User talk:Alsoriano97/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Alsoriano97. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for Bujar Nishani
On 2 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bujar Nishani, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Wp:Ani i opened a complain Baratiiman (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Zeta Emilianidou
On 7 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Zeta Emilianidou, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 23:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Metropolitan
Hey. Check out both Metropolis of Korea and Sotirios Trambas before you make the title Metropolitan lower case again at Deaths in 2022. The title is capitalized in both articles, so my restoration of it in his Deaths entry is based on that. Manual of Style Job Titles guidelines are not blanket guidelines - they exist to convert plain job titles to lower case, not to convert established capitalized honorifics in that way. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 13:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please ignore this errant comment (as you have). Ref (chew)(do) 06:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Marco Luzzago
On 15 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marco Luzzago, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Revert of Current Events
Given the 3RR rule, let's continue the discussion regarding the edit here. Please also note that you have reverted the edit 4 times now, and are in violation of the 3RR rule.
The comment on your most recent revert is as follows.
"If he doesn't even have a wikipedia article, do you really think his murder is notorious? It's not that hard to understand!! People are murdered EVERY day."
I would like to clarify that my intention in adding the entry is to highlight a murder (an extraordinary death), of a person in connection with a notable event which has its own page. Given that there is a page about the event, and the focus on the person is in connection to the event, I don't think whether or not this person has his own page is relevant.
I would also like to draw your attention to WP:CIVIL. I am sure you would agree statements such as "It's not that hard to understand!!" and "People are murdered EVERY day." would be considered stretching that guideline. Carter00000 (talk) 16:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The murdered person was not notable; thus, their murder does not belong on a Wikipedia current events page. Black Kite (talk) 19:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Black Kite, thank you for taking the time to reply to this discussion. I note that your rationale (similar to what Alsoriano97 said previously), is that person in questions was not notable. I would like to note that the aim of my entry was to highlight a murder (an extraordinary death), of a person in connection with a notable event which has its own page. Hence, I feel that in this case, whether the person is notable or not is not of primary concern.Carter00000 (talk) 07:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's exactly what Black Kite says. He may have been connected to a notorious event, but he wasn't a key part of it either, as he was acquitted and doesn't even have his own Wikipedia article. If he had been convicted, he would most likely be Current Events-worthy. And my apologies for being uneducated. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Black Kite, thank you for taking the time to reply to this discussion. I note that your rationale (similar to what Alsoriano97 said previously), is that person in questions was not notable. I would like to note that the aim of my entry was to highlight a murder (an extraordinary death), of a person in connection with a notable event which has its own page. Hence, I feel that in this case, whether the person is notable or not is not of primary concern.Carter00000 (talk) 07:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Portal:Current_events, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.
You understand that a national assembly, like the United States Congress has representatives who are elected to serve on that national assembly. The United States is, as you are well aware, one of the most important nations on earth. When one of the REPRESENTATIVES, not protestors, keep in mind, sorry if you were misinformed or did you read closely enough, but members of the CONGRESS were arrested in front of the US Supreme COURT. If you do not understand what happened, that is okay, you will learn and grow. This is an international story, so if you persist, you could face discipline for deleting and editing war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AggiesNeverLie (talk • contribs) 21:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vandalism? You've got to be kidding me. Vandalism is breaking the 3RR rule. Europe experiencing a historic heat wave and forest fires, a country slaughtered by Russia, global inflation, wars and famine in Africa. Do you really believe that the arrest of some American deputies (not even senators, considering that, as you should know, in the USA the senator takes precedence over the congressman) is an "international story"? Come on, man. Leave the USA-centrism in the drawer. Current Events doesn't work that way. Don't treat me like a fool and don't go thuggish on Wikipedia, either. Friendly advise. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Moreover, they are police arrests. A trifle. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Spanish-Angolan affair
That president you (and others) thought died blurbworthily died in a swank Barcelona hospital. He'd lived in a ill-gotten Spanish mansion after he could no longer milk Angola any drier. Maybe the blurb should have mentioned that instead of his boring routine age. Maybe the upcoming Spanish autopsy and burial will finally flesh out the woefully sketchy update to his article regarding the inconsequential news. Anyway, water under the bridge, just explaining (and musing aloud). InedibleHulk (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ahh, I see what you mean. I thought it was some kind of personal "attack". But thanks for the clarification! In any case, it has been curious how the Spanish press has treated almost nothing the fact that in a hospital in Barcelona has died someone with the importance that Dos Santos had... _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- I don't read much Spanish news, since I don't recognize most of the palabras, but this seems like more than almost nothing to me. For future reference, I'm pretty explicit in my (rare) personal attacks. If something I write seems unclear, there's no harm in asking! InedibleHulk (talk) 19:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Núria Feliu
On 23 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Núria Feliu, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2022
Hello, I'm Elijahandskip. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Portal:Current events/2022 August 1 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is not specifically directed toward an edit, but at an edit summary you wrote where you said “Stop with this American bias of Current Events
”, which appears to be written in a non-neutral point of view. [1]
On a side note, as you are probably aware, there is a discussion involving some of your edits in the past at AN/I. I wanted to let you know I asked you a question in the AN/I discussion. Elijahandskip (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Carter00000 (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- You aren't required to, but you really would do best to participate in this ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Dennis Brown Thanks for the note. I've been some days on vacation and in places with practically no signal or internet. In fact I’ve been more days with my Wikipedia activity very low, because I have other matters to dedicate time to and the same fact of disconnecting a little from the virtual world. I will try to answer tomorrow to the ANI. _-_Alsor (talk) 00:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for José Guirao
On 11 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article José Guirao, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Anarchyte (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for updating! - I went to a great concert last Friday, and took a pic of the happy conductor, with some good luck (further down on the page, with preview and review). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your suport Gerda Arendt! And thank you for making it possible for classical music to be present on Main Page. As a big fan too, sometimes it's good to see that in RD there are not only politicians and sportspeople! See you at Candidates ;) _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- we'll meet for sure, - this year I have all their names together in one spot on my talk, and it's overwhelming. For some reason, three from Hannover most recently, and before two giants, Taruskin and Brook. We also run a longer project list, DYK? - May I ask here again if I need another support? To wait for days for Brook - after he received five-digit view without us - was a bit strange. Different for Koerrpen, about whom only a three-digit number cared, - and almost more rewarding to bring those to light. I wish his wife a long life, she's 92. Happy that I managed her article already, and his last year, begun by a banned friend. For music!--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- ... and another concert 14 July: Voces8, pictured - I have a FAC open, in case of interest --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the music recommendations! Forgive me if in the end I did not support your nomination in DYK. With the heat wave and the work I've to do I haven't been very attentive. In any case, as soon as you have nominations in DYK and Candidates let me know. Best regards! _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Coming back to your offer: I have a Ukrainian librarian ITN who died on 1 August. Can't believe no comment in days, sigh. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'm going there! _-_Alsor (talk) 12:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Coming back to your offer: I have a Ukrainian librarian ITN who died on 1 August. Can't believe no comment in days, sigh. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the music recommendations! Forgive me if in the end I did not support your nomination in DYK. With the heat wave and the work I've to do I haven't been very attentive. In any case, as soon as you have nominations in DYK and Candidates let me know. Best regards! _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ali Haydar (Syrian army officer)
On 8 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ali Haydar (Syrian army officer), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 17:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Request for Arbitration Notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Conduct on Portal:Current Events and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Carter00000 (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Archiving
Hey, Alsorian97! Would you please set up archiving here for the convenience of other editors? Valereee (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Valereee hello! In fact, I've been wanting to do it for a long time, but I've never found the time to do it and I've been a little lazy to look for a way to do it. Right now I'm looking for a way to do it. Greetings! _-_Alsor (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- There's a super easy way at Help:Archiving (plain and simple). Just copy/paste/save, and you're good. Valereee (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration request declined
An arbitration case to which you were a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The declining arbitrators felt that the request was premature. For the Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alsoriano97
Hi, I saw you removed two of my three entries today to Current Events, about the Bali bomber and the Chinese Canadian billionaire.
No problem because I like to learn, what kind of crime cases are worth including? Is it massive cases such as the entry I myself made yesterday of the Hong Kong national security law case? Thank you and I await your response. Best wishes. 190.246.97.81 (talk) 11:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I really don't see that these are cases that can be assimilated. The conviction of a Chinese-Canadian billionaire and the release of a terrorist are common and ordinary judicial acts, which don't generate a major impact (beyond the occasional "angry" country) and have minimal international coverage. Maybe you can convince me and I will respect its re-inclusion. _-_Alsor (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I understand, no no no no, I didn't mean this thread to change your mind. I'm learning. Yes, a single terrorist being released is not the same as shaping the democratic process of a territory like the Hong Kong case. I do understand. Thank you and I will have it in mind before adding, and If committing the same mistake again, it's common to stumble upon the same rock for humans. Thanks Alsoriano97. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.246.97.81 (talk) 11:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Rolando Cubela Secades
On 29 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rolando Cubela Secades, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Mayors of City of San Marino
Category:Mayors of City of San Marino only contains one page so far, so I have proposed merging it to both parents. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 7#Category:Mayors of City of San Marino. – Fayenatic London 06:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
QEII
Here is the discussion: WP:In_the_news/Candidates#Ongoing_Removal:_QE_II. I made the same mistake when I nominated it for removal. I hope you don't mind I deleted your duplicate. Polyamorph (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, I hadn't noticed. I thought it was strange that it had not already been nominated. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Current events noticeboard
{{CEN noticeboard}} Szmenderowiecki (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Uhm…hi? _-_Alsor (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry
On 12 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 20:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Too local" attempted assassination on Nancy
With all due respect, how is the attempted assassination of one of the most senior politicans in the U.S. considered "too local?" So what if she wasn't there, the intent behind the attack was there, and it obviously affected someone extremely close to her. Okay, so Paul's not a politician himself... so? Nearly every day there's one or more stories featured about random soldiers/other individuals being shot and/or blown up in some daily event. So very often do I see a feature about yet another U.S. shooting, which too, has become an all too common and not that noteworthy event outside of the "local" area in most cases. Some exceptions exist obviously. Feels like a weekly event where some bus of people careens off a ledge in India or elsewhere. How are any of these more noteworthy than an attempted assassination on the third highest ranking officer in the U.S. government???? Gamermadness (talk) 02:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You are mixing a lot of things up. Who would think of mixing the assault on someone who is not even political, relevant, known or important outside the United States with events in a European country that is being invaded or in a civil war in an African or Asian country? It's nonsense. Fortunately, the world is much bigger than the United States, and its third authority is still just as relevant as the third authority of any other country: little outside their country, very little. But that has happened to her husband, not even to her! If it had happened in another country, what would you think? I'm thinking exactly the same, I'm not so clear with you and so many other editors. And no, Nancy is not part of the US government. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- But it's not notable because it's an assault on some random person, it's notable because it was likely an assassination attempt against his wife, who IS a politician, relevant, and known. You indicated in your edit summaries that if it WAS her that was attacked, then you'd think it would deserve to be there, so why do you think that an attempted attack on her doesn't?
- Also, yes, she is part of the US government. What makes you think she isn't? She's the third in line in the United States presidential line of succession --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Nancy is quite literally the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The House of Representatives is one-half of the United States Congress. The United States Congress is the legislature of the United States Government... so she most certainly is a part of the aforementioned government... Gamermadness (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The HoR is the legislative power, not the executive one. Not the same. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- That doesn't make her not part of the US government --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 23:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Again, she is not part of the US government. Read separation of powers. _-_Alsor (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- I suspect there may be some language barrier here, or a lack of understanding between a parliamentary system and a presidential system, or simply the US calling things differently than others. I know that in Westminster systems, the executive is chosen by parliament and they form their "government" consisting of themselves and a cabinet of other ministers. A cursory viewing of Cortes Generales suggests that Spain's parliamentary system is similar. In the US, however, "the government" is not a reference to the president and their cabinet (which are appointed individuals, not elected), but a reference to the entire system of governance, which, as an elected representative, she is most certainly a part of. --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ohh I see, then it is clear that we were talking about different things. Thanks for the clarification. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for Constantine II of Greece
On 17 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Constantine II of Greece, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 04:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Portal:Current events/2023 January 17
Thank you for your edit summary arguing why Lucile Randon's death should not be included. Kindly enlighten me further why "being the longest-lived person in the world is an unquestionable merit, but in practice it is not 'useful.'" Nabi Tajima, Violet Brown and Emma Morano's deaths were included in their respective current events portal. Why shouldn't Randon's? Thank you. signed, Pat talk 10:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Patrick Cristiano hello! Thank you for going to my Talk Page so I can explain myself better. I was honestly unaware that Nabi Tajima, Violet Brown and Emma Morano were included in Current Evenets and, at the time, I would have removed them. When I say that being the longest-lived person in the world is not something "useful", something "practical", I mean that its impact (national, international, local...), beyond the symbolic and anecdotal, is non-existent. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Álvaro Colom
On 29 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Álvaro Colom, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 21:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Constantine II
Hi. I have tried nominating Constantine II of Greece to become a good article, but since I have only contributed 3% to the article (despite the fact that it is the fourth highest by a user and I am very familiar with the article and the subject – I created most of this article), I am not considered a "significant contributor". So I have come to you to ask you if you would be willing to nominate the article, which you have contributed 34% to. Please reply when you can. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Therealscorp1an Sure! I take note. Thank you for the proposal. I will keep you informed. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! That is much appreciated. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Good evening @Therealscorp1an. I just nominated him. Let's see if we get lucky! _-_Alsor (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Great, thank you! Funny you tell me now, I'm actually just working on adding to another article about him! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds great! Any help you need, just let me know. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think it should be alright. It was a huge struggle to get photos for the page, but it finally got done, which I am still very pleased about. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds great! Any help you need, just let me know. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Great, thank you! Funny you tell me now, I'm actually just working on adding to another article about him! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Good evening @Therealscorp1an. I just nominated him. Let's see if we get lucky! _-_Alsor (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! That is much appreciated. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Constantine II of Greece
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Constantine II of Greece you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Llewee -- Llewee (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Help
Gerda Arendt TheScrubby Jim Michael 2 Hello mates! I’m having serious problems with user Carter00000. He/she goes to the admins for any edit of mine that he doesn't like so that they block my account (as it currently stands) before going the more civilized and friendly route of understanding, which is what WP's own rules advise. He/she is deeply monitoring my activity, and that worries me to the extent that it doesn't make me feel that I edit freely. I feel harassed and threatened. This attitude has been criticized before by other users such as Deb and Blackite (and I think Jim Michael did too) and frankly there comes a point where it becomes harassment on a personal basis that’s intolerable. Before the end of 2022 I showed him my intention to try to maintain a better way to resolve our differences. And you know what? They ignored me, so it’s clear that they wants to continue with this hostile and dangerous attitude (I don’t know why). I come to you in case you could give me some advice and help. Frankly, I don't know how to go about it. You are the editors with whom I have had the best relationship so far and we have had a very interesting and constructive collaboration (which I would not like to lose). Best regards to all three of you. Thanks in advance. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Btw TheScrubby, I just saw that you intend to retire. Bad news! I hope it's only temporary. Time off is always deserved and advised. We would lose a good editor! _-_Alsor (talk) 21:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Only just noticed this. Not a lot I can do at the moment, but I'm going to keep an eye on developments. Deb (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for 2023 Andorran parliamentary election
On 6 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Andorran parliamentary election, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 02:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Alsoriano97. Thank you for your work on Juan Francisco García Sánchez. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tails Wx 18:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Tails Wx: Thanks!! _-_Alsor (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Reverts on 2023
For your reverts on 2023, I've corrected the format for the story on Russia. For the story on the US, I've left it out, as it does not seem to be of enough significant notability to be included on the page.
As mentioned in my edit summary, this was the second edit made by the account. Please review WP:BITE, specifically "Improve, Don't Remove. If something doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, try to fix the problem rather than just remove what's broken. (Nothing stops new contributors from coming back like having all their hard work end up in the bit bucket.)"
I've left a note on the editors talk page User_talk:Paulthegoatfp5#2023.
Carter00000 (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- At least there has been one regular editor on that page who has thanked me for my editing. Surely they have a good reason. Thank you, at least, for doing your edit in a friendly way, this time. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- I thank you as well for your friendly response to this message, which I really appreciate. Carter00000 (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Josep Piqué
On 11 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Josep Piqué, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 17:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josep Piqué, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages El Mundo and Aznar government.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)