Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Archive 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13

User:Pleasant1623

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Plea$ant 1623 11:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator observation) Why are you requesting this? Reviewer rights were only used with the WP:Pending changes feature trial and that feature has been removed. Being a reviewer is currently meaningless. (Although if they still give reviewer out for some reason, I'd like it too.) (That was a joke.) Specs112 t c 12:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I can't find anywhere that reviewer rights are used for WP:AFT5.Could you please link any article which states this?Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 18:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
We held a Request for Comment here; I feel kinda leery about adding it into policy in my "official" role - staffers and policy shouldn't mix. However, you're right; it should totally be added and I am sorry for forgetting it. Does anyone want to volunteer? Ironholds (talk) 18:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I changed the section title to "Article Feedback Reviewer". It's possible, of course, that this permission will be extended in discussions at WT:PC/RFC2012, but it's important, I think, not to try to preempt the coming discussion there. I don't think it hurts anything not to move the page (from .../Reviewer), as long as the current purpose is clear. - Dank (push to talk) 18:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Well if I'm reading right, it looks like that RfC has now been closed and passed - that is, PC is being turned back on. Ironholds (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure what concerning Article feedback should be added, else I would have added it to Wikipedia:Reviewing. If you drop some related links and suggested text to my talk, I'll add them for you, else, I don't think it's a big deal for you to do so if you like, Ironholds. - jc37 20:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Basically just a note saying "this user right is also used for"... I'll add it now :). Ironholds (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Well if I'm reading right, it looks like that RfC has now been closed and passed - that is, PC is being turned back on. Ironholds (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Correct, and the closing statement implies that the community hasn't decided yet what the process for granting reviewership will be; that and other things will be discussed and decided between now and November 1. Btw, currently The Blade and I are the only two who have volunteered for the bear pit closing that discussion. - Dank (push to talk) 20:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
FWIW, I get that we don't want to turn on PC and then go looking for reviewers, and I'll suggest that we tackle the topic of reviewer permissions sooner rather than later in the ongoing PC discussions ... and several others have mentioned the same thing. - Dank (push to talk) 20:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
So... how actually is this going to work? Is reviewer being brought back now? I'm not sure how I feel about pending changes making a comeback (I hadn't come back from wikibreak yet when the RFC was held). Also, it amuses me that we're using this request as a forum, but nobody has actually done the original requester's request yet. Specs112 t c 20:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the pending changes is reactivating on December 1st.--Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 01:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Anderson9990

I would quite like to be a reviewer, so i can use the AFT5 tool.Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 23:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm hesitant to do so because you're quite new, but I won't decline outright. Could another admin please take a gander? Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 04:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
I have. Looks generally like a well-meaning editor. But, I too am hesitant. - jc37 04:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
so what are you thinking? do you want me to come back after i've been here longer?--Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 04:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
I notice you've actually asked Keilana on her talk page (among several others), so I think I'll defer to her on this. - jc37 04:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
sorry about that mistake.--Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 04:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Ack, I was hoping to defer to another admin. Here's my thinking on the subject. You've just gotten rollback and you're doing quite well under ItsZippy's tutelage in the CVUA. That's awesome, and I think you should focus on that for the time being, and definitely read up on policies and guidelines when you're not vandal-whacking. Handling feedback from users just a few weeks less experienced than you - as I understand it - may be a bit much for someone who's still getting their wiki-legs. God knows it took me a few months to have a decent handle on all the policies, and that was several years ago. So I would take it slow and not take on too many tasks at once. Again, if another passing admin thinks you'd make good use of the tool, I'm not going to wheel-war or dispute that decision, but I don't want to flag you right now. Keilana|Parlez ici 05:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Cyan Gardevoir

Again, so I can use the AFT5 tool and handle feedback. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 08:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Specs112

I'd like Reviewer so I can handle feedback with the AFT5 as well. I've been a rollbacker for a while, and I think I'm pretty familiar with what it would take to be a reviewer. Specs112 t c 12:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Electriccatfish2

I would like to be able to use the new Article Feedback Tool and handle feedback, as well. I am currently a rollbacker and am a CVUA instructor and have been around for over a year with over 5,000 edits. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 12:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Theopolisme

As other users have mentioned previously, I would like to be able to use the new AFT5 system - I do a lot of Feedback Dashboard (for new users') work, am an instructor and graduate in the CVUA, have Rollback, and would love to be able to keep contributing to the Wiki and helping the newbies! Theopolisme TALK 15:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Dan653

Same as above two. Word travels fast. If you guys need accredidation I've been around for nine months, have over 3,000 edits mostly to revert vandalism, have gotten over 20 users blocked at wp:aiv, and I am a rollbacker. Thanks in advance Dan653 (talk) 00:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Dan653 (talk) 00:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Till I Go Home

I would like Reviewer rights so I can handle feedback with AFT5. I also have rollback rights, and have made over 6,500 edits to Wikipedia. Till I Go Home talk 07:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Achowat

Would like to use the Feedback forms to help out new users, if the need exists. Achowat (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 10:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Chip123456

So I can have access to the AFT5 tool and handle feedback. I have rollback rights and I am an instructor at WP:CVUA. Chip123456 (talk) 16:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 10:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Ceradon

I would like to help out with AFT5. I have a 3,000+ edits and quite a bit of vandalism reverts. Ceradon talkcontribs 20:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 10:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Edinburgh Wanderer

To help out with AFT5 for feedback and eventually with pending changes when it returns. Edinburgh Wanderer 20:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 10:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Vibhijain

I would like to help with AFT5, and it will also help in case PC comes again ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
{{Already done}} confirmed by KingpinBot (talk · contribs) (this user currently has the reviewer flag. Admins: remember to use a {{done}} template or alternative so the bot knows what the intended result is) - KingpinBot (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
The rights log doesn't shows any such thing. Maybe its a bot error. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done It was indeed an error, and I feel like you have enough clue to be a reviewer. I've flagged you - please ask if you have any questions. Keilana|Parlez ici 07:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Benzband

I am a rollbacker and have been participating in the AFTv5 process, where the reviewing permission will enable feedback monitoring. When PC is reinstated, i could lend a hand in that area too. benzband (talk) 12:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 08:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Jeffwang

I have rollbacker rights already and I'd like to review articles, especially some under-/un-developed articles that may need some "feedback". --J (t) 16:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Rollbackers also have the right to review the feedback.—cyberpower ChatOnline 22:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 08:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Adjwilley

I'm interested in helping helping out with the new AFTv5 tool (functions like hiding unconstructive feedback/viewing hidden feedback). I realize this can also be done with rollbacker rights, but I'm not particularly interested in those since I'm not a huge vandal fighter and I can do roughly the same thing with Twinkle anyway. Also, as you probably know, Pending Changes is coming back in December, so I figure I might as well get the reviewer right for that too. (As a side note, the edit notice for this page should probably be updated.) ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 08:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:DoriSmith

I am a rollbacker with nearly 15K edits. I'm always interested in tools that can help become a more efficient contributor. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 06:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 08:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Callanecc

I'd like to help with AFT5, I have 4500+ edits and rollback rights and have been helping out on the Feedback Dashboard. Thanks for considering, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 08:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Vivek Rai

Hello. Since reviewer rights are currently being given only for WP:AFT5, I'm not going to be an exception here. I have near 1000 edits with 25+ articles created. I take keen interest in developing articles. Feedback from AFT can help me to add some quality to my work and solve specific problems related to articles. But that doesn't mean that if declined, I shall stop my work. Afterall, I do not do this for profits. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  08:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 Not done because of copyvio concerns. Keilana|Parlez ici 07:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I presume from your comment that I'll have to carry this stain of copy vio concerns for my entire life, although how hard I try to wash it off. Anyways, I shall now forbid myself from any such request from now and believe in working silently for my own satisfaction rather than the show off. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  09:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Jordon (WMF)

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello, community.I have been appointed for Wikimedia foundation recently.So, It would give me a ease of access for handling English Wikipedia if my account is flagged as Reviewer rights.Thanks. Jordon (WMF) (talk) 12:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
See discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

User:TRLIJC19

I would like to receive the user right to use WP:AFT5, and for when PC returns. I have rollback rights, and over 4,000 edits + 4 years between this account and my previous account (TRLIJC18). TRLIJC19 (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

User:LuK3

Been part of the feedback response team and also a rollbacker for a year with 13k edits. Also, since I missed out on PC last time around, I would like to help out with that too. -- Luke (Talk) 02:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Dipankan001

Hello, I'm Dipankan001. I'm active here and have 5000+ edits, and I'm a rollbacker. I also help out sometimes at the Feedback Dashboard. Thanking you, Dipankan. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 07:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

User:David1217

I already am a rollbacker, so I don't want reviewer for the AFTv5 rights. However, I think I would be a useful reviewer for when PC is turned on. I will read the new policy on reviewing once it is written, and I will follow it. David1217 15:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Morning Sunshine

I am a filemover and rollbacker on enwiki and have around 2000 edits which concentrate on reverting vandalism. I'd like to help out with AFT5 for feedback and also pending changes when it comes again Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Evanh2008

I dislike the concept of Pending Changes, personally, but since I'm a frequent RC patroller, I figure I should be involved once it's in place. Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 23:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done. Keilana|Parlez ici 07:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Bmusician

I'm a file mover and rollbacker here on Wikipedia, have 19k contributions and feel I can be trusted with the reviewer right; when Pending Changes returns I'd love to help out! →Bmusician 23:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Hi, while most other users are requesting this because of the AFT5 tool, according to your explanation you are requesting this due to PC; any real reason why you're requesting this now and not when PC would be turned on? Thanks CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 03:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I don't see why I must request this when PC is turned on: I meet the criteria at Wikipedia:REVIEWER#Becoming_a_reviewer. Additionally, I'm interested in helping out with the AFT5 tool. →Bmusician 04:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Agreed, you're trusted and have a clue. I've flagged you. Keilana|Parlez ici 07:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Strike Eagle

I'm a rollbacker with over 3500 edits.I'm primarily involved in anti-vandalism works.I would like to help out when the pending changes go alive.Thanks ≫TheStrike Σagle≪ 15:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Skier Dude (talk) 02:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Gilderien

I am a rollbacker with >7000 edits on this wiki, I am requesting this right mainly for use with the new article-feedback tool, but also with PC when it is switched back on. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 13:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Skier Dude (talk) 02:23, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Vensatry

I am a rollbacker with 19K edits on enwiki. I'd like to review articles especially with AFT5, and also in case when PC comes again. —Vensatry (Ping me) 13:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Skier Dude (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Anir1uph

I patrol many articles and i am interested in diversifying to AFT5. Also I am active in vandal fighting, and hence interested in gaining Reviewer permissions for the upcoming Pending Changes. I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing, i have rollback rights, and made some 4000 edits to en-wikipedia. Anir1uph (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Riley Huntley

Hello, I am interested in helping out with the AFT5 Tool. I am also a rollback and have autopatrolled rights. Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 01:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:TheSpecialUser

Hi! I m autopatrolled here with this account. I m a CLEANSTART of User:Yasht101 who was a rollbacker and autopatrolled. I m much aware of pending changes and as it will be coming back, I'd love to help. I'd also take some time for AFT5 if this rights are useful for it. Thanks! →TSU tp* 01:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
You do not seem to have understood WP:CLEANSTART (admittedly, it is not very clear, and you certainly are being open and honest). I will remind you that it says "If you attempt a clean start, but are recognized, you will be held accountable for your actions under both the old and new accounts". Anyway, that's not entirely relevant here, so I'll leave it up to the reviewing admin to decide your suitability for reviewer rights. Feel free to contact an administrator (privately) if you would prefer your request and my answer to both be revdel'd - I have no objections to that being done. (And you could then resubmit the request without the CLEANSTART-breaking section.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
His connection to his old account was discovered before this. This user I believe can be trusted enough to flagged with reviewer.—cyberpower ChatOnline 02:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
As said by Cyberpower, my account was revealed before this and thus I thought that hiding this won't be a good idea. There is no problem if an admin only considers my contributions with "TheSpecialUser" and then decides to trust me with the rights or not. Thanks! →TSU tp* 03:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done My own review/observations plus Cyberpower678's vouching is good enough for me. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

User:DBigXray

created 60 articles, have 27,000+ edits, also a file mover, rollbacker and Auto patrolled on english wiki. requesting rights for pending changes and AFT5 DBigXray 14:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Titodutta

I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing#Becoming_a_reviewer carefully. I have 12,000+ edits, auto-patrolled, roll-backer, filemover rights Tito Dutta ✉ 22:50, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Vertium

I'm a Rollbacker and active in CVUA, would like to help with the article review process, especially with AFT5 and if/when PC returns. Vertium When all is said and done 23:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 Not done yet. You look like a good editor, but 1000 edits isn't enough for me to go on just yet, especially given only about 2/5ths of them are to article space. Come back after another couple hundred mainspace edits and you should be good to go. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm actually over 1,200 now, but I think the RepLag is probably quite long at the moment. I'll do some more edits over the next few days and come back. Thanks again. Vertium When all is said and done 19:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Shriram

I have read the requirements. I am active in counter vandilism and I am familiar with Biographies of living persons, Neutrality, Verifiability. I have rollbacker rights and I believe I am making a good use of it for wikipedia. I have 4500+ total edits of which 2200+ are main space edits. Requesting for reviewer right. ShriRamTalk tome 19:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Do you even know what this is for? --J (t) 12:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done I'll trust you when you say that you've read those pages, and in a review of your edits I think you'll be okay. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Sahara4u

With more than 50 articles and 4000+ edits, I would like to ask for Review rights. This will help me working against vandalism and conflicts with the BLP policy. ZiaKhan 01:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 Comment: By against vandalism, do you mean hiding entries in AFT5? Or in preparation for the readdition of Pending Changes at some point? Curious. Theopolisme TALK 02:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I mean by both AFT5 and Pending Changes (when returns). ZiaKhan 04:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Seem to know what the tool is and your edits look okay. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Gold Standard

I am interested in helping out with AFT5, and I also am very active in fighting vandalism, so I will be helping out with pending changes when it returns. I have created 52 articles and have around 4000 edits (maybe even more, but I cannot be sure because of replag). I have rollback rights. Gold Standard 04:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Replag is not a big deal when you see your edits from Special:Preferences because it is right from the database. --J (t) 12:49, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done I have seen you around often, and that combined with a review now, leads to me believe that you can be trusted with the tool. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Jenova20

I have 4500+ edits spread over 2 years, create new articles when my project time allows, edit random articles often and fight vandalism when i see it. I'm already a rollbacker too. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 15:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 Question: Do you mean hiding comments on the AFT5 tool to remove vandalism, when saying to fight vandalism?Chip123456 (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Partly, i think it is highly likely some of the comments or threats will become actual vandalism edits and since i like using the current version 4 both myself and by reading the results of pages, i'd want to help address the issues people put forward on version 5, especially if this requires me to remove comments or give out vandalism warnings. The permission would be more of a necessity to me here than something that is not used, although i would hope a lot of people using the box would be more mature and adult in the first place so this wasn't needed. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 16:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt response. An admin will shortly look into this request.--Chip123456 (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jenova20, from what I understand, as you are already a rollbacker you should already be able to work with AFT5 tool. Are you aware that reviewer is also for pending changes, and are you familiar with that process? Thanks. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Fairly familiar, it seems simple enough and it's certainly a needed process for some articles. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 10:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
I've studied it more and would say i'm knowledgable in it now. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 11:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Best day ever. Thanks Zippy, you have a nice day ツ Jenova20 (email) 13:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Babuonwiki

Autopatrolled user, seeking to be a reviewer to fight vandal and have neutral pages on wikipedia BabuOnWiki (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 Question: Do you mean hiding comments on the AFT5 tool to remove vandalism, when saying to fight vandalism?--Chip123456 (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Reply By the way of hiding comments in AFT5, I suppose it is going to remain in the history like other pages in WP. There are chances for the IP to restore back the vandalised comments. So this has to be overthrown. So there needs to be thought for the better way in dealing with the vandal comments in AFT5. --BabuOnWiki (talk) 11:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
So if hidden comments are WP:REVDELETEd, then this may lead to the vandal to irk repeatedly the comments page. So vandalism may continue. --BabuOnWiki (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) - First, you don't fight vandalism with the reviewer right (as of right now), second, the right you are asking for is probably rollback, and I think you're ready for that. --J (t) 12:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I have placed a line through your NAC, give them a chance to reply.--Chip123456 (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Template:Nac is for XfDs, as Wikipedia:Non-admin closure is about them. This shouldn't be closed just yet anyway, even if it is unlikely to be approved, as Chip123456 asked the question less than a day ago and Babuonwiki should be given the time to respond. Acalamari 13:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I think Jeffwang possibly mistook NAC for 'Non-admin comment'.--Chip123456 (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
It was done in good-faith, of course. :) However, Jeffwang did use both the "nac" and "nao" templates while commenting on a few permissions pages, so I think he does know the difference. There's a related discussion on the permissions main talk page. Acalamari 18:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
That's fine :). On the note of replying, I understand with Requests to be confirmed users are given about 6 days to reply.--Chip123456 (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
No, they're given 4 days. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 01:32, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 Not done - User has not given a reason for needing this right (it's not really used for vandalism) and doesn't seem to understand what it's used for. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Ansumang

Hello, I am familiar with WP:Reviewing and its process. I would like to review pending changes as it will become live in couple of months as per rfc 2012 and also at AFT5. Thanks :-) -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 15:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I show some concern about your actions at AFT5. Also, you can already patrol at the Central Feedback Page. However, I fully support your request to use in PC. --J (t) 17:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Vertium

Hi, I requested this a little while ago and the response was that with about 1,000 edits, it wasn't quite enough. I was asked to reapply when I had a couple hundred more edits. I'm now over 2,000 (though there is some replag) and am seeking this perm to assist with AFT5 and in the event that PC returns. I am an instructor on CVUA and spend much of my time on WP in anti-vandalism activities. Many thanks for your time. Vertium When all is said and done 15:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

User:TBrandley

I have read requriements. I have creating 106 articles, and have made over 7,000+ edits in the English Wikipedia, and have expanded tons of articles. I use it to prevent vandalism (already have rollback rights). Thanks, TBrandley 19:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I recommend you file a request to become an autopatrolled user as well. --J (t) 17:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I am curious to know why you were not trusted with with autopatrolled rights last month. Could you please state why and how you have changed since that request? (I understand that they are two separate user rights but they are quite related at the same time) [1] Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 08:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I think it was because some of the articles they created were poor. Not really related.--Chip123456 19:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
I have asked ItsZippy. Our conversation can be seen here--Chip123456 19:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 Not done I am declining the request based on the information in Zippy's archives. Please feel free to re-apply in a few months. -- Dianna (talk) 23:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Mysterytrey

I recently created a few articles, and I wanted to cover more on articles, rather than my average copyedit or whathaveyou. So in that state of mind, I decided to take a look at article feedback on other articles, and I realized just how much kinda-abusive and all around unhelpful feedback there is. I have read the reasons to hide feedback and when to request oversight. Also, since I missed pending changes the last time around, I'd like to help out in Dec. Mysterytrey talk 17:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
It's taking a week or so. Any reason? Also, somone hide this?
YesY Hidden —HueSatLum 18:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 18:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Anderson9990

So i can use the new AFT5 feedback tool and review WP:AFC. Anderson - what's up? If you believe there has been a mistake, report it on my talk page. 20:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Declined per [2]. Hasn't even been 30 days.
Reposting the request after being declined causes me to wonder whether we should be assessing whether to trust with any additional tools. - jc37 04:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
You don't nedd to be a Reviewer to handle AFTv5 feedback. You are a rollbacker and rollbackers may handle feedback as well. Electric Catfish 14:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Electriccatfish2, I suggest reading WP:RVWB, meaning that this user can be granted the right. ⇒TAP 19:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm not disputing if he deserves it or not, I'm just saying that he is a rollbacker and rollbackers can handle AFTv5 feedback without getting the reviewer right. Electric Catfish 23:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 Not done by Jc37 above, clarifying with template CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 01:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Shark96z

I have 5000+ plus live edits since 2007 and already have autopatrolled and rollback rights. I also contribute to vandalism removal often. (mainly when I'm not doing something pertaining to baseball/religion/Georgia/other current events) I believe this tool would assist me in my efforts to fight vandalism, especially with the pending changes feature. Shark96z (talk · contribs) 04:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 13:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Obtund

I really like dealing with vandalism, and helping people with any issues they may have. I copyedit every so often and this would let me do more copyedit on things I could not normally do. Being a reviewer would also help me extend my reach in all of these fields. ObtundTalk 23:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I do not believe that the reviewer tool has much to do with helping users or copy-editing...? CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 01:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Well I also want to edit more articles, and use the pending changes function when it comes back. ObtundTalk 01:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 Not done You do not seem to have a clear idea what this right is, or what you would do with it if awarded. Please re-apply when you have more experience. -- Dianna (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Well how should I get more experience? ObtundTalk 05:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Answered on your talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

User:HueSatLum

I have been editing for over six months, with over 2,000 contribs. I already have rollback rights. I frequently revert vandalism, and (assuming you grant me this right) I would use it for PC when it returns. Thank you. —HueSatLum 00:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done You are doing very good work and can be trusted with this extra permission. -- Dianna (talk) 23:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you —HueSatLum 23:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Hahc21

I would like to participate in the AFTv5 program. Thanks. —Hahc21 19:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Based on your edits, you seem to be good enough for reviewer. Good luck. TBrandley 02:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I left TBrandley a note on their talk regarding not making comments like "looks good", etc - just noting this. Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 05:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Hahc21, as you have rollback rights you should already be able to participate in AFTv5; in this case, I can only grant you the reviewer tool if you have read and understand Wikipedia:Pending changes, as reviewer would be for that if you already have rollback. Thanks. Acalamari 13:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey! I understand Pending changes, as I was aware of the proposal and read it several times. Although it doesn't completely convinces me, the RV would be very handy in case it is stablished in the future. Thanks. —Hahc21 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done Based on response and content work. Acalamari 20:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

User:MathewTownsend

I also have been following AFTv5 would like to participate in the AFTv5 program. Thanks. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done I have awarded rollback and reviewer rights. Use them well, young Jedi :) -- Dianna (talk) 21:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

User:The Illusive Man

I would like to participate in the AFTv5 program. Please and thank you. Cheers mate, The Illusive Man(Contact) 05:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh lord, I am so sorry for whatever in the seven seas caused such a horrific application form error. I am unsure what I did wrong in this one case: I have never encountered a problem such as this. The Illusive Man(Contact) 05:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 Fixed - Don't worry about it. :) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 05:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks mate, I really appreciate the hand! The Illusive Man(Contact) 05:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi The Illusive Man, if you have rollback rights you should already be able to participate in AFTv5; in this case, I can only grant you the reviewer tool if you have read and understand Wikipedia:Pending changes, as reviewer would be for that if you already have rollback. Thanks. Acalamari 13:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • ...Oops. I can tell you I have read and can recite everything there is to know about Pending Changes, but that was not the reason of this application. While I would still like the flag, because Reviewing PC protected pages is I think a staple of the future in anti-vandal efforts, that was not the purpose of this application. So discretion on approval is all yours, mate. Thanks, The Illusive Man(Contact) 15:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I spent a significant amount of time thinking about and researching your request, but ultimately I've decided to mark this as  Not done. I do feel bad about this, as I did like your response and you do appear to be a good editor; however, in cases like this (i.e. you already having rollback) I have to judge on contributions, and as your edits are mainly reverts (which are still good! This isn't a criticism of your work at all.), I have to decline this, unfortunately. I'm really sorry, The Illusive Man. :( Acalamari 20:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 Comment: He states he needs Reviewer rights to use the AFTv5 tool. The Illusive Man is a rollbacker and rollbackers may handle feedback without getting the reviewer right. The only reason for requesting reviewer rights when you are a rollbacker is to edit pages when the Pending Changes trial comes back.--Kindly, Anderson - what's up? 21:50, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
non-admin note to Anderson9990: Acalamari has already declined and this issue has already been brought up by Acalamari. Mysterytrey 22:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

User:M4r51n

Protecting from vandalisamm and stuffs :) M4r51n (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You only have 64 edits... ObtundTalk 17:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
I think another contributions on other wikipedias are making diffrence M4r51n (talk) 19:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 Not done You need English wiki experience and English language skills. We have no way of evaluating your performance in other languages. Please re-apply when you have shown us more of what you can do on this wiki. -- Dianna (talk) 23:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Jeffwang

This isn't about me, this is about my public uses user. I have RV rights and I am currently on vacation/holiday and I'd like User:Username_withheld to receive reviewer rights. Thank you. J (t) 01:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I have felt it necessary to block Jeff and his alt account. The block is in no way related to reviewing and should not impact any future requests for this permission, but for the moment both accounts are blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 Not done as a blocked user. Skier Dude (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Qwerty Binary

I have been a Wikipedian for six years, but haven't been an active editor throughout that duration, mainly due to business in non-virtual reality, and have made a few thousand edits, but none are in and of themselves overwhelmingly significant. From time to time, I revert vandalism, but mostly while making minor edits and/or corrections, among things; in my earlier days, I did considerably more vandalism reversion. If granted reviewer status, I intend on using the permission to better counter vandalism or otherwise unconstructive edits and perhaps to use it for Pending Changes in time, when it is reintroduced. I'm currently a rollbacker for what it's worth, (though I often prefer to do manual reversions because one can always make other changes, or improvements, as well)! Thanks for your consideration and time in advance. Qwerty Binary (talk) 18:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done. Please also consider helping out at WP:AFC and NPP where there are backlogs. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Will do. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Souravmohanty2005

I have been editing on Wikipedia for over an year now. I counter vandalism and make constructive edits. I have a good article to my credit and I am actively involved in improving education related articles on wiki. I also remove copyvio material from these articles. I keep a watch on articles I edit and revert any vandalism or unconstructive edits done. The reviewer status will help me in better counter-vandalism and I will certainly use it for pending changes, once it is reintroduced by the community. Sourav Mohanty (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 14:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Michaelzeng7

Following the 2012 RFC to reinstate WP:Pending changes, I was quick to support it. It is a good idea, despite the number of problems it caused. I counter vandalism, and I know what is vandalism and what is not. I'm sure this tool will benefit Wikipedia greatly as now, anonymous editors can edit protected pages in good faith, rather than be prevented from editing it because of the actions of others. And usually, it's the articles that are visible the highest that are the ones that are protected. I want to be a reviewer for Pending Changes, that is, when and if it is reinstated. Thank you. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 14:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

User:INeverCry

I'm requesting this right so that when pending changes is reinstated I can help review edits to Russia-related articles and literature-related articles primarily, and others when needed. I have 32000 edits, AP and RO rights, and experience with reverting vandalism. Thanks. INeverCry 02:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done Acalamari 14:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Tgeairn

I have been an editor since 2008, and an "active" editor for over a year now. I primarily work with counter vandalism and new editor assistance, using both semi-automated tools (HG,TW,AWB) and manual editing. I am requesting Reviewer rights so that I can continue or escalate my work if Pending Changes is reinstated. Tgeairn (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done The content work you've done in addition to vandal-fighting justifies you having the tool for pending changes. Acalamari 22:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

User:DragonZero

It would be useful to have the ability to sort feedbacks given by readers. Nothing else to add. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done :). Ironholds (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Basalisk

I've been editing actively for close to a year now, and in that time I think I have shown myself to be trustworthy and a safe pair of hands. I do a fair bit of new page patrolling and I'd like to help out reviewing pending changes when the system is reinstated. I don't have buckets of anti-vandalism experience but I have patrolled the recent changes feed on occasion, and have a handful of edits to AIV. I have a good working knowledge of basic policies and guidelines. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 22:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Nathan2055

As a rollbacker, I would like to get started reviewing AFT feedback. Thanks in advance! Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 Not done as a rollbacker you can already hide feedback, and no privileges are required to review feedback. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 Comment: As said below, this has been given to rollbackers previously, so why am I not allowed to have this right? Besides, I also plan to do PC stuff, as there is only a few months before that returns. --Nathan2055talk - contribs 02:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The idea is to have the bits that you need. Rollbackers do not need this for hiding feedback. It makes it just hat collecting. However if you you are going to patrol pending changes that is a different story that could justify having the bit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Thine Antique Pen

I am requesting the Reviewer userright because I wish to participate in the Article Feedback Tool program. This request has been OK'd by User:Worm That Turned in this conversation, per this agreement. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Kudpung! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Mdann52

I already help with edit requests, and I feel I can help out with this as well. I am experienced in recognising vandalism, and am willing to take on this additional role Mdann52 (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mdann52, most of your edits are vandal reverts. I have a couple of questions: have you read and understand the criteria for becoming a reviewer, and do you know that as a rollbacker you can already handle AFT5? Thanks. Acalamari 22:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I am happy with the reviewers role, but wasn't aware I could do it just using rollback. Thanks for telling me, Mdann52 (talk) 04:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

I also wanted this right to help with pending changes as well . Mdann52 (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done for this response and content work. Acalamari 14:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Mrt3366

Firstly, I am familiar with the stricter definition of blatant vandalism. I am aware of the fact that all disruptive/unhelpful edits are not regarded as vandalism. I am also closely acquainted with WP:NOR, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:NOT etc. These were the reasons why I believe I am eligible for the permission. Although I may not be better than the most, I can certainly promise you this, I will not misuse the right/permission ever.

The reason why I want to be a reviewer is to help the community by weeding out obvious vandalism and by reviewing the pending changes. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 13:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done for your rationale and content work. Acalamari 14:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Clegs

I am curently active on WP primarily as an anti-vandalism patrol/wikignome. In the past I have worked on articles and reviewed FPCs, but haven't had the interest recently. In preparation for the upcoming re-trial of Pending Changes, I'd like to request permission as a reviewer 1) so that I will be able to help with the approval backlog that some are expecting and 2) so that my gnoming on PC pages won't add to the backlog for others to approve. Clegs (engage in rational discourse) 03:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done for pending changes, and because of your content work. Acalamari 14:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

User:TheGeneralUser

I am a regular editor and contributor to English Wikipedia for over a year now. I already had the reviewer right which i had got a few months ago in March as per request on the Help desk (See my user rights log) because this page was inactive at that time. Today i just recently contacted User:Wehwalt about removing my reviewer right so that i can post my request here and let another Administrator grant it to me which would be both fair and legitimate as i believe in doing the right thing. I have hold the reviewer rights for many months and have worked on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Testing quite well and i know all the policies and guidelines like Wikipedia:Reviewing, Wikipedia:Pending changes and Wikipedia:Article Feedback Tool and also other related ones. You can see the other user rights, Rollback and File Mover which i hold and have done many good and useful contributions using these tools including Reviewer and i have never abused anything. I am very careful when doing all kinds of work on Wikipedia and these tools will help me further in improving Wikipedia. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 12:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done As far as I'm aware there wasn't any problem with how you obtained the right before, and based on my observations of you I think you'd be fine with this tool for pending changes. Acalamari 14:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your trust and confidence in me Acalamari! :-). TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Anderson

To be able to edit when the Pending changes trial returns.. Anderson - What's up? 23:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 Not done. You need more experience, and the level of experience that will be required for reviewers is still under discussion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I'll wait and see what the outcome is at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions.--Anderson (Public) (talk) 03:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

User:I Jethrobot

My reputation as an editor is mostly spread out across participating (and doing some non-admin closures) of deletion discussions, patrolling recent changes and new users page for vandalism, and participating in some of the new feedback program such as New editor feedback, and Article feedback. My participation in deletion discussions and designating speedy deletion/proposed deletions has helped me familiarize with differentiating between vandalism, copyright infringement, personal attacks, good-faith mistakes, and content that needs to be cleaned up. They have also helped me appreciate the importance of neutrality, the verifiability of claims, WP:NOT, and original research being out of place on this project. I am also a rollbacker, and have tried to use this thoughtfully. I generally prefer to leave an edit summary rather than simply rollback edits as it is more helpful to other editors reviewing my work. I request reviewer permissions to help out with pending changes, should they be reintroduced. I have also checked out the testing pages to see how the reviewer permission work and how they change the history and editing pages for articles. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 10:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

User:TBrandley

I would like to have reviewer rights to check pending changes to see if they should be accepted or reverted. I already have rollback, and have made over 12,600 contributions to the English Wikipedia. TBrandley 23:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) TBrandley was denied of reviewer rights by Diannaa on August 6, who recommended he reapply in a few months. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 Not done. Concurring with Diannaa. A few months is not the same as a few weeks. It would also have demonstrated good faith if you had added something like: 'An earlier application was rejected 6 weeks ago with the suggestion that I apply again in a few months, but I feel I'm ready now to be reconsidered' , to your request. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Floating Boat

Most times I'm on I revert vandalism, and should Pending Changes come back I believe I can reliably judge between a constructive and vandalistic edit. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 10:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 Comment: it's likely that PC will be delayed until the decision is made how much experience is needed to be a reviewer.--Anderson - What's up? 05:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Ah, that's fine. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 07:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Currently, the draft policy states that it should be given in a similar level of confidence as Rollback. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Emphasis on draft. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 Done I think this user is trustworthy. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Adam mugliston

I have been on Wikipedia for 4 years now and have over 6,000 edits. Recently I have been working with new users and so I can understand their unintentional mistakes and can distinguish them from true vandalism well. I have been fighting vandalism before and have done well.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  15:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You are already a rollbacker, so you already have access to monitoring the AFTv5. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
I feel no need of accessing AFT.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  07:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 Not done Per the astoundingly poor judgment here and especially here. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Oh so you never make mistakes?  Adam Mugliston  Talk  20:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
I have never deliberately vandalized a userpage. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Northamerica1000

I'm an experienced Wikipedia editor, have made significant contributions to the encyclopedia and I'm very familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including (but not limited to) Biographies of living persons, vandalism, copyrighted work, plagiarism, patent nonsense, personal attacks, libel and legal threats. I have a firm comprehension of the English language, writing, writing styles (e.g. The MLA Style Manual), citation styles (on Wikipedia and in academia such as parenthetical referencing) and empirical research. I am also experienced in removing vandalism on Wikipedia, both manually and using Wikipedia:STiki.
From the recent RFC about pending changes, it appears that Pending changes will come back into fruition on Wikipedia, and I'd like to contribute to the encyclopedia at places such as Special:PendingChanges when it does. Thank you for your consideration regarding my request for Wikipedia reviewer permission. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 Obvious done. For someone of your caliber, with more edits than most admins, you don't need to give a big discussion. ;) Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Northamerica1000(talk) 20:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Stephenwanjau

I would like to help with moderation of the AFT tool comments that are left by users. By removing vandal comments or comments that do not appraise purpose of AFT.An example that can be found in the page here ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 19:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You are a rollbacker, so you can already monitor feedback at AFTv5. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment)  Question: Is another reason you want this right is to edit with the return of the pending changes trial?--Anderson (Public) (talk) 22:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment)Sorry for not responding to this the soonest possible. I was not aware that with the Rollbacker rights I can monitor comments AFTv5. There is no other reason as to why I had put up this request. Having said that I think this request can now be archived. Thank you everyone. ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 05:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 Not done per above, request withdrawn. Request will be archived in 2 days. --Mysterytrey 22:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

User:S Marshall

I already have reviewer rights; please remove them. Thanks —S Marshall T/C 19:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 Removed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Archive_13&oldid=1190234576"