User talk:117.120.18.132

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Welcome Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (117.120.18.132) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! «CharlieEchoTango» 02:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC) From WP:Help desk : Contributions by Companies I am the Head of Corporate Affairs for a large company. I note our Wikipedia entry is reasonably sparse. Do you have any objection to us adding purely factual, unbiased information to that entry in the format that is followed for other large organisations? I appreciate you don't want an ad, or any Corporate `puff' type entries - just factual information. Thanks you. David Jamieson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.18.132 (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Hi Mr. Jamieson, if I may suggest, it would be preferable to submit the content to the talk page of the article first, so that neutral editors can review the potential additions and add them (or reject them based on one of many reasons, such as : copyright violations, non neutral point of view, etc). You could also edit the article yourself, even though this could be considered a conflict of interest. May I ask which article you want to edit? «CharlieEchoTango» 02:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Sure - this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfield_Services. The talk page may be the best option. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.18.132 (talk) 02:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Good! Add your content here and I or another editor will add it, if it's properly sourced and within wikipedia's guidelines. Also, on talk pages, remember to sign your posts using four tildes ~~~~. Thanks! «CharlieEchoTango» 02:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC) December 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Woy Woy, New South Wales, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. February 2011 Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page AGL Energy do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Hi Zapletal. Welcome to Wikipedia! When you post a comment on a Talk page please finish by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. (The tilde can be found at the top left of most keyboards.) We all have to do this and it automatically prints our Wikipedia name. It will automatically print your IP address at the end of your message. If you also want to leave your name "Zapletal" at the end of your messages you can type it immediately before the four tildes. Better still, why not create a User account for yourself. You could use the name Zapletal if you wish. It is free and enables other Users to contact you directly on your User talk page. Happy editing! Dolphin (t) 02:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eating disorder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 02:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Drag and lift in unsteady flow Hi Zapletal, from flying through turbulence you know what a rough ride unsteady flow can give. Besides the variations in the instantaneous drag and lift by the flow variations, there are also inertia forces (see added mass) due to the temporal accelerations of the flow (as seen from the frame of reference moving with the plane). Even according to potential flow theory (without circulation), there are forces in unsteady flow (d'Alembert's paradox is for steady flow). What to call drag & lift in the unsteady case is up to convention, but for an asymmetric airfoil both force components -- in the direction of the flow acceleration vector and perpendicular -- are present. Unsteady flow and resulting forces, including added-mass effects, is treated in e.g. Joseph Katz & Allen Plotkin (2001) Low-speed aerodynamics, ISBN 0521665523. See also Küssner effect and the references there. I think Wikipedia may be expanded and improved with respect to these unsteady effects on aerodynamic forces. The flow field formation in a starting flow around an airfoil is described in e.g. Batchelor (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics ISBN 0521663962. Cheers, Crowsnest (talk) 07:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC) I will copy this also to Talk:Lift (force). -- Crowsnest (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC) March 2011 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shinkansen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kerry Packer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rupert Murdoch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerry Packer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 02:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rupert Murdoch, you may be blocked from editing. See this edit. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. May 2011 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Armadale with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 02:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gropecunt Lane, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kafka Liz (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. July 2011 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Richard Branson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 02:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Richard Branson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 02:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Richard Branson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Richard Branson. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 02:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism, as done at Richard Branson. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. RL0919 (talk) 02:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC) September 2011 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abhishek Bachchan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –BruTe Talk 07:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles. For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used. In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC) April 2012 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maynard (Australian media personality), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC) May 2012 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sunflower seastar with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sunflower seastar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 07:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ruler appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Bgpaulus (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruler with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ducknish (talk) 02:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kevin Sorbo with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC) June 2012 Your recent editing history at Garry Kasparov shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Garry Kasparov. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Garry Kasparov, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. I think it's not wrong to observe that any character of "war" prior to imposition of actions by you. Reflect and come back and comment. This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Talk:Garry Kasparov, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This includes on the talk page, and this is why you have been reverted. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You must find several more reliable source than Wikiquote before we can accept it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kubigula (talk) 04:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 117.120.18.132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Sourced well enough for Wikiquote (and the sourcings are reported faithfully in each occurrence there) is sourced well enough for Wikipedia and always has been. What on Earth are you going on about with that? Decline reason: Does not address the reasons for the block. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Wikiquote is not reliable, because wikis are not reliable. In any case, you edit warred it in instead of discussing with us.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Even if reliable sources were found, adding this gravely insulting commentary from one of his rivals would be a violation of WP:WEIGHT. I don't think this material can ever be acceptable in Kasparov's BLP. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) July 2012 Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Protector of Aborigines was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 00:48, 28 July 2012 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Protector of Aborigines with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. hajatvrc @ 01:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC) August 2012 Hello, I'm R000t. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Impalement, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, I am r000t (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Impalement with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I am r000t (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arc welding, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Illusory superiority Your additions are original research. Wikipedia content must be verifiable and need to be reliably sourced. May I suggest you review the five pillars of wikipedia Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC) October 2012 Hello, I'm Grammarxxx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rare earth element because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 04:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Biodynamic agriculture because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Daniel Stern (psychologist)

Hi, and thank you for your edit of Daniel Stern (psychologist). However, you didn't state a source. Could you please add a source? If you don't know how, take a look at WP:referencing for beginners. Thank you! Lova Falk talk 13:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Racerx11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Joseph Therry, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 02:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Joseph Therry with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 02:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chutznik (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bourke, New South Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Andrew³²⁷ 00:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Marist Brothers schools , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wallet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Queensland Rail, you may be blocked from editing. Dawnseeker2000 02:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mouse (computing). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mouse (computing), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jojalozzo 02:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Crucifix may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Elemented9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Crucifix, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Element₉. _TALK 00:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Knock-knock joke, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Standing Room Only. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation do's and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, which should not end with punctuation
• Use only one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Do not add red links unless used in an article, and include a "blue link"
• Do not pipe links—keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links

Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Standing Room Only

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Three Blind Mice because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 06:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brainstem may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[spinal cord]]. It is usually described as including the [[medulla oblongata]] (myelencephalon), [[ponsf metencephalon), and [[midbrain]] (mesencephalon).<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|title = brainstem|encyclopedia = The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Camel racing because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 04:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Cinder cone ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

April 2015

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Pen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Roman aqueduct— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Aqueduct with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Roman aqueduct with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roman aqueduct. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Howard Arkley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Hello, I'm DiscantX. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Theatre of ancient Greece— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  DiscantX 04:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hudson Milnes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hudson Milnes, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm Pepper. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Andy Penn— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. "Pepper" @ 03:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andy Penn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. "Pepper" @ 03:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hudson Milnes

Hello, 117.120.18.132. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hudson Milnes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 15:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

---