Jump to content

User talk:Materialscientist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Canadian Paul (talk | contribs) at 16:19, 2 March 2016 (→‎Changing c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, for example, by clicking "new section" at the top. I shall reply wherever you prefer. If I replied on your talk page, it means I am watching it, and there is no need to add the {{talkback}} template or quote the previous message.
  • If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
  • I switched off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.

Tony McGuinness

The changes I made are already supported by links that are presently at the bottom of the page! And you can confirm it by going to Above & Beyond's page, or looking them up on iTunes or Google Play! Science Bird (talk) 23:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Science Bird[reply]

Good Day

Dear Editor,

It came to my attention that my revisions were removed from the Wikipedia page regarding steam locomotive #1225, an operating railroad engine that is based in mid-Michigan. I am sorry that I did not leave any citations, but given that ones currently on the page are questionable, I retyped the known history of the locomotive. This is because it is stated in the article, and is commonly believed by the public, that the construction of the engine was completed on December 6, 1941. This is simply not the case. Not only do I have photographic proof, which I cannot upload due to copyright infringement, but I know many of the people who have the documents that say otherwise. I also know this engine firsthand because I happen to work on it during most weekends! The history I have been handed down on the 1225 and its sister locomotives as well as the railway it worked for has been passed on through 3 generations before me. The fact that Wikipedia has posted the current falsehood of 1225's birth date upsets me in the least because it shows that Wikipedia really isn't for professional use despite the fact that many experts publish and edit on here. That is why I signed up. Specifically to right wrongs that may or may not have been intentional. As such, I will rewrite my entries, but will cite myself as one of the sources because some of the documentation is not published. You can't exactly publish train orders unless they specifically appear in a book. If that is not good enough for you, you can contact the Steam Railroading Institute (the owner of the locomotive) and ask for me directly. Don't feel bad about this mistake as some of our own members believe the rumors, too. Although this could also be from reading the Wikipedia page!

Regards, Nick DeClerg

About That IP You Just Blocked

The vandal IP you just blocked, 58.169.244.234 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) also uses 49.196.6.21 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), as both IPs' edit summaries are identical, in addition to having identical edits.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
salute--Mr Fink (talk) 05:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And the same vandal has returned on 1.127.49.85 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))--Mr Fink (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nanotechnology/radiation therapy

theoretically we could manually bind or use nanobots to bind magnetically charged particles to human DNA molecules or even entire cell structures to then be moved and repaired or reshaped via a magnetic 3D-printer, or have the DNA/cells repaired/grown externally and implanted back into the body, this could even be used to erase/replace/add memories to the human brain or to entirely reverse the aging process all the way back to a sperm and egg, theres no limit. also if radiation damages DNA, radiation could also theoretically be harnessed to repair DNA using a radiation 3D-printer. EnergySplitter (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit

I'll compile list of websites that have references to the Lassa fever case and resubmit

Channar revolt

Hi, Material. I primarily edit Nadar articles. I am here to talk about the recent edits made by Rabtman to the Channar revolt. He has added refs to support his claims. However I doubt the validity of these refs. Rabtman is primarily here to glorify Nair relevant articles(please go through his history). He has inlcuded lines like the nadars were untouchacbles etc. Now this is a very complicated topic. According to Hardgrave and Templeman, leading anthropologists on this topic, the nadars were not untouchables. Some nadars were historically land lords. So the term Nadar today refers to all these different Nadars subcastes. The former status of all these Nadar subcastes were different from each other. So this is something we have to discuss. Most of the lines seem to glorify the Nair community(most of his edits to). I didnt revert his edits. I didnt do anything. Because I am tired of all this. My account is currently used by wife as I am very busy nowadays. Admins do not usually intervene to edit nadar pages. But I have done my best to keep the page as neutral as possible. I actually started editing because a long time ago the page was heavily attacked anti-nadar groups. I think that trend is coming back now. Please go through the recent made by rabtman to the chanar revolt article. He claims that the Nair women were allowed to cover their upper body. This topic has always baffled me. According to the Nair article, the nairs didnt cover their upper bodies(men and women). I would be obliged if you would go through the recent edits made by rabtman to the chanar revolt article. Most of the lines he included do not make sense. I am pretty thorough with this topic. I am willing to help you by providing you whatever info I can(I have the Hardgrave and Templeman book with me). If you are busy please recommend me some other editor who would be interested to edit these pages. I just want these articles to be maintained by neutral editors(Like the Nair article). Thank you for your time. Mayan302 (talk) 09:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Fairhead edit

Fairhead edit - regarding your message - I linked my changes to content containing freedom of information responses received from Department of Culture Media and Sport which are 100% accurate. Please restore edit.

Ban IP Permanently PLEASE

MS, Let's ban this one permanently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/71.189.227.217 Then we will only have the 10 mobile phone IPs left he uses to destroy articles. Enough is enough already. How can we improve our articles, when we are forced to patrol this guys shit every day? There is no time for idiots like this guy...please.-Thanks-Pocketthis (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm sorry MS. I appreciate your help here, but a 30 day block with this sick bastard isn't going to do squat. We are too damn lenient with these vandals. He has NEVER made a contribution here. Everything he has ever typed, on any IP, has been vandalisum.

So what do they have to do to get kicked out of here......"Kill one of us"? There's too much damn time spent policing these repeat offenders. Since this la-de-da attitude toward vandals seems to be the norm here, I'm just never going to revert one again EVER. Count on it. Pocketthis (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IPs are re-assigned, and people change their IPs at will, hence it is wrong to think that by indefblocking an IP we can eliminate a vandal for good - we'll likely hit the next user of that IP instead. And that user could be an organization with thousands of editors. Bottom line, we do not (better say, should not) indefblock IPs. Materialscientist (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • MS. Thanks for the reply. I appreciate your condolence, however, we are losing too many editors because they waste too much time chasing vandals. It's gotten out of hand. - All the best...Pocketthis (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO....WILL YOU HELP ME TO CREATE ARTICLE ON OUR VILLAGE?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dr._Knowbibek&action=edit&redlink=1

Yeah, scientist? This is a cry for help. Drmies (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong time, wrong place - I'm recovering from a nasty flu and got tons of real-life stuff. Sorry, can't help everyone. Materialscientist (talk) 23:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Eat more garlic and green onions.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Its a really nasty one, so cookies work better :-). Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I sympathize, but this village is languishing. Come on MS; don't make me sic ArbCom on you for dereliction of duty. Hope you feel better soon. Drmies (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) I was going to sympathize and say Get Well Soon MS but after Mr Fink I am now worried it's vampirism not flu and I don't quite know where I stand on that. But best wishes anyway DBaK (talk) 08:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This surely is a troublesome situation, and this conversation is quite a change from the usual all-business threads on MS's talk page. I wonder if he's doing alright. Do we have a medical professional in the house, one who does mental health as well? Drmies (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
tomb emergence snark redacted--Mr Fink (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Get well soon, Mlpearc (open channel) 18:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's his other IP to ban

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.54.251.214 Then, after you are done banning this one, he will move to his mobile phones, but at least we can make it a bit more of an inconvenience for him. - Thanks- Pocketthis (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question for you...

I've had User:Henrik's talk page on my watchlist for a while (mostly because I forget to clean the watchlist up occasionally). Henrik seems to have disappeared and the old pageview stats tool is out of order. People have posted info all over his talk page about the new tool and where to complain, but more come each day and do not bother to read any of it. User:js recently added another message to inform people, but I was wondering, is there some template or wiki-markup that would keep such a post at the bottom of the page, so that all other posts end up above it? I ask because it is more likely that people will read the bottom of the page, thus answering their questions automatically.

I don't know if such a thing is possible, but figured it wouldn't hurt to ask in the hopes of efficiently directing users to the new stats tool.

Thanks. Zaereth (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it looks like js may have figured out a way. Sorry to bother you. Zaereth (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Version 2

Can you block version 2 also. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Mlpearc (open channel) 03:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chlorine

Hi Materialscientist, can you please write your opinion here too. Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi man10 sockpuppet

You seem to be the user:Iraqi man10 specialist. Seven hours after you blocked his latest sockpuppet user:Bruskom, the account user:Kordestani was created. Take a look at his contributions. As his new name indicates (Kordestani = kurd), he continues to get involved in pro-kurd edit warring. I am willing to bet a duck that it is him. Tradediatalk 06:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laura wright (singer)

Hi 'material secuentist',

You changed my page back to the original unedited one yesterday at some point. I am that Laura Wright, I am the singer so I am pretty sure I know what's correct and what isn't. I spent time editing the page so if you could please revert back to the edits I made I would appreciate it. I'm just trying to keep my site updated. Most importantly, you have changed my management details back to the old ones which could be costing me precious time and work.ill check back later today, if you require citation or references that's fine but please ask before reverting or editing pages yourself. Thank you. Laura Laurawrighty (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of user page

Hi, I noticed a new user, User:Psychohifi, copied your used page to theirs. I accidentally clicked the 'patrol page', to make things worse. I may report this issue elsewhere in a while if you aren't able to read this. Gap9551 (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They changed their page while I was typing this. Gap9551 (talk) 01:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salomeeaalexandru899

Hey. There's a user named Alexandru and do you mind blocking him to infinite? Because he keeps changing the TriStar Pictures logo on the TriStar Pictures article. --Rod14 (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Rod14 why would you do this? Looking at their contributions they do not appear to be blocked at the moment. DBaK (talk) 08:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) DBaK But he keeps changing the new TriStar Pictures logo to the 1993 logo saying it's re-current. Please keep an eye out. --Rod14 (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DMX almost died

"Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)"

This bitch almost died...why did you lock the page without looking it up http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/10/dmx-s-downfall-from-hip-hop-king-to-the-brink-of-death.html

Hip fracture page edits

Hello, thank you for your previous message. I have added references to our edits on the "Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures" section on the Hip Fracture page, do let me know if this is now ok.

Thank you!

Hello!

Passing by and saying hello! Mind if i ask, what university did you get your PhD from? Wintery Time on the Grassland (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi, Sorry if i disturbed you. I wanted to just inquire about the link which got removed from chromatography page. I value your feedback but the page was exactly related to chromatography hence i had linked to it.

I would appreciate your valuable feedback on the same.

Thank you.

A brief answer is this: there is no evidence that the page you linked brings reliable inormation. Materialscientist (talk) 12:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dry ice

Hi, sorry for removing the "cardice" part, someone had inserted terrible "Encyclopedia Dramatica style" humor at the top of the article and I wanted to remove it, it seems my editing was a little too broad.

Weekender311's attempt to sanitize the Terry Bean article to remove references to his criminal conviction on charges of child molestation.

I am reverting edits made by editor Weekender311 which were intended to sanitize subject Terry Bean's criminal conviction for child molestation. Weekender311 didn't even bother to leave a comment explaining why he removed material from the article. Further, you didn't notice that the citations were already present in the article. Lurie2 (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reversed your ham-handed attempt to back up Weekender311's efforts, in which you didn't bother to leave any sort of comment on the Talk page. Contrary to your action, I followed the policy WP:BRD (Bold, Revert, and Discuss). I actually began a discussion on the Talk page. The reality is, this article correctly referred to Terry Bean's criminal conviction, prior to Weekender311's reversion of references to that, also without leaving commentary. Lurie2 (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding for the record a notation that Materialscientist is ignoring my challenge to him to actually defend his objections to my inclusion of well-sourced material identifying accused child molester Terry Bean of his crimes, in the article Terry Bean. Evidently, Materialscientist has an interest in watching that page to help people like Weekender311 remove embarrassing and incriminating text about Bean, even though that text is well-sourced and proper. I ask Materialscientist to stop defending child rapists, and people who do their bidding on WP. What interest do you have, Materialscientist, in this matter? Why do you not reply, here and now? Lurie2 (talk) 08:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photosynthetic efficiency

So could you help to know how can a farmer increase the photosynthetic efficiency of a crop in the field???...And which practises can a farmer performe that will aid in increase carbon dioxide level in the field?? Thank you...am wait your reply 

Mnofu Protas (talk) 05:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ab3951214

Looks like a spambot. Haven't seen any other "Brain Pills" spammers yet. INeverCry 05:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, no sleepers on their IP. Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Four years ago ...
suggestions for attitude
... you were recipient
no. 12 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bondurant edit

I changed the page to reflect the current city council. I am on the city council and was elected in November 2015. I am also aware of the special census and new population even though youth I could not find a link online for the update. Hawkeye50035 (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question about barefoot

Hello i have a question about Barefoot and one question for you :)

Can you write me for my website http://shoesmonkey.com/ a lets say good article what is barefoot , how barefoot is reflects on health , what can you do about barefoot and how to choose best shoes for barefoot ? If you can i will make a page about that and also i will put link to this page of wikipedia and post big thanks to you as my guest and adviser for barefoot. I will also ask you to put link from my web site on your page of wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barefoot of course when i finish the work on my webpage.

Hope you will answer me fast :)

IP back

Their category-adding IP 81.97.242.72 is back, undeterred. Bring the definition of sanity to mind. --Drmargi (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Garry Marshall Cameo Apperances

Garry makes a point to be in the movie, and not a talking character. In Pretty Women he is the street bum. In Runaway Bride he played the position of 1st base.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mackenziekruvant/you-probably-didnt-know-about-pretty-woman#.ojE583vR9

Guard1193 (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Choline

Please verify this information at USDA Nutrient Database. Link is found on Wikipedia page just below nutritional value for this product. Thank you.

Garry Marshall Cameo

Additional Reference For Valentine Days

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0817230/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv

Protection requests

Please protect Haman (biblical figure) and Charles Martin (boxer). 2602:306:3357:BA0:2C7C:DB86:7026:2A41 (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these articles look like they're being vandalized pretty heavily. I'd submit these requests to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection so that there's visibility to all administrators. This will result in the requests being processed faster than leaving a request to only one person here. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already did that, but nobody is responding. 2602:306:3357:BA0:2C7C:DB86:7026:2A41 (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No worries then. Be patient; somebody will process your requests. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

your school block on 66.87.97.32

Immediately returned to one of the same articles and referenced my undos.[1] Meters (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. It is a busy and mobile IP range, thus hopping is possible, but rangeblocking would cause much collateral. Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect that he'll stop now. Meters (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for a tireless Administrator

The Admin's Barnstar
You've reached 700,000 total edits. You are an awesome, and dedicated Administrator! Cheers! Boomer VialHolla 04:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keralafootpath

Revoke talk page access as well?--Cahk (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another one

Hi, concerning this block, this is clearly another IP trying to add a certain "Glenn Quave" to some articles. Was active on Taekwondo too: 104.192.67.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Cheers - DVdm (talk) 21:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More malicious than you thought

1.136.97.0/24 that you blocked a few weeks ago as a simple anon/"likely school", and American Hi Fi OK Go that you level1 warned today, match all the signs of the LTV Dylan Florida. These keep coming up so often and so obvious and possibly not really curable according to some that I tend to RBI and forget to add to the SPI. Let me know if you want more information. DMacks (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Sevendust Nine Inch Nails - no clues for further action at the moment. Materialscientist (talk) 06:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

editor

Reply me Godfreee (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply me fast Godfreee (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

editor

Will plz help me about. How should I edit. Godfreee (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My deconstructive change to N

I'll try to improve and thank you for the suggestion to experiment at the sandbox. Mcpemaestro (talk) 12:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bolivia

Thanks. Regarding the comments about the predominance of Native American Ethnic Background in Bolivia respect to other American countries, info could be checked in the Wikipedia articles about: (Population) Genetics of (South) America, or by searching in: EntrezPubMed, or specialized magazines such as: 'American Journal of Human Genetics', or Nature's: 'European Journal of Human Genetics', or sites as National Geographic's Geno2.0, or FamilyTreeDNA. The information about the Potosi silver mine is a folk tradition in Spain, and size of Potosi town in the past was discussed in Spanish history publications such as: 'Historia16'. One of my relatives was in the same US Army course as Hugo Banzer, where a man who became later minister of war in South Viet-Nam, and an Argentinian officer named Torino were also present. I guess this is enough sourcing, can't tell more about date of this army course, but it was in the 60s or late 50s, I don't want to identify myself that clearly. You may like hearing the song: 'Luz de amanecer', in the album: 'El canto de los poetas revolucionarios', by the group: 'Los Calchakis', the existence of rustic statues in the Potosi mine, representing: 'El tio Jorge', -Uncle George-, identified as Satan, and of: 'Maximón', also known in other Spanish speaking American countries, identified to: 'Judas Iscariot', both statues being given food, tobacco, liquors, is reported in publications from church missionary societies: 'Mundo Negro', 'Misiones Salesianas', and in other non-religious sources. Regards, + salut--Jgrosay~enwiki (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surface tension (Influence of temperature)

Hi, I am Znfrlj. Am only a beginner with editing, but I hope I can contribute my knowledge. The change I made was in my opinion justified [1][2]. If Tc is critical temperature for water it is surely incorrect now. Please check again. It should be 374°C (674K) not 374K. Best regards

References

  1. ^ http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jcp/93/10/10.1063/1.459409
  2. ^ http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/?title=Textbook_Maps/General_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Map:_Chemistry_%28Averill_%26_Eldredge%29/11:_Liquids/11.6:_Critical_Temperature_and_Pressure

Sub Replacement fertility, Societal Collapse, Fermi Paradox

The overcrowding hypothesis is not original research. It can be validated by this official published NIMH article.

http://tomax7.com/HeyGod/misc/MousePopulationStudy.PDF

promet14Promet14 (talk) 04:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andray Blatche

about the things I added recently that you deleted regarding his state and shape, and his stats during the 2015 tournament Source: <http://sports.inquirer.net/193371/blatche-working-hard-to-get-back-in-shape-for-fiba-asia-wars>, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_FIBA_Asia_Championship#Statistical_leaders>

and here's from the 2014 FIBA World regarding his stats that I added: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_FIBA_Basketball_World_Cup#Statistics> and the results of the games of the said tournament: <http://www.fiba.com/basketballworldcup/2014/Philippines#tab=schedules_and_results>

Hi. Just noticed you wrote message to me regarding Chechen Mafia article. I deleted part which states alqaeda and mojahedins were allies of Chechen Mafia. Is there any reliable source to back this statement up? Besauri (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NoDongMissileCompany

Dear Editor,

It came to my attention that my revisions were removed from the Wikipedia page regarding NUS, an operating treason group. I am sorry that I did not leave any citations, but given that ones currently on the page are questionable, I retyped the known history of the locomotive. This is because it is stated in the article, and is commonly believed by the public, that the construction of the engine was completed on December 6, 1941. This is simply not the case. Not only do I have photographic proof, which I cannot upload due to copyright infringement, but I know many of the people who have the documents that say otherwise. I also know this engine firsthand because I happen to work on it during most weekends! The history I have been handed down on the 1225 and its sister locomotives as well as the railway it worked for has been passed on through 3 generations before me. The fact that Wikipedia has posted the current falsehood of 1225's birth date upsets me in the least because it shows that Wikipedia really isn't for professional use despite the fact that many experts publish and edit on here. That is why I signed up. Specifically to right wrongs that may or may not have been intentional. As such, I will rewrite my entries, but will cite myself as one of the sources because some of the documentation is not published. You can't exactly publish train orders unless they specifically appear in a book. If that is not good enough for you, you can contact the Steam Railroading Institute (the owner of the locomotive) and ask for me directly. Don't feel bad about this mistake as some of our own members believe the rumors, too. Although this could also be from reading the Wikipedia page!

Regards, Nick DeClerg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.68.213 (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) IP, I'm afraid citing yourself will not pass muster - please read about what Wikipedia accepts as a reliable source, and our policy on verifiability. Thanks -- samtar whisper 13:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An old block

It looks as if your block of 82.219.37.109 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was intended to be temporary, not indef. Spotted by User:Zeke Essiestudy.[2]  —SMALLJIM  09:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked, thanks. Some admins indefinitely block some IPs - this is debatable, but there are good reasons in some cases.
Anyway, any indef. block of an IP from my account is a misclick. Materialscientist (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block user:Febumatt. He is showing gross pictures of a butt. 2602:306:3357:BA0:E049:C35E:92D7:EED0 (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

That had occurred to me the other day when I started, but I'm not sure I agree with it. Largely because I don't see it as "fixing nothing" - I'm cementing a link to Commons in place that will remain when/if the article is moved. That may seem a remote possibility, but it's something I've already come across at least once while doing this, an article (which was moved) tied to a Commons category (which was not). So the article appeared tied to an empty Commons category, but a little digging revealed that not to be the case. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, of course they can. My point is that, using the old template, when one or the other moves the link between them is broken, as long as it's only [1] in use on the page. If the template in use is [2], then the move itself breaks nothing. And if the link does break then there's some kind of a road map to explain what happened. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block user:70.124.133.228 for he is not explaining his changes. 2602:306:3357:BA0:35FE:4761:3FC0:A24A (talk) 01:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE DO IT.

References

  1. ^
    Wikimedia Commons has media related to Materialscientist.
  2. ^
    Wikimedia Commons has media related to [[commons:Category:[PAGENAME]|[PAGENAME]]].

Removal of my edits on Dr Abdullah Abdullah the Chief Executive of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Dear Sir/Madam, My name is Mujib Rahman Rahimi, and I am the official spokesperson of the Office of the Chief Executive of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. I came across the section on Wikipedia related to the biography and life of His Excellency Dr Abdullah Abdullah, the Chief Executive of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. That section has factual mistakes, and needs to be edited urgently. Please advise me on how to make the correction.

Best regards Dr Mujib Rahman Rahimi Director of Communication & Spokesperson Office of the Chief Executive Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Mobile: +93702103333 

              +93708400400

Email: mujibr2@hotmail.com 

           mujib.rahimi@ceo.gov.af

Website: www.ceo.gov.af Faceebook: https://www.facebook.com/AFGHANCEO Sapedar Palace, Kabul-Afghanistan

Mrahimi1 (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Hello

Hi, I am Osman Erken, one of the digital supervisor of Murat Ülker. My sources come from the wikipedia page of Murat Ülker. So, they are reliable and you made a mistake. İn which way can we publish the knowledge again? Thank you!

Murat Ulker; http://linkedin.com/in/mulker http://twitter.com/Mu_ulker http://facebook.com/mu.ulker http://instagram.com/mu_ulker

User: 124.6.181.216

Hello Materialscientist, I see you have previously warned 124.6.181.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for their editing. This IP is again deleting information and altering date formats from various articles, notably today The Rockford Files amongst others. I have reverted these edits, but the IP is ignoring the reverts and giving no reason for their alterations. I will not edit war, but believe that the IP should be stopped in their disruptive behaviour. Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling articles and a persistent SP

Not sure what to do here so, since you helped with an earlier manifestation, I ask you. Yesterday you helped delete a series of articles serially created by a series of confirmed sock puppets of one master. This morning sure enough we are back with Rapitade, Rapitoel and Paritocrabron. So far I've only speedied an article which duplicated one that already existed but that was of course deleted right away. I figure another SPI investigation would be useless since he just moves on - and I do wonder if a more global ban on that IP location would be in order. How does one start that process if indeed it is appropriate.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User 195.14.156.21

I have just found several bits of misinformation inserted by user 195.14.156.21 two weeks ago and wondered if you would consider blocking him. He has had a final warning but these examples of vandalism preceded it. I think the insertion of false information into Wikipedia is more damaging than more blatant forms of vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Manchuria as a region now does not exist because it is divided into North East China and Far East Russia. It is useful to make the distinction? Juicebaby (talk) 10:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the summary paragraph, it says "Manchuria and Primosky Krai". It should either be historical Manchuria, which is now made up of NE China AND Primosky Krai Juicebaby (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eti_Mine_Works

I am new in Wikipedia editing. I make some changes on "Eti_Mine_Works" because I have been working in this company. Thus, I believe that my update should stay and you would undo.

WP:AIV

Hi, I just wanted to say 'thanks' for the good, quick work you're doing at AIV. I did have one question however; with this block here, is 31 hours mandatory? Or is it a judgement call? (and why "31" hours? It's an... odd number. Seems kinda' random) Cheers - theWOLFchild 12:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Judgment call; 31 hours because many vandals return in 24 hours, the increment is to shift daily hours. Materialscientist (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. Thanks again. - theWOLFchild 20:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

chess master Bwalya

His first name is Gillian not Gillan, FIDE is in error. Sources - player's own scoresheet, articles online http://www.thechessdrum.net/blog/2013/08/11/gillian-bwalya-at-world-cup/ http://www.chessdom.com/gillian-bwalya-wins-2015-zimbabwe-chess-open-championships/

IP adding (and re-adding) unsubstantiated allegation to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 16)

Materialscientist, there's been an IP who has been adding text including the clearly inappropriate claim "The final results were said to be rigged." to the article. Each time, the IP comes back under a new address. There have been five attempts to add the information so far, all of them this month:

I've left warning on the respective talk pages of the most recent two IP addresses, and on my reversions of the past three I've made it clear that unsourced and unsupported additions of this nature are not appropriate. Is there some point where a block is appropriate? I guess it would have to be a range block, since the user comes in under a new address each time, and I rather doubt is even aware of my posts to the earlier IP addresses. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The IP came back with a completely new address, 222.127.0.183, but the same text. Since it's presumably the same person each time, and it's only the one attempted edit, I doubt it would qualify for semi-protection. Or would it? What's the best approach in this circumstance? BlueMoonset (talk) 15:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

98.183.200.178

please block user:98.183.200.178. 2602:306:3357:BA0:D535:E2BB:57E4:837D (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit on Niwot High School

Yeah... not really sure what to do for a citation. They haven't bothered to put it on the website yet, but they made a bunch of t-shirts for the teachers and put it on a handful of banners. I bet most of the other students don't even know about it. Jkmartindale (talk) 12:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum gravity

Hello,

You recently reverted a deletion I made to the "quantum gravity" article. The reasons for the deletion are explained in detail on that article's talk page, but essentially I deleted content that gave apparently equal weight to an obscure, self-published theory called "causal fermionic systems" as to the established programs of string theory and loop quantum gravity. Probably, reference to the theory ought to be deleted entirely, but it certainly should not be mentioned in the introduction. Would you please restore the deletion. (138.51.113.24 (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]

User: FlorenceHenderson

I reported this user's name to ARV as being misleading because it is the name of one of the articles (Florence Henderson) that they edited/vandalized but they were blocked before the possible username issue was acted upon. Not sure if this is important enough to report again as they are still under their block. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend

Hi, @Materialscientist sorry for my bad editing, I'm new in wikipedia. Kosovoslovenian (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re. HTSC

Deleting new peer reviewed scientific discoveries is hardly conducive to a free and open society now is it.

Deleted Page

Hi There, I see you deleted the page I created: Binary_to_Base64_Examples. I am admittedly new to creating pages on here, but I think the content I posted was informative, as well as cited and linked. The Data_URI_scheme page has some examples, but I was hoping to expand the Binary_to_Base64_Examples to be a broader example set of Base64 encoding. In your opinion, was the information more suited to the Data_URI_scheme page?

It appeared as original research. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there Enigmastrat, maybe I can interject. I don't remember ever seeing stand-alone "examples" articles on Wikipedia; instead, examples are sometimes included in the articles they are relevant to. In this case, why not simply Base64 (which already has an example)? Keep in mind that to exist as stand-alone articles, pages on Wikipedia generally need to assert and demonstrate notability as stand-alone subjects. Base64 is notable in itself, but its individual aspects, likely including random examples to demonstrate it, are quite conceivably not. Materialscientist may have further thoughts, but that's my take. LjL (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I understand now. I'd like to be able to convey an example of a larger image (as well as some other data) as encoded in Base64 format and didn't want to clutter the main pages. I'll model what I add after what's there and see if I can find some examples that fit the format a little better. Enigmastrat (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Zinc article - Mining and Processing section

I re-read the section and I know understand the intent. You can disregard my assertion below; thank you for reverting the error.

I'll grant I don't have a reliable source to site on the subject but I'd like to point out that the formulas as shown don't make sense.

2 ZnO + C → 2 Zn + CO
2
ZnO + CO → Zn + CO
2

Where did the CO come from? If the intent is to show a series of reactions, as seems clear from the text, then this fails to do so. It is most likely that the original poster made a type on the original reactions, or that someone changed it eroneously since then. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the relevant reference #85 in the article, The Zinc Handbook. If you do, could you please look up the material and verify that the reactions are as intended?

Request to move an article from sandbox to live, without leaving back links

@Materialscientist: @Nvvchar and I have been working on Pashupatabrahma Upanishad draft. It is in decent shape to be made live. I would appreciate if you would please move it, without leaving links to Nvvchar/sandbox and incorrectly named original file therein. The first draft was created in sandbox with title spelling errors, which I fixed. The title of the sandbox article is okay now. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for your hard work dealing with vandalism! Marianna251TALK 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taokaka's socks

Hey Materialscientist. I just wanted to let you know that this editor User:2602:306:3357:ba0:7d97:633a:1ea5:332f is most certainly a sock of User:Taokaka as well. I'm not sure if (s)he will be able to migrate back to this one, but just thought it'd might help. Boomer VialHolla 01:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A group of related accounts have been spamming external links to episode videos in several TV show articles over the past couple of hours. These accounts include the following:

One of them replaced an mdy template at the top of the article with their external link.

If there's anything you can do here, it would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked 36.72.48.0/21 and 124.35.151.0/24, but there is a significant collateral damage on the 36.xxx range. Materialscientist (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. With any luck this will discourage them; I notice that 36.72.53.168 got in one more spam edit less than ten minutes before you did the blocks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They've turned up again today at List of Arrow episodes, this time just using account names: "Well sevanew" and "Kelvin M. Miller31", following up on an earlier attempt under 36.72.53.168 prior to your rangeblock. (I see that I also missed an IP who posted before 36.72.53.168: 216.169.108.200.) BlueMoonset (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also "Patrick M. Ricketts25896", from about half an hour ago, on two of the other articles that were targeted in my first report. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, but they used proxies and will keep coming. Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For what it may be worth, watchtvshownow.ml, movietv.biz, touchhere.ml, viewhd.me, and tvhd.online have been added to the Wikipedia:Spam-blacklist. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, this may help. In the past, such spammers were sometimes adding redirects to their websites, to extend the range of domains and bypass our filters. We'll see. Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Stephenson sock

Pretty obvious, really. Thanks for all your hard work. GABHello! 20:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious indeed, blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Butch Jones

I'm very confused by your message to me. You didn't like a change I posted because it wasn't cited specifically, and yet all media outlets have reported it. Additionally, I'm told to message you here with questions/comments but then you post at the top of your page that if someone is questioning s revert for uncited sources, not to bother. You can't have it both ways. Or, I suppose, you can because apparently you're the Wikipedia God. This is why Wikipedia still lacks credibility and why nobody I know contributes to "the cause" when you beg and plead for money. Luckily, my change was a PSA and having it on the Wikipedia entry is superfluous. Enjoy your day.

Do you use bots?

Hello! I was wondering if you use bots. I noticed you had some edits that look automated. Just wondering. Winterysteppe (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never used bots, but I use some freely available java scripts written by wikipedia editors. Materialscientist (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a pervert-lover?

You seem to be defending people who themselves defend perverts. Any particular reason why? 67.5.218.123 (talk) 05:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't assume when you don't know - my only interest in that article is to quench edit warring. Materialscientist (talk) 05:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:104.243.160.113

I noticed you blocked User talk:104.243.160.113.

I left a message yesterday about this editor at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#New sock of User:Dragonrap2. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on IP

G'day Materialscientist. [72.245.246.219] came up on AIV, and I warned them for harassment of another user, but others are suggesting they are just WP:NOTHERE. There is some evidence of that, and nothing in article space to speak of. I'm still finding my way with the mop, and am not sure what the best approach is with this one. Would you mind having a quick look? I'd appreciate it. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quick answer is this: such cases should be reported to WP:ANI, for a community discussion, they are not suitable for WP:AIV. Some admins go ahead and block such IPs for harassment - this is a judgment call. Admins do have much freedom in making decisions, yet at their own risk. Materialscientist (talk) 02:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time. An editor has done that now, will see how it goes. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: @Nvvchar and I have been working on two more Upanishad articles. These articles are in decent shape, but lack more in-depth translation that I would prefer. They have reliable sources, and are a decent introduction to these notable texts. Requesting that you review these two drafts, see if they are worthy of being made live to wikipedia, or if they should be held back till new publications emerge as reliable sources. If you decide to move them, they need to moved without leaving back links. The two articles with appropriate titles:

Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 04:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know almost nothing about this topic, and therefore recommend asking a review from someone else. Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Titodutta: What are your thoughts on the above two articles? Leave them in the sandbox, or are they now useful enough to make them live? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: Per @Titodutta's review comment here, please go ahead and move the two articles. Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in the Bahrain article

The changes I made were already supported by the links present on the page and i couldn't find any other reliable article or anything related to it. However I have added some citations and links related to it. I hope you wont remove it again. Thanks for pointing my mistakes out. good day.

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between revisions

Hello, this page about Czech author is about me. Do you You know???

Changing c

Hi Materialscientist. I appreciate all of the work that you have been doing on the pages of Swedish Olympians, but I wanted to ask why many of your edits take sources that are cited properly using a citation template and reduce them to just a link with a simple description. This is most noticeable with the Sports Reference and Swedish Olympic Committee links, but it happens with others as well. Maybe I'm missing something here, but I'm not really seeing the benefit of doing this.... could you clue me in? Thanks. Canadian Paul 04:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why using templates where they are clearly not needed? This is not only the issue of code clutter; the templated refs typically contain accessdate, which is often misleading - while updating the article editors revisit the reference, but don't change the accessdates (time is precious). Both Sports Reference and Swedish Olympic Committee do change their pages. Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can't speak for other editors, but if I use a source, I update the accessdate. And even if I didn't, how does the situation improve by not including one at all? I disagree that the templates are not needed - they provide valuable information and are used widely throughout the project. I'm a lot less concerned about "code clutter" (applicable only to the limited amount of people who edit the pages) than I am about proper citation (useful theoretically to anyone who views the page). Canadian Paul 05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And now you are reverting edits while we are discussing the issue. Excellent job at collaboration there. Canadian Paul 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I took it to WP:THIRD so that we can get a quick resolution. Whatever is agreed upon is fine by me. Canadian Paul 05:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. This is a nitpicking issue. More important is to go to those sources (say, Sports Reference, Stora Grabbar and Swedish Olympic Committee pages) and put their data into our articles. I find that nearly all our article creators don't do that, even though they create their few-line stubs from the very same sources I use, and this is frustrating. Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm here from 3O. When I first saw this filing, I thought it was someone going around and expanding small refs to large ones or converting one acceptable style to another. That's arguably unnecessary but also arguably good, someone volunteering to do a little behind-the-scenes busywork. But please, do not take fully formatted references and remove information that readers or other editors might find useful. If MS or anyone doesn't want to use the long form while adding new material themselves, that's their business, but don't undo other people's work. I have based this opinion solely on the information presented here. If there is anything I missed, feel free to cite a diff. Darkfrog24 (talk) 06:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Darkfrog24:. Materialscientist, as you can see above, the third opinion has asked that you not remove information from the citation templates, so please stop doing it. It could be construed as disruptive behavior at this point. As to your comment above, whenever I create an article, I pull out all the information I can from the sources and use it in the article, which is exactly the reason that I am concerned about the citations being done properly. You clearly pull out different things and that is fine - you'll note that for the most part I don't revert your prose edits. I never add the SR citation just for the sake of adding another link to the page. Canadian Paul 16:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CSD Request

Can you please remove the page i created it is this redirect here Book:American Federal Goverment Agencies Thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Materialscientist:, I can always count on you, Also someone needs to make a wikilove menu so i dont have to go find the templates over and over but if you want go choose yourself a wikilove template and feel free to slap my name on it you deserve it :) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC) (forgot to sign again errg someone slap me...)[reply]

Lies

I think I beat you to it by a fraction of a second at User talk:JakeMcKenna1#March 2016. What a mess. Thanks for the help. Mkdwtalk 00:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geelong Grammar School

If you would like to add the sources, you are welcome. 1. Letter from Stephen Meek, emailed to school community. 2. Comments by Geelong Grammar School lawyer, read Royal Commission transcripts, published online. 3. The school lawyer naming the witness and being warned by the Commission, Geelong Advertiser's coverage of the first day. 4. Tony Inkster's lawyer claiming he was unwell, Royal Commission transcript. 5. GBVR. Geelong Grammar School's magazine, The Corian - middle school section. 6. John Bugg's comments - or lack of them - Royal Commission transcripts. 7. See also comments on: http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/geelong/geelong-grammar-fence-covered-in-ribbons-to-support-child-sexual-abuse-victims-as-part-of-global-loud-fence-movement/news-story/5b998cc6e7731b37e997e7d0cdb98c63

None of the comments made have ever been contested by the school. Just removing them is just trying to cover up what happened.

Follow-up: Thanks for your message but I am really sad for you if you would like to dismiss the transcripts of the Royal Commission and the school's magazine as 'hearsay'. You can continue trying to remove edts you disagree with - but the truth is emerging, however slowly, and however much people have been trying to cover it up. The source have been cited in squared brackets in the new posting which I see you also removed. Very sad.

(at a guess the above was written by GeelongNews)

Materialscientist - I must agree the removal of those insertions seems tendentious editing to me. Normal thing to do would be to put cn tags in, rather than removing the entire thing. Please explain your reasoning, preferably on the article talk page. Otherwise I'll revert your edits. Greglocock (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Normal" per what policy? The added material is not neutral and involves WP:BLP and legal issues; it is not properly referenced [3]. Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
now reffed Greglocock (talk) 19:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

I really like your photography there, where do you take pictures and how did you learn the skill of photography?

I've learned through past experience, but I've made very few photographs in the last 5 years. Materialscientist (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Middle name revert change

Hi, I added a middle name to Marquese Scott's wiki page, as it is common knowledge. Not sure why you reverted that change, I did read how we write the biographies of living persons, and it seemed an ok change that did not require a citation.

Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 IP vandal

Hello, A week ago you gave the IP editor 112.205.71.15 a temporary block for vandalizing Dead or Alive Xtreme 3. The block has now expired, and they're back to to repeating their same vandalism over and over again. Could you please issue them a permanent block? There are comments from 5 different users on their talk page regarding their vandalism, in addition to the temporary block from you, and they still haven't stopped, so it appears that a more drastic solution is necessary. Thanks, CurlyWi (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for blocking 72.235.27.231 Elisfkc (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i need to add contents in this article of haifa wehbe as she request with no sources ,

Dear sir,

this information has been requested by miss haifa personally and the current are incorrect so what you need to confirm this information with out sources .  ????????

Block evader

Hi Materialscientist! Not sure if it's really worthy of acting on, but I found a block evader. Back in Sept. 2015 you blocked 99.248.70.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). They've since edited on 216.191.38.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 99.248.49.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Just FYI I guess. (For future reference, should I take issues like this to ANI?) EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus

The page is far from being neutral Talk:Belarus#Soviet/Belarus POV and certainly not featured. When I have time, I'll read it, list more errors and ask for degradation. Xx236 (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animal cruelty page

I made an edit to the [cruelty to animals] article under the "definition and viewpoints" heading. My intention was to remove some speculative and biased language. As it was, it read:

" the controversy over animal welfare was virtually non-existent. Renaissance thinker Leonardo da Vinci, however, who is widely considered one of the greatest geniuses in history, may once have written:

"I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men."

Although this quote is not found in any of his collected works, da Vinci's regard for animal welfare is well-documented. "

This is neither objective, nor sourced information. I changed it to say:

" the controversy over animal welfare was virtually non-existent. However, there were those who found the poor treatment of animals disturbing. For example, Renaissance thinker Leonardo da Vinci's regard for animal welfare is well-documented. "

Issues with IP reverts on a page you helped edit

Hi there, there's a page of a musician (Rick Nowels) with COI, SPA & promotional issues. An IP editor with no other contributions repeatedly jumps in and reverts my edits with no explanation, and when you undid this once recently, they did the same thing again. It's been 4 times since Jan and this has all the hallmarks of a potential long-running battle with a stubborn 'editor' with an ulterior motive. What would you suggest to resolve this? thanks Rayman60 (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Materialscientist&oldid=707924047"