Jump to content

User talk:Alansohn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A Nobody (talk | contribs)
DYK help?: reply to Alansohn
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>WEE-GEE</big>
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 19
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:Alansohn/Archive %(counter)d
}}
'''Welcome!'''


{{Archive box|[[User talk:Alansohn/Archive_1|'''1) August 30, 2005 - February 1, 2006''']]<br>
{{Archive box|[[User talk:Alansohn/Archive_1|'''1) August 30, 2005 - February 1, 2006''']]<br>

Revision as of 19:36, 27 March 2009

WEE-GEE

Hearbeat

I don not know what I can do, I feel really bullied on this site!!! I feel excluded I have submitted and revised my Heartbeat article 5 times as not to offend anyone removing emotive language, and Ever Heard of Freedom of Speech? I have thoroughly checked everything put forward making sure with at least 10 people first who do have different opinions on this matter if they are happy and unoffended by the article. I am becoming fustrated with it keep being removed adam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamthescout (talkcontribs) 17:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply 9on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing revisions to Linux article

I left a clear edit summary as to why I made that edit. It was POV-pushing for Linux, and contained innacurate information. I noticed you have some anti-anonymous propaganda on your user page. Please don't allow your prejudism towards anonymous editors to drive your edit decisions. My edit had thought behind it, and if you had taken a second to read the edit summary, you would've seen that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.105.121.125 (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kondratuk

I'm the user that keeps deleting the play house 22 section of the East Brunswick, NJ article. It was a relevant and necessary edit because I live in East Brunswick and the it's been announced that the project for rebuilding playhouse 22 has been stopped and the playhouse will no longer be an attraction to our town. So please do not block me for making important edits. If you have any questions or comments please email me @ paulkondratuk@hotmail.com. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.70.48 (talkcontribs)

Jeff Behar

I didnt know how to email you, for the information about Jeff behar and hillsborogh


Professional bodybuilders | Mister-olympia, see: http://mister-olympia.bganzeige.de/professional-bodybuilders


also see:

http://botw.org/top/Sports/Strength_Sports/Bodybuilding/Personal_Page/

You can also just google him, jeff behar writer, jeff behar bodybuilder, jeff Behar NASA, jeff Behar ceo of Musclemagfitness.com

He graduated from hillsboro, 1983.

U can also see him on TV, on comedy central by googling his name and comedy central or going here:

http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=70301&title=golds-gym

U can also confirm by checking the hillsboro area at classmates.com


Sorry for having to wroite in here. I did not know how else to email you back with the information you requested.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to World government has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.

Fuck you! read the bloody message. this is not to cite your own info. source it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jor Monn (talkcontribs)

Re: Derek Thompson (sports commentator)

I have recieved a messege from you about editing Derek Thompson (sports commentator), I have never heard of this man, nor have I ever edited his article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.91.20 (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph Kahn (shipping executive)

Number 298 (185 create/expand - 113 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 29 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Kahn (shipping executive), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for Howard Pack

Number 299 (186 create/expand - 113 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 29 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Howard Pack, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

wpnj members

What do you think of this? shirulashem (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there. Alansohn (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Do you realize wiki-edit power is a paradox - one that no one interest it power, wants! You will never be freed of your ignorance - pitty be unto you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.68.7 (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fruity

why did you change fruity >=( fruity is a word

Gurumayi Chidvilasananda

Also, you seem to know the ropes within the wikipedia. I submit you another case, theringess is again and again suppressing any independent material about Gurumayi Chidvilasananda including the transcriptiion of an article of the new yorker. Please study the history of the article. 82.67.232.89 (talk)

You can join me at cognominal@gmail.com

I need to be banned

I can't stop vandalizing pages. If you don't ban me I will do it again. It's a serious problem, I can't stop. Please do me a favor and ban me from editing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.160.148.51 (talkcontribs)


Lol..this is too hilarious! You people are crazy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.78.146 (talk) 04:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me alone

Look at the guy who I edited. I don't want you to bother me. Just leave me alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobburson (talkcontribs)

Stop vandalizing and we've got a deal. Alansohn (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DO U CARE SO MUCH IF PPL VANDALIZE UR SUCH A GEEK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathgeek515 (talkcontribs) 23:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks....

...for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

..again for reverting the vandalism to my userpage; 3rd time wins a cookie. :)) Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barn Star

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For tirelessly reverting vandalism...and beating me to it. :)


Gharjamai

You reverted my edit to Gharjamai while I was updating the talk page. Please reconsider. Anish7 (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick response. Anish7 (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my 'undo' of the previous user's uninformed vandalism - Pls refer to the history of the article and the talk/discussion page before just editing. Thanks. Xghostfacexx (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Wu

Nobody loves this poor poor soul. This is his cry for help, or in the words of Gary Larson, Helf.

question

what did i do wrong i added on more about the soup all of it was true why should i be blocked

Appology

I appologize on behalf of my school for all the vandalism that comes out of this IP address. There are a lot of stupid people here, and they like to mess things up. Its a high school, you see... Immortal Z (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peer Portner

Number 384 (261 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On February 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peer Portner, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you...

... for recognizing that my redirecting a non-notable song title by Weird Al Yankovic to the album that contains the song is in good faith, as my contribution history demonstrates. In this case, the redirection is superior to an AfD, which would have happened if the redirect is not sustained. Thanks again. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the article back to its original content. Such a change should not be performed on a long-standing article without any discussion for gathering consensus. Gail (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble94's Userboxes

I was banned, and both the user and talk pages are now gone. I have the right to take down MY content if I so choose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.144.15 (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You

I really don't like you. Why would you delete my Demi article?! and then say i was "vandilizing." Seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LexiThePickle (talkcontribs) 23:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New bio stub

Hi Alansohn. Did you see Nonnie Moore? Best, Bongomatic 23:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonnie Moore is what led me to write to you. Thanks for the notification and I have already expanded the article. Alansohn (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the edit made to my user talk page. Before I even saw it! All the best. Bobo. 02:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Census Bureau map of Cranbury Township, New Jersey.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Census Bureau map of Cranbury Township, New Jersey.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Census Bureau map of Newfield, New Jersey.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Census Bureau map of Newfield, New Jersey.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you once edited Eric Kandel, if you are interested in his work, perhaps you can add content to Fred M. Levin, who is an believe in the work of Eric Kandel. Mwalla (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)mwalla[reply]

I think you've got the wrong user. I think you want Canadianeh1. Matt (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were correct. User had already been blocked before I could repaste the note. Alansohn (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reverts!

Hello. Thank you for the revert ([1]) of my "fan club." Your speedy anti-vandal action is much appreciated! Thanks! Kralizec! (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for International Trot

Number 385 (262 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On February 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International Trot, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joe Goldstein

Number 386 (263 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On February 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Goldstein, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 02:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested...

...in the edits of Tpdtruth (talk · contribs). -- Y not? 20:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some bios

Hi Alansohn. If you're interested, please take a look at:

  • Noel Martin. Recently deceased. Old article, not complete (I added some of the basic facts behind the more important color). Could use improvements, other refs.
  • William Jorden. Recently deceased. New article, not quite a stub anymore. Would benefit from additional references and perspectives.

Tx, Bongomatic 14:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Faze TV (TV channel)

Number 387 (264 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On February 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Faze TV (TV channel), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Another bio

Hi Alsonsohn, added a stub for Rhena Schweitzer Miller. Bongomatic 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Its humor man, humor. user:GaryDaFatSnail does not need the welcome box, and if he does he can look in his history. The rest is a response to whats on my page, as well as a greeting. Is all that illegal? I thought not. Please undo it and remove the warning you placed on my page. --BACON EXPLOSION (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up for you

Requesting editor obviously inexperienced, now understands and accepts the situation so just an FYI as it was initially phrased with your name directly Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Abuse_by_.22Alansohn.22. best. Mfield (talk) 19:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply there. Alansohn (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct details

The new sequal OVA of "Higurashi no naku koro ni" is titled "Higurashi no naku koro ni Rei" NOT "Higurashi no naku koro ni Chikai" the official site states it is titled "Rei", it is mentioned nowhere that it is called "Chikai". Also the OVA has now been released and in the Opening credits, the title song, sung by "Eiko Shimamiya" is listed as "Super scription of data" NOT "Chikai". Please revise your details and check more official sources next time before changing back to "Chikai" again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yekim (talkcontribs) 04:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stanley Dancer

Number 388 (265 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stanley Dancer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Su Mac Lad

Number 389 (266 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Su Mac Lad, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nevele Pride

Number 390 (267 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nevele Pride, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Harness Horse of the Year

Number 391 (268 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harness Horse of the Year, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Keystone Ore

Number 392 (269 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Keystone Ore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're gonna love . . .

Bongomatic 05:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go through both. I had a busy weekend, but I will do my best to catch up over the next few days. Alansohn (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK twofer

Numbers 393 and 394 (271 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 2 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles Alfred J. Kahn, and Citizens' Committee for Children, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Robert Robideau

Number 395 (272 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Robideau, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for J. Max Bond, Jr.

Number 396 (273 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article J. Max Bond, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Derrell Palmer

Number 397 (274 create/expand - 123 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Derrell Palmer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Good work! Great work on the DYKs. --Kanonkas :  Talk  23:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

unconstructive?

why for is you say unconstuctive of my edit. i try help, english teacher show us with help from she. i thank you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.142.130 (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 02:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joke user?

Hi. I see you warned this user: User talk:Da best editor on 26th Feb. They don't seem to do anything constructive, but have amassed many warnings. I don't really see the point in their continuing to use Wikipedia as their personal joke project. Can you please tell me what is supposed to happen next, procedurally? Thanks and best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK thanks, I think I've got it. Warning 4 then take it to AIV if that does not work, right? Thanks, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant, thank you very much. Cheers DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your excellent work in removing vandalism with Huggle. You beat me to reverting vandalism several times each day. GT5162 (talk) 17:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for American Airlines Flight 6780

Number 398 (274 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 3 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article American Airlines Flight 6780, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

nomming as well? Victuallers (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

If I see a worthy article that catches my eye. This one had a very interesting hook AND a New Jersey connection. Alansohn (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. :) Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the least I can do. Alansohn (talk) 04:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My change to Vitamin B17

From what I have read it is not toxic and I believe it can cure cancer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ticklememo (talkcontribs) 21:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there is a source from the National Institutes of Health that says it is, which you removed. If you have reliable sources that say it's non-toxic it should be added to show that there is a difference in opinion on the issue. Please do not remove the sourced claim of toxicity. Alansohn (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Here

Hey man, just a quick note to tell you that the IP edit in that link is fine and just here to tell you that I've reverted it. Hope you don't mind. I know how difficult it is to see if an edit is decent or not on Huggle so no worries about that :-) Regards and take, friend. ScarianCall me Pat! 21:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the catch and the correction. Alansohn (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: edit to SRI International

My edit was constructive. You should put it back, or act on it. Or do something else, if that's the officially preferred way to handle a case like this. Nothing in the rest of the paragraph says anything about the subject of the heading which is correctly defined in the first sentence; it's all about clairvoyance and telepathy, nothing about psychokinesis. I for one prefer having some notation inline with the text I'm reading to point out that there's a problem with it.

As you can see, I'm not in the mood to be diplomatic, but I'm not argumentative or aggressive either. I am getting a little tired of the bureaucracy on Wikipedia, and the really bad grammar on most of the article pages. I guess that's one of the places where a professionally reviewed encyclopedia like Britannica has an advantage. On the upside, I like that if I find something wrong I can correct it. . . or at least tag it. Right?? OK, so I guess I am a little annoyed. I wonder if you're annoyed by some of the human-but-not-productive entanglements around here, too. Like, say, vandalism, which it appears is what you were going after; and that's good. Anyway, I won't be back at SRI International, so do what you think is best. Thanks for reading this. 71.242.43.9 (talk) 01:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eiko Shimamiya entries correct details

I am refering to your constant edits and reports on the "Eiko Shimamiya" Wikipedia entry. The new sequal OVA of "Higurashi no naku koro ni" is titled "Higurashi no naku koro ni Rei" NOT "Higurashi no naku koro ni Chikai" the official site states it is titled "Rei", it is mentioned nowhere that it is called "Chikai". Also the OVA has now been released and in the Opening credits, the title song, sung by "Eiko Shimamiya" is listed as "Super scription of data" NOT "Chikai". Please revise your details and check more official sources next time before changing back to "Chikai" again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yekim (talkcontribs) 06:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched for sources and found none, nor have you added any of the require reliable sources required by Wikipedia policy. Providing these sources will address my concerns. Alansohn (talk) 12:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You participated very productively in the AfD for this back in January of 2008; but it's still a puling mass of self-serving publicist's swill, a hagiography of a minor figure. Could you have a hack at the weasel-words and fluff? I've reached my overdose limit for treacle. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike asked me also--shall I let you continue first? my own feeling is for a much more drastic cut? DGG (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While I wouldn't go as far as Orangemike, I do agree that this needs a lot of work. DGG, if you're willing to hack away, I will accede to your approach and look over your shoulder to follow along. There is an encyclopedic article hidden inside what seems to be a tremendous amount of puffery. Leaving it unchanged is probably the wrong approach. Alansohn (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. DGG (talk) 19:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the attack

on my talkpage, much appriaciated SpitfireTally-ho! 20:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's my pleasure to watch your back. Alansohn (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandals on my user page. FYI: You should invest in archiving bot here.Shawnpoo (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure for the revert. I do have a bot set up, but I think something may be broken as I agree that this talk page is getting a bit out of hand. I do appreciate the investment tip, which would probably outperform virtually any other stock or bond one could buy today. Alansohn (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir/madam

...for cleaning up my page and squishing that "vandal". WadeSimMiser (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I think you misunderstood my edit as vandalism, I was checking out Special:LongPages, and this article drew my attention, as it was surprisingly on 2nd place with more than 400kb content. The I saw that article was vandalized, filled with the same paragraph "over 9000" times, so I cut it off. And, btw, robots are raging against humanity, copy-pasting same paragraph in the article. 81.95.228.239 (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A good one!

Bongomatic 07:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Purple Heart category

Put my grandfathers name on the Purple Heart list or I will be forced to turn you in for the child pornography that you own. ALANSOHN!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Douglashill530 (talkcontribs) 17:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wilbert Tatum

Number 399 (275 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wilbert Tatum, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 02:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]


Rainbow coloured dogs

If you don't mind too much could you have a look at University of Calgary ? I seem to have got into a revert war with UniversityDetectives over his Dog section. I thought I would drag a 3rd person in, you :) for another opinion. Thanks.  FrostedΔ14  03:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with your concerns and I expressed mine at the article's talk page. Alansohn (talk) 04:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry

But I just think that their wrong and I have every right to fix it SupermikeKSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain this edit, which calls WrestleMania XX the "nineteen" [sic] Wrestlemania, in seeming contradiction of the meaning of Roman numerals? Alansohn (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

School IP Address

I recently received a warning for an edit (I didn't do it, of course). I wanted to make sure you know that this IP address is a high school IP and so anyone from students to off-duty teachers could be doing the editing. Please be sure to keep up the good work stopping malicious edits from our students, I just wanted you to be aware of why they might come up often from here. Thanks for the help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.184.167.3 (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage, much appreciated, cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 21:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the SS Edmund Fitzgerald article. I unsuccessfully tried to semi-protect the article. Do you have the clearance to semi-protect this article from the frequent vandalism it is getting? Thank you in advance if you are able to help. --Wpwatchdog (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Hi Alansohn. I noticed you uncapitalized the "The"s from "The Associated Press" and "The New York Herald Tribune" in the article on William Jorden. Wikipedia's own manual of style is silent on this (I think), and this article (which uses a reasonable style guide itself—The New York Time's own) uses capital "The"s mid-sentence for both organizations. What is your reasoning? Bongomatic 00:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nonnie Moore

Number 400 (276 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nonnie Moore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you

Thanks for fixing my page, however they have decided to take it upon themself to be the editor of my talk page too *sigh* Mabuska (talk) 11:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martyn_Godfrey

Hi! I made a page about an author named Martyn_Godfrey. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyn_Godfrey. Could you please edit the page? Thanks!Neptunekh

DYK for Eric Blau

Number 401 (277 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eric Blau, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Printz

Number 402 (278 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Printz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

Hi Alansohn

I wasn't going to mention it, but you continue systematically not to cite me as the creator of articles you nominate for DKYs. While I may not expand the articles as much as you do, I spend time writing stubs, adding nicely formatted references, and frequently putting the germ of the sense of the person (when I don't actually write a full article, which I sometimes do). So, since there is a place for the creator, not just the expander, of an article in the DYK template, it would be appreciated if you would put my username there when you nominate an article I created, even if the creation has just slipped out of the five day window (I don't think the window applies to who is listed in the nomination, anyway).

Rgds, Bongomatic 00:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Thanks for correcting the info on the Total Drama Action article. User 71.179.87.46 also deleted an important Table that was in the article as well. --Halls452 (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure to make the fix. Alansohn (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- Not sure why you reverted me on this. Please discuss on the article's talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.77.165 (talkcontribs)

Revert was a clear mistake. See your talk page. Alansohn (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get your facts right

Automated tools shouldn't be used to warn people making good faith edits - I was reverting vandalism to the last good version - the article had been cleaned up to save it from AFD. --88.106.182.84 (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Del Piero

I don't believe that my edit was unconstructive, just that we ended up changing (you rolled back, I removed a sentence) the article at the same time Christopher Pritchard (talk) 22:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Pittsburgh Steelers

The changes that were made to the 1995 Pittsburgh Steelers page was done to match the standard look of the other seasons of the Pittsburgh Steelers.

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

information on admins and edits

thank you for the information but i have another question for you. are the admins contacted after an edit or is there a page for admins which shows the most recent edits and users that changed articles? sorry for the questions but i am just trying to understand the process better so i do not look like an idiot when i make my presentation and i want to be able to present the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.35.171 (talkcontribs)

County templates

Can you please watch the NJ county templates? That IP that was attacking the Mercer County template has now gone for Bergen County; and I'm on vacation, so I don't know if/how much I'll be able to keep them clean. Nyttend (talk) 13:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep a closer eye on these templates. Alansohn (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism an IP did to my user page. I didn't know that it had been done. Best, Vincent Valentine 21:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the least I can do for another editor. Unfortunately, it's like your house being robbed while your gone and then someone else replacing everything before you get home. The net is that your back where you started, but you still feel violated. Alansohn (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
True, but at least this time the vandal only added some irrelevant snippet from an article and wiped everything else. The last time it happened, it was a profanity-laden tirade along with the vandal announcing that he hoped I would die. I think I'll take the former! Thanks again, Vincent Valentine 22:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not Vandalism

This is not vandalism: "Mantises were created by God who made the world in 6 days and then rested on the 7th." It's short, simple, and imformative —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecalamity (talkcontribs) 02:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of John Dyneley Prince at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuddingJournalist 06:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Clare Potter

Hello! Your submission of Clare Potter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuddingJournalist 15:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alan Landers

Number 403 (279 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alan Landers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Rhena Schweitzer Miller

Number 404 (280 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rhena Schweitzer Miller, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 03:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for David C. Miller

Number 405 (281 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David C. Miller, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 03:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clare Potter

Hi -

Thanks for the nomination for Clare Potter! I didn't fancy nominating any more of my articles for a while as I felt I'd been lucky enough with the last two, and didn't want to be pushy/blow my trumpet too much. (I'm British, you see.) Anyway, I just wanted to mention that following your nom, you gave me the push I needed to get a sportswear (fashion) entry up, something that had been lacking for a long time. Cheers. Mabalu (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Congregation Mickve Israel

Number 406 (282 create/expand - 124 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Congregation Mickve Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hi

What part of "Urinal Waster Dumping Center" is unconstructive. Tell me, is it not true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.96.254.176 (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply at user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First of all typ: Waste*. Second, see: [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.96.254.176 (talk) 09:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just do it

I think you can do this ... sounds ok to me Victuallers (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Blume

Under the career section of the Judy Blume page, the controversial issues listed for Deenie/Then Again Maybe I Won't and Forever were listed as "ion" and, well, nothing respectively. Unless there were issues concerning the portrayal of ions in two of Blume's works, fixing that seems plenty constructive. Thanks for adding links to menstruation and teenage sex, but check before you refer to something as unconstructive. 11:40 12 March 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.140.102 (talkcontribs)

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble tea!

65.117.141.218 continues

IMHO, "assume good faith" is over. --Plenz (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It truly disturbs me that editors like User:65.117.141.218 are given so much good faith, all of which is returned as more idiotic vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islam Karimov: unexplained IP edits

Please take a look at Islam Karimov. A bit of an edit war is going on around "Islam" vs "Islom". I am not taking sides here, but I object to the unexplained changes that IP user 213.80.170.74 insists on making in an almost trolling pattern. Please decide if there is room for intervention. Thank you. --Zlerman (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odd vandalism/reversion/vandalism/ editing pattern?

There have been a few odd revisions to Christian Dior today all from one user - I've reversed them all, but looking in the edit history, they were bizarre. The page was vandalised, reverted, then vandalised again and left for someone to deal with. Anyway it seemed like it should be drawn to someone more in charge's attention and I didn't want to assume a role that probably wasn't mine, I'd likely have done the wrong thing anyway. But maybe a friendly heads-up about correct editing from a mod/mod-type on the disruptive editor's Me Page would be in order? Sorry if I've done this incorrectly, wasn't sure who to ask or how to ask. Thanks. Mabalu (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clare Potter

Number 407 (282 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 13 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clare Potter, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 23:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the vandal reverts on my userpage. Cheers! Taroaldo (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Barbara Parker (writer)

Number 408 (283 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Barbara Parker (writer), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minhag America

Number 409 (284 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minhag America, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Union Prayer Book

Number 410 (285 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Union Prayer Book, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 07:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gates of Prayer

Number 411 (286 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gates of Prayer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mishkan T'filah

Number 412 (287 create/expand - 125 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mishkan T'filah, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy the bubble tea!

Thanks! Re: Judy Blume

Thanks for the apology about the Judy Blume correction, I really appreciate that you took the time to do so. On that note, I realize that I probably sounded a little overly annoyed and short in my message. Writing a paper at the end of midterm week will do that to you. But for that, I'd like to apologize myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.140.102 (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thaddeus Dod

Number 413 (287 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 16 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thaddeus Dod, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ernest Trova

Number 414 (288 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ernest Trova, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for George Keverian

Number 415 (289 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Keverian, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Alansohn protection for the SDA cult

COngradulations "Alansohn," I'm sure the Seventh Day Arrogance church appreciates your protection from anyone knowing what their cult actually preaches....that they are the only ones who are right, that anyone outside of their church (or at least that does anything on Saturday's) has lost their salvation, that by working on Saturdays you are more likely to get sick etc. All the while having members that build 7,000 sq/ft houses for single people and lie to the courts and then turn around and claim “The Bible, and the Bible alone.” But wait, even the Bible can't get it's own stories straight, so why should we expect anything different from a cult that has it's own self-proclaimed profit!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.10.78 (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mark H. Beers

Number 416 (290 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mark H. Beers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Mark Beers

Hi Alansohn

As you can see from the history of the Mark Beers page and the history of the Mark H. Beers page, you elected to create a new article rather than expand a stub (a stub which, in fact, had a talk page with additional resources and a number of key biographical details to be added to the articles) that was clearly in existence. Even if you believe (in this case, I don't see any support for the idea) that per Wikipedia naming convention, "Mark H. Beers" is the appropriate name, a page move and/or redirect is a better way to address such a view than to duplicate an entry.

Regards, Bongomatic 00:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I so rarely create articles with middle initials, but the medical references I had found used it so I createdMark H. Beers never realizing that you had created Mark Beers an hour earlier. Given that you had done all the research on Beers, why didn't you create the full-fledged DYK-eligible article instead of a bare stub?Alansohn (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the article was created seven hours earlier, not one. As is frequently the case, I didn't have the time or inclination to create a full article, but was sufficiently interested by the subject to leave (at the same time) a detailed list of key items and several references. Bongomatic 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC) p.s. No need—this time or any other time—to reply on my talk page or leave a {{talkback}}. I watch talk pages when I leave a comment.[reply]

DYK for Tom Cole (writer)

Number 417 (291 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tom Cole (writer), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for About Time (play)

Number 418 (292 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article About Time (play), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Sorry I didn't realize that connecting a common intrest was considered vandalism. Also I didn't see your warnings before I made more edits. Thats the ONLY reason I kept doing it Kingrattus (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I should have also listed Crib & Bib (I did on some but forgot on others).. So it should be infant, crib, bib, baby monitor & SIDS. 2 are very important when it comes to SIDS, and well SIDS is important all on its own as so many people aren't even aware of it.. baby sling is an accessory (also a safty thing) & so are bibs. Everything goes with Baby Showers, as the people who are buying something for a gift should be informed on the best/safest product. As a bad buy can cause harm or possibly SIDS (baby crib mattress for example)...

I'm not trying to cause harm. Just trying to make it easier to find things (more so the important one that are related)... When I was finished with Babies (saftey for the most part), I was going to start on Security Cameras as they need updating & then onto pets.

I have a list of all the pages I did change so I could go back & tweek them as needed. If you want me to undo what I did, I will, or tweek them so its a better fit (maybe I should just use infant, baby shower, & SIDS), I can do that too.

I honestly mean no harm

Kingrattus (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


ok, Do you want me to go back & change what I edited? So its only infant? I am sorry for being a pain :(

Kingrattus (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes Table

This is what I'm talking about, no one can get "confused" because it's listed with the episodes. Btw, I heard back from Discovery, they don't have a date for Season 4 finale. 70.24.233.37 (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes

Series Overview

Season Episodes Season Premiere Season Finale
1 8 April 10, 2007 May 14, 2007
2 12 October 15, 2007 December 17, 2007
3 31 January 7, 2008 June 16, 2008
4 June 23, 2008

Ray Hunt

Hi. You mentioned somewhere that you monitor the NYTimes obituaries. Would you keep a look out for Ray Hunt? I'm trying to expand a stub in time for the memorial services later this month. Thanks! --Una Smith (talk) 04:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep an eye out on any additional sources. Alansohn (talk) 01:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naturopathy/ThujaSol

Can you clarify why my edit is considered vandalism and why a level 4 warning? - --ThujaSol∆๏̯͡๏ 22:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

???

Do you work for wikipedia? Because it is so sad that you care so much about it. Do you live in your parents basememnt and sit behind a screen all day making sure no one is "vandalizing". Get a job. While your at it get a life as well. Its the sad truth. Stop hiding from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.149.247 (talkcontribs)

Episodes Table

I've been editing/adding episodes for Jon & Kate Plus 8 for over a year now and I am not doing any vandalism. The episode table is already listed, why list it twice, epsecially now? The old expression "if it ain't broke, why fix it"?

Take a look here: Follow this link and you'll see the table of episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes 70.24.233.37 (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Michael Shannon (pediatrician)

Number 419 (293 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michael Shannon (pediatrician), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone interesting. Regards. Bongomatic 02:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick. How about George Hedges? Another interesting person. Bongomatic 03:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst you might disagree with his edits, there are absolutely no way his edits are vandalism, although I concur that they weren't correct. Please don't bite the newbies - he has been actively editing for less than a month, and there is no way that his edits are in bad faith. — neuro(talk)(review) 17:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 17:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Really, just because you don't like an edit, you're going to call it vandalism? Because I very much doubt you can prove, from an objective point of view, that the change I made had made that page any worse. Sure, maybe to your point of view, but I don't think it had that much more merit before my edit, than after.

In that case, wouldn't you just call it another pointless edit, to an already pointless page?

Unless you can find some specific guideline that spells out exactly why my change was vandalism, I think you really should stop that kind of thing. It's annoying as hell to have small changes labeled like that. 24.23.32.249 (talk) 22:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am amazed by the ability to rationalize away vandalism, but your edit wasn't even a close call. Alansohn (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, maybe to your point of view, but are you really so sure that all other points of view would agree? I do not think so. I think my edit had merit, even if you don't see it. 98.238.188.211 (talk) 00:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I'm sure you hear it a lot, but thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I appreciate it. TravisAF (talk) 05:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shelby, NC

I'm somewhat baffled that my reference to Kenny Powers, a fictional character from HBO's "Eastbound and Down", was removed from the Shelby, NC homepage. In the program, Powers is, indeed, supposed to be a product and resident of Shelby. What would make such a reference appropriate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.40.48 (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert E. A. Lee

Number 420 (294 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert E. A. Lee, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 05:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I hate to say it, but there you go again. Bongomatic 09:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People of note

Bongomatic 10:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Steve Bernard

Number 421 (295 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Steve Bernard, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

And again. Bongomatic 15:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check w:index.php?title=Arundhati_Roy&action=history and revert to include latest info about Roy's list. Each objection is carefully addressed, then the edit gets reverted anyway by two editors working in tandem. Thanks, 74.162.153.220 (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to restore this edit. Please see this about "Roy's List" then this about the edit. Thanks, 65.246.126.130 (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Charles S. Lieber

Number 422 (296 create/expand - 126 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles S. Lieber, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three in a day. Bongomatic 00:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Hello. Please be careful when making edits to WP:AIV, as it appears that you accidentally removed one of my administrator's comment [3]. Thanks — Kralizec! (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 03:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Dyneley Prince

Number 423 (296 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Updated DYK query On 22 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Dyneley Prince, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Doris Abrahams

Number 424 (297 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doris Abrahams, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kermit Bloomgarden

Number 425 (298 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kermit Bloomgarden, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nixon's Last Press Conference

Number 426 (299 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nixon's Last Press Conference, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 12:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Ralph Mercado

Number 427 (300 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ralph Mercado, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Two different hooks in the same group - no wonder you're the most prolific DYK contributor! Royalbroil 12:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Lawrence Herkimer

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lawrence Herkimer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble tea!

Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism on {{bubble tea}}! For that, I give you...

Vandalism?

Quite frankly sir, it is not my fault that you have such a low grasp on Norse mythology. I myself am from Oslo, Norway, and I'm sure I know more about my homeland than you do. The fact that you reverted my edit shows your incompetence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.186.168.203 (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a mere resident of New Jersey, having reviewed the edit in question, my lack of in-depth knowledge of Norse mythology was no impediment to identifying your edit as vandalism, in all its epicness. Alansohn (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Epicness—NICE! Think we need a (non dict def) entry for it. Some references
Bongomatic 03:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable alumni" of minor league teams

Hi. Another editor, NatureBoyMD, has come up with what I think is a good and thoughtful template and conditions for a "notable alumni" list for a minor league team that interests him. See [4]. I thought that before he finalizes it, it/he might benefit from you taking a glance at it, and giving him any comments that you may have, since I could see it being used for other minor league teams (its better than anything I've seen), and you are a baseball editor whose views I respect. Feel free to leave your comments on it for him on my home talk page at the above url, as that is where he and I have been discussing it. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

INSULTING

STOP INSULTING THE WIKIPEDIA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.252.234.42 (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting fellows

Bongomatic 05:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK help?

Hello! By any chance can you help with making this a DYK? I am not sure how to add these things, but I think this referenced fact would be a good one to include. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 17:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This would have been a great candidate for a hook, but the article doesn't meet the qualifications for DYK. Per WP:DYK, an article must be new or have been expanded fivefold within the past five days. As this article is a rather old one, and has not met the expansion requirement, it would not be eligible. I'll be happy to take a look at any new / newly-expanded articles. Alansohn (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, what about with this? As you can see I expanded the article considerably? Could we ask, "Did you know that Will Kane's was Gary Cooper's second Academy Award winning role?" or "Did you know that Will Kane is ranked fourteenth on Entertainment Weeklys list of Top 20 Heroes of all time?" Best, --A NobodyMy talk 19:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You needn't worry

You needn't worry that I'm seriously plotting to assassinate troublesome categories. For one, I'm not a bureaucrat, nor would I want to be one, so I can't satisfy my own stated pre-requisites for perpetration. Secondly, it would of course be an affront to the principle of "consensus", which (at least until further notice) is foundational. Thirdly, it would surely result in the perpetrators getting banned; nobody wants to be banned. Fourthly, I couldn't handle the media attention. Fifthly, what would my auntie Kay think? Lastly, there are not enough knives in all the world to properly finish the job on the category tree. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worried. I'm very worried. I've already seen the damage that can and will be done to those who dare to disagree, even without all the knives sharpened. Trivializing the Holocaust and child molestation, and now turning the Night of the Long Knives into a sick joke, is a rather disturbing precedent for any administrator, even one whose not a bureaucrat. Alansohn (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relax, Alansohn. It was a passing joke—whether or not it's "sick" or not, I'm unsure—I'll have to get a fecal sample from it to know for sure. :) Just to clarify, I don't have a problem with users disagreeing with me on issues as opinion-dependent as the existence of a particular category. You can choose be "very worried" about all of this if you want—don't misunderstand me as being bossy or ordering you not to—but my suggestion would be that life is too short and for most people there are probably more important and relevant things to spend your "worry time" on. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly of concern to you

I was looking at a user's contributions and quite by accident I saw that the user had edited User talk:Alansohn2. Is User:Alansohn2 anything to do with you? If not, we might want to take further steps, as there's a possible risk of impersonation due to the similarity of your names. (The new account edited a page on NJ and also posted a warning on a user talk page, which is why I thought it might be you experimenting with another account, but if not this increases the potential confusion problems of a user using this name.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Lee is about 5 miles away, but it's not me. There is a genuine possibility that its could be someone else with the same name, which would be quite a coincidence but far from impossible. I'd keep an eye on the account. It doesn't appear to be someone trying to spoof my edits, but the person could be close enough that some of our edits might overlap. Alansohn (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if you run into any trouble from it and I'll help if I can. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are so sneaky, Alansohn, selecting such an unguessable name for your sock. Good sleuthing, Good Olfactory! Keep up the vigilance! Bongomatic 02:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I never thought anyone would make the connection to my "other" ID. I am so glad that I've been saving my Dunkin' Donuts receipts since my last sockpuppet problem cropped up. Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, wha? I never thought of this as a "sock" problem at all. Had this been the "real" Alansohn's other account I would have assumed, based on the accounts edits, that he was simply experimenting with using another account. My concern was actually that another user was trying to impersonate our fine editor here. If you're just mocking me for the sake of doing so, Bongo, I'm now going to laugh along .... (ha ha ha cough cough gurgle...) Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Bongo was joking here, as was I. No gurgling necessary. Alansohn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought probably that was the case—I tried to laugh along and then it got stuck in my throat ... I can dish it out but I can't take it ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DRV

I have opened a DRV on the wrangler categories, on which you opined. Occuli (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For expansion

DYK for James Beach

Updated DYK query On March 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article James Beach, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Thank You

...For removing the vandalism on my talk page Dougofborg (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Martin Knowlton

Updated DYK query On March 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Martin Knowlton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DRV of the Wrangler categories

I'm unhappy with your comment about my "concocting an excuse" to close the Second Wrangler category as "delete" because I put my personal views above process. You may have missed my comment that I closed the 2008 discussion as "keep", so I don't know why you think my views accord with the outcome. Please retract your remarks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 11:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning to reply? Or do I have to raise the matter elsewhere, given your prima facie assumption of bad faith on my part? BencherliteTalk 18:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just so we're entirely clear, this is the diff I'm talking about. BencherliteTalk 18:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't seen your earlier note. I will review and make a determination as to what modification would be appropriate to more accurately reflect your actions in closing this CfD under discussion. Alansohn (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When? You've been doing plenty of editing since I left the second message, let alone the first message, and I'm disappointed that you haven't given this a higher priority. BencherliteTalk 09:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I had been trying to word my response and hadn't had a chance to stop by DRV. I have replied and made it clear that I do not believe that you "concocted" anything, rather that there was a misapplication and misinterpretation of Wikipedia policy in closing the CfD in question. I hope this addresses your concerns. Please feel free to respond further either on my talk page or at DRV. Alansohn (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for removing any suggestion of bad faith. The reasonableness of my closure is clearly something upon which people can, and do, differ, and so I don't have any remaining issues with your comments. Regards, BencherliteTalk 14:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SimplySim

|Bibikha is not a vandal, he is a sockpuppet for user talk:HugovivScientus (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism

There has been repeat vandalism from a shared user account that you have previously notified User talk:194.221.133.211. I guess that Aviva employees have nothing better to do than vandalise Wikipedia... Could you arrange a block? DiverScout (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert on my userpage

Thank you, also great work in the recent changes, keep it up! All the best SpitfireTally-ho! 20:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalizing this page. Do your reasearch and pay attention to the links, the proof was there all along. You can make Wikipedia more enjoyable by reading what is presented to you first before making assumptions on what is correct and not correct - got it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.108.255.76 (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discrepancy between the title of Mansfield, Florida and the name in the article is what made this appear to be vandalism. I am investigating and will try to help resolve this issue. Alansohn (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes I'm looking at it too. Ghost towns can be tricky, it seems. :) See the ref list I've added to the talk page. Proofreader77 (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Follow-up - After carefully investigating (and checking "Mansfield, Florida" as well), I'm satisfied that Mannfield is the correct name in this case. I have moved it. Like Obama, I take responsibility for this. :) Cheers. Proofreader77 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Follow-up NOTE: I did not remove the warning on 12.108.255.76 talk (did not want to act on your behalf without your approval). Proofreader77 (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Since you are apparently offline, I have removed the warning in question (since the information I've added to the talk page has substantially changed the equation of available information for decision). If further evaluation suggests the warning should be restored, please excuse this ephemeral action. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC) (Edited: Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]
SOME ONE NEEDS TO REMOVE IT AND STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE FACTS ARE ALREADY IN FRONT OF YOU.--12.108.255.76 (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It appears Alansohn is off duty at this time. (I will respond further on your talk page) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: "good and evil"

"Hear hear!" for your words (on your user page) re "common sense."

P.S. re "poop" -- Here's to ever-smarter bots, so we don't have to scoop. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better bots would be one option, but leash laws might be even better. Alansohn (talk) 02:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Majidmushtaq

Hi Alansohn, I wonder if you'd be willing to look again at the warning you gave this newbie. It looks to me like Majid was blanking stuff he'd written after it had been challenged. ϢereSpielChequers 18:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As requested, and after further review of the circumstances, I removed the warning. Alansohn (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou very much. ϢereSpielChequers 19:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, my sorriness is weighty

I want to apologize dearly to you, my friend, for my work on Sallust. I have ADD and cannot pay attention. So I sit with a book and read until I can't and then make Sallust different. I understand this is wrong and that I have no business doing it. Much love for the new Year. 128.197.244.131 (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting person

  • Not sure I agree—the bankruptcy and crimes are personal, the gallery was 100% owned and run by him. As the articles point out, the art business is a trust one, person-to-person, not person-to-company. Bongomatic 02:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey there, thanks for getting rid of the vandalism on my userpage. I really appreciate it. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dorothea Holt Redmond

Updated DYK query On March 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dorothea Holt Redmond, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for George Hedges

Updated DYK query On March 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Hedges, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 07:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

A couple more

Enjoy, Bongomatic 08:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the above article to the following location: User:Alansohn/Little tikes. ... discospinster talk 13:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just as I have explained on Discospinster's page, the page was deleted multiple times as blatant copy-and-paste copyright infringement of [5]; I tagged for G11 the first time because I couldn't find the copyvio. MuZemike 16:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored it to User:Alansohn/Little Tikes for you. ... discospinster talk 19:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page

... was probably intended for User talk:Peteryesness, author of a deleted-by-me article about a non-notable backup singer. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely correct. This is not the first time that Huggle has had me send a message to the wrong page, and I will be even more careful the next time (and will still screw it up). Thanks for relocating the message to its correct destination. Alansohn (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverts

On Hellions of Troy. Amy "Bitches Bruze" Moore (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]