User talk:PrairieKid/Archive 23
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PrairieKid. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Monday, December 23, 5:30pm PST
|
Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Monday, December 23, 5:30pm PST. You can join us virtually from your PC, Mac, Linux, iOS, or Android at this link: https://virginia.zoom.us/my/wikilgbt. The address of the physical meeting is: Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102) 47°37′23″N 122°19′22″W / 47.622928°N 122.322912°W
The event page is here. You do not have to be a member to attend, but only members can vote in board elections. New members may join in person by completing the membership registration form onsite or (to be posted) online and paying $5 for a calendar year / $0.50 per month for the remainder of a year. Current members may renew for 2019 at the meeting as well.
|
Ways to improve The Ride of a Lifetime
Hello, PrairieKid,
Thank you for creating The Ride of a Lifetime.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add at least 2-3 more sources. As the page is quite short, any additional cited information would be a welcome addition to the article. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence (talk) 05:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, I was the editor who moved Rocky De La Fuente (RDLF) to the major candidates section. You stated in your edit summary, "Per prior consensus, reverting Rocky back to a non-major candidate." But in this case, the circumstances that created the prior consensus had changed. Specifically, RDLF previously hadn't been included in 5 independent national polls, and now he has been. So he changed from not meeting one of the criteria to be considered a major candidate, to meeting that criterion. When you wrote, "A user with [[WP:POV[[ made the change", did you mean me? I don't have a pro-RDLF point of view, nor do I think other Wikipedia editors would consider me to have such a POV. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Metropolitan90:: As I said in a reply on the talk page, it was my error. I incorrectly assumed the user making the 3 edits prior to mine had made the change. That user is a newcomer and has some...interesting edit summaries. Hopefully you understand where my confusion came from and can accept my sincere apology. I certainly would not for a second have questioned you or your neutrality.
- I want to keep the discussion on RDLF in one place, so I'll ask that you see my reply on that page. I am glad we could have the personal discussion here as well; hopefully, we have cleared the air. Respectfully, PrairieKid (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Emma Vigeland
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Emma Vigeland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Vigeland. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Incumbents' ages
Thank you for editing the US senate election articles. I see you just added the incumbents' ages. I suggest, however, that the ages should not be included. Although I've seen it elsewhere, and it's sometimes a tradition, I think, perhaps, we ought not to continue it that way. What do you think? Thank you. —GoldRingChip 18:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- @GoldRingChip: I understand what you're saying but I think the ages are important. Now, they should not be the only important item of information next to their experience level. I think the perfect article would include the number of terms they've each served, the likely opponents, perhaps some polling/predictions, and some brief prose about the race, as well as their ages. The ages are an important factoid in terms of whether or not the Senator will consider retiring, and also plays a role in voters' decisions. Again, I wish it was not the only tidbit of information but it is important nonetheless. Would you be willing to revert or go to the TP? PrairieKid (talk) 00:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- If they retire, then their age is moot. If they don't, then it's prejudicial (one way or the other). I suggest we leave age in only if it becomes a relevant issue, such as when they themselves cite it or when an opponent uses it against them. —GoldRingChip 00:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kathy Castor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emory College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
IKA Torino
Look man, I'm an Argentinian dude who lives in the USA, all the things ive written in the article are from old local magazines an interviews, its all true, you can investigate if you want, but, please, why did you reverted all my changes? All I wanted to do is to show the world what it is that car for my country, rewriting the History, cause some things were wrong, do whatever you want, but as I told you, could you please at least tell me why did you did it? Tomsbatz01 (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gretchen Whitmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Koiszków,Poland
On the Polish Wikipedia it says the population of koiszków is 65 not 1,004.Also as me and my German family LIVE in Koiszków so the percentage of Germans will increase. As a result of this German is spoken by 15% making it a big minority . thank you. Szmuklerkacper (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Hello, I'm 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:8992:65DB:F533:83BA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Denny Sanford Premier Center have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:8992:65DB:F533:83BA (talk) 05:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Blankfish
36 hour timeout? Seriously? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: Haha! Looks like he was counting down the seconds before he could go again. I think the admins are going to take it a bit more seriously this time around. Thanks for your diligence and reporting! PrairieKid (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Now permablocked. Thankfully much faster this time. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)