Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Darwinbish: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →‎Support: tweak for the pretties
→‎Support: Bish might not be old enough for this .. but will hopefully enjoy it anyway. :)
Line 172: Line 172:
#::• SOCK • BITE
#::• SOCK • BITE
#:&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
#:&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
#'''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82kJH69HnHA Old School] Support''' — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)


=====Oppose=====
=====Oppose=====

Revision as of 02:19, 17 August 2012

Darwinbish

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (83/3/1); Scheduled to end late Devonian period (UTC), era of fish developing legs!

[The good twin Darwinfish takes his life in his hands (hands..??), updates the recent Opposes too, runs off. ] Naughty Rexxs! darwinfish 20:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination

Darwinbish (talk · contribs) – My lords, ladies and jellyspoons, assorted zoo animals, kitchen equipment and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri, I am both pleased and proud (and standing on a chair) to present to you Darwinbish. From her first appearance as an alternative account of Bishapod in October 2010, Darwinbish has proved herself to be a resourceful wikipedian, creating her own custom signature little ankle biter (why do you think I'm standing on this chair), and has even had a go at creating her own sock User:Umlaut-Löttchen (although that hasn't gone so well, has it young fishersnapper). After acting as my campaign manager in the recent Arbitration Committee Elections, where I ran on the ticket "Vote for me or the ankles get it!" Darwinbish is now fully au-fait with all the relevant policies and ready to take her place as a fearsome vandal fighter, even handed dispute resolver, and all round good fish-with-legs. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2010 (UTC) *Can I get down off this chair now?[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
  • Er, could us twins run as a double feature, please? Complement each other! Good twin, evil twin! darwinfish 14:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC). [reply]
I'll NomNomNom you if you like Fainites barleyscribs 19:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: [Judiciously. ] Mainly WP:BITE-ing. darwinbish BITE 20:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: [Checks her contribs. Goes a little cross-eyed. ] Uh, well... Hmm. Let's see. My top achievements include teaching Sinebot better manners,[1] working to remove crap browsers among wikipedians,[2] and teaching use of logic on Wikipedia, sorely needed! Especially undistributed muddle! [3]
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Conflicts? Stress? Oh, no, never! darwinbish BITE 20:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Answer P.S. On second thoughts, there will soon be stress and conflicts if you miserable lot don't start supporting below! Come on! Chop-chop! darwinbish BITE 20:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
The sockpuppetry can be forgiven, but can you cite any peer-reviewed sources showing you have never ever been under stress on this website? I only ask because I don't understand how ankle biting can be stress-free. Or is this a means of skirting stress? If so, how does this jibe with WP:BITE? Gwen Gale (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is stress-free for biter, stressful for bitee. [Takes explanatory nibble out of Gwen's ankle. ] See? Important qualification: only works for evil biters. Me uniquely evil, just the admin Wikipedia needs! Go support, mrs bitee, or run for the hills! [Approaches in a threatening manner, hoping Gwen is now stressed enough to forget about the peer-reviewed sources. And what was that weird bit about wearing a skirt? Obligatory for admins? This is trickier than db thought! ] little ankle biter 21:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Skirts, ok, that's meaningful. As to length, are you hopelessly wanton, or are you a hopeless prude? At which level of Kohlberg's stages of moral development does this put you and why would this boost one's trust in you with the bit? I mean, ankles show at both lengths. Is this about biting, or being bitten? Gwen Gale (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Read more of this fascinating discussion at the talk page. --RexxS (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gwen, look at Little Ankle Biter shape. How wear skirt at all? I wear cosy... all-in-one Bish-sack for adminning. Tex illustrate, please? Get out paintbox, Tex! Chop-chop! ... Why Tex not here? darwinbish BITE 13:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
[User:Darwinfish Fridge Magnet admiringly:] Can I have Boy-sack? Mr Tex? darwinfish 13:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Will you stop changing the subject, you silly minnow? Go support! darwinbish BITE 13:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
[darwinfish flees. ]
As requested, here is Darwinbish in her custom made all-in-one Bish-sack (or Bish-shopping bag) made exclusively for adminning. Tex (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Oh! Much fetching on you! Why can't all admins be evil and hide in brown paper shopping bags? Need Darwinbish, show the way. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[Pleased. ] Much better than Elen arbcom robe![4] Tail sticking out handsomely! darwinbish BITE 23:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Additional optional question from Gooch
4. Why you bite you twin? Goochy Oooh, pretty! 16:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A: [Surprised. ] Why not? darwinbish BITE 20:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Additional optional question from SirFozzie
5. Well, I can ask this question, since I'm wearing leg greaves and iron boots. You have shown remarkable prowess at biting ankles.. but I think people here at RfA are looking for a variety of editing experience. If/when you are made an administrator, would you be willing to broaden your experience to biting other things such as fingers, arms, and unmentionable parts? SirFozzie (talk) 07:49, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A: Interesting question, gimme a minute to think... [Talking incessantly to distract, Darwinbish sidles around and bites SirFozzie shrewdly on the ass. ] Not sure, I think I'll stick with the ankles, there's often quite a queue on the anklebiting board... [Is vastly amused at own wit. ] Hee hee hee! darwinbish BITE 14:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Additional optional questions from Kiore
6 What was the process of Abiogenesis on earth?
A: Users arose from inanimate matter through creation of socks. Thus twins created by Bishapod,[5] Bishapod created by Bishzilla,[6] Bishzilla created by Bishonen [how did that happen?] und so weiter, filling up inanimate project with milling of myriad live socks. darwinbish BITE 19:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
7 How did sexual reproduction evolve?
A Hmmmm. Uh... step by step? darwinbish BITE 19:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
7A Did it evolve once or separately for plants and animals
Plants fuck too? This a very educational RFA! darwinbish BITE 19:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
8 Big crunch or Heat death of the universe?
A Small crunch, due to crunching of innumerable sharp little teeth. darwinbish BITE 19:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
9 (Dis)Prove P=NP
A Still working on that one! Is needed for proper use of block button...? darwinbish BITE 19:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Kiore (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review her contributions before commenting.

Discussion

Support
  1. Nominator support Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC) — Elen of the Roads (talk • contribs) has made few or no other important edits outside this topic. [reply]
    What else would be "important"? SPAs have good faith too, please don't bash SPAs, that's Darwinbish's job. BP Bag (talk)
  2. With nori. Jehochman Talk 00:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support sister sushi. [Runs for the hills, giggling. ] darwinfish 13:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
  4. Support, Tuna nigirizushi, big dollop of wasabi. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. strong support: An intelligent and useful editor, with a thoughtful insight seldom seen on Wikipedia. Would make an admirable Admin. Lady Catherine Rollbacker-de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 14:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support - God help all ankles! Tex (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hyper-mega-strong support – will make an excellent admin as long as Malleus doesn't put any more ideas into her head --RexxS (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    No fear. No room for insane Malleus in my head! [7] darwinbish BITE 21:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
  8. Support: Ratio of usertalk to article edits is NaN. So this editor seems to meet current criteria for adminship. MastCell Talk 17:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support - Why not? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Support It's been nearly 30 seconds since I asked my questions & she's refrained from answering them. Definitely admin material Kiore (talk) 08:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong support Brilliant answers to my questions. I now believe she should be appointed Wikipedia Co-founder to replace He-who-must-not-be-named. Kiore (talk) 06:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support If she gets out of line, my sarong doubles as a fishnet. KrakatoaKatie 21:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Evidence required. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sock-of-sock support. Give teh ankle-biter moar teeth. Srsly, Gold Hat (talk) 10:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support I thought she was already an administrator, at least since the K-T event. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Not quite as much of an extinction as some people think. --T-RexxS (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support per nom nom nom. --127.0.0.1 (talk)
  15. Support, owing to Darwinbish's undestanding of entropy as shown in answer to q#8. BP Bag (talk 10:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support...Obvious support to eliminate Big Crunch.--MONGO 16:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hell yeah! Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support: I have every confidence this candidate would not misuse the tools. Eat them, maybe, but not misuse them. With regard to the concern that the candidate is non-human, in reviewing the current list of admins I note the presence of a chihuahua, a porpoise, a mouse, an eagle, a crustacian, a gerbil, and most to the point a dragon, among others, so that precedent was set a long time ago. I trust Bishzilla to know when to give users a gentle hug and when it's time for something more like aggressive taunting with a suggestion of death. I hope that's okay, 'zilla, please don't kill me. Newyorkbrad 13:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. In the interest of not being burnt to a crisp, I Support this candidate. (If you need help answering optional questions, you can use my cheat sheet). NoSeptember 13:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  20. Support. Always will support fellow monsters. Fut.zilla. 17:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. I, for one, welcome our new monster overlords. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 17:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Weak Support - Mentions about the fact that candidate graduated from admin school with a bare minimum of collateral damage, maiming only three newbies raise concerns of disregard for WP:BITE but I trust the candidate has left all that behind. Roadmr (t|c) 17:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support, the spinning head in the signature suggest sufficient experience with images. Kusma (討論) 17:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Petition firmly accepted. Arise Sir Bishzilla! - Francis Tyers · 17:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Girls can't be knights now? What kind of terrible world of 1382 do you suppose are we living in?! - Francis Tyers · 18:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Kill all humans - with so many of them editing it's obviously gonna cause a near catastrophe of a systemic bias, 'bout time they were culled. So, Bishzilla's eaten a few editors here and there, <BURP> who hasn't, all it taught me was Mexicans give me indigestion... I stand in awe of Bishzilla, well I pretty much have to stand for everything since Bishzilla ate my furniture last week, I'm not complaining mind you, it was only fair, it was all paisley. The answer to quesiton one really swung it for me though.--Alf melmac 18:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Would normally oppose or not vote at all because of candidate's low edit count, but am happy to support on condition that you promise to be as like Bishonen as possible! Musical Linguist 19:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    SUPPORT!!!! I see that this has been closed! The end of the world is now a likely prospect! I told you folks to vote suppport...think of your homes, your children, your goldfish! Don't you see what you have done?! Oh, the horror, the horror!--Bigfoot 19:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Naughty editor already voted! LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Obviously this voter had already voted, given the date stamp, but they had also already voted in the present election... It's not easy cleriking these things! LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't be so fussy. Darwinbish is hungry, enough wishy washy fuffle and lungery. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Founder bit or fight. Being fussy is such a drag. Sally LeRoy talk 12:30, 29 May 1968 (PST)
  28. Fast-track to Steward. ZILLA NEED TOOLS. — Werdna talk 04:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support. Thought already was admin. Behaves like admin. Creature from the Black Lagoon. 08:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Strong support, right attitude, convincing answers to the questions. We need more IRC admins to block the fickle and ill-informed users who forget where they belong. --Irpen 18:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support all fire breathing dragons. Dragons flight 23:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Reluctant support I'm afraid that the candidate's answers to my questions were perhaps too calm and collected. I feel that I cannot have confidence in an administrator who cannot be relied on to over-react and act rationally. But most of all, I am afraid. Hence the reluctant support. Don't want to end up with bits of chewed up cat or hedgehog in my garden, after all. They play havoc with the Flymo blades. Bubba hotep 22:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Saurpport. Adminship should be no big deal, although the prospective admin candidate seems to be a big deal. Besides, we need more rouge admins. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 02:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Whatever. Bring it on Zilla baby, bring it on. King Kong 16:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support per affirmative action for the 'Zilla community (and who could oppose such a fine looking specimen?) Sarah 16:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Conlaudatio De bene esse gaillimhConas tá tú? 03:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Super strong (please don't eat me) support (does it count under duress?) Bastiq▼e demandez 19:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support. At first I was concerned that this user had no regard for human life and wished to exterminate and enslave our race. But that spinning head just goes around and around. It's crazy. Deco 19:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Brilliant contributor. I like her attitude. Picaroon 20:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Put me in your pocket-support! Nice and cozy, with WLAN, I've been told. Rather be in there than be in Tokyo! – Elizzilla • T • C • 22:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Is it the case that the population of 'zillas on the 'pedia has more than quadrupled recently? If this goes on, they are soon going to become a mere commodity. Really. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Speaking for self, me have no idea what little Fut.zilla talk about. NotAZilla 23:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support. Most RfA are decided by weight of numbers. This one is to be decided by weight. CFTBL 23:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Ideogram 17:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Please flee in terror in an orderly manner. >Radiant< 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Keep user passes WP:MONSTER Glen 08:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. RARRRRRRR! Just H 10:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Strongest Possible Support. I have every confidence that Bizhilla will be unable to abuse (or for that matter, even use) the tools. ;) – Lantoka (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Why are people not taking this nomination with the seriousness it deserves? OMGGGSHHH!!!!1!!!1!!one!!!! not one already? 81 featured edits, been here nearly 4 months, I definitely trust the candidate. --Majorly (o rly?) 11:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. I already thought you were one, no really, I really already did support - WP:100 here we come... The Rambling Man 13:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Extreme reptilian support: it's time we taught these silly primates a lesson and squashed their rambunctious uppitiness. oops, I stepped on another…where can I wipe my claws? HTH HAND —NotACat…NotACatAtAll
  50. HYPER STRONG SUPPORT From me and my WMD Mecha-Saur. "Let's Roll !!!!". Hope you make a GREAT Admin. Martial Law 20:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support. Just the sort of gumption we're looking for these days. Mackensen (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support. Opposing might make him angry. An angry Bishzilla? (gulp!) Grutness...wha? 00:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Bishzilla is female. Otherwise, it would be Bishzillo. O:-) Ben Aveling 10:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Are you asking for a BATTLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLE??? Administrators these days need to know not to be combative. They must end disputes with one mighty strike of Nuclear Breath rage! --InShaneee 07:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Supppport – Gourock garden gnome considers candidate shows fine blend of tact and diplomacy, ideal for admin. .. dave souza, talk 02:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Suport – A nice and funny user. Make me smile every time i read the comments of Bishzilla. --SkyWalker 15:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Lurker Support - I thought she already was one! --Tex Talk 15:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Strong support - blimey, you weren't one already? You clearly have a revolutionary understanding of teh_bloxor_policy ([8]). Even though the concerns NOT outlined by Radiant! that your MediaWiki Talk space edit count is far too low are totally legitimate, I think you can be trusted. - Zeibura Talk 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. It's only fair, after all, she was singularly responsible for my RfB success. Andre (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support while trembling in fear. Bishzilla promise not to eat me? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support with extreme prejudice - We need more actively homicidal admins. John Carter (talk) 01:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Zooboomafoo! (X! · talk)  · @050  ·  00:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Hmmm ..., aggressive, power-hungry, barely evolved ... seems to tick all the boxes. pablo 23:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Vote against intelligent design. Tony (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Just to stop the endless nagging Because we should give "ankle biting" some teeth. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Fish with legs and teeth bad, but Master threaten stop work on female monster if not vote support. So support. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 21:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Chortle. Subtle hint work surprisingly well! Excellent consensus for success of request, even socks and monsters support this candidate! Where are the crats? darwinbish BITE 23:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  66. DARWINBISH is evolving! Congratulations! Your DARWINBISH evolved into MORGANBISH! MORGANBISH wants to learn "ADMIN". but MORGANBISH can't learn more than four moves.

    Delete an old move?

    • EDIT   • REVERT
    • SOCK • BITE
    — Coren (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Old School Support — Ched :  ?  02:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Anyone who is supported by all the fine, distinguished and - let me be honest here - desirable persons noted above (excepting one miscreant, obviously) cannot be all bad; I therefore oppose, as I only want truly evil editors to be given the flags presently. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[obligatory oppose baiting:] Well, at least you won't have the expense of having to buy shoes any more. --RexxS (talk) 03:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral comment I hope you wear very thick socks, LHvU. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd recommend these instead. --RexxS (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shshsh! WP:BEANS! :O Gwen Gale (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[obligatory oppose baiting response:] I have necessarily amended my oppose comment... LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When was the last time you swapped socks? Gwen Gale (talk) 10:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At a Red Hot Chilli Peppers concert. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose with valid reason - Was found to be editing Wikipedia. That is always the reason to oppose ;) Mitch32(Transportation Historian) 01:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong oppose. User has not learned proper bite inhibition. DS (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Nom nom nom, as per nom and Fainites. Horologium (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. .....Natural selection should render this unnecessary ;) Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, you're probably right, I'll just use the tools I have. [Thoughtfully starts to file her sharp little teeth. ] People who have voted Oppose or Neutral here will be the first to go! darwinbish BITE 09:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]
    I'd better find me some of these... ;) Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:29, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Darwinbish&oldid=507777205"