User talk:STH235SilverLover

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hi, mind if I nominate Tachikawa air disaster for DYK? Thanks, Matty.007 19:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

And 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance? (Note: if I don't get a reply in the negative by 13 September/14 September, I will nominate the first page for DYK, the second on 14/15, as otherwise they will become ineligible. Thanks, Matty.007 16:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


Hello STH235SilverLover, and Welcome to Wikipedia!New-Bouncywikilogo.gif

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. Please bear in mind that we are all people (except for the bots), even I am a person. As such, please treat us all with respect.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page, or ask ata the Teahouse, a collection of experienced editors.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Getting started:

Additional tips...

You are now a Registered Editor, and entitled to display this Service Badge.

STH235SilverLover, good luck, and have fun.Matty.007 19:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities[edit]

Great job on the new articles you created. It's great to see them added to the list. I wanted to give you a heads-up that I undid two of your changes: Delta 191 and Eastern 401. You added two more fatalities to each accident but because they did not occur immediatley after the crash, the NTSB reports for both accidents ruled them as non-fatal deaths. I know this is a bit of an oxymoron, but it keeps the numbers standardized across the board. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 04:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tachikawa air disaster[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • unless they were posted on Google+. So far, the petition has received over 25,000 signatures.<ref>[
  • google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#|publisher= Change.Org}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

1976 Zagreb mid-air collision[edit]

I suppose it makes a bit of a change from drive-by anons making the change without explanation, but please can you explain why you have changed the type of aircraft to a -31 when the sources clearly state it's a -32? Pinkbeast (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Some say it's a -31, others say it's a -32. Although I never cited it, Aviation Safety Network is what I used as an info source when I made that change. See, when I work on articles relating to aviation mishaps, I usually use ASN as my primary source of info—though I vehemently disagree with ASN on the subject American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 (the airplanes that were hijacked and crashed into the Twin Towers in 9/11) being the two worst "accidents" on U.S. soil and/or involving the Boeing 767 (those distinctions rightfully go to American Airlines Flight 191 and Lauda Air Flight 004, respectively). --STH235SilverLover (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

... and presumably there's an even chance that it's always Aviation Safety Network or the book it refers to, which explains why every n months someone else comes by to make the same edit. Ha.
The AAIB report consistently has it as a -32. If,YU-AJR-Inex-Adria-Airways.php is to be believed (I don't know if that's an RS, but it forms part of a consistent whole), it was built as a -31 in '74 and modified to a -32 in March '76, which is consistent with the AAIB report listing an export license date of MArch 1976. Pinkbeast (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cubana de Aviación Flight 9646, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 20:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to 2012 Aéro-Service Ilyushin Il-76T crash, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 22:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

References needed[edit]

G'day from Oz. I have just looked at 1968 Kham Duc C-130 shootdown; you have listed two book pages as references but you have not mentioned the books themselves. Could you please add them when you get a chance (see the References section of Lockheed L-188 Electra as an example). Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 01:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Article creation templates[edit]

A wide variety of standardised templteat for creating aviationarticles (including aircraft accidents/incidents etc.) can be found at Template:WPAVIATION creator

Happy editting--Petebutt (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1940 Deutsche Lufthansa Ju 90 crash, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Icing and Berlin Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 1979 Dniprodzerzhynsk mid-air collision. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer Talk 21:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Oh, for the love of...! Didn't the pages I edited have sufficient sources already? --STH235SilverLover (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Do not violate WP:NOTAFORUM again. You haven been warned many times, and yet you continue to use talk pages as a forum for voicing your personal opinions. Any more of this will get you a block. Only use talk pages to discuss editing an article. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 16:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  • OK, OK, I get the message! Jeez, it's not like I committing such violations INTENTIONALLY, y'know! --STH235SilverLover (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
You were warned multiple times to stop, so I don't know how you can claim it was accidental. But regardless, now you know, so hopefully we won't have any more troubles. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Asiana Airlines Flight 214, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Removal of valid content without an edit summary is often considered vandalism Robert McClenon (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

December 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Content needs to be well-sourced. Also, content should not go in the LEAD unless it is already in the article. - MrX 18:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Pan Am Flight 843 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pan Am Flight 843 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan Am Flight 843 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YSSYguy (talk) 09:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please see my comments at AfD. Mjroots (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Please do not remove large amounts of sourced information, as you did in this edit. If you're going to make a massive change to an article and its scope of what it covers, its usually be best to discuss beforehand on the talk page, and only make the change if there is consensus to do so. You didn't even bother to explain through an edit summary.

It looks like you've been warned about this sort of thing in the past. Please start taking these warnings seriously, or you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015[edit]

  • This edit is exactly the same sort of thing I was warning you about last February. Don't remove large amounts of sourced content without explanation. This is the last warning on this - next time you will be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 12:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Takamagahara not Osutaka[edit]

The plane crashed into Takamagahara not the other (see [1]). Quis separabit? 19:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

November 2015[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aeroflot Flight 7425. Jetstreamer Talk 22:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)