Wikipedia:Good article nominations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Jguk (talk | contribs)
15,849 edits
Line 326: Line 326:
# {{article|Accounting period}} [[User:Jguk|jguk]] 17:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{article|Accounting period}} [[User:Jguk|jguk]] 17:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
#:{{GAOnHold|Accounting period}} lack of clarity in text, would benefit from link in references [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] 12:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
#:{{GAOnHold|Accounting period}} lack of clarity in text, would benefit from link in references [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] 12:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
#::The points listed on the talk page have now been addressed. The article is now awaiting further review. [[User:Jguk|jguk]] 18:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
# {{la|Alexander Litvinenko}} [[User:RHB|RHB]] 01:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{la|Alexander Litvinenko}} [[User:RHB|RHB]] 01:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
#:{{GAOnHold|Alexander Litvinenko}} [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 01:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
#:{{GAOnHold|Alexander Litvinenko}} [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 01:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:12, 9 January 2007

Shortcut

Good article candidates

Good article candidates
Good article candidates

Wikipedia:Good articles is a list of articles considered to be of good quality but which are unlikely to be suitable featured article candidates. The system is unbureaucratic: everyone can nominate good articles. Anyone who shows understanding of the criteria and the instructions below can review an article, as long as you are not a major contributor to the article being reviewed. Reviewers should understand the differences between the criteria for a good article and those for a featured article. This list is for proposing possible promotion of articles to the community for consideration. (Consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles if you are doing lots of reviewing.)

Please list yourself and, if you like, your special interests in the list of participants reviewing good article candidates if you're interested in joining.

How to nominate a page

Before nominating, ensure that you are a registered user and have the time to implement changes or clarifications requested by a reviewer.

If you believe an article to be good according to the 'Good Article' criteria:

  1. List the article at the bottom of the relevant section below using the syntax: # {{la|Article Name}} ~~~~ with an edit summary of "Nominating [[Article Name]]"
  2. If the article is longer than 32 kB, add '''LONG''' to it.
  3. Add {{GAnominee|2024-05-21}} to the nominated article's talk page.

When you nominate an article, please consider also choosing another article from the list to review.

How to identify long articles

Length relates to the main article prose, and articles whose body (excluding tables, lists and footnotes) is over about 32 KBytes (typically 6,000 - 9,000 words) may be considered long. A more detailed explanation of how length is measured and when it matters, can be found at Wikipedia:Article size.

Nomination categories

Arts
Everyday life
Geography
History
Mathematics and Sciences
Philosophy and religion
Social sciences
Technology
Miscellaneous nominations

How to review an article

The process for reviewing an article is:

  1. Check that you have logged in; anons may not review articles.
  2. Choose an article to review, noting:
    • You cannot choose an article if you have made significant contributions to it.
    • Nominations near the top of the lists are oldest, and should be given higher priority.
  3. Read the whole article, and decide whether it should pass or fail based on the criteria listed here.
  4. Optionally inform the nominator about the decision (see {{GANotice}} for a placeholder)

Review carefully—the standards of good articles are only as high as those of the most lenient reviewer!

Pass

If you feel the article meets the 'Good Article' criteria:

  1. Remove it from the list using the edit summary "Passed [[Article Name]]"
  2. Replace {{GAnominee}} with {{GA}} on the article's talk page. To indicate the reviewed version of a Good Article, use {{GA|oldid=nnnnnn}} on the talk page (replacing nnnnn with the id number of the reviewed version) rather than just {{GA}}.
  3. Leave a comment about your reasons for passing the article (with suggestions to improve the article, if you can).
  4. List the article on Wikipedia:Good articles under the appropriate section and update the article count at the end of the section.

Fail

If you feel the article does not meet the 'Good Article' criteria:

  1. Remove it from the list using the edit summary "Failed [[Article Name]]"
  2. Replace {{GAnominee}} with {{FailedGA|2024-05-21}} on its talk page.
  3. State which criteria it failed to meet on the article's talk page. The template {{FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{GAList}} to generate a checklist. Please be fairly specific as to the article's flaws, so that the editors are better able to correct and improve the article for another potential GA nomination.
  4. If your sole criterion for rejecting the article was a lack of appropriate references, please add the article to the Unreferenced GA Nominations list.

On Hold

You may put an article On Hold for no less than 2 and no more than 7 calendar days if only minor changes or clarifications are needed. If at least 2 days have expired without an editor addressing the concern(s), the article can be failed at any time, but a decision should be made before or around the week's end. To put an article on hold, copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:

#:{{GAOnHold|Article}} ~~~~

Also, on the talk page of the article, replace:

{{GAnominee}}

with

{{GAonhold|2024-05-21}}

Don't forget to specify on the talkpage what needs to be done, using {{GAList}} or plain text of your choosing.

Nominations

Please add your article to the bottom of the list above in the following format: # {{article|Article Name}} ~~~~

Arts

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Art and Artists

  1. Claude Monet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 04:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Vital article - could do with a review.[reply]
  • If you want an art-related topic, you might try Chaperon (headgear), listed below in History, other Johnbod 02:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture

Actors and Actresses

Books, Authors, Plays, Playwrights, and Related

  1. Fantastic Universe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Mike Christie (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Pauline Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Bobanny 06:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC) I'm in a little unfamiliar territory with this one, and am not the original writer, so any feedback would be helpful. It's been through a peer review and I believe those issues have been addressed and it is GA worthy.Bobanny 06:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. First Battle of Beruna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 05:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC) I nominated this page about a week and a half ago (when it was called "Battle of Beruna Ford" -- before I considered its proper name was more appropriate), and it was failed for not being written in the "fictional present tense." I changed this, wrote the reviewer, who wrote back, saying that the article was very in-universe, but (s)he suggested a more experienced reviewer tackle it. If the article is too in-universe, is it enough to exclude it from being a GA, and, if so, what can be done to improve it? Also -- took it to peer review and got no response, something I usually take to be a sign the article is good.[reply]
  4. LONG (58Kb) C. S. Lewis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) b_cubed 17:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC) I tried to get this peer reviewed first to iron out anything that may be wrong. Honestly, I haven't worked much on this article I just think it is better than a B rating. Thanks[reply]

Films

  1. Facing the Giants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Kghusker 02:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Pound Puppies and the Legend of Big Paw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) About the best we can do with this page (provided little has been said of this film online), but we could do with a featured nomination soon. Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 01:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Black Book (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Ilse@ 12:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold Wiki-newbie 19:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Games

  1. Serious Sam II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Rodzilla 05:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mario (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –Llama mansign here 21:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kanon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (十八|talk) 03:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Music and Musicians

  1. LONG Steely Dan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- Third nomination. Issues have yet again been addressed. NauticaShades 11:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. M3tal H3ad 05:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG Slayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Second nom, article has undergone a huge revamp since last nomination. M3tal H3ad 04:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ahn Eak-tai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Wikimachine 02:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I moved this article to its correct section here Hmains 07:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. M3tal H3ad 05:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Teemu08 21:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LONG (60+ kb) Barry Manilow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) First nomination. Much improved since last rated. Article more complete. Referenced, request for peer review, pictures added.67.98.154.56 14:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. LONG Dannii Minogue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Underneath-it-All 18:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Delta Goodrem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) TheKillerAngel 20:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC) This article is quite complete. It is well sourced and up to date. It remains NPOV. I think it is at the very least, B-class.[reply]
  8. No Doubt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ShadowHalo 00:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tenacious D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Tenacious D Fans 19:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. The Black Parade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)  Orfen User Talk | Contribs 01:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hurdy gurdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Been through peer review. Would like to move on Fenevad 17:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Television

  1. Homerpalooza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)-- Scorpion 10:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG Pauline Fowler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Where No Man Has Gone Before (TOS episode) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - no (human) comments at peer review, and am happy with it, so let's see. Morwen - Talk 17:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TNA iMPACT! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Aaru Bui DII 13:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Everyday life

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Companies and Organizations

  1. International Speedway Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Recury 18:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Education

  1. Aquinas College, Perth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Smbarnzy 11:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) delton 03:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. College of the Holy Cross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Destinvil 22:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC) LONG (49 KB)[reply]

Food

Sports

  1. Fifth Down (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) MECU≈talk 01:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Keggy the Keg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (renomination): addressed all concerns stated by M3tal H3ad except for the expansion of the lead from one to two paragraphs. The lead remains 1 paragraph long, but meets WP:LEAD, and I don't think it can expanded much more without becoming wordy and redundant. Dylan 02:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. David Beharall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Kingjamie 12:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LONGRowing (sport) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (renomination) The article has undergone extensive rewriting since last nominated, and is now in much better shape. The Spith 20:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Balkline and straight rail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Fuhghettaboutit 00:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Carom billiards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Fuhghettaboutit 00:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dominik Hašek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Muéro(talk/c) 06:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Geography

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Cartography and Topography

Locations

  1. LONG (79kb) Indonesia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Failed GAC in Sept 2006, but has been completely re-written. All aspects of Sept GA comments addressed, and much more. --Merbabu 11:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG (42kb) Providence, Rhode Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)--Loodog 04:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Tmutarakan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Belfast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Mouse Nightshirt 13:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rainham, London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Max naylor 15:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Flannan Isles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Ben MacDui (Talk) 14:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Barcelona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SP-KP 19:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. LONG Cuba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 13:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Askam and Ireleth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) J Milburn 00:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Canadian postal code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) GreenJoe 06:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page.. Orderinchaos78 05:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Alanya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Patrickneil 17:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorology

  1. Hurricane Kenna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Hurricanehink (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 2000 Sri Lanka Cyclone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Hurricanehink (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 1939 Pacific typhoon season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Hurricanehink (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Disasters

Roads and Highways

Other

History

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Military History

  1. Roman-Spartan War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Kyriakos 09:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Druworos 15:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONGAmerican Revolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) 2cd nomination --Banana04131 03:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Druworos 16:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 2006 Madrid Barajas International Airport bombing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- Wikipedical 20:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 2006 Bangkok bombings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- Wikipedical 20:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Siege of Naxos (499 BC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Kyriakos 04:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Raven banner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World History

  1. Amenhotep I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Thanatosimii 19:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Teresa Bagioli Sickles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ++Lar: t/c 19:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ghisolfi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LONG Joseph Goebbels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Pudeo (Talk) 10:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did minor copyedits on this article. It appears to meet all Good Article criteria and should be accepted. Hmains 06:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Zhou Tong (monk) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Ghostexorcist 07:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) I recently cut the page down and put the weak parts into their own article.[reply]
  2. Rune stone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 21:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LONG Alexander the Great (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 06:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Vital article & CD version article.[reply]
  4. LONG Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Bookworm857158367 21:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other

  1. Chaperon (headgear) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) A rough diamond of delightful insight into late medieval fashion. Peter Isotalo 19:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Tompw (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. George VI of the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Tompw (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LONG Edward VIII of the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Tompw (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. George V of the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Tompw (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics and Sciences

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Astronomy

  1. Owen Gingerich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Jacob1207 01:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Deyyaz [ Talk | Contribs ] 05:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Titan (moon) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 17:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Rlevse 12:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Transient lunar phenomenon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Lunokhod 10:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dark matter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 16:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LONG Solar System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Serendipodous 14:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Nominating Solar System[reply]

Earth Science

General Sciences

Mathematics

Medicine

  1. Color blindness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 15:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Science

  1. Human voice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) I'll bring the food 23:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. RNA interference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) TimVickers 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Atlantic salmon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 16:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Physical Science

  1. Glacier mass balance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --MONGO 06:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy and religion

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

  1. LONG Roman Catholic Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 08:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG Meher Baba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This article has been peer reviewed and every effort has been made to address the suggestions made. Cott12 Talk 20:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Social sciences

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Demographics

  1. Polish minority in the Czech Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Darwinek 20:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Berber people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Ling.Nut 03:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Pashtun people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)--Ling.Nut 03:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Romanians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Ling.Nut 03:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Economics

  1. LONG Affluence in the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) 42 Authorative references, easy to read graphs, encyclopedic discussion of the topic. SignaturebrendelHAPPY HOLIDAYS 21:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Chris Gardner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Referenced and any feedback would be helpful, article has undergone a huge revamp. Article more complete, request for peer review, pictures added.It is now in much better shape.
Trade2tradewell 08:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language

Law and Politics

  1. LONG Power: A New Social Analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Meets standards for GA. { Ben S. Nelson } Lucidish 19:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. LONG Singapore general election, 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This article was previously rated A-Class, but was downgraded to B-class with the comment "not a GA yet", although it had not been previously nominated for GA. With 72 references, this article deserves GA status. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 13:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LONG Singapore 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This is one of the better Singaporean B-class articles, and with 47 references, deserves a shot at GA. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 13:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. "Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Warofdreams talk 05:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Saqib Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Subwayguy 21:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. R v Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --bainer (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jerry W. Cooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Daniel Bush 00:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. LONG Armenian Revolutionary Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) I and another editor almost completely re-wrote the article. For a political party, it is pretty long and informative, with tons of citations. I believe after our hard work, it meets all the good article criteria. -- Fedayee 20:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Section Thirty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Not particularly long but then again, not the most talked about section of Canada's bill of rights. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Enlargement of the European Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 12:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. European Union legislative procedure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 12:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

War - See Military History, under history above

  1. Battle of Jilib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SeanMack 05:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Technology

Please add your nomination at the bottom of the proper list, as indicated above.

Computers

  1. Kernel (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) LONG JulesH 11:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General Transportation

  1. Ford BA Falcon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) SenatorsTalk | Contribs 05:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC) I requested this article for good article status[reply]
  2. Caterham CSR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Riguy talk/contribs 01:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC) I started this article and have almost exclusively worked to develop it. I think it has everything a good article needs.[reply]

Technology

Miscellaneous nominations (if unsure what section to use)

  1. Assata Shakur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) savidan(talk) (e@) 23:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. referencing and organization issues Jayron32 05:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Same-sex marriage in Spain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Raystorm 18:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Osama bin Laden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) igordebraga ≠ 19:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stuart Milner-Barry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (chess player / WWII codebreaker), 2nd nomination — Matt Crypto 16:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Fabio 22:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Accounting period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) jguk 17:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. lack of clarity in text, would benefit from link in references JulesH 12:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The points listed on the talk page have now been addressed. The article is now awaiting further review. jguk 18:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alexander Litvinenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) RHB 01:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. M3tal H3ad 01:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. LONG Vatican City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), peer review open J Klein my talk my contributions 23:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Seth Warshavsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) H Bruthzoo 02:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ernest Emerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Mike Searson 21:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Bodil Joensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) FT2 (Talk | email) 01:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations&oldid=99588872"