User talk:Antiqueight

E L O C K I D

Home

Talk Page

Contributions

Subpages

Email

A n t i q u e i g h t' s

Template:Archive box collapsible Welcome

I like Hitler and support all of his veiws.

If I leave a note on your page I am watching there. If you comment here I will reply here.

I am still learning my way around the place. I will make mistakes. Please contact me if I do and we can talk.

Editing style

so yea im here and i will help edits

When it comes to new pages I tend to be a deletionist - I try to focus on obvious junk, copyvio or advertising but in certain areas I'll tag for notability as well. However for starter articles which don't fall under these headings I will, from now on, move them to the user space. If you think I should be using other methods let me know too.

Occasionally I will however decide to work on a page which has little content, is badly laid out or no references etc. to see if I can help it. If I have tagged a page for something I am more than willing to see if I can help with the page too though often I haven't because I don't know enough about the topic to be useful.

Notes for myself

freely licenced

image copyright information page

here

Put your image on your desktop or some other convenient place, then choose "Click here to start the upload form." On the next page, fill in all the blanks, upload your file, and then choose "This is a free work." Finally, choose on the succeeding page "This file is entirely my own work," and tell how and why you took the photo. Leave the Creative Commons attribution the way it is. Fill in your real name or your WP name if you want attribution. Don't bother to upload to Commons because it involves an extra step and is not as user-friendly. At the end of all this you will be greeted by a page that actually gives you a model line for you to copy and insert into any WP article, on the edit page. Very simple. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SuggestBot

1000 edits at 20:01, 9 October 2013

2000 edits at 20:08, 19 October 2013

3000 edits at 17:40ish, 23 October 2013

4000 edits around midnight 29/30 October 2013

5000 edits around 23:00 04 November 2013 (Number of edits:5,555 @09:28, 6 November 2013)

ping all admins at once on help.. #wikipedia-en , using bangadmin (!admin)

Comments

October

Your submission at AfC Eugene Sheehy (priest) was accepted

Eugene Sheehy (priest), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for catching that spelling error at Cross Point Lowell. A minor thing but important, and appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Well, sure. The page is on my watchlist -- I wrote it and am so far practically the only major editor, so it's one of my "babies" and I like to see my babies being taken care of. You won't get a lot of messages for fixing spelling errors, but it's actually kind of important in that spelling errors make the articles look kind of shoddy and I think detracts from their perceived value. So you can be assured that most every spelling fix is seen by multiple people (the people watching the article) and appreciated, even though you won't usually get an actual note. Carry on! Herostratus (talk) 17:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Saint Midabaria

This article has already been (correctly) restored. I deleted it as a CSD G5 article, but your expansion has made it vastly bigger, so it no longer qualifies for speedy deletion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Overlinking

Have a read of WP:OVERLINK. One link to a country is more than sufficient - and my personal preference is to have that in the prose as opposed to the infobox. Total removal is also sometimes fine, as the MOS says "In particular, unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, the following are not usually linked [...] the names of major geographic features and locations" which obviously includes countries. GiantSnowman 11:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

It varies from user to user how they implement it - but as long as they do implement it, that is the main thing. GiantSnowman 12:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Antiqueight. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 22:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Boodles Boxing Ball

Hello. I've tried to salvage the page. I feel like there may be too many pictures though--we could just keep the three that are at the top, and move the others to a link for Wikimedia Commons, but I'm not sure how to do that. Also they've added unreferenced info, which always infuriates me.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

The photos are already at Wikimedia Commons. They were loaded there by BoodlesUK. It does make the page look rather like a tabloid or society page with all the photos..And you can either look for a citation for the unreferenced info or remove it as unreferenced...You might be able to find something through google to back it up? Looks much better though :-)--Antiqueight ^confer 19:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I think it looks much better now. I've moved the unreferenced section to the talkpage as well, should anyone be able to reference it.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You're right, that does look good now.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. If you want to write more, do it on my talkpage please, as I am unfollowing your page to avoid following too many. Thanks.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Please ban Rape is not a crime.

Pleas eban Rape is not a crime user. They are actually this cartoonist who is harassing the article subject off-wiki. --Playabeacha (talk) 00:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

I am not an admin but you can raise this with one. (Go https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard) Antiqueight ^confer 00:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Ignore this moron. I read about HiyoHiyo in a newspaper which said he really was Kei Nakashima and a convicted pedophile. --Rape is definitely a crime (talk) 00:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

You can't put that on a BLP without citations. Find the article. Antiqueight ^confer 00:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

• Just to let you know, these two accounts are socks of each other. I've blocked both. Risker (talk) 01:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Wow- really? Thanks for the update. I wouldn't have guessed they were socks but I did think there would be a war..--Antiqueight ^confer 01:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) I guess the left sock didn't know what the right sock was doing. *joke* davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Grin!-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 03:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Just one, I'm afraid. Oh, well . . . GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my edit to the Neptune Islands article

Hi, can you please explain why you undid mu edit to the article about the Neptune Islands? Cowdy001 (talk) 02:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Yep - just responded on your talk page.--Antiqueight ^confer 02:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Ywkhcw

You undone one of my comments on Stan Collymoore. This was infact true as he was charged with both dogging, and domestic violence so could you please 're-add it'. Thanks. (from Ywkhcw )

Coffee Berry Usage

Thank you for your quick review and response to our suggestions for the Coffee page. As a hopefully helpful point of information, the fruit of the coffee plant is technically a cherry or drupe, not a berry. “CoffeeBerry®” is a trademarked term suggestive of a line of products derived from whole coffee cherries. FutureCeuticals is the exclusive owner of the common law trademark rights and federal trademark registrations for the coined trademark COFFEEBERRY® for these goods. (U.S. Trademark Reg. Nos. 3,165,945; 3,163,412; 3,155,230; 3,555,231; 3,555,232; 3,420,510; 3,160,267; 3,646,701; and 3,643,304.)

In order to avoid confusion regarding use of the term CoffeeBerry® and characterization of the fruit, we politely request that you reconsider our suggestions and reinstate our changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew H. Wheeler (talk • contribs) 21:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey there - when you leave a note on someone's page please do sign it by putting the ~~~~ after it. It makes it easier to know who has written. The Rhamnus californica is also commonly known as the coffeeberry. I don't think people are going to mistake a cosmetic trademark for the fruit of the coffee plant. But while cherry is correct berry is the more common name for the fruit at least that I'm aware of (accuracy doesn't change the name of the strawberry either). Suggest the change on the talk page and perhaps you will get a consensus to change the term.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for you reply. You may notice that I did not change berry in reference to the particular plant you are adressing, nor did I cange it in the section regarding the mis-identification as a berry in the Kosher discussion. Once again, please kindly make the necessary changes. Any reference to coffee berries in the coffee shpere is, in fact, infringement upon our trademarks and we do monitor its usage worlwide. 168.93.82.35 (talk) 21:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

As I said - open it for discussion on the talk page of the article. -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Antiqueight, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Pratyya (Hello!) 05:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Steve Mann

I recall this is the second time that someone has added "self-promotion" charge to Steve Mann. It ain't true -- major refereed scholar with lots of citations. (I am not Steve, but know him.) Whoever did it the first time, was told the charge wasn't true, and any citation index would bear that out.

Therefore, the next time (the same?) IP user inserts self-promotion, pls dont Assume Good Faith. Yours in Wikiwonderland, Bellagio99 (talk) 20:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Got your message and understand. But don't let tools tell us what to do. If editor persists, I'll edit the article. Steve does attract polarized opinions. Bellagio99 (talk) 20:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Of hotels and dormice

I hope he's got the message this time. I'm trying to keep the English simple and not bite. I've extended to a show of teeth now... As to the dormouse, I've left a message on Cumhitherponya's talk page explaining that it's up to him/her to prove it is, not for you to prove it isn't. You might be amused... Peridon (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I didn't go for the delete until he removed the tags a second time. Thanks for the note about the dormouse. Caused a laugh. I'm feeling a bit guilty this evening - trying out Huggle I'm playing with the newly created pages and surprised how many need to be clobbered. But of course the tool probably only points out the ones of a dubious nature. I feel very destructive this evening (though for tagging I end up going back to Twinkle - it works better). Since the first few deletes I ever did were pointed out to be wrong I usually don't go for that option...except tonight!-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 20:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I don't like programs deciding things for me. The idea of self-controlled cars worries me. Having a fool at the wheel is one thing - a fool can realise that the shit's about to hit the fan, and do something about it. A machine KNOWS it's right and won't do anything - and anyway, it's only as good as the programmer made it to be. (A pet bee in the bonnet for me is programmers who know code inside out but have never even worked in McDonalds let alone in business...) My first 12,000 edits were all without programmed assistance. Then I got a mop, and Twinkle. You're not being destructive - there's rubbish to be removed. I've removed 30,000 pages of it. When you think that there at least 200 admins who regularly if not frequently visit CSD, there must be a hell of a lot more over the last two and a half yours that I've been at it. Some of it is by author request, or is left over from moves, and so on. The majority was rubbish. Have a look at Edits by New Accounts. (Contribs page - at the top select the top button.) You can find stuff that Page Curation and Huggle miss out. I think that's where Mean as Custard and co find the offending user pages. No IP stuff, though. Peridon (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Deciding things for me no - but reducing the number of mouse clicks I need to fulfil and action, that I like. But none of these tools are perfect and I am testing them all out to see what I like or don't like about each. Huggle seems to be making me a little 'delete' happy - but that could just be my mood tonight. I am still working out how to get AWB to edit the spelling errors the way I want. I will go back to that tomorrow. If I had the coding skill I'm create my own little tool for doing just what I want and nothing more..I shall take a look at the Edits by New Accounts tomorrow too. My main areas of concern in reviewing new articles are that I don't know when a record/song or company are notable or not. When it is advertising/promotion and when is it an encyclopaedic entry of note. So until tonight I have stuck closely to spellings and vandals. Those are easy to spot!-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 22:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

If it's pure spam, it doesn't belong here, notable or not. Read WP:PEACOCK. Anything in the first person is likely to be spam, as is anything offering solutions, striving for excellence, or giving phone numbers or twittering contacts. With record companies, if there are three artistes, all redlinked, they're non-notable. But don't trust blue links - a band called Hastings would be called Hastings (band) on an article title, so check where the link goes. With A9, there may be nothing linked at all, or there might be a red link. Google the band name with 'wiki'. Then correct the link in the article if necessary - or tag it - whichever applies. A9 is an AND criterion. A record can be notable without the artiste being, or vice versa. A9 requires both to be non. Look at the speedy deletion category, read some of the entries, and keep a copy of it open. Then check back on it later to see what happened. If not sure, leave alone and watch it. On your watchlist. With performers, if they start with the schools attended, and how they did their first rap at six, and they are working on their first mixtape - non-notable is a pretty good guess. I've never seen or heard a mixtape, but if you haven't got one yet, you're nobody. Having one doesn't mean you are notable, though. It's being signed to an outfit that's of note itself, having charting records, and having RS. Peridon (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Zuccotti park, musical

Speedy Deletion or Nominate for deletion? What do you prefer? ///EuroCarGT 23:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't 100% sure speedy applied or I would certainly have gone with that - while I was deciding you got in there - so go with speedy. I think I rolled the rest back once I saw what had happened. Thanks-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Had the same issue, I seen the page, then confusingly decided on either CSD or AfD but when I saw some of the text it was promotional so went with G12. ///EuroCarGT 23:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Well - you have more experience than I do so we'll go with your first choice- and besides if it gets rejected for CSD there is always AfD to go :-)-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:24, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Zuccotti park, musical. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 23:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Article pulled from request for deletion and so all related documentation rolled back.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I closed the AFD as Withdrawn by Nominator. In the future, you don't need to place a CSD template on the AFD. You can simply state that you are withdrawing the nomination somewhere in the discussion. Someone will then come along an close the AFD along with removing and adding other templates as necessary. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 00:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - I'd forgotten that it would potentially cause confusion and was just undoing what I'd created..I will remember in future - Just as an FYI - there is now a lost and orphaned talk page as the speedy went through for that page... 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 00:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate speedy deletion request

I see that you tagged LRGB for speedy deletion as an article with no content. A quick look at the editing history would have shown that it had no content only because a vandal had blanked the page about 20 minutes before. Before tagging any page for deletion, you should check the history of the page, to see whether the issue (whatever it is) can be dealt with by reverting to an earlier version. The king of the sun (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Indeed - I didn't check back far enough - Good point - It was User:Abdulrhman Albastaki who blanked it - as he had been creating another page with what appeared to be the same content and then moved his content to his own page I must have assumed he was the page creator and had blanked it himself.

-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 15:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Easily done - I have to remind myself to look back in the history. (Interesting what you find, doing that...) Peridon (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Actually it is (interesting)! I usually look back further, though. And I then I watch the pages of 'problem' editors and check their contributions from time to time after I revert something to see if they cease or need to be reported. I think I was careless here though.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1967 Guards 100 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Pole_Time = 1:28.8<ref
• The '''Guards 100''' was an [[1967 European Formula Two season|[European Formula Two]] held on 23 March 1967 at the [[Snetterton Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Already fixed! -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 19:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate speedy deletion

I see that you tagged Alfie Byrne Harriers for speedy deletion on the basis that they are not a real club. I can assure you they are and I don't know how you could state they aren't. You mustn't have a good knowledge of the area as they are very well known in the Clontarf area and frequently play against the likes of Raheny United who have their own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aroncon95 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Because nothing in Clontarf, St Anne's Park or football in Dublin in general mentions the club anywhere so I have trouble believing it can be that well known. You have no references for the club at all and I can't find any references online. Alfie Byrne is well enough known that I would imagine any club named after him would get some local coverage but I can't find it. Please - prove me wrong. I am more than willing to be told where to look to see the club.

Raheny United have their own page, RTE coverage and are a women's team. Nothing you said so far has suggested that the Hrriers had women members We play against them all the time, it's great fun. The harriers love birds! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aroncon95 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC) -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 22:16, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Whispers From The Machine

That would have been a good speedy deletion candidate. The creator is the author of that poem and he's not notable either. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't sure what to speedy it under - there didn't seem to be a place for an unnotable written word...-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 12:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I would WP:IAR and try A7. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Go for it - last time I tried a speedy for something which was clearly unnotable but wasn't one of the options it was denied and an AfD was created - it was eventually deleted :-) -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 12:45, 23 October 2013 (UTC) What the hek - done!-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 12:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I should have said "I would have" instead of "I would", but what the heck. Let's see how a speedy tag on top of an active AfD works out. :) A bold admin may just wipe the whole thing out. I would support that. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Prism Revert

I just wanted to say that your revert was a mistake- I was adding a reviewer's commentary and fixing name inconsistencies XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Snickersgate

You could pretty well take your pick, I don't think any admin is going to decline this. Test/Non-notable/vandalism/OR... I wouldn't tag as hoax myself, it's not even pretending to be a proper article (:

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Need Help

Hi

I am trying to create this page "Brainiers Technical Services" on wikipedia. Brainiers is my company that i have founded with my brother in 2012. Within last two years we have grown into a team of 1200 people. Now I am trying to tell the world about my company. I have been doing SEO for my websites for quite sometime now. But I beleive Wikipedia is not a platform just for seo. I am actually using this platform to make a mark on internet for my company. I just want people to know about my work that I have been doing.

For this i require your help.

I do not properly understand this platform but i want to make a page for my company here. If I am doing anything wrong please tell me.

Thanks 14:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Nikhil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techbrainiers (talk • contribs)

Congratulations on the company - But you have two problems - One is that you, as an interested party should not be creating this page as you have a conflict of interest. If the company is notable someone else will create the page. Two is that Wikipedia is not a way to make a mark for your company. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not an advertising website. I left you some links on your page but you should read these below as well. Your company may well be notable but it needs to show it on the page. However you would be better not writing the page yourself, possibly go to Wikipedia:Article wizard and request the article be written. You could put the content you want in a draft page of your user pages (just type /draft after your user page and it will let you create a new user page.)

WP:PROMOTION

Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

I will definitely take the necessary steps Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techbrainiers (talk • contribs) 14:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Bill Cotton. Comment

Removal is fine by me. I just think it's interesting the guy probably knew Savile as well as being his boss and he never heard/did anything about the alleged molestation. The whole Savile thing completely fascinates me: was he the worst criminal in UK history; or, is it a national case of folie a deux??? Just saying.User:JCHeverly 01:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Not a clue and no one who should know is saying. In the 80s it was Satan worship and child sacrifice. Now it's child abuse. I honestly don't know what is happening any more. Is it all real? Considering Polanski, both his behaviour and the apologists for it, anything is possible.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 01:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

CSC 104 article 1: Jilong Zhang listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CSC 104 article 1: Jilong Zhang. Since you had some involvement with the CSC 104 article 1: Jilong Zhang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 02:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article?

You deleted my article on CJ Fly's mixtape "Thee Way Eye See It". I had valid evidence as to why it was relevant. The rapper is member of Pro Era. A group that is which run by popular rapper Joey Badass. Well known producers worked on his mixtape and not to mention that I didn't even finish editing my article. So you had to be a dick and delete it quickly without reading it. A lot of websites have reviewed this mixtape and Fuse interviewed him about it as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PyschopathicMan (talk • contribs) 00:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I didn't delete it. I am not an admin. It is still there - you can still edit it - but best to put your reasons it should not be deleted up - click on the button on the tag on the page "Note to page author: you have not edited the article talk page yet. If you wish to contest this speedy deletion, clicking the button above will allow you to leave a talk page message explaining why you think this page should not be deleted." A mixtape is not generally notable but if you can explain why it is, go for it. I have no problem being wrong.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 00:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Themes

Please let me know if you do. Dougweller (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Sure :-) I can do that.. I'm thinking of something Christmasy - I should be able to work that out! I don't think I'll be as ornate as Elockid's full page but a bar across the top should be doable..-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

My article

Hi,

You are trying to get my page deleted because it doesn't appeal to you.

The page is for a young professional footballer from Scotland who plays in the highest tier of Scottish football.

You may not know him but many do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammaman1 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

No, - only that your page has no references and when I did a google search the name didn't come up on the page so, since I couldn't tell who he was I requested deletion. If you have references that show him to be a professional footballer put them up on the page so we can see that he is notable.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Jammaman1: Please read Wikipedia:ATHLETE before you continue to work on this page. In general, if he has not played in a professional team's main squad in at least one game, he will have difficulty meeting Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations

what the fuck don't flag a page for deletion like an hour after the first part is placed in. fuck it; you make the page for the game. 24.85.254.33 (talk) 23:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC) (Baloogan)

If you make the page in your sandbox until you have the article finished someone can tell there will be more it probably wouldn't get tagged- in the meantime put in the rest of the content and the tag won't apply.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Jeffrey Loeffert

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hey Deb - I didn't add anything to Jeffrey Loeffert other than a copy vio tag that I can remember..Not sure who created that page or added to it Actually I do kno w- it was Kathytidwell - you might want to leave the note over there but other than that it wasn't me. -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Oops, sorry! Deb (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hee Oh

Dear Antiqueight,

Thanks for your message. As you can see from the text and associated links that I submitted, Hee Oh satisfies the notability criteria for academics 1 and 3 (and arguably also 5). She is very well known as an extraordinarily influential researcher in her area of mathematics, and has numerous publications in the highest-quality mathematics journals (JAMS, JEMS, Inventiones, etc.).

It is also well-established that women mathematicians are chronically underrepresented on wikipedia.

Best regards, 137.222.114.243 (talk) 16:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Bobby Roache

Bobbyroache, as page creator and presumably subject, blanked it so I tagged it for G7. It's not a great article, and if the creator wants rid of it, I'd be happy to see it gone. Hope that answers your question. James^x12345 21:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Surely as subject he has COI. The page has been there for almost 2 years. He is a reasonably notable male model and more so than many on Wikipedia. He is more notable than many people I have seen added. I don't see a reason to delete it? Besides the speedy selected as a result gave no option to disagree with the deletion and relied on an admin to dig into the pages history to see that it might be retainable or salvageable.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

If it is kept, it probably needs a bit of work to bring it up to scratch. James^x12345 22:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Dicksboro_GAA

Hi, please see about Dicksboro_GAA, thanks. Mrchris (talk) 00:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Replied on your page..Yell if I can help..But I know only what the web tells me about sport and Dickboro..-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 01:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, all good. replied on my page. Mrchris (talk) 01:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Spelling in quotations

Some of the "misspellings" you changed here are in direct quotations. These should never be changed; fidelity to the quoted source is paramount. jnestorius^(talk) 10:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Drat - I thought I pulled the quotes out - Obviously I missed. Thanks for spotting.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 13:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Justin Blackmon

The man was just suspended for a third time for substance abuse. He has all the talent in the world, a huge contract, and has acknowledged his failures and need to stay clean. I used "idiot" as a friendlier term than some other alternatives which would be entirely appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.77.143 (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Uri Geller edit

Uri Geller is a fraud, as are all psychics, and linking the word psychic to the article on fraud is appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeptic1337 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Fanta

Please check your reversion of my edit to Fanta. I think you restored vandalism that I had reverted. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes - Already left you comment and reverted my error. Clicked in wrong place while reading 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem. The important thing is ultimately to get it right. Donner60 (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Greta Adrian

Hello Antiqueight. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Greta Adrian, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 00:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note - Somehow I missed that even though, looking now, it's obvious. Glad you were looking.

-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 00:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Breezy

The editor was previously at level 2 for CSD removal, so I have trumped your warning :) Feel free to change that if you disagree. Fiddle Faddle 13:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

No - absolutely agree :-) -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 13:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Fuck help

• Fuck (film)

Thank you for your cleanup help at Fuck (film).

The article is currently at Featured Article discussion, your comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 17:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Ujjwal234goel. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Trællene / The Thralls, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually I tagged it for speedy deletion (which probably marked it as reviewed) but it looks like the creator removed the tag.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 17:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Slow down a bit

Thanks for all of your work with reviewing new pages. I know from experience that we need volunteers like you to do this type of work. However, can I ask you that you slow down slightly? For example, with this edit, you tagged an article for an A3 deletion only one minute after it was created. Fortunately, in this case, the article's creator went to the to the talk page to contest the deletion, and explain that it was the skeleton of a draft article for a school project (which meant userfying the draft for that purpose). However, many editors are turned off by having their articles tagged for deletion so quickly, and may not return to continue what they started.

As a rule of thumb, can I ask that you wait approximatley 15 minutes or so after an article is created before tagging it with A3 (unless it is obvious that it will not be expanded). There's really no rush, and this way we avoid biting the newbies. Thanks! Singularity42 (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Will do. -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 09:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

I will userfy the pages rather than delete too in future. I have done it before and forgot in the case above..-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 09:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

I've mentioned you at

WP:ANI#3 more paid editors? - you'll be interested! Dougweller (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you - indeed, interested.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 09:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Much appreciated

No, I'm glad you did. Any time you see it again, feel free! I see I've mysteriously been reported for vandalism now... Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, he seemed to be making a mistake. Lively few minutes though! Thanks for the support, Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Careful when reverting vandalism

Thanks for this revert of vandal edits by 197.214.99.23, but you forgot to look at the preceding edits by (almost the same) ip 197.214.99.1. It's always a good idea to also check what happened immediately before the act of vandalism that one takes care of. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Drat - I thought I reverted all the edits by that user. Oh wait - I see - right - almost but not the same IP - I didn't notice- I thought it was all the same one! Good note - I will watch for that.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 13:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Angiopoietin

Hi antiqueight - my Dev Bio class is just in the midst of revising 7 different pages relating to Dev Bio. They were moving out of their sandboxes into the main space this weekend. One of them is supposed to be the Angiopoietin page, and I just noticed this morning that instead of adding to that page, they created a brand new page Angiopoietin: Functions and Mechanisms. This was an error! They are right now in the process of combining the information they developed with the angiopoietin page current information (hopefully now in their sandbox, instead of the main space!). Once that is done, the Angiopoietin: Functions and Mechanisms page can go away. Sorry for the confusion- hopefully nothing ugly is left out there in the main space now. Hakeleh (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi - see note below..-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Angiopoietin: Function and Mechanisms

Hi Antiqueight, I'm in the process of moving the information to a separate page but was having technical difficulties. I'm currently working on integrating this information into another article. The Function and Mechanisms page will be deleted once the integration is complete. Thank you! Mbeez (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Sure - I noticed the Angiopoietin page later and wondered, but at the time I just saw that someone had blanked the angiopoietin: functions and mechanisms page at the time and it didn't have an edit summary so I assumed it was vandalism..I don't know enough about bio to know that it was only part of a page.. I wanted to go back and check once I saw a reference to the other page but ended up in the middle of something else and totally forgot about it.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:40, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Revleon response

http://www.awfulannouncing.com/2013/november/dan-sileo-is-up-to-his-old-tricks.html

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/blogs/chopping-block/os-dan-sileo-bounty-fsu-20131104,0,2875527.post

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1835492-former-miami-player-dan-sileo-puts-1000-bounty-on-fsu-rb-devonta-freeman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Revleon (talk • contribs) 22:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

So write it up and add it with appropriate sources -and only include what you can cite - these say nothing about the supplements and tanning beds for example.-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 22:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Yellow Pine, Alabama

I see what you mean about the original creation; thanks for fixing that. I probably would have just deleted it and started over. There's a general consensus that verifiable populated places are considered notable, though, even if they're very small places like Yellow Pine. I'll check sometime later for additional references; it's probably on a few highway maps, at least. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I probably would have deleted a few days prior but I had decided to save anything I could or move it in preference so I took a closer look...If you can find more that would be great..US locations are not my strong suit. -- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Christian mysticism????

Apparently I made an edit to the page Christian mysticism template, I have never been on that Wikipage and I don't contribute to Wikipedia because of lack of knowledge, I am just a user. Why did this happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.78.42.63 (talk) 06:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

thats fine but

you shouldnt have done that as it was factually correct Hitler's son's name actually was steven — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kolokolokolokolo (talk • contribs) 12:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)