User talk:Titoxd
Welcome to my Talk Page! Administrative
Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Also, if you come to attack other user, read this first. Thank you. Article formattingJust curious, do you think we should send a message to all tropical cyclone users about the proper formatting for an article? If we explain clearly how to better existing articles, maybe people would know more of what to do. Simply having it on the Wikiproject page might not have enough of an audience. I was thinking something like this. Some things might be debatable, like the dissipation box on the infobox, so feel free to tweak it.
Does something like that work? Hurricanehink (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
IvanMy intent over on Ivan past few edits was to split it up into every conceivable section- to make sure when the editing to reduce the storm section occurs no content is lost. Obviously the article is far too split up at the moment - a lot of the sections will go, but when they get remerged we know the content is in the right sections. How long do you think the storm history should be and should those subsections of it go? --Nilfanion (talk) 23:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
User:Yagrebu roevertUser:Yagrebu roevert has again commited vandalism by clearing his talk page, which contained warnings. I suggest a ban. --Bayyoc 02:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC) Highway's RfAThank you for supporting/objecting/tropicanising me in my request for Adminship. Although I wasn't promoted to admin status, with a final vote count of 14/27/12, I am very happy with the response I received from my fellow Wikipedians. I was pleasantly suprised at the support, and was touched by it. I will also work harder on preventing disputes and boosting my edit count (which is on the up), so thank you to all your objectors. Hopefully I will re-apply soon and try again for the mop. Thanks again, Highway Rainbow Sneakers Anti-VandalismThanks for reverting my userpage! The vandals must really like me. :P Excuse me now while I enlarge my ego. Cheers and thanks again, Mopper Speak! 05:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
FIcelloguyToolHi Titoxd, remember me? We had a conversation on IRC, at #editcounters about FIcelloguyTool and another Java application (my project). You mentioned that there was someone already working on the SOAP API, but I forgot his name. Could you remember me, please? Best regards, Nuno Tavares 13:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
RfA Thank You!Thanks Titoxd, I am honored by your support in my recent successful request for adminship. As an administrator, I am your servant, ready to help however I can. (In your case, since you've had the tools longer than I, my best use might be menial labor!) My talk page is always open; should you need anything, or should you see me making a mistake -- probably a common occurrence -- please do let me know. I will depend on the good sense of the community to keep me from making a complete fool of myself! :) In gratitude, Xoloz 17:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC) PS. If I can be of any help in urging Mr. Parham to the RfA gauntlet, let me know -- I've already offered to nominate him myself, as has just about everybody, I think! Single-user login conflict searchSee User talk:Interiot#Toolserver corruption... I implemented the search idea... let me know if that's what you were looking for. --Interiot 20:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC) PD or fair use?I'm still new to the fair use idea, but would images at this site qualify as fair use, PD, or are they not even allowed? They are part of the National Weather Service site, which would make them PD, though they are taken by a fireman (US employee=PD) and 2 other people. What would the copyright status be on one of those tornado images? Thanks for the anticipated help. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
EsperanzaI have just joined the group, and are glad that you are one of the leading lights. I can remember you saying something about Mexicans being called vandals, when I was whinging on about being called one myself. That gave me a good laugh. I think we are probably on a similar wavelength, and I would like to help out. I see a few other level headed types there too. Wallie 17:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC) A smile for you Randy Johnston has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! More Smiling —G.He has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! AyudaHola, te he visto activo en w:es, y me di cuenta que eras administrador, y me podías ayudar con algo, (espero que así sea), mi problema es trasladar esta plantilla Template:Harvard reference, ya que en w:es no existe una plantilla especial para colocar fuentes provenientes de Internet, pero allí esta el problema, no se por donde comenzar, le doy editar y pienso que será pan comido pero ya tengo 30 minutos tratando de que “encaje” allá, lo cual me ha sido imposible, me preguntaba si es que este es tu campo, que la trasladaras para w:es, como Plantilla:Ref-internet, ¿Qué dices?. Saludos --Oscar 07:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
WikificarTome en cuenta tu sugerencia de redireccionar el articulo es:Wikificar a es:Wikipedia:Wikificar, y aun pienso que debe borrarse el articulo es:Wikificar. Habiendo hecho eso, espero que reconsideres tu voto. Saludos --Icoyocayan 10:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Please help on MathematicsPosted by Pruneau 21:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team Merci beaucoup!
Re: What's going on in here?OK, here's the story. About a week ago, Icelandic Hurricane took a page Hurricanecraze32 was working on in his user space and published it without Hurricanecraze's permission. (The article was Matthew). Hurricanecraze got angry at Icelandic Hurricane, and Icelandic Hurricane said he would change it to make it look different. Then, yesterday (or 2 days ago), Icelandic Hurricane took another page Hurricanecraze32 was working on in craze's userspace and published it, again without his permission. The article was Bonnie (1986). I told Icelandic hurricane that was mean. He said to me that he would change it. Hurricanecraze wanted the article to be merged and for Icelandic hurricane to be punished. I said it shouldn't be merged, as you don't own articles. And that's where we are right now. I think the whole thing is childish, and both should apologize for being childish about it. Hopefully you can push some sense into them. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Opening up WP:V0.5NHi Tito, I submit my final grades tonight, so my teaching commitments are formally over till July (summer school) and I will have a bit more time for Wikipedia. I was thinking of opening up WP:V0.5N (and therefore WP:V0.5) on Thursday, what do you think? Will you be around to help if we get any problems? I will contact Maurreen and Wizzy directly as well. Cheers, Walkerma 02:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Hello again, thanks as usual for your prompt reply. By all means submit a nomination! I have a couple of detail questions about the templates we'll be using with V0.5.
Actually, I definitely wouldn't want articles added to V0.5 by a bot either, I simply meant something equivalent to the log that could list any discrepancies. A human could then make adjustments to the main list as needed (as Cedars does at GA). I suspect for that aspect we don't need make big changes to Mathbot, we could approach the GA folks (specifically User:Cedars) to see if they could adapt GAAuto (which I think may be this perl script) to generate a log for us. I don't think we need do this immediately, in fact we probably only really need it to be done once after nominations have closed. For Mathbot, I'm most interested in it generating statistics, a log, and "by quality" tables. I realise that many articles may be unassessed, but with WVWP we will be pushing the idea of using the bot assessments anyway, so hopefully we can get at least 1000 or so of the articles carrying assessments in their banners (mostly A or FA class, probably, though some B-Class too if they are decent and very important topics). I think it would be useful to flag any quality changes on the V0.5 articles after inclusion, for example if an article goes from A down to B we may want to re-evaluate it, or opt to use an older version. I'm also thinking to the future - I am still hoping we can get Mathbot to generate some trees with a huge amount of metadata on one screen (e.g., instead of the ubiquitous blue article link, the links could be colored based on their assessment, with automatic updating by Mathbot). This could be invaluable once we start having to browse through tens of thousands of articles for WP1.1 (next year?). By that time it may be that many articles will have been assessed using the S/S/B/A scheme. I think we may as well start using the bot early on. What do you think? Walkerma 03:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC) EWS23's RfA and a barnstar for you! Hi Tito! Thank you for your strong support of my requests for adminship. I realize we didn't get a chance to do much admin coaching, but it's been a pleasure getting to know you, and I hope we get to work together more in the future. Through your actions and your words, you've been highly dedicated to helping future admins on their path. For that, I award you this barnstar. Thanks, and if you ever see anything that I could be doing better, please let me know! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 04:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC) AOL IP blockIs it possible to unblock just 152.163.100.199 ? Amongst all the recent vandalism, I've seen just this IP making good edits. Kevin 04:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Hello, person who was at the top of Special:LogsI've placed two civility warning on a user's talk page *cough* Tony *cough* and he's removed them as "trolling" and "silliness," although I also used the "please don't remove warnings" template. There's some discussion at my talk about it if you'd care to look, but the short version is I'd prefer the warnings to be replaced. Same reason we always want warnings to stay: They are for everyone else as well as the person who's been warned. Conversly, if you look it over and tell me I'm just being a pain, I'll listen. brenneman {L} 04:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Sanity check requestThis is the price you pay for being reasonable. Am I being monomaniacal in this thread? - brenneman {L} 02:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Vandal BlockHello, I was wondering if you can block User:144.132.169.197 again because they keep on vandalisng the Nikki Webster article. They have gotten the vandalism warnings because in one of the edits to Nikki Webster they said "I'm not scared of not editing haha, I'm doing this for a good reason". Please block this user again. :). Lillygirl 8:20, 24 May 2006 ThanksThanks Titoxd for reverting the vandalism on my RfA. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Thank you.Thanks, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 22:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC) IPs at hurricane articlesI see you've noticed the IPs at the hurricane talk pages too. I s-protected the Pacific page yesterday. These IPs don't even go to the extent of including a "User:" in their sigs, how unprofessional :P NSLE (T+C) at 03:09 UTC (2006-05-27) ArquitesHola amigo Titoxd, me permito escribirte porque he reeditado totalmente el articulo Arquites, sobre el cual existe una consulta de borrado, me gustaría invitarte a leer los cambios para que en el caso de que te parezcan bien, reconsideraras tu voto. Gracias--81.0.33.141 18:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC) Firmado Clarasemp en la wiki en español Thanks! Hi Tito, I just wanted to take a few moments to thank you for all of your hard work at Wikipedia 1.0 that has made everything run more smoothly. Your work at WP:WVWP, help with organising the bot, setting up the V0.5 pages, and countless other things has made life a lot easier for all of us associated with the project. I honestly think that without your help we couldn't even have considered getting WP:V0.5 started. Thanks a lot! Walkerma 05:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC) Thank you for your comments in Lar's RfA!
New Idea for 0.5 Version Nominations reviewingHey, I made a layout for my idea of reviewing at User:Chcknwnm/Sandbox. If you think it's appropriate it should probably go to Wikipedia:Version 0.5 Nominations/Reviews. Anyway, let me know what you think, and feel free to say that it will cause too much extra work or isn't appropriate for this project...just looking for feedback. I'll send this message to all the current reviewers to get their imput. Later, Chuck(척뉴넘) 06:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Please ban vandals!It would be a great help if you could ban people(their IPs are obviously seen in the page history) that keep vandalising my userpage. Thanks, Earth KING (Talk) 23:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Thanks.Thanks for fixing my logic error. I felt kind of funny for a while... Ral315 (talk) 01:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Sorry for not posting anything, especially on something linked to from the main page, but I've never seen the job que at anything other than 0. It would seem to me that if it was ever utilized, we'd all be swamped in things to do. But I don't know. Is there something I don't know? -Mysekurity [m!] 02:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
About {{hurricane}}Sorry, didn't mean to cause any trouble. But it might happen again(not by me) because it looks redundant. Thanks. TimL 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC) wtf - I'm the juggernaut bitchthat article is not afd, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#The_Juggernaut_Bitch
An article can not be on afd and drv at the same time Mineralè 06:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC) The Juggernaut Bitch and AfDFrom what I was reading in the DRV it was re-re nominated for deletion. I was approaced by an editor who wanted to improve the article a bit, I guess the AfD I thought was there (and I guess I didn't check being a tad tired) - thanks for re-opening the AfD - it just seemed to need some second looks -- Tawker 06:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC) (now that I've found the correct page I'll repost here :) -- Tawker 07:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Article formattingDear Tropical cyclone editor, As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.
Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC) RE: FW BarnstarThanks for that! I always try my hardest. Hurricanehink (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC) ATLAS 0.5 nomHi Titoxd. If you'll forgive me for having a bit of ego wrapped up in a main page article that I wrote almost all of by myself, can I ask why you removed ATLAS experiment from the 0.5 nomination list? It didn't fail the "significant topics" criterion, did it? ;-) Maybe what I ought to say is that if there are any concrete suggestions on the article I'd be happy to work on them. -- SCZenz 15:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Technicalities of edit conflicts...is something I have never quite grasped. You just said they only occur when two people edit the same line. So why do we conflict if two people try to add a comment to the same section on e.g. a popular thread on AN/I? Or do we only conflict when two people try to add a new comment to the bottom, thus editing the same, if non-existent 'next' line? -Splashtalk 23:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Physics and Vital articles, Wikipedia 0.5/1.0, etc.Hi Titoxd. Your comments have inspired me to look around a little bit at the various suggestions for fundamental articles in physics, and although I support projects like this I have a problem I wanted to run by you... Many of our physics editors are professional physicists, and most of those who aren't are still interested primarily in current research topics. You might be able to imagine that bringing an article like weight up to featured status is a lot less interesting to most of us than something that relates to our current research. Wikipedia:Vital articles has no topics that I'd consider even close to current research; it doesn't even include basic areas of physics with a fair amount of popular awareness, like General Relativity, String theory, particle physics, or most other topics found in {{Physics-footer}}. Do you think it's the vital lists that need to be expanded, or is the 2nd half of the 20th century just not core encyclopedia material? -- SCZenz 07:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
A haiku of thanks
You are an editor that I respect the highest amount, and I am really honored to have your support. Thanks for all your nice comments in your support vote, and thanks again! -- Natalya 03:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #1The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the activities of the WikiProject over the past month and upcoming events over the next month. In addition monthly tropical cyclone activity will be summarized. You have received this as you are a member of the WikiProject, please add your username in the appropriate section on the mailing list. If you do not add your name to that list, the WikiProject will assume you do not wish to receive future versions of The Hurricane Herald. Storm of the month  Other tropical cyclone activity
New and improved articles
New articles and improvements wanted
Member of the month The May member of the month is TitoXD. The WikiProject awards this to him for his brilliant work in improving articles. TitoXD joined the WikiProject in October just after it had been founded. Since then he has contributed substantially to many articles, for example Hurricane Nora (1997), which is currently a Featured Article Candidate. He is also actively involved in the assessment of articles and so helps to improve many more articles. Explanation of content If you have a topic which is not directly related to any specific article but is relevant to the WikiProject bring it up on the Newsletters talk page, and it will probably be included in a future edition of The Hurricane Herald. These two sections are decided by the community on the newsletter's talk page:
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
The assessment scale
CongratulationsCongrats, Mr. WPTC Member of the Month. :P NSLE (T+C) at 00:55 UTC (2006-06-04)
V0.5 article reviews, and WVWPHi, I'm back from CIT, it went well, we had around 80 attendees for our panel on Wikis. I agree that this idea is nice, but I think we need to clarify who will assess what. At present I assess things I feel I can, or things I like, and that doesn't always fit with what people may think I can do. I want to make sure we get articles assessed at a decent rate - but then again having a specific list may actually encourage some to review more, I don't know. I certainly think it would be nice to set up:
What do you think? I'm going to bed now, but I'd like to start contacting WikiProjects for a second time this week. Can you think how to word the message, and I'll also give my views on it tomorrow night, at Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Work_via_Wikiprojects#The_next_postings. Walkerma 06:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Yes, the disputes page should certainly do that too. What should be done if someone gets upset about their nomination being rejected - just say, "Judges decision is final," or "Send it to the Second Opinion page" or "Discuss it on the Disputed page?" What system (if any) should we have for such appeals? Oh, and I meant to say, for 0.5 I think it should be fine for us to review outside our areas of expertise, we can put in more formal requirements for V1.0 (for which the review process is much more rigorous). The second opinion page would be a simple way to handle our apprehension on this for now. Thanks, Walkerma 07:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC) I'd put Sandy on hold. I hate to put FAs like this on hold, but this isn't Babe Ruth or Jackie Robinson, who perhaps do deserve to sit alongside Wayne Gretsky on the CD. Perhaps I'm not the best choice for second opinion, though - if I'm wrong and Sandy is in the most notable 6 or so baseball players of all time, and an FA, then he should go in. I suspect he will get on a later version. Walkerma 05:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC) AA + quality of article scaleThanks for the idea ... would you help me in tweaking the data. Maybe like 0-3, start ... 3-5, stub ... 5-7, b-class ... 7-8, GA ... 8-10 a-class or it just can't be used that way. Lincher 03:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Question answeredHi. I've answered your question. In it, I assumed you meant "non-Bureaucrats" where you wrote "non-admins". And sorry for the long statement :) Cheers, Redux 12:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC) My RFA Want to ask you rather than publicly. I think I'm getting to the point where I could coach others. Is it presumptuous of me, do you think, to remove my name from the coachee list and add it to coach even though I was never coached? (and am I wrong to think I am getting to that point?) Thoughts? Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 22:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Found Something or just to let you knowThe word neglection exists, I found it in the dictionary. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=neglection 24.188.203.181 03:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Poll on footnotesYou are right. I posted my rsp and modified the proposal accordingly. I don't consider it a procedural vio since it is a trivial issue, and since the same end result will be feasible by your global variable proposal. Actually, personally I wouldn't mind if it was dropped alltogether. If you have no other objections, I'd appreciate changing your vote. Thanks for the input and the global idea of working around this detail! NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 10:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC) WPTC importance catsAs I commented on the WPTC talk page I noted Mathbot was noting importance now, so I expanded the hurricane template and made cats for it. However thinking about it now, I am not sure if I got the cats right. I put them in as extra sub-cats of Category:Tropical cyclone articles by quality. Seeing as you are an admin with intimate knowledge of both WPTC and 1.0, it seems obvious to ask you to double check to see if I got the layout right (and correct if I haven't). I suppose we will know for sure if tomorrows log shows Mathbot noticing that Top-Class has been assigned to talk:Tropical cyclone.--Nilfanion (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Time for another to coachNow that EivindFOyangen is basically gaining more experience, I think I can take on someone else for admin coaching. I think there are a few admins on the coaches list not assigned, and might be an idea to start 'pruning' the requests list using the new rules, to try and get this moving a little bit. I can help out if you want with that, but as you're officially the coordinator I'll let you have the first bash if you want :) Petros471 16:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
DestructionVandal that you are, I have of course indefinitely blocked you for this edit. So you might want to make a second attempt at it... :) Splash - tk 05:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC) I am guessing that the barnstar on this user page, which claims to have been awarded by you, is a fake. Just thought you might want to know. Cheers TigerShark 18:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Protection of cite webHi Titoxid. May I ask you to unprotect {{cite web}}? Semi-protection is sufficient. I would agree to a hard move protection. But there is currently no need to protect that from editing by established accounts. We had some forths and backs recently but that has been settled. There are a whole bunch of good contributors there which are not admins (erm, including me). Please do not prevent us from maintaining this template. Thank you for your consideration. --Ligulem 09:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC) TC Mexican Climatology linkI appreciate the link, but there is no rainfall information at that site. =( Thanks for trying to help though. Thegreatdr 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC) Template:infobox hurricane smallI was thinking the exact same thing just an hour or so before you added it to Alberto, with the projected track instead of the final track. This makes me think of the time we both uploaded a high-resolution version of Image:2005 Atlantic hurricane season map.png. I guess we think alike. :) --tomf688 (talk - email) 00:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Re: Us folks are evilHeh. I'm sorry if I offended anyone by that, believe me I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings. I'll be blunt. The main reason I suggested an expansion to Simple was so some of the contributors who like to create articles, including those who don't write particularly well, are able to make articles and write with the lower quality of grammar they typically use. Wikinews needs help as well, definetly, but those users I mentioned on my talk page would probably continue the simple writing, copy and pasting, and spelling errors they use here. In short, we should expand to both. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I blocked this guy because he kept recreating Tkendi but only for an hour because he vandalised my user page (thanks for the revert) and I didn't want it to look like revenge. Please review. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
InupiaqAn anonymous user created the legitimate text in ik:Iqsrabutilik within the last little bit, meaning that there is indeed potential users. Does this effect your view of the project? -- Zanimum 14:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC) KatrinaThank you for answering my comment in the Katrina FAC. But now I have another question. Go to this page to see my question. Remember, feel free to answer it. juan andrés 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Current Events
ZetaWhere did the Zeta agreement occur, I can't seem to find it. TimL 00:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Re: BarnstarThanks for that! Great job on the design. It looks awesome :) Hurricanehink (talk) 12:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC) WWE roster VandalsYou can rest assured that the 3 vandals to the WWE roster page have been blocked. --JFred 02:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC) RevertThank you for the revert of that. --Dakota ~ 02:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC) I was going through List of storms in the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season today, and noticed that the tracks were missing on the TDs/USTS; turns out you modified the Infobox hurricane small template. Anyway, there's a problem, at least on my end. Take a look at the TD10 section. Does its satellite image appear for you? It doesn't for me. I strongly believe this to be a result of your modification. Any idea how to fix it? -- RattleMan 04:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Consulta de borradoHola. El artículo es:Canal 5 creo que ha sido suficientemente contextualizado y mejorado, y la entrada trasladada a Canal 5 de Rosario. Consulto si estás de acuerdo en cambiar tu voto para archivar la consulta. Saludos 190.49.211.9 06:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC) (Usuario: Antur - de la wiki en español ) - no estoy registrado aquí SarahVulvaHey, thanks for stepping in to remove the image. I wasn't going to bed until I felt I could drop out of the hunt. Now I'm going to sleep. Thanks a lot! Good luck! Regards, --Alphachimp talk 07:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC) Thank you for your support Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuiviénen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC) AtomCould you please review atom as the antimatter section is clearer. Rex the first talk | contribs 17:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Re: KatrinaI'll try, but I, too, am really busy in real life. I've been working double shifts since Saturday, and have to until Wednesday, so I don't have a lot of time on here. I'll try and keep an eye on things, but you should ask someone else who would probably have more time. Nilfanion maybe? He did rewrite much of that article. Hurricanehink (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks!
--Pilot|guy 22:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Please help on William ShakespearePosted by PruneauT 01:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team. TfD nomination of Template:DeleteTemplate:Delete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Wisden17 19:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Hi, I am sending this message to serious contributors who may be interested in articles related to U.S. politics. I believe I am receiving an unreasonable response-- and at times insulting and rude-- from the editors of Norm Coleman article, who refuse to remove a section that may offer some interesting trivia for Wikipeidia users, but is irrelevant to people interested in reading an encyclopedia article on a member of U.S. Senate. If you have time, please take a look at the article. Regards. 172 | Talk 03:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpgImage:Earthimpact lmb.jpg "NASA Spacelink has Moved" - please specify the source of the image. (SEWilco 04:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC))
Copyright problems with Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg An image that you uploaded, Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SEWilco 04:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
A short Esperanzial updateAs you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter. As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections. Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Katrina revertThanks, I was looking at an old version of the article and didn't realize it. (for some reason the big banner at the top didn't register) TimL 03:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC) Away and tool stuffI'm going to be off to China for about 3 weeks starting Monday, so happy editing in the meantime! I committed some new improvements into the tool, in case you haven't seen them already. Hope things go smoothly while I'm away! See you soon, —AySz88\^-^ 08:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 10,000Work via WikiProjectsHi Tito, Haven't heard from you in a while, I hope things are going well with you. Congratulations on your Barnstar! I have been trying to contact WikiProjects in a second round using these possible postings and this list as a template. Since there are now so many WikiProjects, I'm using our ten categories to organise things now, so they match with our categories in the V0.5 template, etc. The problem is, there is a huge amount to be done and I'm currently the only one working on it. It seems to be very fruitful - several of the postings have resulted in groups adding themselves to the bot (Films, Simpsons, Japan). I'd like to get all the projects re-contacted this summer if possible. If you have any time either to contact the Language & literature projects (next group on the list once I get through the Arts) or to update one of the listings (Science or Places would be simplest), it would be a great help. Thanks! Walkerma 04:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the reply, I'd guessed life just got busy. Would you prefer to focus on contacts/followups only, or on updating/reformatting listings, or can you manage both? I'm thinking of a timetable of Science in July, Places in August (or vice versa). What would you like to do? Thanks, Walkerma 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC) I would be EXTREMELY grateful if you could help out with the infrastructure stuff, you & I are about the only people familiar enough with the intricacies of the work. Currently I am switching tables from our original format over to the {{assessment}} format you wrote (including "importance"), you can see my start at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WPArts. The WVWP work is slow right now because it involves three stages before we can even contact groups. However it's VERY fruitful once contacts are made, just last night two more projects (trains and novels) added themselves to the bot list, I can see us breaking the 100,000 article barrier by fall (for articles read by the bot). Think what we can do with that level of metadata, especially once the assessments get done! Here are the three pre-contact stages:
Then, we're ready for contacting! The category changeover doesn't affect Science or Places, that's one hassle you can ignore. I had someone offer to help in contacting Science projects, it would be good to get someone new "trained" in this. If you could get those two sections updated and formatted, I'd be forever in your debt. Let me know if this is OK for you. Once again, MANY thanks, Walkerma 23:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Help requiredHi Tito, I am looking for help and hopefully have reached the right person. I need help with the Indian Institutes of Technology article. The article has recently achieved FA status. Within weeks of getting the FA status, Tony brought the article to Featured article review over concerns of quality of writing and use of citations, specifically Criterion 2(a) and 2(d). In the past few weeks, I tried to improve the article myself so as to take care of all the objections, however few editors are still unconvinced. Tony suggested that I contact a member of Version 1.0 Editorial Team. After going through the list of members of the team, and your own userpage, I feel that you will be perfect person to help me. Thanks, — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Tito and thanks for the image. I have a suggestion though. I think it would be good if the fonts were say three-five times as big, and the lines thicker, say twice as thick. That way the picture will look better as a thumb I would think. Wonder what you think about that. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:40, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Static content, WP 0.5, et alHi Titoxd, We're looking into various static content projects already underway over at the static content subcom, and would appreciate input. What would make your life easier in working on WP 1.0 and related projects? What sister projects have you encountered but not had time (or language skills) to coordinate with? &c. Please leave comments on the subcom's talk page. All the best, +sj + 15:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. Storm of the month  Other tropical cyclone activity
New and improved articles
New articles and improvements wanted
Member of the month  The June member of the month is Jdorje. The WikiProject awards this to him for his many contributions to the coverage of tropical cyclones on Wikipedia. Jdorje founded the WikiProject in October 2005 and established much of the categorizations the project depends on. His most significant contributions include the Featured article 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane and his track map generator with which he has created hundreds of track maps. Main Page content
Storm article statistics
WikiProject subpages This is a brief description of some of the subpages of the WikiProject, explaining their purpose briefly, to find out more read the pages.
Thanks to Hurricanehink to maintaining the stats table and producing the storm summaries. Nilfanion (talk) PersonalDA se esta metiendo personalmente conmigo: Tenga razon o no, es obvio que en estos primeros dos ejemplos solo actua por molestarme en mala fe,[1], [2]. Aqui me isnsulta Minor changes with ofensive summary Aqui modifica una pagina mia sabiendo que me va a molestar, vandalismo disfrazado: He know he is not welcomed yet he insisted El tipo no deja pasar ni 20 minutos para cambiar lo que sea que hago, nunca. Tienes idea? no te exagero, no hay pagina que haga o edite sin que el deshaga de 30 min a 12 hrs. despues. Ya admitio monitorearme y hay evidencia de que lo haga en mala fe. Aqui la tienes, con esto ya puedes obligarlo a dejarme en paz.
Previous cases:
Some interesting pages: Bullies mainly use a combination of intimidation and humiliation to torment others. The following are some examples of bullying techniques:
Te equivocas: In the matter of Cool Cat (talk • contribs) (aka User:Coolcat) — a case decided on October 5, 2005 — the ArbCom voted that wikistalking was unacceptable in the following circumstances:
Alguna duda? El comportamiento de DA no es permitido. DA llamo la atencion de Bennon y Shanel para el caso de arbitracion, no yo. Lo que estoy pidiendote es perfectamente legal. CovenantD y Grisworld no me conocian ni sabian de DA, dieron luz verde para el proyecto (logica: si existe todo un wikiproyecto acerca de como hacer articulos de episodios, categorias, categorias para shows animados y todos los ejemplos que he mencionado en la pagina de duialogo en cuestion estos articulos de episodios son perfectamente legales). Cuando DA los comenzo a revertir a lo wey, dio la impresion a los reservados editores de que estoy mal. El caso coolcat claramente identifica a DA, quien, ya me ha vandalizado mas de cuatro veces, me insulto incluso recientemente, y quien ya ha admitido varias veces monitorearme, como alguien que merece ser bloqueado por in año. Tu dime el tipo de pruebas que quieras y yo te las presento. Mejoras en mi comportamiento desde la arbitracion:
Sin embargo el no ha cambiado el comportamiento que genero el proceso en lo mas minimo. Nota como 3 de 4 veces que fui bloqueado fue por razones sin precedentes o buena justificacion. Ahora mismo podira revertir los q DA me ha revertido y causar que cuando el revierta por tercera vez, sea bloqueado. Al no castigarlo lo alientas, 100% de los problemas que "te doy" tienen su razon y justificacion en DA. Su mala fe ya se ha puesto en evidencia. --T-man, the wise 03:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC) No, me ha vandalizado 6 veces, incluyendo una de hoy. Se mete con mis imagenes, todo lo que me edita encima es encontra de mi movimiento, sabe q me molesta que se meta en mi pagina y lo sigue haciendo. Continuar discuciones en otras paginas no esta permitido. me ha vandalizado 6 veces. No es buena fe, te cite varios otros usuarios admitiendolo. Me haces pensar que solo tienes miedo de confrontarte. No se porque t cierrastanto a algo tan evidente. Sabes lo que es editar lo que sea dondesea sabiendo que un desgraciiado lo va a deshacer en mala fe a lo wey? te puedo hacer lo mismo para que veas que se siente (hablo retoricamente)? Tienes idea de como me hace sentir no poder hacer nada sin que el lo deshaga? Por que te parece justo? el no es nadie oficial para monitorearme, si quieres monitoreame tu o alguen chingon, qunque no sepas de los temas, despues de todo el ya admitio que no solo me monitorea sino que no sabe de muchos de los temad que edito y ya lo ha admitido ampliamente(por ejemplo, el no ha visto ninguna de las series animadas). De nuevo, si quieres, como experimento t puedo hacer lo mismo, igualito, aparentando buena fe. Si dices que es perfectamente inocente, entonces probablemente tener tu propio parasito acosador de seguro no te molestaria. Cool cat me dijo que no es facil identificar a los acosadores, mucho menos con administradores que prefieren hacerse a los ciegos que hacer justicia--T-man, the wise 04:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Titoxd, por lo menos deberias haber puesto un poco mas de atencion. Lleva diciendo esas mamadas de "let's be buds" desde que me conoce. Sabe que me encabrona y por eso lo hace. Si DA realmente quisiera paz me daria espacio. Tambien si hubieses puesto atencion sabrias que originalmente yo no uqeria que sea castigado. Si, ya no lo aguanto, quiero su cabeza. Yo cambie mi comportamiento despues de la arbitracion, DA sigue jodiendo exactamente igual y recuerda el caso se abrio por el, no por mi. ¿Que es tan dicicil de entender? De verdad me haces pensar q le tienes miedo a tu trabajo. Lo sigues consintiendo y el problema se hace mayor. Prefieres bloquearme a mi por cualquier detallito al que nadie mas bloquean que encararlo. ¿Por que putamadre se mete con mis imagenes o sigue escribiendo en mi pagina si sabe que me recontra caga la madre? Analiza las evidencias haciendote la gran predunta por que?. Me ha vandalizado 6 veces. Aunque 5 sean en el pasado es demasiada prueba de su mala fe. Ya te dije lee las paginas que te dije antes de responder, checa la evidencia, checa las citas de otros usuarios, responsabilizate, tu pediste encargarte. Si tengo derecho de no ser monitoreado por DA.--T-man, the wise 06:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Paginas que yo edito sin que DA me siga y las cambie en 30min a 12hrs. aprox= 10%. Da en cambio puede hacer lo q se le de la gana y yo no lo sigo y ni me entero. Cuando dices "solo por que DA deshizo unas ediciones tuyas de tal pagina" me queda claro que no te has dado cuenta de la magnitud del problema. Asi como esa, pasa lo mismo con TODO (literalmente todo!!! no es una exageracion figurada!!) lo que edito. Lo siento, pero de nuevo, ponte en mis zapatos, si yo estoy seguro de que DA es una vandalo acosador. que edita en mala fe, y seguro de que por alguna misteriosa razon no te puedes dar cuenta(esto reconozco que puede ser mi culpa por no saberme explicar), que otra cosa puedo hacer sino insistir?? Pide que te presente la evidencia como quieras, yo te lo hago. Mas que nada te pido ayuda, como puedes decir que me vas a castigar por eso? Si, es cierto, pero yo fui el que pedi los mentores!!! Y la idea era tenerlos en lugar de DA. Y no es irelevante, significa que aparte de las citas que te digo de Rowe y Steve Block y no c quien mas, DA incorrecta conducta llamo la atencion. Tambien te confunde el porque fui castigado mas, porque hasta el ultimo dia de la arbitracion, mi comprension de que cosas cuentan como ataque eran muy limitados... tanto que mis argumentos de defensa en el fueron considerados un ataque. Eso distrajo mucho la atencion de los que tomaron decisiones. La cita del caso Cool Cat, estaba en el tope de la pagina y de algun modo todos se olvidaron. Como puedes juzgarme tanto si no te metes a fondo al caso?--T-man, the wise 06:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit signature
Could you please elaborate? When would be a right time? -- Netsnipe CVU (Talk) 06:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Vofoy afa efedifitarar mufuchafas pafagifinafas defe tefemafas quefe nofe mefe ifinteferefesafan, pafarafa quefe vefeafas cofomofo mefe sifiguefe. --T-man, the wise 07:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC) RFA thanks
Ok, aqui tienes, observa como edite once veces en 20 horas y nueve me siguio... ya me siguio a la mayoria de mis contribs en menos de un dia. Ademas, en dos casos ya rompio la regla de no revertir mas de 3 veces. Ahi tienes, minimo para sacarlo una semana y prohibirle que me siga, pero por favor bloquealo de una vez por todas para siempre. lo mismo, que la anterior, todavía no hay cizaña, pero me molesta mucho que me siga Observa como no edite nada sin que me siga el desgraciado, todo mi trabajo fue alterado o borrado, por un tipo que ya admitio que nisiquiera ve estas series. --T-man, the wise 02:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Consensus and reversionIf my reversions of T-Man are justified how can I be banned for making them? The consensus is refer to is that of new pages for JLU episodes when the need to do so has not yet arisen... why wouldn't that extend to Batman animated episodes as well? Confused... -- Dyslexic agnostic 06:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Dyslexic agnostic appears unable to assume good faith with regards User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow, and appears to have formed himself into a one man T-Man correction squad, note [51]. I'm also concerned by the comments expressed in this diff, [52], which indicate some level of keeping an eye on T-Man. User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow seems incapable of keeping his temper with regards Dyslexic agnostic". -Steve Block ( Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence ).
Bueno, que esta pasando? el tipo rompio 3RR 2 veces en un dia, me ofendio en los resumenes, me siguio a ahora a 13 de 14 paginas y todavia no lo ves??? como es eso posible 13 d 14+ 3RR(x2)! Y no solo eso, sino que ademas me has bloqueado a mi por mucho menos!! Yo pedi los mentores para que me sigan en lugar de DA! Ahora tengo doble carga!! Tambien simplifique y mejore las tablas de vandalismo al principio de mis mensajes. checala aver si asi te cae el 20 de su mala fe contra mi persona. Nota los tiempos que tarda en editar en cada caso despues de mi, y el numoro de editores en medio. No es logico pensar que eso es justo o normal. Si no puedes o no quieres leer y checar las cosas (hey, todos tenemos cosas que hacer), pasa le mi caso a alguien que te lata. Robert Mclenon me ayudo bastante en el caso de arbitracion y pidio ser mi mentor, pero c v muy ocupado tambien.--T-man, the wise 07:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC) JLU epsEn este parrafo mucho antes de que me bloquees injustificadamente, cedi y deje de tratar de crear los articulos "Ok, this page some how, is different from all the other sharing the same format. I actually created the separeted articles because previous editors refused to expand it here, because they were also ignoring the list of lists of pisodes above. The guy that redirected the articles is a vandal who has chased, vandalized my page (erasing it all, moving it to T-man the stupid, etc.) and insulted me and you changed your mind because of his edits. Fine whatever, we will follow the now two-men-and-a-stalker-concensus. After all the unavoidable pages per episode will be sooner or later re-opened. And you will have contributed to nothing useful. What have you done anyways?--T-man, the wise 06:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)" Decirle silly a alguien no es buen motivo. Si te dicen "tontito" no significa mucho. Ademas, checaste lo que Chrisworld hizo para recibir ese comentario?... no lo creo [4], [5], y lo iba a hacer en todas las paginas donde estaba reclutando. El mismo pregunto si seria acoso y yo le puse el caso de referencia que te da la pauta de la definicion. Y si, no solo es desagradable lo que hizo sino totalmente inecesario (desde el punto d vista a su favor)--T-man, the wise 07:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC) I Have no warnings on my talk page except for dumb comments i am trying to clean upread the content of my page... I have a few people harrassing me. ER MD 08:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC) |
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AMaryjane.jpg&diff=61512295&oldid=61503967){kind=link}
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AScacarecroc02.jpg&diff=61512390&oldid=61503494){kind=link}