The Beatles (album): Difference between revisions
→Critical reception: added quote from Rolling Stone review |
no score/rating in the review, expanded quote, formatted citation |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
| rev6 = [[PopMatters]] |
| rev6 = [[PopMatters]] |
||
| rev6Score = 9/10<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/beatles-whitealbum |title=The Beatles: White Album |author=Zupko, Sarah |work=[[PopMatters]]|accessdate=19 May 2010}}</ref> |
| rev6Score = 9/10<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/beatles-whitealbum |title=The Beatles: White Album |author=Zupko, Sarah |work=[[PopMatters]]|accessdate=19 May 2010}}</ref> |
||
| rev7 = ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' |
| rev7 = ''[[The Rolling Stone Record Guide]]'' |
||
| rev7Score = |
| rev7Score = {{Rating|5|5}}<ref>[[Dave Marsh|Marsh, Dave]]; Swenson, John (Editors). ''The Rolling Stone Record Guide'', 1st edition, Random House/Rolling Stone Press, 1979, p. 27.</ref> |
||
| rev8 |
| rev8 = [[Slant Magazine]] |
||
⚫ | |||
| rev8Score = {{Rating|5|5}}<ref>[[Dave Marsh|Marsh, Dave]]; Swenson, John (Editors). ''The Rolling Stone Record Guide'', 1st edition, Random House/Rolling Stone Press, 1979, p. 27.</ref> |
|||
| rev9 = [[Slant Magazine]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
Upon its release in November 1968, ''The Beatles'' received mixed reviews from [[music journalism|music critics]],{{sfn|Emerick|Massey|2007|p=264}} most of whom viewed its mild, playful satire as unimportant and conservative.{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|p=149}} [[Nik Cohn]], writing in ''[[The New York Times]]'', considered the album "boring beyond belief" and described "more than half the songs" as "profound mediocrities."<ref>{{cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nik |authorlink=Nik Cohn |title=A Briton Blasts The Beatles |work=The New York Times |date=15 December 1968}}</ref> [[Robert Christgau]] of ''[[The Village Voice]]'' said that it is "their most consistent and probably their worst", and referred to its songs as a "[[wikt:pastiche#Noun|pastiche]] of musical exercises".<ref>{{cite news|last=Christgau|first=Robert|authorlink=Robert Christgau|month=September|year=1971|url=http://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/bk-aow/beatles.php|title=Living Without the Beatles|newspaper=[[The Village Voice]]|location=New York|accessdate=1 February 2013}}</ref> Critics also complained about a lack of unity among the songs and criticized the Beatles for using eclecticism and pastiche as a means of avoiding important issues during a turbulent political and social climate.{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|pp=147–9}} [[Jon Landau]], writing for the ''[[The Times|London Daily Times]]'', argued that the band uses parody because they are "afraid of confronting reality" and "the urgencies of the moment".{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|p=149}} |
Upon its release in November 1968, ''The Beatles'' received mixed reviews from [[music journalism|music critics]],{{sfn|Emerick|Massey|2007|p=264}} most of whom viewed its mild, playful satire as unimportant and conservative.{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|p=149}} [[Nik Cohn]], writing in ''[[The New York Times]]'', considered the album "boring beyond belief" and described "more than half the songs" as "profound mediocrities."<ref>{{cite news |last=Cohn |first=Nik |authorlink=Nik Cohn |title=A Briton Blasts The Beatles |work=The New York Times |date=15 December 1968}}</ref> [[Robert Christgau]] of ''[[The Village Voice]]'' said that it is "their most consistent and probably their worst", and referred to its songs as a "[[wikt:pastiche#Noun|pastiche]] of musical exercises".<ref>{{cite news|last=Christgau|first=Robert|authorlink=Robert Christgau|month=September|year=1971|url=http://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/bk-aow/beatles.php|title=Living Without the Beatles|newspaper=[[The Village Voice]]|location=New York|accessdate=1 February 2013}}</ref> Critics also complained about a lack of unity among the songs and criticized the Beatles for using eclecticism and pastiche as a means of avoiding important issues during a turbulent political and social climate.{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|pp=147–9}} [[Jon Landau]], writing for the ''[[The Times|London Daily Times]]'', argued that the band uses parody because they are "afraid of confronting reality" and "the urgencies of the moment".{{sfn|Womack|Davis|2006|p=149}} |
||
In a positive review, [[Tony Palmer]] of ''[[The Observer]]'' claimed that, "if there is still any doubt that Lennon and McCartney are the greatest songwriters since [[Franz Schubert|Schubert]]," the album "should surely see the last vestiges of cultural snobbery and [[bourgeois]] prejudice swept away in a deluge of joyful music making".<ref>{{cite book | first=Phillip | last=Norman | title=Shout! |publisher=Fireside Press |year=1981}}</ref> [[Richard Goldstein (writer born 1942)|Richard Goldstein]] of ''The New York Times'' called the album a "major success"<ref>{{cite news |last=Goldstein |first=Richard |work=The New York Times |date=8 December 1968}} |
In a positive review, [[Tony Palmer]] of ''[[The Observer]]'' claimed that, "if there is still any doubt that Lennon and McCartney are the greatest songwriters since [[Franz Schubert|Schubert]]," the album "should surely see the last vestiges of cultural snobbery and [[bourgeois]] prejudice swept away in a deluge of joyful music making".<ref>{{cite book | first=Phillip | last=Norman | title=Shout! |publisher=Fireside Press |year=1981}}</ref> [[Richard Goldstein (writer born 1942)|Richard Goldstein]] of ''The New York Times'' called the album a "major success."<ref>{{cite news |last=Goldstein |first=Richard |work=The New York Times |date=8 December 1968}}</ref> Alan Smith of ''[[NME]]'' derided "Revolution #9" as a "pretentious" example of "idiot immaturity", but assigned the benediction "God Bless You, Beatles!" to "most of the rest" of the album.<ref>{{cite news |work=New Musical Express |title=The Brilliant, the Bad, and the Ugly |location=UK |date=9 November 1968 |last=Smith |first=Alan}}</ref> [[Jann Wenner]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' called it "the best album they have ever released" and asserted that the band are allowed to appropriate other styles because their ability and identity are "so strong that they make it uniquely theirs, and uniquely the Beatles. They are so good that they not only expand the idiom, but they are also able to penetrate it and take it further."<ref>{{cite journal|author=[[Jann Wenner|Wenner, Jann]]|date=21 December 1968|title=Review: The Beatles|journal=[[Rolling Stone]]|location=New York|page=10}}</ref> |
||
''The Beatles'' has since been regarded as one of the best albums of all time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3998301.stm|title=Beatles classic voted worst song|publisher=[[BBC News]]|accessdate=1 April 2013|date=10 November 2004}}</ref> In 2003, '' |
''The Beatles'' has since been regarded as one of the best albums of all time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3998301.stm|title=Beatles classic voted worst song|publisher=[[BBC News]]|accessdate=1 April 2013|date=10 November 2004}}</ref> In 2003, ''Rolling Stone'' ranked it number 10 on its list of [[500 Greatest Albums of All Time|the 500 greatest albums of all time]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-20120531/the-beatles-the-white-album-20120524 |title=500 Greatest Albums of All Time: The Beatles, 'The White Album' |work=Rolling Stone |accessdate=17 January 2013}}</ref> In a retrospective review, Neil McCormick of ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' also viewed the album as one of the greatest and found it "so eccentric and interesting" that "even its sketchiest oddities somehow gain power amidst the cornucopia of ideas and performances."<ref name="McCormick"/> [[Allmusic]] editor [[Stephen Thomas Erlewine]] also felt that the album is interesting for "its mess" and wrote that each song is an "entity to itself, as the band touches on anything and everything they can", which "makes for a frustratingly scattershot record or a singularly gripping musical experience, depending on your view".<ref name="erlewine">{{cite web |publisher=Allmusic |accessdate=24 December 2009 |url={{Allmusic|class=album|id=r1523/review|pure_url=yes}} |title=Review of ''The Beatles'' <nowiki>[White Album]</nowiki> |last=Erlewine |first=Stephen Thomas }}</ref> In ''[[The New Rolling Stone Album Guide]]'' (2004), [[Rob Sheffield]] gave the album five stars and said that, despite "loads of self-indulgent [[filler (media)|filler]]", listeners often pick different highlights, which is "part of the fun".<ref name="RSguide">{{cite book |title=The New Rolling Stone Album Guide |first=Nathan |last=Brackett |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2004}}</ref> [[Slant Magazine]]'s Eric Henderson claimed that ''The Beatles'' remains one of the band's few albums that "resists reflexive canonisation, which, along with society's continued fragmentation, keeps the album fresh and surprising."<ref name="slant">{{cite web |url=http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=477 |work=Slant Magazine |title=The Beatles (The White Album) |first=Eric |last=Henderson |date=2 August 2004 |accessdate=24 December 2009}}</ref> |
||
==Cultural responses== |
==Cultural responses== |
Revision as of 17:25, 2 April 2013
Untitled | |
---|---|
The Beatles is the ninth official album by English rock group the Beatles, a double album released in 1968. It is also commonly known as "The White Album", as it has no graphics or text other than the band's name embossed (and, on the early LP and CD releases, a serial number) on its plain white sleeve.
The album was written and recorded during a period of turmoil for the group, after visiting the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in India and having a particularly productive songwriting session in early 1968. Returning to the studio, the group recorded from May to October 1968, only to have conflict and dissent drive the group members apart. Ringo Starr quit the band for a brief time, leaving Paul McCartney to play drums on two tracks. Many of the songs were "solo" recordings, or at least by less than the full group, as each individual member began to explore his own talent.
Upon its release in November 1968, the album received mixed reviews from music critics, who criticized its satirical songs as unimportant and apolitical amid a turbulent political and social climate. However, it reached number 1 on the charts in both the United Kingdom and the United States. The album has sold over 30 million copies worldwide and has since been viewed by critics as one of the greatest albums of all time.
Background
The Beatles were at the peak of their global influence and visibility in late 1968. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, released the previous year, had enjoyed a combination of commercial success, critical acclaim, and immense cultural influence that had previously seemed inconceivable for a pop release. Time, for instance, had written in 1967 that Sgt. Pepper's constituted a "historic departure in the progress of music—any music,"[3] while Timothy Leary, in a widely quoted assessment of the same period, declared that the band were prototypes of "evolutionary agents sent by God, endowed with mysterious powers to create a new human species."[4] The Beatles was the first album that the group undertook following the death of their manager, Brian Epstein, and the first released by their own record label, Apple.
Most of the songs were conceived during a transcendental meditation course with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in Rishikesh, India in the spring of 1968. The retreat had required long periods of meditation, initially conceived by the band as a spiritual respite from all worldly endeavours—a chance, in John Lennon's words, to "get away from everything."[5] Both Lennon and Paul McCartney had quickly found themselves in songwriting mode, however, often meeting "clandestinely in the afternoons in each other's rooms"[6] to review the new work. "Regardless of what I was supposed to be doing," Lennon would later recall, "I did write some of my best songs there."[7] Close to forty new compositions had emerged in Rishikesh, twenty-three of which would be recorded in very rough form at Kinfauns, George Harrison's home in Esher, in May 1968.
The Beatles had left Rishikesh before the end of the course, with Starr and then McCartney departing, and Lennon and Harrison departing together later. According to some reports, Lennon left Rishikesh because he felt personally betrayed by rumours that Maharishi had made sexual advances toward Mia Farrow[8][9], who had accompanied The Beatles on their trip. Shortly after he decided to leave, Lennon wrote a song called "Maharishi" which included the lyrics, "Maharishi/You little twat"; the song became "Sexy Sadie". According to several authors, Alexis Mardas (aka "Magic Alex") deliberately engineered these rumours because he was bent on undermining the Maharishi's influence over each Beatle.[10][11][12] In a 1980 interview, Lennon acknowledged that the Maharishi was the inspiration for the song: "I just called him 'Sexy Sadie'."[13]
The album's working title, A Doll's House, was changed when the English progressive rock band Family released the similarly titled Music in a Doll's House earlier that year.
Recording sessions
The Beatles was recorded between 30 May 1968 and 14 October 1968, largely at Abbey Road Studios, with some sessions at Trident Studios. Although productive, the sessions were reportedly undisciplined and sometimes fractious, and they took place at a time when tensions were growing within the group.[14] Concurrent with the recording of this album, the Beatles were launching their new multimedia business corporation Apple Corps, an enterprise that proved to be a source of significant stress for the band.[citation needed]
The sessions for The Beatles marked the first appearance in the studio of Lennon's new girlfriend and artistic partner, Yoko Ono, who would thereafter be a more or less constant presence at all Beatles sessions.[15] Prior to Ono's appearance on the scene, the individual Beatles had been very insular during recording sessions, with influence from outsiders strictly limited. McCartney's girlfriend at the time, Francie Schwartz, was also present at some of the recording sessions, as were Pattie Harrison and Maureen Starkey, the other two Beatles' wives.[16]
Author Mark Lewisohn reports that the Beatles held their first and only 24-hour recording/producing session near the end of the creation of The Beatles, which occurred during the final mixing and sequencing for the album. The session was attended by Lennon, McCartney, and producer George Martin.[17]
Division and discord in the studio
Despite the album's official title, which emphasised group identity, studio efforts on The Beatles captured the work of four increasingly individualised artists who frequently found themselves at odds.[17] The band's work pattern changed dramatically with this project, and by most accounts the extraordinary synergy of the Beatles' previous studio sessions was harder to come by during this period. Sometimes McCartney would record in one studio for prolonged periods of time, while Lennon would record in another, each man using different engineers.[17] At one point in the sessions, George Martin, whose authority over the band in the studio had waned, spontaneously left to go on holiday, leaving Chris Thomas in charge of producing.[18] During one of these sessions, while recording "Helter Skelter", Harrison reportedly ran around the studio while holding a flaming ashtray above his head, "doing an Arthur Brown."[17]
Long after the recording of The Beatles was complete, Martin mentioned in interviews that his working relationship with the Beatles changed during this period, and that many of the band's efforts seemed unfocused, often yielding prolonged jam sessions that sounded uninspired.[14] On 16 July recording engineer Geoff Emerick, who had worked with the group since Revolver, announced that he was no longer willing to work with them.[17]
The sudden departures were not limited to EMI personnel. On 22 August, Starr abruptly left the studio, explaining later that he felt that his role was minimised compared to that of the other members, and that he was tired of waiting through the long and contentious recording sessions.[14] Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison pleaded with Starr to return, and after two weeks he did. Upon Starr's return, he found his drum kit decorated with red, white, and blue flowers, a welcome-back gesture from Harrison.[14] The reconciliation was, however, only temporary, and Starr's exit served as a precursor of future "months and years of misery", in Starr's words.[14] Indeed, after The Beatles was completed, both Harrison and Lennon would stage similar unpublicised departures from the band.[14] McCartney's public departure in 1970 would mark the formal end of the band's ensemble. He described the sessions for The Beatles as a turning point for the group. Up to this point, he observed, "The world was a problem, but we weren't. You know, that was the best thing about the Beatles, until we started to break up, like during the White Album and stuff. Even the studio got a bit tense then."[14]
Instrumental contributions
According to Lewisohn, McCartney played drums on "Dear Prudence" because Starr had left the group while the song was being recorded.[17] Lewisohn also reports that, in the case of "Back in the U.S.S.R.", also recorded during Starr's absence, the three remaining Beatles each made contributions on bass and drums, with the result that those parts may be composite tracks played by Lennon, McCartney and/or Harrison.
Other musicians
Though not formally credited on the album, Eric Clapton played lead guitar on Harrison's "While My Guitar Gently Weeps".[19] Harrison explains in The Beatles Anthology that Clapton's presence temporarily alleviated the studio tension and that all band members were on their best behaviour during his time with the band in the studio.[14] Harrison, who had invited Clapton to the sessions, soon reciprocated by collaborating with Clapton on the song "Badge" for Cream's last album Goodbye. Harrison, too, was not formally credited at first, but was identified as "L'Angelo Misterioso" on the cover.
Clapton was not the only outside musician to sit in on the sessions. Nicky Hopkins provided electric piano for the single cut of "Revolution" (recorded during these sessions. Several horns were also recorded on the album version of "Revolution 1". "Savoy Truffle" also features the horn section. Jack Fallon played a bluegrass fiddle on "Don't Pass Me By",[20] and a team of orchestral players and background singers appeared on "Good Night" (which was Beatle-free except for Starr's vocal).
Technical advances
The sessions for The Beatles were notable for the band's formal transition from 4-track to 8-track recording. As work on the album began, Abbey Road Studios possessed, but had yet to install, an 8-track machine that had supposedly been sitting in a storage room for months. This was in accordance with EMI's policy of testing and customising new gear, sometimes for months, before putting it into use in the studios. The Beatles recorded "Hey Jude" and "Dear Prudence" at Trident Studios in central London, which had an 8-track recorder.[17] When they learned about EMI's 8-track recorder, they insisted on using it, and engineers Ken Scott and Dave Harries took the machine (without authorisation from the studio chiefs) into the Number 2 recording studio at Abbey Road for the band's use.[17]
Songs
Although most of the songs on any given Beatles album are usually credited to the Lennon–McCartney songwriting team, that description is often misleading, and rarely more so than on The Beatles. With this album, each of the four band members began to showcase the range and depth of his individual songwriting talents, and to display styles that would be carried over to his eventual solo career. Indeed, some songs that the individual Beatles were working on during this period eventually were released on solo albums. According to the bootlegged album of the songs recorded at Kinfauns, George Harrison's Esher home, these include Lennon's "Look at Me" and "Child of Nature", eventually reworked as "Jealous Guy"; McCartney's "Junk" and "Teddy Boy"; and Harrison's "Not Guilty" and "Circles."[21][22]
Many of the songs on the album display experimentation with unlikely musical genres, borrowing directly from such sources as 1930s dance-hall music (in "Honey Pie"), classical chamber music (in "Piggies"), the avant-garde sensibilities of Yoko Ono and John Cage (in "Revolution 9"), country-style music (Ringo Starr's "Don't Pass Me By"), a western-style saloon ballad ("Rocky Raccoon"), and the lush sentimentality of Henry Mancini's film scores (in "Good Night"). Such diversity was largely unprecedented in global pop music in 1968, and the album’s sprawling approach provoked (and continues to provoke) both praise and criticism from observers.[1] "Revolution 9", in particular, a densely layered eight-minute-and-thirteen-second sound collage, has attracted both interest and disapproval from fans and music critics over the years.
The only western instrument available to the group during their Indian visit was the acoustic guitar, and thus most of the songs on The Beatles were written and first performed on that instrument.[citation needed] Some of these songs remained acoustic on The Beatles (notably "Rocky Raccoon", "Blackbird", "Julia", "Cry Baby Cry", "I Will" and "Mother Nature's Son") and were recorded in the studio either solo, or by only part of the group.
Compositions not included
A number of songs were recorded during these sessions but were not issued on The Beatles, including Harrison's "Not Guilty" (which he re-recorded for his eponymous 1979 album, George Harrison), Lennon's "What's the New Mary Jane", and McCartney's "Jubilee" (later retitled "Junk" and released on his first solo LP).[23]
Others included "Mean Mr. Mustard" and "Polythene Pam" (both of which would be used for the medley on Abbey Road); "Child of Nature" (recorded with drastically different lyrics as "Jealous Guy" for Lennon's Imagine); "Etcetera" (a McCartney composition); "The Long and Winding Road" (completed in 1969 for the Let It Be LP); "Something" (which ended up on Abbey Road); and "Sour Milk Sea" (which Harrison gave to friend and Apple artist Jackie Lomax for his first LP, Is This What You Want).[citation needed]
Other songs recorded for, but ultimately left off The Beatles received significant exposure via bootlegs, notably Harrison's "Circles" (which he eventually re-recorded as a solo track and released on his 1982 album, Gone Troppo) and "Not Guilty" (which he also eventually re-recorded as a solo track for his 1978 album George Harrison), and Lennon's manic "What's the New Mary Jane".[citation needed] More recently, the song "Revolution 1 (Take 20)", a previously unknown track, surfaced in 2009 on a bootleg and is supposed to connect "Revolution 1" and the avant-garde "Revolution 9" (both of which appeared on The Beatles) in an attempt by Lennon to record one long version of "Revolution" before ultimately splitting the two songs up.[24]
The White Album session versions of "Not Guilty" and "What's the New Mary Jane", and a demo of "Junk", were ultimately released on the Beatles Anthology 3 album in 1996.
Singles
Although "Hey Jude" was not intended to be included on any LP release, it was recorded during the White Album sessions and was issued as a single nearly three months before the release of The Beatles. "Hey Jude's" B-side, "Revolution", was an alternate version of the album's "Revolution 1". Lennon had wanted the original version of "Revolution" to be released as a single, but the other three Beatles objected on the grounds that it was too slow.[14] A new, faster version, with heavily distorted guitar and a high-energy keyboard solo from Nicky Hopkins, was recorded, and was relegated to the flip side of "Hey Jude". The resulting release – "Hey Jude" on side A and "Revolution" on side B – emerged as the first release on The Beatles' new Apple Records label.[23] It went on to be The Beatles' most successful single, with world sales over 5 million by the end of 1968 and 7.5 million by October 1972.[23] No singles were taken from The Beatles in either Britain or America, but "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" backed with "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", both from the album, became a double-sided smash in Australia, spending five weeks at Number One in the beginning of 1969.[citation needed]
Editing concerns and release
The Beatles was the first Beatles album released by Apple Records, as well as their only original double album. Producer George Martin has said that he was against the idea of a double album at the time and suggested to the group that they reduce the number of songs in order to form a single album featuring their stronger work, but that the band decided against this.[25] Interviewed for the Beatles Anthology, Starr said that he now felt that it should have been released as two separate albums (that he appropriately named The White Album and The Whiter Album). Harrison felt on reflection that some of the tracks could have been released as B-sides, but "there was a lot of ego in that band." He also supported the idea of the double album, to clear out the backlog of songs that the group had at the time. McCartney, by contrast, said that it was fine as it was ("It's great. It sold. It's the bloody Beatles White Album. Shut up."), and that its wide variety of songs was a major part of the album's appeal.[26] The Beatles was released on 22 November 1968.
Mono version
The Beatles was the last Beatles album to be released with a unique, alternative mono mix, albeit one issued only in the UK and a few other countries. Twenty-eight of the album's 30 tracks ("Revolution 1" and "Revolution 9" being the only exceptions) exist in official alternative mono mixes. Several of these mono mixes are quite different from the stereo versions. Perhaps most notably, the mono mix/edit of "Helter Skelter" eliminates the fade-in at the end of the song (and Ringo Starr's ending scream "I've got blisters on my fingers!"), and the mono mix of "Yer Blues" has a longer fadeout than its stereo counterpart.
Beatles albums after The Beatles (except Yellow Submarine in the UK) occasionally had mono pressings in certain countries (such as Brazil), but these editions—Yellow Submarine, Abbey Road and Let It Be—were in each case mono fold-downs from the regular stereo mixes.
In the US, mono records were already being phased out; the US release of The Beatles was the first Beatles LP to be issued in stereo only.
The mono version of The Beatles was made available worldwide on 9 September 2009, as part of the Beatles in Mono CD box set.
Packaging and tape configurations
The album's sleeve was designed by Richard Hamilton, a notable pop artist who had organised a Marcel Duchamp retrospective at the Tate Gallery the previous year. Hamilton's design was in stark contrast to Peter Blake's vivid cover art for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, and consisted of a plain white sleeve. The band's name was discreetly embossed slightly below the middle of the album's right side, and the cover also featured a unique stamped serial number, "to create," in Hamilton's words, "the ironic situation of a numbered edition of something like five million copies."[citation needed] Indeed, the artist intended the cover to resemble the "look" of conceptual art, an emerging movement in contemporary art at the time. Later vinyl record releases in the US showed the title in grey printed (rather than embossed) letters. Early copies on compact disc were also numbered. Later CD releases rendered the album's title in black or grey. The 30th anniversary CD release was done to look like the original album sleeve, with an embossed title and serial number, including a small reproduction of the poster and pictures (see re-issues).
The album's inside packaging included a poster, the lyrics to the songs, and a set of photographs taken by John Kelly[27] during the autumn of 1968 that have themselves become iconic. This is the only sleeve of a Beatles studio album not to show the members of the band on the front.
LP packaging varied somewhat by territory. Original copies of the LP released in New Zealand, for example, opened from the top rather than the right side, and were numbered starting at 10,000. (Later pressings opened conventionally from the right side, and did not bear a unique number.) Some South American editions did not feature the Kelly photographs in the gatefold, instead including uncredited performance photographs of the band from circa 1964-65 (the Beatles are clean-shaven and wearing matching suits in the photos, as Brian Epstein insisted they do in performance during this period).
Tape versions of the album did not feature a white cover. Instead, cassette and 8-track versions (issued on two cassettes/cartridges in early 1969) contained cover artwork that featured high contrast black and white (with no grey) versions of the four Kelly photographs.[28] In both the cassette and 8-track versions of the album, the two tapes were sold in a black slip-cover box that bore the title, "The Beatles", and the outline of an apple, embossed in gold.[29] This departure from the LP's design not only made it difficult for less-informed fans to identify the tape in record stores, but it also led some fans at the time to jokingly refer to the 8-track or cassette not as the "white album" but as the "black tape." In 1988, Capitol/EMI re-issued the 2-cassette version of the album, still with the same cover artwork as the original cassettes, but without the black slip-cover box. The mid-1990s Canadian Apple/Capitol version of the 2 cassette set (C4-46443A/B) does have the appropriate plain white inlay cards with "The Beatles" Part 1/Part 2 lettering across the bottom of the inlay.
Capitol/EMI initially issued reel-to-reel editions of The Beatles as well. These also used the black-and-white Kelly portraits as cover art, and were available in two configurations: as two separate volumes similar to the cassette and 8-track editions, and as a single twin-pack tape. Capitol/EMI ceased manufacturing of pre-recorded reel tapes in North America in late 1969, and subsequently licensed the album (along with several other Beatles recordings) to Ampex for reel-to-reel distribution. The Ampex reel-to-reel tape version of The Beatles, released in early 1970 (in two separate volumes, and again using the Kelly cover artwork), is particularly noteworthy in that it features eight tracks in edited form: "Dear Prudence", "Glass Onion", "Don't Pass Me By", "Why Don't We Do It In The Road?". "Yer Blues", "Helter Skelter", "Cry Baby Cry" and "Revolution 9". These are unique to the album's Ampex reel-to-reel version, and have not been issued since.
In the autumn of 1978, the album’s tenth anniversary, EMI reissued the album as a two-record set pressed on white vinyl in limited quantities of only 150,000 copies. In 1981, Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab (MFSL) issued a unique half-speed master variation of the album utilising the sound from the original master recording. The discs were pressed on high-quality virgin vinyl.
A painting of the band by "Patrick" (John Byrne) was at an earlier point under consideration to be used as the album's cover. The piece was later used for the sleeve of the compilation album The Beatles' Ballads, released in 1980.
Critical reception
Review scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
Allmusic | [1] |
Blender | [30] |
The Daily Telegraph | [31] |
Encyclopedia of Popular Music | [32] |
Pitchfork Media | 10/10[33] |
PopMatters | 9/10[34] |
The Rolling Stone Record Guide | [35] |
Slant Magazine | [36] |
Upon its release in November 1968, The Beatles received mixed reviews from music critics,[37] most of whom viewed its mild, playful satire as unimportant and conservative.[38] Nik Cohn, writing in The New York Times, considered the album "boring beyond belief" and described "more than half the songs" as "profound mediocrities."[39] Robert Christgau of The Village Voice said that it is "their most consistent and probably their worst", and referred to its songs as a "pastiche of musical exercises".[40] Critics also complained about a lack of unity among the songs and criticized the Beatles for using eclecticism and pastiche as a means of avoiding important issues during a turbulent political and social climate.[41] Jon Landau, writing for the London Daily Times, argued that the band uses parody because they are "afraid of confronting reality" and "the urgencies of the moment".[38]
In a positive review, Tony Palmer of The Observer claimed that, "if there is still any doubt that Lennon and McCartney are the greatest songwriters since Schubert," the album "should surely see the last vestiges of cultural snobbery and bourgeois prejudice swept away in a deluge of joyful music making".[42] Richard Goldstein of The New York Times called the album a "major success."[43] Alan Smith of NME derided "Revolution #9" as a "pretentious" example of "idiot immaturity", but assigned the benediction "God Bless You, Beatles!" to "most of the rest" of the album.[44] Jann Wenner of Rolling Stone called it "the best album they have ever released" and asserted that the band are allowed to appropriate other styles because their ability and identity are "so strong that they make it uniquely theirs, and uniquely the Beatles. They are so good that they not only expand the idiom, but they are also able to penetrate it and take it further."[45]
The Beatles has since been regarded as one of the best albums of all time.[46] In 2003, Rolling Stone ranked it number 10 on its list of the 500 greatest albums of all time.[47] In a retrospective review, Neil McCormick of The Daily Telegraph also viewed the album as one of the greatest and found it "so eccentric and interesting" that "even its sketchiest oddities somehow gain power amidst the cornucopia of ideas and performances."[31] Allmusic editor Stephen Thomas Erlewine also felt that the album is interesting for "its mess" and wrote that each song is an "entity to itself, as the band touches on anything and everything they can", which "makes for a frustratingly scattershot record or a singularly gripping musical experience, depending on your view".[1] In The New Rolling Stone Album Guide (2004), Rob Sheffield gave the album five stars and said that, despite "loads of self-indulgent filler", listeners often pick different highlights, which is "part of the fun".[48] Slant Magazine's Eric Henderson claimed that The Beatles remains one of the band's few albums that "resists reflexive canonisation, which, along with society's continued fragmentation, keeps the album fresh and surprising."[49]
Cultural responses
Ian MacDonald, in his book Revolution in the Head, argues that The Beatles was the album in which the band's cryptic messages to its fan base became not merely vague but intentionally and perhaps dangerously open-ended, citing oblique passages in songs like "Glass Onion" (e.g., "the walrus was Paul") and "Piggies" ("what they need's a damn good whacking"). These pronouncements, and many others on the album, came to attract extraordinary popular interest at a time when more of the world's youth were using drugs recreationally and looking for spiritual, political, and strategic advice from The Beatles. Steve Turner, too, in his book A Hard Day's Write, maintains that, with this album, "The Beatles had perhaps laid themselves open to misinterpretation by mixing up the languages of poetry and nonsense."[50] Bob Dylan's songs had been similarly mined for hidden meanings, but the massive countercultural analysis of The Beatles surpassed anything that had gone before.[51] Sociologist Michael A. Katovich writes that the album's release "engendered a collective appreciation of it as a 'state-of-the-art' rendition of the current pop, rock, and folk-rock sounds."[2]
Even Lennon's seemingly direct engagement with the tumultuous political issues of 1968 in "Revolution 1" carried a nuanced obliqueness, and ended up sending messages the author may not have intended. In the album version of the song, Lennon advises those who "talk about destruction" to "count me out." As MacDonald notes, however, Lennon then follows the sung word "out" with the spoken word "in." At the time of the album's release — which followed, chronologically, the up-tempo single version of the song, "Revolution" — that single word "in" was taken by many on the radical left as Lennon's acknowledgment, after considered thought, that violence in the pursuit of political aims was indeed justified in some cases. At a time of increasing unrest in the streets and campuses of Paris and Berkeley, the album's lyrics seemed to many to mark a reversal of Lennon's position on the question, which was hotly debated during this period.[51] However, the recording chronology belies the interpretation that from the single to the album Lennon moved from a definite position to one of ambivalence, since despite the single's earlier release it was the album version that was recorded first.[52]
Cult leader Charles Manson persuaded members of his "family" that the album was an apocalyptic message predicting a prolonged race war and justified the murder of wealthy people.[53]
In October 1969, a Detroit radio programme began to promote theories based on clues supposedly left on The Beatles and other Beatles albums that Paul McCartney had died and been replaced by a lookalike. The ensuing hunt for clues to a cover up, that The Beatles presumably wanted to suppress (and simultaneously publicise), became one of the classic examples of an urban legend.
On the 40th anniversary of the album's release, Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano wrote that it "remains a type of magical musical anthology: 30 songs you can go through and listen to at will, certain of finding some pearls that even today remain unparalleled."[54]
Commercial performance
As it was their first studio album in almost eighteen months (and coming after the blockbuster success of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band) expectations were high at time of release of The Beatles. The album debuted at number 1 in the UK on 1 December 1968[55] (becoming their third album to do so, after Help! and Revolver). It spent seven weeks at the top of the UK charts (including the entire competitive Christmas season), until it was replaced by The Seekers' Best of the Seekers on 25 January 1969, dropping to number 2.[55] However, the album returned to the top spot the next week, spending an eighth and final week at number 1.[55] It then spent another four weeks in the Top 10, and then dropped in the charts more quickly than Sgt. Pepper. The White Album was notable for blocking The Beatles' follow-up album, Yellow Submarine, which debuted (and peaked at) number 3 on 8 February 1969, the same week The White Album was dominating the second position on the charts. In all, The Beatles spent 24 weeks on the UK charts, far less than the more than 200 weeks for Sgt. Pepper.
In the United States, the album achieved huge commercial success. Capitol Records sold over 3.3 million copies of The White Album to stores within the first four days of the album's release.[56] It debuted at number 11, jumped to number 2, and reached number 1 in its third week, spending a total of nine weeks at the top. In all, The Beatles spent 155 weeks on the Billboard 200. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles is The Beatles' best-selling album at 19-times platinum and the tenth-best-selling album of all time in the United States. (Each sale is counted as two sales, because The Beatles is a double record set.)
Track listing
All tracks are written by Lennon–McCartney, except where noted
No. | Title | Lead vocals[51] | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Back in the U.S.S.R." | McCartney | 2:43 |
2. | "Dear Prudence" | Lennon | 3:56 |
3. | "Glass Onion" | Lennon | 2:17 |
4. | "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" | McCartney | 3:08 |
5. | "Wild Honey Pie" | McCartney | 0:52 |
6. | "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill" | Lennon | 3:14 |
7. | "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" (George Harrison) | Harrison | 4:45 |
8. | "Happiness Is a Warm Gun" | Lennon | 2:43 |
No. | Title | Lead vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Martha My Dear" | McCartney | 2:28 |
2. | "I'm So Tired" | Lennon | 2:03 |
3. | "Blackbird" | McCartney | 2:18 |
4. | "Piggies" (Harrison) | Harrison | 2:04 |
5. | "Rocky Raccoon" | McCartney | 3:33 |
6. | "Don't Pass Me By" (Richard Starkey) | Starr | 3:51 |
7. | "Why Don't We Do It in the Road?" | McCartney | 1:41 |
8. | "I Will" | McCartney | 1:46 |
9. | "Julia" | Lennon | 2:54 |
No. | Title | Lead vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Birthday" | McCartney and Lennon | 2:42 |
2. | "Yer Blues" | Lennon | 4:01 |
3. | "Mother Nature's Son" | McCartney | 2:48 |
4. | "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey" | Lennon | 2:24 |
5. | "Sexy Sadie" | Lennon | 3:15 |
6. | "Helter Skelter" | McCartney | 4:29 |
7. | "Long, Long, Long" (Harrison) | Harrison | 3:04 |
No. | Title | Lead vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Revolution 1" | Lennon | 4:15 |
2. | "Honey Pie" | McCartney | 2:41 |
3. | "Savoy Truffle" (Harrison) | Harrison | 2:54 |
4. | "Cry Baby Cry" | Lennon, with McCartney | 3:02 |
5. | "Revolution 9" | Speaking from Lennon, Harrison, George Martin and Yoko Ono | 8:22 |
6. | "Good Night" | Starr | 3:13 |
Personnel
- The Beatles
- John Lennon – lead, harmony and background vocals; acoustic, lead, bass and rhythm guitars; keyboards (electric and acoustic pianos, Hammond organ, harmonium and mellotron); extra drums and assorted percussion (tambourine, maracas, cymbals, thumping on the back of an acoustic guitar, handclaps and vocal percussion); harmonica, whistling and saxophone; tapes, tape loops and sound effects (electronic and home-made)[17]
- Paul McCartney – lead, harmony and background vocals; acoustic, lead, rhythm and bass guitars; keyboards (electric and acoustic pianos and Hammond organ); assorted percussion (timpani, tambourine, cowbell, hand shake bell, handclaps, foot taps and vocal percussion); drums (on "Back in the U.S.S.R." and "Dear Prudence"); recorder and flugelhorn; sound effects[17]
- George Harrison – lead, harmony and background vocals; acoustic, rhythm, bass and lead guitars; Hammond organ; extra drums and assorted percussion (tambourine, handclaps and vocal percussion) and sound effects[17]
- Ringo Starr – drums and assorted percussion (tambourine, bongos, cymbals, maracas and vocal percussion); electric piano and sleigh bell (on "Don't Pass Me By"), lead vocals (on "Don't Pass Me By" and "Good Night") and backing vocals ("The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill")[17]
- Guest musicians
- Eric Clapton – lead guitar on "While my Guitar Gently Weeps"[19]
- Mal Evans – backing vocals and handclaps on "Dear Prudence",[57] handclaps on "Birthday",[58] trumpet on "Helter Skelter"[59]
- Jack Fallon – violin on "Don't Pass Me By"[60]
- Pattie Harrison – backing vocals on "Birthday"[58]
- Jackie Lomax – backing vocals and handclaps on "Dear Prudence"[57]
- Maureen Starkey – backing vocals on "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill"[61]
- Yoko Ono – backing vocals, brief lead vocals and handclaps on "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill",[61] backing vocals on "Birthday",[58] speech, tapes and sound effects on "Revolution 9"[62]
- Session musicians
- Ted Barker – trombone on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Leon Calvert – trumpet and flugelhorn on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Henry Datyner, Eric Bowie, Norman Lederman, and Ronald Thomas – violin on "Glass Onion"[64]
- Bernard Miller, Dennis McConnell, Lou Soufier and Les Maddox – violin on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Reginald Kilby – cello on "Glass Onion"[64] and "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Eldon Fox – cello on "Glass Onion"[64]
- Frederick Alexander – cello on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Harry Klein – saxophone on "Savoy Truffle"[65] and "Honey Pie"[66]
- Dennis Walton, Ronald Chamberlain, Jim Chest, and Rex Morris – saxophone on "Honey Pie"[66]
- Raymond Newman and David Smith – clarinet on "Honey Pie"[66]
- Art Ellefson, Danny Moss, and Derek Collins – tenor sax on "Savoy Truffle"[65]
- Ronnie Ross and Bernard George – baritone sax on "Savoy Truffle"[65]
- Alf Reece – tuba on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- The Mike Sammes Singers – backing vocals on "Good Night"[67]
- Stanley Reynolds and Ronnie Hughes – trumpet on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Tony Tunstall – French horn on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- John Underwood and Keith Cummings – viola on "Glass Onion"[64]
- Leo Birnbaum and Henry Myerscough – viola on "Martha My Dear"[63]
- Production team
- Geoff Emerick – engineer,[51] speech on "Revolution 9"[68]
- George Martin – record producer and mixer;[51] string, brass, clarinet, orchestral arrangements and conducting;[51] piano on "Rocky Raccoon"[69]
- Ken Scott – engineer and mixer[51]
- Barry Sheffield – engineer (Trident Studio) [51]
- Chris Thomas – producer;[51] Mellotron on "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill",[61] harpsichord on "Piggies",[70] piano on "Long, Long, Long"[71] Saxophone arrangement on "Savoy Truffle" [72]
Certifications
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Argentina (CAPIF)[73] Listed as Album Blanco |
Platinum | 60,000^ |
Argentina (CAPIF)[73] Listed as The Beatles |
Gold | 30,000^ |
Australia (ARIA)[74] | 2× Platinum | 140,000^ |
Canada (Music Canada)[75] | 8× Platinum | 800,000^ |
New Zealand (RMNZ)[76] | 2× Platinum | 30,000^ |
United States (RIAA)[77] | 19× Platinum | 9,500,000^ |
* Sales figures based on certification alone. |
See also
- List of best-selling albums in the United States
- Ken Mansfield
- Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
- Karlheinz Stockhausen
References
- ^ a b c d Erlewine, Stephen Thomas. "Review of The Beatles [White Album]". Allmusic. Retrieved 24 December 2009.
- ^ a b Katovich et al. 2009, p. 401.
- ^ Time. 27 September 1967. p. 128.
{{cite news}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "Biography for Timothy Leary". IMDB. Retrieved 24 December 2009.
- ^ Anthology, p 281
- ^ Spitz (2005), p 752
- ^ Anthology, p 283
- ^ Giuliano, Geoffrey; Giuliano, Avalon (2005). Revolver: The Secret History of the Beatles [Hardcover]. John Blake. p. 126. ISBN 1844541606, 9781844541607.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help) - ^ Wenner, Jann (2000) [1971]. Lennon Remembers. Verso, W.W. Norton & Co. p. 27. ISBN 1-85984-376-X.
Yeah, there was a big hullabaloo about him trying to rape Mia Farrow or trying to get off with Mia Farrow and a few other women, things like that.
- ^ Brown, Peter; Gaines, Steven (2002). The Love You Make: An Insider's Story of The Beatles. Penguin Group Inc. ISBN 0-451-20735-1.
- ^ Spitz, Bob (2005). The Beatles: The Biography. Little Brown and Company. ISBN 0-316-01331-5.
- ^ Lennon, Cynthia (1978). A Twist of Lennon. Star Books. ISBN 0-352-30196-1.
- ^ Sheff, David (1981). The Playboy Interviews with John Lennon & Yoko Ono. Playboy Press.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i The Beatles Anthology (1995)
- ^ Harry (2000) pp 108–9
- ^ Harry (2002) pp 777–78
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Lewisohn (1988)
- ^ Nigel Bell. "The White Album @ Playhouse". BBC. Retrieved 28 June 2008.
- ^ a b Lewisohn (1988), p. 154.
- ^ Ankeny, Jason. "Jack Fallon: Biography". Allmusic. Retrieved 25 September 2009.
- ^ François Vander Linden. "The Beatles - From Kinfauns To Chaos (Disk1)". BootlegZone. Retrieved 23 August 2011.
- ^ François Vander Linden. "The Beatles - From Kinfauns To Chaos (Disk2)". BootlegZone. Retrieved 23 August 2011.
- ^ a b c Dowlding, William J. (1989). Beatlesongs. Simon & Schuster Inc. ISBN 0-671-68229-6.
- ^ Kreps, Daniel (27 February 2009). "The Beatles' Experimental "Revolution 1 (Take 20)" Surfaces". Rolling Stone.
- ^ The Beatles Anthology DVD features an interview with Martin confirming this discussion.
- ^ The Beatles (2003). The Beatles Anthology (DVD). Apple Records. ASIN B00008GKEG.
- ^ Everett, Walter (1999). The Beatles as Musicians: Revolver through the Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 207. ISBN 0-19-509553-7.
- ^ "Example of "white album" reel-to-reel artwork". RareBeatles.com.
- ^ ""White album" cassette slipcase".
- ^ Du Noyer, Paul. "Review — The Beatles". Blender. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
- ^ a b McCormick, Neil (8 September 2009). "The Beatles - The Beatles, review". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
- ^ Larkin, Colin (2006). Encyclopedia of Popular Music. Vol. 1. Muze. p. 489. ISBN 0195313739.
- ^ Richardson, Mark (10 September 2009). "Album Review: The Beatles: The Beatles". Pitchfork Media. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
- ^ Zupko, Sarah. "The Beatles: White Album". PopMatters. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
- ^ Marsh, Dave; Swenson, John (Editors). The Rolling Stone Record Guide, 1st edition, Random House/Rolling Stone Press, 1979, p. 27.
- ^ Henderson, Eric (2 August 2004). "The Beatles: The Beatles (The White Album)". Slant Magazine. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
- ^ Emerick & Massey 2007, p. 264.
- ^ a b Womack & Davis 2006, p. 149.
- ^ Cohn, Nik (15 December 1968). "A Briton Blasts The Beatles". The New York Times.
- ^ Christgau, Robert (1971). "Living Without the Beatles". The Village Voice. New York. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Womack & Davis 2006, pp. 147–9.
- ^ Norman, Phillip (1981). Shout!. Fireside Press.
- ^ Goldstein, Richard (8 December 1968). The New York Times.
{{cite news}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ Smith, Alan (9 November 1968). "The Brilliant, the Bad, and the Ugly". New Musical Express. UK.
- ^ Wenner, Jann (21 December 1968). "Review: The Beatles". Rolling Stone. New York: 10.
- ^ "Beatles classic voted worst song". BBC News. 10 November 2004. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- ^ "500 Greatest Albums of All Time: The Beatles, 'The White Album'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
- ^ Brackett, Nathan (2004). The New Rolling Stone Album Guide. Simon and Schuster.
- ^ Henderson, Eric (2 August 2004). "The Beatles (The White Album)". Slant Magazine. Retrieved 24 December 2009.
- ^ Turner, Steve (1996). A Hard Day's Write. London: Little Brown.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i MacDonald (2005)
- ^ "Revolution 1". The Beatles Bible.
- ^ Bugliosi, Vincent; Gentry, Curt (1994). Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders (25th Anniversary ed.). W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-08700-X.
- ^ "Beatles' music better than today's pop songs". Vatican newspaper. Catholic News Service. 24 November 2008.
- ^ a b c Persky, Sharon. "UK top 10 albums 1960s". Retrieved 24 December 2009.
- ^ "Beatles Record-Busting LP May Be All-Time Biggest". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on 13 January 2009. Retrieved 21 February 2013.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b MacDonald (2005), p. 310
- ^ a b c MacDonald (2005), p. 316
- ^ Lewisohn (1988), p. 154
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 286
- ^ a b c MacDonald (2005), p. 324
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 290
- ^ a b c d e f g h i MacDonald (2005), p. 322
- ^ a b c d MacDonald (2005), p. 311
- ^ a b c MacDonald (2005), p. 321
- ^ a b c MacDonald (2005), p. 320
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 294
- ^ Lewisohn (1988), p. 135
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 308
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 317
- ^ MacDonald (2005), p. 323
- ^ Lewisohn (1988), p. 161
- ^ a b "Discos de oro y platino" (in Spanish). Cámara Argentina de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
- ^ "ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2009 Albums" (PDF). Australian Recording Industry Association. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
- ^ "Canadian album certifications – The Beatles – The White Album". Music Canada. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
- ^ THE FIELD id (chart number) MUST BE PROVIDED for NEW ZEALAND CERTIFICATION.
- ^ "American album certifications – The Beatles – The Beatles". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
Bibliography
- Emerick, Geoff; Massey, Howard (15 February 2007). Here, There and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles. Gotham Books. ISBN 1592402690.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Katovich, Michael A.; et al. (30 November 2009). Denzin, Norman K. (ed.). Studies in Symbolic Interaction. Emerald Group Publishing. ISBN 1848557841.
{{cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help); Unknown parameter|other=
ignored (|others=
suggested) (help) - Harry, Bill (2000). The Beatles Encyclopaedia: Revised and Updated. London: Virgin Publishing. ISBN 0-7535-0481-2.
- Harry, Bill (2002). The Paul McCartney Encyclopedia. Virgin Books. ISBN 0-7535-0716-1.
- Lewisohn, Mark (1988). The Beatles Recording Sessions. New York: Harmony Books. ISBN 0-517-57066-1.
- MacDonald, Ian (2005). Revolution in the Head: The Beatles' Records and the Sixties (Second Revised ed.). London: Pimlico (Rand). ISBN 1-84413-828-3.
- Penman, Ross (2009). The Beatles in New Zealand ... a discography. ISBN 978-0-473-15155-3.
- Womack, Kenneth; Davis, Todd F. (2006). Reading the Beatles: Cultural Studies, Literary Criticism, and the Fab Four. SUNY Press. ISBN 0791481964.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
External links
- THE WHITE ALBUM LISTENING PARTY, a 2008 public radio special produced by Paul Ingles
- Further information on the album, including photographs of the packaging at NorwegianWood.org
- The White Album on The Beatles Bible
- The Beatles comment on White Album song by song
- The Beatles Stereo Vinyl Box Set 2012. Remastered vinyl record album collection. Released Nov13,2012
- The Beatles ⚠ "
mbid
" is missing! at MusicBrainz
- Use dmy dates from April 2013
- Pages with empty short description
- 1968 albums
- Albums produced by George Martin
- Albums recorded at Abbey Road Studios
- Apple Records albums
- The Beatles albums
- Capitol Records albums
- English-language albums
- Recording Industry Association of America Diamond Award albums
- Albums arranged by George Martin
- Albums conducted by George Martin