School-leaving age
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Youth rights |
---|
The dropping out age is the minimum age a person is legally allowed to drop out of compulsory secondary education. Most countries have their school leaving age set the same as their minimum full-time employment age, thus allowing smooth transition from education into employment, whilst a few have it set just below the age at which a person is allowed to be employed.
In contrast, there are numerous countries that have several years between their school leaving age and their legal minimum employment age, thus in some cases preventing any such transition for several years. Countries which have their employment age set below the school leaving age (mostly developing countries), risk giving children the opportunity to leave their education early to earn money for their families.
Leaving age by country
Some countries have different leaving or employment ages, but in certain countries like China and Japan, the average age at which people graduate is 15, depending upon part-time or full-time learning or employment. The table below states the school leaving ages in countries across the world and their respective minimum employment age, showing a comparison of how many countries have synchronised these ages. All information is taken from the Right to Education Project's table unless otherwise indicated.[1]
Legend
Color legend | Ages legend |
School leaving age higher |
0 denotes education is not compulsory. (13) denotes part-time employment available from 13 |
Employment age higher |
0 denotes no minimum employment age as children could be, in theory, employed from birth |
Both ages synchronised |
― denotes no information available |
No information / No age set |
? denotes the age set is unknown |
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
# | Country | De jure | Education/ Employment gap |
Year | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
School leaving age | Employment age
Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA|- |
Oceania
# | Country | De jure | Education/ Employment gap |
Year | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
School leaving age | Employment age
Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA |
South America
# | Country | De jure | Education/ Employment gap |
Year | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
School leaving age | Employment age
Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA |
School retention by country
Country | 2009 OECD[2] |
1986 Michael Hill[3] | |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage in full-time education (aged 15-19) |
Percentage in full-time education (aged 17) |
Minimum leaving age limit | |
![]() |
78 | 50 | 15 |
![]() |
84 | ||
![]() |
91 | 86 | 16 |
![]() |
70 | ||
![]() |
80 | 79 | 15/16 |
![]() |
93 | ||
![]() |
89 | 75 | 16/17 |
![]() |
89 | ||
![]() |
90 | 91 | 17 |
![]() |
90 | 80 | 16 |
![]() |
93 | 100 | 16 |
![]() |
88 | 55 | 14.5 |
![]() |
93 | ||
![]() |
88 | 41 | 15 |
![]() |
83 | ||
![]() |
69 | ||
![]() |
84 | 46 | 14 |
![]() |
91 | 15 | |
![]() |
95 | ||
![]() |
61 | ||
![]() |
90 | 87 | 16 |
![]() |
73 | 54 | 15 |
![]() |
81 | 76 | 16 |
OECD average | 84 | ||
![]() |
94 | ||
![]() |
85 | ||
![]() |
91 | ||
![]() |
94 | ||
![]() |
80 | 53 | 14 |
![]() |
88 | 86 | 16 |
![]() |
85 | 83 | 15/16 |
![]() |
56 | ||
![]() |
78 | 49 | 16 |
![]() |
85 | 89 | 17 |
See also
Notes
- ^ "Country Table - At What Age?...are school-children employed, married and taken to court". The Right to Education Project. Retrieved 2014-01-02.
- ^ Skills beyond school. p. 343. OECD. 2011
- ^ Percentage in full-time education at 17 related to termination ages for compulsory education in various countries (1986) Social Policy: A comparative analysis by Michael Hill