Jump to content

User talk:Clpo13/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

A cup of coffee for you!

Welcome to the mop corps, Clpo13. Your successful RFA's only the beginning; prepare to have to clean up after all the vandals and the hooligans and the messmakers! Before you start practicing your mop-fu skills, sit down and have a drink. A recent Lord Jimbo Decree has prohibited admins from drinking on the job, but coffee is fine. So, have some coffee! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
ALL HAIL LORD JIMBO OF THE CABAL!!! Gestrid (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

FYI – 176.126.225.170

You and Widr both conflicted different block durations with this IP address. 45.123.197.254 (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I've updated the block to what Widr had set. clpo13(talk) 17:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Curreweqds

There is nothing that precludes speedy deletion of something at XFD. It's clear that this page was a test page, and so it should be speedied as such. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: I agreed with John of Reading's rationale for leaving it at MFD instead of speedying. But if you want to tag it again, I won't object. clpo13(talk) 19:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Of interest Woody (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Late I know, but congrats on your successful RFA! lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

I'm late to the party but congratulations on passing your RfA! —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Sorry I'm late but hey late's better than never :),

Anyway just wanted to say Congratulations on your RFA :)
Happy blocking :), –Davey2010Talk 16:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Why was my Madison Spelling Bee page removed? Need assistance please.

Hello,

On Wednesday evening, a friend and myself established a new Madison All-City Spelling Bee page on Wikipedia.

Suddenly I see that you deleted my page...why?? I had wanted to spend the weekend filling in the blacks with the information and names of winners from 1949 to 2017 but now its gone...the link was this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Madison_All-City_Spelling_Bee

and I then wanted this Madison All-City Spelling Bee page then be connected/linked to the state spelling bee page we also created on Wednesday night, to be seen here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Badger_State_Spelling_Bee

Can you please, who ever you are, answer why the Madison spelling bee page was taken down by you before I had the chance this weekend to fill in the blanks for both pages on Wikipedia.

Thanks, and instead of using message system, email me directly with your answers and helpful information.

Jay WisconsinHistorian@Hotmail.com

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JRWisconsin (talkcontribs) 23:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

First day covers

I noticed you added ticket references to these 3 images: File:David Bowie Music Icons.jpg, File:Hornby cover.jpg and File:James Bond cover.jpg‎. Obviously I'm not sure yet what Buckingham Covers is going to provide OTRS with but I am pretty sure you are aware that Royal Mail stamps are covered by Crown copyright that lasts for 50 years and I very much doubt they can provide evidence that Royal Mail has relinquished those rights to a stamp dealer, allowing commercial and derivative use of their modern stamps. I also have concerns about the Hornby logo, the Thomas the Tank Engine stamp, and the background cover photo of the David Bowie envelope. I mention this because the uploader appears to be the website marketing assistant for the company (see: [11]) whose business is the sell first day covers like this, which is a conflict of interest and when I pointed this out on their talk page the uploader did not know about crown copyright. As a non-OTRS editor it is not my place to tell you your job but as a long time knowledgable philatelist I suggest a rather close review of any permission provided. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Antikythera mechanism

Thanks for applying semi-protection, it was about time, and very distracting with pending-changes protection. — PaleoNeonate — 18:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

One sad puppy for you, for finally protecting Antikythera mechanism. And it only took four RFPP posts for someone to notice. TimothyJosephWood 18:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to the Admin corps

Welcome to the admin corps. You will find that you do your job incorrectly all the time. Now get to work, and good luck. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

^^^ This is incorrect. --NeilN talk to me 17:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
--TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Congrats C. A well deserved awarding of the mop and pail. MarnetteD|Talk 19:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations. Just saw you doing admin stuff here and here. Right on those controversial articles, I see. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of unusual deaths

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of unusual deaths. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Clpo13,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Misguided blocking

You have blocked me at the complaint of user:Lugnuts for my "vandalism" of the Basil Thampi page. In fact, I am the aggrieved party. Cricketer Basil Thampi has won an award at the IPL 2017 final last night, shown on television, reported in every single Indian newspaper this morning. Yet, Lugnuts will not allow me to add one simple sentence saying that the award has been given to Thampi. This is not just a classic example of intimidation of IPs and sheer arrogance, but also violates several Wikipedia policies such as WP:OWN and WP:3RR. Your blocking me has clearly not worked, but you should block Lugnuts for violating WP:3RR. 59.182.181.221 (talk) 08:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Maybe you should follow the advice given by me and Lugnuts and add a source. But it'd be wise to wait until the block is expired in 31 hours. clpo13(talk) 08:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
I am astonished that you blocked my second IP -- you can block this third also, if you think it worthwhile. But I want to bring something else to your notice. I have been trying to figure out why exactly Lugnuts is to this extent inimical to my very simple sentence being included on the Basil Thampi page. Especially when it would be a simple matter for him to add a source (any newspaper or news website, for instance this) and make that minor edit himself, instead of edit-warring to the extent of violating 3RR. I think I have it. I have had nothing to do in the past with Lugnuts, but from his edit history, he seems to be of Sri Lankan ethnicity, whereas Basil Thampi is of part-Tamil, part-Malyali ethnicity, hailing from the extreme south of India. The Sri Lankan Civil War page will tell you of the ethnic animus between the two groups over the past several decades. It is of course impossible to prove that Lugnuts is motivated by ethnic animus in wanting to keep out a sentence about Thampi's recent award, but is it proper to allow him Ownership of that page given this possibility? 59.182.158.184 (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Clpo13 - this IP is still continuing to revert this by jumping from account to account. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, IP, for providing a source. Finally. I have done your work for you and added it to the article. In future, please provide sources when you add material. And do not impugn other users, it is considered personal attacking. Thank you and have a pleasant day. --Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders15:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

22:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
good folk Arysh (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Apologies

i am sorry. that was a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.68.31.247 (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Following up

Hello, Clpo13. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

LokiTalk19:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Why was List of Ukrainians of Russian ethnicity protected

Why did you protect List of Ukrainians of Russian ethnicity on the version that removes the whole list, instead of protecting it on this version?

[13]

?

Such pages exist for most significant minority groups, e.g. Lists of Irish Americans, Russian Jews, Italians in Britain, Arabs in Spain, etc. It's not racism, it's giving recognition to the presence of ethnic minorities in societies and the role they play.

And most important, Wikipedia support and encourage such pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.120.135.112 (talk) 07:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

The page was protected to prevent further disruption caused by reverting back and forth. If you disagree with the redirection that was done in November 2016, you should try to find consensus for a different outcome on the article talk page. clpo13(talk) 04:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

I've tried, I started a discussion on the talk page - ignored. So if some vandal decides to remove a whole page because it doesn't suit their POV and naturally ignores the talk page as he's not there to find a consensus, I should just ignore it? What I'm doing is protecting an article from being removed by a vandal, that's all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.90.76.213 (talk) 11:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of events related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikiwikiwiki88 is back on Karen Bass

On Karen Bass (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) he is back to messing up the format of the article. As this is not the first time they have done this, I didn't revert them, in case special treatment was in order. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

@L3X1: Thanks for the heads up. It looks like they've self-reverted their edits, but I'll keep an eye on the page. clpo13(talk) 22:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug BellDennis BrownClpo13ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusBYandmanBjarki SOldakQuillShyamJondelWorm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Maltese general election, 2017

Can you review the article Maltese general election, 2017 and see if any of my claims are correct? Thanks for tagging me for the claim made against me by an admin who clearly does not care of standards and NPOV. I have nothing against the editor but went too far and is supporting non-registered editors and their agenda. Just in case you tell me, I can abstain from editing that article as I have nothing to gain from it. You can view my edits and check that most are not related to political activity, and that some editors have been inserting bias in that which I tried to remove until furter court conclusions are made. Google about Malta and subject-related which is weitten in it. The Times of Malta is most neutral. Others are government or opposition media mainly. Cheers.Continentaleurope (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Thomas J. Cahill's Wiki Page

I understand what you are saying, but he is my great grandfather so I do know these facts. This is my family so yes, the sources are reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanFranciscoRemembers (talkcontribs) 18:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't doubt that, SanFranciscoRemembers, but Wikipedia requires sources that readers can check themselves, per the verifiability policy. Those sources can be websites, books, newspaper clippings, or anything that has been previously published. clpo13(talk) 18:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
I understand you doubt it, but if You had read what I wrote, I am his great grand daughter Meghan Elizabeth Spalding. I just wanted to add onto his profile and put what should be put. I really reallt hope you will consider allowing me to do this because it means a lot to me! He was my great grandfather and I am sorry if that is hard to believe but please trust me. You read what I said right? I didn't just put stupid stuff on the page, I put the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanFranciscoRemembers (talkcontribs) 18:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Clpo13

Just wanted to give you a very belated congrats on getting the RFA mop! (I haven't been actively editing for about a month, but I'd figured I'd present you a hardy congrats prior to disappearing again.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much Steel1943! clpo13(talk) 21:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

Please comment on Talk:Sciences Po

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sciences Po. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I need help...

I need help reporting a possible edit war but I use the mobile version of the website and I don't understand how to do it. If I gave you the links could you do it for me? Dinah Kirkland (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

@Dinah Kirkland: I can certainly do that. clpo13(talk) 18:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mimiddu That is the user. For the page it was this;

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_profanity

My original edit was; cazzo (pl. cazzi) [ˈkattso]: Fuck or in some cases fucking. It is highly recommended that while in Italy its best not to say this.

It was changed to;

cazzo (pl. cazzi) [ˈkattso]: literally dick, cock, prick. Used in countless expressions to express a variety of feelings like anger, frustation or surpise in a similar way in which "fuck" and "Fucking" are used in English.

Which is incorrect. I reverted their edits once and they changed it back. I tried to discuss it on their userpage but they ignored me. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

It would be of great help if you did this. The change has gone from passive to offensive on that page. Well at least to me. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 18:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

@Dinah Kirkland: I've taken a look at the page. The dispute is a couple of days old now, so there's not really any action I can take at the moment. My advice to you would be to try your change again (making sure it's supported by sources, per WP:V). If it's disputed again, start a discussion on the talk page explaining your change so other editors of that page can chime in and hopefully come to a consensus about how it should be worded. By using the article talk page, you can reach more people than by posting on another user's talk page (though that's a good start and it's unfortunate that Mimiddu never responded). If that doesn't work, you can follow the steps at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. I hope that helps. clpo13(talk) 19:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! I will do that. Grazie (Thank you) Dinah Kirkland (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Cyclops

Greetings..The protection of the "Cyclops" page is a mistake .... there is a discussion that clarifies everything in the Talk page (the motivation is also visible from the page history)--151.57.23.72 (talk) 20:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The page was protected to prevent further edit warring. The discussion on the talk page hasn't been added to in a month and it doesn't look like there was ever consensus to remove material. I'd suggest reviving that discussion or seeking dispute resolution. clpo13(talk) 20:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

B4 clarification

A clarification to WP:UP/RFC2016 § B4 has been proposed. You participated in that discussion; your input is welcome at Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring/B4 clarification. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 15:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
"useless without images"
... you were recipient
no. 1416 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Gant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Gant. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Please comment on Talk:George Harrison

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Harrison. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Clpo13, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harry Lauder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harry Lauder. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

15:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added AnarchyteGeneralizationsAreBadCullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed CpromptRockpocketRambo's RevengeAnimumTexasAndroidChuck SMITHMikeLynchCrazytalesAd Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news


The Signpost: 5 August 2017

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Clpo13, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Kaczynski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Kaczynski. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

22:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added NakonScott
removed SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

19:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Clpo13, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Algerian War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Algerian War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

16:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said ZebedeeAnsh666Ad Orientem
removed TonywaltonAmiDanielSilenceBanyanTreeMagioladitisVanamonde93Mr.Z-manJdavidbJakecRam-ManYelyosKurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ducati Monster

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ducati Monster. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Clpo13, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017