.[33] The Sheesh Mahal set was transported from the studio to the theatre, where ticket holders could go inside and experience its grandeur.[34] Invitations to the premiere were sent as "royal invites" shaped like scrolls, which were written in Urdu and made to look like the Akbarnama, the official chronicle of the reign of Akbar.[35] The premiere was held amidst great fanfare, witnessing large crowds and an extensive media presence, in addition to hosting the entire film industry,[7] though Dilip Kumar himself did not attend the event due to his dispute with Asif. The film's reels arrived at the premiere theatre atop a decorated elephant, accompanied to the beat of bugles[3] and shehnai.[5]

Box office

The day before the film's bookings opened, a reported crowd of 100,000 had gathered outside the Maratha Mandir to buy tickets.[7] The tickets, the most expensive for a Bollywood film at that time, were dockets containing text, photographs and trivia about the film, and are now considered collector's items.[36] Bookings witnessed major chaos and rioting, to the extent that police intervention was required. It was reported that people would wait in queues for four to five days, and would be supplied food from home through their family members.[25] Subsequently, the Maratha Mandir closed the bookings for three weeks.[7]

Mughal-e-Azam was released on 5 August 1960 in 150 theatres across the country, setting the record for the widest cinematic release for a Bollywood film at that time.[2] Upon release, it became a major commercial success, earning ₹40 lakh in the first week,[37] and eventually earning a nett revenue of ₹5.5 crores, generating a profit of ₹3 crores for the producers. Mughal-e-Azam also witnessed a long theatrical run, being screened to full capacity at the Maratha Mandir for three years.[33] The film thus became the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time[2] by surpassing Mother India (1957), and retained this record until Sholay (1975) surpassed its nett revenue.[5]

A number of sources have stated that Mughal-e-Azam is the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time if adjusted for inflation.[1] According to the online box office website Box Office India, the film's adjusted nett revenue would amount to ₹132.7 crores, ranking it as an "All-Time Blockbuster".[38] The trade magazine Box Office implemented a formula for adjusting box office collections, using the base price of gold and growth of multiplexes as factors, and calculated that Mughal-e-Azam is the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time.[39]

Critical reception

Mughal-e-Azam received nearly universal acclaim from Indian critics, with every aspect of the film receiving praise. A majority of them described the film as a classic,[8] calling it a "benchmark" and "milestone" in the history of Indian cinema.[3][40] Taran Adarsh of Bollywood Hungama said, "The grandiose look, the haunting musical score, the breathtaking battle scenes, the splendid performances, the heart-rending emotions, the legendary romance between Salim and Anarkali and of course, the confrontation scenes between Akbar and Salim? Mughal-e-Azam will always remain a benchmark."[40] Anupama Chopra included the film in her list of "Top 100 Films", writing "With its powerful performances, thunderous father-son drama and spectacular song-and-dance sequences, Mughal-e-Azam is the apotheosis of the Hindi film form."[41] Dinesh Raheja of Rediff called the film "a must-see classic," saying, "A work of art is the only phrase to describe this historical whose grand palaces-and-fountains look has an epic sweep and whose heart-wrenching core of romance has the tenderness of a feather's touch."[8] Sujata Gupta of Planet Bollywood gave the film 9 out of 10 stars, calling it a must see for young and old alike.[42]

K K Rai of Stardust, in a very positive review, stated: "It can be said that the grandeur and vintage character of Mughal-e-Azam cannot be repeated, and it will remembered as one of the most significant films made in this country."[30] Ziya Us Salam of The Hindu described Mughal-e-Azam as "a film you see not because you have not seen it, but simply because you cannot have enough of it!"[1] Raja Sen of Rediff compared the film to Spartacus (1960) and said, "Mughal-e-Azam is awesomely, stunningly overwhelming, a magnificent spectacle entirely free of CGI and nonlinear gimmickry, a gargantuan feat of... of... well, of Mughal proportions!"[43] Nasreen Munni Kabir, author of The Immortal Dialogue of K Asif's Mugahl-e-Azam, described the film as "the Kohinoor, the diamond that shines bright in popular cinema."[3] Laura Bushell of BBC rated the film four out of five stars, commenting, "A benchmark film for both Indian cinema and cinema grandeur in general, Mughal-E-Azam is epic in every sense of the word."[44]

In his essay in Ashis Nandy's book The Secret Politics of Our Desires: Innocence, Culpability and Indian Popular Cinema, Ziauddin Sardar said that the film is structured like a ghazal. Of the dialogues he said, "The characters of Mughal-e-Azam do not just speak — they refine communication, they distil it, they crystallize it into many-faceted gems, they make poetry of ordinary language."[45] Both Outlook and the Hindustan Times declared that the scene in which Salim brushes Anarkali with an ostrich feather was the "most erotic, sensuous scene in the history of Indian cinema."[4][46]

Accolades

Mughal-e-Azam received a number of nominations and awards. At the 1961 National Film Awards, the film won the National Film Award for Best Feature Film in Hindi.[47] In the 1961 Filmfare Awards, Mughal-e-Azam was nominated in seven categories:- Best Film, Best Director (Asif), Best Actress (Madhubala),[4] Best Playback Singer (Mangeshkar), Best Music (Naushad),[48] Best Cinematography (Mathur) and Best Dialogues (Aman, Wajahat Mirza, Kamaal Amrohi, and Ehsan Rizvi), winning the awards for Best Film, Best Cinematography and Best Dialogues.[49][50][51][52]

Colourization

The idea of colouring Mughal-e-Azam originated when Umar Siddiqui, managing director of the Indian Academy of Arts and Animation (IAAA), met representatives of the Shapoorji Pallonji group; the idea was further supported by Dilip Kumar in 2001.[7] To convince the company about the commercial viability of the project, the IAAA colourized a four-minute clip of the film and showed it to the Sterling Investment Corporation, which liked the result. Shapoorji Pallonji himself supported the idea, regretful of being unable to complete the original film in colour and thinking of the colourization as a tribute to Asif.[26]

black-and-white film scene above a colourized version of the same scene
A comparison between the original (above) and colourized version

However, the first step towards colourization was the restoration of the original negatives, which were in a poor condition due to extensive printing of the negative during the original theatrical release.[26] Major efforts were taken up for this process, since restoration was essential for the colourization.[53] The process involved cleaning the negative of fungal growth, restoring the portions which were damaged with pinholes, and re-instating missing parts in the frames. After the cleaning, each frame of the negative was scanned into a 10 megabytes-sized file, with the total number of frames numbering 300,000.[7] The restoration required significant labour and money to complete.[53]

To undertake the colourization, Siddiqui brought together a team of around 100 individuals, including computer engineers and software professionals, and organized a number of art departments. The entire project was co-ordinated by Deepesh Salgia, who partnered with a number of companies like Iris Interactive and Rajtaru Studios to execute the colourization.[7] The task was controlled and supervised by the producers, who received daily updates and reports about the progress.[26]

The process of colourization was preceded by extensive research. The art departments visited museums and read books to understand the typical colours of clothing worn at that time. Additionally, Siddiqui studied the technology used for the colourization of black-and-white Hollywood classics. The team also approached a number of people for guidance and suggestions, including Dilip Kumar, production designer Nitin Chandrakant Desai and a historian from the Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi.[26]

The colourization team spent 18 months to develop a software for colouring the frames, called "Effects Plus", which was designed to accept only those colours whose hue would match the shade of gray present in the original film. This ensured that the colours being added were as close to the real colour as possible;[53] the authenticity of the colouring was later verified when a costume used in the film was retrieved from a warehouse, and its colours were found to match the colourization in the film. Every shot was finally hand-corrected to perfect the look.[54] The actual colourization process took a further 10 months to complete.[53] The exact cost of the colourization is debated, with a wide variety of estimates ranging from ₹2 crores[55] to ₹10 crores, or more than the original cost to make the film.[26]

Re-releases

The film's colour version was released theatrically on 12 November 2004 in 150[7] prints across the country, 65 of which were in Maharashtra. For the release, the colour version was edited to a running time of 177 minutes, but the original running time was preserved for the home media release.[53] This release also included a digitization and reworking of the soundtrack, in which the original composer Naushad participated.[56] The theatrical release coincided with the Diwali weekend, with the film debuting against three other releases – Veer-Zaara, Aitraaz and Naach. It became the 19th highest grossing Bollywood film of the year, behind Aitraaz and Veer-Zaara (the top grosser), but ahead of Naach.[57]

Mughal-e-Azam thus became the first full-length feature film in the history of world cinema to be colourized for a theatrical re-release (some Hollywood films were colourized, but only for release on home media). It was then selected for seven international film festivals.[7] Upon release, the film witnessed full shows at the theatres,[3] with an overall occupancy of 90%. Subsequently, the film completed a 25-week run at the theatres, and witnessed a theatrical run for over 100 days in a significant number of theatres. Kevin Thomas of the LA Times remarked that while colourizing is not a good idea for most black-and-white classics, it was perfect in this particular instance. He compared it to films by Cecil B. DeMille, and to Gone With the Wind (1939) for its larger-than-life storytelling.[20]

In 2006, Mughal-e-Azam became only the fourth film certified for showing in Pakistan since the 1965 ban on Indian cinema, releasing in the country with a premiere in Lahore.[58] It was distributed in the country by Nadeem Mandviwala Entertainment, at the request of K. Asif's son, Akbar Asif.[59] A 3D version of the film was reported to have been planned as of 2009.[1]

Legacy

Mughal-e-Azam remained one of only two films K. Asif ever directed, and one of his unfinished films was released posthumously as a tribute.[2] It is often regarded as the "crowning glory" of Madhubala's career. After this film, she could have had the best of roles, but was advised not to overwork due to her heart condition, and was unable even to finish some films that were underway.[8][60] It is said that name of film itself has become a part of the Bollywood vernacular, with the words Mughal-e-Azam often being heard on sets of modern films. For example, if a craftsman takes longer than necessary on a job, the impatient art director may say something like "Finish quickly, do you think we are making Mughal-e-Azam?" This is a testament to the passion that went in to making the film.[36] Art director Omung Kumar, who has designed sets for major Indian films such as Black (2005) and Saawariya (2007) said that he and others in his field even today look up to Mughal-e-Azam as a source of inspiration when it comes to art direction.[61] The film has also been used as a model for the perfect love story in the years that followed. As a result, many directors have been pressured not to make a love story where there is no barrier coming between the lovers.[36]

Filmmaker Subhash Ghai was quoted as saying that a film like this could never be repeated. "Mughal-e-Azam is an all-time classic and has been the ultimate love story in Hindi cinema at all levels. So it will always remain alive for generations to come."[61] Also to commemorate the anniversary, actor and producer Shahrukh Khan, who is a fan of the film and a friend of Akbar Asif, had his company Red Chillies Entertainment produce a documentary on the film. It was called Mughal-E-Azam — A Tribute by a son to his father; it included interviews with K. Asif's family and Bollywood stars, and was hosted by Khan himself.[62][63] In connection with the video, artist M. F. Husain created a series of paintings re-imagining some of the memorable scenes.[64] Khan is also interested in preserving the film for future generations, and noted that his father was originally cast in the film, but did not complete it. When asked if Mughal-e-Azam should be remade he replied no, adding that "It is the mother of all films; mothers cannot be remade".[65][66] Though no sequels have been made, the film Maan Gaye Mughal-e-Azam (2008), paid tribute by including in its plot a portion of the stage play, and of course with its name. It received very poor ratings from critics.[67]

Mughal-e-Azam often ranks on lists of top Indian films, such as the 2002 British Film Institute poll of "Top 10 Indian Films",[68] and Anupama Chopra's 2009 list, "The Best Bollywood Films".[69] As of 2012, the film had a 100% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with an average rating of 8.5 out of 10.[70]

Books

  • The Immortal Dialogue of K. Asif’s Mughal-E-Azam, by Nasreen Munni Kabir, Suhail Akhtar, with a foreword by Javed Akhtar. October 2006. ISBN 978-0-19-568496-4
  • Mughal-e-azam, by Shakil Warsi. Rupa & Company, 2009. ISBN 81-291-1321-X

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Us Salam, Zia (31 July 2009). "Mughal-e-Azam (1960)". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Burman, Jivraj (7 August 2008). "Mughal-e-Azam: reliving the making of an epic". Indo-Asian News Network. Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Sinha, Meenakshi (5 August 2010). "50 years on, Dilip Kumar remembers magnum opus Mughal-e-Azam". Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  4. ^ a b c Sharma, Rohit (13 February 2011). "Still our Valentine". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ a b c d e V Gangadhar (29 October 2004). "A classic resurrected in true colours". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 29 June 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  6. ^ Kohli, Suresh. "Timeless appeal". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Vijayakar, Rajiv (6 August 2010). "Celluloid monument". The Indian Express. Retrieved 12 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Check |archiveurl= value (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h Raheja, Dinesh (15 February 2003). "Mughal-e-Azam: A work of art". Rediff. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  9. ^ Heidi Rika Maria Pauwels (2007). Indian Literature and Popular Cinema: Recasting Classics. Routledge. pp. 123, 125, 130. ISBN 978-1-134-06255-3. Retrieved 22 June 2012.
  10. ^ "How well do you know Mughal-e-Azam?". Rediff. 5 August 2010. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  11. ^ Us Salam, Zia (31 July 2009). "Saga of all sagas". The Hindu. Retrieved 12 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Check |archiveurl= value (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  12. ^ 31 July 2010, 11.00am IST (31 July 2010). "Where every line was a piece of poetry... - Times Of India". Articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 3 July 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ "Box Office 1953". Boxofficeindia.com. Retrieved 25 July 2012.
  14. ^ "Is it sunset for Bollywood's magnificent 'sets'?". The Indian Express. 17 July 2011. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  15. ^ "Originally Dubbed in Tamil". Indiaglitz. 13 May 2010. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  16. ^ "Mughal-E-Azam - Cast, Crew, Director and Awards - NYTimes.com". Movies.nytimes.com. 5 June 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  17. ^ a b c d e "Mughal-e-Azam turns 50". Hindustan Times. 5 August 2010. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  18. ^ Raheja, Dinesh (5 August 2010). "Mughal-e-Azam revisited". Rediff. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  19. ^ Special to The New York Times. (6 August 1960). "Movie Review - Mughal-E-Azam - INDIAN FILM OPENS:' Mughal-Azam,' a Spectacle, in More Than 200 Theatres - NYTimes.com". Movies.nytimes.com. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  20. ^ a b "Adding some polish to the grandeur - Los Angeles Times". Articles.latimes.com. 1 April 2005. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  21. ^ a b "Music mogul" (Registration required). Hindustan Times. Highbeam. 2 June 2007. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  22. ^ "The last Mughal of film music" (Registration required). Hindustan Times. Highbeam. 6 May 2006. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  23. ^ "The breath of God blows through music" (Registration required). Hindustan Times. Highbeam. 30 March 2007. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  24. ^ Mughal-e-Azam documentary by Sterling Investment Corporation. From 10:52 to 12:45.
  25. ^ a b Patsy N (10 November 2004). "The making of Mughal-e-Azam". Rediff. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 23 June 2012.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g Firdaus Ashraf, Syed (29 October 2004). "Coloring a classic" (Registration required). India Abroad. Highbeam. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
  27. ^ Lall, Randy. "100 greatest soundtracks ever". Planet Bollywood.
  28. ^ Khan, Shahid. "Mughal-e-Azam". Planet Bollywood. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  29. ^ K Jha, Subhash (11 November 2004). "Mughal-e-Azam music review". Indo-Asian News Network. Nowrunning. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  30. ^ a b c K K Rai (4 January 2008). "Mughal-e-Azam (1960)". Stardust. Retrieved 24 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  31. ^ Parthasarathy, Anand (6–19 November 2004). "The colour of profit". Frontline, Volume 21 - Issue 23. Archived from the original on 26 June 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  32. ^ Karmalkar, Deepa (11 September 2010). "Mughal-e-Azam, 50 years later". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  33. ^ a b "Mughal-e-Azam mural at 24 Karat". Sify. 2 November 2004. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  34. ^ Gulzar; Govind Nihalani; Saibal Chatterjee (2003). Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema. Popular Prakashan. p. 221. ISBN 978-81-7991-066-5. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
  35. ^ Sethia, Shruti (5 November 2004). "Mughal-e-Azam dazzles... again". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  36. ^ a b c Imtiaz Ali (31 July 2010). "The lasting Mughal". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  37. ^ Mughal-e-Azam documentary by Sterling Investment Corporation. From 17:11 to 17:41.
  38. ^ "Top earners 1960-1969 (figures in ₹)". Box Office India. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
  39. ^ "Blockbusters decoded". Mumbai Mirror. The Times of India. 1 November 2011. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  40. ^ a b Adarsh, Taran (11 November 2004). "Mughal-e-Azam". Bollywood Hungama. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 1 January 2012.
  41. ^ Chopra, Anupama. "Mughal-E-Azam (1960)". Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  42. ^ "Bollywood — Film Review — Mughal-E-Azam". Planetbollywood.com. 20 August 1996. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  43. ^ Sen, Raja (12 November 2004). "Immortal-e-Azam". Rediff. Archived from the original on 24 June 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  44. ^ Bushell, Laura (11 October 2002). "Mughal-e-Azam (The Mogul) (1960)". BBC. Archived from the original on 25 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012.
  45. ^ Ashis Nandy (1998). The Secret Politics of Our Desires: Innocence, Culpability and Indian Popular Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 24–30. ISBN 978-1-85649-516-5. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
  46. ^ Outlook (magazine). 13-19, May 2008. p. 54. Retrieved 22 August 2011. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  47. ^ "8th National Film Awards" (PDF). International Film Festival of India. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
  48. ^ "Naushad: Composer of the century". rediff.com. 8 May 2006. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  49. ^ "Filmfare Nominees and Winners" (PDF). Deep750.googlepages.com. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  50. ^ "Filmfare Award Winners 1961 - 8th (Eighth) Filmfare Popular Awards". Awardsandshows.com. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  51. ^ "Filmfare Best Cinematography Award - Filmfare Award Winners For Best Cinematography". Awardsandshows.com. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  52. ^ "Filmfare Awards 1961 (List of Award Winners and Nominees)". Whosdatedwho.com. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  53. ^ a b c d e "The colourful re-entry of Mughal-e-Azam". India Syndicate. Sify. 6 October 2004. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  54. ^ K Jha, Subhash (2 November 2004). "Mughal-e-Azam goes colour". Sify. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  55. ^ Doval, Nikita (23 November 2004). "Mughal-e-Azam, reel link to past". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  56. ^ Asthana, Arun (5 August 2004). "Technology | Bollywood classics go colour". BBC News. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  57. ^ "Box Office 2004". Boxofficeindia.com. Retrieved 25 July 2012.
  58. ^ "'Mughal-E-Azam' censored in Pakistan". Sify.com. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  59. ^ Social Post (23 April 2006). "Mughal-e-Azam releases in Pakistan: will others follow suit?". News.oneindia.in. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  60. ^ "Madhubala: a sweet seduction". Rediff.com. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  61. ^ a b New Delhi, 5 Aug (IANS). "Fifty years on, 'Mughal-e-Azam' still inspires awe". Deccanherald.com. Retrieved 2 July 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  62. ^ "King Khan makes documentary on Mughal-E-Azam, Entertainment - Bollywood". Mumbai Mirror. 18 February 2011. Retrieved 3 July 2012.
  63. ^ "Mughal E Azam - A Tribute from a son to his father". uk.startv.com. Retrieved 3 July 2012.
  64. ^ Mumbai, 25 Feb, (IANS) :. "M.F. Husain revives 'Mughal E Azam' through paintings". Deccanherald.com. Retrieved 3 July 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  65. ^ Afsana Ahmed, TNN 25 February 2011, 12.44pm IST (25 February 2011). "SRK dons new role with Mughal-E-Azam - Times Of India". Articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 3 July 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  66. ^ "Classics like 'Mughal-e-Azam' cannot be remade: SRK". Indian Express. 25 February 2011. Retrieved 3 July 2012.
  67. ^ "Review: Maan Gaye Mughall-e-Azam". Hindustan Times. 22 August 2008. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  68. ^ "Top 10 Indian Films". British Film Institute. 2002. Archived from the original on 15 May 2001. Retrieved 12 July 2012. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 15 May 2011 suggested (help)
  69. ^ Anupama Chopra (24 February 2009). "The Best Bollywood Films". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  70. ^ "Mughal E Azam". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 1 July 2012.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mughal-e-Azam&oldid=505661964"